reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The transcript discusses a plan attributed to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to airdrop oral rabies vaccines into six states over the course of a month, continuing a process that started in August in other states. The states named are Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, all of which are expected to receive these vaccines. The plan involves dropping edible satchels of food that are designed to attract wildlife. These satchels are described as containing an oral rabies vaccine, so that when wildlife consumes them, the animals are vaccinated against rabies. It is stated that this vaccination occurs without the animals’ consent, noting that animals cannot give consent. A key question raised is what would come next after this initial distribution. The speaker asks about the implications if these satchels are spread across the stated areas and whether there will be any impact on domestic pets. The transcript asserts that the satchels are intended for wildlife vaccination and that if cats and dogs end up consuming one of the satchels, it should be okay for them and they would simply be vaccinated against rabies. The speaker contends that many people have presumably already vaccinated their animals against rabies, so the program is framed as not causing harm to pets. The speaker then reflects on the broader pattern, asserting that this is how such programs begin. The argument is made that the authorities start with animals, referencing a history of starting with animals when a rabies problem is presented as an epidemic in wildlife. The speaker notes that people are concerned about wild animals biting dogs and other animals, and that the plan is presented as a measure to prevent rabies transmission in the animal population. Finally, the transcript asserts a claim about the progression of this approach, stating that this is how it begins and arguing that there is a suggestion of eventual vaccination or interventions targeting the human population, asserting that “they’ve already started to do this” with humans. The overall content centers on the described vaccination plan, its intended wildlife focus, its effects on pets, and concerns about potential expansion to humans.

Technology is being rapidly advanced and implemented in humans, particularly messenger RNA vaccines. These advancements are being fast-tracked, and it's important to acknowledge that our food species will also be affected by these vaccines.

The speaker discusses rabies and vaccines in a conspiratorial frame, arguing that rabies is fake and that the treatment and vaccine are worse than the disease. They state that the vaccine is claimed to be mandatory, but argue that mandating is “voluntary to a service” and that the true situation is a game where “mandatory” only applies once you agree to it. They claim the test for rabies is the same as used during the pandemic, asserting that “the fruit came up positive for an illness,” and suggest that this demonstrates that “we’ve been lied to,” with implications that vets benefit from the situation. The speaker recounts an historical diagnostic method: in the early nineteen hundreds, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool to determine if an animal had rabies. They describe a procedure where, if a person was bitten by a suspected dog, “the brain tissue of the dog was injected into the two rabbits,” and “If the two rabbits died, rabies was proven.” They present this as the science behind rabies diagnosis. They then criticize the vaccine’s safety, claiming “that vaccine comes with a lot of side effects.” They cite an example case: “38 dogs and cats took the new vaccine that was made out by Merck,” and claim that these subjects “started having seizures, aggression, and death,” concluding with the statement that the vaccine is portrayed as “Safe and effective” by others. On a path to alternatives, the speaker says you could find a holistic vet who will give a medical exemption so you don’t have to receive the vaccine, or you could simply say no. They claim that if a vet “doesn’t wanna play ball,” you can make them sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to your animal after taking the injection, and predict that the vet “won’t sign it.” The segment ends with a provocative note encouraging skepticism about viruses, followed by the assertion that if you are unvaccinated and the virus enters your community, the virus will … (the clip ends here with an incomplete thought, implying a cautionary consequence).

The speakers discuss rabies and vaccinations in a provocative, conspiratorial frame. They claim rabies is nonexistent and that the treatment, the vaccine, is worse than the disease. They question the idea of compulsory vaccination, asserting that mandates are voluntary until you agree to them, and describe mandates as a game. They compare the rabies test to the pandemic-era testing method, suggesting the test for rabies relies on tests that produced positive results for illnesses, implying deception. They note that in the early 1900s, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool: brain tissue from a suspected dog injected into two rabbits; if the rabbits died, rabies was proven. They present the vaccine as having many side effects and cite an instance where 38 dogs and cats given a Merck vaccine experienced seizures, aggression, and death, labeling the vaccine “Safe and effective” as something they dispute. They propose solutions: finding a holistic veterinarian who can grant a medical exemption, or simply saying no to vaccination. They claim it’s possible to make a vet sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to an animal after the injection, and suggest vets won’t sign such a guarantee. The conversation closes with a clip asserting that if you are unvaccinated, the virus will hunt you out or find you, repeating the claim that the virus will locate unvaccinated individuals. Overall, the dialogue presents a skepticism toward rabies biology and vaccination, asserts that vaccines have harmful side effects, questions mandates, and promotes exemptions or refusals, culminating in the assertion that viruses target the unvaccinated.

