reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Theo Von interviews Danny McBride about his career, life, and the fourth season of The Righteous Gemstones on HBO, along with memories from Vice Principals and Eastbound and Down. McBride confirms this will be the last Gemstones season and discusses how collaboration, casting, and writing shaped the show. He recalls independent filmmaking, highlighting Fist Foot Way, which he wrote and directed with Jody Hill. They shot it for about 70 thousand dollars without SAG, with friends filling the crew, and with a belief that a self‑made project could reach audiences despite industry gatekeepers. He notes the 90s healthy independent film scene as an inspiration and explains how technology has made indie work easier in theory, yet riskier in practice today. He praises Steve Little, who joined Eastbound and Down, describing Little’s genuineness and fearlessness, and explains how casting can breathe life into a character beyond the original plan. He recalls audition tapes and intuition playing a role in casting, and acknowledges the hard work actors endure on set and in tight timing. The conversation moves to Charleston life, family, and moving from Los Angeles to give his kids room to roam. He describes choosing Charleston to give his children independence, riding bikes, and enjoying water and friends. He discusses his wife, his daughter’s humor on set, and her fascination with fake blood, and his son’s interest in lacrosse, helped by Tony Cavalero. He reflects on his Southern upbringing, puppet‑ministry mother, and a father who worked in the Prison system, sharing stories of a prison alarm, a ghost tour joke, and other childhood memories. He also recounts early mischievous projects and a nostalgia for video stores before streaming, including Blockbuster. He speaks about social media, saying he avoids it but recognizes its potential to spark dialogue when you create content, not merely post. He emphasizes that boundary‑pushing comedy can set trends, while acknowledging backlash. He remembers meeting Steve Little, Spade, and other collaborators as part of the fun of making shows with friends, and he explains his approach to crew, hospitality, and treating the crew like family. He notes a Hurricane Helena shoot that tested their resolve and discusses closing Gemstones with a sense of finality. He ends by expressing gratitude for his team, looking forward to a break, and hinting at future ideas, including Sinkhole Baby, a concept he riffs on in a playful, story‑driven way.

From a boy who drew in the margins of his textbooks to a man who would reshape entertainment, Walt Disney's life is a study in building a personal myth and a global brand. His childhood was defined by an aggressively controlling father, Elias Disney, whose beatings and harsh discipline left Walt with a yearning to control his own world. A young Walt kept nightmares about a brutal newspaper route and, later, his father's anger, driving him toward raw ingenuity. He describes a moment when he held his father's hands as the elder cried, breaking the cycle of violence. At seventeen he joined the Red Cross as an ambulance driver in World War I, then returned to pursue art rather than a jelly factory job his father favored. In Kansas City he designed his own curriculum, working nonstop as a cartoonist, awaiting the chance to move to Hollywood with Ub Iwerks and begin creating a new industry. Hollywood offered the chance to build and codify his own system. He created a culture centered on relentless refinement, a concept later described as an obsession with excellence. He designed his own education, hiring nights classes with cartoonists and forming a practical curriculum that combined art, storytelling, sound, and color. He pursued a relentless work ethic: a boyish ideal of becoming the best at animation, not just a craftsman. He partnered with Ub Iwerks, launched a string of projects, and after losing control of Oswald the Lucky Rabbit, left for California with a new plan and a belief that a single character could anchor a transformative studio. The birth of Mickey Mouse happened on a train ride back from that setback, when a mouse sketched in his notebook would become the studio's defining icon. Steamboat Willie's debut and Snow White's financing marked the moment Disney proved a new business model could sustain a creative venture. He mortgaged his home, sold his car, and borrowed against everything to fund animation ahead of its time. He refused to surrender IP or control to middlemen, and he built a system—Disney University, a story department, and a devoted crew—that treated quality as a moat. Later, World War II shifted the studio toward government films, and Disneyland rose as his lifelong dream: a fully controlled, immersive world that would fuse entertainment, engineering, and merchandising into one living project.

