reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The FDA, NIH, and CDC recommended vaccinating pregnant women at any time, leading to a rise in maternal mortality. A recent paper showed a concerning increase in maternal deaths in the US, erasing decades of progress in obstetrics. Pregnant women are dying with no mention of COVID or vaccines in the report. This alarming trend should be a cause for concern for everyone.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, but these findings were ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

Speaker 0 reports that fertility clinics have observed drastic reproductive issues linked to inoculation: “the sperm of inoculated men does not swim. The eggs of inoculated women do not grow into embryos,” with those conceptions showing “a huge amount of contamination with stuff that's non organic.” They reference a Pfizer safety study in the first New England Journal of Medicine (June 2021), stating that, “if you look at the raw data, it proves that eighty percent of the women who get the shot in this first and second trimester, basically zero to twenty weeks, have an eighty percent miscarriage rate.” The baseline miscarriage rate is described as one in six, and they claim it is now seven to eight times that amount. Doctor James Thorpe is cited: a “seventy nine percent increase in fetal malformations” and “unprecedented numbers of stillbirths,” alleging censorship by the mainstream media. The speaker mentions a publication titled My Cycle Story with many scientists, including Doctor Hooker, presenting a database of “over 6,000 women that came forward because their voices were being silenced.” They note about “20,000 women on Facebook” discussing menstrual experiences, including reports of severe bleeding, not mild symptoms, and that “90 year olds beginning bleeding again.” The speaker describes clots: women calling with clots passing for weeks. They reference “two VAERS cases of little girls, 18 old girls, who hemorrhaged and died,” within the My Cycle Story data. The database included “over 6,000 women,” and they looked at the baseline rate of decidual cast shedding (the uterus shedding its entire inside in one piece, looking like a plaster cast). They report that in their data, it was “like two sixty nine women” who reported this. They note that most of the original database consisted of women who hadn’t even had the shot, implying the phenomenon affects coagulation pathways in the body and is not limited to vaccinated individuals. The speaker emphasizes the impact on fertility and reproductive health, warning of the potential horror for young women who “realize they will never be able to get pregnant because they had that shot.”

After receiving trial documents, a Florida doctor noticed an 80% miscarriage rate in Pfizer recipients. Her practice delivers around 300 babies annually, with a 100% increase in miscarriages post-COVID vaccine rollout. She shared her data on doctor Jessica Rose's substack in 2022, highlighting the influence of big pharma on medical schools. This was discussed on American Thought Leaders with Janik Tellek.

The speaker claims that “the centerpiece of the Pfizer papers” is an intentional attack on human sexuality, especially women and babies. They assert that Pfizer “killed the babies” and “knew it,” “poisoned the breast milk” and “knew it,” “damaged the placentas” and “knew it,” and “lowered the sperm count” and “knew it.” They say the papers include a chart of the babies being injured and a chart of women’s menstrual cycles being disrupted. They further claim the papers concluded that “babies were dying in utero due to maternal exposure to the vaccine.” The speaker states that this document “went to Dr. Walensky,” and that Walensky then gave a press conference urging people to get a COVID vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy. The speaker describes the situation as “satanic on a massive level.” They also reference “Borla” and emphasize that, in their reading of the Pfizer papers, it is impossible to conclude otherwise regarding intent. The speaker points to “this 13 to 20% drop in live births,” and concludes that they “tried to kill us,” “tried to wipe us out,” and “tried to sterilize us.” They claim that many people died, that there will be “horrible struggles with fertility,” and that they survived while “the truth came out.”

