reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Most of us feel uncomfortable about pedophiles, but we must separate feelings from actions. We should treat them with respect, acknowledging they did not choose their sexuality. Pedophilia is a sexual preference, not a choice. Trying to eliminate them from society is impractical and unfair, as it is a biological aspect that cannot be changed. New individuals are born with this orientation daily, and they have not committed any wrongdoing.

Why do you want to harm children? What is wrong with you? It shouldn't be about gender or profession; it's about the actions being taken.

Speaker 0 presents a disturbing set of preferences expressed as a personal viewpoint. The speaker rejects any idea of waiting or gradual enjoyment, insisting, “No, bitch. I wanna drink it straight from the tap. I want it raw. I don't wanna wait a moment. Right when the milk is good, I wanna start drinking the milk.” This metaphor is used to describe a desire for immediacy and immediacy in relationships. The speaker then extends the metaphor to women, arguing against aging in a traditional, patient way. They state, “Same thing goes with women. I don't wanna turn 30 and find some 20 year old, 29 year old woman that I have something in common with and it's like, hey, properly aged like wine. Women don't age like wine, they age like milk. They don't age like wine. That's not how their hormones work.” The claim asserts that women do not age gracefully like wine, but rather age like milk, contradicting the notion of aging well. Continuing, the speaker proposes a specific, controversial timeline for marriage and reproduction. They say, “I gotta find my 16 year old wife. Probably when I turn 30 or something.” They justify this with calculations about age differences: “Here's the thing, I don't wanna be like, let's say I get married to an 18 year old now. Six year age difference. When I turn 40, she's gonna be 34. Ew. Well, if I'm 30 and she's 16, fourteen year age difference. When I'm 50, she'll be 36. When I'm 40, she'll be 26.” The speaker draws a progressive, increasingly favorable age difference for themselves as they age. The speaker amplifies their stance with an explicit age preference, saying, “Now we're talking here. Now we're cooking with gas. Now you can see an alternative vision for how things could be. I want a 16 year old who's untouched. Untouched, pristine. Untouched, uncorrupted, innocent.” They further claim, “That's what we all want. And all 16 year olds want an older guy who's like capable and strong and everything to sweep them off their feet. That's what everybody wants. That's what everybody wants.” Overall, the transcript centers on a provocative, highly problematic set of beliefs about age, consent, and the supposed desirability of a 16-year-old partner, framed through aggressive metaphors and explicit preferences.

At a young age, when someone touches your genitals, it can feel pleasurable even if you don't understand what it is. Some may argue that it's sexual assault, but I've always maintained that if the abuser is skilled, you may not even realize it's happening. The abuser can make you feel a certain way without you even knowing it.

This situation is unacceptable and should be rejected by everyone, regardless of their stance. The actions being taken are motivated by personal gain, specifically for fundraising purposes, rather than genuinely protecting individuals. This approach puts women and girls at risk, and it is crucial for everyone to stand against it. Thank you.

In Islam, marrying a 100-year-old woman may cause harm, but marrying a developed 13-year-old may not. The speaker believes it's about avoiding harm in relationships. They mention the legality of marrying older vs. younger individuals in different countries, emphasizing the relative nature of pedophilia.

Men don't have a say in women's sex life. The sexual empowerment of women does not contribute to their objectification, nor does the existence of porn and OnlyFans prove women are okay with being objectified as long as they're getting paid. Instead, it means women can use their bodies the way they want without men's control. Sex work is real work. Women are more accepting of women who can sell sex because it's empowering to do what you want with your body when you want to. It's not shaming customers because it's my body, my choice. On the left side of a woman's brain, there is nothing right, and on the right side of a woman's brain, there is nothing left.

It's disturbing how individuals associated with a particular background control major adult entertainment platforms, exploiting young women for profit and influence. They capitalize on vulnerable individuals, even those fresh out of high school, with no regard for their future. This group is also implicated in trafficking women into certain countries, forcing them into lives of exploitation. This isn't new; similar accusations have been made for decades. They push degeneracy and political agendas, reminiscent of historical events where efforts were made to combat their influence. They use media ownership to exploit and profit, using the money against the rest of us. This has to stop, and awareness is the first step.

