reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Zoological viruses are being put in vaccines, specifically in the cell lines. These viruses have been present for a long time but are often overlooked in papers. The speaker suggests that this is a race and gender-specific attack, as certain groups are targeted. The goal is to change our DNA and establish a one-world order. The vaccines contain various viruses, including those found in polio vaccines. The speaker claims that those who are already immune will die from the shots due to antibody-dependent enhancement. The speaker advises against taking any vaccines, including the Pfizer vaccine, as they believe all vaccines are synthetic poisons. They claim to have evidence that the Omicron variant was present in humans in 2000. The ultimate objective is to ensure everyone is injected because other aspects of the environment, such as food and particulates, also pose a risk.

Speaker says, "it's a festering wound for people" and, "we cannot sweep it under the rug." They urge action, noting, "the new administration to step up and do something" because "the next you know, they have 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline." They warn, "33 of those are self amplifying, which is just really terrifying." They ask, "What does that mean? Meaning, like, they're designed to continue to replicate indefinitely." They add, "I mean, already the ones we have, we don't have an off switch, and this is like no off switch on steroids." They claim, "They have them in Japan and India and The EU already." They conclude, "They're the one that I think is in the pipeline in The US is for the h one n one."

The USDA approved self-amplifying mRNA injections for rabies and other diseases in cats and dogs. These injections are authorized, widely available for online purchase, and administered by veterinarians. The speaker claims that these injections can possibly shed onto humans. The platform, Nobivac NXT developed by Merck, is available for purchase online. According to the speaker, if pets receive Nobivac NXT, they might shed self-amplifying RNA or antigens onto owners through bodily fluids. The speaker asserts that this was not tested and was authorized regardless. The effects are currently unknown.

The speaker argues that genetic vaccines are totally unacceptable and defines the introduction of transgenes into the human body as gene therapy, questioning how this can be considered acceptable practice for creating vaccines. They assert that encapsulating messenger RNA in nanoparticles and administering it leads to off-target effects, with the effects starting from the ovaries to the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow. They emphasize that the biggest problem is going to the bone marrow and the reproductive organs like the ovaries, and then every possible organ. Regarding spike proteins, the speaker states that spike proteins are still detected in the rash after more than a year, which they interpret as evidence that messenger RNA is producing spike proteins. They contend that there is no way for a year-old spike protein to remain in the rash and be detected. Personal choices are also mentioned: they did not choose to get vaccinated because they think it was a foolish decision from the beginning. They have not even opted for the flu shot because they consider it an unwise choice.

The mRNA in vaccines can replicate, including the replication engine, leading to potential spread from person to person. Concerns exist about the inability to stop this replication, with unknown consequences for humanity. The spike protein in these vaccines can be toxic, affecting various tissues. Deployment of this technology in vaccines for humans is already happening, with over 4,000 people injected in Japan.

Self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) is being fast-tracked in the US after approval in Japan and Europe. SaRNA is similar to mRNA but replicates itself like a virus. Concerns are raised about its biodistribution and persistence, suggesting it could act as an STD. A white paper calls for a halt on saRNA vaccine deployment until comprehensive safety studies address contagious risks. It is argued that Moderna and Pfizer shots already shed and act as STDs, transmitting spike protein infections. SaRNA is designed to replicate and remain strong, potentially causing a contagious cancer-like disease. COVID shots may contain cancer-causing viruses like SV40, possibly with SV40 promoters to enhance their effectiveness. mRNA degrades over time, but saRNA is designed to make more of itself. There are ways to detox from mRNA, but not a self-replicator. Ultramethylene Blue is promoted for cell health, available at the Alex Jones store.

The FDA is fast tracking self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine platforms, a technology similar to COVID-era mRNA injections, potentially creating transmissible biological agents. Arcturus Therapeutics received FDA fast track designation for its saRNA vaccine candidate for pandemic influenza A virus H5N1, funded by BARDA and the Gates Foundation. Unlike traditional mRNA, saRNA replicates within cells, increasing toxicity, extending persistence, and raising transmissibility concerns. Attorney Tom Renz expresses alarm, stating clinical trials are dangerous and saRNA vaccines could mutate and become transmissible. Yale studies show mRNA persisting in the system for over 700 days post-vaccination, raising concerns about saRNA lasting indefinitely. Renz cites potential SV40 contamination and recombination with wild-type viruses as risks. There are three mechanisms by which saRNA could become transmissible: recombination, contamination, and hyper-stability. Renz criticizes AI's biased assessment of vaccine safety, noting the need to argue extensively with AI systems to reveal potential issues. He warns against AI-driven personalized cancer drugs without long-term safety tests.