Speaker 0 asked how many of his patients or pregnant women he knows experienced miscarriages after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Speaker 1 responded with observational data from his practice. He said that in fall of the previous year, about 60% of pregnant patients in his practice were vaccinated, which he noted is commensurate with Florida’s overall vaccination rate of about 60–65–70%. Most of his pregnant patients received three injections, with very few receiving four or more, and the majority received their injections in 2021 and early 2022. He referenced a Substack by Jessica Rose from November 2022 that presents his data pictorially, and noted that his data runs from January 2020 to November 2022. In 2020, he observed many newly registered obstetric patients (represented by blue bars for first-trimester new pregnancies). He stated there were the most deliveries, suggesting a lockdown-related effect. He then discussed miscarriage rates. He noted that standard textbooks and articles quote a normal miscarriage rate of 13–15%, but he has never seen that clinically. A 2020 study by Nairt et al. reported the actual first-trimester miscarriage rate as 5–6%, and he considers that even that to be somewhat high. He reported his own average miscarriage rate in 2020 as 4% month-to-month. He stated that his miscarriage rate from year to year increased: in 2021, the average month-to-month rate was 7–8%, with a peak in November that year, when a non-clinical staff member told him there had been eight miscarriages in a single month in a practice that delivers 20–25 patients, a “huge number.” In 2022, the average month-to-month rate rose to 15% (up to November). In December 2022, there were 41 newly registered patients, and 13 of them lost their babies, which is 25% for that month. In January and February 2023, the rate remained high, and only normalized around June, with a subsequent slight rise and fall by September. Regarding whether the miscarriages were associated with vaccination, he said it is hard to determine: he could tell that about 60% of his patients were vaccinated, but many new patients had not yet appeared in his practice, since he is the sole clinician who asks every patient about vaccination, brand, and timing, as well as prior COVID infection. He noted that asking a patient who miscarries if they received an injection could come across as accusatory, so obtaining complete data is challenging. He concluded with the observation that the information is difficult to ascertain precisely and that not wanting a patient to feel blamed complicates collecting definitive links between vaccination and miscarriage.

The speaker claims the Shimabukuro study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on 04/21/2021, misrepresented miscarriage rates, reporting 12.6% when raw data allegedly showed 82% in women vaccinated during the first trimester. The speaker alleges conflicts of interest and misrepresentations by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor in Chief Eric Rubin in publications intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. The speaker asserts that subsequent studies claiming vaccine safety during pregnancy are compromised by biased funding, institutional mandates, and threats to medical licenses. Pharmaceutical companies allegedly paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals between 2020 and 2022, corrupting the peer review process. Safety signals were allegedly ignored in at least six studies from CDC, FDA, and Pfizer. The speaker states their team published a study on 02/08/2025, identifying 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccines. They cite a study documenting the vaccine traversing the placenta and producing spike protein in the placenta and uterus, and animal studies revealing destruction of ovarian reserve. The speaker urges halting funding to organizations like ACOG and SMFM and ending promotional campaigns for mRNA therapies in pregnant women.

The speaker outlines a series of alarming claims regarding mRNA vaccination and female fertility. They state that in a study involving rats, mRNA-vaccinated subjects exhibited a 60% reduction in primordial (premortial) follicles. The speaker emphasizes that primordial follicles represent a finite resource with no regenerative capacity, noting that women are born with a limited number of these follicles. The implication drawn is that the mRNA shots can reach the ovaries and instruct the ovarian tissue to produce toxic spike protein. According to the speaker, the body's response to this production is to attack the spike protein, leading to tissue damage and destruction of eggs. The destruction of eggs is presented as irreversible, given that primordial follicles do not regenerate, which the speaker asserts has direct consequences for fertility. Further, the speaker cites human data indicating a 33% lower birth rate among vaccinated women, linking this observation to the ovarian damage described in the animal model. They combine these points to argue that a pattern of reduced reproductive capacity is occurring and that this pattern is supported by both the animal study and the human data referenced. The speaker portrays these findings as extraordinarily worrisome and asserts that regulators have failed to address the issue. They argue that regulatory inaction is contributing to what they describe as an ongoing decline in humanity’s fertility. The overarching message is a call for regulatory attention and intervention in response to what they characterize as significant risks to fertility associated with mRNA vaccination. In summary, the speaker claims: - Rats given mRNA vaccines showed a 60% reduction in primordial follicles. - Women are born with a finite, non-regenerating pool of these follicles. - mRNA vaccines purportedly reach the ovaries and cause production of toxic spike protein, provoking an immune attack that damages ovarian tissue and eggs. - This damage allegedly leads to a 33% lower birth rate in vaccinated women, as suggested by cited human data. - The combination of these factors is described as highly concerning and in need of regulatory action, warned against as contributing to a potential future decline in human fertility.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

