reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion on the Shawn Ryan Show centers around recent UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) hearings and testimonies from military pilots and officials. Key points include the description of UAPs, notably dark gray or black cubes within clear spheres, as reported by military pilots who have encountered these objects. The conversation highlights skepticism towards government agencies like NASA and the Pentagon, suggesting they are seeking funding under the guise of studying UAPs while previously denying their existence. Tim Burchett expresses frustration over the lack of transparency and accountability, arguing that government agencies are more interested in securing funding than providing the public with information. He criticizes the secrecy surrounding UAP data, asserting that excessive classification hinders understanding and fuels distrust. Burchett also discusses the recent UAP hearings in Mexico, questioning the credibility of claims made there and suggesting they may have been a publicity stunt. The testimonies from pilots David Fravor and Ryan Graves reveal firsthand encounters with UAPs, including descriptions of their extraordinary capabilities, such as rapid acceleration and maneuverability that defies current human technology. Graves emphasizes the stigma faced by pilots reporting UAP sightings, which discourages open discussion and reporting. David Grusch, a whistleblower, claims that the U.S. government is involved in secret programs related to UAPs, including crash retrieval and reverse engineering efforts. He mentions the existence of non-human biologics associated with these crafts, raising further questions about the government's transparency. Overall, the conversation underscores a growing interest in UAPs, the need for accountability, and the challenges faced by those seeking to uncover the truth behind these phenomena.

On November 14, 2004, radar technicians aboard the USS Nimitz detected multiple unidentified objects descending rapidly from 60,000 feet. Two FA-18 pilots were sent to investigate and observed a Tic Tac-shaped object hovering above boiling water, displaying erratic movement. The object accelerated away at incredible speeds without any visible propulsion. Subsequent investigations revealed 144 unexplained sightings, prompting the Pentagon to establish a UAP Task Force to study these phenomena. Reports indicated that many sightings could be attributed to foreign drones or optical illusions, yet some remained unexplained. The Pentagon's ongoing interest reflects concerns over national security and the safety of military operations.

Ryan Graves, a former Navy pilot with an engineering background, discusses his experiences with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) during his time flying F-18s. He first encountered these phenomena around 2013-2014, shortly after an upgrade to the radar systems on his aircraft. The upgraded APG 79 radar allowed for better detection of objects in the airspace, revealing numerous radar contacts that posed safety concerns during missions. Graves describes the radar's capabilities, explaining that it could track the kinematics of objects but not their shapes. The objects exhibited erratic flight patterns, sometimes remaining stationary despite high winds, which he found perplexing. Initially, he and his squadron believed the radar might be malfunctioning, but they later confirmed the presence of these objects through visual sightings and infrared camera systems. One notable encounter involved a pilot from Graves' squadron who visually saw a dark gray cube inside a translucent sphere, a description that aligns with other reported sightings. The objects often appeared over the ocean, within military operating areas, and were not restricted airspace, raising questions about their origin and purpose. Graves emphasizes the need for proper scientific analysis of these phenomena, as current military tools are not designed for such investigations. He expresses frustration over the lack of attention given to these sightings and the potential safety risks they pose to military and civilian aircraft. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of UAP sightings, including the potential for technological advancements and the societal impact of acknowledging non-human intelligence. Graves notes that there is a growing interest in the topic, particularly among younger generations, and he believes that the government is beginning to take the issue more seriously. He discusses the historical context of UAP sightings, including the 1952 Washington, D.C. incident, and the evolving narrative surrounding UFOs. Graves highlights the importance of transparency and the need for a collaborative approach to understanding these phenomena, suggesting that advancements in technology and communication could facilitate a better understanding of UAPs. Throughout the discussion, Graves maintains that while the exact nature of these objects remains uncertain, there is a clear need for further investigation and open dialogue about their implications for aviation safety and national security. He expresses hope for a future where more information is made available to the public, allowing for a deeper understanding of the phenomena and their potential impact on society.