Many people are experiencing adverse events and deaths after receiving mRNA injections. These injections are part of ongoing clinical trials, with more deaths reported in 2021 than in 30 years of vaccine trials. The injections are causing serious health issues, including heart problems that can lead to death within months. This situation is the largest experiment in human history, affecting not only adults but also children and pregnant women. It is crucial to stop these trials to prevent further harm.

A new study indicates mRNA injections induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease. Comparing gene profiles of mRNA-injured individuals to pre-COVID samples revealed thousands of dysregulated gene expressions linked to mitochondrial failure, suppressed cancer suppression genes, and immune dysregulation. Molecular chaos may result in cardiovascular, neurological, and carcinogenic issues, possibly due to genomic integration of DNA plasmids. A separate study showed mRNA boosters trigger dangerous immune and blood abnormalities, including increased blood clotting and immune suppression, within 48 hours in healthy young adults. Additionally, pets are being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors via Merck's Nobivac NXT, exposing pet owners to shedding of self-amplifying RNA and toxic antigens. This could potentially cause long-term genetic dysfunction in humans, with the possibility of the synthetic particle recombining with wild viruses. Individuals should ask vets about RNA or mRNA injections for pets and refuse mRNA injections for themselves.

The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase. And so veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets. If you look up Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck. You will find it online, and you can even buy it. It's possible if their dogs or cats receive the Nobivac NXT self self amplifying RNA particles. It's possible they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids. And so, none of this was tested by the way. They just authorized it anyways because they don't care.

The speaker clarifies they are injured by an mRNA therapeutic, not a vaccine, and highlights issues with lipid nanoparticles and synthetic mRNA, which can persist for hundreds of days. They claim that instructing cells to produce a protein that presents on the cell surface can trigger autoimmune disorders. The speaker states that the spike protein itself is biologically active, causing cells to grow and divide inappropriately, and was known to damage the placenta and lungs. They assert they knew early on that the shot didn't stay in the arm. They cite 2005 research showing the SARS-CoV-1 spike protein alone could harm animals. The speaker references 2015 gain-of-function research at UNC, NIH, and Wuhan labs, where a more lethal and transmissible SARS virus was created. A traditional vaccine attempt for this virus caused harm and lethality in animals, with pathology slides showing similar vascular lung damage seen with SARS-CoV-2. The speaker concludes that "they" knew about these risks but still rolled out the vaccine, profiting from it while falsely claiming it was safe and effective.

Self amplifying mRNA vaccine, which got fast track FDA approval a few months ago for the h five n one influenza. "That's even worse, quote, self replicating. We know Pfizer admits that their COVID shot is self replicating, thus sheds. This is officially sheds." "But now, when these self amplifying mRNA vaccines shed, they are shedding machinery that if you take it into your body, will start producing more mRNA." "There are women who miscarried when they were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna vaccine." "Pfizer told their officials that they had to report in the trial if any pregnant woman was exposed to anyone who was vaccinated." So shedding was a problem. So many people, like, didn't take it, but their spouse did. They got sick.

More than five years into the COVID-19 “disaster,” a paper published by Holzsher and colleagues in *Science, Public Health Policy and the Law* makes a broad call to remove all COVID-19 vaccines from the market. The paper cites international groups making that call, including lawmakers, and summarizes peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts concluding that risks far outweigh benefits. In the last few weeks, the US CDC dropped its universal recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination across all groups, and the transcript describes public health agencies as “quietly backing away” from COVID-19 vaccination. The group presenting these points is unified in calling for all vaccines to be removed from the market, with particular emphasis on messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. They call for a moratorium on the entire platform, including Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, and also including the Moderna respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. The transcript states that mRNA vaccines have “no ability to shut off production of the antibody.”

