TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Henry Kissinger, world famous as US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under Nixon and Ford. NSSM 200, the Kissinger Report, was a top secret 1973 memorandum about the planet’s resources. Kissinger proposed a plan to consolidate the smooth flow of valuable resources from various countries to the US. He stated that taking other countries’ resources was easy when countries were stable, but unstable countries were difficult to access. The question, he posed, was how to stabilize less developed countries. He argued that the world’s most valuable resources such as oil, natural gas, gold and minerals were in less developed countries. In his report he wrote: Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interest of The United States. This was presented as a rationale for population policy, including abortion and birth-control measures, to create stability and access to resources. Kissinger advised that in order to create stability one needs population policy, including legalizing abortion, giving families money if they use contraception, and if necessary, accepting sterilization and abortion. If that wasn’t sufficient, population policy could entail forced birth control, forced sterilization and forced abortions. Furthermore, he advised withholding aid, disaster aid and food aid if a less developed country refused to implement US population control programs. The content claimed that this was a method to pillage a country’s resources, create stability by reducing the population, and remove anti-imperialist youth. The result, it is claimed, was a massacre worldwide documented in research papers ignored by mainstream media and the UN. Two examples cited are China and Peru. China: It is claimed that China’s one-child policy started in 1979 and changed in 2015 to a two-child policy if the first child is a girl. With the financial help of the United Nations Population Fund, UNFPA, China developed state-of-the-art tracking systems to monitor women’s monthly cycles. It is claimed that if a fetus was not allowed by the government, the woman would be arrested and forced to have an abortion. The speaker states that the UN supported, funded, and facilitated China’s population control program, including a $100,000,000 donation to UNFPA and a $12,000,000 computer complex to monitor the program, along with technical expertise and personnel. It is claimed that abortions were used as a weapon of mass destruction and that hundreds of millions of lives were exterminated. The UNFPA allegedly defended China’s actions and was awarded by the UN for China’s population control program. The policy is described as preventing hundreds of millions of births and conducting hundreds of millions of abortions under the one-child policy, with reports of high female suicide rates and a skewed sex ratio. Peru: Between 1995 and 1997, over a quarter of a million Peruvian women were sterilized as part of President Fujimori’s family planning goals financed by the US, described as the Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign, with reports of coerced sterilizations and threats to withhold food for refusing sterilization. It is claimed that many women were traumatized, with poor hygiene in hospitals causing deaths or severe harm. The transcript argues that in every less developed country, UN concern was not development, health or women’s empowerment, but reversing unchecked population growth. Kissinger is described as laying out protocols for modern times, and various allegations are presented about his background and alleged roots, including claims about his family name and ethnicity. NGOs: The transcript discusses NGOs connected to the UN, noting that NGOs are tax-exempt and 501c organizations, with examples including the Population Council, funded by John D. Rockefeller III and associated with eugenics and depopulation aims. It claims the Population Council supported et al. projects such as intrauterine devices in several countries, and published material advocating measures like adding fertility-control agents to water and compulsory sterilization. It argues that there are 37 NGOs worldwide advocating negative population growth under the banner of sustainability and overpopulation concerns. Planned Parenthood: The transcript asserts that Planned Parenthood, founded by Margaret Sanger, has internationally scaled activities with abortions, and claims about tissue procurement and compensation. It cites statements about compensation for tissue specimens and mentions editing to discuss tissue donation, with a claim that Planned Parenthood profits or receives funding from major foundations and governments. It states that the Trump administration ended US funding for Planned Parenthood in 2019. Ending note: The transcript mentions Kissinger’s removal from the Pentagon Defense Policy Board and promises to continue discussing the UN, its NGOs, and alleged threefold purposes: pillaging resources, money laundering, and population control, with the aim to expose the alleged depopulation program.

