TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A journalist is recording people marching against Trump. The journalist asks if Reid Hoffman and George Soros paid them to be there. The journalist states they can document stuff on the street and that the people got busted and are paid. One of the people tells the journalist to get out of here and leave, stating they are not welcome. The journalist claims to live there, but the other person repeats that they live in the city and demands the journalist leave.

In this video, the speaker is playing the piano in a public space when a group of Chinese individuals approach and tell him not to film them. The situation escalates, with the police getting involved. The speaker argues that he has the right to film in a public space and that it is a free speech issue. Eventually, the Chinese individuals and the police leave, and the speaker continues playing the piano. The video highlights the clash between different ideologies and the importance of free speech.

The speaker is filming at a public protest and refuses to stop recording despite being asked not to film people's faces. The other person argues that it's a public space and a newsworthy event, so they have the right to record. The situation escalates as they exchange heated words, with the speaker eventually agreeing to leave. The conversation is chaotic and ends with the speaker continuing to film while making references to "Rick and Morty."

The LAPD is moving on horseback, firing rubber bullets at protesters in the heart of LA. One person is heard saying, "Are you okay? No. Fuck it." Another person asks, "Are you okay?"

A journalist argues with a police officer who asks them to disperse from the area. The journalist asserts their right to report freely and questions the officer's authority to control who can be a journalist. The officer explains that they are asking the journalist to leave to prevent harassment and distress to the community. The journalist refuses to leave, stating that they are just doing their job. The officer warns that if the journalist doesn't leave, they may be arrested. The journalist accuses the officer of being a fascist and continues to argue while ordering breakfast. The video ends with the officer asking the journalist to leave again.

Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 are taking audio and video when Speaker 0 approaches and demands to know what they are photographing. Speaker 1 refuses to answer and asks Speaker 0 to leave them alone. Speaker 0 refuses, claiming they can't take photos on federal property. Speaker 1 claims Speaker 0 tried to hit them with their car. Speaker 2 says they witnessed the near-hit and that the photography is constitutionally protected. Speaker 1 threatens to have Speaker 0 arrested. Speaker 0 refuses to leave, stating they don't take orders from "schmucks." Speaker 1 tells Speaker 0 they made a mistake and should go home. Speaker 0 asks again what Speaker 1 is photographing. Speaker 1 again refuses to answer.

A person is videotaping what they claim is an active law enforcement scene and refuses to leave when asked by an officer. The officer threatens the person with arrest for interfering. The person states they are a citizen and will continue videotaping, claiming what is happening is illegal and not welcome in the community. The person states they are getting the officer's license plate number. The person claims that ICE is taking people off the street in their community.

Okay, here we go. An officer just assaulted that young man. I'm pretty sure of it. This is actually happening at CPAC. This is how they're treating J6ers. It's unbelievable. They just threw a bunch out again. Here they are. Look, there's Koi. Look here. Here's Jake. Here's Koi. I just got this all worked out for them to be here, and they assaulted this young man in the process. I got it on video. I have it.

Speaker 0 argues that what was described is that he went there to try to stop the law enforcement operation, and that all the video shows him doing is documenting it with his cell phone, which is lawful. The only time he appeared to interact with law enforcement was when they went after him as he was trying to help an individual who law enforcement pushed down. Speaker 0 asks where the evidence is to show that he was trying to impede the operation, noting that he was filming, which he says is legal in the United States of America. Speaker 1 responds that Dana was there in the scene and was actively impeding and assaulting law enforcement to the point, but adds that this is not illegal. Speaker 0 counters that Dana wasn’t impeding it; he was filming, which is legal. Speaker 1 asks not to freeze-frame adjudicate the moment and insists that Dana was there for a reason, and that reason was to impede law enforcement. Speaker 1 further argues that de-escalation techniques were utilized during this action, including physically trying to remove those from the law enforcement scene and the use of pepper spray, which is described as another de-escalation technique. He states that those techniques did not work.

The shields tear down the umbrella and someone gets hit with a pallet. A person is dragged and beaten in front of a plywood wall. No police or security are present despite the chaos lasting over an hour and a half. The lack of enforcement is appalling and may indicate future issues.

A person with a camera is confronted by security while filming. The security guard asks if the person has approval from the school to be there. The person admits they usually don't get consent from people they film. The security guard says someone complained, and this happens all the time. The security guard states that they can't stand there, even on the sidewalk, and demands they leave the property. The person filming says they are doing it for the public's right to know. They are escorted off the property by officers and state the officers should be escorting the president off the property instead.

The speaker is involved in a confrontation with someone, repeatedly telling them to step back and not touch them. Another person tries to intervene and calm the situation. The speaker continues to assert their rights to be in a certain area and questions why they are being told to back up. The conversation becomes heated and the speaker uses profanity. The video ends with the speaker expressing frustration and defiance.

A person filming audio and video is confronted by an individual who objects to being photographed on federal property. The person filming refuses to engage and asks the individual to leave. The individual refuses, stating they don't take orders from "schmucks" and claiming people can't be photographed. The filmer asserts their activity is constitutionally protected. The confrontation escalates when the individual allegedly tries to hit the filmer with their car. The filmer threatens to call the cops and have the individual arrested, while the individual demands they stop photographing people. A witness tells the individual to get in their car and leave. The filmer urges the individual to leave before making the situation worse, stating they have witnesses to the alleged assault. The individual refuses to comply, stating they don't take orders from "schmucks."

