reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I gotta be careful the way I say this. 'To they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza.' 'I mean, that that's and I'm I don't use that term lightly. Okay?' 'They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there.' 'Okay?' 'And, honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge.' 'They do.' 'The the there is they this idea that they need to have a true truce or a peace treaty, that's morally after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.' This excerpt centers on warnings about ethnic cleansing, removal of residents, revenge, and a controversial view on truces or peace treaties amid violence.

Speaker 1's initial reaction to the October 7th Hamas attack was disbelief and prayer, anticipating a disastrous Israeli revenge. During a November 9th rally, an unaffiliated individual yelled "death to Jews." Speaker 1 confronted the person, stating they didn't represent the group and then addressed the crowd, condemning the statement as antisemitic. Speaker 1 believes antisemitism is unjust. The speaker stated that the fight for Palestinian freedom and the fight against antisemitism are interconnected, because injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

You don't rape Jewish women, decapitate Jewish babies, and execute Jewish men, and think you're gonna get away for it. You're not gonna get away. As Israel has demonstrated, you're gonna die for it. And that's exactly what you deserve. And that's my view. The way you treat other human beings, these are subhuman monsters. That's what they are. They're called terrorists. It doesn't even seem to matter anymore. Oh, Hamas. Sounds like a food. Oh, man, pass the Hamas. No, I don't think so. No other country in the world, none, is gonna tell Israel what to do, how to defend itself and its people. Period.

Speaker 1, a 22-year-old Palestinian named Esther Karam, proudly supports Hamas and criticizes those she perceives as white supremacists. She questions the use of terms like "terrorist" and asks if people are aware of the suffering Palestinians have endured for 75 years. Speaker 0 mentions that several governments recognize Hamas as terrorists and discusses recent events in Gaza. Speaker 1 accuses white reporters of bias and questions the motives behind their reporting. The conversation becomes heated, with Speaker 1 bringing up race and religion. Speaker 0 expresses confusion and Speaker 1 ends by expressing her support for Palestine and making a hateful remark.

A Jew goes undercover at a free Palestine rally to understand their perspective. Some attendees blame Jews for the problem and want them to go to hell. The rally calls for a free Palestine, but the Jew wonders where the Jews would go. There is a discussion about the treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals in Gaza. The Jew questions why there is a basis for Israel to exist as a homeland when other groups don't have one. The Jew's family is from Afghanistan, a predominantly Muslim country, but they acknowledge they can't claim Israel.

The speakers recount a visit to sites in Iran connected to Israeli airstrikes on civilian residential areas. They describe finding tangible remnants of the destruction and narrate specific fatalities and damages as evidence of the impact on civilians. - Speaker 0 explains that they visited locations where Israel bombed civilian residential buildings and claims that often an entire neighborhood was bombed to kill a single civilian scientist. They mention uncovering children’s shoes and a toddler’s car seat among the rubble, and warn that “another war is coming.” - Speaker 1 describes a residence where an air hostess lived and was killed, noting that she is pictured with her mother and father. They report three children were killed in the bombing by Israel against Iran. They point to a little lamp from a child’s room, children’s shoes, and children’s clothing, and mention a toy that had been in the room; they state that more toys existed but were removed. They display wall paintings and a teacup described as part of a little girl’s room. They label the situation and the presence of these objects as representative of “Zionism” and say, “This is what it means for the people of the Middle East. They transplanted this foreign entity, this cancer on our borders, and it ends lives of hundreds of thousands, if not millions.” - Speaker 2 discusses Mister Bakui’s house, noting that he and his wife and two children were killed in the Israeli missile attack. They describe the site as having once been a five-story building, and acknowledge that some neighbors were killed as well. They indicate uncertainty about the exact number of people who died and invite questions and photo opportunities. They confirm the name “Mister Bakui” (also spelled “Bob Kui” in discussion) and state that the only remaining part of the five-story building is this section. They describe extensive damage to the building and the neighboring structure, including many windows and the upper portion behind them. They note that, compared to a month earlier, when the area was a mess with rubble and debris, it has now been cleaned. - Speaker 1 asks if they can go inside, and Speaker 2 agrees, with the caveat to be careful with footwear due to debris and cleanliness.

The speaker is asked if they support Hamas killing 700 Israelis, including children, and kidnapping children. They respond by saying that the question is framed to make them look bad. They clarify that they do not support the United States, but they believe that the Israeli government is the real terrorist. The speaker is then asked a yes or no question about supporting the 700, but their response is not provided in the transcript.

Some individuals interviewed believe Hamas are freedom fighters, not terrorists, and are resisting occupation and fighting for their land. One person called the Hamas invasion of Israel on October 7th "a beacon of hope." Another stated the continued existence of Israel is a war crime. One interviewee expressed doubt that Hamas was responsible for the invasion and admitted to needing more information to comment. Another found the unverified reporting of "40 beheaded babies" disgusting.

