reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Investigations into the family were obstructed, raising suspicions about the timing of pardons issued just before the end of the Biden administration. The pardons appear questionable, especially Fauci's, which is backdated to 2014, coinciding with the start of gain-of-function research. This connection raises doubts about the origins of COVID-19 and suggests further investigation is needed. The pardons for Milley, Cheney, and Kinzinger are also puzzling, and it's crucial to determine if they lobbied for these pardons or if any financial exchanges occurred, given the Biden family's history of potential bribery.

The speaker expresses disappointment that the existence of myocarditis was known very early on. They claim to have written to Fauci in 2020 and 2021 about lymphopenia and the failure to clear the virus, asserting that this failure was also known early on. The speaker states the perception of 95% efficacy was inaccurate and suggests there were perverse incentives at play, and now the consequences must be recognized. Another speaker then states that this is why Fauci needed a pardon.

Anthony Fauci has been accused of funding the Wuhan lab and engaging in a cover-up. Multiple government agencies are allegedly involved in hiding their support for the lab. Despite Congress declassifying information, there is still classified unclassified information being withheld. Emails have emerged showing Fauci's knowledge of gain of function and concerns about the virus's origin. He allegedly lied in hearings, which is a felony. It is claimed that Fauci bypassed the safety committee that should have reviewed the Wuhan funding. These revelations are expected to have serious consequences for Fauci. This is the fourth round of the COVID cover-up.

The speaker references a developing controversy surrounding Anthony Fauci, stating that there is “talk of Anthony Fauci being prosecuted as that may have been a auto pen pardon.” They note that “Trump just said they might revoke those pardons.” The speaker asserts that this issue should be on the front page news of every major news organization, arguing that, for the past four years, people experienced lockdowns whose consequences included shattered lives and lost jobs and livelihoods. They contend these losses occurred “based on now a verifiably highly flawed test,” emphasizing that “only fourteen percent represented true infection.” In light of these assertions, the speaker calls for accountability, insisting that there must be discussion about preventing a recurrence: “There should be accountability,” and “we have to start talking about this because this cannot happen again.” The overall message ties the alleged prosecutorial and pardon-revocation developments to broader social and economic harms believed to have stemmed from the lockdowns and the testing that supported them, urging media coverage and a public conversation about responsibility and safeguards moving forward.

Preemptive pardons are being discussed for individuals potentially targeted by Trump, including members of Congress and Anthony Fauci. Although these individuals haven't requested pardons, there is speculation about Fauci's risk due to allegations of lying to Congress, which could lead to felony charges. Evidence from his private emails supports these claims. Additionally, there are expectations that Biden may pardon his brother Hunter, who has a significant criminal history, and possibly himself. The precedent set by Hunter Biden's pardon, which covered all potential future accusations, raises the possibility of similar actions for Fauci and others.

The speaker discusses talk of Anthony Fauci being prosecuted, mention of an auto pen pardon, and Trump’s statement that those pardons might be revoked. The speaker asserts that this should be on the front page news of every major news organization. They reference the past four years and the lockdowns, stating that people’s lives were shattered, they lost their jobs, and they lost their livelihoods. This is linked to a claim that the foundation for these outcomes was a verifiably highly flawed test in which only fourteen percent represented true infection. The speaker calls for accountability and emphasizes that this cannot happen again, insisting that the issue must be discussed publicly.

Doctor Fauci was accused of failing in his leadership roles during the pandemic, allegedly covering up the lab leak theory and funding gain-of-function research. Testimonies revealed attempts to hide information, delete emails, and avoid transparency. The speaker criticized Fauci for prioritizing personal interests over public health, eroding trust in the public health system. The speaker vowed to seek accountability despite ongoing cover-up efforts.

On January 9, 2024, Anthony Fauci admitted that the 6-foot social distancing guideline was arbitrary. He previously claimed that masks were necessary, despite acknowledging they don't provide perfect protection. Fauci also asserted that COVID vaccines would prevent infection, which later proved inaccurate. Both political parties allowed Fauci to dictate pandemic responses, leading to significant consequences for schools, businesses, and the economy, resulting in the highest COVID death rate globally. Critics of Fauci faced censorship and were labeled conspiracy theorists. Recently, Fauci acknowledged that the lab leak theory is a possibility. The speaker calls for a new political path, urging donations to their campaign to break free from the two-party system and restore democracy and moral authority in the U.S.

