TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We have seen, an alleged murder with such specific text messages about the alleged murder weapon, where it was hidden, how it was placed, what was on it. "A very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect's roommate and the suspect himself with him repeatedly calling his roommate who was transitioning, calling him my love, and I wanna protect you, my love." So it was this duality of someone who the attorney said not only jeopardized the life of Charlie Kirk and the crowd, but was doing it in front of children, which is one of the aggravating circumstances of this case. "And on the other hand, he was, you know, speaking so lovingly about his partner." So a very interesting and, as Pierre said, riveting press conference, David. "It was"

We just got some new footage in of the accused Charlie Kirk shooter. This is him right here at a gas station in Cedar City, Utah, and you could see he's filling up his tank. You can see the date in question there is September 11. That is the day after Charlie Kirk was shot and killed. The officers were asked to check whether a suspect in an ongoing case had disposed of evidence in a trash can at that location. Here he is getting some gas at the gas station. He fills up pretty quickly, gets back in the car and drives away. At no time did he approach or use any trash cans.

Law enforcement update on the assassination of Charlie Kirk notes new information but many questions remain. Authorities point toward a left-wing political assassination tied to Kirk’s right‑wing views, especially on transgender issues. Circumstantial evidence includes the timing—shot after the transgender issue was raised; bystanders celebrating for cameras; internet chatter suggesting prior knowledge or planning of a political hit. It’s described as potentially a professional job and premeditated, with a shot to the jugular; the possibility of master shots or a trans military ban is mentioned but deemed unlikely. The narrator says two things can be true: leftist activists could be framed by a professional hitman. Public trust in government is low; there have been conflicting statements from FBI and local law enforcement about custody. There are reports of celebratory reactions from liberals on mainstream media and campuses; the speaker calls it a dark day and promises more updates.

The speaker and his friend are discussing the chaos at a rally. They mention being told to stay by the Secret Service and witnessing a shooting. They talk about being armed and finding cover behind a tree. They mention a man in a red truck causing trouble and a potential second shooter. The speaker recalls hearing radio communications about a shooter on the roof and blood in the bathroom. They discuss surveillance footage and the speaker's upcoming visit to the FBI building. The speaker is shocked to learn that they were near the subject in the footage. They arrange a meeting time and express disbelief at the situation.

"So this Charlie Kirk story just keeps getting weirder and winter." "we're supposed to believe that some random trans shooter was on the roof" "and then you tell me that he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods." "if he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, then why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?" "He even had an American flag shirt on." "I can't wrap my head around that." "And now the FBI with all their resources, that's the best photo that they can give us?" "Didn't we watch criminal minds as a kid?" "The BAU to, like, rerender that image and get it pixel perfect and go, yep. That's him." "Face recognition software. Match on the nose, ears, Boom. There he is." "This is weird, guys. This is freaking weird."