The opening shot of Star Wars Episode IV redefined filmmaking with innovative technology like the Dystralex camera rig. Today, AI advancements raise concerns about job security for visual effects artists, as companies like Google and OpenAI develop sophisticated video generation systems. Rob Bredow highlights the importance of blending old and new techniques, citing Jurassic Park's groundbreaking use of CGI alongside traditional methods. Recent projects like Indiana Jones and The Mandalorian showcase how artists leverage AI and real-time virtual production. Bredow emphasizes artist-driven innovation, asserting that collaboration between technology and creativity will continue to shape the future of filmmaking.

In this conversation, Rich Roll interviews Ed Catmull, co-founder of Pixar and former president of Walt Disney Animation Studios. Catmull discusses the unique culture of collaboration at Pixar, which has set a standard for creative workplaces globally. He emphasizes the importance of harnessing the energy and desire of individuals to foster creativity and continuous learning, highlighting how embracing failure can lead to growth. Catmull reflects on his upbringing in a supportive environment and his early aspirations influenced by figures like Walt Disney and Albert Einstein. He shares insights from his time at the University of Utah, where he was surrounded by pioneering thinkers in computer science and graphics, which laid the groundwork for his future endeavors. A significant part of Pixar's success is attributed to developing talent in-house and establishing a culture of feedback, where ideas are prioritized over individual egos. Catmull introduces the concept of the "Brain Trust," a group designed to provide constructive feedback without overriding the director's vision. He notes that this approach allows for honest discussions and encourages vulnerability among team members. Catmull also discusses the impact of Steve Jobs on Pixar, particularly his understanding of the creative process and the importance of not imposing authority in collaborative settings. He recounts how Jobs refrained from attending certain meetings to avoid altering the dynamic, allowing for more open communication. The conversation touches on the challenges of maintaining creativity in a rapidly changing technological landscape. Catmull believes that creativity is essential not only in the arts but in problem-solving across all fields. He advocates for a culture that values learning from mistakes and encourages individuals to seek diverse perspectives for better decision-making. Ultimately, Catmull emphasizes the importance of treating people well and fostering an environment where everyone feels valued and empowered to contribute, which he believes is crucial for both personal and organizational success.

Two 20th‑century giants, Pablo Picasso and Walt Disney, illuminate how new technologies and new individual visions collided to change what we see. In Paul Johnson’s Creators, the essay compares their lives and legacies, showing how both embraced novelty from opposite shores of the cultural map, yet with strikingly different drives. Picasso, born in Spain and largely self‑taught, built a prodigious, restless output and a personality described as a ‘monster of assured egoism.’ He marketed himself early, outsourced no discipline, and turned personal pursuit into a relentless creative engine, even as his relationships and ethics drew intense critique. He thrived on disruption, relished competition, and preferred Paris’s old‑world studios to Hollywood’s new frontier. Disney, by contrast, emerges as a midwestern innovator who embraced America’s entrepreneurial tempo and cutting‑edge tech. From farm to Kansas City, he learned to run his own business, then moved to Hollywood to chase animation’s evolving possibilities. After a bankruptcy‑scarred start, he built a collaborative studio culture with Ub Iwerks and others, translating ideas into increasingly bold films. The Oswald episode, then Mickey Mouse, shows how rapid adaptation and relentless iteration beat stronger capital. The breakthrough came with sound, color, and synchronized animation, culminating in Snow White. Disney’s work fused nature as source material with anthropomorphism, creating a powerful, enduring brand built on affection rather than shock. Paul Johnson foregrounds a central contrast: Picasso’s intense, sometimes cruel self‑absorption versus Disney’s outward, audience‑centered empathy. The artist as aesthetic entrepreneur achieves fame through solitary genius; the innovator as showman and builder wins through teams, capital discipline, and taste for risk. The takeaway is not a verdict but a framework: lasting impact often depends on timing, collaboration, and the ability to translate nature into publicly lovable forms. Disney’s later expansion into Disneyland and a global media empire embodies this arc, whereas Picasso’s later years reveal how immense talent can coexist with personal turmoil and insecurity. The episode links their trajectories into a broader meditation on creative power. Across the book and episode, the lesson is clear: imagination rules when it informs and endears. The narrative also highlights the value of studying biographies to understand how great creators balance focus, virtue, and cost. The discussion features references to Paul Johnson’s works, including Creators and Heroes, and to Les Schwab’s Autobiography as sources that shaped the analysis.

