TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I'm at the building where the supposed sniper took a shot. It's not steep, a 7-year-old could climb up easily. Secret Service should have been on the water tower behind me to prevent this. The president was speaking from the stage behind me. There are questions in Butler, but we will investigate to ensure it never happens again. Translation: I am at the building where the alleged sniper shot from. It's not very steep, even a 7-year-old could climb up easily. Secret Service should have been on the water tower behind me to prevent this. The president was speaking from the stage behind me. There are questions in Butler, but we will investigate to ensure it never happens again.

I'm at the location where the shooter was positioned. As a 70-year-old man, I can confirm that this area is not difficult to access. It's hard to believe anyone would say that Secret Service agents couldn't have been here. The shooter had a clear line of sight to the president, making the shot feasible.

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The speaker describes their location relative to Trump, stating they were to his left. They then describe bleachers to Trump's left, which were to the speaker's right. The speaker claims the "unaliving" happened on the far right side of Trump, while they were on the far left. The speaker asserts the shots came from the back left of Trump, showing footage of people indicating the shots' origin. They claim something happened on the left side of the event and deny being panicked or unable to remember details. The speaker states the first shot was farther away to the right of Trump, and the second shot was closer. They insist two men were shot from behind the left side of the bleachers to the left of Trump. The speaker believes there was more than one shooter, including someone on the roof to the right of Trump and another shooter on the left.

I'm at the building where the supposed sniper took a shot. It's not steep, an elderly man climbed up easily. Secret Service should have been on the water tower behind me. The president was on stage behind me. Questions in Butler, we'll investigate to prevent it from happening again.

I'm up on the building where the supposed sniper took a shot. It's not steep, a 7-year-old could climb up easily. Secret Service should have had sniper teams on the water tower behind me. Questions in Butler about why the Secret Service on the 2nd floor didn't stop the individual. The stage where the president was giving a speech is behind me. We will investigate to ensure it never happens again. Translation: I am on the building where the alleged sniper shot from. It's not very steep, even a 7-year-old could climb up easily. The Secret Service should have had sniper teams on the water tower behind me. There are questions in Butler about why the Secret Service on the 2nd floor didn't stop the individual. The stage where the president was giving a speech is behind me. We will investigate to ensure it never happens again.

Speaker 0 politely asks for the audience to lower their voices and thanks someone for their question. Speaker 1 mentions that federal authorities were not informed about certain information regarding the shooter. Speaker 0 asks for clarification on who "they" refers to. Speaker 1 explains that it was the local police who did not share the information. Speaker 0 states that the matter is under investigation and asks not to argue. Speaker 0 acknowledges the concern in the community but states that the facts are yet to be determined. Speaker 0 refuses to make assumptions and ends the conversation.

The speaker describes their location relative to Trump, stating they were on his left. They then describe bleachers to Trump's left, which were to the speaker's right. The speaker claims the "unaliving" happened on the far right side of Trump, and they were on the far left. The speaker asserts that shots came from behind the bleachers to the left of Trump, and people indicated the shots' origin to Secret Service. The speaker insists something happened on the left side of the event and denies being panicked or unclear about their memory. The first shot sounded farther away to the right of Trump, while the second sounded closer. The speaker believes two men were shot from behind the left side of the bleachers to the left of Trump. They claim there was more than one shooter, including someone on the roof to the right of Trump and another behind the bleachers to the left.

A dark figure is seen at the top as President Trump speaks. About four seconds after shots are fired, this person steps out. The speaker says they heard one shooter in the water tower and one by the fence. They screamed, "It's the sniper," and states the sniper was firing down toward the water tower. A gentleman behind the speaker, who was one seat to the right, could see the sharpshooter behind Trump. He said the sharpshooter shot to the left and killed the gentleman in the water tower.

I showed Tucker evidence from a reliable source about a missing police post. The media's story about the roof being the issue is false. The Secret Service director was told to stay quiet by the administration. If the missing post led to harm, it could have been disastrous.

I showed Tucker evidence that a police post was supposed to be present, but it didn't show up. The media is spreading a false story about the roof. The Secret Service director was told to stay quiet about this by the administration. If the police post logs show a post was missed, it could have led to a dangerous situation.

I'm on the building where the sniper supposedly shot from. It's not steep. Secret Service should've been on the water tower behind me to prevent this. There were questions in Butler about why they didn't act. We'll investigate to ensure it doesn't happen again.

