reSee.it - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

Let's examine the contents of vaccines, particularly thimerosal, which is highly toxic and can cause serious health issues, including damage to the kidneys, respiratory system, and nervous system. It is also linked to reproductive and developmental toxicity, raising concerns about autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Thimerosal is a common preservative in vaccines, notably in the influenza vaccine, which is recommended annually for pregnant women, infants, and children. It's important to note that thimerosal is not added at the end of the manufacturing process; vaccines must be specifically produced to be thimerosal-free.

Speaker 0 suggests giving a child who hasn't received any immunizations before six different injections at once. Speaker 1 confirms that a six-month-old would receive DTaP, polio, and Hep B vaccines. They discuss the use of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines to make them more effective. Speaker 1 asks about the form of aluminum used in vaccines, and Speaker 0 mentions that ingested aluminum is different from injected aluminum. They discuss the safety of injected aluminum and its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Speaker 1 asks about antigens bound to aluminum and their role in creating antibodies. They also mention the presence of animal and human parts in vaccines. Speaker 0 is unsure about the specific details. They discuss the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccine production and the presence of cellular debris in vaccines. Speaker 0 relies on CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for vaccine safety. They consider family history factors, such as immune suppression, when determining vaccine recommendations. They clarify the type of polio vaccine used in the United States.

The childhood vaccine schedule is being questioned due to safety concerns, with calls for a moratorium on vaccines by the World Council For Health. Multiple vaccines given together may contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders and other health issues. Studies suggest that children who receive no vaccines have better outcomes. The rise in autism rates is alarming, with immune system dysregulation possibly linked to vaccines. Many parents are opting for a natural approach.

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

In 1985, millennials received a few vaccines. Today, children may receive up to 70 shots by age 18, including 27 before age 2, and up to 6 shots in one visit. The speaker asks if these shots are producing healthier kids, and claims the data says no. The speaker suggests that asking questions about the vaccine schedule is discouraged. Some parents who question the schedule may be reported to Child Protection Services or dismissed from their pediatrician's office. The speaker asserts that parents are being held hostage and did not sign up to co-parent with the government.

Speaker 0 suggests that a child who hasn't received any immunizations will have to endure six injections at once. Speaker 1 confirms that a six-month-old would receive DTaP, polio, and Hep B vaccines. Speaker 0 mentions that the type of Hep B vaccine depends on previous sessions. The same applies to a two-and-a-half-year-old. Speaker 1 questions why aluminum adjuvants are used in vaccines, to which Speaker 0 replies that they make the vaccine more effective. Speaker 1 asks about the form of aluminum and its effects, but Speaker 0 is unsure. They discuss the quantity of ingested and injected aluminum, but Speaker 0 believes the amount in vaccines is safe. Speaker 1 questions the ability of aluminum to cross the blood-brain barrier, but Speaker 0 is unaware. They also discuss antigens, macrophages, and vaccine ingredients, but Speaker 0 lacks specific knowledge. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 asking about family history factors and the type of polio vaccine used in the US. Speaker 0 provides some clarification.

