reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers discuss the possibility of bioweapons being used and masked as natural occurrences. They claim the U.S. government, through figures like Fauci and the CIA, may have orchestrated the COVID-19 pandemic and its origins being attributed to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which allegedly received $15 million from the U.S. to develop SARS. They connect this to Operation Mongoose and past U.S. military programs that allegedly created Lyme disease by weaponizing tick-borne viruses to harm Cuban agriculture. They claim this was intended to cause starvation and incite regime change. They allege the Rocky Mountain Laboratories and figures like Bergdorfer were involved in this research under the guise of vaccine development. The speakers suggest a pattern of the U.S. military funding the creation of viruses and then funding the cover-up, using CIA proprietaries and military-funded censorship organizations to control the narrative. They call for further investigation into institutions like USAID and public health universities.

In this video, the speaker discusses a simulation event that took place in October 2019, hosted by Bill Gates, Thao Chi, and April Hayes. The last simulation focused on pandemic planning and the suppression of freedom of speech. The speaker mentions that COVID-19 was likely circulating by mid-September, but the Chinese government restricted information about it. They also mention that Bill Gates bought and sold shares of BioNTech vaccine, which later became the Pfizer vaccine. The speaker suggests a connection between Gates' actions and the announcement that the vaccine didn't work. They also mention that Gates provided funding to the speaker's institution.

According to a report sent to Washington, SARS CoV-two was created in a Wuhan lab with unsafe conditions, funded by Fauci. The US intelligence community was actively involved and aware, using groups like In-Q-Tel. This was allegedly done despite the Chinese Communist Party's desire for bioweapon technology. The speaker calls for investigations into public and private partners connected to EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan, including Meta Bioda and Rosemont Seneca, questioning if the president was involved in a cover-up to protect his son. Fauci allegedly coordinated a cover-up with Peter Dasek on the lab leak theory. Ralph Barack and UC Davis were also allegedly involved. The speaker accuses Fauci of lying about gain-of-function research and suggests he should be in jail. Fauci and others are allegedly profiting from the pandemic. The speaker advocates for focusing on those responsible for the pandemic instead of internal conflicts. Others discuss the potential for future outbreaks and the need for better preparedness and funding for research and vaccine development, including mRNA technology.

The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, which they believe may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence linking this research to the pandemic. The speaker claims Anthony Fauci denied this research under oath and may have sought a preemptive pardon. They argue that gain of function research continues in biolabs worldwide, posing a risk of future pandemics. The speaker faced criticism for warning about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine. The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, contrasting this with instances where they quickly make assumptions without conclusive evidence. They attribute this to the politicization of intelligence, citing the Iraq War as an example of intelligence being used to influence policy.

In October 2019, an event called event 201 took place in New York, simulating a pandemic. The speaker questions why the CIA was involved, suggesting they want to use the pandemic as an excuse to limit free speech and control the population. They mention that the CIA discussed restricting criticism of government policies and the lab leak theory before the Wuhan outbreak. Another speaker suggests flooding communication channels with trusted sources instead of controlling communication. The speaker expresses concern about the CIA using future pandemics to undermine American democracy and the bill of rights.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was misused for control and profit by the pharmaceutical industry and to introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker claims that vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, with Pfizer and Moderna acting as fronts. They also mention multiple simulations of coronavirus outbreaks sponsored by the CIA, including one in October 2019. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the involvement of the CIA and Chinese CDC. They suggest a historical connection between the CIA and bioweapons research, and how the Patriot Act revived the bioweapons arms race.

The Chinese State Council Information Office claims COVID originated in the U.S. A special team is investigating COVID's origins, with findings on covid.gov. Work is being done with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy, looking at U.S. funded gain of function research at the Wuhan lab and other biolabs, which has led to health crises. The goal is to find the specific link between gain of function research and COVID-19. If Peter Daszak's research with the Wuhan lab caused the pandemic, then the U.S. funded it, and Anthony Fauci denied it under oath. Gain of function research is ongoing in biolabs worldwide, like in Ukraine. Warning against U.S. funded biolabs in Ukraine led to accusations of being a Russian asset. The intelligence community was reluctant to say COVID came from a lab, possibly due to the politicization of intelligence. This politicization dates back to intelligence used to justify the Iraq regime change war.