The speaker discusses the risks of pregnancy and not giving birth to the child. Pfizer provided important data, revealing that out of 29 specific members in their study, 28 women did not have children. 23 lost their babies within the first 20 weeks, while the remaining 5 experienced stillbirth or fetal death. Only one child survived out of the 29. The speaker also mentions the number of viral particles in the mRNA vaccines, which is 40 trillion. They express concern about the potential harm to the immune system and urge people to stop taking the vaccines.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

Speaker claims COVID is a respiratory infection, but Pfizer documents show 'a three sixty degree obsessive focus on ruining human reproduction.' They say researchers studied 'ruining fallopian tubes, ruining ova, ruining placentas, ruining fetuses in utero, ruining the birth process, ruining lactation' and ask, 'Why is that?' They assert lipid nanoparticles 'traverse the placenta' and cause placental calcifications 'which prevent the baby from getting nutrients and oxygen.' They report babies born early because placentas cannot grow normally, and that 'placentas are flat.' They say lipid nanoparticles would go into the baby, 'degrading the Leydig cells and Sertoli cells of baby boys of vaccinated moms,' noting 'Sertoli cells and Leydig cells are the factories of masculinity.' An andrology report allegedly 'confirmed that the injection killed the ants and motility of sperm in men.' Pfizer allegedly warns not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women of childbearing age, 'two reliable forms of contraception.' They state 'two seventy women got pregnant in the study of vaccinated women' and 'two thirty four of them, the records of what happened to that pregnancy were lost,' and 'of the thirty six women who gave birth, over eighty percent of them lost their babies.'

Doctors administered untested gene therapy to infants, toddlers, and pregnant women, claiming it was safe. However, the mRNA jab was deemed the most dangerous medical product for pregnant individuals. Traditional medical principles were disregarded, including giving experimental drugs to pregnant patients and assuming any death or injury post-intervention was related. Regulatory authorities worldwide dismissed adverse events as unrelated until proven otherwise, leading to disastrous consequences.

The speaker discusses a New England Journal of Medicine study from April 21, 2021, and an accompanying op-ed by Eric Rubin, Stephen Morrissey, and Rochelle Walensky, alleging they made false and fear-mongering statements about the risks to pregnant women, unborn children, and newborns if they didn't get vaccinated. This was allegedly done despite evidence suggesting pregnancy reduced maternal mortality and data showing the COVID-19 vaccine was the deadliest and most injurious vaccine ever released. The speaker claims the study, authored by 21 federal employees including Tom Shimabukuro, was biased. Out of 827 pregnant women in the study, they highlight a claimed miscarriage rate of 12.6%, which they argue is abnormally high compared to the normal rate of 3% at a normal booking visit. They allege that 700 of the women received the vaccine in their third trimester, but were artificially placed in the first trimester data. This allegedly skewed the miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in the first trimester to 82%, which is the same miscarriage rate seen in the Pfizer post-market data.

The speaker asserts that the Pfizer documents reveal the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history and that the documents focus specifically on destroying reproduction. They claim that Pfizer knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles and that these nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They contend the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure to the vaccine, described as “maternal exposure quote unquote to the vaccine.” The speaker states that vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making the babies sick, citing charts showing thousands of babies vomiting, thousands with edema (swollen flesh), and thousands with convulsions. They claim one baby died of multi-organ system failure from nursing vaccinated moms. They further assert that, to this day, in places like the Netherlands and across Europe and the world, vaccinated moms are not being told they can risk their babies’ lives by nursing them. The speaker alleges Pfizer knew these risks and references a section of the Pfizer documents noting an over eighty percent spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. They further claim Pfizer knows there is something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses, because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing-age women and to use “two reliable forms of contraception.” They assert that the injection doesn’t stay at the injection site but travels throughout the body within forty-eight hours, accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and the liver, crossing the blood-brain barrier to cause brain-damage-type reactions, and accumulating in the ovaries. They claim it is damaging the hearts of minors and reference FOIA documents from the White House, noting a scramble in April 2021 to cover this up. The speaker concludes that the shots were propagated to parents during that summer and into the next year, advocating for vaccinating minors while knowing they were injuring or killing them. They describe the actions as ongoing dissemination and promotion of vaccination for minors despite the asserted harms.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

