reSee.it - Related Video Feed

According to Speaker 1, the intelligence agencies hid the fact that Bin Laden was in Iran, not Afghanistan or Pakistan, to justify military action in the Middle East. This manipulation started under Clinton and continued under Bush Jr. Speaker 1 claims that intelligence agencies have tentacles around the world and don't answer to anyone, which is a problem for Trump. Speaker 1 alleges that they were targeted after questioning 9/11, resulting in an FBI raid on their daughter's house weeks before an election, which they believe was politically motivated to remove them from office. No charges were ever filed against the daughter, and boxes taken were returned unopened months later. Speaker 1 claims that the person who ran the campaign against them was managed by the staff director of Sandy Berger's company. Speaker 1 asserts that some individuals within intelligence agencies are making money from conflicts and vows to expose them.

The speaker mentions that the document was redacted to protect the source. They also mention that there are 17 voice recordings, two of which involve the current president. The speaker questions why this information was redacted and not given to the House Oversight.

Speaker 0: Somebody finally found the confiscated video that the FBI took on the day of nine eleven, where it was proving it wasn't a plane. It was a scutt missile. There was talk amongst the community because I've been awake for twenty years since this happened. That there was a scud missile. The witnesses were silenced. The person who had this tape that turned it over to the FBI, the FBI concealed this information. And as you can see, that is not a plane. That is a scud missile as originally thought. Fucking deep state cabal. You sons of bitches. We already those who knew, we already knew you did shit. But this was the last piece of the puzzle for the evidence. With that whole entire crap with the 09:11 report, they said it disintegrated. That is a scud missile. So Swedish satellite saw that there was a marking target, and that was completely put aside, and you all bought the lie. Heavenly father, let truth prevail.

An individual states they didn't get rich in Congress and questions how people like Biden and Obama acquired wealth while in public service. They claim many informed individuals, including former high-ranking officials from the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, and advisors to Obama, privately believe "the 9/11 report was just silly" and a cover-up. While these individuals are aware of the truth, they are unwilling to come forward publicly. The speaker asserts their credibility on the topic, noting their long-standing involvement and endorsements from figures like Donald Rumsfeld. They reiterate that those with access to real intelligence believe there is more to the events of 9/11 than what has been disclosed.

Joe Biden had meetings with people who supported the 9/11 hijackers, including Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the Pakistani ISI. The president's actions play a role in these events. After 9/11, Biden met with General Mohammed Ahmed of Pakistani ISI, who ordered a $100,000 wire transfer. Biden claims he met with him to deliver a warning about supporting the Taliban. However, Ahmed was allowed to go back to Pakistan without being questioned or investigated. This raises questions about why he was let go and why there was no investigation.

The transcript argues that Thomas Massey’s campaign is in “trouble” because it violated a “golden rule” of campaigning: never allow the public perception you sold to be dismantled, especially in the last few days. It claims Massey spent the last year creating a perception that he is a champion for transparency, and that once this narrative is dismantled, it “is gone forever” and cannot be restored. It says the campaign’s need to revert to that narrative is what they “wanted to happen last” in the final days. It also claims the “Gray Ops campaign” is trying to convince viewers that Thomas Massie did more to take down “p three DOs” than the entire Republican Party, calling it “the biggest lie they’ve ever told.” Donald Trump and his administration are said to have released 4,000,000 documents related to the Epstein files, described as 4,000,000 more documents than any other president before him. The transcript asserts that none of those documents contained incriminating information, and it gives two reasons. First, it claims that people close personal friends and political allies of those likely to be incriminated had controlled the files for two decades, implying they would not leave real incriminating information by the time the Trump administration picked them up. Second, it claims the Trump administration was forced by a law written and pushed and passed directly by Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna. It says Massie wrote the bill that created a legal umbrella requiring the Department of Justice to redact many names. It further states the bill required redacting names authorized under criteria established by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense and foreign policy and properly classified under that executive order, and that disclosure would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution. The transcript concludes by reiterating that Massie wrote the bill that required redacting the names that it says he spent a year trying to convince the public he was demanding transparency over.

Speaker 1 argues that "the core lie, is the nine eleven commission itself, which was an instrument, a political instrument of the Bush administration" run by "Philip Zellico," who "stage managed the explanation for nine eleven" so Americans would be convinced to invade Iraq; "he wrote the commission report with that in mind" and "before the investigation took place." He says "Chairman Tom Cain ... stage managed the entire thing and prevented investigators from looking into, like, core questions." He claims the CIA "was fully aware that many of the hijackers who committed nine eleven were in The United States," citing that "11 out of the 19 hijackers had visas for travel to The United States issued in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia" at "the moment that John Brennan was the station chief for the CIA in Saudi Arabia," and that "this is all documented" though the information was not shared with the FBI or the public, "and three thousand people died as a result." He states "Huge parts of the nine eleven story were left out of the commission report" and questions Building 7, urging accountability. The piece promises weekly episodes starting 09/11 at tuckercarlson.com.