Brand new footage allegedly shows the suspect Tyler Robinson at 11:44, 11:45AM on September 10. Now what's important about this video is this mysterious vehicle. The suspect is walking downhill with a backpack and a slight limp; he moves, then seems to stop at the intersection. He reaches a white pole, and a vehicle slows, pulls to the side, and drives off. Is that a mere coincidence, or connected to the suspect? The suspect remains behind the pole, then checks his phone and continues walking. The timing matches the famous footage of him limping across the road by the University Campus car park. This most likely is indeed the suspect concerned in the Charlie Kirk assassination. Is the vehicle connected, or a coincidence that it pulls in where he stops and then drives away? I don’t know. Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Speaker 0 describes Skyler as having given about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. She notes he is seen with glasses on top of his head, front row at the scene, and somehow sits on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial during the memorial service. She asks, “Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd?” She points out that on the day of the shooting Skyler was in the front row and near a bodyguard. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 recount Skyler’s position: “Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Close as he could.” They describe Skyler with sunglasses on his head, and a Charlie Kirk bodyguard in front of him, with Skyler off to the side in the corner when Charlie began taking questions. They note the bodyguard is directly in front of Charlie, Skyler to the side, matching Skyler’s own account of being “front row, Noel in front of him,” with a bodyguard to his left and one in front of him. They say Skyler was “front row and center.” Speaker 0 then says Skyler later appeared sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, with a floor pass for a press conference, literally “maybe 10 or so rows from the front of the stage.” They claim this is documented on Skyler’s Facebook page. They mention Skyler’s Facebook shows two, perhaps “two point, I think, k” followings, with from 2018 to 02/2025 only about seven posts and about 10 pictures, implying a sparse content profile for a “digital creator.” Speaker 3 describes Skyler’s earlier claim about getting into the stadium: “Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. … There’s been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning.” He says Skyler went past multiple security layers to obtain a media badge and a floor pass, and then ended up on the Main Floor “a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial.” The speakers question how he could gain access and yet appear to be late, then have a media pass and seating positions. Speaker 4 adds, “So, again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn’t even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It’s just like it’s a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It’s like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there.” Speaker 4 closes with a segment featuring a clip of another person describing a mythic, imagery-laden interpretation: “An indecision night. I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and rewound the tape… I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I stuck a flower inside the rifle.”

Speaker questions why a medic near Charlie when he was shot isn't seen: "there was a medic walking behind the tent, had to have been five feet from Charlie the second that he got shot? Why didn't we see a medic running around that tent to render aid to Charlie, or did we? Did I miss this? Did somebody else see a medic carrying a big bag of medical supplies and coming over and rendering aid to Charlie, or did we just see dudes jumping over a railing, grabbing some shit, doing some handoffs, and taking off?" "Pretty weird. Check this video out. Let me know what you guys think." The discussion shifts to "Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years? Too many." "Ten years? That. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great."

We are here live at Utah Valley University. There's been a shooting at the Charlie Kirk Turning Point USA event. Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck is what my kid is saying. I heard a shot... there was blood protruding from his neck or his head about six inches or more, literally gushing out. there was blood spray. The police said it could have come from up on the roof, but they arrested a guy up down right in front of Charlie. Active crime scene. Keep they're telling everybody to get out of here. There was blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over. There might be a guy on the roof. We also don't condone Hamas. We think that genocide's wrong on both sides. My sign says free Palestine, love one another. Free Palestine, there's a genocide.

The clip centers on Skyler, a man seen in multiple interviews right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. The presenters highlight that Skyler appeared in about four online interviews, and he’s pictured with sunglasses on top of his head behind Charlie’s head. They note that the day Charlie Kirk was shot, Skyler was front row to witness it, and in the interviews he never claims to be press or someone important, yet he sits on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial. They question how this is possible and point to oddities in his interviews. In one sequence, Skyler is described as being only about 10 to 15 feet away when it happened, with security to his left and nothing else in front of him—“Close as he could.” They show Skyler and Charlie’s bodyguard moving to a different area once Charlie arrives and questions begin. Skyler is described as front row and center, with the bodyguard directly in front of Charlie and Skyler off to the side with sunglasses on his head. The footage is contrasted with his Facebook activity, which the speakers examine afterward. They state that at the memorial service Skyler was “sitting on the Main Floor” with a floor pass for a press conference, seated literally “maybe 10 or so rows from the front of the stage.” They contrast this with Skyler’s Facebook page, noting that he has “two point, I think, k followings,” and that from 2018 to 02/2025 there are “maybe seven posts and like 10 pictures.” The presenters remark that there is little material on his page, suggesting a discrepancy between his apparent access and his online footprint. Further, the speakers recount Skyler’s account of entering the stadium. He says, “There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. Yeah. They’re definitely protecting this place,” and adds that there had been “an overflow,” with people waiting since 05:30 in the morning. Yet Skyler ends up with a floor pass and sits just a few rows back on the Main Floor with a badge that says media, prompting the question: “How?” They describe how another person explained the process of passing through multiple layers to obtain a media badge and access the floor. The discussion turns speculative: Skyler “was handpicked to do all these interviews,” to have “front row” seating, and to be present at key moments. The dialogue then shifts to a series of unusual videos by Skyler, described as “bizarre.” One clip contains a speaker describing an “indecision night” where they say, “I photoshopped in my mind the blood away,” “I rewound the tape,” and “the shooter… goes down the stairs,” with continued vivid, fantastical editing of the event.