The speaker suggests that American tax dollars funded gain-of-function research that created the virus. They claim that Dr. Fauci and various government agencies, including the NIH, State Department, USAID, and DOD, were involved. They argue that Fauci funded a study that taught Chinese military scientists how to build weapons of mass destruction and hide human tampering on the virus. They question why the U.S. government would fund such research and why they were teaching Chinese scientists. They also mention the CIA's involvement and their role in the cover-up. The speaker raises concerns about the lack of medical benefit and the potential bioweapons implications.

Speaker 0 notes: “Have them write the information.” Speaker 1 points out that two people were sitting together: George Gao, director general of the Chinese CDC, and the deputy director of the CIA, who later became head of the entire intelligence community, at an event during the Wuhan military games two months before the Wuhan outbreak. They remark on how conveniently they were seated near each other given how closely they would coordinate two months later. In this segment, social media is mentioned 19 times. Speaker 2 comments that social media is now the primary channel for news, that interruptions to platforms could curb misinformation but also limit access to legitimate sources, and that health ministries worldwide are trying to combat misinformation and disinformation. Speaker 1 describes the tabletop exercise: the deputy director of the CIA becomes head of the ODNI as soon as Biden takes office and is dealing with social media issues. The speaker notes that George Gao attended the exercise, asking why the simulation—which was about an animal-borne coronavirus outbreak in Latin America—had the China CDC head at the table and the U.S. ODNI head present, while the outbreak was said to start in Brazil, and there were no Latin American health officials present. The president of the UPS foundation is mentioned as the only Latin-named figure. The speaker questions why the Brazil CDC director isn’t in the exercise if it’s simulating a Latin American outbreak and points to the arrangement as contradictory to the premise. Speaker 3 repeats that experts agree new disinformation campaigns are generated daily, describing the problem as huge and potentially undermining pandemic response and governance. Speaker 1 emphasizes disinformation keeping us from ending the pandemic, noting the Wuhan games are ongoing in Wuhan, and describing rumors that the US military engineered the virus and that USAID funded work, with a web of claims about public health, vaccines, and pharmaceutical company misdeeds. The speaker asserts that Pfizer, Moderna, and Gates Foundation funding are involved, including claims that Moderna patented the coronavirus vaccine before the outbreak and that Moderna is a Pentagon arm with no prior successful vaccine. Speaker 2 warns that unrest from false rumors and divisive messaging is rising and undermining response efforts as trust declines. Speaker 1 mentions the “China CDC, in charge of the Wuhan lab,” and notes that healthcare workers, if poorly trained, might give wrong information or say “I don’t know,” which erodes public trust. Speaker 0 recalls a Sierra Leone radio interview about whether Ebola was man-made, highlighting the importance of the TOT (tabletop exercise) and ensuring that nobody suspects a man-made origin. Speaker 4: Proposes steps to prevent spreading misinformation on social media by collaborating with telecommunications companies to control information access and ensuring a trusted source floods the zone with messaging, including trained influential community leaders and health workers to disseminate the desired messaging. Speaker 1 questions the idea of flooding the zone with messaging and notes the need for a rapid response to disinformation, while acknowledging that there are intelligence sources identifying foreign disinformation campaigns as part of a larger effort to address the pandemic.

In a pandemic simulation called Event 201, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control communication. They aim to prevent criticism of government policies and discussions about a lab leak. The CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001, practicing how to execute a coup d'etat against American democracy and the bill of rights. This raises concerns about their intentions and actions.

"In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation had published a report about technology in the future, and one of the scenarios was a flu pandemic. And what we followed in 2020 was exactly what was written out for that script." "fall twenty nineteen, the Johns Hopkins, the Gates Foundation, and the World Economic Forum put together a three and a half hour event online called event two zero one." "Critical really critical a so called tabletop exercise." "Nothing about health. Nothing about vitamin d, good nutrition, repurposed available drugs." "It was all about suppressing dissent. It was all about militarization of society." "It was led by Averell Haynes who had been with the CIA." "In my view, clearly, explicitly, Operation Warp Speed was a military operation." "Department of Defense was over health and human services and over the pharmaceutical industry."

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker claims that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer. They also mention multiple simulations of coronavirus outbreaks sponsored by the CIA over the years. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the involvement of the Chinese CDC and CIA in suppressing the lab leak theory. They connect the history of bioweapons research to the CIA and Pentagon's interest in gain-of-function research.

In a pandemic simulation called event two zero one, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control communication. They aim to prevent criticism of government policies and discussions about a lab leak. The CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001, practicing how to use a future pandemic to undermine democracy and individual rights. This raises concerns about their intentions and actions.