A 40-year-old man should not be interested in a 15-year-old girl. There is a debate about the legal age of consent and the age at which a young woman can choose her sexuality. Personally, as a father of four daughters, if one of my 15-year-old daughters dated a 45-year-old man, it would be a concern for me. It makes me reflect on the unequal power dynamics between a 14-15-year-old boy and a 39-40-year-old woman. I have no shame in admitting this and encourage you to think about it.

The old content from ten years ago is being conflated with the current charges from 2021, but anything before 2021 has nothing to do with the case. Here's context for a video circulating of me talking about the "Lover Boy method." You can't just ask a girl to work for you doing webcam. My recruitment process is like a PhD course; I message them on Instagram. I don't mention webcam until after I've had sex with the girl. After that, she takes the PhD test. If she passes and wants to be with you, then you can suggest she works for you. Approaching girls directly about webcam doesn't work. Also, tax is important for controlling your woman. Tell her you're paying the tax, even if you aren't because you are being paid in Bitcoin. This makes her think her taxes are taken care of, so you can pay her less.

At 17, a person is basically an adult and knows what's up. The individual in question said no picture was ever sent. He is friends with Ali; they talk and have been to events since. At CPAC in '21, Lance was texting Ali to hang out at a bar. Smiley admits he didn't protest at all and went along with it. They were talking for years and hanging out. The same is true for Lance.

A man in his forties discusses the moral implications of a 15-year-old girl being involved with an older man. He acknowledges the debate surrounding the legal age of consent and emphasizes that everyone has different moral standards. He mentions that the law applies to everyone and briefly mentions that the legal age of consent allows a girl to choose her sexuality from the age of 15. Another speaker agrees with the man's point and adds that relationships between young boys and older women are also unequal. The conversation ends with the acknowledgment that the topic is not trivial.

The speaker states they could have thrown Ali under the bus a year ago when Milo mentioned rumors, but instead asked for evidence. They didn't want to end a friendship based on hearsay. They felt it was fair to wait for proof before taking action. Speaker 1 says a screenshot Lance has has existed forever and everyone knows about it. They state Ali is gay and hits people up, including teenagers, asking for nudes. Speaker 0 agrees this is gross. They also believe it's wrong for both women and boys to use nudity or sexuality for professional gain. They think that at 15, 16, and 17, people know what they're doing, and that two things can be true at the same time.

In Hollywood, everyone has experienced inappropriate touching, whether they are aware of it or not.

- The conversation centers on Andrew Tate and a divide in the conservative space about whether he is a “good guy” or a bad guy. A video of Tate is shown to frame the discussion. - A video excerpt from Speaker 1 features Tate describing how he became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam studio. He explains he took girls who lacked experience or equipment and built a system that allowed him to convince them to participate, retain 100% control of their income, and ensure they were effective in a highly competitive industry. He stresses that it’s not easy money and that the process requires many tips and tricks to ensure a girl can make money from home, implying that once trained, a girl could potentially earn unlimited money. He also questions why a girl would stay with him once she can make money independently. - Speaker 0 argues that Tate was a webcam operator who objectified women and acted like a pimp. They reference a separate video showing Tate allegedly whipping a girl and note that if the girl was 15 at the time based on Tate’s stated age, that would be problematic. They ask whether Tate should be given a pass and invite thoughts on fairness in criticizing him. - Speaker 2 weighs in with nuance, saying it is not black-and-white and that they have not done a deep dive into Tate’s entire situation. They acknowledge Tate’s past involvement with encouraging girls to participate in OnlyFans-style content and express disapproval, hoping Tate would publicly acknowledge that this was a mistake and express regret. They note that many women enter porn or stripping due to desperation or trafficking, suggesting vulnerability in those Tate might have preyed upon. They admit uncertainty about whether Tate committed criminal acts, mentioning potential legal age issues (Tate operating in a country where the legal age of consent is 16, and a separate girl possibly being 15) and the absence of victims coming forward. - Speaker 2 also claims Tate has been unfairly persecuted. They describe a prior raid/arrest and a social media “PizzaGate” narrative on X (formerly Twitter), arguing that while PizzaGate itself is real, Tate’s alleged actions do not compare to Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged activities. They emphasize that Tate is being portrayed unfairly and that redemption would be preferable. - Both speakers discuss redemption and reform: Speaker 2 suggests Tate could seek redemption by stating regret for past actions, condemning the porn/OnlyFans route, and encouraging women to avoid or leave such work, highlighting the need for support, healing, and respect for women who have experienced abuse. They suggest a forgiving community could respond positively to an acknowledgment and a commitment to change, rather than punitive treatment.

