TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The transcript depicts an undercover investigation into alleged fraud surrounding the federal 8(a) and pass-through programs used to award contracts to minority-owned small businesses. The participants discuss how government contractors, including ATI Government Solutions, allegedly leverage Native American status to win and maximize contracts with limited competition. Key points asserted in the dialogue: - ATI would supposedly handle about 20% of the actual development work, while subcontractors would perform roughly 80% of the work. This arrangement is framed as a “pass-through” scheme in which the prime contractor profits while outsourcing most of the labor. - It is claimed that because ATI is allegedly Native American–owned, it benefits from set-asides and government contracts with little or no bidding. The conversation emphasizes that Native status enables “an automatic win because of your Native American status” and that there is “no competition” in certain bids. - The discussion references a mechanics of 51% ownership on paper versus real control: “On paper 51%,” with the assertion that the tribal ownership is maintained on paper for compliance, while the supporting operations are controlled by non-Native executives. The participants claim this arrangement allows ATI to secure large contracts (e.g., “$100,000,000 contracts”) with minimal direct work by the Native-owned entity. - The investigation identifies Malayne Cromwell, ATI’s director of contracts, and describes her explaining pass-throughs and the 51% on-paper ownership. It is claimed that ATI’s on-paper tribal ownership is designed to ensure favorable treatment in bidding, while the actual work is done by subcontractors. - The transcript also includes a broader claim that the Susanville Indian Rancheria appears to own ATI on paper, but two non-Native executives—Furmidge Crutchfield (CEO) and Scott Deutschman (CDO)—manage operations, with Crutchfield and the ranchería’s involvement described as minimal in practice. Cromwell allegedly confirms that ATI adheres to the 51% tribal ownership on paper. - A hypothetical arrangement is discussed in which the tribe would own 51% of a new company to obtain government contracts, with the actual work performed by others. The conversation asserts this would allow a party to pose as Native American-owned to gain bids. - The investigation notes the potential legal risk and references cases like Cusisis v. United States, noting that deception in securing contracts can lead to wire fraud charges. It cites a Supreme Court interpretation emphasizing deception as the focus of the fraud statute. - The report highlights a dramatic rise in ATI’s profits from about $2,000,000 in 2019 to $100,000,000 projected for the current year, suggesting the structure is being exploited to generate large sums under the 8(a) program. It also mentions SBA thresholds for small-business status and describes how Crutchfield allegedly cycles through new companies to stay below those limits. - The investigators reveal themselves as undercover journalists and promise to release more material (part two) detailing ATI employees’ statements. They claim to have recorded Cromwell stating that many comments were her opinion and that she wanted the public not to know about the alleged scheme. - The piece closes with a call for DOJ accountability and an appeal for donations to support ongoing investigative journalism, inviting viewers to stay tuned for future installments. Notable names include Malayne Cromwell (ATI director of contracts), Furmidge Crutchfield (ATI CEO), Scott Deutschman (CDO), and Arien Hart (head of the Susanville Indian Rancheria). The narrative frames ATI as embodying a widespread, under-scrutinized system of pass-through contracts that purportedly prioritize tribal status over actual labor contribution.

Can you name some NGOs that have received significant funding but haven't used it to protect children? Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services were mentioned. I spoke with someone from DHS who handles electronic fund transfers. He revealed that he oversees Jewish Family Services and recently issued a check for $600 million. When I asked if that was for three years, he clarified that it was actually for just two to three months and is renewable.