The speaker states their love for Jews and Israel has nothing to do with the question of whether people are killing or murdering a hundred children a day. Another person calls the speaker a terrorist.

Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 supports Hamas, noting Speaker 0 is wearing a Hamas headband. Speaker 0 confirms support for Hamas and states they would join them, just as Speaker 1 would join the IDF. Speaker 0 says they would put a bullet in every soldier's head, clarifying they mean Zionists, not Jews, and that "real Jews" are elsewhere. Speaker 1 states that the IDF includes Jews and Muslims, but Speaker 0 claims there are no Muslims in the IDF, or if there are, they are hypocrites and traitors to the Muslim Ummah. Speaker 1 asks where the Muslim homeland is, and Speaker 0 replies it is all around the world and that Muslims will take over the world and implement Sharia law, which Speaker 0 supports.

I am Anath Murad from Israel, speaking on behalf of the Jewish people. In Israel, we have a unique way of doing things, often blaming Palestinians for our own actions. We have a history of controversial incidents, like the bombing of the King David Hotel and the flotilla to Gaza. It's better for us if people remain ignorant about these events. On a personal note, my sister is considered crazy because she refuses to be a soldier.

In Israel, the culture is described as fascist, with leftist views being seen as dangerous. Palestinians express a desire for peaceful coexistence. Visiting Tolerance Square in Jerusalem revealed racism and genocidal rhetoric against Palestinians. Interviews with Israelis and settlers showed support for genocide and ethnic cleansing, even when on camera. The situation was shocking. Translation: The culture in Israel is described as fascist, with leftist views being viewed as dangerous. Palestinians express a desire for peaceful coexistence. Visiting Tolerance Square in Jerusalem revealed racism and genocidal rhetoric against Palestinians. Interviews with Israelis and settlers showed support for genocide and ethnic cleansing, even when on camera. The situation was shocking.

Speaker 0: "What message do you want to give to the far right people? The message I wanna give to the far right people is we're here to take over your country. You can't stop us. You can try, but we're here to uphold Sharia law and yeah. That's it."

Today, I want to remind everyone that hiding behind a supposed desire to defend the Palestinians and taking to the streets to protest is nothing more than anti-Semitism. Let's call it what it truly is. That's all I have to say.

Speaker 0 argues that what is happening in Gaza is a ritual sacrifice. She notes that Israel is besieging and bombarding Gaza and acknowledges disturbing videos seen on social media, but contends that the truth is far more disturbing than the common description of events. She claims that throughout human history, civilizations have practiced ritual sacrifice before war, citing the Aztecs (temples with thousands of human skulls and mass murder of enemies in public) and the Phoenicians/Carthaginians (child sacrifice), with Romans also practicing human sacrifice by parading enemies through Rome and then strangling them at the Temple of Jupiter after a triumph. She states that this is sacrifice, though not always labeled as such. The central question she raises is why such sacrifices occurred in these civilizations and why, she says, Israel is doing something similar in Gaza today. She emphasizes that 47% of Gaza’s population is 18 years old, so the majority of those killed are children, calling this a striking and blatant aspect of the situation. She asserts that the world can clearly see what is happening in Gaza, and that the Israelis seemingly want the world to hate them. She notes widespread protests around the world against Israel’s actions in Palestine and argues that if Israel wanted to achieve its aims, there would be more effective, secret methods (for example, poisoning water or air to cause cancers), which could eliminate Gaza’s population over 20–30 years without public discussion. Instead, she claims, Israel chooses to do this openly to provoke global outrage. The speaker contends that this is intentional, designed to create the ultimate taboo—disgust and contention that unite the world against Israel. She connects this to a belief in extreme forms of Jewish eschatology, suggesting that some in the Israeli government want to accelerate an end-times scenario in which Israel fights the entire world with God’s help. She uses a Chinese military analogy: fighting with a river behind your back, where forcing an army to retreat to a dangerous river leads to a surge of energy to destroy the enemy. She equates the river to the taboo of killing children, arguing that there is no exit for Israel—either they go all the way or the world destroys them. She concludes by noting that online, this narrative is circulating globally and causing trouble everywhere.

Speaker 0 says this is “the closest thing to the Holocaust” that any of them have lived through. They claim that now “Bibi” and the Israeli hard right government have a mandate to “ethnically cleanse Gaza,” emphasizing that they do not use the term lightly. Speaker 0 says the government is “talking about basically removing 2.5 million people” from Gaza and suggests it has a mandate to seek “justice and revenge.” They reject the idea that Israel needs a truce or a peace treaty, calling it “morally crap,” and reference “women and children be[ing] burned alive and dragged to the streets.” They then state there are “serious questions,” and add that their “pattern recognition” over the last five years has “become pretty short.”