Ahmad Babagir, the 4th prime minister of Malaysia and president of the Perdana Global Peace Foundation, spoke about the intention to reduce the world's population. Initially, the goal was to decrease it from 3 billion to 1 billion people. However, the current population stands at 7 billion. To achieve the desired reduction, billions of people may need to be killed, starved, or prevented from giving birth. This unfortunate fate awaits many, resulting in the peace of the grave.

"One of the hopeful things that I have discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past fifty years has been a result of media lives." "The media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough." "If they hadn't reprinted government propaganda they could have stopped it." "Populations don't like wars and populations have to be fooled into wars." "Populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war." "But our number one enemy is ignorance and I believe that is the number one enemy that everyone is not understanding what is actually going on in the world." "Now, the question is who is promoting ignorance?" "In this latter category, it is bad media." "The result is we see wars and we see corrupt governance continue."

I have faced criticism, but it's part of life. I read it, take note, and improve. Singapore's success speaks for itself. The opposition has chances to voice their views. Critics mention human rights and executions, but drug trafficking devastates families. I execute foreign traffickers to protect society. Amnesty's claims lack understanding. Despite the death penalty, the rewards for trafficking are too high. I am not ruthless, and I believe in open dialogue. At 74, I reflect on my past achievements and look forward to pleasant conversations.

Ahmad Brabagir, the 4th prime minister of Malaysia and president of the Predana Global Peace Foundation, spoke about the intention to reduce the world's population. Originally, the goal was to decrease it from 3 billion to 1 billion people. However, the current population stands at 7 billion. To achieve this reduction, there may be measures such as killing or starving billions of people or preventing them from giving birth. Unfortunately, those who suffer and die will find peace in the grave.

The UN reports the world population has surpassed 8,000,000,000, but these figures are questionable. Independent investigations reveal discrepancies when calculating populations using the UN's own data. For example, adding the populations of India's 300 largest cities accounts for only 200,000,000 people, making a total national figure of 1,400,000,000 statistically impossible. Similarly, the world's 300 most populated cities only total approximately 1,500,000,000 people. Governments may inflate population statistics to secure more funding for social programs and manipulate the public through fear, leading to expensive and controlling solutions. Concerns about overpopulation have led to inhumane population control programs, such as China's one-child policy and forced sterilizations. The UN Population Fund is involved in population moderation programs worldwide. The greatest threat to mankind's prosperity is government, not population growth.

Speaker 0 describes birth control as something created by Margaret Sanger and connects her to the “tiny hats.” He claims Sanger was attempting population control and that her project aimed to “get rid of one group of people and then get rid of everybody else,” calling the birth control movement “poison.” He asserts that birth control involves taking synthetic estrogen and a synthetic steroid, “poisoning your body,” and reiterates that Sanger was a demonic figure who “can expect to” receive retribution from the tiny hats. He asserts that the tiny hats funded Planned Parenthood and the birth control movement, with funding from the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and labels the entire matter a “deep rabbit hole.” He argues that birth control and clinics were part of a broader scheme leading to depopulation, and ties the issues to Marxism, feminism, and the involvement of the Rothschilds, describing a conspiratorial network behind these movements. Speaker 1 counters that birth control could help keep the population more or less static until resources can be increased, suggesting that preventing starvation depends on either birth control or resource acquisition, and framing the question as choosing between the two: “birth control or picking up the resources.” He concedes there is a limit to increasing resources, implying that there is a trade-off between controlling population growth and expanding resources, but he does not take a firm stance beyond recognizing a resource limitation. Overall, the transcript presents two perspectives: Speaker 0 advances a conspiratorial critique linking birth control to Sanger, “tiny hats,” and powerful financiers, portraying it as poison and part of a depopulation agenda connected to Marxism and feminism. Speaker 1 raises a pragmatic ambiguity, suggesting that birth control could stabilize population while resources are improved, but notes that resource limitations impose a constraint.

We use unlimited force and control the global media to hide the truth from the public. People believe everything is done for good reasons, but it's not.