The video presents an undercover investigative report into what the presenters describe as “eight a pass-through” schemes linked to minority-owned small business programs, centering on ATI Government Solutions. The speakers claim that ATI leverages Native American status to win large federal contracts with little competitive bidding, then passes most of the work to subcontractors while keeping the majority of the profits. Key claims and dynamics described: - ATI would do 20% of the work while subcontractors do 80%, enabling ATI to collect a large share of the contract money. A participant states, “So we we do about 20% of the work,” and another confirms, “Correct. Yeah. They’re doing most of work.” - Pass-through arrangements are highlighted as a mechanism where Native American status guarantees automatic wins, with subcontractors bidding in their industry but not being American, thus enabling ATI to win via the Native status. A responder says, “with pass throughs, because you’re Native American, right, if you have… all they do is partner with you. They use their people. They subcontract to them. They became our sub, and it’s an automatic win because of your native American status.” - The program is framed as already well-known in Washington as a “best kept secret,” with claims that “There’s no competition because you’re Native American” and that this system is designed to enrich the prime contractor at the expense of taxpayers. - The investigation identifies ATI as a technology services company obtaining federal contracts for next-generation computing solutions, and asserts ATI benefits from eight(a) tribal status, which is described as heavily favored by federal contracts. - Malayne Cromwell, ATI’s director of contracts, purportedly explains that the company’s native American ownership is what enables the contracts, and discusses pass-throughs as a strategic advantage. A journalist notes that Cromwell told them about pass-throughs and indicated that “pass throughs are a great thing as well.” - The footage asserts ATI’s claimed ownership structure on paper shows 51% Native American ownership, enabling access to set-aside contracts. The video questions whether the Susanville Indian Rancheria actually owns ATI and investigates the role of tribal ownership in practice. A participant explains that “ATI is abiding by this 51% tribal ownership on paper.” - The investigation reveals that ATI’s leadership includes non-Native executives—Furmidge Crutchfield (CEO), his fiancée Marina Mogalyeva (CFO), and Scott Deutschman (CDO)—while the Rancheria appears to have limited involvement in operations. An interviewee claims the tribe is the owner of ATI on paper, but the executives run the company and perform the work. - The reporter notes that the tribal arrangement would facilitate similar schemes for others who seek government contracts, suggesting a model where 51% ownership is held by a tribe “on paper,” while the actual work is done by others. - The discussion cites the 51% rule codified in the Federal Acquisition Regulations as FAR 52.219-14, stating that the prime contractor must do at least 51% of the work. The video alleges ATI may be violating this rule by directing most work to subcontractors. - The investigation references usaspending.gov data showing ATI’s profits rising from about $2 million in 2019 to about $100 million in the current year, and discusses SBA small-business thresholds (net worth, AGI, assets) that prompt Crutchfield to create new entities to stay within “small business” criteria. - The segment mentions a related Pennsylvania case (Cusisis v. US) in which a contractor was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy for fraudulent inducement related to disadvantaged business enterprise schemes, highlighting the legal risk of deception in these arrangements. - The report concludes with a staged reveal of the reporters’ identities and promises forthcoming parts, urging viewers to donate to the Citizen Journalism Foundation and signaling ongoing journalistic accountability efforts. Note: The transcript contains specific names and quotes attributed to individuals involved in ATI and allied entities, as well as investigative claims about ownership structures and regulatory interpretations.

"Big Balls" says that "Big Balls" is their LinkedIn username because people on LinkedIn take themselves too seriously and are adverse to risk, and they wanted to be neither of those things. "Big Balls" is working on payment computer stuff to root out fraud and waste. There is no accounting of what payments actually go to in the payment computer. When looking at a specific line item, like $20,000,000, for the majority of payment systems, they don't know what the money is going to. This is a huge cause for concern because the upstream thing which is distributing the money literally has no checks, and no accountability to the actual American taxpayer, making it a huge vector for fraud, waste, and abuse. There is no incentive if you work in the government to respect taxpayer money, and incentives decide the outcomes.

