TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

An Axios reporter identified Mike Donlin, Steve Verschetti, Bruce Reed, Anthony Bernal, the First Lady's chief of staff, the First Lady, and Annie Tomasini as having the most control over President Biden's day-to-day activities. A Washington Post columnist has accused the former First Lady of elder abuse. A congressman stated that it is elder abuse and that these officials need to come before the oversight committee to answer questions. He believes that if the President was not in control of his mental faculties, many of his decisions should be invalidated because the country cannot be run by an "auto pen." He stated that if Joe Biden could not execute the duties of his office, then the decisions made by the Biden White House should be investigated. He considers this a major scandal, potentially the biggest in presidential history, surpassing Watergate.

President Trump announced that Joe Biden stole the 2020 election, citing evidence of auto-penned signatures on documents when Biden was out of DC or the country. According to the speaker, Biden unknowingly reversed a ban on liquid natural gas sales after Speaker Johnson brought it to his attention. Trump and his team are reportedly investigating the Biden White House, with the Justice Department also conducting a criminal investigation. The speaker claims this is now the DOJ's main focus. The speaker alleges that trillions of dollars have been stolen and funneled to Democrats. The speaker says Trump is focusing on pardons and the falsification of evidence related to J6. The speaker also alleges the illegitimacy extends to energy policy, military operations, and the bombing of Russia. The speaker claims indictments are forthcoming, potentially including James Comey. The speaker asserts this issue is bigger than Hunter Biden's laptop and that the Biden presidency and actions are illegitimate.

The committee is investigating the validity of executive orders and laws, questioning who authorized low-level staffers to sign Joe Biden's name on documents, especially when he was not present at the White House. They cite the Hur report, which concluded Biden couldn't remember dates of his election or family events, suggesting he may not have been mentally fit to make these decisions. The committee aims to determine who gave the authority for these executive orders and pardons, given concerns about Biden's cognitive state, particularly after his debate with Donald Trump. They question the reports from physician Dr. O'Connor, who stated Biden was mentally fit, which they now believe to be untrue.

This week, the House Oversight Committee will continue its investigation into Joe Biden's mental fitness, with former White House deputy Andrew Bates slated for an interview on Friday and Corinne Jean Pierre and Jeff Zients appearing in coming weeks. Key figures taking the fifth and saying Biden was totally fit and ready to do the job is noted, with claims that “the testimony doesn't add up with what we saw. Something is awry here.” The discussion recalls Ian Sams as “the face of the White House response” who argued Biden was vibrant and that “the family does it,” adding he “only saw Joe Biden two times over a two year period.” They question the “auto pin” and say there were “thousands of pardons and dozens of executive orders that were signed with that auto pin, and it appears without president Biden's knowledge.” They highlight “10 FBI whistleblowers warned of political weaponization,” citing Tulsi Gabbard, John Radcliffe, and Cash Patel; Pam Bondi’s DOJ is expected to start holding people accountable. The panel notes investigations and documents, including those not turned over by the Biden administration, are now being public through Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard. They stress Americans want accountability and that “the day of accountability is near.” On Epstein, victims’ families will meet Tuesday; DOJ cooperation is underway to determine redactions and how best to present the information to the American people, balancing victims’ futures and reputations with transparency. James Comer remains the House Oversight Committee chairman.

Attorney General Merrick Garland is accused of obstructing the release of audio tapes of Special Prosecutor Her's interview with Joe Biden regarding classified documents. Biden allegedly shared classified information with his ghostwriter and struggled to answer basic questions during the interview, showing signs of dementia. Garland has reportedly classified the tapes as top secret and secured them in a SCIF. The DOJ opted not to charge Biden, citing concerns about his mental competency to stand trial, suggesting he would present himself as a "sympathetic, well meaning, elderly man with a poor memory" to a jury. The White House allegedly altered the transcript of Biden's testimony to make him appear more competent. House Oversight Committee is seeking the audio recordings to investigate Biden's handling of classified documents and his fitness for the presidency. The White House claims the GOP wants to use the recordings for political purposes. The speaker asserts that Biden is losing support due to inflation, Afghanistan, open borders, mental incompetence, and a "fake conviction" of Donald Trump.

Peter Doocy brought a prop to the White House briefing: a document from justice.gov that he printed. He stated that one document looked different and authentic. Doocy pointed out that the last name on the document looked as if the president had difficulty spelling it. He then asked why the one thing Joe Biden signed the day before he left was so messy.

