reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers around the issue of grooming and rape gangs, particularly involving predominantly Pakistani men and young white girls. One speaker emphasizes the need for accountability and public awareness, highlighting the complicity of local governments and social services. They argue that this is a cultural issue, pointing out differing attitudes towards women in some communities. The other speaker counters, stating that a significant number of these crimes are committed by white men and insists on addressing all perpetrators equally, regardless of their background. The conversation touches on the historical context of vilifying specific groups and the need for a balanced approach to justice.

Speaker 0 argues that the real risk in the US isn’t multiculturalism itself, but the influence of a multibillionaire who runs the largest social media platform in the world, which has become an echo chamber for “your ridiculous ideology.” He asserts that the UK public, and especially someone raised in multicultural, working-class Birmingham, should recognize that “there’s not a Muslim there who’s read the Quran and went, oh, you know what? I didn’t rule out sexual violence, so I might I might just crack on with that.” He questions the other speaker’s perspective, implying a disconnect from reality or a failing to understand religious studies, and suggests that the other person would benefit from taking a course in religious studies before continuing the discussion. Speaker 1 responds by dismissing the previous remarks as ad hominem attacks, suggesting that the argument is weak and implying the opposite side should still be able to present a strong case. He asserts that the young working-class girls who grew up in similar areas would beg to differ with the other speaker’s view. He states that he has read the Quran and, regardless of whether his interpretation is accepted by the other party, points to countries with significant issues related to child brides and the rape of young girls and children, arguing that this is a systemic cultural problem associated with Islam rather than something confined to the West. He further contends that the grooming gang phenomenon “is what contained primarily to Muslim men,” and he adds that it “really only started when you started seeing mass migrate,” tying the issue to migration patterns. In sum, Speaker 0 frames the conversation around the risk posed by a powerful social media platform shaping public discourse, tying concerns to multiculturalism and warning of insufficient religious literacy; he challenges the other speaker to engage with religious studies. Speaker 1 counters with personal experience and interpretation of religious texts, arguing that the sexual violence and grooming issues reflect a broader systemic cultural problem linked to Islam, which he claims has emerged in connection with mass migration and is not limited to Western contexts.

"Perhaps thousands of young women have been drugged, raped, and beaten across dozens of UK cities by men belonging to so called grooming gangs." "December 2020, British authorities charged 32 men in a grooming gang with 200 sexual exploitation offenses against eight girls, some as young as 13." "Most perpetrators convicted so far are reportedly Muslim. The majority of their victims are white." "because she was white, a non Muslim, a virgin, and didn't dress modestly, that she deserved to be punished." "She escaped a year later, becoming part of The UK's largest ever child sexual abuse investigation." "In her new book, Pray, Somali born women's rights activist Ayan Hirsi Ali argues that immigration and Islam are major factors threatening women's safety."

Speaker 0 asserts that specific issues like murder, rape, and pimping are happening in towns and cities and are unique to the Islamic community, not occurring within the Sikh or Jewish communities. While acknowledging the existence of white drug dealers and gangs, Speaker 0 claims certain problems, such as terrorism and hostile activity towards youth, stem solely from the Islamic community. Speaker 0 suggests this community is "spreading" these issues, leading to problems like groups of Muslim men congregating near school gates and targeting youth for pimping. Speaker 0 argues that while white people may commit similar crimes, it's not in the same manner or group dynamic, implying a cultural aspect within the Islamic community.

My name is Tommy Robinson, a free speech activist and journalist from Great Britain. Today, I discuss the issue of grooming gangs in the UK, particularly those involving Muslim men. I emphasize that this is not an attack on all Muslims but highlights a troubling pattern linked to specific communities. Over the years, numerous reports have documented the systematic abuse of young girls, often ignored by authorities due to political correctness. Victims have shared harrowing experiences, and despite evidence, many perpetrators remain unpunished. The media and government have largely failed to address this crisis, leading to a culture of silence. I urge for accountability and action to protect our children, as a society that cannot defend its youth has no future. Thank you for listening.

There are alarming reports indicating that over 250,000 young white girls have been victims of rape this century, predominantly by Muslim men. These girls often endure repeated abuse over many years. The chief constable of Northumbria has stated that grooming gangs are likely operating in every major city. What actions is the government taking to address this issue? Specifically, what measures are in place to prosecute those in authority who ignored these crimes due to fears of being labeled Islamophobic? Additionally, what support is being provided to help the victims recover mentally?

