TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

During the measles outbreak, I promised governor Abbott to send money and aid to Texas, but this individual blocked that money for a month. We then sought the vaccine safety data link—the data CDC supposedly uses to assess vaccine harms—but for seven months he stonewalled us. He also runs VAERS, the surveillance system for injuries, which, according to CDC's own study, captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. This is malpractice. These people are the people who ordered our children to walk around in mass. They're the people who closed our schools, imposed social distancing with no science, and shut down our businesses, and they need to go. The Trump administration is gonna make sure that happens. You know, secretary, you

"I broke their ass." "I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before." "The average development timeline for the vaccine, including clinical tests and manufacturing, can take eight to twelve years through operation warp speed." "We're doing it in less than one year." "This is five times faster than the fastest prior vaccine development in history." "It works incredibly well." "Ninety five percent, maybe even more than that." "Three other vaccines are also in the final stages of trial." "They'll arrive within a few weeks, and they will also be mass produced, the delivery will be very rapid." "I was never for mandates. I was I thought the mandates were terrible." "Current data shows us that it's the unvaccinated that are contributing to why it's lingering." "Take credit because we saved tens of millions of lives."

The speaker frequently called the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Massachusetts, who worked for a Republican governor. The Secretary asked if they would allow professional football, and the speaker responded that they would not. The Secretary replied that neither would they. The speaker also had conversations about when Massachusetts would consider easing restrictions, with the state official suggesting "next Monday."

I often connected with other state leaders on a personal level to share knowledge. One person I frequently spoke to was the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Massachusetts, who worked under a Republican governor. We had a conversation about whether to allow professional football during the pandemic, and we both agreed to not permit it. These types of discussions were common among us.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

The interviewer was given 4 questions by the White House to ask the governor. The questions were about accomplishments, progress in the state, election stakes, debate performance, and voter engagement. The governor approved the questions sent by the White House. The interviewer questioned the effectiveness of sending questions in advance to showcase the president's abilities.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is a new leading cause of death and disease in almost every country worldwide, with the exception of regions that have not taken the shot as aggressively—specifically mentioning Africa and a few Eastern European countries like Bulgaria and Latvia as the only places where death is less than expected. He states that since COVID and the vaccines, there has been an excess mortality of six percent, describing it as dramatic. He argues that if governments were legitimate, and they perceived a six percent excess mortality, they would come together to address it, rather than collaborate in a “scam on the population with the coronavirus operation,” which he claims was funded under the previous administration. He mentions Anthony Fauci in connection with this sentiment, describing Fauci in a way that aligns with the view that the response to the pandemic included a push for vaccination and other measures. The speaker then references Paul Alexander, described as an epidemiologist from Canada who was hired by Trump as an adviser. He asserts that Alexander “gave Trump very different advice” from what he characterizes as the prevailing or leg-based approach, which included opposition to lockdowns and other interventions. The speaker paraphrases Alexander’s alleged guidance as: don’t lock down the population, don’t put diapers on people’s faces, don’t try to vaccinate Rio of the pandemic, calling these positions insane. He also says, “Oh, and by the way, it’s not really a pandemic.” Regarding personal connections, he notes: “I haven’t met Donald Trump myself personally. I cannot give you any personal feedback on my friend Paul Hess and he said, he’s a good man and he was due by Fauci,” adding a brief, non-specific personal comment about Paul Hess, and promising a bit of feedback on that matter.

Following an armed insurrection, the speaker calls for the resignation of the Capitol Police chief but wants the focus to remain on the President. There will be an after-action review, but the speaker does not want the review to be on par with the insurrection and impeachment. Schumer is reportedly going to fire the Senate Sergeant at Arms. The speaker states that they can pull the card out for Q&A if Audrey finishes the card. They can say they will call for something, but they don't know because they don't have all the blue dogs with them on this subject. Someone mentions that a person briefed on a plan with numbers and stakeholders signed off on it. Another person says that in a conversation, someone was very transparent about underestimating the crowd size and the president's influence. The speaker asks if they will stay there all day or until the National Guard arrives.