Pen that can do that. Right? Look at that, Pam. Is that a good signature? Seriously. Is that a good signature? Who can who can write like that? Nobody. I assume we're looking at the whole auto pen scam, sir, because the person that ran it said he spoke to briefly twice about nothing. That means that all those partners that he gave to some very bad people, very unpatriotic people, very evil people, it looks to me like those partners are are worthless. Because number one, you shouldn't use an auto pen very specifically. And they have to know that the president wanted it. The president didn't want this. The president didn't know he was alive. Okay? He never approved any of this stuff. He wasn't for open borders and all of the other thing. He was never for open borders. I've known Biden a long time. He was never very sharp, but he was never in favor of open borders and all of the other things he did to destroy our country. Let's go. Lastly, sir, this is an executive order on flag burning.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that there are no records of these required signatures, and it's unknown who used the AutoPen. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

Trump declared Biden's pardons void, claiming Biden didn't know about them and that they were signed via autopen. Trump suggests this implies Biden's mental decline, while the media is now allegedly acknowledging it after covering it up. Trump's action is a challenge to Biden's competence, potentially leading to a cognitive test. Trump also stated that those pardoned from the January 6th committee may have committed crimes, suggesting the committee members who deleted evidence should be investigated. This puts pressure on figures like Adam Kinzinger. The speaker criticizes the left's actions against Trump, including the Mar-a-Lago appraisal and changing laws to prosecute him. They advocate for prosecuting those involved in the January 6th committee and others like Fauci and Milley. The speaker questions if Biden was aware of the pardons, suggesting they were issued by those running the country to protect themselves. Speaker Johnson recounted an interaction with Biden, implying Biden was unaware of signing an executive order pausing LNG exports. The speaker urges action against activist judges who obstruct the president's agenda.

Biden auto pen thing was Payola. People were paying for pardons. New revelations from the New York Times about Joe Biden and the auto pen scandal. According to New York Times, mister Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons. Rather than ask Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the auto pen, which they saw as routine. Jeff Zients, former Biden chief of staff, three minutes later, hit reply all and wrote, 'I approve the use of the auto pen for the execution of all of the following pardons.' The final list reportedly included Fauci. 'cash for clemency deal' and 'three people controlled access, and they were making money off of it.' The House Oversight Committee has brought in a number of former Biden aides to speak about this, and this will drive a wave of questions.

The White House was allegedly lying to the press, the public, and even its own cabinet members. Critics point out that Tapper's record on the subject isn't "squeaky clean." President Biden embraces his stutter, while Trump mocks, exaggerates, and belittles it, according to a Washington Post piece. Biden is sharp mentally, but there are questions about his physical condition, given that he is 81. His memory "doesn't seem great," but it's "not horrible."

Some criticism of media coverage of President Biden is fair, including of Speaker 1's own coverage. Looking back, some issues were not covered enough. Reporting revealed that starting around 2019 or 2020, there appeared to be two Bidens: one that was workable and serviceable, and another nonfunctioning one who couldn't recall names of top aides and would lose his train of thought to an alarming degree. The nonfunctioning Biden appeared more frequently, and seemed to get much worse in 2023 and 2024.

Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch discusses allegations against ActBlue, including Elon Musk's claim that it funds groups behind demonstrations against Tesla. Fitton notes ActBlue's leadership changes and questions whether they knowingly accepted illegal foreign donations. He characterizes actions against Tesla as potential terrorist activity targeting a federal official. Fitton dismisses Reid Hoffman's claim of not being able to control where all his money goes, alleging shared values among those involved. He recalls "billions of dollars" that appeared after Harris took over the nomination and suggests a criminal investigation into ActBlue's fundraising practices. He links supporting terrorists abroad with domestic terrorism. Fitton also addresses concerns about Joe Biden's executive orders potentially being signed via auto pen, raising questions about the legality and who was truly running the White House given Biden's "cognitive decline." He criticizes the lack of media scrutiny on Biden's staff and suggests Republicans should have investigated the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment.