Event 201 was a simulation exercise that occurred right before the COVID-19 lockdowns. It was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the same group that accurately predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks with a similar simulation beforehand. Event 201 involved actors who greatly benefited from COVID-19 policies. Avril Haines, a long-time consultant for Palantir and former CIA Deputy Director under Obama, was directly involved in the simulation. Haines, who is now the Director of National Intelligence, essentially the CIA's boss in the Biden administration, attempted to remove her connection to Palantir from her online biographies when she joined the Biden campaign.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

COVID-19 had telltale signs of being made in a laboratory from the beginning. The CIA has stated the virus came from a lab, but what they didn't say is that it was almost surely made in a US laboratory, possibly at the University of North Carolina, and may have been tested in a Chinese laboratory. The Biden administration hid this. One theory is that US scientists wanted to test the virus on a specific bat population in the Wuhan facility. The FBI should crack the case, as it is an inside US job. The University of North Carolina is withholding 2019 emails and fighting to keep them from public scrutiny. There is reason to believe that Tony Fauci funded reckless, dangerous research that went awry.

- Gain of function research is a disaster that has given us diseases, and there is evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research. HIV may also have come from a vaccine program. - Event 201 was a simulation right before COVID hit that focused on turning America into a totalitarian state and imposing censorship. There have been 22 of these simulations, sponsored by the CIA, with Fauci and Bill Gates playing key roles. Gates proposed a partnership with Fauci to vaccinate the world. These simulations involved hundreds of thousands of people, including police officers and healthcare workers, and were a way of practicing a coup d'etat against American democracy. - Tulsi Gabbard is working with someone who says the creation of weaponized SARS COVID goes back to Fauci and was an Obama project. The director of national intelligence is investigating Fauci for his role in creating COVID-19. - The Trump administration, through Kennedy and Gabbard, is preparing to bring forward irrefutable evidence that COVID-19 was made in the USA and shipped to China for plausible deniability as a political coup d'etat against the West. Trump is moving to reveal that COVID was made by Democrat globalists as a weapon against the West. - Methylene blue increases electrochemical activity and gives a tingling sensation.

The speaker suggests that Cyrus had all the elements of the grant, including Barrick, Daszek, and possibly Dr. Fauci. They believe that DARPA officials should have acknowledged in January 2020 that the virus resembled one they were working on at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, indicating a possible lab origin.

The last major pandemic simulation occurred in October 2019, hosted by Bill Gates and others, focusing on pandemic management and freedom of speech. At that time, COVID-19 was not widely known, but it was likely circulating by mid-September. The Chinese government took down data from a lab linked to the virus around that time, indicating awareness of its spread. Shortly after the simulation, Gates sold 87% of his shares in BioNTech, which developed the Pfizer vaccine, making a significant profit. A week later, it was announced that the vaccine was ineffective. This sequence of events raises questions about the motivations and timing of actions taken by key figures during the pandemic.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is believed by some, including the speakers, to be a bioweapons lab with Chinese Communist Party officials. The speakers suggest that the US government may have been collecting intelligence on the lab through a scientist named Peter Daszak, who had a relationship with the CIA. They propose that the US government traded advanced biotech for access to the lab. The second speaker agrees with this theory and mentions that he received leaked documents related to the lab. The Department of Defense is also mentioned.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

- Gain of function research is a disaster that has given us diseases like Lyme disease, COVID, and RSV. There is evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research. Medical and vaccine research has created some of the worst plagues in history, and HIV may have come from a vaccine program. - Event 201 was a simulation before COVID that focused on turning America into a totalitarian state and imposing censorship. There have been 22 of these CIA-sponsored simulations, with Fauci and Bill Gates playing key roles. Gates proposed a partnership with Fauci to vaccinate the world. These drills involved hundreds of thousands of people and practiced a coup d'etat against American democracy. - Tulsi Gabbard is working with someone who says the creation of weaponized SARS COVID goes back to Fauci and was an Obama project. The Director of National Intelligence is investigating Fauci's role in creating COVID-19. Evidence suggests COVID was made in the USA and shipped to Wuhan for plausible deniability as a political coup against the West. Trump is moving to reveal that COVID was made by Democrat globalists as a weapon against the West. - Methylene blue increases electrochemical activity and creates an out-of-body experience.