I mean, if you're shorting American Airlines a week before nine eleven when no one knows it's coming, I think you should have to explain why you did that. And if you're shorting Barclays and and banks that were affected by nine eleven, why can't we know who you are? These are public markets, by the way. This is not private equity. This is publicly traded equities. So clearly, yes, there was foreknowledge. By the way, there was a team. This is according to the FBI. This is the FBI saying there was a team of clearly Intel connected foreigners who were arrested after nine eleven, as you well know, videotaping the terror attacks. I'm almost verbatim quoting from the FBI assessment of this. And the FBI determined that they apparently had foreknowledge of the attacks. So why can't we know more about that exactly? This is my country.

Speaker 0: Agreed with an Israeli request to stop the distribution of a book that contains some pretty damning information about the Israeli secret service, the Mossad, if it is true. Speaker 1: The most sensational claim in the book involves this bloody day, the Beirut Marine Barracks bombing. The book says Israeli agents kept vital information from US Marines that might have saved the lives of 241 Americans killed here. Israeli government sources deny this account. But according to the book, an Israeli informant saw a Mercedes truck being fitted with secret panels for explosives. Israeli troops were told to be on the lookout for the truck. But the book says the Israelis intentionally gave the Americans only a vague warning, not mentioning the kind or size of vehicle. The book says Israeli intelligence was willing to let the terrorists succeed to protect their sources and out of contempt for US intelligence. It says agents withheld information on US hostages for similar reasons. In Toronto today, the author was under a court ordered gag not to discuss the book or the case. Speaker 2: You see, there's two restrictions. There's one restriction that I can't talk about what I learned or have done in the Mossad, and the other restriction is I cannot talk about anything that's in the book. Speaker 1: Israeli officials confirm that Viktor Ostrovsky worked for the Mossad in the nineteen eighties. Alarmed by the contents of the book, they got it temporarily blocked in Canada and The United States. Speaker 3: It's a position of the Israeli government that the information contained in the book could very well lead to the identification of employees of the Mossad and could jeopardize their lives. Speaker 1: But the book's introduction says it does not name active agents and gives only initials. It does say that more than two dozen senior Israeli agents routinely gather intelligence in The United States. Late today, the book was put out for sale in New York after the court lifted its restraining order. The publishers claimed victory, but the Israeli embassy said it will still pursue its action against the author. John Martin, ABC News, Washington.

The first participant asks the second to identify who did each major event. For MLK Jr., the second participant says, “That was a CI operation because they considered him a dangerous communist. And but the FBI was bugging the, in churches where he was giving some of his speeches in churches. They were bugging the podiums and following him around. He was a top target, for elimination.” For JFK, the second participant states, “I think that was a CI hit. They they may have employed some mafia connections to carry it out because that was their mafia assassination program.” Concerning LBJ, the first participant notes, “LBJ was very involved in all that in Dallas. So,” and the second participant adds, “he an evil man.” The first participant affirms, “He was an evil man.” Turning to Pearl Harbor, the second participant claims, “They knew the attack was coming was coming. They knew where it was gonna happen in Pearl Harbor and when. And they they told no one, and they let it happen on purpose. That that's from the commander of the Pacific Fleet. I would say that's a pretty pretty credible witness.” He continues, “So, yeah, that that was a false admitted that. They admitted they had the and they heard it was gonna happen. And, you how know, else were you gonna get Americans to be on the side of this war that had nothing to do with us?” This leads to the discussion of 9/11. The second participant says, “My opinion. As a criminal investigator, as a former CI officer, nine eleven was not the act of a bunch of poorly flight trained terrorists that executed an unbelievably meticulous, piloting of those aircraft, even even pilots. There's there's pilots for nine eleven truth now, and they say, we could not have done that. Not possible.” He adds, “And then we go to the passport issue, and we go to the Tower 7, which was a controlled demolition.” The second participant further asserts, “You talk to any structural engineer, and and and I I have. And the fact I think George w Bush blacked out. I think it was 40 pages of the 09/11 report dealing with Saudi Arabia. So what wait a minute. This report was supposed to be for the American people on what happened, and you blacked all these pages out? What in the world?” He continues, “I do not think that it was a bunch of un poorly trained or untrained terrorists that did it. I think there was another source behind it. I think it was intentional, and I'm going just from a a criminal invest investigative perspective just looking at the evidence, what evidence we have, that that was an intentional act, And it would fall right into the MO that you and I are talking about.” He concludes that the event was “Horrible” and emphasizes that “the shadow government deep state or especially the CIA. It does not matter. Their pawns on their chessboard, they don't care that three thousand people were horribly killed that day, but it achieved the aim of gutting the US constitution, bringing in the horrific Patriot Act Mhmm. Giving the CIA unthinkable authority for secret prison prisons and torture beyond waterboarding and and secret renditions and all of that, the FBI, the ability to to, spy on Americans came out of the Patriot Act. So it was the perfect national security state, energizer that the Patriot Act was, and 70 of the congressmen and senators that read the Patriot Act didn't even read it. They just signed off on it without even reading the bill.”