The speaker asserts the "golden rule of pregnancy" is to never use unproven drugs or vaccines, a rule they claim was broken during COVID. They allege that Pfizer's post-marketing analysis of approximately 29 pregnant mothers showed a 97% pregnancy loss. They claim real-world data from hospital systems indicates a 50% to 67% pregnancy loss rate when women are vaccinated during pregnancy, leading to obscene stillbirth numbers and early pregnancy losses. The speaker attributes these losses to the toxic spike protein from vaccines crossing the placenta and harming the fetus. They state that vaccinating pregnant women was a mistake based on lies and that it is now known to be unsafe, especially for mothers and their children.

Now that people are seeing the trial documents, we're finding out about bad outcomes, like the eighty percent miscarriage rate in the Pfizer trials. They were aware of this. I'm Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OBGYN. After the COVID vaccines rolled out in 2021, I saw disturbing trends in my patients. My miscarriage rate had doubled from the previous year. I tracked my data in real time and published my findings on Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack in 2022. A lot of medical schools get a large portion of their funding from big pharma. I'm Yaniv Kelek, and this is American Thought Leaders.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

According to the speaker, now that people are getting the documents from the trials, the miscarriage rate was eighty percent in the Pfizer trials, and they knew that. Obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. Kimberly Biss observed disturbing trends in her patients after the COVID-19 genetic vaccines rolled out in 2021. She noticed her miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by a hundred percent. She began tracking and comparing her data in real time and published her findings on doctor Jessica Rose's substack in 2022. The speaker also claims that a lot of medical schools, 50 to 60% of their money probably comes from big pharma.

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate in pregnant women. 236 out of 270 records were lost. Babies in utero were exposed to the vaccine, leading to deaths. Breast milk was poisoned by vaccine components, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns may have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Pfizer knew about this issue 2 years prior.

Experts, including the speaker, believe that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women based on extensive research. The vaccines have been proven safe and effective in the general population, without affecting fertility rates. They also provide protection against COVID-19 for pregnant women. The speaker, if pregnant, would definitely get vaccinated as the risks of the vaccine are much lower than the risks of the disease itself. Even children are eager to get vaccinated to regain their normal lives. However, another speaker raises concerns about fetal and chromosomal malformations, premature births, and respiratory issues after mRNA injections. They accuse pharmaceutical companies of hiding information about the deaths of two babies due to transplacental exposure to the vaccine. They call for attorney generals to investigate these claims. The Moderna documents are said to contain similar shocking information.

The speaker says that even for obstetrics and gynecology societies, vaccination during pregnancy has been pursued as a duty, but physicians do not know the actual facts. They reference the New England Journal of Medicine, a famous medical journal, where a study of a vaccine’s adverse outcomes claimed that the user rate was 12.6%. Based on that paper, the Sanpeshikawa (Sanbushikawa) Association reportedly promoted vaccination for pregnant women as well. In reality, the data were as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in late pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stages (first trimester). When restricting to the 127 people who were under 20 weeks, the usage rate was 82%. Therefore, the speaker argues that this data reveals how dangerous the vaccine is, and that the data were hidden and mixed with high-profile 700-person data to produce the 12.6% miscarriage rate that was published. This is presented as evidence of a situation where even in medical journals, information was handled to favor the other side due to money and other influences.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

The speaker reveals that a vaccine funded by the WHO was discovered to be a fertility regulating vaccine. It was used without women's knowledge in South America in 1993. The vaccine caused idiopathic infertility, irregular periods, failed pregnancies, threatened abortions, premature labor, and other complications. These findings suggest a sinister agenda behind the vaccine's use.