The transcript documents an undercover investigation into alleged abuses of the SBA’s 8(a) program and related “pass-through” schemes used to obtain federal contracts. The participants discuss a pattern in which a prime contractor, such as ATI Government Solutions, leverages Native American tribal status to win contracts, then largely subcontract the work to others while keeping the majority of the payment. Key points raised: - ATI’s claimed structure: ATI Government Solutions is described as a technology services company that secures hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for federal contracts by exploiting a supposed Native American 8(a) tribal ownership. The program is presented as heavily favoring firms with Native American status, enabling ATI to win contracts with little or no bidding. - Pass-throughs and ownership: A recurring claim is that ATI uses pass-through arrangements to funnel contracts to subcontractors, with the majority of the actual work performed by those subcontractors and ATI taking a large share of the profits. The conversation indicates ATI does about 20% of the work itself, with 80% subcontracted, and that “pass-throughs” enable non-Native contractors to win through ATI’s Native status. - On-paper 51% ownership: The group cites the 51% rule (the prime contractor must perform at least 51% of the work), yet asserts that ATI is 51% tribal-owned on paper while performing little actual work, raising questions about the true ownership and control of the company. - Suspected real ownership and control: The investigation uncovers that ATI’s leadership is not Native American, and that two Caucasian executives, Furmidge Crutchfield (CEO) and Scott Deutschman (CDO), with associates, allegedly manage operations. The conversation suggests the Susanville Indian Rancheria’s ownership is largely on paper, with the tribe appearing to own the entity for show while the executives run the day-to-day business. - Drama of the “secret”: The participants emphasize that the Native ownership is treated as a secret and a supposed competitive advantage that should remain undisclosed, highlighting a culture of secrecy around the arrangements. - Specific individuals and roles: Malayne Cromwell (ATI’s director of contracts) is presented as confirming many of these practices, including the reliance on pass-throughs and that the stake held by the tribe is 51% on paper. Arian Hart (head of the Susanville Indian Rancheria) discusses how a tribal ownership appearance could be arranged to facilitate contract access, including potentially relinquishing 51% ownership. - Real-world implications: The dialogue frames these schemes as defrauding taxpayers and undermining the communities the programs are meant to uplift, with the 51% rule being exploited to obtain contracts while the workforce bears the bulk of the labor costs. - Legal context and examples: The report references the federal regulations (FAR 52.219-14, the limitations of subcontracting) and cites a related case (Cusisis v. US) to illustrate consequences of deceptive practices in similar contexts. - Growth and lifecycle: The investigation notes ATI’s profits rising from about $2,000,000 in 2019 to $100,000,000 in the current year, suggesting mechanisms to evade size standards by creating new entities to re-enter the 8(a) program when nearing small-business thresholds. - Call to accountability: The reporters reveal themselves as investigative journalists and promise to publish part two, asserting the need for Department of Justice action and accountability for the practices described. They urge donors to support Citizen Journalism Foundation and announce related events. Overall, the transcript portrays an undercover exposé alleging that ATI and connected entities exploit 8(a) and pass-through mechanisms to win contracts, avoid full competition, and divert most work to subcontractors while the owning tribe and executive leaders benefit financially, with the supposed tribal ownership maintained primarily on paper.

Official A states that in 2022, the office found that president Biden's DHS allowed some Afghans into the country before they were fully vetted, including one who had been liberated from prison by the Taliban. Official A notes that over 50 known or suspected terrorists had entered the United States as a result of Biden administration screening or lack thereof, and that last month the director of national intelligence said that 2,000 Afghans in America may have ties to terrorism. Official A asks whether a formal vetting process was in place, and asserts that the department did not have a formal process at the start of the OAW. Official A repeats the figure and corrects it to 36,000, calling it astounding. Official B replies that CARE, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is the organization in question, stating that CARE was founded at a 1993 meeting and that they specifically state they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas. Official A asks how much money CARE received from the federal government to shepherd Afghan parolees. Official B responds that CARE received $15,000,000 in California and more than $1,000,000 in Washington. Official A adds that when they check federal databases for CARE, they find nothing, and Official B explains that the money did not go directly from the federal government to CARE, but rather through an intermediary, and that this is how they’ve hidden the money. Official A states, “We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption, and we've gotta figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization terrorized.”

Is it standard for your department to meet with dark money groups secretly? I can't speak to actions taken by the former deputy secretary, who is no longer with us. But you are the secretary of the interior, correct? Yes, I am. Do the people here work for you? They work with me. So you're not in charge? I provide vision and direction. Do you take responsibility for the department? Yes, I do. Then why are your leaders meeting with dark money groups off the books? This is the first I've heard of this. I can't comment on my deputy's actions. What did they gain from canceling leases at their request? I don't know who that individual is. You seem unaware of your department's issues. We have a corruption problem in your department.

