TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker insists on a real inquiry into everything that happened during COVID-19, stating that those responsible must be held accountable, but currently are not. The speaker accuses authorities of wanting to move on from what they did during the "COVID hysteria," but the speaker believes their actions were not okay. They claim their charter of rights was not respected.

Illegal blockades are harming Canadians and foreign money is funding this illegal activity. The border will not stay closed. Politicians don't control the police in a democratic society, but everything is being considered to stop this unlawful activity. If you joined the protests due to COVID frustrations, you must realize that you are breaking the law. We understand your frustration with COVID and the safety measures in place.

As of 4 PM today, Nova Scotia is banning all activities in the woods due to extreme dry conditions and wildfire risk. This includes hiking, camping, fishing, and vehicle use. Trail systems are off limits. While some agree with the ban, others believe walking should be allowed as long as fire safety is observed. Trail operators acknowledge the necessity but note it will slow down planned expansions and upgrades. Violators face a $25,000 fine. Camping is permitted at registered campsites, and exceptions exist for work in the woods with a permit, potentially including nighttime operations on Crown Lands. The premier cites a dry weather forecast and the desire to prevent a major wildfire similar to the one outside of Halifax two years ago as the reason for the ban.

Speaking from the Truckers Freedom Convoy in Downtown Ottawa, the speaker highlights the Canadian government's actions under Prime Minister Trudeau, which they claim have infringed upon citizens' charter rights and truckers' ability to make a living due to vaccination status. They express concern over the Chief of the City Police for Ottawa's recent announcements, stating that oppressive measures typically seen in oppressive regimes will be implemented. The speaker emphasizes that Canadian's rights to peaceful assembly and freedom of expression are being violated, urging others to spread awareness of the situation.

Speaker 0 argues that climate lockdowns are here and that in Nova Scotia people could be fined $25,000 for going outside, such as taking a hike. They claim Canadians have been told that climate change causes wildfires, but now the blame is being placed on individuals who need to be stopped. They state that activities like riding a bike, hiking, and fishing do not cause wildfires, and that more often the cause is state control. They reference the “shoe swap fires in BC,” asserting that Cliff Chapman, director of wildfire operations, admitted the fires were started with a controlled ignition. They claim: “We did conduct a planned ignition on that fire last Thursday,” and that winds approaching the Caribou Fire Centre caused a fire to breach the control line and sweep into communities along the North Shushua. Speaker 0 continues by mentioning the Lytton fires, alleging they were caused by the RCMP, and that the BC RCMP took responsibility for an out-of-control wildfire north of Lytton, the Eisman Creek wildfire, near Highway 12, stating that equipment failed and that the incident was “obviously, very unintentional. Oops. Our bad.” They pivot to criticize Nova Scotians, saying they must be stopped at all costs, and reference Nova Scotia’s crime and punishment guide to illustrate fines for various offenses. Speaker 0 lists fines from the Nova Scotia guide: drunk driving, a thousand dollars; assault, five thousand; using a phone while driving, five hundred; driving without insurance, two to five thousand; shoplifting under five thousand, a thousand; speeding 40 kilometers over the limit, four hundred; trespass on private property, five hundred; illegal dumping, fifty to five thousand; vandalism, one thousand to five thousand. They highlight the walk, hike, or bike in the woods, with a stated fine of twenty-five thousand dollars. They mention a snitch line designed to encourage reporting neighbors who might hike in the woods, suggesting people could submit fake reports and overwhelm the system, with an example line about seeing a totally flaming prime minister outside. Speaker 1 provides a response quote about the planned ignition, stating, “We did conduct a planned ignition on that fire last Thursday. We did it cautiously. We knew the winds were coming,” describing how winds approaching through the Caribou Fire Centre created a continuous line of fuel, and how the fire went above the control line and swept back into communities in the North Shushua.

During COVID-19, the speaker believes the government was authoritarian and imposed a vaccine passport. As an unvaccinated person, the speaker was unable to travel across the country. When asked if they regretted not getting vaccinated, the speaker stated it was the best decision of their life.

The government crossed a bright red line when it suppressed scientific and policy discussions during COVID, treating dissenting voices as akin to those of international terrorists. This suppression is wrong; free speech, allowing debate among scientists, policymakers, and the public, is a fundamental American norm. The government's actions prevented this debate, leading to harmful lockdown policies, vaccine mandates, job losses, prolonged school closures, and economic devastation. This censorship, ironically, cost lives. Contrary to claims that free speech is dangerous during a pandemic, upholding the First Amendment would have saved lives and reduced the damage and destruction we experienced.

There is a small fringe minority with unacceptable views on their way to Ottawa, but they do not represent the majority of Canadians. Canadians believe in supporting each other and following scientific guidelines to protect one another. This is the best way to safeguard our freedoms, rights, and values as a country.

