reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes someone is a "crazy person" who hates Trump and wants to be remembered in history for opposing him and helping the economy. When Trump was president and wanted to stimulate the economy, this person allegedly raised interest rates instead, acting contrary to Trump's wishes. The speaker indicates "we don't want Trump to be in the clean government."

Politicians need to understand that high inflation is caused by the federal government, not the private sector. Wealthy individuals often lack insight into the struggles of everyday people. Many are suffering, and it's crucial to listen to their concerns. Engaging in endless wars is not sustainable, and there should be a focus on peace. The divisive rhetoric from leaders only exacerbates the anger in the country. Instead of labeling half the population negatively, we should promote unity and the American dream. Politicians must learn economics to grasp the true causes of inflation, which stem from government actions, not private enterprise.

In this video, the speakers discuss the Federal Reserve and its role in the economy. They mention that the Federal Reserve provides money to banks, which then loan it to the government and collect interest on those loans. This process creates new money and leads to inflation. The speakers also talk about the need for audits of the Federal Reserve and express concerns about the potential impact on monetary policy. Additionally, they mention the boom-bust cycles in the economy and how banks benefit from them. Finally, one speaker raises concerns about the struggles faced by families and the need for jobs and affordable living expenses.

Speaker 0 says that on Friday the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas threatening a criminal indictment related to testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June about a multiyear project to renovate historic Federal Reserve office buildings. They emphasize respect for the rule of law and state that no one, not even the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. The speaker argues this unprecedented action should be understood in the broader context of administration threats and ongoing pressure, stating the threat is not about the June testimony or the renovation project, nor about Congress’s oversight role. The Fed, through testimony and other public disclosures, allegedly tried to keep Congress informed, and the speaker asserts those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges, according to the speaker, arises from the Fed setting interest rates based on what will serve the public, rather than following the President’s preferences. The core issue, the speaker says, is whether the Fed can continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions or whether monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation. The speaker notes service at the Fed under four administrations, both Republican and Democrat, asserting a record of carrying out duties without political fear or favor, focused on the mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Public service, the speaker adds, sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. Finally, the speaker commits to continuing to perform the job the Senate confirmed them to do with integrity and dedication to the American people, and thanks the audience.

To address inflation, we need to tackle massive deficit spending and government waste. If the economy grows faster than the money supply, meaning we stop government overspending and the output of useful goods and services exceeds the increase in money, we can eliminate inflation. High interest payments are due to the increasing national debt, with the government competing with private citizens to sell debt, driving up interest rates. Cutting back on the deficit leads to the elimination of inflation and lower interest rates. This would reduce mortgage, credit card, car, and student loan payments, making life more affordable and improving the overall standard of living for people.

The transcript presents a series of conspiracy claims about the Rothschild family, the Federal Reserve, and Jewish influence over global finance. - The Rothschild family is described as extraordinarily wealthy, with wealth estimates claiming “close to $500,000,000,000,000,” and as having hidden underground vaults, secret financial records never audited, and a public image that disguises a fortune that supposedly rivals a large share of global wealth. It is claimed they bought Reuters in the 1800s, which then bought the Associated Press, and that they “own controlling interest” in three major television networks, allowing them to avoid media attention. They allegedly owned and operated England’s Royal Mint and act as the gold agent for the Bank of England, directing it, with control over the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold are traded daily, generating millions weekly from transaction fees. They are said to fix the world price of gold daily, hoard trillions of dollars worth of gold bullion, and corner the world’s gold supply. They allegedly own controlling interest in Royal Dutch Shell and run phony charities and offshore banking services to hide wealth in Vatican-linked accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. A figure named Elbelein Rothschild is described as not harmless, with ancestors alleged to have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored mass murder and impoverishment. The wealth is claimed to be sufficient to feed, clothe, and shelter every person on earth. - The Rothschilds are described as the head of a “snake,” with a one-mile square area in London referred to as the city, cited as the headquarters of their banking dynasty, controlling money supplied through central banks of almost every nation. - A Jekyll Island meeting in November 1910 is claimed to involved seven of the world’s richest Jewish men establishing a central bank called the Federal Reserve Bank. Named participants include Nelson Aldrich, Frank Vanderlip, Henry Davison, Charles Norton, Benjamin Strong, Paul Warburg, and representatives of the Rothschild banking dynasty, with others like Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Astor purportedly opposing it. It is claimed these opposers died on the Titanic, and that opposition dissolved by April 1912. On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve Act was signed, creating a privately owned Federal Reserve System. A quoted remark attributed to Woodrow Wilson alleges, “I’m a most unhappy man. I’ve unwittingly ruined my country,” and a stereotype about government by a small number of dominant men rather than free opinion. - It is claimed the Federal Reserve System is private, not federal, has no reserves, is not decentralized, and that the adoption of a debt-based monetary system was accomplished. It is asserted that the current banking system (fractional reserve banking) allows privately owned banks to create money “out of thin air,” with money existing as numbers in a computer system, only about 3% in physical currency, and that control of the Fed enables domination over banks, corporations, money, and politicians. It is claimed the Fed system enslaves humanity to perpetual debt and that the elite who own the Fed seek to maintain a monopoly over credit. - A speaker questions the proper relationship between the Fed chairman and the U.S. president, noting the Federal Reserve’s independence. - A quotation attributed to a figure named Harold Grales Rosenthal claims that Jewish power has been created through manipulating the national monetary system, that the Fed is owned by Jews while appearing as a government institution, and asserts antisemitic stereotypes about Jews as parasites and producers being exploited by Jews.