At Utah Valley University, during a Charlie Kirk Turning Point USA event, witnesses reported: “There has been a shooting. Everybody's evacuating.” Someone asked, “Charlie Kirk got shot? Holy shit,” followed by, “Charlie Kirk got hit.” Security said the scene was active, with claims of a potential shooter on a roof and the area being evacuated as a crime scene. A photographer noted “the guy that got arrested.” Witness Eric said: “I was standing about the third level back… I heard a shot… there was blood protruding from his neck or his head about six inches or more, literally gushing out,” and, “I saw him slump over in his chair forward.” Further accounts described blood on the left side of the neck. In later exchanges, participants discussed politics: “free Palestine, love one another. Free Palestine, there’s a genocide.” “Don't legalize racism.” “We also don't condone Hamas.” “We’re pro Jewish people and pro Palestinian people.” “Love everyone.” A claim: “The supreme court said they could deport people based off their skin color or even like a slight suspicion based on, like, speaking Spanish or speaking with The accent.”

A person on a black Harley motorcycle with a yellow "don't tread on me" flag around their neck parked in a blocked-off parking lot with only police cars. The witness turned away briefly, and when they looked back, the person was gone. The witness noticed a side door of a building was now wide open, which had been closed a half hour prior. A police officer walked towards the door, and a state trooper ran towards it, drawing his weapon. More officers ran towards the building. The witness then heard five gunshots that did not sound like they were from a high-powered weapon.

A neighbor, Billy Toma, saw a suspicious van parked near the scene of a shooting. The van had an Arizona license plate, and about 15 cops were surrounding it. Billy and his son watched from a distance, worried about their safety. The police did not talk to them. Billy shared his experience with the news team.

"the time stamp is 12:44. Charlie Kirk was shot at 12:23." "So roughly about twenty minutes after that, he pulls in here, sits in the car park for a bit, and then drives out and then drives out of the car park and towards UVU." "This white car was parked up front closer to the camera as as we can see, and we can play this again." "the officer apparently did not have his body cam footage on." "Prosecution has a weak spot because that the messages, the the trans boyfriend messages, they don't have time stamps." "the gun that they showed initially, the picture New York Post published this. FBI never published a gun before that, right?" "This is not even the rifle." "composite stock on it." "There is enough camera footage now, somebody was telling me, and enough to for them to do, like, a ballistic sound. Acoustic forensics." "it sounds like a muffled, not like a 30 out six." "weak reload." "double DHT." "they're tainting the jury pool basically."

The speaker references a person who was removing memory cards from cameras about four minutes after what is described as the Charlie Kirk assassination, noting that something about the situation didn’t sit right. They mention Candace released a video showing how this person reacted, and that diligent investigation followed, including a campus visit to UVU to examine the events with a play-by-play analysis. The speaker says they will leave a link to that video but first shows a clip. In the clip, Speaker 1 describes the sequence: “He doesn't try to grab Charlie. He doesn't duck. His first reaction standing right here is to turn this way and start booking.” The person “starts booking back here,” and Speaker 1 notes that he sees the shot and that Charlie hasn’t even hit the ground yet. Charlie is described as being in a position where “Charlie’s like this,” and the person pivots to lean back. Security personnel respond by coming over, grabbing him, and pulling him to the ground. Meanwhile, Terrell Farnsworth “has already turned and begun running back here to climb up on that wall.” The speaker asks the audience to imagine there had just been a shooting, with chaos and people running. Charlie Kirk “was just shot,” and the wall is described as “almost as tall as I am.” The speaker asks the audience if they can see, confirming visibility. The analysis then focuses on the person’s actions: measuring “how much of a pain in the ass he climbed up right here and then threw that loose rock and just so he could get to his vantage point.” The speaker calls it out as an attempt to explain the sequence from the vantage point up the wall. The clip continues with the person producing a selfie video: “Oh, they shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie.” They refer to him as “Agent” and note his statements like “They shot Charlie. God help him.” The speaker says this behavior is a major red flag and cites it as the most troubling aspect. The running scene is described further: as the person runs out, he looks to his left and, in the footage, is seen climbing up, then reacting to the news that Charlie was shot. The voiceover emphasizes the emotional state (or lack thereof) as the footage shows the stampede of people and chaos. The speaker underscores that, to them, the absence of emotion on the person’s face during these events is “the biggest red flag of all.”