The mRNA in vaccines can replicate, including the replication engine, leading to potential spread from person to person. Concerns exist about the inability to stop this replication, with unknown consequences for humanity. The spike protein in these vaccines can be toxic, affecting various tissues. Deployment of this technology in vaccines for humans is already happening, with over 4,000 people injected in Japan.

Speaker 0 claims that people lie about tetanus and rabies, asserting that rabies doesn’t exist and that dogs are poisoned. They allege veterinarians administer 13 vaccinations to keep the veterinary industry in business, and that the first vaccination against dogs was injected into their brains, followed by more vaccines to sustain the vets. They describe the entire system as intended to keep “these terrorists in business” who constantly poison people and animals, and they state that if a vet truly cared about an animal, they wouldn’t inject it. The speaker asserts that injections of poisons into animals would not lead to health, applying this logic to horses, cats, and wildlife as well. They claim wildlife are vaccinated by the government, referencing deer “spinning around in circles” in the forest as evidence. The call is for people to be aware and to say no, defending their dogs, cats, and even their grandmother, framing it as a constitutional right. They urge listeners to resist vaccination or other medical interventions for family and animals, insisting on a stance of defiance against forced measures. The speaker emphasizes personal agency and the obligation to defend family and animals, portraying vaccination as coercive and harmful. They allude to expressing censored language that would condemn the alleged actions, but refrain from explicit terms. The overall message is a condemnation of vaccines and veterinary practice, framed as a political and constitutional violation, and a directive to resist vaccination and to advocate for personal choice.

Pets have died in the US from unnecessary rabies vaccines. The speaker questions the need for these vaccines, suggesting that a tire check would indicate immunity. They mention having provided articles to the public health department that support the idea that vaccines are dose dependent. Another speaker, who has a background in the pharmaceutical industry, disagrees. The first speaker explains that vaccines can cause tumors, immune diseases, and immediate reactions in animals. They express their refusal to follow a law that would require them to harm their patients.

A new study indicates mRNA injections induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease. Comparing gene profiles of mRNA-injured individuals to pre-COVID samples revealed thousands of dysregulated gene expressions linked to mitochondrial failure, suppressed cancer suppression genes, and immune dysregulation. Molecular chaos may result in cardiovascular, neurological, and carcinogenic issues, possibly due to genomic integration of DNA plasmids. A separate study showed mRNA boosters trigger dangerous immune and blood abnormalities, including increased blood clotting and immune suppression, within 48 hours in healthy young adults. Additionally, pets are being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors via Merck's Nobivac NXT, exposing pet owners to shedding of self-amplifying RNA and toxic antigens. This could potentially cause long-term genetic dysfunction in humans, with the possibility of the synthetic particle recombining with wild viruses. Individuals should ask vets about RNA or mRNA injections for pets and refuse mRNA injections for themselves.

Speaker 0 notes that vaccines are entering the food chain in several species. He mentions that currently, all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA, and that pork is an unknown amount being vaccinated with mRNA. He references Merck, described as one of the originators of ivermectin, and asks why they didn’t make a big fuss about the money they lost during COVID because of the inability to sell ivermectin into the whole thing, suggesting they could have been a kingpin in this, and they were silent. He says this is because they own a lot of mRNA companies. He notes that some of the companies state on their advertising, “we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine.” He states there are vaccines going into the swine industry, but there is no data on how much is being sold, where, and who the buyers are, so the volume remains speculative. The technology is described as customized vaccines where, on a farm, they take samples of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab, and a few days later, they produce an mRNA vaccine customized to the farm’s diseases. He emphasizes that there’s no testing, no research, nothing. They have a general understanding of the mRNA aspect of it on a general standpoint, but for each of these antigens, there is known no understanding.

