reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Only 20 members of Congress were willing to stand up because frontline members, even those in districts that Joe Biden won, felt loyalty to Kevin McCarthy. They argued that if someone takes money from lobbyists for years and then turns against them, no one will support them again. They rely on this system to resource their campaigns. Some members fear disrupting the system and prefer calm waters. They oppose anything that creates turbulence. This mindset is prevalent in both the Republican and Democrat conferences, leading to groupthink in the unit party.

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden are accused of corruption and law-breaking. They have allegedly learned that being a liberal Democrat means avoiding prosecution. They have also observed Donald Trump's ability to challenge the system. Now, a corrupt machine is making a desperate attempt to destroy their most dangerous opponent, disregarding the Constitution and the rule of law. This will likely lead to a long-lasting bitterness. Those who seek to control America will break any law, lie about any topic, and manipulate the system, including the elite news media.

Former federal officials are cashing in as foreign lobbyists, influencing policies that send jobs and industries overseas. Young individuals with no skills are making hundreds of thousands by leveraging their connections in Washington. Even worse, foreign lobbyists are working on presidential campaigns, akin to having spies during the Cold War. The list includes high-ranking officials and even a trade commission member who switched sides mid-negotiation. This must be stopped on day 1.

The wealthy business interests control everything, not politicians. They own land, corporations, and media. They lobby for self-interest, not critical thinking citizens. They want obedient workers, not informed individuals. The system benefits them, not the people. It's a rigged game, but many are unaware or indifferent.

Speaker 2 notes that some members of Congress may be personally compromised and don’t want the truth to get out. Speaker 3 says: “You got powerful people, and they write the big checks” who “love their money” and protect it. He describes a honeypot tactic, noting Russians used it; overseas trips can lead to scandal, with a well-dressed man whispering, “There’s tapes out on you” before a key vote. He recalls a trip with Andy Biggs and being pressured after sleeping with someone abroad. He cites a Chinese prostitution ring busted in Washington, DC with a client list of “High ranking officials, in government, elected officials, and lobbyists,” whose story disappeared. He says these people are “employed by forces that want to control Congress” via spouses or employment agencies, “they employ them.” He concludes, “America's not buying that… 12% of the population votes, this is what you get.”

If you don't conform to the prevailing national security state or neoconservative worldview, there's a whole infrastructure that supports those who do. They have endowed professorships, think tanks offering high-paying jobs, and a clear career path in government. However, if you think differently, you're targeted and canceled. They go to great lengths to undermine you, and if that fails, they attempt to ruin you.

There needs to be Democrats who walk the walk and talk the talk because hypocrisy gets exploited to fuel cynicism. Insider trading in Congress is a prime example. Members of Congress sit on a committee, get information about a drug or a contract, and immediately make a call to their stockbroker, changing things so their portfolio swells. This is done on public trust, taxpayer finance, and public facilities while regulating the market they're trading on. The speaker questions why people act like money only corrupts Republicans.

Mike Pompeo is criticized for keeping information secret and being involved in questionable activities. Members of Congress fear intelligence agencies and are not holding them accountable. This lack of oversight undermines democracy. Some speculate that committee chairmen may be compromised due to personal secrets, leading to inaction on important issues. Powerful individuals acknowledge this reality but question why it is allowed to persist.

Media control is obvious, and when someone appears less controlled, people are drawn to them. There is now a new generation consuming information that is not controlled, although it may not always be correct. The CIA has a significant amount of control over public conversation and politics, but if you were to say this out loud, people would think you're crazy. The CIA is completely out of control and corrupt, with unknown budgets, staff, reach, and mission. There are even instances of CIA officers buying expensive real estate, raising questions about where they get the money. This financial corruption is mind-blowing and unknown to the average person.

There are members of Congress who are controlled by intel agencies. A high-ranking member of the House Intel Committee admitted to being spied on by the NSA. Even though he provides oversight, they still monitor him. Michael McCall, a leader among neoconservatives, accused someone of being a Russian agent based on what the intel briefers told him. When confronted, he defended himself by saying he believed the intel. This highlights the manipulation and control exerted by intel agencies over politicians.

There is a pervasive and dark organization that is well funded and evil. They are willing to kill people, as seen with the aide of Kelly Loeffler in Georgia who was blown up in his car. He was dating Governor Kemp's daughter. Governor Kemp was considering a signature audit, and the lead investigator from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation suddenly died within a week. There is a lot of money and power at stake here, as it involves the leadership and control of the most powerful country in the world.