My name is Tommy Robinson, a free speech activist and journalist from Great Britain. Today, I discuss the issue of grooming gangs in the UK, particularly focusing on the connection between certain cultural practices and the exploitation of young girls. Over the years, there have been numerous reports and investigations revealing that these gangs, predominantly composed of Muslim men, have targeted non-Muslim girls for sexual exploitation. Despite evidence and testimonies, there has been a significant cover-up by authorities due to fears of being labeled racist. The establishment has failed to address this crisis, allowing the systematic abuse of children to continue. It is crucial to acknowledge and confront these issues openly to protect future generations. A society that cannot defend its children has no future. Thank you for listening.

Speaker 0 contends that there is no link between immigration and sexual violence against women and girls. They then raise a pointed question about grooming gangs, identifying them as being of largely Pakistani descent that are “blotting our communities,” and ask if there is anything the other speaker has to say about this issue. Speaker 1 responds by saying the question is perfectly valid, but notes that they have moved on to other topics. They request to stick with the subject at hand. They explain that they were not asked to come in, and that they have strong feelings about immigration, which they stated in their reply. They state clearly that they are not going to start injecting racial connotations into discussions about immigration or crime. The brief phrase “The woman behind” appears at the end, implying a note about a person present, but the sentence is cut off.

Labour is not addressing the grooming gang issue, fearing backlash from the Muslim community. Jess Phillips, now at the Home Office, has rejected a national inquiry into rape gangs despite the ongoing crisis, similar to past incidents in Rochdale. Reports detail horrific abuses, including young girls being gang-raped and even murdered. Both Labour and the Tories share the blame; while the Tories initially called for an inquiry, they previously refused one. The lack of action on this issue, affecting vulnerable young girls across the UK, is a national scandal that demands a full independent inquiry.

The speaker claims the government promised local inquiries into rape gangs but has not followed through. They state that at least 50 towns are affected, listing Peterborough, Derby, Birmingham, Nottingham, Leicester, Rotherham, Rochdale, and Preston as examples. Another speaker expresses concern over the lack of focus on individual victims, instead listing towns and principalities. They question why those who speak about the "rape gang crisis" are ostracized, citing Tommy Robinson's imprisonment for contempt of court as an example. They suggest this is part of a plan to destabilize the Western world, particularly the Anglosphere, by creating moral confusion and uncertainty about fundamental concepts like gender, family, and even the definition of rape. They reference an Olympic ceremony as an example of this moral decay.

The speaker criticizes the government's handling of rape gang inquiries, stating that local inquiries are now minister-led instead of independent. Funds for inquiries are now opt-in, and some local leaders deny the need for them. The speaker claims that victims are predominantly white, and perpetrators are predominantly Muslim men of Pakistani heritage, suggesting racial and religious aggravation in some cases. They cite instances of institutional failure, including a social worker attending a wedding between a 14-year-old victim and her abuser, and a welfare rights officer being the ringleader of a rape gang. The speaker questions why no one has been convicted for covering up these rapes and calls for a dedicated unit in the National Crime Agency to investigate collusion and corruption, including within the police. They highlight a case where a father was arrested for trying to rescue his daughter from abuse. The speaker advocates for a national inquiry, quarterly ethnicity data publication, termination of parental rights for convicted sex offenders, and harsher sentences for grooming gang members. They share a graphic account of a 13-year-old gang rape victim. They question why the government won't investigate the full extent of the issue.

Reports indicate that there may be around 250,000 young white girls who have been victims of rape this century, predominantly by Muslim men. These girls often endure repeated abuse over many years. What is the government's response to the chief constable of Northumbria, who suggests that grooming gangs are likely active in all major cities? Additionally, what actions are being taken to hold accountable those in authority who ignored these issues due to fears of being labeled Islamophobic? Lastly, what measures are in place to provide mental health support and compensation for the victims?

The speaker asserts that discussions of child abuse and child trafficking are avoided in the UK Parliament, implying that avoidance signals a problem. They claim there is no separate crime of satanic child abuse in the UK; they say it’s simply child abuse, and suggest that the Netherlands similarly erases the subject. The speaker relates local discoveries in Leicester, described as the nearest city to their area, where they found extensive child abuse linked to both historic and current politicians and to the police. They state they gave evidence against the head of police about “industrial child trafficking.” A central claim is that there is industrial-scale trafficking of children from Ukraine via Moldova to the UK for sexual abuse and organ harvesting. The speaker says this information came from two Ukrainian secret service agents who independently reported the same scheme, without knowing each other. They alleged that Ukrainian secret services collected children during the conflict in the Donbas and handed them over to UK secret services. The two informants reportedly named individuals and were appalled by the task of collecting children for trafficking. The speaker recounts that one whistleblower was killed in a cafe when a bomb was placed under his table, and the second survived a car bombing after being warned by a car park camera clip showing the explosion as he approached his car. They claim the whistleblowers named people very close to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his regime, asserting that those individuals purportedly benefit financially from the war by enabling child trafficking. Further claims include that there is more money in child trafficking and sex trafficking than in drugs or weapons because of the trafficked children’s organs. The speaker contends that the trafficking scheme involves selling the children multiple times, and that victims disappear after organs are harvested, which is why victims are not found in the end. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the alleged connection between wartime activity, Ukrainian whistleblowers, assassination attempts, and a broader network that allegedly profits from child trafficking and organ harvesting.