Dr. Menares and an interlocutor debate the science behind pediatric COVID vaccination and routine immunizations, focusing on transmission, hospitalization, and risk. - The interlocutor asks whether the COVID vaccine prevents transmission. Speaker 1 answer: the vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are infected, and with reduced viral load, there is reduced transmission. The interlocutor reframes, insisting that the vaccine does not prevent transmission and notes decreasing effectiveness over time, citing Omicron data showing around 16% reduction when there is a reduction. - On hospitalization for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 asserts the vaccine does not reduce hospitalization for 18-year-olds; statistics are inconclusive due to small numbers of hospitalizations in that age group (approximately 76 million people aged 18 in the country, with 183 deaths and a few thousand hospitalizations in 2020–2021; numbers have since dropped). The argument emphasizes a need to discuss the issue. - On death for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 says the vaccine does not reduce the death rate; claims there is no statistical evidence that it reduces deaths. Speaker 1 responds with a more cautious stance: “It can,” but Speaker 0 counters, calling that an insufficient answer. - The discussion references the vaccine approval process and ongoing debates in vaccine committees. The interlocutor states that when the vaccine was approved for six months and older, the discussion acknowledged no proof of reduction in hospitalization or death. The argument asserts that the justification for vaccination is based on antibody generation rather than clear hospitalization/death data. The interlocutor contends that immunology measurements (antibody production) do not necessarily justify vaccination frequency. - The core debate centers on what the science supports for vaccinating six-month-olds and the benefits versus risks. The interlocutor argues there is no hospitalization or death benefit for vaccination in this age group, and notes a known risk of myocarditis in younger populations, estimated somewhere between six and ten per ten thousand, which the interlocutor claims is greater than the risk of hospitalization or death being measurable. - The exchange then shifts to changing the childhood vaccine schedule, particularly the hepatitis B vaccine given to newborns when the mother is not hepatitis B positive. The interlocutor asks for the medical or scientific reason to give a hepatitis B vaccine to a newborn with an uninfected mother, arguing that the discussion should focus on whether to change the schedule rather than declaring all vaccines as good or bad. - Speaker 1 says they agreed with considering the science and would not pre-commit to approving all ACIP recommendations without the science. Speaker 0 disagrees, asserting their position that the debate should center on the medical rationale for these specific vaccines and schedules, not on a blanket endorsement of vaccines. - Throughout, the dialogue emphasizes examining the medical reasons and evidence for specific vaccines and schedules, rather than broad generalizations about vaccines.

The speaker asks if there has been a study comparing the health outcomes of children following the CDC vaccination schedule and those who are unvaccinated. The other speaker says they are not aware of such a study and suggests it may be considered bad malpractice not to vaccinate a child. They discuss the possibility of a retrospective study using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, but note the need to control for confounders. The speaker presents an exhibit showing higher rates of health conditions in vaccinated children and suggests the need for larger studies to confirm or refute these findings. The other speaker agrees.

Hepatitis B is contracted through sexual activity and IV drug use. The speaker believes babies do not need the hepatitis B vaccine. The hepatitis B vaccine contains 250 micrograms of aluminum. The speaker states that after Thimerosal was removed from vaccines, the hepatitis B vaccine was moved from being given to teenagers to newborns. The speaker claims the amount of aluminum in the vaccine is five times the adult daily maximum.

We analyzed all patients in my practice, no cherry-picking. Stratified by vaccines, 500 had 0, 3,700+ had some. Results showed more vaccines correlated with worse outcomes: infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, anemia. Data is powerful. Access to this info would have changed my choices for my daughter. Every parent deserves all information for informed decisions. Translation: We examined all patients in the practice without bias. Results showed a correlation between more vaccines and negative outcomes. Access to this data would have influenced my decisions for my daughter. All parents should have access to complete information for informed choices.

Pediatricians recommend getting both the valent and neococcal vaccines within the first three months of a baby's life. However, there are concerns about potential neurological damage and permanent effects. The incidence of these issues is not clear, as reactions are often not recognized or attributed to something else. Some children have experienced serious problems, including autism, which some believe is correlated with vaccines. However, the scientific community has dismissed this correlation. Vaccines have been crucial in eradicating diseases like polio, and without them, these diseases could resurface. The safety and effectiveness of vaccines are supported by numerous studies, although some claim they can cause tumors and other health issues.

Parents are reportedly having difficulty finding pediatricians who will see their children if they deviate from the CDC's vaccine schedule. Many parents are now questioning what is best for their children, with most wanting some vaccines but preferring not to administer multiple vaccines in one visit. In some areas, like Pinellas County, practices often don't entertain deviations from the CDC schedule. Some parents pay out-of-pocket or travel far to find doctors who respect their preferences. One senator shared a story of a family member who travels to accommodate her vaccine preferences. Senator Davis referenced the Hippocratic oath, emphasizing respecting and caring for the patient and their preferences. Parents have a right to make choices for their children as part of the patient-physician relationship, rather than having their preferences disregarded.