I showed Tucker evidence that a police post was supposed to be at a location, but it didn't show up. The media is spreading a false story about the roof being the issue. The Secret Service director was told to stay quiet about it. If the post had been there, it could have prevented a dangerous situation.

The shooter was identified as a potential suspect, but by the time they were located, they were on the rooftop and able to fire at the former president. The Secret Service director was allegedly instructed by the administration and the DHS secretary to keep quiet or risk losing her job. One speaker has heard from the Secret Service director, but not publicly. Another speaker states they would fire the Secret Service director for not being visible and transparent with the American people, regardless of the story. They believe the handling of the situation by briefing only Milwaukee was poorly executed.

Local police were only assigned to traffic duties, not security, at an event. Despite Secret Service saying otherwise, the responsibility for a president's safety does not fall on them. When shootings occurred, local officers tried to help.

Whistleblowers claim the security plan for the former president called for law enforcement on the roof and around the building, but there was no one except the shooter on the roof and no one around the perimeter. The excuse given was that it was too hot that day. Whistleblowers also say the lead site agent was not trusted or highly regarded by other Secret Service agents and didn't know what she was doing. The speaker questions why these individuals were running security for a former president and current major party nominee, calling it inexplicable and stating that the lack of answers is making the situation worse.

We were at a party near the rally, listening to Trump speak when we noticed a man crawling on the roof nearby with a rifle. We pointed him out to the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. After a few minutes, shots rang out, and we were certain they came from the road. The Secret Service quickly responded and shot the man. They approached the roof to confirm he was dead. He was dressed in muted colors, and we could see the rifle clearly. It’s shocking that we could see him for so long without any security on the roof. There are many questions about the security response during the incident.

We saw a man with a rifle on a roof during a Trump rally. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but shots were fired before action was taken. The Secret Service shot and killed the man on the roof.

The speaker questions why snipers initially assigned to a second-story window with a clear view of the roof where the shooter stood and tried to kill President Trump were withdrawn before the shooting. The speaker emphasizes that these are basic questions the Secret Service should easily answer, especially given the seventeen days since the attack. The speaker expresses frustration that the response from the Secret Service has repeatedly been "we're looking into it," which they deem insufficient.

The Pennsylvania state police colonel testified that ESU officers left their post to search for a suspect, leaving the roof unguarded. However, another speaker contradicted this, stating that the officers stayed at their post but couldn't see the suspect's location. The vantage point didn't allow them to see where the suspect was shooting from. The discrepancy in accounts was deemed serious, as the officers' actions were under scrutiny.

I'm on the building where the sniper supposedly fired. The roof isn't steep; a 70-year-old man climbed it easily. If there were Secret Service or sniper teams here, he wouldn't have made it five feet up. The windows where the Secret Service was supposedly stationed on the second floor raise questions about their response time. Behind me, where the red roofs are, is where the president was speaking. There are many unanswered questions here, and we aim to conduct oversight to ensure this situation is addressed and prevented in the future.

Speaker 0 politely asks for the audience to lower their voices and thanks someone for their question. Speaker 1 mentions that federal authorities were not informed about certain information regarding the shooter. Speaker 0 asks for clarification on who "they" refers to. Speaker 1 explains that it was the local police who did not share the information. Speaker 0 states that the matter is under investigation and asks not to argue. Speaker 0 acknowledges the concern in the community but states that the facts are yet to be determined. Speaker 0 declines to make assumptions and ends the conversation.

The speaker discusses the shooter's close proximity to a fairground and the president's location. They question why law enforcement did not see the shooter on the low roof before the incident occurred, given the close quarters and visibility. The speaker expresses confusion over the lack of intervention before the shooting began.

I showed Tucker evidence that a police post was supposed to be at a certain location, but it wasn't there. The media is spreading a false story about the roof's pitch causing the absence. The Secret Service director was warned to stay quiet by the administration and DHS secretary. Negligence in checking police logs could have led to a dangerous situation.

We noticed a suspicious person, shared photos with snipers, but didn't receive a response. Secret Service didn't communicate with us before the shooting. Climbed onto the roof unsure of the situation, found the shooter's body. Despite efforts, we feel we failed that day as lives were lost and we could have done more to prevent it.