reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The president stated the Pentagon announced they would be accepting a Qatari jet to be used as Air Force One. He said it’s a great thing and that Qatar gave $5,100,000,000,000 worth of investment in addition to the jet. He then accused an NBC reporter of trying to change the subject and called him a terrible reporter who isn’t smart enough. He said Brian Roberts and the people who run NBC should be investigated for how terribly they run the network, calling the reporter a disgrace and refusing to answer any more questions from him.

The speaker claims Donald Trump was expected to receive a red carpet welcome, but instead, the Saudis rolled out a purple carpet for him. The speaker states that purple is the color of royalty. The speaker concludes that this symbolizes Trump is still winning.

The speaker reports aggressive military actions and ongoing negotiations with Iran. They state that they have “destroyed a lot of additional targets today” and that “the navy's gone” and “the air force is gone,” while noting that “we know that” and that they “destroyed many, many targets today” in what was “a big day.” Negotiations are described as both direct and indirect, with emissaries involved as well as direct dealings. On the diplomatic side, the speaker says Iran “agreed to send eight votes two days ago, and then they added another two, so it was 10 votes,” and that “today, they gave us as a tribute I don't know. Can't define it exactly, but they gave us, I think out of a sign of respect, 20 boats of oil.” These vessels would be moving “through the Hormoz Strait” and would begin “starting tomorrow morning over the next couple of days.” The speaker claims to be “doing extremely well in that negotiation,” while acknowledging uncertainty in dealings with Iran: “you never know with Iran because we negotiate with them and then we always have to blow them up.” Historical references are cited to explain current posture: the “b two bombers” and the termination of the “Iran nuclear deal done by Barack Hussein Obama, probably the worst deal we've ever done as a country, of the dumbest deals we've ever done.” The speaker asserts that the deal was terminated, otherwise “right now, they'd have a nuclear weapon,” and that an attack with the B-2 bombers was used to stop them from having nuclear capability. The speaker suggests a possible future deal with Iran but notes it is not certain: “I think we'll make a deal with them. Pretty sure. But it's possible we won't.” Regarding regime change, the speaker asserts that “we've had regime change, if you look already, because the one regime was decimated, destroyed. They're all dead.” The “next regime is mostly dead,” and the “third regime” involves “a whole different group of people” than any before. The speaker contends that this constitutes regime change and characterizes the first regime as “really bad, really evil,” which is claimed to be “done.” The second regime is described as “appointed, and they're gone.” The third group is described as “much more reasonable,” leading the speaker to say that regime change appears to be achieved and may be automatic.

The speaker states they want to clarify whether an offer was made to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to send a rocket to rescue astronauts sooner. According to the speaker, SpaceX offered to return astronauts earlier, even though they were only supposed to be in space for eight days but have been there for almost ten months. The speaker claims SpaceX could have brought the astronauts back after a few months, but the offer was made to the Biden administration and rejected for political reasons.

Speaker 0 denies the claim of owning a private jet and finds it ridiculous. Speaker 1 challenges this statement, presenting an article stating that the John Kerry family private jet was sold due to accusations of climate hypocrisy. Speaker 0 clarifies that while their wife owned a plane, it was not theirs. The conversation ends there.

A member of the European Parliament from France reportedly believes the U.S. no longer represents the values of the Statue of Liberty and wants it returned to France. The question is posed whether President Trump will send the Statue of Liberty back. In response, it is asserted that the U.S. will absolutely not send the Statue of Liberty back. The unnamed French politician is advised to remember that the French are not speaking German because of the United States, and they should be grateful to the U.S.

$100 billion in cash was flown to Tehran on US Air Force planes without congressional knowledge. The speaker questions the lack of investigation or impeachment over this. They suggest a possible collusion between politicians of both parties. The speaker believes God is orchestrating events.

I was Donald Trump's personal campaign photographer and I am the current editor in chief of George. I want to share an interesting coincidence with you. Did you know that Donald Trump authorized the building of a new Air Force One? It will be completed sometime after 2024. Here's the crazy part: George magazine has exclusive permission to talk about it. Now, here's where it gets even weirder. The potential Air Force One looks similar to JFK Junior's first plane. It's quite a coincidence, don't you think?

Donald Trump is allegedly accepting a $400 million aircraft from Qatar, described as a "palace in the sky." Trump stated he would be "stupid" to refuse such an offer, calling it a "great gesture." This acceptance allegedly violates the Constitution's emoluments clause, which prohibits officeholders from accepting gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval. Pam Bondi and the White House counsel see no problem with the gift, though Bondi previously lobbied for Qatar. The Air Force will purportedly accept it until Trump leaves office, then it will go to his library. The speaker claims this is designed to curry favor and influence Trump's foreign policy. Trump's children, including Jared Kushner, Don Jr., and Eric, are also allegedly receiving Qatari money through investments. The speaker contrasts this with issues faced by average Americans, such as rising air travel costs and airport safety concerns. A similar emoluments clause issue occurred during Trump's first term with Gulf nations buying floors in Trump hotels. The speaker expects a lawsuit, but anticipates the Supreme Court will delay ruling until Trump is out of office.