The chief medical officer of health and Alberta Health Services have stated on record that there is no material evidence to support the Public Health Act related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This lack of evidence undermines the scientific basis for the measures taken. I encourage everyone to request my court transcripts and related documents under the Freedom of Information Act; I have copies available. You can reach me on Instagram at real_patrick_king, TikTok as Canadian Patriot, or Twitter at Canadian Patriot 77. I face significant censorship online, with my accounts often being shut down. Much of my work, including investigations and travels related to major infrastructure projects, has been erased from the internet.

The speaker insists on a real inquiry into everything that happened during COVID-19, stating those responsible must be held accountable, but currently are not. The speaker claims that authorities want to move on from their actions during the "COVID hysteria," but that this is unacceptable. They believe their charter of rights was not respected.

In 2019, the Canadian government removed the crime of spreading false news from the Criminal Code. This raises concerns about trusting a government that takes our money, restricts effective treatments, and fails to investigate the safety of promoted vaccines. Additionally, the parliament we elect allows mainstream media to freely lie without consequences.

The recent events in Canada are shocking. A peaceful movement of truckers, workers, and families protesting for their rights has faced violent repression. Their assets have been frozen, and they have been labeled as Nazis, racists, and terrorists. Many have been arrested on false charges and accused of foreign loyalties, despite their clear love for their country. They are being treated worse than serious criminals. A critical line has been drawn: you either support the peaceful truckers or align with the oppressive forces against them. We stand with the truckers and the Canadian people in their fight for freedom. Thank you.

Viva Fry contrasts justice and vengeance: “Vengeance is get demanding more retribution than what is required, and justice is a question of getting that which is fair and proportionate. Vengeance implies an injustice. Justice implies righteousness.” He outlines leaving big-law Montreal for independent practice and shifting to YouTube law commentary, where censorship—“the opaqueness is the feature, not the bug”—emerged after his Alex Jones/Sandy Hook deposition analysis. He recounts the Ottawa trucker protest, livestreaming for hours to counter media “inversion of reality.” He cites Nova Scotia’s ban on hiking, camping, and fishing with $25,000 fines, and notes the federal quarantine act enforcing fourteen days for unvaccinated entrants. In Quebec, defamation can occur even if statements are true if uttered to cause harm. He ends with, “What is your price? If your price is not your life, then you are for sale.”

In the Peckford Charter Challenge cross examinations, government officials and external experts were brought in to testify. The head epidemiologist for the Public Health Agency of Canada admitted that they never recommended vaccinating air travelers. The experts' written advice focused on masking, spacing, and quarantine for sick individuals, but not vaccination. When confronted, the head epidemiologist stated that scientific evidence did not support the effectiveness of vaccination. This disconnect between politicians and experts suggests that the Liberal government has been prioritizing politics over Canadians' charter rights. The cross examinations, which began in mid-May and are set to conclude at the end of June, have been a grueling daily schedule.

Opposing or questioning the president, his administration, or policies in Canada can lead to being labeled an enemy of the state. The autocratic leader in Canada has used authoritarian tactics to suppress peaceful protests, including emergency powers, freezing bank accounts, seizing children, and destroying livelihoods. This situation raises the question: what are they afraid of? The answer is simple: they fear a free people and a free society. Thomas Jefferson's words about leaders preferring despotism over liberty seem fitting. They fear the freedom that allows us to seek truth, speak freely, and question their decisions. They fear losing power, even though our founders believed in the people's right to alter or abolish a destructive government.

I am here to ask Justin Trudeau basic questions about the carbon tax. Seven premiers oppose the tax hike, including Danielle Smith. The police are behaving strangely, following me and not allowing me to approach the prime minister. We just want answers to questions that Canadians care about. This behavior is outrageous and unnecessary.

Counselor Lisa Robinson reports that in Nova Scotia, Canada, people cannot go into the forest from now until mid October. Hiking, camping, walking dogs or children on trails are banned to supposedly prevent wildfires. She says this mirrors the COVID-19-era restrictions that limited outdoor activity and saw neighbors reporting on each other, and argues that the same mindset is used again here, this time claiming a fire-season excuse. She notes disobedience can result in fines over 25,000. She questions what kind of country bans walking in nature and warns that people are leaving Canada, with messages she’s received from residents leaving Pickering over the situation. Robinson highlights a contrast: while banning access to woods, Nova Scotia approved glyphosate spraying on thousands of acres of drought-stricken, fire-prone forests. She points out that glyphosate kills vegetation, dries it out, and leaves behind more flammable tinder, while experts say it destroys deciduous trees and shrubs that hold moisture and slow fire. She cites Safe Food Matters, which warns that glyphosate dries down forest growth, creating forest fuel. She questions whether the policy is truly about preventing fires or about controlling people. She notes there are still supporters who call for stricter government control, describing a mindset of wanting governance to be harder and more in control. She contrasts this with her view and says they are not going to pretend the situation is normal. Robinson mentions Tamara Lynch and Chris Barber, who face seven or eight years in prison for a peaceful protest. She states she has spoken up about corruption at the highest levels in her city, losing a year and three months of pay for telling the truth, and asserts that others can burn down a church and get bail, while organizers or truth-tellers are targeted financially. Robinson declares she is an elected official who will not stay quiet, insisting on telling the truth to protect it. She warns that if they can ban people from the woods while spraying chemicals that increase fire risk, one must wonder what they’ll ban next. She identifies herself as counselor Lisa Robinson, the people’s counselor, and commits to speaking openly. She urges viewers to believe real power lies with the people, asking them to follow, subscribe, and share to stand with them. She closes with a call to stand strong, stay fierce, and God bless.

