TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Scott Quiner was hospitalized with serious lung problems and diagnosed with COVID-19. His wife, Anne, pleaded with doctors to treat him with HCQ, ivermectin, zinc, and vitamin D, but they refused. Anne reached out to journalist Stu Peters and attorney Thomas Renz for help. After an interview with Anne went viral, the hospital released Scott. He was transferred to another hospital but sadly passed away. This story highlights the power of people's voices and the need for organized action. The video also discusses strategies for dealing with hospital protocols and advocating for loved ones. It emphasizes the importance of spreading knowledge and information to fight against corruption and injustice.

At home, it is recommended to treat viral replication by giving remedies like zinc and hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, which reduce the spread of the disease. However, the protocol followed was different. No treatment was given until hospitalization, where ventilators and Remdesivir were used. It is known that Remdesivir can be harmful, as it caused side effects in Ebola patients. The drug was manipulated and made standard of care, leading to kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in COVID-19 patients. The deaths during the pandemic were often attributed to kidney failure, which was caused by Remdesivir, not the virus itself.

I believe the hospital is responsible for my husband's death. I sought Ivermectin for him and took legal action after he had been intubated for a week. The judge ruled that I could have a certified nurse administer it, but the hospital resisted. There was a 12-hour standoff in the ICU, and they even called the police on me. I signed a waiver to assume any risks, yet they still blocked the treatment. I don't understand their refusal to provide a drug that might have helped him. Additionally, I want to know how much financial support the hospital received after his death, as it was listed as a COVID-19 death. It seems there must have been some financial incentive for their refusal to treat him properly.

Unvaccinated patients entering the hospital reported being treated differently based on their vaccination status. Those who had not received the COVID-19 shot were quickly given treatments like remdesivir and placed on ventilators, leading to a high mortality rate. There are claims that hospitals had financial incentives to classify deaths as COVID-related, with some receiving substantial payments for each case. Whistleblowers from within the healthcare system indicated that staff were pressured to ensure positive COVID tests to secure funding. The financial motives behind these practices raised serious ethical concerns, with one individual stating that their loved one was valued more dead than alive due to these incentives.

A person at a book signing told the speaker a story about Remdesivir. According to the story, a woman's sister was in the hospital when a doctor ordered a second round of Remdesivir. The nurse cautioned the doctor that the patient had four young children. The doctor then rescinded the order. The speaker claims this shows the doctor and nurse knew the drug was killing people, but spared the patient because she had children. The speaker believes that without children, the doctor would have administered the drug and killed her anyway. The speaker concludes this reflects the personalities, behaviors, and ethos of hospital staff.

I'm Karen DeVore, a dermatologist in South Carolina. I've been prescribing hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for over 30 years, off-label. In 2020, the FDA called Ivermectin horse medicine and doctors couldn't prescribe it. I knew these drugs were safe and effective, and I saw great results in my patients. None of the patients I treated with these drugs were hospitalized or died from COVID. They had no side effects and felt better within hours. It's frustrating that insurance companies and pharmacies denied access to these drugs. Even terminally ill patients on ventilators couldn't try them. How many lives could have been saved?

I contracted COVID from my gardener, who sadly passed away after we both went to the same hospital. We both received remdesivir, which I later learned can cause serious harm, including kidney failure. I struggled to walk for three months afterward. It raises questions about the decisions made by health authorities, especially regarding the restriction of monoclonal antibodies. This seems driven by a desire to promote vaccines for profit, which is deeply troubling. The prioritization of money over human lives is a real and concerning issue.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

Treating viral replication at home can be done with zinc and zinc-enhancing remedies like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. However, the protocol followed during the pandemic did not include these treatments. Instead, patients were only treated when they reached the hospital, where they were given ventilators and Remdesivir. It is known that Remdesivir can be lethal, as it caused kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in many cases. The deaths during the pandemic were often attributed to kidney failure, which was actually caused by Remdesivir, not the virus itself.

