reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 reports that fertility clinics have observed drastic reproductive issues linked to inoculation: “the sperm of inoculated men does not swim. The eggs of inoculated women do not grow into embryos,” with those conceptions showing “a huge amount of contamination with stuff that's non organic.” They reference a Pfizer safety study in the first New England Journal of Medicine (June 2021), stating that, “if you look at the raw data, it proves that eighty percent of the women who get the shot in this first and second trimester, basically zero to twenty weeks, have an eighty percent miscarriage rate.” The baseline miscarriage rate is described as one in six, and they claim it is now seven to eight times that amount. Doctor James Thorpe is cited: a “seventy nine percent increase in fetal malformations” and “unprecedented numbers of stillbirths,” alleging censorship by the mainstream media. The speaker mentions a publication titled My Cycle Story with many scientists, including Doctor Hooker, presenting a database of “over 6,000 women that came forward because their voices were being silenced.” They note about “20,000 women on Facebook” discussing menstrual experiences, including reports of severe bleeding, not mild symptoms, and that “90 year olds beginning bleeding again.” The speaker describes clots: women calling with clots passing for weeks. They reference “two VAERS cases of little girls, 18 old girls, who hemorrhaged and died,” within the My Cycle Story data. The database included “over 6,000 women,” and they looked at the baseline rate of decidual cast shedding (the uterus shedding its entire inside in one piece, looking like a plaster cast). They report that in their data, it was “like two sixty nine women” who reported this. They note that most of the original database consisted of women who hadn’t even had the shot, implying the phenomenon affects coagulation pathways in the body and is not limited to vaccinated individuals. The speaker emphasizes the impact on fertility and reproductive health, warning of the potential horror for young women who “realize they will never be able to get pregnant because they had that shot.”

Welcome back to Media Blackout. Recent studies reveal concerning evidence regarding COVID-19 vaccine shedding. A study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory found that women indirectly exposed to vaccinated individuals reported significant menstrual irregularities, with a 34% higher risk of heavier bleeding. Additionally, a new paper confirmed the presence of residual DNA in COVID-19 vaccine vials, raising questions about safety and potential gene integration. Reports also indicate worsening heart conditions among the vaccinated, with Pfizer accused of concealing deaths during trials. The implications of these findings, including the potential for indirect transmission of harmful elements, warrant further investigation. Doctor Jessica Rose emphasizes the need for more research on these issues, as emerging health concerns continue to arise in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations alike.

All vaccines can spread sickness, including the COVID shot and flu shots. Skin contact can also transmit illness, so avoid hand sanitizers and use essential oils or ozonated oils instead. Immune-boosting products like those from true47.com can help. The COVID shot may have caused menstruation issues in women due to XMRVs. Shedding of synthetic syncytin from the shot can lead to health problems, especially if you have had previous vaccine injuries. Remember, being unwell does not make you unclean.

Dr. Lewis presents data showing that a vaccinated person's blood can affect an unvaccinated person during sex, leading to health issues like candida overgrowth. He shares a case study where a patient experienced symptoms after intercourse with a vaccinated person. Dr. Lewis aims to raise awareness about this transmission route, similar to HIV. He plans to continue researching and treating affected individuals. Join his Telegram group for updates.

When people received their first COVID nineteen vaccine, it was the first time their body received lipid nanoparticles. People historically have this confidence in the concept of, oh, it's just a vaccine. Lipid nanoparticles go everywhere in the body, to the brain, to the bone marrow, to the liver, to the spleen, most importantly to the reproductive organs. I regret it every single day that I walked into my local pharmacy to get that shot in my arm. I feel like my body is eating itself.