The speaker, as a spokesperson, feels uncomfortable answering questions about the president's mental state. However, in their experience over the past 2.5 years, they have not seen any signs of concern regarding the president's lucidity, understanding of context, or command of facts and figures. They mentioned a recent incident where the president asked for information they didn't have, showing that when he lacks information, he expects to be provided with it.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made a difficult decision to protect public health.

I don't think there's been transparency. Routine announcements are being made about findings, and questions are being invited daily. But providing data for the evidence that is being presented isn't happening. The White House has provided information, but these claims seem to be dismissed. Information is being provided; it just isn't believed.

Okay, so the richest guy in the world is on our team. I know that's a tough pill to swallow if you are competitive, but it's true. I tried to find someone smarter than him, believe me, I searched everywhere, but I couldn't do it. For the good of the country, we settled on the best person for the job. Thanks for having me.

Speaker 0 will respond if asked, but not in a park due to an active diversion. A card can be used for Q&A if Audrey finishes it. They can't say they want P2, but will call for it, stating they don't know because not all relevant people are present. Speaker 2 states that someone was transparent about their opinion of certain states, believing they underestimated the crowd size and the president's influence on Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0 adds a further comment.

The conversation centers on preparation and concerns surrounding a decision or briefing. Parked in a location because a diversionary is active, with discussion about whether to pull a card out for Q&A once a card is finished. There is acknowledgment that they cannot definitively decide on certain wording because not all stakeholders (“blue dogs”) are present. One speaker notes they are finishing up and references “the ground,” indicating finalization of points or a plan. They suggest that the plan was the result of a briefing with numbers and that stakeholders have signed off, but there is anxiety about the president’s stance or position. Regarding the president, one speaker remarks that the president is not bad “at the fourteenth,” implying a view of performance around a specific date or milestone, but another adds that the president has always been skeptical, particularly of certain issues or actors. They describe the president as having terrible relationships with the union and not great handling of the coronavirus pandemic with the workforce. They acknowledge some positive aspects: the president has hired well at the lower ranks and has done some things well on the operational side, but characterize him as not a strong leader overall. The discussion also notes that the president is a Secret Service figure. In a prior conversation with him just before the meeting, he was very transparent about his views on other states he might order, which were underestimating crowd size and underestimating the president’s influence on Saudi Arabia. The transcript ends with a commitment to further announcements.

The speaker emphasizes that to understand the situation, we should consider what Jack Keane is saying. We have one aircraft carrier strike group, plus land-based air power and a lot of air defense missiles on the ground, and a lot of air power there, but there are no ground troops. Don Rumsfeld had about 300,000 total ground troops at his disposal, and we went in on the ground and defeated the regime in about a month. There was a profound amount of air power, much more air power than exists in The Gulf right now, and altogether there was a lot more air power then, yet we still underestimated them. We defeated them militarily in about a month, but then an insurgency rose up afterward because you can’t kill everybody, which is what happened. Jack Keane, Dan Raisin Cain, and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff—the man Trump has talked about—are highlighted as significant military leaders. The question is how many ground troops does he have available? Nada. And you are talking about destroying the civilian and military leadership the way Don Rumsfeld successfully did. He did...

What this person has done is unbelievable. He's found hundreds of billions of dollars in fake contracts; I even read a tiny portion of them the other night. The money they're spending is a scam, and it's all coming back to the people who made those deals. He's also made people realize how many people should be cut. Instead of the usual 4% workforce reduction, he suggests 50%, 60%, even 70%. He's done a great job but is paying a price for it. Despite the personal cost, he's a real patriot opening a lot of eyes.

