reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In a study of 325 autopsies, it was found that 73.9% of deaths were either directly caused by the COVID-19 vaccine or significantly contributed to by it. Most deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the vaccine, with cardiovascular causes being the main factor. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, who claim there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine. These autopsies provide undeniable proof that the vaccine is responsible for some deaths, challenging the government's stance. The study has gained significant attention on social media and editorial platforms.

My son loved hockey and got vaccinated despite his fear of needles. He experienced severe symptoms after the shot and passed away shortly after. The doctor failed to properly diagnose him. I want the truth about vaccine deaths and closure for my son. Another doctor confirmed that the vaccine caused his death. Many others have similar stories, and we need to address the issue of vaccine injuries.

Speaker 0 asked about a report and how concerning it is, questioning whether “10” is the real number. Speaker 1 said the main concern is that the report “dramatically understates the problem.” They argued that analyses rely on doctors and that it was difficult to obtain autopsies during the pandemic. Speaker 1 stated that medical professors did not want to know, resulting in very few autopsies. They said NIH, CDC, and FDA reviewed 96 autopsies of children and identified about 10 cases they considered possible or probable. Speaker 1 then pointed to VAERS, stating there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They said that of the 39,000 deaths, 24% occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. They acknowledged FDA officials say VAERS does not prove causation, but said that if someone was perfectly healthy and died on that day or within one or two days, they would assign blame. Speaker 1 also said there may be cases where people were already in bad health and vaccination “tipped them over,” with death ultimately caused by something else. Speaker 1’s “bigger revelation” was described as information they said was not covered by mainstream media. They stated that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks, head of CBR within FDA, was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS safety would hide and mask safety signals. Speaker 1 said that 26 days later, Marks ran a new algorithm that unmasked 49 cases of extreme masking and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. Speaker 1 said that in the next three months, similar data runs with the new algorithm showed more safety signals and more types of sudden death. They said the report described not “pin[ning] a badge” on doctor Anna Scharzman (identified as the dad of Speaker 1’s expert), ordering her to cease and desist, and continuing to use the algorithm the briefing warned would hide safety signals “to this day.” Speaker 1 said Peter Marks later went to work for Eli Lilly and claimed that the world is in denial. They stated they could not get the story broadcast or interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MS Now, or CNN, and said they challenged Jake Tapper, sending the report and requesting an additional appearance.

The speakers discuss a study of 325 autopsies of individuals who died shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. According to the speakers, this is the largest autopsy series of its kind. A rigorous review of the autopsies allegedly found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. This study is claimed to be a peer-reviewed paper that is going to be published. One speaker states that they are the senior author of this study. The speakers anticipate a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines in children, pregnant women, and adults. They urge politicians to acknowledge and address this issue.

The speaker suggests that the COVID-19 vaccine may be causing more harm than good. They claim to have conducted a study of over 300 autopsies, finding that 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. They also state that 100% of cardiac arrest and sudden deaths had no other explanation but the vaccine. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these findings, as death is usually attributed to known causes.

A 28-year-old man in good health died five days after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. His wife found him unresponsive, and an autopsy revealed his heart was unusually soft, resembling a melted state, indicating myocardialysis. The doctor who conducted the autopsy expressed surprise at the condition of the heart. This case raises serious concerns about the vaccine's safety, particularly in healthy individuals. The situation is viewed as a significant crisis in both the medical field and in terms of scientific integrity. It is argued that the vaccine should not have been widely distributed or approved for marketing at this stage.

Dr. McCulloch states that COVID vaccines, in some people, result in death, sometimes on the first day of the shot. He believes this should trigger a black box warning on the product immediately. He claims that the currently available COVID vaccine package inserts do not contain the word "death" as of today. Therefore, Americans are not fairly informed.

A person shares their findings on deaths related to COVID-19 vaccines in Massachusetts. They obtained 500,000 unredacted death certificates and found a 7-year-old girl who died from complications of COVID-19. They also mention another girl who died from a stroke after receiving the vaccine. The person claims that the vaccine caused these deaths, but the CDC did not code it as the cause. They mention several other cases of strokes and deaths related to the vaccine. They conclude by stating that over 4,000 people in Massachusetts have died from the vaccine.

A study on COVID vaccine autopsies was published in The Lancet, stating that 74% of deaths were caused by the vaccine. The study was removed within 24 hours, citing unsupported conclusions. The study reviewed 325 autopsies, with the cardiovascular system being the most affected. Most deaths occurred within a week of vaccination. The authors called for further investigation. The removal of the study raised concerns about censorship and the CDC's stance on vaccine-related deaths.

