reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This video shows the crystallography of healthy spring water, characterized by flower-like hexagons. The same patterns are observed in the spring water collected on different days. However, when the spring water is exposed to a five gs cell tower for 15 minutes, its structure becomes disordered and, in the speaker's opinion, completely destroyed.

Speaker 0 provides a step-by-step live demonstration. They state they have Pepsi Max as the product and a fresh base slide, a clean cover slide, and a brand-new pipette just out of its package. They open the product, place one drop of the product on the slide, cover it with the base slide and the cover slide, and then place the slide under a microscope, viewing it in dark field. On the screen, the sample shows a huge amount of dots. The dots are described as not crystals but “dots” that look like quantum dots, appearing all over the slide. The speaker notes that these dots are not put there by them; they are already in the product. They adjust the light and observe that these dots are building together and forming structures. They remark that they left the slide for ten minutes earlier and these dots started to build into structures. The speaker continues to show the slide, highlighting various formations they observe, including what they describe as a fall, a hydrogel ribbon, and other complex structures. They emphasize that they did not place these features there and that they are seeing them live as they go through the sample. They note that the formations appear to be in the product itself and are now building in real time on the slide, creating networks and structures that span across the slide. They compare what they are seeing to items they have observed in blood, stating these dots are similar to what they have seen before, implying a connection to biological-like appearances. They repeatedly assert that the dots and structures are in the product and that they have not introduced them. They mention a Rockefeller quote about putting something in food, suggesting a concern that such substances could be added to products. As the demonstration continues, the speaker reiterates that the phenomenon—dots, networks, and hydrogel-like formations—has been present from the moment the slide was prepared and has been developing for several minutes. They express astonishment and insist that this is not something they placed there, but something observed within the product itself, with the formations continuing to develop as they speak.