It's time to end the Federal Reserve. Representative Thomas Massie from Kentucky has introduced the "End the Feds" bill, HR 8421, aiming to abolish the Federal Reserve Act. He believes that the Federal Reserve is responsible for crippling inflation, having created a trillion dollars during COVID to fund unprecedented deficit spending. This has devalued the dollar and led to high inflation, effectively acting as a hidden tax on Americans. The national debt has soared to $34 trillion due to continuous money printing. To support this initiative, contact your state representative and express your support for Massie's bill. Stay updated by following him on social media and sharing this message.

A principal economist working at the Federal Reserve, Harel Hizmo, discusses his role in writing speeches for Jerome Powell, the chairman of the board of governors. Hizmo reveals that the Federal Reserve deals with classified information and that Powell wants to be remembered as someone who held the line against Donald Trump. Hizmo also mentions that the Fed has shifted its focus to include equity issues, racial issues, and climate change. He suggests that conservatives may face discrimination depending on their views. Hizmo explains that Powell didn't want to create a recession during an election year and discusses the impact of Trump's presidency on the Fed's regulations. The video ends with a call for insiders to share information with the media.

Giving an update on the DOJ criminal investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Now, the American public is fed up with public monies that seem to go into a black hole, especially in DC, where no one is held accountable. One of the age old tools that all prosecutors have to investigate any crime, including cost overruns, is a grand jury subpoena. Today, however, in Washington, an activist judge has taken that tool away from us. By inserting himself and preventing the grand jury from even obtaining, let alone hearing evidence, he has neutered the grand jury's ability to investigate crime. As a result, Jerome Powell today is now bathed in immunity preventing my office from investigating the Federal Reserve. This is wrong and it is without legal authority. In June 2025, Jerome Powell testified before the Senate Banking Committee, making questionable statements that did not comport with publicly available documents. And that was regarding the atrocious cost overrun of more than $1,000,000,000 I didn't say million, I said billion, in renovations to his headquarters. This from the man who says that he is the steward of our public funds. In November, the United States Attorney's Office began an inquiry. Prosecutors from my office gathered information for months we served two grand jury subpoenas. On December 19, we sent an email to the Federal Reserve to have a conversation, a meeting, or even a phone meeting, or even a phone call to discuss our concerns. Again, we were ignored. We in fact asked to meet the first week in January. We were ignored. It was at that point that two grand jury subpoenas were issued to the Federal Reserve, not even to Jerome Powell. Again, no response, no compliance, but instead a Woe is Me video by Mr. Powell falsely claiming that he was being threatened with indictment. And claiming victim status, Powell proceeds to call his political friends in DC and around the world to gin up support for himself. All the while refusing to produce simple documents. Now enter local district court judge James own. I case. And the subpoenas, thereby prohibiting us from reviewing any records and precluding us from submitting records to the grand jury. That grand jury, of course, comprised of ordinary people. Ladies and gentlemen, no one is above the law.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell initially indicated that interest rates would remain high, but later suggested that rate cuts were being considered. This sudden change led some to speculate that it was politically motivated, aimed at helping Joe Biden's presidential campaign. However, there is a deeper concern that the US economy's underlying fundamentals are weak, forcing the Fed to scramble for solutions. The zero interest rate policy has fundamentally changed the world, allowing for increased debt despite low unemployment. This unsustainable debt-based economic scheme is causing the deficit to rise. Society and long-term economic cycles are undergoing radical transformations, as seen in changing attitudes towards environmentalism, women's rights, and political elections.