Speaker 0 asks about a report and how concerning it is, suggesting that if the reported figure is 10, there is a “real number” that could be higher. Speaker 1 says the main concern is that the analysis “dramatically understates the problem.” They describe the difficulty of getting autopsies during the pandemic and say medical professors didn’t want to perform them, resulting in very few autopsies. They state that NIH/CDC/FDA reviewed 96 pediatric autopsies and concluded about 10 were possible or probable. Speaker 1 then argues that safety signals were “screaming,” and points to VAERS. They claim there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They say 24% of the 39,000 deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. Speaker 1 also references the point that VAERS doesn’t prove causation, while stating that if a person who was “perfectly healthy” died that day or within one or two days, they would “be blaming” the jab. They add that in some cases people may have been in bad health already, with death tipped over by another cause. Speaker 1 says the “bigger revelation,” which they claim was unveiled three weeks ago and is “still not being covered by the mainstream media,” involves FDA’s VAERS algorithm. They state that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks (head of CBER/FDA’s division approving vaccines and surveilling post-approval safety) was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS would “hide and mask safety signals.” They say that 26 days later, a new algorithm unmasked safety signals, producing 49 cases of extreme masking revealed and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. They claim that similar data runs over the next three months showed more safety signals and more sudden death. Speaker 1 further claims that FDA did not “pin a badge” on Anna Scharzman, referred to as the father of their expert, and instead “shunned her off to the side,” ordered her to cease and desist, and decided to use the algorithm they had been warned would hide safety signals, which they say is still being used. Speaker 1 states that Peter Marks left for Eli Lilly and claims “the entire world” is in denial. They say they have been unable to broadcast the story or get interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, or CNN, and that they challenged Jake Tapper, who they say agreed to read the report but has not invited them back yet.

And do you have any signs to back up your your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we re reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death. The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First off, there's Hocher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.

After getting the shot at Shoppers, she texted me, then died 7 minutes later. I insisted the shot killed her healthy mom, but the coroner claimed it was natural causes without examining her. I knew they were lying.

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot. Over 50% of these deaths had a cardiovascular cause. According to the speaker, these findings contradict the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. The speaker claims this research represents the largest series of autopsies indicating patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's position.

It is claimed that autopsies should be performed on everyone who dies after receiving a vaccine. It is alleged that there is a refusal to perform autopsies. It is argued that without autopsies, it is impossible to determine the specific cause of death. It is claimed that autopsies used to be commonly performed on most people who died.

In a study of 325 autopsies, it was found that 73.9% of the cases showed that the COVID-19 vaccine either directly caused or significantly contributed to the deaths. Most of these deaths occurred within a week or two after receiving the vaccine, with cardiovascular causes being the main factor. This challenges the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, who claim there is no evidence linking the vaccine to deaths. These autopsies provide undeniable proof that the vaccine is indeed causing deaths. This study has gained significant attention on social media and other platforms, forcing the government to address this issue.

The image being highlighted is a set of 36 blacked-out documents, referred to as “kuro-nuri so-ryo” (blackened documents). Of these, eight-tenths are blacked out. The relatives who received these documents are introduced: a woman in her 40s living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, who is the wife of the deceased; she had heard that her husband was a tutor at a cram school. He died at home, and the police prohibited a full investigation, so she wanted to know the cause of death and went to Northern Hokkaido to see the autopsy results. The narrative then shifts to the sequence of events for a different case: a 42-year-old man who died six days after vaccination. The wife wanted to know the details of her husband’s death. The husband received the first Pfizer vaccine on October 15, 2021. Soon after the vaccination, he developed a reaction: arm pain, fever up to 38.5°C, and a fever that lasted about three days, during which his wife acknowledges the fever was present but notes he did not usually discuss symptoms beyond that. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and came down; the husband had collapsed, coughing up white foam, with blood in his mouth and difficulty breathing. He then fell into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Medical professionals were asked to comment on the cause of death. They stated that the exact cause is not clearly known; it could be the vaccine, but there is no evidence to confirm this, so they could not definitively say it was the vaccine. They described the death as an acute circulatory system disease and mentioned possibilities such as vascular issues, heart or blood vessel abnormalities, and conditions like myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or aneurysm, but could not specify. One doctor suggested that the death might be attributed to an acute circulatory system disease, while another indicated that the precise cause remains uncertain. The wife wanted the autopsy results from the police to understand why her husband died, and she expressed that she regrets not having had an autopsy performed. When asked about performing an autopsy after national guidelines advised against it, officials reportedly suggested that delaying the man’s return home would be problematic, and thus the autopsy was not performed. The speaker notes that in other cases they have covered, some relatives feel that an autopsy would have helped them understand the death, while others question whether an autopsy would have changed anything. The report concludes that the death is suspected to be due to an acute circulatory system disease, but the pathway to that conclusion remains unclear because much of the evidence is redacted. The speaker emphasizes that if autopsies had been pursued more actively, such cases in Sapporo might be less common.