Speaker 0 describes contracting COVID from his gardener, noting that the gardener had it first and died, while he survived. He says, “I got COVID from my gardener, and he had it first, and then I got it. I was like, ah, did I grab the hose or what, you know, what was I don't know. But it was it was I knew the guy for twenty years, and we both went to the same hospital. And he died, and I didn't. Jesus.” He claims they both received remdesivir, saying, “I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good. Not good. Not good. Causes kidney failure. I know.” He adds that he couldn’t walk for three months after receiving that treatment and that, “I couldn't walk for three months after I had that stuff. Really? Because it kills you.” He says he learned afterward that remdesivir “kills you,” and he ties this to a question about Fauci: “and that's why I wonder about Fauci, you know.” Speaker 1 responds, suggesting that the audience should indeed “wonder about that guy,” and contrasts this with actions he describes as preventing people from obtaining monoclonal antibodies: “Oh, you should wonder about that guy. When meanwhile, they were trying to stop people from getting monoclonal antibodies.” He criticizes the restriction of monoclonal antibodies as “fucking insane” because it followed a push to promote vaccines for profit, stating, “They've restricted monoclonal antibodies, which is fucking insane because they wanted to promote that vaccine because they wanted a profit off of it, which brings us back again to evil.” He asserts, “Evil's real. It's real. Putting money over human lives is evil. I agree.” He adds that there is a temptation to pursue such income, calling it “a real thing,” and reaffirms, “and there's a there's a temptation to do it too, which is even more crazy. Yeah.”

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they’re cancer-free. They took Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Methylene Blue, which has surprising benefits for mitochondria. It’s concerning how effective treatments are often ignored for profit. I got COVID and received remdesivir, which caused severe issues, while a friend died. There’s a troubling trend of prioritizing profit over lives in healthcare. Monoclonal antibodies were restricted to promote vaccines, which raises ethical questions. Mel Gibson and others are starting to speak out against these issues, highlighting the dangers of certain treatments and the need for awareness. We must recognize the importance of sharing knowledge and supporting those who fight against these injustices.

Monoclonal antibodies worked very well and quickly, and were initially readily available. The speaker believes the government intentionally made them harder to get to encourage people to take the COVID shot. The speaker didn't use ivermectin until the government took over distribution of monoclonal antibodies. In March, the government put out information on why people should not take ivermectin for COVID on the FDA's website. At the same time, they launched COVID-nineteen Community Core on 04/01/2021, an $11,500,000,000 slush fund to feed out propaganda.

At home, it is recommended to treat viral replication by giving zinc and other zinc-enhancing remedies like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. However, the protocol followed by hospitals was to provide no treatment until admission, and then use ventilators and Remdesivir, which were known to be harmful. Tony Fauci was aware of the dangers of Remdesivir, as it caused lethal side effects in Ebola patients. Despite this, he manipulated a study to make Remdesivir the standard of care, resulting in kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in COVID-19 patients. The deaths attributed to the virus were actually caused by Remdesivir.

Ivermectin is a widely used and safe drug that has been effective against SARS CoV 2. It could have saved many lives if it had been used more widely. Doctors who tried to use it faced prosecution, despite its safety and effectiveness. One doctor worked 715 continuous days without a day off because no one else wanted to care for indigent patients. The doctor's hospital had a low mortality rate compared to the rest of the country, thanks to protocols that included Ivermectin. However, the media ignored their success and the use of repurposed drugs. The doctor faced censorship on social media platforms for mentioning Ivermectin. The FDA claims there are no adequate alternatives to the vaccines, but many believe unnecessary deaths occurred due to censorship and lack of access to Ivermectin.