The Federal Reserve has significant power over the economy, but lacks scrutiny. During the pandemic, it printed money, bought government-backed securities, and provided large sums of money to favored industries, resulting in a $5 trillion increase in its balance sheet. A limited audit revealed that during the financial crisis, the Fed gave over $16 trillion to domestic and foreign banks. These actions, aimed at making the rich wealthier, have led to high inflation, which burdens American families. To address this, an amendment is proposed to require a full audit of the Fed within a year, promoting transparency and accountability to taxpayers. A yes vote is requested.

The speaker explains that the Federal Reserve is a private bank owned by private stockholders, not the government. They discuss how the Fed loans money to banks and the government, which must be paid back with interest. The speaker questions where the Fed gets its money and reveals that it is printed by the United States Mint. They argue that the Fed's control over printing money is unconstitutional and leads to the devaluation of the dollar. The speaker also mentions a secret meeting in 1910 where the plan for the Federal Reserve was devised. They criticize the creation of the IRS and how taxes are used to pay back the Fed's debts.

The speaker believes Trump is a "crazy person." They feel that someone wants to be remembered in history as holding the line against Trump. When Trump was president and wanted to stimulate the economy, this person allegedly raised interest rates and did the opposite of what Trump wanted. The speaker concludes that "we don't want Trump to be in the clean government."

Speaker 0 lays out a sequence of observations and interpretations regarding financial markets and political moves. They begin by noting a pattern: gold and silver prices had been moving up by record amounts, the dollar had fallen to a four-year low in the dollar index, and the dollar had even fallen to an all-time record low against the Swiss franc, while the bond market was starting to roll over. From this, the speaker infers that something unusual and potentially destabilizing was occurring in the financial landscape, and they suggest that this situation prompted a response from the administration. The speaker then posits that Scott Bessent, along with other people who are close to the president, communicated a message to the president indicating that there was a problem that needed attention. In the speaker’s view, the Trump administration recognized the need to act in order to stop the perceived slide or derail the momentum of the developing situation and to buy some time. The implication is that the administration deliberately sought to intervene in the markets in a way that would slow or modify the trajectory of events. Following this assessment, the speaker asserts that the administration coordinated with short sellers and with big banks to target silver, suggesting a conspiratorial collaboration aimed at affecting market dynamics. This is presented as part of a broader strategy to exert influence and to create the impression that actions were being taken to counter the market’s movement. A key element of the narrative is the announcement of Kevin Walsh as the new chair of the Federal Reserve. The speaker describes there being a coordinated public relations campaign around Walsh’s appointment, implying that the public portrayal of the move was designed to show that Trump had done something unexpected. The narrative further claims that the campaign depicted Walsh as an inflation hawk and suggested that he might advocate for rate hikes and perhaps even return to quantitative tightening. Crucially, the speaker asserts that Walsh was selected because he has marching orders to do exactly what Donald Trump wants him to do. The claim is that, if this were not the case, Walsh would not have been chosen for the job. The speaker contrasts this with any public portrayal of Walsh as independent or hawkish in a neutral sense, arguing that those portrayals are not genuine according to the speaker’s interpretation. In sum, the transcript presents a view that a set of market signals prompted a deliberate, coordinated intervention by the Trump administration, including collaboration with short sellers, the strategic targeting of silver, and the appointment of Kevin Walsh to the Fed as a means to implement a policy direction aligned with the president’s objectives.

Speaker 1 stated that Jerome Powell is too late and slow, and that he is not happy with him. Speaker 1 claims he has let Powell know this. Speaker 1 believes that if he wanted Powell out, Powell would be out of his position very fast.

Harrell Hizmo, a principal economist at the Federal Reserve, prepares speeches for Jerome Powell. He says his work is "all classified." Hizmo believes Powell wants to be remembered for "holding the line" against Trump and helping the economy. He claims Powell is responsive and has shifted the Fed to consider equity, racial issues, wealth inequality, and climate change. Hizmo says Powell raised interest rates against Trump's wishes to stimulate the economy. He believes Powell is slow-rolling solutions to avoid a recession during an election year, fearing people could lose their homes and jobs. Hizmo states that some people think conservatives are dumb and that the Federal Reserve might discriminate against them depending on how "out there" they are. He also says the Fed had to introduce new regulations to offset actions taken by Trump.