The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase. And so veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets. If you look up Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck. You will find it online, and you can even buy it. It's possible if their dogs or cats receive the Nobivac NXT self self amplifying RNA particles. It's possible they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids. And so, none of this was tested by the way. They just authorized it anyways because they don't care.

The speaker clarifies they are injured by an mRNA therapeutic, not a vaccine, and highlights issues with lipid nanoparticles and synthetic mRNA, which can persist for hundreds of days. They claim that instructing cells to produce a protein that presents on the cell surface can trigger autoimmune disorders. The speaker states that the spike protein itself is biologically active, causing cells to grow and divide inappropriately, and was known to damage the placenta and lungs. They assert they knew early on that the shot didn't stay in the arm. They cite 2005 research showing the SARS-CoV-1 spike protein alone could harm animals. The speaker references 2015 gain-of-function research at UNC, NIH, and Wuhan labs, where a more lethal and transmissible SARS virus was created. A traditional vaccine attempt for this virus caused harm and lethality in animals, with pathology slides showing similar vascular lung damage seen with SARS-CoV-2. The speaker concludes that "they" knew about these risks but still rolled out the vaccine, profiting from it while falsely claiming it was safe and effective.

Self amplifying mRNA vaccine, which got fast track FDA approval a few months ago for the h five n one influenza. "That's even worse, quote, self replicating. We know Pfizer admits that their COVID shot is self replicating, thus sheds. This is officially sheds." "But now, when these self amplifying mRNA vaccines shed, they are shedding machinery that if you take it into your body, will start producing more mRNA." "There are women who miscarried when they were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna vaccine." "Pfizer told their officials that they had to report in the trial if any pregnant woman was exposed to anyone who was vaccinated." So shedding was a problem. So many people, like, didn't take it, but their spouse did. They got sick.

The transcript discusses self-amplifying replicon mRNA injections and asserts that they are being deployed for both humans and animals globally. It states that the UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics’ self-amplifying COVID-19 vaccine for adults over 18, and that the European Union previously approved the same inoculation for adults, placing it in both the EU and the UK. It also claims that Japan approved it in 2023, and that India has approved these replicon injections as well, indicating a global rollout. It highlights that in the United States, the USDA approved the self-amplifying mRNA particle injections for pets, specifically mentioning Merck’s Novavax NXT for dogs and cats, and asserts that this is being injected into pets and that shedding onto human owners across the US is possible. It notes that the FDA has fast-tracked an H5N1 bird flu replicon injection trial, emphasizing concern about these developments. The speaker outlines purported dangers of these replicating genetic materials, including the possibility of shedding from humans to humans or from pets to humans, and the potential for recombination with wild viruses to create chimeric mutants. It emphasizes the claimed approval of Arcturus Therapeutics’ injection “everywhere in the clinical trials” and then provides adverse event statistics: eighty-five percent suffered systemic adverse events, and fifteen percent required medical attention. A Uganda study is cited, claiming that the replicon injections induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety-three percent of recipients, with thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia reported, implying degraded immune systems and increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. The Uganda study is also described as showing eighty-five percent experiencing vomiting, high fevers, and feeling absolutely terrible. The speaker concludes with a strong stance against these injections, calling them a “self amplifying assault on humanity” and arguing that they should be pulled off the market and banned for human use. The overall message is a warning about global deployment, potential shedding and recombination risks, significant adverse event rates, and a call to ban self-amplifying mRNA injections for humans. The named entities include Arcturus Therapeutics, Merck, Novavax NXT, and references to regulatory actions in the UK, EU, Japan, India, and the US.

There's a Pfizer subsidiary called ZOTIS that has mRNA injected over 100 million wildlife in the U.S., including pets. This initiative, funded by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, has been ongoing for the past year and a half. Hunters were the primary source of information about this, as it was published in their magazines. A study on Staten Island involved injecting 100 white-tailed deer with Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, leading to widespread administration across the country without public knowledge. Concerns arise about hunters consuming venison, believing it to be organic. Additionally, mRNA technology is being used on vegetables and cattle, raising further worries about food safety.

We are unaware of what we are consuming in our food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018, creating transmissible mRNA that can be passed on to those who consume it. Without informed consent laws, those who have refused mRNA vaccines may unknowingly receive them through their food. This technology could be used in plants and animals, leading to unintended vaccination through food consumption.