Matt Damon and Ben Affleck join Joe Rogan in a wide‑ranging conversation about how the film industry has evolved with streaming, technology, and changing audience habits. They reflect on the shift from traditional theatrical releases to platform‑driven models, noting how streaming has influenced budget decisions, risk tolerance, and the way stories are structured. They discuss the role of data and algorithms in shaping editing and pacing, the tension between artistic ambition and the realities of distribution, and how creators collaborate with studios to align incentives with performance. The pair emphasize the importance of environment and team culture on set, arguing that a motivated, cohesive crew and fair treatment of below‑the‑line workers can elevate a project beyond its budget, while also acknowledging the need for mechanisms like bonuses to recognize contributions and sustain long‑term collaboration. They touch on the balance between spectacle and character, arguing that audiences respond to genuine human moments and that great filmmaking often hinges on listening, improvisation, and trust among actors, directors, and crew. The actors offer perspectives on how technology might reshape storytelling, clarifying that while automation and AI tools will become useful, they won’t replace the uniquely human layer of lived experience and emotion that drives compelling performances. The conversation also ventures into broader cultural topics, including the pressures of fame, the changing landscape of media criticism, and the value of long, thoughtful conversations in an era of short‑form content. They reflect on the challenge of maintaining artistic integrity while navigating economic pressures, the importance of mentorship and collaboration, and the ongoing debate about how best to compensate creative labor in a rapidly shifting entertainment economy. The dialogue ends on a note about mentorship, gratitude for creative partners, and a shared optimism that purpose, teamwork, and purposeful risk can sustain meaningful work even as the industry evolves.

In this episode of "Armchair Expert," Dax Shepard hosts Tom Hanks and Robert Zemeckis, discussing Hanks' career and their latest collaboration on the film *Pinocchio*, where Hanks plays Gepetto. The conversation highlights Hanks' warmth and humor, with Shepard and Zemeckis sharing anecdotes about their experiences in the film industry. Hanks reflects on his childhood, mentioning that his name, Dax, was inspired by a character from a racy novel. He shares memories of pop culture from his youth, emphasizing how certain commercials and shows have stuck with him over the years. The discussion shifts to the pressures of late-night talk shows, where Hanks notes the difference between genuine conversations and the performance aspect of those appearances. The trio delves into the nature of nostalgia in their careers, with Hanks recalling his time working with Paul Newman on *Road to Perdition*. He describes Newman as a humble and generous presence on set, emphasizing the importance of the "hang" or camaraderie among cast and crew during productions. Hanks expresses admiration for Zemeckis, praising his innovative approach to filmmaking and storytelling. As they discuss *Pinocchio*, Hanks highlights the film's legacy and the challenges of adapting such a beloved story. He notes the significance of the original film in Disney's history and the advancements in animation technology since then. The conversation touches on themes of authenticity in storytelling and the evolving landscape of Hollywood, particularly regarding representation and societal issues. Hanks shares insights on the importance of creating relatable narratives that resonate with audiences, reflecting on his role in *Philadelphia* and the impact of that film on public perception of LGBTQ+ issues. He emphasizes the need for films to invite broader audiences into conversations about important topics rather than alienating them. The episode concludes with a light-hearted exchange about personal anecdotes and experiences in the industry, showcasing Hanks' genuine nature and the bond between the three men. The discussion encapsulates the joy of storytelling, the significance of collaboration, and the enduring impact of film on culture.