The plane is landing. A person asks if the president plans to take Greenland by force and about the impact of today's inflation report. Someone says they don't want to see anyone get hurt. Another person wishes the president good luck and tells him to be careful.

Speaker 0: Trump is not building a ballroom. Andrew Kerr, an architect with over twenty years of federal project experience, posted on Facebook and walked through step by step why this ballroom makes no sense. He did the math: $300,000,000 at 90,000 square feet would be about $3,333 per square foot, and he said that even luxury federal construction doesn’t usually approach $1,000 per square foot. The geometry of the renderings is nearly impossible, showing a building with a 380 by 235 foot footprint, but interior views show maybe 200 by 100 feet, which is 20,000 square feet, so that can’t exist in the same building. Construction drawings look like they were thrown together in about a week, and he suggested they were probably thrown together by Grock, or whoever’s still wandering around the White House from Doge. So the million dollar question is what is he building? The answer, he suggests, is an underground data center. Think about where they’re building. It’s not random. It’s the East Wing, where the PEOC bunker is, the tunnel systems that connect the White House to the Treasury to other federal buildings, and where all of the secure communications infrastructure lives. That’s prime underground real estate. It reminds me of Larry Ellison’s Oracle data centers in underground Jerusalem: nine stories deep, 160 feet below ground, 460,000 square feet, costing $319,000,000 per bunker. The White House is already at $300,000,000 for this “ballroom,” and it’s only climbing. Fiscally, it feels like a more apt comparison to those. Outside of architecture anomalies, the fact that this is privately funded should have been the first red flag. This is Donald Trump, the man who has spent taxpayer money on stuff that benefits him. He spent over $3,900,000,000 in taxpayer money just to make over Air Force One. Didn’t he also have Secret Service pay room bills at Mar-a-Lago? This suggests it isn’t serving him; it’s serving someone else specifically. Look at the donor list: defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Booz Allen Hamilton, tech giants like Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Palantir, crypto companies like Coinbase, Ripple, and Tether, and telecoms like T-Mobile and Comcast. These aren’t people funding a party space; these are companies with interests in government infrastructure, data, and operations. They’re funding infrastructure that directly serves them. Also, about Larry Ellison’s vision to automate the government: many tech pros talk about automating federal operations or creating a single digital platform for the government, which would require a supremely secure physical home for that system. Placing it directly under the White House would eliminate latency problems and ensure the President has direct physical control over the system’s core. Centralizing control and securing the brain of the government. It’s dystopian in many ways, and these are real developments happening worldwide. The companies funding this are buying access to integrate their systems with how the government operates, and that’s what $300,000,000 will get you. I guess.

A squadron commander from North Carolina contacted the speaker via Instagram with a surprising claim. According to the commander, a North Carolina National Guard unit loaded a C-17 aircraft full of supplies intended for hurricane victims. However, the supplies were allegedly only for a photo opportunity for Kamala Harris. The C-17 was never sent to deliver the supplies. The squadron commander, an 06, reached out to the speaker to share this information, stating the intention was always just for a photo op.

The State Department was asked if they had any concerns about the vice president's son joining the board of a Ukrainian gas company. The speaker clarified that the son is a private citizen and not a government official. When asked about the perception of conflict or cronyism, the speaker stated that there are no concerns from the State Department. They do not believe that the involvement of the vice president's son would be perceived negatively by the Russians or Ukrainians.

The speaker received messages, including from aircraft and squadron commanders, after posting a video. One squadron commander from North Carolina informed the speaker that they loaded a C-17 full of supplies for hurricane victims solely for a Kamala photo op. The C-17 was never sent. The speaker was contacted by an 06 who said the supplies were never intended to be sent.

The speaker discusses the travel arrangements of a government official who commutes between Atlanta and Washington, D.C. The official flies on a private jet every weekend, costing the American taxpayer a significant amount of money. However, the official only pays around $200 per flight, which is the commercial equivalent of the region. The speaker also mentions that the official has a security detail and other staff who accompany him, resulting in additional expenses. The speaker suggests that this arrangement seems like corruption and questions the fairness of the situation.

He owns a Boeing 727 for flying around with powerful friends like Bill Clinton.

The speaker is meeting with the secretary general and plans to send them sophisticated military equipment, for which they will be fully reimbursed. The U.S. is in for about $350 billion, while Europe is in for $100 billion, though the speaker believes Europe should contribute more. As the U.S. sends equipment, they will be reimbursed. The speaker mentions sending text pictures and files, with the European Union paying for it. The U.S. will send patriots, which are needed because Putin "bombs everybody in the evening."