Speaker 0 asked how many of his patients or pregnant women he knows experienced miscarriages after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Speaker 1 responded with observational data from his practice. He said that in fall of the previous year, about 60% of pregnant patients in his practice were vaccinated, which he noted is commensurate with Florida’s overall vaccination rate of about 60–65–70%. Most of his pregnant patients received three injections, with very few receiving four or more, and the majority received their injections in 2021 and early 2022. He referenced a Substack by Jessica Rose from November 2022 that presents his data pictorially, and noted that his data runs from January 2020 to November 2022. In 2020, he observed many newly registered obstetric patients (represented by blue bars for first-trimester new pregnancies). He stated there were the most deliveries, suggesting a lockdown-related effect. He then discussed miscarriage rates. He noted that standard textbooks and articles quote a normal miscarriage rate of 13–15%, but he has never seen that clinically. A 2020 study by Nairt et al. reported the actual first-trimester miscarriage rate as 5–6%, and he considers that even that to be somewhat high. He reported his own average miscarriage rate in 2020 as 4% month-to-month. He stated that his miscarriage rate from year to year increased: in 2021, the average month-to-month rate was 7–8%, with a peak in November that year, when a non-clinical staff member told him there had been eight miscarriages in a single month in a practice that delivers 20–25 patients, a “huge number.” In 2022, the average month-to-month rate rose to 15% (up to November). In December 2022, there were 41 newly registered patients, and 13 of them lost their babies, which is 25% for that month. In January and February 2023, the rate remained high, and only normalized around June, with a subsequent slight rise and fall by September. Regarding whether the miscarriages were associated with vaccination, he said it is hard to determine: he could tell that about 60% of his patients were vaccinated, but many new patients had not yet appeared in his practice, since he is the sole clinician who asks every patient about vaccination, brand, and timing, as well as prior COVID infection. He noted that asking a patient who miscarries if they received an injection could come across as accusatory, so obtaining complete data is challenging. He concluded with the observation that the information is difficult to ascertain precisely and that not wanting a patient to feel blamed complicates collecting definitive links between vaccination and miscarriage.

A 52-year-old woman regrets getting the vaccine because she believes she didn't need it. She had already contracted COVID multiple times before getting vaccinated. During her annual physical, she tested positive for an autoimmune issue and wondered if it was related to receiving the booster shot and subsequently getting COVID within three weeks. The woman consulted a top rheumatologist in New York who confirmed that she wasn't the only one experiencing this issue.

The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.

Speaker: Humanity was hit with dual biological weapons. When I say dual, I mean by the manufactured SARS CoV two virus that was manufactured in collaboration with UNC Chapel Hill and Wuhan. So we have that that has exposed basically the entire population to the spike protein. But then we also had the second biological weapon, was the mRNA injections, which installed about 7x more spike into people and those who received it per injection. And now we do understand that this can indeed shed onto others, particularly when you're freshly vaccinated and you're producing high levels of spike protein. We do believe this can shed via what's called exosomes, either through your breath or through your bodily fluids. So, yes, humanity has been hit by these weapons.

I sincerely apologize for dismissing concerns about menstrual irregularities caused by the Pfizer vaccine. A Pfizer executive confirmed that they were aware of this issue. Pathological specimens showed an excess of spike protein in the ovaries, adrenal gland, myelin, and neuronal cell wall. The spike protein also affects plasminogen activator inhibitor, leading to bleeding and clotting problems. It can cause issues with the lining of the arteries, including the uterine wall. There are at least five mechanisms that could be causing these problems. I have learned that certainty and hubris are the enemy, and we should not discount anything until we have all the data. COVID-19 may also be a factor. The vaccine seems to only deliver the spike protein, not the nucleocapsid protein.

The speakers discuss potential reproductive toxicology related to lipid nanoparticle bioaccumulation in the ovaries. One speaker co-authored a paper on decidual cast shedding, observed even in unvaccinated individuals, possibly due to a bystander effect. Studies in Brazil with rats showed a 16% decrease in embryo implantation. The speakers claim ovaries and eggs have ACE2 receptors, and circulating spike protein can bind to these receptors, inducing inflammation. They hypothesize about spike protein shedding, referencing a Wuhan study detecting spike in sweat. They cite Pfizer documents mentioning avoiding skin contact with pregnant women post-vaccination. Self-spreading vaccines used for sterilizing rabbit populations are mentioned. The speakers suggest spike protein binding to ACE2 could induce inflammation in the ovaries, potentially affecting women's cycles through pheromones. They are conducting surveys on decidual cast shedding and plan a deeper analysis in future papers.