The discussion centers on allegations that the nine/eleven commission has been obstructed in its ability to access full information from the White House, particularly regarding what the President knew and when he knew it about the September 11 attacks. The first speaker asserts that President Bush personally nixed the commission’s access to crucial documents in the White House, especially the presidential daily briefs. According to this speaker, these briefs “basically tell[ the] commission and the American people what the President knew and when he knew it in regard to the potential attack on nineeleven and the attack itself and the follow-up.” The claim is that the White House has “personally nixed that information coming to nineeleven,” meaning all members of the commission would not see the real, sensitive documents. The speaker characterizes the White House’s actions as a cover-up and describes it as slow-walking the process from the beginning, implying deliberate obstruction. The second speaker describes the commission as an independent body intended to examine why and how the 9/11 attacks occurred, what the President and the government knew, and when they knew it. When asked why the White House would not permit access to the documents, this speaker characterizes the White House as resisting greater scrutiny: “They don't want any more eyeballs to see their documents than they could possibly get away with. It's a scam. It's absolutely disgusting.” This speaker’s framing suggests an intentional effort by the White House to limit oversight and information flow. The third speaker adds a critical evaluation of the commission’s setup, stating that “the commission in many ways was set up to fail because we had, not enough money. We didn't have enough time.” This indicates a belief that structural constraints undermined the commission’s effectiveness and its ability to fulfill its independent mandate. Across the statements, the overarching claim is that there was deliberate resistance by the White House to provide the commission with full access to key documents, notably the presidential daily briefs, thereby impeding the commission’s ability to comprehensively determine what the government knew about the threats prior to and following the attacks. The speakers collectively portray a pattern of obstruction, cover-up, and insufficient resources that hampered the commission’s work.

"President Bush personally has nixed the effort of the nineeleven commission to get all the documents in the White House, especially the presidential daily briefs, which basically tell the commission and the American people what the President knew and when he knew it in regard to the potential attack on nineeleven and the attack itself in the follow-up." "He has personally nixed that information coming to nineeleven." "The truth of matter is the White House has played cover up and has slow walked this this game from the beginning." "It's a scam. It's absolutely disgusting." "We're an independent commission for an independent operational look at why nine eleven happened, what happened there, when the what the president and the government knew, and when they knew it." "We think the commission in many ways was set up to fail because we had, not enough money. We didn't have enough time."

We received a couple hundred pages of documents from the FBI, but a source indicated more evidence was in the Southern District of New York. I gave them a deadline, and thousands of pages of documents arrived. The FBI and Director Patel's team are reviewing them to determine why these documents were initially withheld. While redacting to protect victims is crucial, we aim for maximum transparency, believing Americans deserve to know the truth. The Biden administration claimed no one acted on these documents, but why were they hidden? This same principle of transparency applies to the JFK files and other cases. When we redact, we will clearly mark the specific lines and explain the reason, such as protecting a victim's identity or national security.

The transcript states that the voice of the hijacker on the hijacked planes’ voice recorder reveals that the accent of the hijacker matches an Israeli Hebrew accent. It then reports that FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC have confirmed that seven of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the September 11 crashes; they are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. It adds that an eighth accused Muslim died one year before the September 11 hijackings even occurred. The speaker then asks who stole their identities and why the FBI isn’t looking for them. It questions if the hijackers really were Muslims, why they would steal the identities of fellow Muslims and implicate them, and suggests they would be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis. It further asks whether, if the hijackers were Israelis, they would be likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims.