Politicians fear intel agencies due to potential blackmail, compromising democracy. Elected officials with hidden secrets allow abuses to persist. Speculation on reasons for inaction includes personal flaws and blackmail. A powerful official acknowledged this reality, highlighting a systemic issue of compromise and control.

Washington's leadership selection system is seen as broken, relying on lobbyists and special interest money. Kevin McCarthy, for example, raised and distributed $500 million in the last election cycle, highlighting the money-for-support dynamic. To challenge this cartel-like system, a different approach was sought. The desired changes can be categorized into three main areas.

Members of Congress are intimidated by intelligence agencies, which undermines democracy. Elected officials are supposed to represent the people, but when unelected individuals make significant decisions without accountability, it creates a system akin to tyranny. Many committee chairpersons overlook abuses, such as warrantless spying and UAP disclosures, possibly due to personal vulnerabilities that could be exploited. A conversation with a senior elected official revealed an acknowledgment of this troubling reality, suggesting that the existence of such control is recognized but not addressed. This raises the question of why this situation persists.

The deep state refers to career employees within the U.S. government and military who influence policy without being directly accountable to elected officials. Agencies like the FCC, CIA, SEC, and IRS have the power to enact regulations that can significantly impact our lives, often more than laws passed by Congress. These regulations, totaling 200,000 since 1975 and spanning 800,000 pages, demonstrate that the deep state is not a secret but a well-established reality. Unfortunately, these career employees cannot be easily fired, ensuring that political interests have limited influence over them. This situation highlights a concerning aspect of our governance that needs to be acknowledged.

Congressional leadership meets with lobbyists and corporate power in secret to negotiate deals for the federal spending bill. They then present a 5,000-page omnibus bill to members of Congress, pressuring them to sign it or risk blocking funding for troops and veterans' benefits. This is seen as blackmail and extortion. Congressman Matt Gaetz proposed a simple solution: present individual funding proposals for debate and voting. However, they know that funding for war and military corporations would face opposition. Instead, they manipulate the situation by threatening to cut off benefits for vulnerable groups, like veterans and the elderly. Gaetz's efforts to keep the government open and ensure troops are paid are commendable. This highlights the influence of lobbyists and multinational corporations.

The District of Columbia is no longer working for the American people. Bills are controlled by a public-private partnership tied to the globalist agenda, aiming to erode US sovereignty and freedoms. The Davos crew and banking cartel are manipulating leaders for the Great Reset, pushing for digital currency and climate change policies. The US is under attack from within, with efforts to divide based on race, religion, and more. This is an international battle against the loss of sovereignty and freedom.

Congress members fear intel agencies, hindering oversight. Unelected officials make big decisions, undermining democracy. Committee heads may have secrets, leading to inaction on important issues. Powerful figures acknowledge control by intel agencies, raising concerns about ongoing abuses. Why do we tolerate this? Translation: Members of Congress are afraid of intelligence agencies, which hinders their ability to oversee them. When unelected individuals make significant decisions, it undermines the democratic process. Committee leaders may have hidden agendas, preventing action on critical matters. Influential individuals admit to being controlled by intelligence agencies, prompting questions about why this behavior is allowed to continue.

In Washington, there is a lot of sexual perversion among the older politicians. As a young person, I have admired many of these individuals, but I have been shocked by their behavior. I have been invited to attend sexual orgies at their homes, which is disturbing. Additionally, some of these leaders who claim to be fighting addiction have openly used cocaine in front of me. It's a crazy situation.