The video explores extraordinary megalithic stonework in Peru’s Sacred Valley, focusing on Olantetambo and surrounding sites, and contrasts it with later Inca construction. It begins with observations about rose quartz granite blocks and suggests a binding agent would probably be metal, noting that red granite hardness is about 7.5 on the Mohs scale while bronze is about 3.5, implying bronze could not have been used to shape or finish these stones. The narrator describes the temple entry door as having a double door, a sign of a sacred site, and states that “they leave the best work for the high temple work.” He voices awe at the Sacred Valley of Peru, calling Saxohoman one of the most jaw-dropping ancient sites, with multi-ton, highly precise stonework in granite, diorite, and andesite constructed on mountains in gigantic slabs. He highlights stone features such as “stone nub protrusions” common to megalithic sites across continents, emphasizing a perceived lack of contact between cultures yet widespread similarity. He notes laser-like cuts in bedrock, legends of ancient portals and sacred shrines, and signs of massive destruction. Mainstream archaeology is said to attribute the megalithic works to the Inca civilization at its apex, around 600 years ago, while the video argues these structures go far older. The host explains that the editing and filming were done solo, inviting viewers to subscribe, comment, like, share, and enable notifications. He recalls previous content in Peru, including excavations at Saxohoman, subterranean tunnels and chambers beneath the site, and the idea of a grand Chincana labyrinth extending from Cusco to Saxohoman and other sacred sites. He describes underground digs showing precision carved stones below the earth and chambers carved into bedrock with signs of ancient origin long before the Inca. The Sacred Valley is presented as a landscape with geological stability, hydrological abundance, and astronomical visibility that would have attracted a high civilization; Olantetambo is highlighted as a key megalithic hillside fortress. Camille Save, a Sacred Valley local and author, accompanies the narrator. She helps identify signatures in stone, such as blocks of granite and andesite showing manipulation beyond Inca capability, and the presence of male and female blocks with protruding elements and niches that connect like Lego pieces, interlocking without mortar. The video argues that this method requires force-resistant, large-scale engineering beyond Bronze Age capabilities, a claim used to challenge the chronology that attributes all megalithic work to the Inca. The megalithic blocks are described as being smoothed without chisel marks, with smooth indentations and grooves that suggest an alternative to hammering tools. Attention is given to bedrock work near Olante Tambo, including Hanampacha blocks integrated into bedrock and sometimes embedded with megalithic pieces. The host notes the bedrock is often higher quality than the surrounding Inca walls, and that higher sections show even more refined joinery—joinery so tight that “you can't fit a hair in between the rocks.” He questions how Bronze Age chisels could produce such precision and suggests a stark contrast between megalithic work and later Inca rough-cut stonework, especially on terraces and dairies added by the Inca. The discussion covers several recurring enigmas: the knobs (nubs) protruding from stone and bedrock, whose function remains unclear; the possibility that knobs are not merely lifting points since they occur on bedrock and are not universally present; the theory that knobs could encode information or be related to a quipu-like stone-language; and the broader question of whether a lost technique softened stone or involved artificial stone molding. A proponent named Marcel Fonti is mentioned, who advocates an artificial-stone slurry theory, with some blocks showing signs of potential castings or mold-related signatures, though the speaker remains open to multiple explanations and notes the lack of universal evidence for casting. Vitrification is discussed as a signature seen in certain blocks at Olante Tambo, suggesting heating to high temperatures that could indicate ancient processes beyond Bronze Age capabilities. The video compares Osirian hydrological engineering in Egypt with Peru’s bedrock channels that slow or alter water flow, noting that water in some cases behaves in anomalous ways when interacted with. The narrator emphasizes the extraordinary scale of the rose-quartz granite blocks, their interlocking polygonal joints, and the suggestion that these walls were designed for seismic resistance and energy dissipation. As the journey nears the top of Olantetambo, the megalithic work yields to more basic Inca wall construction, yet the Inca blocks are shown repurposing or rebuilding atop older megalithic fragments. The narrator highlights that the Inca did not create the megalithic sections at the same scale, precision, or methodology, and argues that the differences in technique and quality across the site challenge a single-chronology narrative. A final stop is Naupa Huaca Iglesia in the Sacred Valley, where an altar carved into bedrock and a precisely carved false doorway are presented. The doorway is described as a gateway with legends of a harmonically responsive portal, and a tale of an Incan priest who migrated the sun disc to this site during the Spanish conquest. The segment ends with a sense of wonder about ancient engineering and a suggestion that the sites hold more questions than answers, inviting continued exploration into the origins and methods behind Peru’s ancient stonework.

In this video, we explore the art of geopolymer, which was used to create astonishing works of art in the dark ages. Geopolymer is the technique of casting artificial stone, and it can be recreated today. By using 3D printers to create molds, geopolymer blocks can be made, allowing for easier construction that can last for hundreds or even thousands of years. This raises questions about whether ancient civilizations used geopolymer casting to create structures worldwide, and challenges the truth we've been told about our ancestors.