Luis Elizondo discusses his background in counterintelligence and his work with the U.S. government, particularly regarding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). He describes how he was approached in 2008 to join a secretive program focused on UAPs, which led him to encounter various reports and videos of objects exhibiting extraordinary capabilities, far beyond known technology. Elizondo emphasizes that these objects often lack conventional features like wings or engines, raising significant national security concerns, especially since they are frequently observed over sensitive military installations. He recounts his gradual realization of the seriousness of the UAP issue, noting that many military pilots have reported encounters with these objects, which often maneuver in ways that defy current understanding of physics. Elizondo mentions the existence of numerous classified videos that have not yet been released to the public, asserting that the three well-known Pentagon videos are just the tip of the iceberg. Elizondo reflects on the historical context of UAP sightings, referencing official documents from the 1950s that indicate a long-standing awareness of these phenomena. He argues that the government's reluctance to disclose information stems from a desire to maintain control and avoid public panic, which he believes is misguided. He stresses the importance of transparency and public discourse on the topic, asserting that the American people deserve to know the truth. Throughout the conversation, Elizondo shares personal anecdotes, including a profound experience related to the death of his mother, which led him to contemplate the essence of human existence beyond the physical body. He suggests that the conversation about UAPs transcends national security, touching on philosophical and existential questions about life and intelligence in the universe. Elizondo concludes by emphasizing the need for open dialogue and the responsibility of individuals in power to engage with the public on these critical issues, advocating for a collective understanding of the implications of UAPs and the potential for life beyond Earth.

In spring 1974, Antoine and Jerry Betts discovered a mysterious polished metal sphere, later known as the BET sphere, on their property in Florida. Weighing 21 pounds and measuring eight inches in diameter, the sphere exhibited unusual properties, responding to sound and moving on its own. After media attention, the U.S. military examined it, confirming it was not government property but revealing an internal structure with unknown elements. Scientists speculated it could be extraterrestrial or a damaged probe. Despite offers to buy it, the Betts family faced increasing pressure and threats, leading them to retreat from public life. Theories about the sphere's origin range from industrial equipment to alien technology, but its true nature remains a mystery, with the Betts family ultimately distancing themselves from it.

Skywatcher is a technology company founded because of UAP. After we turn on the dog whistle, UAPs appear daily. "Three classes today" is how the hosts describe sightings with binoculars, a development that has emerged only after five years. They track three spectrums and detect them on radar, then chase in a helicopter, only to have the objects evade them from the ground as well as in the air. The electrooptical system reveals them where the human eye cannot, catching light others miss. James Fowler explains that Skywatcher began after a military career; after retirement in 2020 he started several companies. In 2021, during a government war game, there was an observation of class one UAPs. They initially suspected government origin, and two anonymous pioneers say: "Mr. K," a physicist who helped identify UAPs overhead, and "Mr. D," who contributed with signals. He describes Skywatcher as "a technology company rooted in unexplainable unknown physics" and notes that Skywatcher was the cover term for UAPs in early discussions, stressing that this is private, commercial activity rather than a government program. Nine classes of UAP are outlined. Class 1 is the tetra; Class 2 the tic tac; Class 3 the blob; Class 4 the orb; Class 5 the manta ray; Class 6 the bright star; Class 7 the jellyfish; Class 8 the hornet; Class 9 the egg. They employ electrooptical, midwave infrared, and shortwave infrared sensing plus radar, noting that each class has distinct characteristics. Class 1 tends to fly in groups; Class 2 about 40 feet long and resembles a tic tac; Class 3 vibrates while moving; Class 4 infrared-only as an orb; Class 5 manta rays with vents; Class 6 bright stars that disrupt sensors; Class 7 jellyfish that can disrupt systems and sometimes affect radar; Class 8 hornets difficult to image at close range; Class 9 egg targeted for future demonstration and possible retrieval. Interaction and testing emphasize drone pursuit, sensor data, and contested results. An energy weapon reportedly shut down their systems; jellyfish interference disrupted sensors; and psionic assets are said to influence results in some events. Skywatcher describes government contracts and war-game events that were not strictly UAP data collection, calling this a mismatch between test events and private data gathering. They advocate a disclosure framework, arguing that disclosure should concern science, not aliens, and that Skywatcher remains grounded in unexplainable unknown physics while sharing data where possible. Geopolitically, the question is whether observed phenomena are adversaries or nonhuman intelligence. Jersey drone incursions and talks with Langley are cited to illustrate opacity and attribution challenges. The host and Skywatcher acknowledge potential private sector roles in national security, the possibility of peaceful demonstrations of the egg, and continuing questions about disclosure—whether revealing the science behind the phenomena rather than the tech is the path forward. They keep open to various hypotheses, including holographic or plasmoid explanations, while stressing responsible, nonviolent exploration and data-driven understanding. In sum, Skywatcher frames UAP observation as a private, science-forward enterprise born from unidentified aerial phenomena, pursuing multi-spectrum detection, a formal class taxonomy, and cautious collaboration with government and scientists toward broader, science-centered disclosure and airspace awareness.