In this episode of the Tim Ferriss Show, Tim interviews Kevin Costner, a renowned filmmaker and storyteller. Costner discusses his upbringing in Lynwood, California, and his experiences in a small schoolhouse, which he found limiting. He reflects on his supportive parents and their involvement in his childhood, contrasting it with others' experiences of parental absence. Costner shares how his conservative Baptist upbringing shaped his worldview, initially leading him to adopt his parents' views without question. Costner recounts his early struggles with self-identity and the challenges of growing up small and underweight, which affected his confidence. He describes a pivotal moment when he decided to pursue acting after a near-fatal car accident on the way to an audition for "Rumplestiltskin." This decision marked the beginning of his journey into acting, where he faced competition from established actors. He discusses his breakthrough role in "The Big Chill," emphasizing that the experience was more significant than the part itself. Costner reflects on the entrepreneurial spirit of acting, likening it to the willingness to take risks without guarantees of success. He shares insights on the importance of preparation for roles, particularly in demanding scenes, and his collaborative relationship with directors like Oliver Stone during "JFK." The conversation shifts to Costner's directorial debut with "Dances with Wolves," detailing his partnership with writer Michael Blake. Costner highlights the challenges of bringing the story to life and the importance of authenticity in storytelling. He expresses pride in the film's impact and its exploration of Native American culture. Costner also discusses his recent project, "The Explorers Guild," co-created with John Baird. The book combines elements of classic adventure storytelling with modern themes, aiming to resonate with readers of all ages. Costner emphasizes the importance of creating meaningful art and the joy of sharing stories that connect with others. In rapid-fire questions, Costner shares his admiration for historical figures like Mark Twain and Steven Spielberg, his thoughts on documentaries, and his struggles with discipline in fitness. He concludes with a message about the value of storytelling and the hope that "The Explorers Guild" inspires readers to share their experiences. The episode encapsulates Costner's journey as an artist, his reflections on life, and his commitment to storytelling.

From Instagram to a movie, a manifesto unfolds. Rich Roll reconnects with Jay Duplass after Jay follows him, and a conversation about manifesting a dream leads to a collaboration where Rich would star in a new film. They recall the ethos that carried them from Puffy Chair days: make movies, not meetings. The plan was audacious and lean—shoot a feature in Baltimore on a micro-budget with a tiny crew, using free locations, and letting the city carry the story. Jay and his brother Mark built a career by saying no to long meetings and yes to action, a philosophy that shaped their independent films and the way they approach casting, location scouting, and financing. Together they pursued an authentic, emotionally grounded cinema that could still find theatrical release. The conversation pivots to sobriety and creative courage. Michael Strassner shares a Baltimore origin, experimenting with alcohol and drugs from a young age, a suicide attempt that ended with a belt breaking, and a first step into sobriety sparked by an AA meeting. He describes fearing sobriety might erase his humor, and the relief of discovering that honesty and vulnerability could fuel performance. The directors say his journey became the heart of the film, and their collaboration grew from shared vulnerability and trust. They discuss daily routines, meetings, and service as pillars of life—habits that underpin their artistry. The interview frames sobriety not as a constraint but as the engine that enables a truthful, funny, and compassionate story, and a world where healing and humor coexist on screen. The pair discuss making their new film in Baltimore and the on-set realities that shaped the final cut. Filming at night on city streets, a $45 permit for a month, avoiding LA’s costs, and recruiting a crew willing to work for minimal pay were essential. A pivotal on-stage scene initially failed, requiring months of reconception and a new take that carried the emotional arc and romance. Festival audiences and IFC distribution are cited as proof that intimate, character-driven cinema can thrive. The conversation emphasizes serving the audience, building a collaborative village, and balancing obsession with humility. They end with a hopeful call: keep making good days, stay true to your vision, and don’t leave before the miracle.