The speaker claims that aligning deaths in the vaccine trial to intervention arms shows the vaccine was never life-saving. They allege that at the time of vaccine approval, there were more deaths in the vaccinated arm, but four deaths in the vaccinated arm within the data reporting period were not publicly announced. The speaker states that loved ones of two patients called the clinical site on the day of their death. They felt it was their ethical duty to inform the TGA and Ken Paxton about these hidden deaths. Publicly available data stated four deaths in the placebo arm and two in the vaccine arm. The speaker questions delays in reporting deaths, noting discrepancies in reporting rates between the vaccinated and placebo arms. The speaker wrote to Professor Tony Lawler of the TGA, who allegedly stated there were no hidden deaths and that no deaths in the vaccine arm were due to the vaccine. The speaker highlights that out of 38 total deaths in the six-month period (21 vaccinated, 17 placebo), only seven autopsies were done. Ten of the 21 deaths in the vaccinated arm were categorized as sudden adult death, with some individuals found dead shortly after vaccination.

Professor Lawler stated there were no breaches of good clinical practice and no hidden deaths in the Pfizer trial, also claiming that none of the deaths were attributed to the vaccine and the initial conclusions remain valid. In response, the speaker says they reanalyzed the data and found more deaths in the vaccinated arm (21) compared to the placebo arm (17). In the vaccinated arm, 10 deaths were categorized as sudden adult death or found dead, but only two had autopsies. One autopsy result is available and showed sudden cardiac death. The other is still pending. The speaker questions how it can be stated that deaths are not due to the vaccine when autopsy results are pending or not performed, especially in cases of sudden death. The speaker has repeatedly asked the TGA for the evidentiary basis for the statement that none of the deaths were due to the vaccine, but has not received a reply.

The speaker presents a set of dramatic pathological observations and a charged political critique. They show the myocardium of a man who died from unknown causes after the third vaccine injection, describing heart muscle as red with yellow islands identified as dead cells or scars. They claim that in a 77-year-old who had no prior heart history, the muscle was simply bedridden with scars, and that these scars were microscopic and would not have been seen unless the heart had been opened and examined. The speaker questions how the scars could have formed, asserting that the damp vaccine had been injected into the man’s blood, caused the vessels to become leaky, and allowed the vaccine to seep into the muscles. They describe the muscle tissue as red with islands of what they call “normal muscle” that were not normal, and refer to Michael Mertz as having found dead and dying heart muscle cells in these normal islands, specifically mentioning “numbers three and four.” They urge the audience to consult a publication that they claim is now available to everyone and describe it as “damning, so damning.” They challenge others to stop talking about the issue and to halt “this madness, this criminality.” They then name political and health authorities—“Biden,” the FDA, the CDC, and the WHO—and assert that these entities are killing millions and soon billions of people on the planet because they claim there is an effort to introduce mRNA vaccines for everything, listing measles, mumps, hepatitis, flu, and “you name it, you have it.” In sum, the transcript alleges that: - A man died after the third vaccine injection, with pathological cardiac findings described as red myocardium containing microscopic scars and islands of dead cells. - In a 77-year-old with no prior heart disease, the heart muscle supposedly carried microscopic scars and was bedridden, with the scars attributed to the vaccine entering the bloodstream and causing leaky vessels that allowed seepage into the muscles. - Michael Mertz is cited as having found dead and dying heart muscle cells within what appeared to be “normal” muscle tissue. - A publication is claimed to exist and be readily accessible, described as damning. - The speaker calls for stopping political and health authorities (Biden, FDA, CDC, WHO) and asserts that the introduction of mRNA vaccines for widespread use is leading toward mass and eventually billions of deaths.

The speaker discusses the importance of autopsy in understanding the immune response to COVID-19 and the potential complications of the disease. They highlight two cases of aortic dissection following COVID-19 vaccination and emphasize the need for further investigation through autopsies to determine the underlying mechanisms. The speaker argues that autopsies are crucial in identifying unusual immune responses and ensuring the safety of vaccines. They stress the importance of asking scientific questions and advocating for patients' well-being. The speaker concludes by expressing the need for more autopsy reports to be independently reviewed and understood.

Chris and I chose not to vaccinate, concerned about myocarditis. Our family faced tension over vaccination choices, especially after Rory's tragic incident. He got vaccinated and soon after reported discomfort. One night, he collapsed, and despite my efforts to reach him, he was gone. The health commissioner stated that the risks of the vaccine weren't clearly communicated, but it wasn't a breach of rights. Rory's death was linked to acute myocarditis from the vaccine. Many believe the vaccine is safe, and experts emphasize its effectiveness. However, there are concerns about the pressure to vaccinate, which some feel compromised their choices. Ultimately, the message remains that the vaccine is considered very safe.