In 1970, a Japanese biochemist named Satoshi Omorra discovered a bacterium with intriguing effects against roundworm and shared it with American colleague William Campbell of Merck. Campbell used the bacterium to create ivermectin, released by Merck in 1980. Ivermectin proved extremely effective against river blindness (onchocerciasis), a disease caused by a parasitic worm that affected Central and South America and much of Africa. With ivermectin, river blindness has been largely eliminated in the Americas and greatly reduced in Africa. Billions of doses have been administered; it is listed among the World Health Organization’s essential medicines. Merck’s patent expired in 1996; the drug is cheap to produce, globally available in various formulations, and, at normal dosages, has no important side effects. In 2015, Omurra received the Nobel Prize for Medicine, shared with Campbell. Fast forward to early 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic spread. Scientists searched for drugs with antiviral activity, and Monash University in Australia conducted a literature search that found ivermectin had shown activity against Zika, West Nile, and influenza. They performed experiments and found that ivermectin displays remarkable activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, reporting a 5,000-fold reduction in viral levels after a single treatment without cytotoxicity, and proposed a mechanism for this effect. Around the same time, two American scientists noted that ivermectin was used as prophylaxis against river blindness in Africa and examined whether widespread ivermectin prophylaxis correlated with COVID-19 rates. They found that countries with extensive ivermectin prophylaxis had significantly lower COVID-19 rates. In Miami, Dr. Jean Jacques Reiter, a critical care and pulmonary specialist, treated COVID-19 patients with ivermectin after being urged by a patient’s son. He reported rapid improvement: the patient’s FiO2 requirements declined within 48 hours, and she was discharged within about a week. Reiter treated many patients with ivermectin and published a June 2020 preprint; he later testified before a Senate committee about his experiences. He stated that among hundreds of outpatients treated by his team, only two were admitted to the hospital; neither died or required intubation. Uncontrolled studies on ivermectin as prophylaxis and treatment circulated globally. A daughter described a care-home incident in Ontario, where residents on a floor receiving high-dose ivermectin for scabies reportedly had no COVID-19 infections among residents, even as staff on that floor became infected. In New York, Pierre Corry teamed with Reiter and Paul Merrick to form the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). In October 2020, the FLCCC released the Eye Mask Plus protocol, centering on ivermectin for prevention and treatment, and published a meta-analysis reviewing nine studies on prophylaxis and 12 studies on treatment, including seven randomized trials, all showing ivermectin’s superiority to controls. They presented figures showing reduced mortality and case rates associated with ivermectin use in various regions, including Peru, Mexico (Chiapas), and Argentina (healthcare workers). On December 8, 2020, FLCCC members appeared before a Senate subcommittee, with testimony claiming mountains of data showing ivermectin’s miraculous effectiveness and requesting the NIH to review their data. The transcript asserts widespread suppression of ivermectin information by mainstream media (New York Times, AP), big tech (YouTube, Twitter, Facebook), and the NIH. It alleges the NIH COVID-19 treatment guidelines panel, established in April 2020, largely recommended against early treatment and promoted remdesivir instead, even though remdesivir’s mortality impact was unproven and the World Health Organization advised against its use for improving survival. The panel’s treatment recommendations (as of 01/03/2021) are cited, highlighting monoclonal antibodies for early patients and no other treatments, except for remdesivir for deteriorating patients. Fauci publicly touted remdesivir’s endpoint as time to recovery, with the primary endpoint reportedly changed mid-trial from mortality to time to recovery, raising concerns about impartiality. The transcript traces remdesivir's production by Gilead Sciences and notes financial ties: seven panel members disclosed funding from Gilead; two of the three panel chairs received Gilead support, and Clifford Lane (one co-author on a remdesivir study) was closely connected to the study, with undisclosed ties among other authors. It argues these ties could impact decision-making and bias toward remdesivir over cheaper, repurposed drugs like ivermectin. The narrative then contrasts the U.S. approach with Uttar Pradesh, India, which authorized ivermectin as prophylaxis and treatment in August 2020. In January 2021, Uttar Pradesh reported near-zero COVID-19 deaths, while the United States faced ongoing high mortality, suggesting potential differential outcomes if ivermectin had been broadly authorized. The closing remarks emphasize the suffering caused by COVID-19 and its broad impacts on families and society.