The discussion centers on concerns about the safety of pediatric vaccines, the governing framework for vaccination and related notifications, and how schools and child-care settings handle cases where vaccination is incomplete. Key points raised by Speaker 0 (in Japanese) include: - The number and variety of pediatric vaccines have been increasing, with regular schedules reaching up to about 30 doses from birth. - Some vaccines include additives such as thiomersal (mercury-containing) and, in the case of influenza vaccines given after six months, thiomersal and aluminum compounds, causing anxiety about brain development and cancer risk. - Thiomersal is described as an organomercury compound that biodegrades to ethylmercury; its linkage to neurodevelopmental disorders has been asserted in materials from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). The materials indicate thiomersal and other additives (e.g., aluminum compounds) can be associated with concerns about cancer risk and memory impairment. The presenter cites materials labeled as current vaccine formulations like “Beugen” (B型肝炎ワクチン) containing thiomersal and organic silver derivatives, and notes concerns about aluminum compounds. - The speaker emphasizes that even with explanations from experts that trace amounts are unlikely to have measurable effects, caregivers remain cautious, influencing decisions about vaccinating their children. - There is a claim that disease risk reduction and broader environmental exposure concerns (e.g., artificial sweeteners, nicotine residues, colorants) contribute to vaccine hesitancy, especially given declining birth rates yet rising incidences of developmental disorders, dementia, or behavior-related conditions. - The speaker asks for the audience’s attention to the confusion surrounding vaccines and their additives, seeking to understand why some guardians opt not to vaccinate. Key organizational questions and clarifications provided by Speaker 1: - Under the Public Health Vaccination Act, local governments issue vaccination recommendations and encourage vaccination, including sending vaccination advisories that specify the timing and method. The notices concern vaccines such as the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), human papillomavirus (HPV), and Japanese encephalitis vaccines. The advisory notices are not mandatory, but vaccination is strongly encouraged. - When a guardian declines vaccination, it does not constitute abuse or neglect according to the law; preventive services and enforcement do not classify non-vaccination as neglect. Speaker 3 and Speaker 4 address practical and ethical concerns in child-care and education contexts: - In child-care facilities, there is no legal right to label a guardian as neglect simply for non-vaccination, though vaccination status is recorded in health forms. They stress the goal of preventing punitive treatment of guardians and promoting fair, informed medical care for children. - Questions are raised about whether vaccination histories influence admission or screening processes for child-care and school enrollment. The response indicates vaccination status is not a disqualifying factor for admission, and the health information form includes vaccination history; non-vaccinated children should not be disadvantaged in enrollment. - It is acknowledged that some guardians and teachers may hold misconceptions about vaccines, including concerns about toxins. The discussion calls for improved information sharing among health services, childcare, and education officials to reduce misinformation and support informed decisions. Speaker 2 (Takena Kazuko, Head of Childcare Family Division) and Speaker 4 (Ministry or Education official) respond to concerns about information sharing and the role of staff training: - They emphasize the distinction between compulsory vaccination guidance and voluntary advisories, reiterating that withholding vaccination is not automatically considered neglect. - They agree on the need to prevent punitive attitudes toward guardians, to inform teachers and childcare staff about how to communicate vaccine information, and to ensure consistent understanding across health, childcare, and education sectors. - A request is made to improve public awareness so that vaccination decisions are respected and differences in opinion are honored. Overall, the transcript details regulatory mechanisms for vaccination recommendations, the non-punitive stance toward non-vaccination in guardians, and the need for better information sharing and respectful dialogue among public health, childcare providers, and schools to address vaccine hesitancy without resorting to neglect determinations.

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines; by 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker claims there is a rise in diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which they rarely saw as a child, suggesting this generation is damaged by these diseases.