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel, an astrophysicist at Stockholm University, has made a groundbreaking discovery of over 100,000 unidentified light-reflecting objects, or "transients," on historical astronomical plates from the Palomar Observatory, dating back to the 1950s. This predates the launch of Sputnik, the first human-made satellite. These transients are described as extremely flat and reflective, akin to mirrors. Villarroel's research rigorously tested the nature of these objects, demonstrating that they are not mere plate defects. A crucial test involved analyzing the objects' presence within Earth's shadow; a significant deficit of transients was observed in the shadow, confirming they are real physical objects reflecting sunlight, as plate defects would be evenly distributed regardless of solar illumination. This finding suggests that a substantial fraction (30-35%) of these observed transients are authentic, orbiting objects. Further corroborating the significance of these findings, Dr. Steven Bruell, a co-author on Villarroel's paper, conducted a study correlating these transients with historical nuclear tests. His research revealed a statistically significant, albeit weak, correlation between the appearance of transients and nuclear bomb detonations, with an almost 68% increased risk of a transient appearing the day after a nuclear test. Bruell's study also found a correlation between UAP reports from the general public and both nuclear tests and transients, forming a "triad" of interconnected phenomena. This suggests an intelligent interest in Earth's nuclear activities by these unidentified objects. The podcast also delves into historical context, including alleged cover-ups by figures like Donald Menzel, who reportedly destroyed astronomical plates at Harvard Observatory after the 1952 Washington UFO flap, and the military's classification of "uncorrelated targets" in space. The discussion highlights the challenges faced by scientists investigating UAP, including skepticism from academia and pressure from peers who fear reputational damage. Villarroel emphasizes the importance of the scientific method, where hypotheses, even controversial ones, must be tested with data. She plans to make her data and code publicly available to encourage independent verification and foster a more open scientific discourse. The podcast also explores theoretical concepts like Bracewell probes and long delay echoes (LDEs), suggesting potential mechanisms for extraterrestrial monitoring or communication that align with the observed phenomena. The hosts and guests conclude that the sheer volume of credible UAP reports and the scientific evidence presented by Villarroel and Bruell indicate that humanity is likely not alone and is approaching a tipping point in accepting this reality, despite institutional resistance. The implications of these discoveries are profound, challenging humanity's perceived unique position in the cosmos. If tens of thousands of non-human, reflective objects were orbiting Earth and showing interest in its activities before humans even launched their first satellite, it necessitates a re-evaluation of our understanding of space, technology, and potential extraterrestrial presence. The ongoing efforts to publish these findings through traditional peer review, despite the inherent difficulties of the topic, underscore a commitment to scientific rigor and transparency in an area historically fraught with secrecy and dismissal.

The discussion centers around the experiences of military pilots, particularly focusing on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Ryan Graves, a former Navy pilot, recounts an incident where he and his squadron observed a dark gray or black cube inside a clear sphere while flying at high speeds. This sighting, along with multiple similar encounters, highlighted the lack of reporting mechanisms for UAPs within both military and commercial aviation. Graves emphasizes that pilots are often hesitant to report sightings due to fear of stigma and potential repercussions on their careers. Graves explains that when pilots see something unusual, they should prioritize flying safely and communicate with air traffic control, but the existing reporting systems are inadequate. He notes that many pilots have seen unidentified objects but are reluctant to report them due to concerns about being labeled or facing scrutiny. The conversation touches on the need for better procedures and education regarding UAP reporting, which Graves is actively working to improve through organizations like Americans for Safe Aerospace. The podcast also delves into the technological aspects of aviation, discussing radar systems and the challenges of identifying UAPs. Graves describes how upgraded radar systems began detecting objects that were previously invisible, leading to increased sightings. He reflects on the implications of these phenomena for national security and aviation safety, expressing disappointment that the government has not taken the issue seriously despite the significant investment in military training and resources. The conversation shifts to the "gimbal" video, a well-known UAP sighting, where the object exhibited unusual movement patterns. Graves clarifies that the term "gimbal" refers to a gyro-stabilized platform, and the object in the video behaved in ways that defy conventional explanations. He emphasizes the importance of gathering more data and reducing stigma around UAP sightings to foster a scientific approach to understanding these phenomena. Graves concludes by discussing the broader implications of UAPs for military operations and national security, advocating for a proactive approach to identifying and addressing these issues. He encourages open dialogue and collaboration among various stakeholders, including government agencies and the public, to enhance aviation safety and address the challenges posed by unidentified aerial phenomena.