Speaker 0: They argue that because the vaccine is classified as such, they don’t have to worry about being sued. They claim immunity from liability is dependent on there being no fraud, and there clearly was fraud. Speaker 1: They say there is fraud. They note that immunity from liability depends on fraud, and in light of that, it matters. They explain that there was fraud. Speaker 0: Expresses surprise and asks for caveats about fraud. Acknowledges there were caveats. Speaker 1: Confirms there is fraud and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0: Asks how fraud is defined, noting that drugs were sold with multiple studies and only one was good. Speaker 1: Responds with a point about safety testing for the mRNA vaccines. States that the insufficient safety testing was done before release, and that the product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids. There is massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter from simian virus 40. The point is that safety testing for one drug was completed, but people were injected with something different that had other components that were not tested, which is described as fraudulent. Speaker 0: Requests an explanation of the SV40 issue for the audience. Speaker 1: Describes production techniques used to generate the product. Explains that a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, was used to produce the product in vats, with bacteria performing the production, later coated in lipid nanoparticle. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for DNA contamination, with limits that cannot be exceeded. In this case, the problem isn’t only poor quality control but that there was a more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. Consequently, leftover material in vials injected into people contained DNA contamination across the board. Kevin McKernan tested vials, finding DNA contamination in the samples. Speaker 1: Explains that the DNA left over includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is known to be carcinogenic. Since this promoter is left in the vials from injections given to people, it challenges the claim that the mRNA shots could not integrate into the genome. While acknowledging that there are cellular processes such as reverse transcription, the speaker asserts that even the claim of “no DNA” is false because there is DNA in the vials, specifically DNA with the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. The speaker concludes that this appears to be fraud: injecting a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was conducted with a product produced by a different process. Speaker 0: Reiterates the conclusion: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was done with something produced by a different process.

Speaker 0: Extremely dangerous self amplifying replicon mRNA injections are currently being deployed for humans and animals across the globe. A few days ago, The UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics self amplifying COVID nineteen injection for adults over 18. Previously, the European Union approved the same Arcturus Therapeutics replicon injection for adults. So it's in The EU. It's in The UK. Japan approved it in 2023. So it's being injected into Japanese citizens as well as India. India has approved these replicon injections as well. And so it is being rolled out across the globe and here in The US is very worrisome. The USDA approved the self amplifying mRNA particle injections for our dogs and cats. This is Novavac NXT by Merck. And so that's actively being injected into our, our pets and probably shedding onto human owners across The United States as well in The US. Our FDA fast tracked an h five n one bird flu replicon injection trial, and we have to remember just how dangerous these are. So not only can they likely shed this replicating genetic material can shed onto other humans or from our pets to humans to the human owners, but they can also recombine with wild viruses and and create these chimeric mutants. But what's most important is this Arcturus Therapeutics injection being approved everywhere in the in the clinical trials for them. Eighty five percent suffered systemic adverse events, fifteen percent required medical attention. And then a recent study in Uganda, it induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety three percent of the recipients. They suffered from thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia. So their immune systems were being degraded, and they were suffering inter increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. And eighty five percent of them were vomiting, had high fevers, and felt absolutely terrible. So this self amplifying assault on humanity needs to come to an end. We have to pull these off of the market and ban them for human use.

The speaker claims that "The USDA last year approved self amplifying mRNA injections for our cats and our dogs for rabies and a few other things. And these are authorized and they're widely available for online purchase." They say "veterinarians across the country are currently injecting self amplifying mRNA into our pets." They warn that "This can probably shut on to humans and this this has to be stopped" and ask, "Has it started yet?" "Yes." They cite "Nobivac Nex NXT, it's the platform developed by Merck" and that "you will find it online, and you can even buy it." They claim it is "possible... they are either shedding the self amplifying RNA or the antigen products that the dogs or cats are now producing onto the owners through bodily fluids." They add that "none of this was tested" and "they just authorized it anyways because they don't care," and that "it's completely unknown really at this point."