The transcript covers a broad set of interwoven claims about global health security, intelligence operations, political conspiracies, and alleged CIA influence on U.S. leadership. Key points include: - Pandemic preparedness and global infrastructure: There is discussion that an airborne, deadly disease could emerge, and to deal with it effectively we must put in place infrastructure globally and domestically to see, isolate, and respond quickly. The investment is framed as a smart, long-term insurance against future flu strains like the Spanish flu, especially in a globalized world. - CIA and presidency dynamics: The day after an election, the CIA director allegedly authorizes a president-elect to begin receiving a President’s Daily Brief (PDB) and uses the briefing to “suck him in,” presenting impressive can-dos that shape the new president’s perceptions and questions. This is described as psychological profiling and manipulation, with the CIA using long-standing methods to influence a president and government direction. - Allegations of a covert cabal influencing U.S. institutions: The conversation suggests a cabal has aimed to destroy U.S. institutions from within, including defunding the military and ordering actions that undermine allies while aiding enemies. This cabal allegedly includes control over the FBI, DOJ, and the presidency, culminated in the appointment of James Comey to head the FBI, portrayed as a “cardinal” with ties to the Clinton Foundation and as part of broader cabal activity. - 2008–2011 FBI and political corruption narrative: An asset described as a high-level foreign agent allegedly influenced U.S. politics and was connected to multiple intelligence services, with claims about his role in internal U.S. political manipulation. The rise of a president referred to as “Renegade,” identified as Barry Sartaro (Barry Soetoro), is described as part of the cabal’s plan to destabilize the United States from within, including military demoralization and misdirection. - Barack Obama conspiracy theories: The dialogue asserts that Barack Obama’s origins and identity have been manipulated for political purposes, including claims about a forged birth certificate, ongoing questions about birth location, and various individuals connected to Hawaii’s health department and local authorities providing or denying birth certificate verification. References include Loretta Fuddy and investigations into Obama’s birth details, with assertions that Obama’s name and identity were manipulated in Indonesia (Barry Soetoro) and that his family connections tie to CIA-backed operations in Asia. - Indonesia coup and CIA involvement: The conversation links Obama’s family to CIA-backed activities in Indonesia, including the overthrow of Sukarno and the rise of Suharto, with relatives described as having roles in money channels and death squads. The narrative asserts that Lolo Soetoro acted in intelligence-adjacent roles and that Obama’s grandmother helped channel CIA funds in the region. - Claims about CIA media manipulation and “MK Ultra” style operations: The speakers reference Operation Mockingbird, MK Ultra, and other CIA operations as public knowledge used to undermine the American people. They suggest continued silencing and manipulation by those operations. - Kill lists and drone warfare under the Obama administration: The transcript alleges that John Brennan led “Tuesday morning kill list” meetings starting in 2009, with drones and targeted killings used to eliminate designated individuals, and asserts confidence that Obama’s administration excelled at deploying missile strikes and other covert actions, contrasted with the possibility of ongoing use by subsequent administrations. - Recurrent thread of distrust in institutions: Across pandemic planning, birth certificate controversy, foreign influence, CIA cabal theories, and drone warfare, the overarching theme is distrust of established institutions and assertion of deep, planned manipulation by covert actors.

The extent of corruption in our elections is unknown. Many candidates, regardless of party, may have paid to manipulate the system for personal profit. This isn't just about seizing power; it's incredibly lucrative. Consider the global interests influencing news organizations and the pressure from social media to silence dissent. This is a massive, well-funded campaign to undermine our fundamental right to preserve our republic. This is a critical moment, a pivotal struggle for our nation's future, echoing the fight of 1775.

I'm going to be the bad guy and I want to get away with as much as possible to enrich myself. You're all my co-conspirators helping me legally. My campaign is entirely funded by corporate PACs, like those from the fossil fuel, healthcare, and big pharma industries. I can even use dark money to pay off people to cover up skeletons. Once elected, I have the power to shape laws without limits. Being funded by oil and gas or big pharma means I can write laws benefiting them without restrictions. I want to get rich, so I can hold stocks in an oil company and then write laws to deregulate the industry, causing the stock value to soar. Does this sound familiar? Our system is broken, with these influences shaping the questions being asked right now.

The speaker discusses internal resistance to RFK Jr.’s policies and the idea that “deep staters” have been entrenched in government. They mention being forwarded an anecdote from a “good career employee.” They point to the FDA, noting that when Marty Makary came in, he had only about 10 political appointees he could choose. Jay Bhattacharya at the NIH allegedly had one political appointee. The speaker claims that every government employee is a “deep stater” who has been there a long time and that an email from a good employee circulates a CIA manual called How to Be a Bad Bureaucrat and Subvert an Institution from Within. The email supposedly asserts that 90% of employees at HHS, which has 70,000 employees, are talking in lunchrooms about the manual and telling each other that their job is to save America and save science from the agenda of President Trump and RFK Jr. The speaker asserts this reflects how people think across major departments and asks how to get rid of them, suggesting firing them as a solution, and mentions SIOP in this context. The CDC is presented as a case study of failure, described as a public health disaster in its COVID-19 response. The speaker alleges that the CDC’s guidance on school lockdowns copied directly from a teacher union document with which they were aligned, reproducing paragraphs from the teacher’s union advocating for two years of school shutdowns. It is claimed that the CDC also said that cloth masks were fine. The speaker says the CDC led the response and that the NIH funded the entire pandemic, including gain-of-function research, asserting that this constitutes “the creation of the pandemic.” In contrast, RFK Jr. is said to have fired three employees, and this action is described as national news. The overall narrative emphasizes a view of pervasive internal opposition within federal agencies, a controversial and sweeping critique of the CDC, NIH, and HHS responses to the pandemic, and a framing of RFK Jr.’s personnel decisions as transformative and newsworthy.