Speaker 0 notes that grooming gangs have obviously been found in many cities and towns around the country, but there haven’t been many prosecutions in London. They say, “this is happening anywhere and the only reason why it’s not being found is that people aren’t looking.” They ask, “Are you looking in London for grooming gangs in London in order to prosecute people? Because if it’s going on in cities like Oxford and Bristol and Peterborough and Aylesbury, smaller places, it’s surely going on in London as well on a large scale.” Speaker 1 seeks clarification, asking, “Can I just be clear chair, is the inference that because of my faith or my ethnic origin I’m not seeking to follow these crimes?” Speaker 0 responds, “No. I’m asking you because you’re the Police and Crime Commissioner.” Speaker 2 interrupts, addressing Assembly member Curtin, saying, “I think you you’re pretty much drifting now on to drifting off the subject itself so can I just ask you to stick to the topic and ask a relevant question please?” Speaker 0 counters, explaining, “Well Chair I mean I was originally asking about Black Lives Matter and then the mayor started talking about slavery and the questioning is developed.” Speaker 2 reiterates, “But you’re still going off the tangent now so can you please be cautious about that and not ask Chair.” Speaker 0 responds, “If you want to disallow my question that’s your prerogative.” Speaker 2 then states, “Well I will use that then. Thank you very much. I’m going to move on now to the questions to the mayor on the priority order. The first question is number 1754.”

Anne Cryer attempted to assist families whose daughters were victims of Asian on-street grooming, where the offenders were primarily from the Pakistani community. She believed the police and social services were hesitant to intervene due to fear of being labeled racist. A local Muslim counselor represented Anne to the elders, hoping they would discourage the behavior as un-Islamic, but they declined. One speaker suggested a possible link to Islam, citing the Quran's allowance of taking sexual slaves, while another speaker refuted this interpretation. He stated that Islam is against grooming, child abuse, and any form of abuse. Another speaker mentioned imams delivering sermons against grooming and highlighted the increasing severity of sentences for such crimes. Anne believes the Muslim community could have done more to address the groomers.

Maggie Oliver, a former police officer, discusses her experience with the Rochdale grooming gangs and the failures of the police and criminal justice system to address the issue. She highlights that the majority of the offenders were British Pakistani Muslim men, but emphasizes that the problem goes beyond ethnicity and is about protecting vulnerable children. Oliver calls for a national conversation and honest dialogue about the issue, as well as systemic changes within the police and criminal justice system to better support victims and hold offenders accountable. She also encourages support for her charity, the Maggie Oliver Foundation, which helps survivors of abuse.

A speaker argues that allowing young men from countries where women aren’t treated as equal to live in four-star hotels and work illegally leads to attitudes toward women that are completely different and have appalling social effects. A second speaker recounts a case in Warwickshire, England where a 15-year-old girl was raped by two asylum-seeking Afghan men. The attackers’ lawyer blamed the assault on cultural differences, saying his client was not used to a society where women are free and deemed equal to men. The speaker says this defense illustrates why those young men shouldn’t have been in that country in the first place, and suggests that a similar mindset should be applied in the United States to prevent such things from happening here. The speaker asserts that if one sees someone getting hit by a car, it should remind us not to walk into the road, implying we should act to prevent harm before it occurs. The argument continues that action is needed now, not once it becomes widespread in the United States. This is offered as a justification for borders and for ICE, and a warning against those who advocate getting rid of ICE or removing borders. The position is that borders and immigration enforcement are necessary to keep the country sustainable economically, arguing against importing “the whole world.” The speaker contends that immigration should be controlled to prevent overwhelming the systems, and that people who do not share the country’s cultural values should be kept out or removed and sent to another country. The speaker then promotes a free email newsletter, noting it is sent every morning around 7 AM Central and occasionally covers specific topics in more depth. The link is stated to be in the speaker’s profile; readers are invited to subscribe. In closing, the speaker signs off, indicating they will see the audience in the next video.