The video explains that there is no such thing as “stone softening.” Instead, it describes chemical etching of stone to produce water glass (silicate) through a controlled reaction of lyes (potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide) with silica from sand, resulting in a hardened material used to imitate carved stone. Core idea and ingredients: - The process uses potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, sand (or crushed stone like granite), and water. The presence of salt in Peruvian soil and plants explains the combination of KOH and NaOH in a craft context. - Lye makes the stone react chemically, producing water glass rather than actually softening stone. The two lyes are caustic and can etch glass; safety gear (goggles, rubber gloves) and outdoor operation are advised. - A eutectic effect lowers the melting point of the mixture to about 168°C when KOH and NaOH are combined, enabling the reaction to proceed at normal kitchen-like temperatures. - The method aims to melt the lyes with water and silica to form water glass, which then set into a solid, glue-like matrix capable of embedding sand to form an artificial stone. Setup and equipment: - A rock or inexpensive stainless steel pot is used; copper or iron would be destroyed by molten lye, so stone vessels are traditional, though a stainless pot is acceptable. - A hot plate provides the necessary heat; ventilation is important due to corrosive vapors, and only a small window may not suffice. - The artist notes that the pot’s material will be etched by lye, which is expected, and that the finished product is intended to be waterproof after drying. Day-by-day procedure and math: - Day 1: Measure 25 g potassium hydroxide and 25 g sodium hydroxide. Dissolve them in 1 deciliter of water (add lye to water, not vice versa). Add 100 g sand to the alkaline solution. The lyes dissolve some sand to form an initial water glass; for a modulus of 2.5 (longer silicate chains), more silica is needed, so 80 g is theoretically enough, but 100 g is used to allow margin since sand isn’t 100% CO2-free. - Boiling occurs in two rounds on different days. Early bubbles are tiny, then coin-sized, then large as more sand converts to water glass. The mixture can rise to about 180–250°C, with the eutectic point at 168°C. - After about 30 minutes, the first boil yields a soft, bottom layer; the material is cooled below 100°C, and 2 dl of water is added to dissolve the formed water glass. Day 2: the semi-solid mass dissolves within 24 hours, but a green tint indicates lye attacking the pot. - Initial product is modulus one water glass (one silicon oxide per metal atom). To increase modulus to two or three (stronger, longer silicate chains), a second boil is performed. The second boil begins after the water added has boiled away; the material heats further as modulus two material forms. Bubbling resumes as modulus two reacts with remaining sand, producing modulus two water glass and leaving a desert of modulus two material behind. - After cooling, water is reintroduced (2 dl) and left to sit for another 24 hours. Day three can show incomplete dissolution; Day four could include a third boil (not performed here for brevity), but the video proceeds to masonry work with the finished water glass. Masonry and use: - The finished water glass is mixed with additional sand to form a very wet slurry, shaped on a tilted tray to drain excess lye. After about a month, it becomes waterproof. If pine wood ash (about 100 g) is added, setting is accelerated, yielding waterproofing by the next day. - The method is claimed to replicate ancient Peruvian stone carvings and is said to work with granite rubble as well. The presenter invites others to test the recipe and verify results. Conclusion: - The video frames this as two cooking steps to produce water glass via a controlled reaction of potassium and sodium lye with sand, enabling the creation of an artificial, waterproof stone-like material with layered silicate structures.

Citric acid, once sourced from lemons, is now produced industrially at 2,000,000 tonnes annually. It is derived from the fermentation of sugars like molasses and cornstarch by the mold aspergillus niger, often GMO corn. This byproduct is added to various food products. Citric acid is not fruit-derived but mold-fed. The video questions whether this ingredient benefits or weakens us.

The limestone pillar appears ordinary, adorned with artwork.

Thermoluminescence (TL) is a technique that dates objects, even stones, by determining when they were last exposed to sunlight. Cosmic radiation constantly hits objects, and when an object is kept in the dark, it traps electrons knocked out of place by this radiation. When the object is exposed to heat or sunlight, the trapped electrons release a flash of light, which is thermoluminescence. The brighter the light, the longer the object was in the dark. For carved stones, the act of carving resets the TL clock. By analyzing the light emitted when a sample of the carved surface is heated, scientists can estimate how long it's been since the carving occurred. TL has refined the dating of ancient pottery and stone tools. A key limitation is that light doesn't penetrate far into the stone, requiring careful sampling of the outer layer exposed to sunlight during carving. TL allows dating of events that didn't leave behind organic materials for carbon dating.

Speaker 0 decided to build a menhir in their backyard. They said one recipe is already proven and “rock solid,” and it “actually creates stone.” The binder they described is a mixture of water glass (sodium silicate) and pine ash. They noted that although the material looks gray, it contains “not a single gram of Portland cement,” and that the gray color comes from the wood ash. Speaker 0 is considering making the menhir about 9 to 10 meters tall (around 30 feet) and asked whether that height would be tall enough. They said the structure currently does not even reach their knees and referred to “here it is.”