Many people are dying and experiencing adverse effects after receiving mRNA injections for COVID-19. These injections are part of ongoing clinical trials, with more deaths reported in 2021 than in the past 30 years of vaccine trials. The injections bypassed traditional trial phases and are causing serious health issues, including heart problems and organ failure. The speaker warns that everyone who receives an mRNA injection will die within 3 to 5 years, emphasizing the need for honesty and awareness about the risks involved.

The speaker believes mRNA shots are a "festering wound" impacting everyone that cannot be ignored. The speaker urges the new administration to address the issue, citing 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline, 33 of which are self-amplifying. Self-amplifying means they are designed to replicate indefinitely, which the speaker finds "terrifying" because current mRNA shots already lack an "off switch." The speaker claims these self-amplifying shots are already in use in Japan, India, and the EU. The speaker believes the one in the US pipeline is for H1N1, so it may not be used unless there is an issue, but they are still experimenting with it.

The conversation centers on concerns about self-replicating mRNA (replicon) technology. The speaker argues that, given media coverage in 2024 about side effects of regular mRNA and reports of deaths in Japan, the government should immediately halt self-replicating mRNA. They reference a Substack article titled "Japan's plan to destroy the world," claiming replicon technology is extraordinarily dangerous—“beyond nuclear weapons.” The speaker describes a replicon as “the nuclear weapon of biology,” comparing it to a device that can copy itself and set a timer to explode years later (one year, ten years, fifty years). They emphasize that a replicon has the power to copy itself and to steal genes from other species, calling it “omnipotent” and “the omnipotent virus.” The doctor (referred to as Doctor Nagasaki) is pressed for comment, with the speaker noting that more copies of a replicon in the environment increase the likelihood of producing a deadly variant that can spread with minimal symptoms. They explain, from a natural selection perspective, that the evolutionary pressure on a replicon is to cause as few symptoms as possible to allow the host to continue normal daily activities, thereby maximizing transmission. The discussion also includes a brief mention of monitoring a chat discussion, indicating engagement with the audience.

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.

The discussion centers on pets being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors. The USDA quietly approved Merck's self-amplifying RNA shots called Novavac NXT for cats and dogs with no real safety testing. It says it gives a small dose of RNA particles delivered in the Novavac NXT vaccine. RNA copies exponentially in the cells, and the copies are transcripted into large amounts of the desired antigen. The antigen stimulates a more robust humular and cellular immune response. All sounds good in theory. However, these injections may shed messenger RNA and synthetic antigens to human owners through breath, saliva, or fluids may cause long term genetic damage similar to that seen in humans may recombine with wild viruses creating dangerous new pathogens. This rollout puts both pets and their owners into an uncontrolled genetic experiment without consent. “So says Nicholas Holcher, Miles per hour. So masters in public health. We don't know. Nobody tested it. Nobody did any studies. We don't have long term studies. We don't have short term studies. We just don't know. I'm a little scared. I really don't want to be a part of this.” And by the way, they're actually talking about spraying messenger RNA on our crops. How are we affecting our I feel like this is the everybody remember the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. I think I had to read it in high school. Was one of those required readings. Or what was the other book? 1984? Like, I feel like we're living in this dystopian universe where we just experiment with all these genetic things and we just throw it into the environment and throw it into our pets and throw it into people, and we don't know what the outcome is until we see. Are we all gonna go the way the dinosaurs? I don't know. Now I really sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are we all gonna like, is somebody gonna come along in a few thousand years and find fossil remains and try to figure out why we all died? I don't know. It's fine. It's fine. It's just a little nervous.” One speaker says they homestead: they raise their own chickens. They’re not treated with chemicals. Their dogs and cats don't get vaccinated with things that might shed into the environment, and they’re growing all their own organic fruits and vegetables. “Yep, I'm I'm I'm going that way. Y'all y'all do what you need to do. It's a little scary. I don't recommend that particular vaccine for your dogs. I I guess that's the bottom line. I don't know. Be careful what you eat.”