Dr. McCulloch is asked to weigh in. Speaker 1 responds that he has presented at FDA advisory meetings and advised companies for decades on regulatory science. He states that when a product definitely results in death, and there are thousands of peer-reviewed papers on this, the COVID vaccines in some people sadly result in death—some on the very first day they take the shot. He argues that this must be a black box warning on the product immediately. He says he checked the package inserts for the currently available products, noting that the ones Senator Blumenthal wants to pursue, and what the Governor still wants to pursue, and what the FDA still wants administered, do not have the word “death” in the package insert. He asserts that Americans are not fairly informed. Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 doubts that the COVID injection caused some deaths, and asks for his view on the numbers listed on VAERS (thirty-seven thousand, six hundred seven, per the prompt) and whether he has any science to back up his opinion. Speaker 1 replies that the best data are autopsies. He references the largest autopsy series published to date and notes that he is the senior author. He says they examined deaths after vaccination, had an adjudication committee and methods of arbitration to decide whether the vaccine caused death, and that in these autopsy cases, seventy-three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. He mentions Holsher and colleagues, who are right behind him. Speaker 0 reiterates the FDA’s own laws, asking that this be included in the package insert, correct? Speaker 1 confirms, noting that in 2021 Dr. Carol Tocetta, working with the Daily Cloud, wrote about Peters’ marks in 2023 and asked, “where’s the black box warning? Where is it?”

The speaker discusses a review of 325 autopsies, which they claim is the largest autopsy series in the world, of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals who died shortly after vaccination. According to the speaker, this review found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. The speaker states that this information will be published in a peer-reviewed paper. The speaker anticipates a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines to children, pregnant women, and adults. The speaker urges politicians to "get ahead of this" issue now.

A study of 325 autopsies found that in 73.9% of cases, the COVID-19 vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to it. The deaths occurred within one to two weeks after the last shot, and in over 50% of cases, the single cause of death was cardiovascular. This contradicts the official narrative from the CDC and FDA, which maintains that there is no evidence linking deaths to the vaccine, except for a few acknowledged cases after the Janssen vaccine. According to the speaker, these autopsy results are incontrovertible evidence that patients died from the vaccine, challenging the government's stance. The findings have gained significant attention online and on social media.

The transcript centers on a set of 36 blackened documents, referred to as “海苔弁” (a term used for darkened papers or redacted files). The speaker notes that 8割 (about 80%) of the white areas are blacked out. The family involved is introduced: a 40-something woman living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, who is the wife of a man who taught at a cram school. He died after receiving a vaccine, and his death occurred at their home, after which the police prohibited autopsy. The wife wants to know the cause of death and asks to see the autopsy results from the northern region. The documents she received do not reveal anything conclusive. The narrative then moves to a specific case: a 42-year-old man who died six days after vaccination. The wife wants details about her husband. He received the first Pfizer vaccine on October 15, 2021. After vaccination, he experienced side effects, including arm pain and fever, which reached up to 38.5°C. The fever lasted about three days, and the wife confirms the fever occurred, but she notes her husband did not commonly discuss illness beyond that. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and went down to find her husband collapsed. He was coughing up white foam from his mouth and bleeding from the mouth, and he complained of difficulty breathing. He then suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Medical opinions on the cause of death are summarized: the doctor(s) say, “Details are unclear; it may be the vaccine, but it could be something else; there is no evidence to confirm the vaccine as the cause.” The police describe the condition as an acute circulatory system disease, and multiple doctors mentioned possibilities such as acute circulatory system disease, heart conditions, coronary events, arrhythmias, cardiac failure, and aneurysm, but a specific cause could not be confirmed. One doctor notes that while the autopsy would help clarify, the evidence does not definitively point to the vaccine as the cause. The documents include statements from a party labeled as “investigative or consent-possible opinions,” including autopsy-related viewpoints and “acute circulatory system disease suspected” remarks. The final conclusion in the documents states that the death is “presumed to be acute circulatory system disease,” but the path to that conclusion remains unclear due to the blacked-out or redacted portions of the materials. The wife expresses regret that autopsy was not performed, saying she now regrets not having an autopsy. She was advised that delaying the return home would be an issue, and thus the autopsy did not proceed. She has continued to worry about why her husband died, given that the exact cause remains unknown, and she suggests that more proactive autopsies could reduce such unresolved cases in the future. The transcript notes that there are multiple fatality cases studied, with some families wishing autopsies had been performed to understand why death occurred. The account ends with the author noting ongoing questions about whether autopsies are being actively pursued in similar cases.