I worked in a small community hospital that cared for marginalized communities during COVID. I convinced the Chairman of the Board to turn the entire hospital into an ICU to handle the expected surge. I also founded the FLCCC with other doctors and developed the MathPlus protocol, which included cortisone agents, vitamin C, thiamine, heparin, and repurposed drugs like Ivermectin. Our success rate was remarkable, with a mortality rate of 4.4% compared to the national average of 25-40%. However, the media never focused on our achievements and I faced censorship on social media platforms. Many people died unnecessarily due to this censorship. The MathPlus protocol, along with good nursing and physician care, helped save lives, especially among indigent individuals who were critically ill when they arrived at the hospital.

The forest plot shows COVID medicines, with only expensive ones approved in the US. Cheaper drugs were ignored. Studies manipulated endpoints and faced negative PR. Over 420 trials on hydroxychloroquine and 100 on Ivermectin show significant benefits, but they are dismissed in the US.

Treating viral infections at home can be done by providing remedies that inhibit viral replication, such as zinc and substances that enhance zinc like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. However, the protocol followed during the pandemic did not include these treatments. Instead, patients were only treated once they reached the hospital, where they were given ventilators and Remdesivir. It is known that Remdesivir can be lethal, as it caused kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in many cases. The deaths attributed to the virus were often a result of Remdesivir rather than the virus itself.

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes alongside ventilators, emphasizing the importance of proper care. Patients were intubated early, leading to high mortality rates. The medical system's focus on COVID treatments caused harm, with nurses bearing the brunt of patient care.

The tragedy is that many young, healthy individuals under 50, who had minimal risk from COVID, were injured. A significant percentage of the population has documented cases of COVID. These individuals would have been fine if left alone. Instead, many were harmed, often against their better judgment, as they felt pressured to comply with mandates to keep their jobs or attend school.

In 2018, remdesivir had a high kill rate in Africa, making it unsuitable for Ebola trials. Yet, in 2020, it became the top choice for treating COVID-19. Despite objections from the World Health Organization, Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx endorsed its use. The issue lies in allowing those with financial interests to dictate pandemic responses, potentially influenced by eugenics ideologies.

Treat COVID at home with zinc, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and other remedies that reduce viral spread. Current protocol delays treatment until hospitalization, using harmful ventilators and remdesivir. Fauci knew remdesivir's dangers from Ebola trials. He manipulated data to make it standard care, causing kidney and heart failure. Many pandemic deaths were due to remdesivir, not the virus.

Monoclonal antibodies worked very well and quickly, and were initially readily available. The speaker believes the government intentionally made them harder to get to encourage people to take the COVID shot. The speaker started using ivermectin when monoclonal antibodies became difficult to obtain. In March, the government put out information on the FDA's website about why people should not take ivermectin for COVID. Simultaneously, the government launched COVID-nineteen Community Core on 04/01/2021, an $11,500,000,000 slush fund for propaganda.

Once it was determined to be safe, the speaker began using a treatment and found that it worked. Over 6,000 patients were treated, and those who received early treatment avoided hospitalization. Some patients came in very sick in their second week, with oxygen saturation in the low 80s, refusing to go to the hospital. The speaker's office offered them the option to possibly die there. They treated these patients with IV steroids, IV antibiotics, home oxygen, and high doses of ivermectin, without using monoclonal antibodies, and the patients were saved.

According to the speaker, hospital protocols differed for vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 patients, with more aggressive protocols used on the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated patients interviewed were often given remdesivir, a repurposed drug from a failed Ebola trial where about half the patients died. The speaker claims the efficacy data for remdesivir was "sketchy at best," but hospitals received large reimbursements for its use. The speaker alleges that patients would then be put on oxygen, then mechanical ventilation, then ICU, and finally, if they resisted, a cocktail of sedatives and sometimes four-point restraints to prevent them from leaving. The speaker states that "a lot of the patients died." The speaker claims that at each step, the hospital received more reimbursement, and there was "lockstep adherence" to the protocol.