MRNA vaccines were hailed as medical breakthroughs in the fight against COVID. Now the US Department of Health and Human Services is slashing a half billion dollars in government funding from mRNA vaccine development. The current vaccines are not infection blocking. When new variants come up, you lose protection, and they have very short duration. There was never a vaccine made with mRNA. Lipid nanoparticles go everywhere in the body, to the brain, to the bone marrow, to the liver, to the spleen, most importantly to the reproductive organs. I regret it every single day that I walked into my local pharmacy to get that shot in my arm. The spike protein directly causes blood clotting and is found in the middle of large blood clots. This vaccine, the mRNA vaccine, has probably saved about three million lives.

Speaker asserts that extremely dangerous self-amplifying replicon mRNA injections are currently being deployed for humans and animals worldwide. A few days ago, the UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics’ self-amplifying COVID-19 injection for adults over 18, and previously the European Union approved the same replicon injection for adults, so it is in the EU and the UK. Japan approved it in 2023, and India has approved these replicon injections as well, indicating rollout across the globe. In the United States, it is claimed that the USDA approved the self-amplifying mRNA particle injections for dogs and cats, specifically Novavax NXT by Merck, suggesting active injection into pets and potential shedding onto human owners in the US. The speaker states that the FDA fast-tracked an H5N1 bird flu replicon injection trial, raising concern given the alleged dangers of these products. The speaker emphasizes the potential for shedding of replicating genetic material from humans or from pets to humans, and the possibility that these replicating constructs could recombine with wild viruses to create chimeric mutants. They highlight a high rate of adverse events associated with the Arcturus Therapeutics injection, claiming that eighty-five percent suffered systemic adverse events and fifteen percent required medical attention. A recent study in Uganda is cited, alleged to have induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety-three percent of recipients, including thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia, with immune systems degraded and increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. The report also claims that eighty-five percent experienced vomiting and high fevers, and felt absolutely terrible. The speaker concludes that this self-amplifying assault on humanity needs to end, calling for these injections to be pulled from the market and banned for human use.

Nicholas Holcher, an epidemiologist and foundation administrator at the McCullough Foundation, appears on the WiderWake Media Podcast to discuss what he calls harms from the mRNA COVID vaccines and to critique mainstream approaches to the pandemic and public health policy. - Vaccine definitions and mRNA technology - Pre-2000 definition: a vaccine is an injectable or oral product that introduces a killed part of a virus or an inactivated form to the body so that encountering a wild-type version would not infect or would cause a less severe illness. - He asserts that mRNA injections are not vaccines: they are a gene transfer platform using modified messenger RNA with long persistence in the body (via N1-methylpseudouridine), delivered in lipid nanoparticles. He claims these bubbles distribute systemically, including to the brain, heart, bone marrow, and reproductive system, and that they instruct cells to produce a spike protein, effectively turning organs into “toxic spike protein production factories.” He says this leads to autoimmune attack on those tissues and contributes to adverse events, including myocarditis, strokes, immune destruction, and “turbo cancers.” - History and purpose of mRNA in vaccines - According to Holcher, work on this technology existed for decades but animals testing showed high mortality or sterilization in ferrets and mice, preventing approval except under a declared global emergency. He contends the COVID-19 crisis enabled emergency use authorization across Western countries, with ulterior aims to inject the globe with mRNA technology. - Global impact and uptake - He estimates about 70% of the global population received at least one COVID-19 injection (mRNA or viral vector). He notes Eastern countries used non-mRNA platforms (e.g., AstraZeneca/J&J in some places; Sinovac elsewhere) but that uptake in the West was high. - Harms and evidence - Excess deaths: cites a study by Dennis Brancourt et al. estimating around 17 million deaths worldwide as a result of COVID injections (as of September 2023); he claims US deaths could be in the hundreds of thousands to millions. - Turbo cancers: cites multiple studies in 2023 showing increased risk of seven cancer types (colorectal, bladder, breast, thyroid, prostate, etc.) in vaccinated groups; cites a major cancer journal, OncoTarget, reporting hundreds of turbo cancer cases across 27 countries, with Pfizer contributing most cases. Holcher also mentions his own group’s work with Neo7 Bioscience documenting genomic integration of vaccine-derived mRNA in a stage IV bladder cancer patient (31-year-old woman) with a segment of mRNA found in circulating tumor DNA on chromosome 19; another study reported thousands of dysregulated genes in post-vaccine cancers, including p53, KRAS, and BRCA. - Definition of turbo cancer: per Merrick et al., rapid, aggressive tumor progression with sudden onset and early metastasis, often in younger individuals, and resistant to treatment. - Fertility, pregnancy, and autism - Fertility: cites studies suggesting fertility impacts, including Karaman et al. finding depletion of primordial follicles in rats after mRNA vaccination; Manichi et al. reporting 33% lower conception rates in vaccinated women in Denmark; a study indicating a ~20% drop in sperm concentration and motility with no recovery over five months. - Autism: asserts a large body of evidence linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders, citing a 136-study review with 107 studies finding positive associations between vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, attributed to toxicity and immune system disruption, particularly in children with high vaccine exposure and reduced detox capacity (CYP450 impairment). - Other topics tied to vaccines and public response - The COVID-19 period and vaccine skepticism: claims the pandemic catalyzed a large anti-vaccine movement because people were compelled to take an experimental gene therapy product. - Sam Altman and gene editing: discusses Altman’s Preventive venture with the aim to reduce heritable diseases via in utero gene editing but warns of the path to designer babies and the potential for harm in early-iteration edits, citing prior CRISPR experiments on human embryos that produced deformed offspring or nonviable results. - AI, workers, and future society: predicts two-tier society with implanted or enhanced individuals and a replacement of human labor by robots and AI systems; discusses military and surveillance ambitions in gene editing and AI augmentation. - Mental health and digital life: references a randomized trial showing that turning off mobile Internet improved depression scores and well-being to an extent comparable to or greater than antidepressants. - World Health Organization (WHO): notes the US has pulled out of the WHO, arguing this is good for the US but potentially harmful for others still in the organization; expresses concerns about the pandemic treaty and ongoing global health governance, including vaccine passport-style surveillance. - FDA and public health policy: acknowledges some shifts (e.g., cutting doses from the childhood schedule) but argues the FDA remains compromised and too aligned with vaccine industry interests; criticizes the removal of a potential black box warning for vaccines and calls for more accountability. - Resources and contact - Holcher invites listeners to follow him on X (Twitter) at @nichulsher and to read their work on focalpoints.com and through McCullough’s network. Note: The transcript presents Holcher’s claims and interpretations about vaccines, turbo cancers, autism, fertility, and policy changes. The summary reproduces these points without endorsement or evaluation.