A bystander recounts a fatal shooting and describes chaotic scene and personal distress. They report that “they just killed that lady right there in that car” and urge others to check on the people connected to the car, asking if anyone knows who the car belongs to. The speaker notes the victim was in a car with her wife, who is later described as being covered in blood and distressed. The speaker repeatedly implores others to contact the victim’s family or friends, asking if any of her Facebook contacts or relatives can be reached. The speaker emphasizes the horror of witnessing the event and mentions that “this lady got blood” and that the wife was in the car. They express fear and shock, saying they don’t want to show the incident on Facebook and describing the cold weather as a factor contributing to their trembling. The scene is described as a crime scene, with the speaker insisting that those responsible “just killed her” and noting that the body was moved away toward the end of the street. Throughout, the speaker alternates between anxiety and disbelief, stating that “they just smoked this lady” and that her wife was sitting nearby with blood on her face. They reference being in a residential area and hearing shots, then coming outside to find the aftermath. A second speaker, identified as Speaker 2, urges people to move out of the way and confirms the seriousness of the situation, repeating that the woman was killed and that brain matter or blood was present on her wife’s face. The account includes: the victim’s wife present at the scene, the shooting witnessed from within a home, gunfire and immediate aftereffects, and the body reportedly transported toward the far end of the corner. Overall, the transcript centers on a live, graphic account of a woman’s killing in a car, the impact on her wife, the immediate response (movement of the body, presence of blood), and the speaker’s attempts to notify others and cope with the shock, describing the incident as a serious crime scene and noting that it occurred in a cold, tense environment.

An alleged murder was discussed with text messages about the alleged murder weapon, where it was hidden, how it was placed, what was on it. It also offered a very intimate portrait into the relationship between the suspect's roommate and the suspect himself, with him repeatedly calling his roommate who was transitioning, "my love, and I wanna protect you, my love." The attorney said the suspect not only jeopardized the life of Charlie Kirk and the crowd, but was doing it in front of children, which is one of the aggravating circumstances of this case. On the other hand, he was speaking so lovingly about his partner. So a very interesting and, as Pierre said, riveting press conference, David.

We are outside the student life alongside. What's your name? Name is Makayya. Wait. Can I see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No. You were there too? Oh, yeah. It's interesting because I was there. I I was a witness to everything that happened. I was talking to Charlie Charlie just before he took the stage, and I was I was in very, very close proximity. Can I see what happened? How are you? Did you see what happened, Phil? No. No. Charlie was a friend of mine. No. We know one thing, Charlie Kirk died. I was pretty

I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat, fell to the side, was dragged off and carried out of the venue. There was a gunshot that rang out. 'Are you okay? I'm no. I'm not okay.' Another witness asks, 'Did you guys see what happened?' Then: 'I was standing in probably the third row in the bottom. I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over, and he had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over,' and he was carried off. 'Running high right now. Everybody's in shock, including myself.'