Auto pens are described as widely used on Capitol Hill. “I do it because I respect your signature. Mhmm.” Staffers push a button to pass off documents as authentic, not the elected official signing. “They’d be like, oh, I didn’t know. Lock. Get out of jail free card.” The esign Act, signed 06/30/2000, “it is legal for senators to use an auto pen for their signature. However, the esign Act also states that all parties must consent to the use of their signature and must be aware of what they're actually signing.” The gray area: whether staffers used it “without the direction and authorization of the senator.” Senator Ed Markey: “staff uses an auto machine that replicates the senator's signature all the time” for “everything from Veterans Affairs cases to visa issues.” In 2025, “Biden issued 14 executive orders. Every single one was auto pinned.” “staff quietly added violent criminals to the list and then ran them through the AutoPen without telling him.” Hidden Camera shows Markey’s aide bragging “fucked up” while driving, mocking Markey's wife as a Karen, and claiming that white people are afraid of him because he's a black n word. Markey also “takes an aggressive stance against Tesla's autopilot feature.” “This is ironic considering the senator often doesn't even sign his own name without his pen on autopilot.” Tips: o'keefmediagold.com; 0keefemediagold.com or 833324gold. This is James O'Keefe.

The Biden White House is under investigation regarding the use of an "auto pen" to sign documents, with Trump now calling Biden "the auto pen." Bondi's team is investigating Biden's competence and whether others exploited him, questioning if he knew what he was signing, including 8,000 pardons. The investigation was launched after Ed Martin made an announcement at the Department of Justice. The Heritage Foundation found that many documents with Biden's signature used the same auto pen signature. The auto pen was first used regularly by President Truman for simple tasks, but Obama used a portable auto pen in Europe to sign major legislation. The question is whether Biden directed someone to sign his name or if aides had free rein. Speaker Johnson suggests Biden was out of the loop. One source claims a top Biden aide may have misused the auto pen, while David Sacks alleges Elizabeth Warren controlled it. If Biden didn't approve its use, it could be forgery. Some believe Biden wasn't running the country, while others insist he was engaged and gave directives. Jake Tapper's coverage of Biden has prompted CNN to cover the auto pen investigation. Some suggest Democrats should abandon their current machine and rebuild. There's a divide within the Democratic Party between "team restraint" and "team resistance."

Speaker 0 contends that a large number of pardons were issued by the auto pen on the final day of the Biden presidency, and asserts there is no record showing that Joe Biden participated in the authorization of those pardons. The speaker claims that these pardons include notable examples such as those for Dr. Anthony Fauci, members of the Biden family, Adam Schiff, the January 6 committee, and an extensive list that the speaker describes as continuing at length. The core assertion is that every one of these pardons was signed with the auto pen and there is no evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in the decision-making process behind them. According to the speaker, the absence of Biden’s involvement in the decision-making is a key element of the argument, and the implication is that this absence of direct participation should be recognized in legal terms. The speaker further states that these pardons could be declared null and void by the Department of Justice. The underlying claim is that there is a basis for such a nullification rooted in the way the pardons were issued, specifically the use of the auto pen and the lack of documented presidential involvement. The speaker also asserts that the ongoing investigation will produce evidence that will support the DOJ’s decision to void the pardons. In this framing, the investigation’s forthcoming findings are presented as capable of reinforcing the claim that the pardons were improperly issued or improperly authorized due to the absence of direct presidential action. The overall narrative presented is one of procedural challenge to the pardons, anchored in the asserted method of issuance (the auto pen) and the supposed lack of Biden’s participation in the process. The speaker emphasizes a sequence in which the pardons, if deemed void, would be reversed or nullified by official action from the Department of Justice, with future investigative evidence expected to validate that outcome in court.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that no such signatures exist and the origin of the AutoPen use is unknown. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about President Joe Biden’s health, cognitive fitness, and who was calling the shots within the White House during his presidency. Key points and claims raised include: - The campaign and public discourse about the president’s fitness or age were prominent, with questions such as “Was the number one issue in the campaign the president's fitness or his age?” and assertions about visibility, including whether “you ever see president Biden in a wheelchair?” While some speakers note aging and physical signs—“I noticed that, you know, he shuffled more,” and “he has more stumbling over words and gasps than he did” — others maintain confidence in his capabilities, claiming he was “on top of things” and that “his mental acuity is great. It's fine. It's as good as it's been over the years.” - There are allegations of a cover-up by insiders. The narrative asserts “new information now on the people in his inner circle and how the cover up actually operated,” with “Senior aids that worked here until just a couple months ago, the beginning of this year, manipulating an ailing president for their own gain.” A figure asks, “How much were you paid for your role in the campaign in 2024?” with the response “Just a little bit short of $4,000,000.” The implication is that financial incentives influenced actions. - Internal discussions about the president’s decline and how it was handled are described as ongoing. “The official word from Biden world about all these new stories is that nothing has been revealed this week that shows that president Biden was anything but effective president.” There is mention of a senior-level discussion about whether the president should have a cognitive exam. - Testimony from Annie Thomas Seen, former senior adviser to Biden, is presented as significant. She “has now taken the fifth,” and the transcript notes “There is now a pattern of key Biden confidant seeking to shield themselves from criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.” She invokes the Fifth Amendment when asked about being told to lie about the president’s health. - There are explosive claims regarding Hunter Biden’s role. One speaker says, “Hunter was driving the decision making for the family. He was almost like a chief of staff.” There are references to an uptick in activity when Hunter Biden was around, and discussions about pardons for Hunter, with the line “Yes. Were you in favor of Hunter Biden getting a pardon?” indicating support for clemency. - The “auto pen” controversy is described. Speakers discuss whether the president’s name was “hand signed” or “auto pen” used for documents, with questions such as “Did he hand sign all executive orders?” and claims that “the auto bin” or “auto pen” was used and that some believed others may have instructed staff to use it. There is mention that some staff “did not know who was operating the Obalon/auto pen,” and that “an executive order” and “memo” details existed but were not definitively known to those questioned. - Media portrayal and public perception are addressed. Some speakers accuse the legacy media of denial about cognitive decline, while others defend the president’s sharpness, noting that this debate is framed by evolving video and audio coverage, including discussions of “cheap fakes” versus real footage. - Additional context touches on Medicare drug price negotiations as a policy objective, with a line about “the ability of Medicare to negotiate drug prices with big pharma,” and the belief that “if we finally beat Medicare” would be a significant achievement. There are repeated assertions that those who knew and understood cognitive issues took control, implying a broader conspiracy. - Throughout, witnesses emphasize that their statements are contextualized within interviews and testimony, with ongoing questions about who was directing the White House and the true state of the president’s health and decision-making.