Speaker 0 asks how many staff work at GC Strategies. Speaker 1 responds that they have 2 employees but outsource finance and legal. Speaker 0 asks about app programming or design, to which Speaker 1 says they do not do that. Speaker 0 clarifies Speaker 1's role in IT contracts with the government and bringing in individuals that the government doesn't have access to. Speaker 0 mentions the $54 million ArriveCAN app and asks if it's under RCMP investigation. Speaker 1 says they are not aware of any investigation. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1's work with Bockler and the amount of money made from government contracts, but Speaker 1 doesn't have the exact numbers. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 for not having basic details about their work. Speaker 1 apologizes and offers to provide the information later. Speaker 0 asks how much Speaker 1 was paid for ArriveCAN, but Speaker 1 doesn't have the exact amount. Speaker 0 suggests $9 million, but Speaker 1 disputes it. Speaker 1 mentions that the number is publicized in the media and estimates it to be between 15% and 30% of that amount. Speaker 0 finds it interesting that Speaker 1 is not willing to share the exact number considering the amount of work not done on the app and the money collected.

When people talk about the deep state, in a sense, this is the commanding control of a major part of the deep state. No. It is the commanding control of the deep state. Congress said, we want comprehensive oversight on both operations in Afghanistan and Iraq and we want a plan for oversight and we're going to delegate this directly to the chair of the SIGI. I see. So you really worked for the chair of the SIGI. Well, this is the interesting piece. He in turn delegates it down to the IG at the DOD. Yeah. And I'm working for him. Yeah. So, you're working directly for the inspector general at DOD. But for the SIGI actually. But in effect You really were working for the SIGI. You bet. And who at the SIGI? Michael E Horowitz. Wow. Horowitz? Yes. One of the worst. Yes. One of the absolute worst. Horowitz of Russia collusion fame. Yes. Who now is at is not out of the government, who now is at the Federal Reserve. Right. Maybe. Ready to come back. Right. Still probably providing emeritus status on the SIGI. What was his position officially at the He was the DOJ IG. He was the inspector general at DOJ. And he replaced Glenn Fine who went to DOD. Wow. It's a really nice tightrope. And his deputy then went on to become the DODIG. And his deputy was spent thirty years over in The US Attorney's Office District Of Columbia. They really have it all sewn up, don't they? The assistant FBI director for integrity and ethics were for Glenn Fine and runs the DO runs the FBI. Yes. Think of the Siggy as an integrated command and control center. So, the buck stops with them. Yes. Because every complaint that is made. In any agency whatsoever goes to the Inspector General, and from those IGs report to the SIGI and it dies. And are investigated by the SIGI. And are investigated by the SIGI and it all dies. That's whistleblower complaints actually go to die. If it's against the members of the SIGI. Unless it's in their interest to prosecute it. Politically, yes. So, when people talk about the deep state, in a sense, this is the command and control of a major part of the deep state. No. It is the command and control of the deep state. It's in every bureau, every board, every agency, and every commission. One person, 2,300,000 people in the executive branch. I only need about 40 people to run the whole show. As long as you ensure that no one can foil my records, as long as everything I do is law enforcement sensitive, and as long as anybody that is a whistleblower can get collective punishment. Which is what you have seen with over 700 documented cases of people who've been Retaliated against. We see it every day. We see it every day.

There's significant fraud in USAID, with radical groups receiving funds they don't deserve. A staggering amount, like a hundred million, is being misallocated. It's crucial to investigate the kickbacks associated with this spending. Who would invest such sums in questionable projects? It's likely that those who received the funds are not returning any to the government, indicating a high level of corruption. The key issue is understanding the extent of these kickbacks.

Can you name some NGOs that have misused funds meant to protect children? Catholic Charities, Lutheran Family Services, and Jewish Family Services were mentioned. I spoke with a DHS employee who handles electronic fund transfers. He revealed that he oversees Jewish Family Services and has issued a check for $600 million. When I asked if that amount was for three years, he clarified that it was actually for just two or three months, and it’s renewable.