Back then, you couldn't say anything about masks or vaccines without facing censorship. It was considered a public health threat. Now, two years later, we're seeing news admitting that there were mistakes due to censorship. No one was interested in the truth or studying the situation. People were more focused on imposing restrictions and control. We need freedom to debate. It's concerning that a public organization can gather and accuse someone of lying on the internet without any consequences. Is this the solution? Is this the way forward?

Speaker 0 notes the world population is 6.8 billion and is headed up to about 9 billion. He says if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 1 responds with the question: common sense would tell you that if a man standing in front of you says he's gonna reduce the world's population by 10–15% using vaccines, what does that mean to you? He explains that means somebody's going to die because you put a vaccine in them, and it doesn't mean you're going to save people. He says that’s common sense, but he saw him say it, and now he’s here; he says, "I’m now an anti vaxxer I wasn't before."

We must address anti-vax campaigns to save lives. I am willing to collaborate with the government on emergency legislation to combat misinformation. The discussion of censorship on morning television in the UK is concerning, as it threatens freedom of speech and individual rights to be skeptical about certain products.

There were people, including Zionists, who opposed any action unless they were given all of Palestine without effort. However, it was not feasible to relocate millions of people and expect both groups to be satisfied. Recognizing Israel was a difficult decision that required compromise. The Jews wanted to remove all Arabs to the Tigris and Euphrates River, while the Arabs wanted to expel all Jews to the Red Sea. My goal was to find a homeland for the Jews while being fair to all parties involved.

You discussed immigration and the concept of a "great replacement." I challenged the claim that I said whites are being replaced, stating I focus on native-born Americans, including Black Americans, whose concerns are valid. My position is that the leaders should prioritize citizens, and the U.S. population is growing through immigration due to low birth rates. I believe improving the economy and culture is essential for encouraging families to have children. I reject any implication that my views inspire violence or hate crimes, emphasizing my opposition to mass shootings and my right to self-defense. I expressed disappointment in the media's approach to these discussions, hoping for more thoughtful engagement.

India is criticized for its barbaric practices, but the speaker is surprised to find an American organization operating in a similar manner. The Indian Parliament formed a committee to investigate, which resulted in a scathing report. However, the government officials apologized and allowed the organization to continue their activities. On a positive note, India is developing its own COVID-19 vaccine, with human trials starting in July 2020. The speaker believes that the media and political leaders manipulate public opinion to acquire power and financial gain. They express concern that pharmaceutical companies will exploit India's large population and harm many people. The speaker also laments the lack of justice for girls who have suffered.

The speaker describes India as a laboratory to test ideas before taking them to other places. They state that they do more in India than any other country. An individual alleges that several Indian tribal girls were used as guinea pigs and that an untested vaccine was administered to thousands of tribal girls without proper study and paperwork. The Gates Foundation denied that it had been a clinical trial. The speaker mentions a commitment over the next decade to vaccines, and uses India as an example of a chaotic place with open defecation, stating that things won't be normal until there is an amazing vaccine for the entire world.

The speaker highlights India (almost 1,500,000,000 people) and China as powerful economies with their own domestic political mechanisms and laws. When someone says they will punish you, you must consider how the leadership of these large countries, "which had difficult periods in their history too, that had to do with colonialism, with attacks on their sovereignty during prolonged periods of time," would respond. If one of them shows weakness, "his political career will be over," which shapes their behavior. "Just the colonial era is now over." They must realize they "cannot use this tone in speaking with their partners." But ultimately, "things will be sorted out. Everything will take its place, and we will see a normal political dialogue again."