My name is Tommy Robinson, a free speech activist and journalist from Great Britain. Today, I address the issue of grooming gangs in the UK, particularly those involving Muslim men. There is a direct link between certain scriptures and the crimes occurring in our communities. For over 40 years, these gangs have targeted non-Muslim children, with reports of thousands of victims. Despite investigations and evidence, there has been a significant cover-up by authorities due to political correctness and fear of being labeled racist. The establishment has failed to protect our daughters, and the media often avoids discussing these issues. We must confront this reality and demand accountability to ensure the safety of our children. A society that cannot defend its children has no future. Thank you for listening.

Former Labour adviser Scarlett Maguire and political commentator Amon Bogle discuss front-page claims about the grooming inquiry, framing it as sabotage by Labour and a government-controlled process. - Speaker 1 (Amon Bogle) says the Telegraph front page alleges the grooming inquiry was sabotaged by Labour, and argues the inquiry from the outset was a follow-up of a cover-up spanning three decades, noting Labour initially refused a national inquiry. He asserts the government is manipulating the inquiry by refusing victims and survivors the chance to name perpetrators as Pakistanis, and by preventing examination of religious aspects of the abuse. - Speaker 2 (Scarlett Maguire) contends the issue is not an “Asian grooming gangs” problem but a Pakistani problem in the UK, with the vast majority of perpetrators from Mirpur in Pakistan. She says two women removed themselves from the inquiry because they were being silenced by the government from looking into race. - Speaker 0 (host) remarks on the broader fear of addressing the issue, recounting community knowledge of grooming in shops, gyms, and corner shops, and says he knows the abuse continues and no one is doing anything about it. - Speaker 2 adds that the country has been too scared to discuss the perpetrators, noting that police, social workers, and care workers were afraid of being labeled racist if they spoke out. - Speaker 3 (another participant) notes that there were conflated timelines and that early on, victims faced police or social workers who could be perceived as perpetrators in some cases. He mentions Kirsty Dahmer as the person who first brought grooming cases to court and reopened cases that had been closed, stressing the difficulty of running any inquiry that listens to all parties. - Speaker 3 emphasizes the challenge of conducting an inquiry where social workers and police are involved, and argues that victims and vulnerable young women in care were abused by social workers, the men who did it, and later by the police. He underlines the horrific nature of these events and notes that what happened is still happening today. - The discussion notes the ongoing impact on young women in care, with a final, emotive remark that reading a certain girl’s book would break one’s heart, signaling the lasting harm and urgency of the issue.

The Muslim community has been notably silent regarding the reported rapes of young British girls by predominantly Muslim men, with a recent House of Lords speech revealing that 250,000 girls have been victimized this century. The audible gasp from the chamber occurred when the culprits were identified as Muslims, highlighting a reluctance to confront these crimes. The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has been in office since 2016, raising questions about his awareness of the situation. Meanwhile, Keir Starmer, the current Prime Minister, oversaw the Crown Prosecution Service during a time when many rapists evaded justice, while fathers attempting to rescue their daughters faced arrest. Tommy Robinson has long warned about these grooming gangs but is currently imprisoned for contempt for exposing the truth.

The Rape Gang Inquiry report has been released as a 219-page document, and the speaker says they have not read it all but highlights concerns about its methodology and accuracy. They recall advising Alastair Harrison last year that the report needed proper methodology and clear terms of reference to withstand scrutiny, ideally created by someone with expertise in statistical analysis and research methods. The speaker says Harrison refused to pay for this work and claimed a lawyer would handle it for free. According to the speaker, the report does not include a lawyer writer for free; instead it lists Josh Firm (from the Lotus Eaters podcast), Charlie Downs, and Harrison Pitt, whom the speaker says are not lawyers. The speaker argues that because of this, the report also did not do proper research. They point to page 11, describing repeated tactics and claiming the report states that girls as young as 11 were trafficked across “county lines,” explaining that the speaker interprets “county lines” as phone lines. They argue that “county lines” refer to how urban drug dealers move drugs into rural areas using phone lines that can be called to obtain drugs, and they say one cannot traffic someone over a “county line” unless it involves phone lines. The speaker connects these claimed misunderstandings to the report’s ability to understand “grooming gangs,” describing grooming gangs as criminal cartel enterprises closely aligned with drug networks, and saying the same alignment is discussed in Alexis Jay’s 2014 report on Rotherham. They reference Andrew Norfolk’s reporting starting in 2011, which led to scrutiny of the council and resulted in Alexis Jay being hired to write her report. The speaker then describes Alexis Jay’s chapter focusing on Angie Heal, who they say was hired in 2002 by South Yorkshire Police to look at drugs in Rotherham. The speaker claims Heal quickly found vulnerable children involved in the drugs trade, warned the police to safeguard children by examining the drugs connection, and was ignored, with the report purportedly buried. They say subsequent reports in 2003 and 2005 followed, and that Heal quit after no action was taken. The speaker concludes that, based on the inquiry report’s line about county lines, the earlier drug-and-grooming connection identified by Alexis Jay has not been incorporated. They also mention that the report includes content about Muslims described as “how awful the Muslims are,” characterizing it as vague and suggesting a larger discussion will follow.