Trump accused Biden's staffers of treason, alleging they took over the White House while Biden was senile and unaware. Claims suggest staffers were selling pardons and using an auto pen to sign bills and executive orders without Biden's knowledge. Mike Johnson questioned Biden about cut off natural gas, to which Biden seemed clueless. Whistleblowers claim Biden was unaware of policies enacted in his name. Ben Hur stated Biden was too senile to stand trial regarding classified documents found in his garage. The speaker believes Democrats expected Biden to die in office and hand power to Kamala Harris, but Biden's continued survival is disrupting their plans. Investigations are underway regarding the staffers, auto pen usage, policies, and executive orders. Ed Martin leaked information that several of Biden's staffers have lawyered up, suggesting wrongdoing related to illegally signed pardons. The speaker asserts widespread corruption and deception among Democrats in the White House.

The House Oversight Committee is expanding its investigation into Biden's alleged mental decline, interviewing five members of the Biden administration and deposing former physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor. Chairman James Comer stated that they are serious about the investigation, especially regarding the use of an auto pen to sign executive orders and pardons. Comer said that President Trump has waived executive privilege, and if witnesses don't answer questions or show up for interviews and depositions, they will be held in contempt of Congress. The committee aims to discover who authorized the use of the auto pen, especially since many documents were signed while Biden was supposedly at the White House. Comer believes there was a cover-up of Biden's mental decline and that Anthony Bernal, former chief of staff to Jill Biden, was a major part of that inner circle.

The discussion centers on the legality and appropriateness of Joe Biden's use of an autopen, particularly concerning pardons. It's claimed that the Trump administration believes Biden's autopen use may be unconstitutional if he wasn't fully competent or if others used it on his behalf. A former US attorney claims to have contacted senior Biden officials early on regarding Biden's competence and the pardons, receiving some responses. The speaker argues that incompetence could invalidate contracts and pardons, even though the pardon power is plenary. He alleges a whistleblower from the 2020 Biden campaign identified three "gatekeepers"—Clayne, Anita Dunn, and Bob Bauer—who controlled access and potentially profited from it. While not yet verified, this information is deemed potentially scandalous. The speaker clarified that he contacted the Biden family and others in the US attorney's office.