Speaker 0 mentions the expensive aircraft and helicopters they have, including a $50 million airplane and a $29 million Borges helicopter. They have various types of helicopters, some of which are brand new. They question whether it is cheaper to leave the aircraft there or fill it up with gas and fly it to Pakistan or back to their country. They realize they were foolish for thinking it was cheaper to leave it there.

One speaker considers the possibility that China, India, or Pakistan might escort a ship through the Strait of Hormuz and worries about a potential direct confrontation between the United States and those countries. He notes there is no expected confrontation between Pakistan and India, highlighting an open line of communication, a good relationship, and that one of them is a mediator in negotiations. China, however, is described as a different case, with increasing parallels to what was seen between the United States and Russia in the early Cold War era. The other speaker expresses hope that the Chinese will not decide to confront the Americans over the Strait. He bluntly states that the Chinese are not friends with the United States anymore; while they have long-term economic partnership and linked economies, the current administration has been placing tariffs on China and threatening more tariffs. News reports are cited indicating that China will provide the HQ-9 air defense system, which is described as far superior to the Russian S-300, to Iran. He emphasizes these are defensive weapons, not offensive capabilities, and notes that the administration is likely to be distressed by this development. Despite the administration’s stance, the speaker asserts that providing defensive weapons to another country is something done routinely and acknowledges that this move could enhance Iran’s defensive posture. He mentions the possibility that the Chinese supply could even enable Iran to detect F-35 aircraft, though he notes uncertainty about this point. The situation is characterized as a game changer and described as a behind-the-scenes nuance that the average American might not fully understand, as well as perhaps the administration not fully grasping it. The speaker reiterates that the Chinese plan is to provide these defensive weapons to Iran, describing it as a soon-to-occur development.

Air Force One is making history, flying over the newly named Gulf of America in international waters. We're headed west to Super Bowl LIX. This is a momentous occasion; we're making America great again. This pen, by the way, is quite famous.

The speaker is asked why they won't admit that the US doesn't plan to give the money to Iran. In response, the speaker explains that they have always had the power to oversee how the funds are distributed and they have the option to withhold it if they choose to.

The discussion centers on how politicization of intelligence has manifested in different eras, comparing past and present administrations. Speaker 0 asks whether the politicized weapons claims about Iraq and the CIA’s statements in the 1990s can be compared to today’s politicization of intelligence under John Ratcliffe and Tulsi Gabbard as head of DNI, arguing it is much worse now because of the mediocrity of those in control of key agencies. Speaker 1 counters by recalling the 1980s, noting that there was significant politicization of the Soviet threat to justify Reagan’s defense buildup, and adds that this is why he testified against Robert Gates in 1991. He asserts that politicization is bad, and insists that the current situation is worse than in the past. Speaker 1 explains: “It’s Because I look at the people who are ahead of these groups. Come on. Let’s be serious.” He targets the leadership of the director of national intelligence, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the CIA, saying, “Have you ever seen a cabinet in The United States of such mediocrity, of such venality?” He emphasizes his background, stating, “I haven’t,” and that nothing compares to what is going on now, warning that “a lot of damage is being done to The United States and to the constitution of The United States and to the importance of separation of powers and the importance of rule of law and the importance of checks and balances. This is very serious stuff.” Speaker 0 attempts to steer toward historical figures like Robert Maxwell, but Speaker 1 dismisses that concern as off point, insisting he is making a point about Israel. The exchange then shifts to U.S. support for Israel, with Speaker 1 asserting that “Israel gets what it wants from The United States. It gets it from democratic presidents and from republican presidents.” He also criticizes Barack Obama for signing what he calls “that ten year $40,000,000,000 arms aid agreement,” arguing that Obama “never should have signed” it “because they treated Obama so shabbily in the first place.”

The speaker questions the attorney general about pardons for January 6th offenders and asks if she advised the president on this. The attorney general refuses to discuss conversations with the president. The speaker accuses the administration of incompetence, corruption, and cruelty, focusing on corruption. She asks if the attorney general was ever registered as an agent of a foreign principal under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The attorney general acknowledges representing Qatar for anti-human trafficking efforts related to the World Cup. The speaker accuses her of being a registered lobbyist for Qatar and not disclosing this during her Senate confirmation. The attorney general claims it was discussed in detail. The speaker asks if the attorney general advised that President Trump could accept a $400 million airplane from Qatar. The attorney general refuses to discuss advice given to the president. The speaker asks if she recused herself from that issue, and the attorney general questions the speaker's claim that the president wanted the jet because it was "pretty."

The U.S. government, through the State Department, is apparently spending $400 million in taxpayer money on "armored Tesla production units." It raises questions about potential corruption and who benefits from this deal. This contract was not initiated during the Trump administration, but rather approved under Joe Biden.