The speaker asserts that hundreds of elderly Swedes are being raped and abused by migrants in their own homes. He states that, as an example, “a migrant was convicted for raping a 100 year old, and because of legislation that you endorse, he's allowed to stay in my country.” He connects this case to broader claims about policy and legislation endorsed by the addressed party, implying that those laws enable such individuals to remain in Sweden despite the crimes. The speaker extends the accusation to younger generations, claiming that daughters are sexually harassed and abused by migrant males when they go to the mall, take the bus, or walk home from school. He describes a pattern involving “migrant males” and asserts that these incidents occur in commonplace public and everyday settings, stressing the perceived pervasiveness of the problem in daily life. Beyond individual crimes, the speaker uses the phrase “generation prey” to characterize Swedish youngsters as being humiliated and robbed by predators who were imported by the addressed party. This framing suggests a deliberate influx or policy choice resulting in harm to the younger generation. He emphasizes that the other side “doesn’t wanna talk about this,” presenting the topic as one that is being avoided deliberately by the addressed group. The speaker contrasts this alleged avoidance with what he describes as virtue signaling about anti-discrimination, portraying the other side as focusing on symbolic gestures rather than addressing the alleged harms. Toward the end, the speaker tells the addressed party to “go home already” and asserts that they “did enough damage.” He then calls for a primary action from “us and the right” to clean up the mess, positioning himself and his allies as the group capable of resolving the situation. The overall rhetoric centers on a perceived mismatch between the harms described (sexual violence against elderly individuals, harassment of women, and harm to youth) and the policies or stances of the addressed party, which the speaker frames as insufficient or evasive. The message combines specific criminal cases, broad social harms, and a critique of policy dialogue to argue that the problem is both real and inadequately addressed by those in power, while urging supporters to take action.

A speaker recounts their accidental six-year investigation into grooming gangs and extremism, starting with concerns about a convicted sex offender leading a local mosque. They allege the chairman had a block vote and the mosque's management was tied to the Labour Party. Public funds were used to secretly fund the mosque, which allegedly supplied postal votes. They claim this arrangement exists nationwide, with the Labour Party aware and potentially welcoming it for votes. The speaker says that grooming gangs controlled votes and were key community figures. They allege a Labour Party source revealed a grooming gang member was "one of ours." They accuse Jim McMahon, now a secretary of state, of conspiring to hide grooming gangs. They claim a dossier of emails proves this conspiracy. They say a whistleblower was suspended by the Labour Party for revealing information. An inquiry was launched but failed to speak to a single survivor. The speaker believes the police are partners in covering up these crimes.

My name is Tommy Robinson, a free speech activist and journalist from Great Britain. Today, I discuss the issue of grooming gangs in the UK, particularly those involving Muslim men. I emphasize that while not all Muslims are involved, there is a troubling connection between certain interpretations of Islamic scripture and the abuse of young girls. Over the years, many reports have documented the systematic exploitation of non-Muslim girls, often ignored by authorities due to political correctness. Victims have shared harrowing testimonies of their experiences, highlighting a culture of silence and complicity. Despite the evidence, the establishment continues to downplay the issue, leading to a lack of accountability for perpetrators. I urge society to confront these realities and protect our children, as a society that fails to defend its youth has no future. Thank you for listening.

The speaker presents statistics, urging viewers to verify them using their phones. In Pakistan, 40% of marriages are between first cousins. In Yemen and Iraq, girls can be married at nine. Saudi Arabia punishes women with death for witchcraft. 98% of women in Somalia have undergone genital mutilation. Renouncing faith, adultery, and homosexuality can result in the death penalty under Sharia law. Afghanistan restricts women's freedoms, and polygamy is legal for men. Rape victims may be jailed for sex outside marriage. The speaker contrasts multiculturalism in homogeneously European nations with what they consider gentrification or colonization elsewhere. They cite the popularity of the name Mohammed in England and increased bombings in Sweden. A Swedish study showed that 79% of asylum-seeking refugees returned to visit their home countries. The speaker believes these trends are intentional, not due to incompetence. They argue that adopting Sharia law and Muslim practices leads to morally abhorrent laws. The speaker concludes that governments provide resources to migrants while disliking their own citizens.