Speaker 0 says they found “information like this,” such as vaccine insert paper, with “nothing printed on it,” which they call disheartening and disgusting. They add that it “just keeps happening” and claim the CDC redacts “every single word” of a 148-page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. Speaker 0 says they asked someone to print the study, and that the entire 148 pages are redacted. They ask what a study does if “there’s nothing there,” and they ask what might have been there that required redaction. Speaker 1 says they are “witnessing an active cover up” involving “a colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States, the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved in a cover up, and that similar cover ups are occurring in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each company that puts out a product has an obligation to produce “ninety days of safety monitoring” after the product comes out, describing it as a regulatory dossier. They claim that if someone has a problem and reports it to a company like Pfizer, Pfizer must report, write down what happened, collate it into a report, and make it publicly available. Speaker 1 says that when the ninety days elapsed for Pfizer’s first vaccine approved on 12/10/2020, Pfizer “didn’t produce a report.” They add that people asked what was happening with the vaccine, and Pfizer allegedly would not disclose what happened, leading to a court case. Speaker 1 says the lawyer for the FDA stepped in to say they did not want to release Pfizer’s dossier for fifty-five years. Speaker 1 then says that after the plaintiff pushed, the Pfizer dossier “slowly” came out. They claim Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty-three deaths with their product within ninety days of release, and they say people called Pfizer in desperation watching family members die after taking the vaccine. Speaker 1 also claims Pfizer recorded “over twelve hundred” new adverse events and refers to “doctor Boden” discussing problems they say they have been grappling with. They conclude by claiming the FDA worked to cover this up and should have been regulating the company with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about novel vaccines, described by Speaker 1 as a genetic transfer technology platform and as the first time human beings were injected with foreign genetic material in world history, after which “they were getting it full on.” Speaker 1 ends by saying “Two thirds of the world’s population took”