Hamas agreed to a ceasefire. Israel should go in, destroy them and their infrastructure. Americans should kill those holding Americans. The speaker believes Israel is the terrorist, killing Palestinians with American tax dollars. The other speaker accuses them of being heartless and soulless, referencing Holocaust Remembrance Day. The conversation ends with accusations of hate and being a crime against humanity. Translation: Hamas agreed to a ceasefire. Israel should go in and destroy them and their infrastructure. Americans should kill those holding Americans. The speaker believes Israel is the terrorist, killing Palestinians with American tax dollars. The other speaker accuses them of being heartless and soulless, referencing Holocaust Remembrance Day. The conversation ends with accusations of hate and being a crime against humanity.

As an American Jew deeply involved in Judaism, I had a profound experience when I visited Palestinians in the West Bank. It reminded me of the Jim Crow South, witnessing people living without rights, citizenship, or freedom of movement. They endure a harsh military legal system. While I don't agree with Mifda, who supports violence, it's important to acknowledge what Ilhan Omar said: people should see the situation for themselves. I've never met anyone who hasn't been transformed by such an experience. It's similar to visiting SNCC during the civil rights movement and dismissing them based on connections or anti-white sentiments.

The speaker was asked if they believed students protesting were motivated by anti-Semitism or horror at the Gaza slaughter. The speaker dismissed the idea of students being driven by horror and refused to continue the conversation if it was being recorded.

The speaker was asked how many civilians have been killed in Gaza. The speaker responded, "Who gives a shit? Okay." The speaker then stated, "Children grow up to be Arabs."

The speaker expresses a strong opinion that Israel should destroy the Gaza Strip and anyone supporting Hamas. They also criticize Joe Biden and believe that Barack Obama is the real president. They argue that open borders could allow Hamas sleeper cells to enter the country and harm innocent people. The speaker strongly opposes peace with Islam, calling it a satanic death cult. They suggest blowing up the Dome of the Rock to rebuild the Third Temple. They mention a holocaust survivor being kidnapped and criticize the corrupt government. The transcript ends abruptly.

A question is raised about “the river for Israel.” The response: “The river is a taboo.” The worst thing you can do in modern society is “killing children.” There’s no exit for Israel: “You either go all the way or the world comes and destroys you anyway.” It’s noted that if you go online, Israelis go around the world and cause trouble everywhere. “They’re going to start fights. They shout death to the Arabs on public buses in the Western world.” It’s claimed this is intentional, that they want to unite themselves by dividing the world, by angling the world.

Take off the scarf, it's a terrorist symbol. I won't. Do you want to kill Jews? It represents PLO. I'm an attorney. What's your name? Mustafa. Last name? Mohammed. Israel is the only state. Free Palestine is terrorism. We're just delivering Uber Eats. You're blocking traffic. Say something original. It's your lifestyle. You can find me if you want.

The speaker describes their past as an “extremist, Islamist, fundamentalist” who “would only vote left,” saying they saw left-leaning politicians as “very stupid,” with “no values and no principles to begin with.” They also claim they feared conservatives because conservatives “come with principle,” which the speaker says “not someone they can brainwash,” while the left could be influenced. They argue that “Islamic extremist” views align with voting for Democrats, claiming there is “dare you to find one Islamic extremist that votes for Donald Trump. Never do it.” The speaker says extremists give their votes to “leftists” who, in their description, “run around in pride parades,” and who they associate with promoting acceptance of gays, homosexuals, and transgenders—while the speaker claims Islamic extremists are “against” those groups. The speaker contrasts this with what they say Islamic extremists want the left to focus on: “the climate,” “abortion,” and “go, go, kill yourselves.” They cite “Omar” as an example, saying she is “fighting for abortion rights” under “My body, my choice,” and then claim, “Would she have an abortion? Never. Never. Would she kill a Muslim in her stomach? Never.” The speaker frames this as part of the “fundamentalist and jihadi agenda for America,” concluding that “The future of America has to be Muslim.”

Speaker says 'the Israeli hard right government has a mandate' and that 'they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza' by 'removing 2,500,000 people from there.' They claim 'they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge' and that a peace treaty would be 'morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.' The speaker notes, 'The whole country is a fortress,' and that 'I've been to that Gaza border' where 'you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with AR-15 or automatic machine gun.' They claim 'the last nine months, Israel is on the brink of civil war' with protests against Netanyahu for redefining the constitution; now 'Netanyahu has emergency government and mandate to lead.' They ask, 'Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hour?'