Speaker 0 notes they will park momentarily because the diversionary is active. Speaker 1 confirms understanding and says they can pull the card out, but if they’re going to finish the card they can pull it out for Q and A. Speaker 0 adds that they cannot say they want something; they can say they’ll call it, but they don’t know yet because not all the blue dogs are with them on this subject. They suggest looking at the words they’re using and ask what else is on the agenda. Speaker 1 says he’s finishing up. Speaker 2 shifts to discussing the ground and the plan: it was the plan they briefed on with the numbers, with stakeholders who have signed off on it. There is some anxiety about the president. Speaker 0 remarks that the president isn’t bad at the fourteenth. Speaker 2 clarifies that the individual in question was on their first choice before today, but not today; he has always been skeptical—always skeptical of some things. The speaker notes this person’s terrible relationships with the union and asserts that he has not been great in handling the coronavirus pandemic with the workforce. They acknowledge that he has done some good things, such as hiring well at the sort of third-tier rank and some operational improvements, but characterize him as not a strong leader. Speaker 0 adds that the person is, after all, a Secret Service guy. Speaker 2 continues: in their conversation with him immediately before this meeting, he was very transparent about what he thought of other states that he may order. He believes those states were underestimating the crowd size and underestimating the president’s influence on Saudi Arabia. The speaker notes that further announcing... (the thought trails off here).

Speaker 0: All your great videos from Air Force One. But tell the American people, from your perspective, you got a view none of us did, what is it that we didn't get to see about that trip that you got to experience when it relates to president Trump? Speaker 1: It's actually very surreal because a lot of people said that president Trump couldn't get this done. Couldn't get it done. MAGA knew deep down that if anybody could get this deal done with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Marco Rubio and that great team that it would be president Trump. And we're on the plane going out. We all knew this was a historical moment. There was a great sense of pride on the plane, know, checking in on the president up in his office. You know, just he does so much reading and consuming of information. He knew how real the moment was too. Then when we entered out into the Middle East and you had the f sixteens escorting the plane in, which has happened before, but it was just it was a great feeling that the president of The United States, the leader of the free world, Donald j Trump, was there on a mission that he wanted to complete, you know, that he talked about and talked about and talked about. And everybody said, no. No. No. And he ended the war. And it it's absolutely incredible. You know, millions of lives saved amongst all these wars being ended. 20 hostages coming home. Just think about it. If if president Trump was not in office, this would still be going on. Speaker 0: It was historic for sure. There's no doubt about it. You were announced last weekend as the head of PPO, presidential personnel. So for the American people, maybe give them a sense of what this job actually entails, what you do, and why it is so important to the American people, so important to national security, and really the future of the country. Speaker 1: It it was an honor for the president to ask me to take this, additional job on. PPO is responsible, for vetting, interviewing, and bringing in candidates, political appointees to all of these agencies throughout the government. And something that we really wanna keep an eye on, which has been done, is, you know, bringing people with the values of the president that want to complete his agenda, making America great again, America first policies. I work very closely with all of the cabinet members, or I will be working very closely. So the communication you have with the cabinet members is very important in staffing up their agencies with political appointees. PPO also oversees ambassador appointments all around the world. So we have those to fulfill. We're also responsible for US Marshals and fulfilling those obligations all around the country. Work very closely with the DOJ on that front. So as I said, I'm learning every day that passes. I'm a quick learner, and I've hit the ground running. Speaker 0: As it relates to The Middle East, since we just talked about that, obviously, people are really excited about what happened there, and they wanna see more forward progress. Do you come in on that? What is it that you're gonna be able to do from this office to help implement phase two? Speaker 1: It's a great question and and things that actually came up yesterday in a couple of meetings. So that's my learning process. But we will need to fulfill, special envoys that are that are gonna be out there as well as oversight of the rebuilding of Gaza, and there'll be commissions that will be created in which we'll assist in. And with that, I would work with secretary of state Marco Rubio, Steve Witkoff, who is just such a great, great, great man. Love the guy. As well as, you know, Jared is very involved in getting this done as well. So it's really a team effort, and I'm willing to put forth the office with anything we can assist with in in getting the job done and fulfilling obligations out there to to support their mission in in completing each phase. Speaker 0: Well, something else that this administration has been very successful at doing is a crime crackdown. What else are you involved with from PPO that can help, you know, facilitate more of this crime crackdown all across the country? I imagine you guys have a role in that too. Speaker 1: We do. We do with fulfilling judgeships, within districts. US marshals, like I mentioned earlier, the US marshals are absolutely, incredible in what they do. And it's just getting leadership in each district, within each community, county, and state, throughout the country. So we'll fulfill all of that. And we'll we'll work with all entities. It is a team effort, and you see it every day. It's an atmosphere of where everybody wants to work together. I tell you behind the scenes in these cabinet meetings and in these meetings that take place in the Oval, everybody's on the same page marching in unison to deliver the president's, you know, agenda and and his goals in making Washington DC safe again, in making Memphis safe again, Chicago. How can these guys like Chicago how could they not want to make Chicago safe again? I'll understand it for the life of me. How these people do not want to work with this administration. And I'm talking Pritzker, and I'm talking Newsome. How and why? Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's it's sad because it's hurting the residents of their cities and states. So, Dan, as we sit here in Washington DC right now, the government is still shut down. What do you make of the priorities of the Democrat party? Speaker 1: It makes absolutely zero sense. There are more issues and problems in in this world, and they decide to fight to give illegal immigrants health insurance, and they're keeping the entire government closed down. And and I joke and I say, what? The government's closed down? For the past two weeks, this White House and other agencies were getting things done. We're marching forward. Look what just happened in The Middle East. You wouldn't even known the government was closed down. To close down the government, they are losing on this, the likes of which I was gonna say they've never lost before, but they've lost a lot before. So, they're just not on message. They don't know what they're doing. Zero leadership. Zero leadership. I I think they're truly embarrassing themselves. Absolutely embarrassing themselves. Speaker 0: I know we talked very early on in this administration about the difference between president Trump the first term, because you were here for the entirety of that, and the second term. How is he day to day now? Where do you see him overall? And I feel like the sky's the limit for this president and this administration. Speaker 1: The differences are absolutely incredible. We're not being attacked every day or investigated every day. The head games they played, they wanted to silence us. They ultimately wanted to put us all away for life. Then when he announced for the presidency, and we went full steam ahead. We worked in courtrooms behind the scenes. We're putting out truth social posts. We're campaigning. We're turning his press conferences in at the conclusion of a court hearing. Butler, Pennsylvania, we talked about last time, changed everything. Literally changed everything. It was from that point forward where I knew that he would be the forty seventh president of The United States. And then he just brought on a great team of people when we won the presidency. I mean, it is all surreal. I don't have time to even sit back and think about it and think about what we've been through and what we've done and what we've achieved. There will never be a president Trump ever, ever, ever again. He's changing history for the better. He's fighting every day for your children, your grandchildren, your great grandchildren, my family. That's why I do what I do. We could go out tomorrow and make millions of dollars. I I instead take a government salary to fight for the American people every day, and that's everybody in this administration. All for president Trump because they adore and they love the guy, and they love the American people. They're patriots, And that's why we're here. We're on a mission. We're on a mission to deliver for everybody out there. And we're gonna continue this mission. And we're gonna fight hard each and every day no matter what hit pieces come our way, no matter who tries to take us down, we're gonna fight, fight, fight.