Speaker 0: We need to investigate irregularities in their menstrual cycle, that’s number one, because that’s a little concerning and the reaction shouldn’t be interfering with that. Speaker 1: You’re a urologist, you must understand what’s going on with it. Speaker 0: It’s weird. I hope we don’t find out that there’s somehow this mRNA losing the body, because it has to be impacting something hormonal. It can impact menstrual cycles. The entire next generation is, like, super fucked up. Speaker 1: So tell me more, what’s developing with the mutation process? Speaker 0: They’re still conducting experiments, they’re optimizing it slowly, they’re very cautious and don’t want to accelerate too much. They’re doing it as exploratory work so you don’t advertise future mutations. Speaker 1: How would the research study be delayed for COVID stuff? Speaker 0: Now we’re focusing on mRNA beyond COVID. Our forward-looking studies must stay on track. Speaker 1: What is RNA going to be used for in the future? Speaker 0: Lots of stuff. Not just for viruses—we’re applying it to oncology, gene editing, and more. The portfolio has moved beyond COVID. There’s a dedicated COVID environment team; the company is asking where they’ll use this technology in the future for investors. Speaker 1: Is Pfizer going to be held liable for vaccine injuries? Speaker 0: I don’t think so. Usually drugs have known side effects. There have been reports like Clozapine being illegal, and Biox with heart issues—though that wasn’t for us, it was another company. They told me to monitor over time. So far, nothing major; we’ll see if anything arises. Speaker 1: Hope nobody grows three legs or the entire next generation is fucked up. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Or that their menstrual cycles are investigated down the line because that’s concerning. If you think about the science, it shouldn’t interact with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, which links hormones and menstrual cycles. It shouldn’t interfere—yet something might be happening. Speaker 1: The HPG axis. Speaker 0: It goes hypothalamus, pituitary, gonads—signal shingles. The HPG axis is tied to fertility problems. Speaker 1: They decide to pack these hormones somehow. But the signaling into the brain is tricky, and the vaccine doesn’t cross the blood-brain barrier. Speaker 0: If it does come down the line and something bad happens, there’d be substantial criticism given the social pressure and professional consequences. If downstream issues are really serious, the scale would be significant.

Speaker introduces herself as 'the girl that brought vaccines to market' and cites data that 'the messenger RNA killed the bifidobacteria,' claiming this controversy has halted research and science. She asserts, 'What we discovered with the vaccine is that it did kill the bifida bacteria within a month, persisted in killing the bifida bacteria.' She notes daily reports of 'long COVID or vax' and outlines her interview approach: asking patients if they had COVID, were vaccinated, and whether they contracted COVID after vaccination, concluding 'did the vaccine kill their bifida bacteria.' She describes the immune concept as thinking of the body as 'a group of communities, group of gangs or communities in your gut,' warning that a 'foreigner' prompts autoimmunity. She argues vaccination may 'kill your bifidobacteria,' leading to timing effects on long COVID or vaccine injury, with 'zero bifidobacteria across the line.'

Self amplifying mRNA vaccine, which got fast track FDA approval a few months ago for the h five n one influenza. "That's even worse, quote, self replicating. We know Pfizer admits that their COVID shot is self replicating, thus sheds. This is officially sheds." "But now, when these self amplifying mRNA vaccines shed, they are shedding machinery that if you take it into your body, will start producing more mRNA." "There are women who miscarried when they were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna vaccine." "Pfizer told their officials that they had to report in the trial if any pregnant woman was exposed to anyone who was vaccinated." So shedding was a problem. So many people, like, didn't take it, but their spouse did. They got sick.