Speaker 0 contends that a large number of pardons were issued by the auto pen on the final day of the Biden presidency, and asserts there is no record showing that Joe Biden participated in the authorization of those pardons. The speaker claims that these pardons include notable examples such as those for Dr. Anthony Fauci, members of the Biden family, Adam Schiff, the January 6 committee, and an extensive list that the speaker describes as continuing at length. The core assertion is that every one of these pardons was signed with the auto pen and there is no evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in the decision-making process behind them. According to the speaker, the absence of Biden’s involvement in the decision-making is a key element of the argument, and the implication is that this absence of direct participation should be recognized in legal terms. The speaker further states that these pardons could be declared null and void by the Department of Justice. The underlying claim is that there is a basis for such a nullification rooted in the way the pardons were issued, specifically the use of the auto pen and the lack of documented presidential involvement. The speaker also asserts that the ongoing investigation will produce evidence that will support the DOJ’s decision to void the pardons. In this framing, the investigation’s forthcoming findings are presented as capable of reinforcing the claim that the pardons were improperly issued or improperly authorized due to the absence of direct presidential action. The overall narrative presented is one of procedural challenge to the pardons, anchored in the asserted method of issuance (the auto pen) and the supposed lack of Biden’s participation in the process. The speaker emphasizes a sequence in which the pardons, if deemed void, would be reversed or nullified by official action from the Department of Justice, with future investigative evidence expected to validate that outcome in court.

People are losing security clearances and government contracts, but this is not enough. Dr. Fauci is responsible for the death of millions, and merely losing his job is insufficient. USAID is funding a radical Marxist agenda globally, and business loans are being given to children. Social Security and Medicare payments are being sent overseas and to dead people, including 50-year-olds. No one has been held accountable for any of this.

Doctor Fauci was criticized for alleged failures and cover-ups during the pandemic, including funding gain-of-function research and avoiding transparency. Accusations of deleting emails to evade FOIA requests were made, questioning his leadership and integrity. The speaker expressed disappointment and called for accountability.

The speaker notes increased talk of prosecuting Anthony Fauci, suggesting it could involve an auto pen pardon, and asserts that Trump said those pardons might be revoked. They argue this should be front-page news everywhere, referencing the past four years of lockdowns in which people lost their jobs and livelihoods. They claim these outcomes were based on a verifiably highly flawed test, which they state represented only fourteen percent true infection. The speaker calls for accountability and says we must start talking about this because it cannot happen again.

We are witnessing a devastating loss of lives globally, with 6.5 million deaths. There are concerns about Anthony Fauci's alleged lies to Congress, while Steve Bannon faces contempt charges for not attending a hearing. We should focus on those responsible for this pandemic, including negligent individuals within the US government, the Chinese Communist Party, Fauci, and Peter Daszak. Criminal charges should be pursued. It is important to investigate the origins of the virus, as Daszak's company collaborated with the Chinese Communist Party in Wuhan, China.

Anthony Fauci's involvement in funding the Wuhan lab is being covered up by multiple government agencies. Despite Congress declassifying information, I am still being denied access to classified and unclassified information. However, evidence shows that Fauci lied in hearings and knew about the lab's activities. Emails reveal his concerns about the manipulated virus and its origins in Wuhan. He dismissed these concerns for the past three years. Additionally, Fauci bypassed the safety committee that should have reviewed the funding, which is a significant revelation. Ultimately, this could lead to the downfall of Anthony Fauci.

"Senator: 'We discovered is that Anthony Fauci was destroying federal records. He was encouraging other people to destroy federal records. That is a crime.' He testified to the house a year ago and said he wasn't doing that. 'That's a crime to perjure himself.' 'We will bring him back. I've asked him to come and testify this fall. If he doesn't come voluntarily, we will subpoena him.' 'The question is, is he immune because of the pardon? I think that that needs to be challenged in court.' 'I have encouraged the Trump administration that they should prosecute this case and challenge the auto pen. I don't think the auto pen is sufficient.' 'There were so many pardons that I'm not sure Biden was aware of all the people he did pardon.' 'There is not a direct link from the person running the auto pen to the president. The person that was running the auto pen never spoke with the president.' 'And I think a president's signature on something so as important as legislation or a pardon is absolutely required.'" "Susan Monarez will testify before the senate HELP committee tomorrow. This will be her first appearance since being ousted from the role. She will be joined by Deb Aury, a former chief medical officer and deputy director who was one of four CDC officials who resigned after Monarez was ousted." "The chair with the president of Moderna ... I asked him about the expectation that he'll be getting a lot less revenue from the vaccine for COVID perhaps this time around. The scientific evidence shows that the risks of taking the COVID vaccine for children exceeds the benefits, and the scientific evidence is abundant on this. There's a study out of Israel that showed that about six to eight kids 20 that are healthy will get an inflammation of the heart that is very dangerous, and that risk exceeds the benefits of a vaccine. Every kid at six months needs to get a COVID vaccination, and that defies the scientific evidence and shows me that she's not objective. It's the same with the hepatitis B vaccine. Unless the mom has hepatitis B vaccine, disease, there is no indication for the vaccine at birth, and we need to readdress that."