Every Canadian has the right to enter and leave Canada, as stated in the Charter of Rights. During the pandemic, over 4 million people were effectively trapped in the country for more than two years, despite evidence that vaccinated individuals could still contract and spread COVID-19. While 90% of vaccinated individuals had freedom of movement, the 10% who were unvaccinated faced restrictions, causing family separations and trauma. Additionally, the Emergency Measures Act was deemed illegal by the courts, raising questions about the lack of consequences for those involved. The freezing of individuals' bank accounts during this time was also considered unlawful search and seizure.

Canada will be a police state by Christmas if parliament passes bills c two, c eight, and c nine in their current form. C two is the Strong Borders Act. It should be called the Strong Surveillance Act. It empowers Canada Post to open letter mail without a warrant, it criminalizes the use of cash in amounts greater than 10,000, and it empowers a vast army of government officials, not just police, to conduct warrantless searches of the computers and cell phones of Canadians. It is a massive invasion of privacy. It's extremely dangerous. There have been warnings that the Online Harms Act, which prior to the last election was known as bill c 63, might be reintroduced. If brought back and passed into law, you're gonna see the Canadian Human Rights Commission with massive new powers to prosecute Canadians over offensive noncriminal speech with penalties up to $50,000. You're gonna see a digital safety commission with a vast army of bureaucrats to enforce federal regulations that are passed in respect of of the Internet and Internet contents. And you're gonna see Canadians punished preemptively based because their neighbor fears that they might commit a hate speech crime in future, the Online Harms Act would authorize judges to place Canadians under house arrest, wear an ankle bracelet in respect to curfew, etcetera. Giving the federal government giving federal cabinet ministers power to kick Canadians off the Internet is not necessary for protecting public safety or defending our national security. Our freedoms are fragile. It's imperative that every Canadian contact their member of parliament, whether your MP is liberal, conservative, NDP, block, or green, does not matter. Contact your member of parliament and tell him or her to vote against bills c two, c eight, c nine, and tell them to not bring back the online harms act.

During COVID-19, the speaker believes the government was authoritarian and imposed a vaccine passport. Because the speaker is unvaccinated, they were unable to travel across the country. When asked if they regret not being vaccinated, the speaker said no, stating it was the best decision of their life.

Jeff Evely says this is the woods in their sector of the province, noting that Timmy Houston, a “benevolent dictator tyrant,” granted permission to enter the woods despite a high wildfire risk, whereas during moderate risk the sneakers were not allowed, and during low risk they might have caused a wildfire and were banned. He emphasizes that permission is not the same as freedom. He cites Friedrich Hayek from the constitution of liberty, saying a free society is free of coercion, and he contends that governments are attempting to coerce the population into following their latest projects. Evely adds that he serves in Canada’s military, but that serving isn’t the only reason he joined; he feels a strong urge to go on adventures and that without a mission to pursue, war could turn inward and destroy him. He describes a therapeutic benefit to getting lost in the woods, and quips that if he breaks his leg, he won’t call Susan Holt for ammunition to use against the population. Evely admits he’s currently in unfamiliar territory, having never been to this waterfall before, and mentions Iron Ball Ironville Mountain in Nova Scotia, explaining the woods move and change like in the movie Labyrinth. He recalls a previous trip with Axel where he had no phone, compass, watch, map, or water, and it took six hours to find the way out; he asserts that, as long as you don’t panic, you’ll be fine. He believes that from growing up there, a person can walk in a straight line in any direction and eventually find a path back to civilization. He jokes about last time getting lost but not breaking his legs, addressing Susan Hall. Evely then criticizes people who achieve power by conforming, calling them “squishy, entitled, bureaucratically minded, tyrants” who are fearful cowards and expect others to be like them. If those in charge are to manage a walk in the woods, others must be locked in their homes and treated as dependent. He concludes that the therapeutic benefit of being outdoors is real and asserts, “This is why we live in Nova Scotia,” declaring that “Nova Scotia is the woods.” He notes people accuse him of causing a wildfire for simply taking a ticket, comparing the inconsistent restrictions to arbitrary, capricious totalitarianism in the Atlantic provinces over the years. Evely asserts that freedom does not equal permission and that rights must be assertive, urging action in this historical moment. He signs off with a wish for everyone to enjoy the woods and notes there is still much work to do in the Atlantic Provinces because they’re not out of the woods yet.

Fear is dangerous and unpredictable, whether it's fueled by a judge or a Prime Minister. Canadians are being urged to fear each other, which is concerning and a threat to our liberty.