The speaker ties a series of events to a ritual pattern, referencing theProject for the New American Century and arguing that support for its plans overseas would require a new Pearl Harbor, a claim linked to warnings a year before 9/11. They cite the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates’ Event 2010 simulating a pandemic out of China “just six weeks before the footage started appearing of bodies dropping in Wuhan.” They assert that such patterns are intentional signals, and that massive cyber attack drills and Klaus Schwab’s expressed fears of a coming cyber pandemic were steps toward that direction. They note that in December Israel hosted a cyber pandemic drill, and “on Monday just twelve weeks later their government was attacked in what they say was the largest ever cyber attack on the country.” Given Israel’s “infamous hacking capabilities,” the speaker suggests it feels like a controlled vulnerability, a way to create a plausible escape while the detective won’t suspect involvement in the metaphorical murder. The speaker argues that chess pieces are being moved in both Russia and Ukraine to bring about a scenario where “the world we once knew is gone,” destroyed, and a “new world, a world of their design, will emerge.” They claim a future in which “you’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy, happy in your complete submission.” They invoke a historical allegory, “Like Xerxes to Leonidas,” to describe the perceived power struggle behind these actions.

The transcript discusses a narrative that connects Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and a global, pre-planned approach to pandemics, presenting a sequence of alleged events and structures designed to profit from health crises. It begins with a claim that new vaccines and health services could be improved and costs reduced by ten to fifteen percent over the next five to ten years, and that a future pandemic will occur regardless of current efforts. It is stated that the pandemic risk is two to three percent per year and that attention to preparedness will continue, noting that the pandemic was predictable and could be far more severe in the future. One speaker asserts they had predicted the risk of a pandemic and that it came true. The brand-new Epstein files are then introduced, claiming they show Epstein planned the whole thing from the start and expose a financial system designed around pandemics that operated long before COVID-19. The documents allegedly reveal a hidden network directly connecting Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and other powerful individuals. Epstein is said to have helped design the financial apparatus that later secured over 100 million dollars in funding for the Gates Foundation, advising JPMorgan executives on pitching a Gates Anchored Donor Fund to attract vaccine investments under the guise of philanthropy but designed to generate profits. It is claimed Gates had already invested in vaccines from the early 2000s but faced controversy over mass vaccine distribution and promises of disease eradication, which allegedly sometimes worsened problems. Gates is also quoted as saying vaccines could reduce the global population by a significant amount. There is a point-by-point timeline: the world’s population is described as 6.8 billion, headed toward about 9 billion, with a suggestion that great work on vaccines and reproductive health could lower that by ten to fifteen percent. In 2013, the Gates Foundation allegedly created the Global Health Investment Fund, allowing private investors to fund drug and vaccine development with a stated health purpose, while offering a 60% guarantee of principal, meaning investors would risk only 40% while the remaining 60% of potential losses would be covered by philanthropic and public money. This structure is said to convert global health issues into profitable opportunities with low risk, securing funds and enabling subsequent actions. Epstein’s role is described as expanding Gates’ influence in pandemic preparedness. The 2011 funding groundwork allegedly paved the way for broader governance, with Gates Foundation discussions in 2015 about pandemics and global responses, involving groups like the International Peace Institute, World Health Organization, World Bank, MSF, and UN officials. It is claimed Epstein acted as a back-channel intermediary to spread Gates’ influence, maintaining contacts even after funding refusals, by forwarding Gates’ articles on pandemic preparedness. The timeline continues with 2017 being a turning point, where pandemics were discussed as business opportunities rather than disasters, and Epstein was said to broker specialists into Gates’ office for pandemic simulations. A doctor’s text is cited indicating pandemic simulation as a key credential, with Epstein recommending a connection to Gates. That year also saw the World Bank launch the first emergency financing facility, raising $320 million in bonds named to cover coronavirus risks, implying planning for a coronavirus-style outbreak years in advance. In October 2019, six weeks before COVID-19, Event 201—a pandemic simulation modeled on a novel coronavirus—was co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Gates Foundation, focusing on government policy during a viral outbreak, distribution of drugs, media messaging, social media management, public compliance, and unified global response. Six weeks later, the real outbreak began. While the documents are not proof, and other evidence such as patents and gain-of-function funding are cited, the narrative suggests a pattern of pre-planned preparation, money, simulations, networks, vaccines, and elite alignment. The closing question asks readers to consider who benefits when such world-stage events occur, proposing that identifying beneficiaries clarifies the situation.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker also mentions that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer as claimed. They discuss the numerous pandemic simulations sponsored by the CIA over the years and the involvement of April Haines, the former deputy director of the CIA. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the role of the CIA and Chinese CDC in suppressing the lab leak theory. They also provide a historical context of the US bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA and Pentagon.