We couldn't find any prelicensing safety trials for the 72 vaccines doses that are recommended for American children. Unlike other medications, vaccines were exempt from conducting safety trials that compare health outcomes between a placebo group and a vaccine group. This lack of safety trials is concerning considering the widespread use of these vaccines.

The childhood vaccine schedule is under scrutiny, with the World Council For Health calling for a moratorium on childhood vaccines due to safety concerns. Vaccines given in multiple rounds may contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders like ADHD, autism, and seizures. Studies suggest that children who receive no vaccines have better outcomes.

After 1989, the U.S. administers twice as many vaccines as other Western countries. Parents should educate themselves on vaccine choices, questioning the necessity of certain shots like the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. There is concern that public health officials may not always prioritize individuals' best interests. The speaker questions why doctors wouldn't want to learn more about life-saving vaccines, suggesting financial ties between pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions influence vaccine promotion. Advocating for children's well-being may clash with the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry.

- There's no proof unvaccinated children start epidemics. Some practitioners claim unvaccinated children are healthier. - Some believe vaccine dangers are becoming clearer, questioning the assumptions of protection and preventing spread. - Breast milk is claimed as sufficient vaccination. - Some vaccines contain egg protein, gelatin from pigs, and human albumin, which could be problematic if the individual is unhealthy or develops antibodies. - Some vaccines contain MRC-5 human diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue. - Human DNA in vaccines is typically fragmented. - Thimerosal, a toxic substance containing mercury, is in some vaccines and can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity. - Some medical professionals were unaware that RhoGAM contained thimerosal or that thimerosal meant mercury. - Injecting aluminum into babies has never been tested for safety. - Mercury, formaldehyde, and antifreeze are claimed to be in vaccines. - These substances allegedly go to the brain, causing encephalopathy. - Over $3.5 billion has been paid in damages to children injured by vaccines. - A doctor describes a large reaction to a vaccine in a child, likely due to aluminum. - A mother shares her son's story of developing hives, joint swelling, fever, seizures, and autism after vaccinations; the vaccine court awarded $55,000. - Some medical professionals were unable to speak out against vaccines due to conflict of interest. - Some believe autism and vaccines are linked, citing a personal experience.

The speaker criticizes the CDC's recommendation of giving newborns vaccines containing aluminum, which exceeds safe levels. They mention the lack of studies on the combined effects of the 28 vaccines given to babies. There has been no official study by the CDC, FDA, or NIH comparing the cumulative effects of these vaccines to unvaccinated children.

The childhood vaccine schedule is being questioned due to the increasing number of vaccines given at once. The World Council For Health has called for a moratorium on childhood vaccines, citing safety concerns like neuropsychiatric disorders and immune system dysregulation. Studies show that children who receive no vaccines have better outcomes. The rate of autism has risen to 1 in 36, with many parents opting for natural immunity. The epidemic of autism is described as a tsunami.

Doctors report receiving minimal training on vaccines during their medical education. They were taught that vaccines are safe, effective, and have saved millions of lives, with emphasis on adhering to the vaccination schedule. Doctors say they did not learn the specific components of vaccines and assumed they contained saline water and bits of viruses. Without independent investigation, doctors presume vaccines are beneficial and essential for all children to receive on schedule. Since doctors may lack in-depth knowledge about vaccines due to limited training, parents should be trusted and listened to.

In 1985, newborns received only a few vaccines, but today, children follow a schedule that includes up to 70 shots by age 18, with 27 given before age 2 and sometimes 6 in one visit. Despite this increase, data shows no improvement in children's health outcomes. Parents who question the vaccine schedule often face repercussions, such as being reported to child protection services or dismissed from their pediatrician's office. This raises concerns about parental autonomy in healthcare decisions, leading to a feeling of being trapped in a system that limits their choices. Many parents express a desire for independence from government influence in their children's healthcare.