The episode centers on a live-stream discussion that blends spontaneous audience participation with in-depth technical chatter about unexplained aerial phenomena and related scientific puzzles. The hosts examine a recent video purported to show a missile interaction with an unidentified object over the sea, debating whether the footage represents foreign technology, a misidentified balloon, or something beyond current craft. They explore how such sightings are tested against known physics, emphasizing rapid, unexpected maneuvers and materials described as deflective or advanced, and they consider why some investigators think certain events could involve propulsion methods or force fields beyond established capabilities. Throughout, the conversation veers into how government and military programs manage ambiguous footage, including how access to data is restricted and how promotional or classified contexts might shape what is publicly discussed. The hosts also recount multiple historical clues and recent analyses about unusual lights captured on long-standing observatories’ records, noting possible connections to major civilian and military activities rather than extraterrestrial origins, while acknowledging recent claims that such lights could be tied to large-scale energy experiments and weapon tests. Interspersed with the news items are practical discussions about the reliability of videos, the challenges of corroborating sightings across different observers, and the importance of having a rigorous approach when evaluating sensational claims. The show keeps a lively pace with audience polls, live chat banter, and personal anecdotes from guests and staff about past collaborations and media appearances, including a broader conversation on how controversial topics are negotiated in mainstream media and entertainment. The hosts also hint at future topics, outlining plans for deeper dives into historical conspiracy narratives, with an eye toward presenting a balanced view that weighs both extraordinary claims and conventional explanations. The tone remains informal and iterative, highlighting the collaborative nature of the channel and the role of skepticism, curiosity, and evidence in navigating a landscape where new discoveries can challenge long-standing assumptions. The episode closes with a sense of community and anticipation for forthcoming explorations, teased partnerships, and potential collaborations across related formats and platforms.

On a panel with David Fravor and David Grusch, Ryan Graves describes how UAP are in U.S. airspace and sightings are routine. Fighters saw objects that were 'steady, they were solid, they were consistent' and some were 'going over the speed of sound.' When crossing that threshold, Graves recalls, an object 'shoots down' and came within about 50 feet of the cockpit, described as 'a dark gray or black cube inside of a clear sphere' about 5 to 15 feet in diameter. Graves describes upgrading from mechanically scanned APG-73 to electronically scanned APG-79 and how these true-time sensors revealed objects in a 'working area' older radars would misclassify as errors. The objects were sometimes '0.0 Mach' and stationary, sometimes '0.6 or 0.8 Mach' and in a holding pattern, moving in a 'sloppy' way. Visual attempts with FLIR showed no obvious shape at times, but later pilots reported near mid-air incidents and hazard reporting after encountering a cube-in-sphere. Graves notes eyewitnesses across bases—Norfolk, Pax River, Fallon—seeing cubes and spheres, often along the coastline. Some at Langley and Norfork reported incursions; in 2004, Fravor described a different craft over water at Nimitz. Graves emphasizes visual confirmation across five safety reports and that 'roughly half the room' later acknowledged the cube-sphere shape. He also mentions USOs and underwater anomalies and NURO as a counterpart to the NRO. Graves discusses governance: Arrow and AARO, the UAP Task Force, and the push for disclosure; he notes the 'UAP disclosure act' and an executive panel could declassify information for public consumption. He describes starting a company building 'space situational awareness cameras' and envisions commercial applications; he calls for private-sector contributions to detection, sensing, and understanding, alongside government work, to move toward disclosure without revealing national-security secrets.