They showed my naked photos in a hearing and twisted my father's love for me into something negative. They have no shame.

People are playing games. When you're 15, you know what a penis is and why people want to see a picture of it. Sending dick pictures at 15 is wrong. Someone is using their sexuality to advance their political career, just as another person is using their political career to advance their sexuality. Since one person wants a career and the other wants sex, there's a deal happening. There's a lurid sexuality, and someone is into teenagers, which is inappropriate and wrong. But a deal is being struck, a quid pro quo: I know I'm giving sex, and I know I'm getting a political advantage in return. The same thing is happening with someone else.

The video discusses the use of young-looking actors in pornographic advertisements and the potential implications. The speaker mentions individuals like Jordy and Jimmy Michaels, who appear much younger than their actual age. They discuss how these ads attract both predatory women and men who are interested in younger individuals. The speaker also mentions that the largest market for these ads is India, where there may be different cultural perspectives on age differences. The video raises concerns about the normalization of such content and the potential for attracting pedophiles. The speaker acknowledges the controversy but believes that the industry will continue to thrive despite criticism.

The speaker asserts that the age of consent is a feminist social construct. They question why people are upset about someone being 17 rather than 18, noting that in Florida the age of consent is 18, while in Illinois it is 17 and in other states it is 16, with variation across countries and states. They point out that when the age of consent is 18 in Florida, dating somebody a year younger is framed as “the worst thing possible,” highlighting how perceptions shift with different statutory ages. The speaker then contends that age of consent is, at its core, about the age at which an adult can consent, and asks, “Do we really believe that you have to be 18 years old in order to consent to sex, otherwise it's rape?” They challenge the notion that adults who are past puberty cannot engage in relationships without it being deemed rape, suggesting a critical view of the rigidity around consent age. In terms of the broader purpose of the age of consent, the speaker offers a provocative interpretation: “What I think age of consent is about is really, … what it's really about is artificially increasing the sexual marketplace value of older women.” They emphasize that this is not presented as a new idea but as a conclusion they have discussed before on the show. The overall argument centers on questioning the universality and motives behind fixed consent ages, contrasting state-by-state differences and scrutinizing the social and market implications they believe are embedded in the concept of consent.

A man in his forties discusses the moral implications of a 15-year-old girl choosing her sexuality. He acknowledges the debate surrounding the age of sexual consent but emphasizes that everyone has different moral standards. He shares a personal anecdote about his own daughters and expresses concern about a 15-year-old girl dating a 45-year-old man. He believes that such relationships are not equal. He concludes by mentioning the concept of sexual majority for both boys and girls.

A man desired by multiple women is seen as more desirable. Therefore, men should include photos with women on their Tinder profiles to show they aren't repulsive to women. Calling out a man's exploits is pointless because it likely increases his status. Insults often target a woman's lack of chastity and a man's lack of experience, because those are perceived as the most valuable things they have to offer.

Men don't have a say in women's sex life. Do you think the sexual empowerment of women in any way contributes to their own objectification? No. Does the fact does the fact that porn and OnlyFans exist prove that women are okay being objectified as long as they're getting paid. No. It means that we can use our body the way that we want to without men's control. Do you consider sex work to be real work? Yes. Yes. And if you don't, you suck. Why are women more accepting of women who can sell sex but are less likely to accept a man who can buy it? Because it's empowering to be able to do what you want with your body when you want to be able to do it. Because it's my fucking body. Body mind choice. My body

Younger girls, like 13-year-olds, are often targeted because older girls, around 18 or 19, are more discerning and less vulnerable. There's a perception that younger girls can be exploited for financial gain, as they are seen as more valuable due to their perceived innocence and virginity. This exploitation is driven by the idea that older individuals can derive pleasure from younger girls, who are often viewed as easier to manipulate.

This situation is unacceptable and should be rejected by everyone, regardless of their stance. The actions being taken are motivated by personal gain, specifically for fundraising purposes, rather than genuinely protecting individuals. This approach endangers women and girls, and it is crucial for everyone to stand against it. Thank you.