Speaker 0 outlines a cavemen–style method for casting an artificial stone “huge stone” inside a plastic cup, using no cement mixer, no drill, no vibration, no scale. The process uses water glass, sand or crushed stone (granite grit or desert sand), and a pinch of slaked lime as a 2% catalyst. Step one: the spirit test. If your water glass doesn’t gel after a sip of whiskey or strong spirit, stop. Step two (for beginners): measure roughly 100 grams of sand or granite grit and 2 grams of slate lime, maintaining approximately a 2% catalyst. The presenter demonstrates by placing 100 g of silica sand in one cup and 1 g of lime in another, then adds a second gram of lime. The 2% catalyst visibly stains the sand white, so he no longer uses a scale and adds lime until the color clearly changes. He repeats this with ground granite—lime lightens it as well. The basalt powder shows no color change because it’s a modern ultra-fine powder where the lime disappears; the desert sand (lemon yellow, terrarium-type) also turns white with 2% lime. Four candidates are tested: silica sand, granite grit, basalt powder, and desert sand. Next, the wet mixing method. Instead of measuring the water glass, the mold (a plastic pudding cup) is filled with about one centimeter of undiluted water glass, often boiled to thicken. The dry, catalyzed mix is spooned into the water glass and immediately begins to clump due to surface dehydration and gelling. The clumps are broken up while still underwater to keep the mixture bubble-free; this is done by spooning and crushing beneath the liquid surface. The goal is to fill under the surface so bubbles rise out, preventing bubbles in the final stone. The process continues until the submerged fill reaches the height of the neighboring “stone wall.” Excess water glass is addressed by poking a hole low on the mold to allow the liquid to drain, rather than tipping the large stone out or using the cup to drain. The presenter notes that some nudges or “nubs” on real stones might have served to channel drainage, but in this method the nubs are optional. The same process is repeated for the other three candidates (granite, basalt, desert sand). After days, the stones shrink enough to pop out of the cups and they turn out gorgeously. In the first days, the material is still easy to carve; the granite version can be hollowed with a teaspoon, the basalt version is lower quality (as expected), and the desert sand version is described as awesome. The material can be cut with a knife in the initial days, reminiscent of ancient sarcophagi. The speaker imagines the potential for massive-scale casting and concludes with a nod to how the Incas hauled enormous stones to Machu Picchu—“in buckets.”

Climate also changes pretty radically over the course of like say ten thousand years. You know, it can shift from being extremely hot to extremely cold. You can really go down a deep rabbit hole if you read about ice ages. So interesting. That's That that that how much Earth's climate has changed and even where the where the magnetically where the poles are have has shifted over time.

Conditions for rapid fossilization have been found, challenging the idea of deep time processes. Rapidly decaying jellyfish fossils have been discovered worldwide, posing a conundrum for evolutionary scientists. Rock formations can occur quickly, as seen in the clock in the rock event in Washington, USA. The flood could have buried plants and animals en masse, creating fossil graveyards like the Messel pit in Germany. Laboratory experiments have successfully replicated natural fossils in just 24 hours, showing that under the right conditions, fossils can form rapidly.

To demonstrate resonance, a wine glass will be vibrated until it breaks. First, a microphone connected to an oscilloscope will determine the glass's vibration frequency. That frequency will then be set on a signal generator, amplified, and played through a speaker. A strobe light will slow down the motion, as the glass will be moving more than 400 times per second. As the vibrations intensify, the glass will move more and more until it breaks.

There are rocks and crystals that resemble meat, and geological formations that look like humanoid giants. Petrification turns organic matter into stone, as seen in ancient Greek and biblical stories. Giants are found in various cultures, suggesting some truth to their existence. Water can petrify objects by soaking in and solidifying them. Fossils like the Boreaalapelta dinosaur are perfectly preserved due to this process. Mountains and islands with humanoid shapes may actually be petrified giants from the great flood. Giant bones have been recovered, but they are petrified Nephilim bodies. These giants were described as 450 feet tall, much larger than the Statue of Unity in India. Once petrified, they could be mistaken for mountains.