Speaker 0: Extremely dangerous self amplifying replicon mRNA injections are currently being deployed for humans and animals across the globe. A few days ago, The UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics self amplifying COVID nineteen injection for adults over 18. Previously, the European Union approved the same Arcturus Therapeutics replicon injection for adults. So it's in The EU. It's in The UK. Japan approved it in 2023. So it's being injected into Japanese citizens as well as India. India has approved these replicon injections as well. And so it is being rolled out across the globe and here in The US is very worrisome. The USDA approved the self amplifying mRNA particle injections for our dogs and cats. This is Novavac NXT by Merck. And so that's actively being injected into our, our pets and probably shedding onto human owners across The United States as well in The US. Our FDA fast tracked an h five n one bird flu replicon injection trial, and we have to remember just how dangerous these are. So not only can they likely shed this replicating genetic material can shed onto other humans or from our pets to humans to the human owners, but they can also recombine with wild viruses and and create these chimeric mutants. But what's most important is this Arcturus Therapeutics injection being approved everywhere in the in the clinical trials for them. Eighty five percent suffered systemic adverse events, fifteen percent required medical attention. And then a recent study in Uganda, it induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety three percent of the recipients. They suffered from thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia. So their immune systems were being degraded, and they were suffering inter increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. And eighty five percent of them were vomiting, had high fevers, and felt absolutely terrible. So this self amplifying assault on humanity needs to come to an end. We have to pull these off of the market and ban them for human use.

The speaker claims that "The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase." They say "veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets." They warn that "This can probably shut on to humans and this this has to be stopped" and ask, "Has it started yet?" "Yes." They cite "Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck" and that "you will find it online, and you can even buy it." They claim it is "possible... they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids." They add that "none of this was tested" and "they just authorized it anyways because they don't care," and that "it's completely unknown really at this point."

The speaker believes mRNA shots are a "festering wound" impacting everyone that cannot be ignored. The speaker urges the new administration to address the issue, citing 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline, 33 of which are self-amplifying. Self-amplifying means they are designed to replicate indefinitely, which the speaker finds "terrifying" because current mRNA shots already lack an "off switch." The speaker claims these self-amplifying shots are already in use in Japan, India, and the EU. The speaker believes the one in the US pipeline is for H1N1, so it may not be used unless there is an issue, but they are still experimenting with it.

The speaker claims mRNA is in the food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018 with a product called Sequebiti. They claim to be able to make transmissible mRNA, meaning they can put it in an animal so that it transmits to whoever is ingesting it, effectively vaccinating them. The speaker suggests this could be engineered into plants and animals. Without informed consent laws, people who refused mRNA vaccines may get them through their food.

mRNA vaccines are being introduced into the food chain, particularly in farmed shrimp and swine. Merck, known for ivermectin, has remained quiet about its financial losses during COVID, possibly due to its ownership of several mRNA companies. These companies advertise customized vaccines for livestock, created by sampling diseases on farms and producing tailored mRNA vaccines in a matter of days. However, there is a lack of data on the extent of these vaccines' use and no thorough testing or research on the specific antigens involved. The understanding of mRNA technology is general, but detailed knowledge about each antigen is absent.