The speaker discusses a conspiracy involving the US government and NGOs bringing illegal immigrants into the country. A DHS employee reveals how NGOs receive millions of dollars to facilitate this operation. The employee mentions Jewish Family Services receiving $600 million for a few months, with subcontractors requesting more funds. The partnership between NGOs and the government is described as a massive money laundering scheme.

A federal consulting group within the Department of Interior managed contracts for various agencies. One contract was for $830 million to conduct surveys. The surveys were simple, consisting of 10 questions on an 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper, easily created by a child or AI. This contract was stopped after the inauguration. The speaker stated that the contract was a fraud.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

Two individuals who ran a company with no other employees were hired by the government to do no IT work. Instead, they subcontracted the work and received over $11,000,000 for themselves. The government's decision to hire these middlemen who did not perform any IT work is questionable. The speaker questions why government officials thought it was a good idea to give such a large sum to these individuals. The response from Speaker 1 suggests that the hiring was done through a standing offer or supply arrangement. The speaker further highlights the absurdity of the situation, wondering why any two Canadians couldn't do the same. The lack of knowledge regarding who made the decision to hire these individuals is mentioned, with an ongoing investigation by the RCMP.

THE DOGE report alleges that funds are siphoned from the public through NGOs and government contracts. The speaker cites two examples: "Senator Sheldon White house is under the hot seat right now because he backed the legislation that approved $14,200,000 to go to ocean conservatory." A second case concerns "Family Endeavors" in Pecos, Texas, meant for overflow of immigrant children; it has been empty since 02/2021, while "we have been paying 18,000,000 million dollars a month" to keep it open. A board member was "one of Biden's transition team members." The presenter then says, "This is my opinion only. From this point on, everything I've told you so far is facts. You can go look it up online. This is my opinion only. I call that a payoff." They conclude, "That is how they steal from you. That is today's DOGE report."

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obfuscation because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, a first for any administration. They bypassed gatekeepers and uncovered shocking data. We're talking payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to $100 billion. Funds were also traced to entities like Internews Network, pushing a specific viewpoint globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about it; we accessed the data directly and exposed it. It's only been twenty days, and we're already releasing a lot. People are trying to slow us down, but the main question is can we stop their grift?

Taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs. If it's a government-funded NGO, it's effectively just the government. A fraud loophole exists because the government can send money to an NGO that is no longer governed by U.S. laws. The money is sent overseas to one NGO, then through others. The speaker is highly confident that some of that money returns to the U.S. and enriches certain people. There are strangely wealthy members of Congress, and it's unclear how they accumulated millions while earning comparatively little. The speaker aims to investigate this and prevent it from continuing.

Tomorrow, I will hold a news conference to reveal the names of entities receiving hundreds of millions, even billions, of dollars. If you believe these entities deserve the funding, you shouldn't be a reporter. Billions are being wasted illegally, and I believe kickbacks are involved. When someone gets millions for a mere fifteen-minute assessment, that money is coming back somehow. This corruption significantly harms our country through massive expenditures. I reviewed 200 expenditures and found only three reasonable. We'll discuss this further tomorrow. I commend Elon Musk; despite daily abuse, he has uncovered more than anyone else. His team of geniuses, starting with 12 and now almost a hundred, is helping expose massive fraud.

There's tremendous fraud and abuse happening, and I'm holding a news conference tomorrow to reveal some of the entities that have received hundreds of millions, even billions of dollars. It's hard to believe this kind of fraud can occur. When you see billions being wasted illegally, there's likely kickbacks or corruption involved. Millions are given for minimal effort, and that money comes back in some form. They're spending massive amounts of money on ridiculous items. Out of 200 expenditures I reviewed, only three seemed reasonable. I commend Elon for his work in uncovering this fraud. He doesn't need to do this, especially with the abuse he faces. He and his team, which started with 12 people and has now grown to almost a hundred, have found more than anyone else could. People are joining to help because there's massive fraud.