Powell: "no. I will not. The law says that, the president can't fire me." The discussion points to "a higher law, the supreme law of the land"—the "US constitution," which "never gave any authority to the federal government to create a monopoly central bank that can manipulate interest rates and counterfeit money." "Counterfeiting is a crime." "The issue is the existence of the Federal Reserve." Speaker 1 adds: "They're to continue to mess around with that, but your point is perfect," noting "arbitrary laws that they write that do not follow the rules of the constitution or natural law" and that "the constitutional restraint against, you know, a central bank, there's no authority for that, is one thing that they totally ignore." They call the Fed "a cartel of the biggest banks" with "a government privilege," and argue that "as long as the Fed does exist, we can't have a genuinely free society, free economic life." They warn, "if the central bank is permitted to permit money at will ... the value of the currency is going to go down and prices will go up." The goal is "sound money for freedom."

The speaker argues that central banks should not be given more power, asserting that the answer is a resounding no. They claim that the high inflation beginning in 2021 was created by central banks, regardless of any explanations about wars, and assert that the economics are clear. The speaker states they could forecast from May 2020 onwards that eighteen months later there would be significant inflation because the money creation was “massive off the charts.” They allege that central banks “imposed a fake pandemic,” referencing a conspiracy-like claim about a manufactured crisis. The speaker asserts that people such as Jeffrey Epstein are part of this narrative and that Epstein, in public records, was involved as early as 2017 in “setting up the scheme of this great pandemic for some investors to make a fortune,” naming Bill Gates as an example. The statement continues, claiming that “we can also make money injecting people with stuff and solve the problem” as discussed by Epstein and Bill Gates, and characterizes this as a matter of public record about how to “get rid of the poor people.” Finally, the speaker contends that this was used “at the same time to push digital ID.”

The speaker believes that the government has been lying about inflation for decades. They mention an article in the New York Times that claims inflation is declining, but groceries remain expensive. The speaker explains that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is used to measure inflation, but it can be manipulated by the government. The CPI now considers changes in the quality of goods and allows for substitutions, which can result in lower reported inflation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which calculates the CPI, operates with secrecy and does not make the raw data available to the public. The speaker questions the lack of transparency and suggests that inflation may be higher than reported.

Switzerland, Cambodia, Japan, Denmark, Thailand, Botswana, Barbados, Taiwan, Bulgaria, Cuba, Sweden, Morocco, Cargo Verde, South Korea, Algeria, Canada, Albania, Libya, Malaysia, China, New Zealand, Trinidad And Tobago, Czechia, Bolivia, Australia, Costa Rica, The Bahamas, Kuwait, Papua New Guinea, Bosnia, United Kingdom, and The UAE all have lower interest rates than the United States. The president sent a note to the Fed chair stating that he is too late and has cost the USA a fortune, and that the rate should be lowered by a lot. The president believes hundreds of billions of dollars are being lost and that there is no inflation, which he attributes to his policies.

Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, criticized federal spending, stating that the current path is unsustainable. This is significant because Powell has been supportive of Congress's spending habits. The US is facing massive deficits and increasing debt, which is draining the economy and posing a threat to the financial system. The Fed's role is not to manage the economy but to print money and deliver it to Wall Street and Congress through cheap debt. Powell's criticism is noteworthy as it shows concern about excessive printing. However, Congress continues its spending spree without any checks or balances. The media fails to address this issue, leaving most Americans unaware of the impending crisis.

The Federal Reserve's actions are worrisome. They've lost trillions by borrowing money at high rates (5.4% from banks, 5.3% from funds like Fidelity and Vanguard) to buy government bonds. This artificially inflates the government's perceived financial health, encouraging excessive borrowing when rates were low. This process diverts capital from the private sector, hindering business growth and job creation. Instead of the Fed holding massive balances, that money should be used by businesses for expansion and innovation. The Fed's actions are mirrored by other major central banks globally, exacerbating the problem. It's not money printing; it's expensive borrowing that harms the economy. Freeing up these funds would allow banks to lend to small businesses and stimulate economic growth.