In the exchange, the interviewer challenges the government’s line on its fiscal and welfare choices. The interviewer cites a statement attributed to the leader of the opposition, quoting: “For months, Reeves has lied to the public to justify record tax hikes to pay for more welfare. Did you lie?” The question is direct: did Reeves lie? Reeves responds by framing his role and goal. He says, “Look. I'm a labor chancellor. I want to reduce child poverty. I make no apologies for that.” He asserts this will be “the biggest ever reduction in child poverty in a parliament ever,” and he expresses pride in being the chancellor who “lifts half a million kids out of poverty.” He explains the practical implications of this aim as, “That means kids not going to bed hungry. It means kids not waking up in cold and damp homes.” He stresses that he is proud and happy to defend the choices he has made. The interviewer presses again, asking, “Did you lie?” Reeves repeats, “Of course, I didn’t.” The line of questioning returns to the reader’s interpretation that the welfare measures and tax policy were funded by misleading the public, but Reeves stands firm on his denial. The interviewer then asks a clarifying question about the prime minister’s involvement, wondering whether the prime minister was informed throughout the process. Reeves confirms, “Yes. And he was right there with you on it all? Yes. Of course.” This confirms that the prime minister was aware and aligned with the approach and decisions under discussion. The exchange centers on a clash between allegations of deceit regarding tax hikes and welfare funding, and Reeves’s declarative defense of his policy objectives—primarily reducing child poverty and preventing poverty-related harm to children—along with a reiteration that he did not lie and that the prime minister was informed and supportive of the course of action.

We're injecting genetically modified organisms into kids' arms. My business strategies were questioned during the Microsoft antitrust trial. To counter the negative press, I invested in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, transforming my image. Vaccines are the best investment I've ever made, with over a 20 to 1 return. The Gates Foundation controls a vast supply chain, but it faces criticism for profiting from companies causing the very problems it aims to solve. Normalcy returns only with global vaccination. Until then, new vaccines and therapeutics are needed. Vaccine manufacturers have immunity. In India, the Gates Foundation incentivized mass vaccinations. An untested vaccine was given to tribal girls without proper consent, causing injuries and even deaths. The Indian Parliament investigated and initially kicked out the Gates Foundation. Studies show the oral polio vaccine caused paralysis in nearly 500,000 Indian children.

There are potential side effects in vaccinations, and some people have gotten very sick from them. However, I am not forcing anyone to get vaccinated. Instead, I am providing incentives and protections to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated.

There were people, including some Jews, who opposed any action that didn't give them all of Palestine. However, it was not feasible to relocate millions of people and expect everyone to be satisfied. Despite objections, we took gradual steps and things are progressing. Recognizing Israel as a state was not an easy decision, as it required compromising with the Arabs and dividing Palestine. The Jews wanted the Arabs gone, and the Arabs wanted the Jews gone. I aimed to find a homeland for the Jews while being fair to the Arabs. However, in such situations, the people you help the most often become the most angry with you.

I don't care if the rest of the world likes us, but I do care if they respect us. Right now, Britain is a joke. As an example, the Labour government set aside only £10,000,000 for local inquiries into the rape gangs. This year, we sent £133,000,000 to Pakistan in foreign aid. I want to scrap every penny of it, or at the very least, use it as leverage to force the Pakistani government to accept their deported rapists and criminals. The British government needs to prioritize the British people.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

The world population has allegedly reached 8 billion, but skepticism arises due to discrepancies in official statistics. India and the world's 300 largest cities show population figures that don't add up to the reported numbers. Exaggerated population data is used by governments to secure more funding and control. The overpopulation myth has led to harmful policies like China's one-child policy and forced sterilization in various countries. The real issue lies in government control, not population growth.

Scientists, medical experts, and researchers worldwide recognized that vaccination was crucial in overcoming the pandemic. While not mandatory, I ensured that incentives and protections were in place to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated. As a result, our vaccination rates surpassed those of our peer countries, leading to a less severe pandemic. However, there are dissenting voices in the comment section of this livestream. It is important to find ways to protect and address their concerns while fulfilling my duty as prime minister to preserve lives, safety, and democracy.

I was accused of being part of a propaganda effort to censor those questioning the origin of the virus. I stand by my assertion that the virus is not a lab construct, which aligns with the intelligence community's conclusion. I cannot control how my work is used. It is wrong to censor and lie to the public, and I should have done better.