The discussion centers on pediatric vaccination, concerns about vaccine additives, and the policies around notifying and handling families who choose not to vaccinate. Key points raised about vaccines and additives - The number and type of pediatric vaccines have increased over the years, with regular vaccination schedules extending up to 30 doses from birth. Some vaccines, such as certain hepatitis B vaccines, the 3-valuent (3-in-1) vaccine, and post-6-month optional influenza vaccines, contain thimerosal (mercury-containing preservative) and/or other additives that provoke worry about brain impact or cancer risk. - Thimerosal is discussed as an organomercury compound that decomposes to ethyl silver in the body; it is described as having been linked to developmental disorders in the 1990s, with references to documents from Materials Supplemental 1 and 3, and to B-type hepatitis vaccines (e.g., a product branded as Beemgen) containing thimerosal and organo-silver components. - The discussion notes aluminum compounds in some vaccines (with two types in the quadrivalent types and in the cervical cancer vaccine) and mentions concerns about aging-related memory impairment (Alzheimer’s risks) associated with aluminum compounds. - Influenza vaccines, including those supplied post-6 months, are described as containing both thimerosal and chloromethyl sulfone-like additives (referred to as chelators/a set). The quadri- and other mixed vaccines are noted to include thimerosal and aluminum compounds; the cervical cancer vaccine is noted to contain aluminum compounds as well as thymus-specified adjuvants. - There is a broader perspective linking neurotoxins in vaccines to concerns about developmental disorders (ADHD, autism spectrum, learning disorders, emotional instability) and general caution about late-emerging effects. The panel emphasizes that even if expert explanations claim trace, minimal quantities do not reassure all caregivers given rising rates of developmental issues despite fewer births. Observations on public health trends and caller concerns - The panel highlights a marked rise in developmental disorders (ADHD, autism, learning disorders, emotional instability) among children after a period when these categories expanded, juxtaposed with a decreasing birth cohort, implying a seemingly paradoxical upward trend when viewed by percentage. - General concerns extend beyond vaccines to other substances in the modern environment (artificial sweeteners, residual pesticides like neonicotinoids, artificial colorings) as potential public health risks. Responses and policy points from officials - The formal framework: Routine vaccination is a matter of public health policy; the Vaccination Act provisions empower municipalities to issue notifications and encourage vaccination, but the notifications are not coercive mandates. Vaccination reminders for vaccines like MMR, HPV, and Japanese-origin vaccines are described as communications to encourage uptake rather than punitive actions. - If a caregiver declines vaccination, it is stated that this alone does not constitute abuse or neglect, and refusal to vaccinate is not treated as neglect in determining child welfare. The responses emphasize that “prevention vaccination being unvaccinated” should not automatically trigger neglect findings. - The panel distinguishes between a notification (intervention to promote vaccination) and a neglect finding; it is stated that unvaccinated status alone does not automatically lead to neglect designation. - There is emphasis on informing and sharing information among healthcare providers, educational staff, and child-care settings to ensure consistent understanding that vaccination status is not equivalent to parental neglect. There is a call for standardized awareness within healthcare, child-care, and school administrations. - Questions also address administrative processes: whether vaccination history must be included in the Health Liaison form used during daycare enrollment, and whether non-vaccinating caregivers should be labeled as negligent. Officials indicate that vaccination history should be recorded but that lack of vaccination should not penalize enrollment; information sharing across child-care and school systems should be possible to reduce stigma. - The dialogue includes concerns about the attitudes of some caregivers and teachers who may perceive non-vaccination as laziness; officials stress reducing such misconceptions and promoting respectful, informed decision-making. Concluding remarks from the speakers - The dialogue clarifies the difference between interference/consultation (干渉通知) and formal seeking of consent (勧告) for vaccination, and confirms that neglect findings should not be based solely on non-vaccination. The speakers express an intention to promote accurate, balanced information and to reduce stigma around families who choose not to vaccinate, while continuing to encourage vaccination as a public health measure.