The speaker states the FBI handed over hundreds of pages of documents, but a source indicated more existed in the Southern District of New York. The speaker gave the FBI a deadline of Friday at 8 AM to release everything. Thousands of pages of documents arrived by the deadline and are now in the FBI's possession. Kash Patel and his team will produce a detailed report explaining why the documents were withheld. The speaker says the documents included flight logs, names, and victim names, but they are looking for the rest of the information. The speaker identified over 254 victims in phase one. The speaker says they believe in transparency and that America has the right to know. The speaker claims the Biden administration said no one did anything with the documents and questions why they were in the Southern District of New York. The speaker says national security and grand jury information may be redacted. The speaker says the public has a right to know about the JFK and Martin Luther King files as well. If something is redacted, the line will be noted, along with the reason for the redaction.

The speaker claims that the witnesses who had a tape showing a Scud missile were silenced and the FBI concealed this information. They believe that the 9/11 report was a lie and that the Swedish satellite footage showing a market target was ignored. The speaker expresses frustration and calls for truth to prevail.

According to a court filing, at least two of the 9/11 hijackers were recruited by a joint CIA-Saudi intelligence operation that was covered up. The lead investigator of the Office of Military Commissions, Don Conestraro, interviewed FBI agents involved in investigating 9/11 and preventing the attack. The hijackers attended an Al Qaeda summit in Malaysia, where the CIA broke into their hotel rooms and photographed their passports. They were then able to board a flight to LA without screening and were met by a Saudi intelligence officer who provided them with an apartment, transportation, and flight lessons. The CIA refused to inform the FBI about the hijackers, indicating they were CIA assets. This raises questions about the CIA's involvement and their failure to prevent the attack.

Speaker 0: I was impressed by the questions, and I think it helped him understand how I think and how we run the White House and how we deal with threats. Speaker 1: Mister president, critics suggested you wanted to appear jointly with the vice president so you could keep your story straight. Could you tell us what you think of the value of appearing together and how you would answer those critics? Speaker 2: First of all, look, if we had something to hide, we wouldn't have met with them in the first place. We answered all their questions. I came away good about the session. Speaker 3: And even the president and vice president agreed to meet with the commission, but with a catch. They insisted on meeting together behind closed doors and not under oath. Speaker 2: Mister president, why are you and the vice president insisting on appearing together before the nine eleven commission? Speaker 0: Because the nine eleven commission wants to ask us questions. That's why we're meeting, and I look forward to meeting with them and answering their questions

The speaker claims that a year before 9/11, they identified every Al Qaeda cell, including the New York cell, but the Able Danger team was stopped from sharing this information with the FBI three times. They assert that former FBI Director Louie Free stated this information could have prevented 9/11. They also allege that after criticizing the agency, the Pentagon's inspector general, John Crane, filed a whistleblower paper claiming he was told to lie to Congress. The speaker calls the 9/11 Commission a "cover-up," led by Philip Zelikow, who was allegedly handpicked by Condoleezza Rice. They claim Zelikow shut down Tony Schaeffer's office and tried to destroy his career after Schaeffer met with him in Afghanistan and had information about 9/11 in advance. The speaker states that the government bought and destroyed all copies of Schaeffer's book, "Dark Heart," because it named Zelikow. They also claim that the intelligence they received as vice chairman of a committee was not solid, and they formed a network of intelligence agency insiders who fed them raw data. They allege that intelligence agencies manipulate the media and play games with Congress. The speaker believes that some individuals within these agencies have become wealthy through their positions. They claim that after speaking out, the FBI raided their daughter's house, leading to their electoral defeat. They felt responsible for 9/11 because they knew it could have been prevented.

A recently released 2021 court filing reveals that at least two 9/11 hijackers, Al Hazmi and Almidhar, were likely CIA recruits in a joint CIA-Saudi intelligence operation. According to the lead investigator, the CIA monitored the future hijackers at an Al Qaeda summit in Kuala Lumpur, even photographing their passports. Afterward, the pair flew to Los Angeles, where Saudi intelligence officer Omar Albayumi, also a possible CIA asset, assisted them with housing and flight lessons. The CIA, operating through a unit called Alec Station, deliberately withheld information about Al Hazmi and Almidhar from the FBI, going so far as to forbid FBI agents from sharing information. The purpose of Alec Station was to recruit the hijackers via a liaison relationship. This inaction allowed the 9/11 plot to proceed, with the CIA directly responsible for the attacks.