I advised the president to shut down the country, despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. However, I did not recommend locking anything down.

We provided a strong country, navigated COVID well, rebuilt the military, established Space Force, and accomplished much, yet never received recognition.

I advised the president to shut down the country despite knowing it would have significant economic consequences. I did not recommend locking anything down, but rather made the difficult decision to shut the country down.

The speaker asks if Elon Musk starting a new political party worries the Trump administration. The secretary responds that the principles of Doge were very popular, but Elon Musk was not, according to polling. He believes the boards of directors at Musk's companies want him to run those companies, as he is better at that than anything else. The secretary imagines the boards of directors did not like the announcement and will encourage Musk to focus on business activities, not political activities.

Mister President, what do you think about the Democrats' criticism regarding staff reductions by Elon Musk and Doge, claiming it's an unlawful power grab? Have you instructed Musk on what he cannot do? We haven't discussed specifics much. Musk has a capable team that knows what they're doing. They ask questions and can identify issues quickly. I've directed him to explore areas like education and military, where they've uncovered significant fraud and waste. While I may target specific areas, I believe there are many opportunities for improvement. As a government, we must remain open and transparent. If necessary, I can step in personally.

I did not recommend locking everything down. I advised the president to shut the country down, which was a tough decision due to the significant economic consequences it would bring.

I sit on a task force at the Department of Defense. They have important information, and Trump believed that revealing it early would cause a civil war. He thought it was necessary for people to understand the severity of the situation.