Speaker 0: The speaker acknowledges the topic as real, noting initial skepticism and later personal evolution on the issue. Speaker 1: Describes early vaccine rollout with social media noise, driven by women reporting sudden menstrual abnormalities after years of regular cycles. They noticed cycles off, heavy bleeding, missed periods, and painful periods after vaccination, though they themselves had not been vaccinated. Social media groups formed, including a website called My Cycle Story where women shared experiences. When fact-checkers and deplatforming followed, the speaker and others remained skeptical but curious, eventually turning to scientific research. The first patient treated was in March 2021, a woman who had seen a massage therapist who had been boosted the day before. That night she missed her period within two days, had tender, swollen breasts, cramping, and had been very regular for about twenty years; she was about 43 and described the change as totally abnormal, linking it to the close exposure to the massage therapist. The speaker initially believed ivermectin binds spike and thought shedding might be possible, so the patient was placed on ivermectin, after which her period returned within five days, though she remained uncomfortable and continued to have an irregular cycle. This is cited as the first anecdote. Speaker 1: After opening their practice, the speaker and their partner began seeing these phenomena in their patients, including some who were vaccine-injured. They challenge the notion that shedding affects only the unvaccinated or anti-vaxxers, noting vaccine-injured patients who are sensitive to exposure to other vaccinated individuals. They observed that shedding phenomena occur in a small cohort who are sensitive to environmental or pharmacological factors. They describe shedding as very common, though the degree to which it affects others is variable. Their best current insight, after extensive research and discussions with other clinicians, is that shedding tends to happen to people who are environmentally or pharmacologically sensitive—those who have allergies or difficulty handling pharmaceuticals and environmental exposures. They suggest there is a broader cohort that is sensitive but not always aware of what is happening. In summary, shedding is not limited to unvaccinated individuals, and a small, highly sensitive group may be more affected, while many people remain unaffected.

A spreadsheet showing tens of thousands of women allegedly damaged menstrually by the injection was created. According to the speaker, the spreadsheet showed 15,000 women bleeding every day, 10,000 bleeding twice a month, and 7,500 with no periods at all. The speaker claims 10-year-old girls bled upon injection, and 85-year-old women bled. The speaker states this chart went to the White House, Dr. Walensky, the FDA, POTUS, and 15 White House staffers on 04/20/2021. Three days later, Dr. Walensky allegedly told women there's no bad time to get the Pfizer or COVID injection before, during, or after pregnancy. The speaker claims that while Pfizer's trials proved the shot destroyed women's menstrual cycles, they were simultaneously developing a product for women with excessive menstrual bleeding. This product was allegedly rolled out one month after the report went to the White House.

A recent study indicates potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine shedding, revealing that women indirectly exposed to vaccinated individuals reported menstrual irregularities similar to those directly vaccinated. The study found that proximity to vaccinated individuals increased the likelihood of abnormal menstrual symptoms. Additionally, a new paper confirmed the presence of residual DNA in COVID-19 vaccine vials, raising concerns about contamination and its implications for health. Reports suggest that heart conditions in vaccinated individuals are worsening over time, with accusations against Pfizer for concealing adverse events during trials. The discussion highlights the urgent need for further research into these findings and their potential impact on public health.