The video begins with Speaker 0 stating that they are allowed to film in a public place. Speaker 1 acknowledges this and says they don't have to talk. Speaker 0 insists on speaking and explains that they need to establish why Speaker 1 is in the public place. Speaker 1 questions what crime has been committed and Speaker 0 mentions that Speaker 1 is not wearing a face mask, which is an offense. Speaker 1 claims to be exempt, but Speaker 0 insists on seeing their exemption and proceeds to place Speaker 1 under arrest. Speaker 1 resists and a struggle ensues. The video ends with Speaker 1 being restrained by the police.

A person is recording a video outside a building and is approached by a security guard and a police officer. The person questions who they are and why they are being surrounded. The person refuses to talk to the police officer and threatens to knock him out. They demand to know the police officer's name and badge number. The person asserts that the police officer should stick to his job inside the building and not approach members of the public on the sidewalk. The person eventually tells everyone to go back inside and leave them alone.

"Police have now entered into the crowd." "We're not moving till something happens about this country." "Here's the man who was hit." "He's been cleaned up a little bit." "This guy was knocked out by the police." "It looks like he has a broken nose, blood gushing down his face, and now he's back." "He stood up." "He's just lying to you." "I'm not doing anything. I'm standing here." "I've seen what happened to this poor guy." "Don't do it again, mate. Honestly, don't do it again." "I'm a public citizen and a public fairway." "I'm a public citizen on a public highway." "Arrest me then." "Arrest me then." "You're gonna fuck the game on you."

A journalist is seeking clarity on rules of engagement after an incident. While filming, someone handed them a flyer, then a comrade told her to stop talking to them. The woman returned and allegedly grabbed at the journalist's camera and tried snapping his tampons. The journalist believes this was assault. The journalist is concerned about potential escalation if they encounter the masked woman again and wants to know her identity or have a record of the incident. They ask the police for help in identifying her. The police suggest going to 11 Division, but the journalist points out that this would require leaving the protest. The journalist feels the police should be able to at least identify the woman.

A group is blocking the police from leaving and threw garbage. People are trying to create a line to stop ICE and FBI. They are fighting to get the police out of the town. People are upset because ICE came through and took immigrants out of the city. One man was thrown by the police and keeps going back at them after being pushed. The police threw him down, and he keeps going after them.

An individual tells someone to stop what they are doing with their job and says, "Don't touch me," while the other person denies touching them. Another person intervenes, stating their hands are separate and urging everyone to let it go. This person then warns that they will be arrested and asserts they are not supposed to be there, claiming there is a law against their presence. They accuse the group of being outsiders bringing violence.

Police have now entered into the crowd. "We're not moving till something happens about this country." Here's the man who was hit. He's been cleaned up. He looks like he just. This guy was knocked out by the police. Who cares? It looks like he has a broken nose, blood gushing down his face, and now he's back. He stood up. It looks like he just survived The US. "He's just lying to you. He's just not pushing. He's pushing back. I'm not doing anything. I'm standing here." "I've seen what happened to this poor guy." He was standing down there with his back like you and me you and me are now. "Don't do it again, mate. Honestly, don't do it again." "I'm a public citizen on a public highway. Yeah. Arrest me then." "Arrest me then. You're gonna fuck the game on you."

A person claims to have been assaulted on the street and confronts the alleged attacker, recording the incident. Another person intervenes, stating that the alleged attacker should be arrested. The original person argues that their approach is justified because they were assaulted. The intervention continues to insist that the alleged attacker should not have brought their aggression onto a bus with passengers. The original person accuses the alleged attacker of being a hate criminal and demands their arrest. The intervention disagrees and suggests calling the police instead. The original person expresses a desire to live their life peacefully and asks to be left alone. The intervention expresses frustration and asks the original person to sit elsewhere. The original person eventually agrees and expresses a desire to avoid further conflict.

The speaker confronts someone filming in front of a building and tells them they don't have the right to film there. The person being filmed asks who the speaker is and why they can't film. The speaker insists that they don't have the right and threatens to knock them out. The person being filmed asks for the speaker's name and badge number, and the speaker provides it. The person being filmed tells the speaker to leave them alone and not give them orders on the sidewalk. The speaker tells them to go back inside and not bother them.

Speaker 0 confronts another person with repeated "Get the fuck out" and "Don't come back," insisting "Let me move. Let me get out" while being pushed toward the road and urged to "Fucking walk." The exchange includes "Stop it" and "Stop sticking your camera to people's fucking face," followed by "I didn't do anything" and "I have the right to be here. Okay. Did I say I have the right to be here. I have the right to film." The other person threatens violence: "You come back, I'm gonna fucking smoke you, dude," and "gonna smash that fucking camera." The scene ends with the claim: "DHS watching you right there lasered on you. You have a sniper lasered on you right now. I don't give a fuck."

Authorities instruct targeted arrests for an assault and warn that 'Don't interfere with officers. If you interfere with officers, you may be subject to arrest or use of force.' They tell people to leave: 'Leave with people. Alright? If you did hot shit, get out. Come back tomorrow. You're better, way more, way more effective outside of a prison cell. If you did hot shit, leave.' Officers are ordered to move traffic off public ways: 'You are ordered to move to the sidewalk.' A responder says, 'We're on it.' The scene ends with a hostile shout: 'Hey. Quit smiling, fuck boy. Fuck you. Fuck Fuck Fuck you. You. You.'

The speaker is live streaming a situation where some individuals are trying to circulate around while the police are not taking any action. The speaker mentions that they are filming because these individuals are trying to disrupt women's activities.