From the outset, one of the speakers says there was a sense that the official narrative about the day didn’t add up, expressing that many Americans feel they were being lied to. The major problem they identify with the assassination narrative includes inconsistencies and unanswered questions rather than acceptance of the official story. Speaker 1 recalls being told Charlie Kirk was shot and initially in critical condition, but notes that the video shows an exit wound and movement of Kirk’s shirt that suggests an impact nearby. With extensive experience around gunshot wounds, they say what they saw didn’t make sense. They reference the FBI’s announcement of a shooter and describe a separate incident involving a person on the roof who allegedly disassembled and reassembled a firearm, aligned a scope, fired a cold bore shot, moved to the roof, and then wrapped the rifle up. They mention texts from the shooter that didn’t sound like a typical 22-year-old and state that these observations raise questions. They say asking questions leads to being torn down or accused of holding conspiracy views, and they specify they aren’t claiming “Israel did it,” but insisting the questions about the event “don’t look good.” They raise specific questions: did the security team remove Charlie Kirk’s lapel mic after the incident and give it to someone else; what happened to the SIM card; did someone take the camera behind him; why was the crime scene contaminated and rebuilt. They admit they don’t know what is true but insist the questions deserve answers. They note that once they question, they’re labeled antisemitic, and they say they didn’t even bring up Israel. They emphasize the personal and national significance of the incident. Speaker 0 mentions a claim that Charlie Kirk was portrayed as Superman, with his body supposedly stopping the 30-odd-six bullet, and asks what would have happened if a 30-06 round hit him. Speaker 1 says it would likely blow his head off and leave remnants of the bullet, arguing that they don’t think such remnants have been found yet. They question why the chair and desk were moved and contend that a forensic expert could determine the shot’s origin, insisting they are simply asking questions. If those questions can be refuted, they would stop asking; but they claim they’re not getting any answers beyond “this is what happened” and being told to “shut up.” Speaker 0 adds that telling someone to be quiet amounts to labeling them antisemitic, and that when the trial comes, they will look like a fool. Speaker 1 says that’s a tactic of the left—when you call them out, they label you a name—and that the right is now doing the same to them.

Two weeks ago, they were seen as a couple: “they were holding hands” and “they were,” and they “drove off in his car, the Dodge,” with “him dressed all in black? Yeah. Definitely.” The roommate was described as having “freckles on his face” and a “mushroom shaped” haircut. There were “published reports out there that this individual, the roommate, may have been transiting,” and the witness replied, “Did that correlate with what you saw? Yeah. Definitely.” “Okay. So he was going to have an operation to be to turn into a woman.” “Yeah. Yeah. And I think he's getting ready for that.” There was talk of a “doctor's appointment,” and they were seen “Just coming out” with the witness hearing “snippets of their conversation.” The witness said, “random guys don't hold hands and definitely don't kiss.” Nearby, it was “covered with police tape, a ton of police cars,” with “a guy sitting up on the hill with a sniper” and “SWAT trucks and definitely a few helicopters and a drone as well.” The observer asked, “Is there did a killing happen here?” and later learned “the guy that shot Kirk was lived right close to me,” adding, “For Charlie Kirk, I knew him over the years. Like, I didn't know him personally, but I've watched his videos before.”

I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He collapsed in his seat. He fell over to the side. There was a gunshot that rang out. He was dragged off and carried out of the venue. He had blood on his arms. He had blood on his shirt. I saw somebody get shot today. I was standing in probably the third row in the bottom. I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. It's high right now. Everybody's in shock, including myself. Where's your mama?

"We have seen, an alleged murder with such specific text messages about the alleged murder weapon, where it was hidden, how it was placed, what was on it." "But, also, it was very touching in a way that I think many of us didn't expect." "A very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect's roommate and the suspect himself with him repeatedly calling his roommate who was transitioning, calling him my love, and I wanna protect you, my love." "So it was this duality of someone who the attorney said not only jeopardized the life of Charlie Kirk and the crowd, but was doing it in front of children, which is one of the aggravating circumstances of this case." "And on the other hand, he was, you know, speaking so lovingly about his partner." "So a very interesting and, as Pierre said, riveting press conference, David."