Speaker 1 claims a legitimate investigation into 9/11 never occurred and questions how the perpetrators were identified so quickly. Speaker 1 alleges the Bush administration ignored intelligence, suggesting they wanted the attacks to happen, citing Condoleezza Rice's memo from August 6, which stated Bin Laden planned to use steel planes to attack buildings. Speaker 1 states that every war starts with a false flag operation. Speaker 1 references a BBC report that allegedly broadcast the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 before it actually happened, claiming the reporter spoke of the collapse 27 minutes before it occurred.

An unidentified speaker is told a demolition will cost $1,500,000,000.0. The speaker says their guys told them $150,000,000 was the maximum and that it would cost less to fly planes into the building and collect the insurance. The speaker asks Deborah to find out what kind of terrorism insurance they have on the towers. Another speaker proposes an idea to the vice president. The vice president asks if someone ordered a false flag operation and tells someone to pull it already. Another speaker says when France doesn't join, they're going to call them freedom fries. A passport was found at the plane crash site, belonging to a Saudi Arabian guy. One speaker says if you call it the global war on terrorism, you can fight everywhere. Another speaker says their father will think this is cool, like getting the band back together.

A recent court filing reveals that at least two 9/11 hijackers, Khaled Almidhar and Nawaf Al Hazmi, were part of a CIA-Saudi intelligence operation. The CIA monitored them during a major Al Qaeda summit in Malaysia in January 2000 but failed to inform the FBI of their presence in the U.S. After the summit, they entered the U.S. without screening and were assisted by Omar Albayumi, a Saudi intelligence officer posing as a civil aviation employee. The CIA's Alex Station, which operated outside the FBI's oversight, aimed to recruit these hijackers. This raises serious questions about the CIA's role in the 9/11 attacks, suggesting that they may have knowingly allowed the operation to proceed without intervention.

Speaker 1 discusses his involvement in 9/11-related inquiries after receiving concerns from families. He emphasizes the role of whistleblowers who fear disclosure of anonymity, noting that while his office is good at protecting identities, not every congressional office is. He credits investigative reporters for bringing information forward and explains that his involvement began when nine/eleven families approached him with a heavily redacted FBI report on Saudi involvement, asking for it to be unredacted. He mentions that Richard Blumenthal is the chairman of PSI in the last Congress and that the inquiry extended to topics like the PGA Tour’s deal with Live Golf and Saudi Arabia, but that those are private matters not to be intruded upon. He says, however, that due to the redacted FBI document about Saudi involvement, he started gathering information and is currently in a position to review it, with an invitation to the audience to share information, though with the expectation that information will be debunked by his staff. He notes his own background from Oshkosh, Wisconsin, and that he initially accepted the prevailing narrative about 9/11 but began receiving information from sources that challenged it, leading him to pursue a more open investigation. He stresses that his staff’s primary goal is to obtain information and debunk it, to poke holes in the claims, and that he does not want to avoid discussing the topic. He acknowledges there are many legitimate questions that he is willing to ask, starting with World Trade Center 7, a building he had not heard of before. He asks why it is so difficult to discuss these topics and why legitimate questions seem to be quashed, suggesting there is something unexplained that has not been disclosed. He mentions public reception, including hostile comments online, and notes that many Americans had never heard of World Trade Center 7. Speaker 1 describes the scene surrounding WTC7, including a BBC reporter on air describing its collapse while the building still appears to be standing behind her. He points to a video that appears to show a single perspective of the event and references a later interview with a controlled demolition expert who asserted it was controlled demolition, though this assertion predates the event. He emphasizes that the building collapsed on September 11, and there are unanswered questions. He recounts Graham McQueen’s investigation before his death, who compiled approximately 150 documented recordings from first responders and reporters on the morning of 9/11 who said they heard explosions. He states that the 9/11 Commission and NIST did not discuss these explosions. He mentions Barry Jennings, who was in Building 7, who had to evacuate, but could not gather because the stairwell between the 6th and 8th floors had been blown out.

This series argues the official nine eleven story is false. "That's the story. That story is a lie." It claims CIA and FBI failures and that "the CIA was running a false flag operation to recruit the hijackers," with "the remarkable lengths the CIA went to to protect" them. Relying on ALEC Station, the Hadah Home switchboard in Sana'a, Yemen, it shows visas "issued to facilitate an operation run by the Saudis and the CIA spying operation" and Omar Al Bayoumi, "'an array an employee of the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Washington, DC in their consulate in Los Angeles, California,'" who "convinced the hijackers to move to San Diego" and aided their settlement. The CIA allegedly blocked the FBI from being warned, a "zone defense" versus "man to man" approach, and "the 28 pages" were hidden, prompting a call for a new, honest investigation.