Speaker 0 added a comment building on what Tina said about changes in personality, depression, and related symptoms. They stated that the issues are “very real” and said they have identified the reasons “from theory” and with “some doctors in Italy,” as well as “some pathologists” who have confirmed these reasons. Speaker 0 claimed that the spike protein “unfortunately attacks and destroys also the endocrine system.” They explained that the endocrine system includes “the glands producing hormones,” and they said that these hormones “are what make our emotions and feelings and all those things.” In their view, this connection is directly relevant to why people experience changes in personality and other emotional or mental effects. Speaker 0 then referenced an Italian pathologist “near Venice.” They said this pathologist “went on a newspaper” and reported that, among “all the brains he had investigated,” he found the pineal gland “completely destroyed” in “all the people who were vaccinated.” Speaker 0 presented this as an example supporting the idea that the spike protein is dangerous to the endocrine system. According to Speaker 0, because the spike protein affects the endocrine system—particularly through harm to hormone-producing glands, and specifically via the pineal gland as described by the Italian pathologist—the result is changes in personality. They also linked the endocrine disruption to depression, describing the emotional and personality changes as a downstream effect of the claimed destruction of hormone-related systems. Overall, Speaker 0’s main points were: (1) changes in personality and depression are described as real; (2) the reasons are said to come from theory and confirmation by doctors and pathologists in Italy; (3) the spike protein is described as attacking and destroying the endocrine system; (4) hormones from endocrine glands are said to govern emotions and feelings; (5) an Italian pathologist near Venice is said to have reported pineal gland destruction in the brains of vaccinated individuals; and (6) this endocrine-system impact is said to be why people experience changes in personality.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

A man who was unvaccinated had symptoms after being intimate with a vaccinated woman, due to vaccine shedding. He experienced chest pains, mental fog, sore throat, and fatigue. He was advised to use nattokinase, bromelain, curcumin, and eventually Ivermectin, which helped him recover. The difficulty in obtaining Ivermectin was noted as intentional harm.

Dr. Biss, an experienced OBGYN, discusses the potential effects of COVID-19 vaccines on women's reproductive health. He mentions that there have been reports of changes in menstrual cycles and postmenopausal bleeding in vaccinated women. Some women experienced a condition called passing a decidual cast, where the uterine lining sheds all at once, causing intense pain and hemorrhaging. Dr. Biss also notes that premature ovarian failure and abnormal bleeding patterns were observed in some women who received the vaccine early in their menstrual cycle. Regarding miscarriages, Dr. Biss shares that his practice saw an increase in miscarriage rates in vaccinated patients, but it is challenging to determine the exact correlation between vaccines and miscarriages due to limited data. The majority of his patients received the Pfizer vaccine.

An unvaccinated man experienced symptoms after being intimate with a vaccinated woman due to vaccine shedding. He took nattokinase, bromelain, curcumin, and eventually Ivermectin to alleviate the symptoms, feeling 100% better after taking Ivermectin. The difficulty in accessing Ivermectin indicates intentional harm.

Autopsy series have shown that the amount of spike protein after vaccination in spermatozoa is truly astonishing, so that vaccinated men who have sex with unvaccinated partners can transfer spike protein, and we know of women who have had relations with their partner and have developed symptoms of spike disease. Recently vaccinated individuals exhale exosomes, which are like lipid nanoparticles with spike protein. If you are in close contact or reasonable proximity to someone recently vaccinated, you can inhale these exosomes and be spiked. This is a real phenomenon, but nobody wants to study it or publish data on it. Most of the cases we know about are anecdotal, but it does happen.

The speakers discuss the potential impact of COVID vaccines on reproductive health. One speaker references Naomi Wolf's claim that boys were "neutered in utero" when their mothers were vaccinated, based on Pfizer's reporting. Another speaker claims that female vaccines wipe out about 60% of eggs, which is brutal. For men, the vaccines drop sperm count and motility significantly for about six months, but that rebounds. The vaccines raise the rates of miscarriages, stillbirth, premature delivery. Maternal mortality is at a record high, and it is almost certainly among the vaccinated. A former Danish public health official, Bibiki Managy, found that global fertility plunged around December 2021, about nine months after the vaccines rolled out. The speakers suggest that vaccines may affect the process of forming eggs or oocytes in young girls. Menstrual periods are disturbed, and the whole cycle is thrown off. COVID vaccines actually cause autistic behaviors in mice.

The speaker discusses the strange situation regarding the pharmacovigilance system's early awareness of menstrual side effects from the vaccine. Despite this, the European Medicines Agency initially concluded that it was not significant, but recently revised their diagnosis. It is peculiar that while the pharmacovigilance system alerted early based on feedback from vaccinated individuals, it took a considerable amount of time for the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety to accept it as a probable side effect.