In the early pandemic, 2020–2021, eighty six percent of PCR-confirmed COVID cases were not real infections. The speaker asserts that all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, and all of those policies that destroyed livelihoods and the economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. A study is described that compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks, noting that the antibody test indicates whether you got antibodies to COVID. The speaker states that only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It is claimed that it may even be up to ninety percent weren't real infections. The speaker concludes that this fraud is confirmed and calls for accountability for all the people who lost their jobs and were forced to take injections based on this fear campaign, which was based on this false test.

Speaker 1 says that throughout the Biden administration he sought records about decision-making and why the U.S. funded Wuhan, China research, including why evidence about the virus origin being from a lab accident was being suppressed, but “we got nothing.” He says the Biden administration “stiff-armed” him by preventing access to virtually any documents. He says many of the findings during the Biden administration came from Freedom of Information Act requests by people outside government and from court actions forcing disclosure. He says that after the new election, he received promises from Secretary Kennedy and others that documents would be revealed. He says it took about six months, with resistance he attributes not to Secretary Kennedy but to “minders” around him. He says that after finally receiving documents, they have been reviewed for about a month. Speaker 1 states that in communications between Anthony Fauci and others, including Francis Collins, Fauci is depicted telling others to read materials, then delete them, and that he allegedly instructed them to delete “this material” after reading. Speaker 1 says deleting emails and discussions about government business is illegal for someone in the executive branch. He adds that Fauci testified he did not do that, and says this creates “two crimes”: destroying federal records and a prior sworn statement that he wouldn’t do it. Speaker 1 identifies a “big question” involving what he calls an “auto pen pardon” and says it will have to be challenged. He says there are thousands of auto pen pardons and raises whether President Biden was aware. He says they interviewed the person running the auto pen, who said they never met the president, and that the person said they did not discuss it directly but heard about it from higher-ups who allegedly talked to the president. Speaker 1 says this provides “a lot to go on” and describes it as a chance for the issue to get into court and for the Department of Justice to fight it out. Speaker 1 says he has invited Anthony Fauci involuntarily; if accepted, they will bring him in, and if not accepted, they will subpoena him. Speaker 0 asks whether the alleged wrongdoing falls under the auto pen time frame, noting that in some earlier auto pen matters there were specific time frames. Speaker 1 responds that the “umbrella” was “a decade,” described as leading up to the end of Biden’s term, and says this raises questions about whether a pardon can cover crimes not alleged at the time, whether it can be “all inclusive,” and whether a pardon can be upheld if it doesn’t specify the crime. Speaker 1 contrasts this with how pardons are typically specific to an accused or trial-ready crime. Speaker 0 asks about specific consequences, including prison time, regarding destroying federal records. Speaker 1 says lying to Congress is the biggest issue, that it can be five years in prison as a felony, and that destroying records adds to the crime and is against the law. He then ties this to contemporaneous emails, asserting that while Fauci said publicly he had no idea the virus came from a lab and that it couldn’t have been gain-of-function, privately he was “very worried” about the lab because he knew it did gain-of-function research. Speaker 1 also says gain-of-function research was funded by the United States government with Anthony Fauci’s approval, and claims Fauci’s pandemic guidance about origins and about cloth masks was contradictory to privately discussed concerns, including that Speaker 1 says cloth masks do not prevent transmission.

Fauci should be in prison for mishandling the pandemic. He caused countries in Africa to have no COVID deaths, while shutting down our economy and schools, leading to a lost generation's education. This also resulted in the largest wealth transfer ever. Additionally, a million people died.

President Biden is considering pardoning Dr. Anthony Fauci. During a congressional hearing, Senator Paul questioned Fauci about his May 11th statement regarding NIH funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Fauci firmly stated he has never lied to Congress and does not retract his statement. Senator Paul accused Fauci of being responsible for the pandemic, which he claims resulted in millions of deaths and significant financial costs. He argued that Fauci's funding of gain-of-function research contributed to the virus's transmissibility in humans. Fauci countered that while some conspiracy theories are false, many hold truth, and suggested that it is Senator Paul who is misleading the public.

Anthony Fauci's actions have raised serious concerns, as many believe he put people at risk without their consent. The research linked to the pandemic has resulted in immense loss, with estimates of 20 million deaths and a staggering economic cost of $25 trillion. There are suspicions that Fauci would rather promote falsehoods than address these issues openly.

Millions dead, no arrests made. Anthony Fauci compared to J. Edgar Hoover for authoritarian tendencies. Fauci under constant security, receiving large sums of money during pandemic. Conflict of interest with vaccine manufacturers. Accusations of lying to congress. Concerns about double standards and potential chaos in the country. Ideology over skin color may lead to trouble.