I'm calling for an investigation to uncover who in the government has been receiving kickbacks from USAID. Doge's congressional audits reveal that three Democrat senators have each inexplicably gained over $20,000,000 in net worth. When questioned, they claimed the wealth simply appeared. These files have now been handed over to Pam Bondi at the Justice Department. If they're found guilty of using taxpayer money to enrich themselves, what consequences do you think they should face? Share your thoughts in the comments on what actions should be taken against those who steal from American citizens.

The transcript centers on an undercover investigation into alleged eight(a) pass-through schemes used to secure federal contracts, focusing on ATI Government Solutions and its connections to Native American ownership arrangements. - ATI, described as a technology services company, allegedly acquires hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars for federal contracts and benefits from a supposed Native American eight(a) tribal status. The program is said to favor Native American–owned small businesses in obtaining contracts. - A key claim is that ATI acts as a pass-through, with the prime contractor (ATI) doing only a small portion of the work and subcontracting the majority to other firms. Specifically, Malayne Cromwell states that ATI “would often do as little as 20% of the actual software development work and offload 80% of the work to their subcontractors,” with ATI “sitting back, collecting my percentage, and they do the work.” - The 51% rule is repeatedly cited: the prime contractor on a government contract must do at least 51% of the work. The investigation alleges ATI complies on paper with “51% on paper,” while the actual work is done by subcontractors. The RFI notes that the limitations of subcontracting clause FAR 52.219-14 requires the prime to perform at least 51% of the work. - The investigation describes “pass-throughs” as a mechanism whereby a non-Native company bids on a contract but partners with ATI, using ATI’s Native status to win, and then subcontracts the work to the non-Native company. The transcript states: “a lot of our subcontractors bid on contracts that were perfect in their industry, but because they weren’t American, they wouldn’t win it. We bid on it for them. They became our sub, and it's an automatic win because of the government set aside.” - There is a claim of “no bidding war” and that contracts are obtained due to Native status, with “pass-throughs” described as a “secret” and “best kept secret.” - The investigation identifies specific individuals tied to ATI and the tribal arrangement. Malayne Cromwell is identified as ATI’s director of contracts who explains the pass-through process and claims that “51% on paper” is sufficient for eligibility. The Susanville Indian Rancheria appears as the listed Native ownership on paper, but the investigation reveals that ATI was founded in collaboration with the Rancheria by two Caucasian executives, Furmidge Crutchfield (CEO) and Scott Deutschman (CDO), who supposedly manage operations. Cromwell asserts that ATI abides by the 51% tribal ownership on paper, while the leaders who actually run ATI are non-Native. - The tribal entity’s role is described as largely non-operational: “the tribe itself will not be doing any of the work. They would literally be taking 51% of the company for the sole purpose of allowing us to pose as Native American owned because it puts you to the front of the line for acquiring those government contracts.” - The investigation cites the growth of ATI’s profits from about $2,000,000 in 2019 to $100,000,000 in 2024, per usaspending.gov, and explains a pattern of creating new companies to stay under small-business thresholds as profits rise. - The report references a related case, Cusisis v. US, where a company was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy for misrepresenting DBE status in Pennsylvania, highlighting the potential legal consequences of deceptive eight(a) practices. - The piece concludes with the investigators stating they recorded statements that allegedly show pressuring for secrecy and urging quiet about the alleged schemes, and they announce part two of the story. They call on the Department of Justice to act and invite donations to support their journalism. They also mention an upcoming Citizen Journalism Foundation event.

Okay, so this Reuters thing is way bigger than we thought. Elon Musk mentioned Reuters getting government payments, and it goes deeper. I checked out usaspending.gov and found over 41 payments to Reuters. When you look this up on USAspending.gov, you can see all the individual payments yourself. Also, there is a graph at the bottom of the page, and the numbers are insane! We seriously need answers about this.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

We're uncovering massive fraud, waste, and abuse daily. Recently, it was discovered that there were $2.7 trillion in improper payments to Medicare, Medicaid, and overseas. Social Security payments are even going to deceased individuals. We're also seeing contracts where the full amount wasn't delivered. For example, a million-dollar contract might only see $500,000 distributed, and we're working to find where the rest of the money went. This is exactly what I campaigned on, and what 77 million people elected me to do.