Speaker 0 describes uranium water bottles from the 1920s, explaining that you would pour water in and drink it the next day because the uranium would turn it into spring water and into sulfur, claiming “that’s radium and uranium is sulfur.” He then says he decided to test something with food. He put bananas in the uranium water bottle to see what would happen to food. He observed that the uranium water bottles preserve food for up to a month; bananas usually change quickly, but when placed in the bottle, the banana stayed yellow permanently for three weeks. He then left the experiment running, not touching it. After six weeks, the banana developed only a pinch of mold on top and began turning black dots and other signs, but he ate the banana anyway. He says the banana became radioactive and “off the charts” on the Geiger counter, with energy levels described as cranked up. He then ponders what radiation is and notes that humans are radioactive beings, suggesting that perhaps we were meant to consume certain things to bring energy back, but governments have changed this narrative with a scare story. He mentions a government story where a man drank radium water and allegedly his jaw fell off. He emphasizes that this is “no joke” and claims it was just one person, while thousands of others were reportedly doing it. He adds another claim about the imagery used in newspapers: the photo of the man whose jaw supposedly fell off was not him; it was a different person with a disabling disease, used to scare people.

The CO2 levels are being measured inside a mask. Initially, the reading is at 1,367. The levels quickly rise, passing 2,000, then 3,786, and then exceeding 5,000, which is considered a toxic level. The CO2 concentration continues to climb rapidly, reaching 7,000 and then 8,000 parts per million inside the mask. The CO2 levels go so high that the measuring device can no longer register them.

This video explores the study of sound called Cymatics, which reveals the geometric shapes created by different sounds. By placing sand, water, or oil on a flat plate and playing sound beneath it, these shapes become visible. The shapes resemble various interesting things and even ancient religious symbols. It is suggested that the ancients may have known about the invisible architecture of sound. To learn more, search for Cymatics.

I grew up learning about fossils forming over millions of years, but now I question that. Dead fish don't usually become fossils because they float or get eaten quickly. It's possible that a giant catastrophe, like the biblical flood, could have buried creatures rapidly and formed fossils quickly. Evolutionary researchers are starting to consider catastrophic explanations for fossil formation, like finding animals fossilized in the middle of specific activities. For example, a fish swallowing another fish or a horseshoe crab with visible tracks in the sediment it was traveling along. These fossils suggest rapid burial and preservation.

Mixing ground cloves, calcium carbonate, bentonite clay, and kaolin clay creates a powerful tooth powder that can remineralize enamel to address early cavity signs.

I used the randomization function with the Cladney plate from the Centre For Life in Newcastle. They have an incredible science center run by amazing people, so make sure to visit them.

A crystal is formed from molecules creating a unit cell, which embodies a unique identity. This unit cell can be seen as having a "soul," drawing in its own replication. In 1961, I discovered that applying sound to crystals during growth could enhance their development. When the correct note is sounded, the crystal grows symmetrically, indicating a life force at work. This process initiates the formation of the crystal, which grows in a right-handed spiral until it completes its life cycle. Once finished, the crystal leaves behind remnants of its growth. To revive the crystal, simply breathe on it, as breath reinitiates the vibrations that brought it into existence.

Speaker 0 says they have decided to build a men in their backyard. They report one recipe as “proven” and “rock solid,” claiming it “creates stone.” The binder they describe is a mix of water glass (sodium silicate) and pine ash. They state that although the material looks gray, there is “not a single gram of Portland cement” in it, and that the gray color comes from the wood ash. Speaker 0 is considering making it 9 to 10 meters tall (about 30 feet) and asks whether that height would be tall enough. They note that at present it does not reach their knees and reference “here it is,” indicating they are showing it.