The discussion centers on pets being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors. The USDA quietly approved Merck's self-amplifying RNA shots called Novavac NXT for cats and dogs with no real safety testing. It says it gives a small dose of RNA particles delivered in the Novavac NXT vaccine. RNA copies exponentially in the cells, and the copies are transcripted into large amounts of the desired antigen. The antigen stimulates a more robust humular and cellular immune response. All sounds good in theory. However, these injections may shed messenger RNA and synthetic antigens to human owners through breath, saliva, or fluids may cause long term genetic damage similar to that seen in humans may recombine with wild viruses creating dangerous new pathogens. This rollout puts both pets and their owners into an uncontrolled genetic experiment without consent. “So says Nicholas Holcher, Miles per hour. So masters in public health. We don't know. Nobody tested it. Nobody did any studies. We don't have long term studies. We don't have short term studies. We just don't know. I'm a little scared. I really don't want to be a part of this.” And by the way, they're actually talking about spraying messenger RNA on our crops. How are we affecting our I feel like this is the everybody remember the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. I think I had to read it in high school. Was one of those required readings. Or what was the other book? 1984? Like, I feel like we're living in this dystopian universe where we just experiment with all these genetic things and we just throw it into the environment and throw it into our pets and throw it into people, and we don't know what the outcome is until we see. Are we all gonna go the way the dinosaurs? I don't know. Now I really sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are we all gonna like, is somebody gonna come along in a few thousand years and find fossil remains and try to figure out why we all died? I don't know. It's fine. It's fine. It's just a little nervous.” One speaker says they homestead: they raise their own chickens. They’re not treated with chemicals. Their dogs and cats don't get vaccinated with things that might shed into the environment, and they’re growing all their own organic fruits and vegetables. “Yep, I'm I'm I'm going that way. Y'all y'all do what you need to do. It's a little scary. I don't recommend that particular vaccine for your dogs. I I guess that's the bottom line. I don't know. Be careful what you eat.”

Speaker 0 states that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep vets in business. They assert that if your vet tells you your animal needs rabies shots, you should fire them. They claim all they’re doing is promoting poison so they can inject your animal, then your animal can come down with a debilitating disease, and then they have a patient for life. They define rabies as “There is no rabid dogs running around, and they're gonna get you in anything else.” They describe the first studies on rabid dogs as dogs that were locked in cages and went completely nuts, and allege the guy who created the rabies vaccine stuck it in the dog's head and said that the rabies vaccine worked after the dogs died. They assert that to this day, they are still injecting dogs for rabies, calling it a fake illness, to poison the dogs to have patients for life, calling it truly sick and twisted. They cite The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean as debunking this, and claim vets do the same thing as doctors—there to keep you as a patient for life. That is what they’re going to say about.

Speaker asserts that extremely dangerous self-amplifying replicon mRNA injections are currently being deployed for humans and animals worldwide. A few days ago, the UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics’ self-amplifying COVID-19 injection for adults over 18, and previously the European Union approved the same replicon injection for adults, so it is in the EU and the UK. Japan approved it in 2023, and India has approved these replicon injections as well, indicating rollout across the globe. In the United States, it is claimed that the USDA approved the self-amplifying mRNA particle injections for dogs and cats, specifically Novavax NXT by Merck, suggesting active injection into pets and potential shedding onto human owners in the US. The speaker states that the FDA fast-tracked an H5N1 bird flu replicon injection trial, raising concern given the alleged dangers of these products. The speaker emphasizes the potential for shedding of replicating genetic material from humans or from pets to humans, and the possibility that these replicating constructs could recombine with wild viruses to create chimeric mutants. They highlight a high rate of adverse events associated with the Arcturus Therapeutics injection, claiming that eighty-five percent suffered systemic adverse events and fifteen percent required medical attention. A recent study in Uganda is cited, alleged to have induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety-three percent of recipients, including thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia, with immune systems degraded and increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. The report also claims that eighty-five percent experienced vomiting and high fevers, and felt absolutely terrible. The speaker concludes that this self-amplifying assault on humanity needs to end, calling for these injections to be pulled from the market and banned for human use.

Interview with Doctor Faulkner, our homeopathic vet, discussed a new rabies vaccine called rabies dash NXT, which stands for rabies next, a self amplifying RNA vaccine for rabies for dogs. He said the problem with it, all the side effects are this exactly what you would see in a dog that has rabies. They've gone from tepid and mild to aggressive to biting to salivating to angry and all the different things that happen with rabies. I said, well, if that's an s a RNA vaccine, that means it will continue to replicate and make the imprint of rabies. Is that gonna be spread to humans? I mean, if your dog licks you, you know, licks your hand, your face, and all these other things. Is rabies gonna be spread to humans? He said nobody knows. Nobody's really looked at that. I said, oh, that's just great.

The speaker treats vaccine injuries, stating that 70% of their practice involves them. They claim rabies vaccines are among the worst. They were shocked to learn that there has been no canine strain of rabies in the US for 14 years, suggesting that dogs are being unnecessarily killed or restrained. The speaker believes that over-vaccination is occurring constantly. They assert that no vaccine is safe, and no vaccine is 100% effective.