reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kevin O'Leary discusses the $355 million fine on Trump, questioning the impact on NY's reputation. He argues the case sets a dangerous precedent for developers. O'Leary emphasizes the need for better management in NY to avoid becoming unattractive to investors. He criticizes the judge's decision, highlighting the lack of financial loss and the potential consequences for entrepreneurship in America. The conversation shifts to the appeals process and the uncertainty surrounding future prosecutions in NY. O'Leary dismisses the idea of buying gold sneakers and prefers collecting watches. The interview ends with a discussion on business and branding.

New York and California are considered loser states due to high taxes and regulations. Investing in New York is discouraged, with developers looking to states like Oklahoma and West Virginia for data center projects. The shift is driven by the need for power and job creation. New York's loss is seen as Texas and Florida's gain, with Tennessee emerging as a winner state with favorable policies. The divide between winner and loser states is evident post-pandemic.

We don’t need another data center. The speaker says people don’t know the health impact, arguing that placing many facilities together “crunched” will lead to a “mass exit” and ruin the community. They emphasize that the community’s welfare should be prioritized and that decision-makers may believe they are doing what is correct, but are not pausing to pay attention to what local people are saying. The speaker concludes that they will fight for their people.

The video documents a drive through rural farmland in Indiana to a growing AI data center. The area is described as “super rural,” with miles of farmland and few signs of life until the data center lights appear, creating a noticeable intrusion in an otherwise empty landscape. The narrator notes the drive covers “30 plus miles, maybe more of nothing but just beautiful rural farmland,” and expresses strong emotion about returning to this area after a year away. As the video continues, the scenery remains rural and expansive, with mentions of semi trucks and cement trucks on the way to the site. The narrator highlights the emotional impact of the development, stating, “the first time I drove this, it genuinely made me so emotional because I haven't been this way. I haven't left town in, like a year.” The content hints at a pause in filming near a small parking lot or staging area before continuing along the corridor toward the project. A key claim is that the Meta AI data center is being built on this farmland, consuming “beautiful farmland that we will never be able to replace.” The narrator emphasizes the contrast between the large land use for the data center and the relatively small number of jobs it will create, stating that it will “only employ one to 500 people,” which the speaker finds startling. The final sentiment underscores the perceived imbalance between the considerable land impact and the limited employment opportunity, describing the situation as “pretty fucking insane.” The video ends after confirming the path to the data center and the ongoing construction.

The speaker expresses shock and disbelief over a recent decision in New York, stating it makes the state unattractive for investment. They highlight the importance of winner states with favorable policies. The conversation shifts to Governor Hochul's comments on the issue, questioning the lack of a clear victim and the legal basis for the decision. The focus is on New York's reputation and the impact on potential investments. The discussion concludes with a call for New York to address its status as a "loser state" and attract businesses.

The speaker talks about a radical left movement in New York that aims to harm them. They believe that New York is the worst and most corrupt place for this movement. The speaker emphasizes the importance of stopping their movement, which has the support of 75 million voters.

- The speaker argues that data centers are expanding globally despite claims of an energy crisis, describing this growth as dangerous and indiscriminate. Project Matador in the Texas Panhandle is highlighted as potentially the largest data center, planned up to 18,000,000 square feet (about 6,000 acres) and reportedly using up to 96,000,000,000 kilowatts of electricity per year. Conservative figures are used for illustration. Texas residential electricity use is stated as approximately 172,000,000,000 kilowatts annually, meaning Matador could consume roughly 55–65% of all Texas residential electricity, with hundreds more centers either operating, under construction, or planned in the state (87 in operation, about 135 under construction, and a pipeline of over 600 planned). - The video cites reports of data centers destroying communities nationwide and worldwide. A segment about Meta’s new AI data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana, is presented: the center is 4,000,000 square feet and 2,250 acres (roughly 70 football fields). Residents describe rising rents due to out-of-state workers, disruption to local businesses, constant noise and bright lights, and a halo over homes. The speaker notes that the area has long faced job and poverty issues, and while some view the AI center as an economic opportunity, the disruption is described as significant and ongoing. - A conservative view is attributed to the Louisiana report, followed by the speaker’s own assertion that AI data centers will drain water and energy, potentially enabling a “smart city” agenda that renders rural areas unlivable and pushes populations to cities. The speaker suggests rural communities may be targeted as part of a broader strategy. - The discussion moves to Utah, where the Stratos project is described as rivaling Matador in scale. Jason Basleronex (the speaker’s reference) describes a proposed largest hyperscale data center in Box Elder County, Utah (approximately 40,000 acres, 62 square miles), backed by Canadian billionaire Kevin O’Leary and fast-tracked by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority with Governor Spencer Cox. The public would be locked out of decision-making. The project is linked to anticipated 50% increase in CO2 emissions, polluted water, and 24/7 noise and light pollution. The implication is that the initiative operates as a military operation, with national security justification cited. - A clip from Noah B Price is cited to illustrate living near a data center: water usage of 5,000,000 gallons per day in a drought state, with residents unable to collect rainwater in some areas, constant roar, and destroyed property values. The clip is used to argue about the “AI future” and potential government abuse of technology, including references to a broad list of dystopian outcomes (social credit systems, programmable digital currency, cars controlled by tech, rural self-sufficiency eliminated, and gene-edited humans integrated with AI). The speaker suggests these are directions supported by certain tech and government actions. - The video concludes with a call for local communities to band together, elect representatives who oppose the agenda, and protect their communities as a sanctuary against the “eye of Sauron” at Palantir HQ. It frames the data-center expansion as a threat to rural living and a push toward an AI-driven, controlled future. - The message ends with an advertising note for Genesis Gold Group and a free wealth protection guide via dailypulsesilver.com, promoting gold and silver investment as a hedge.

The transcript covers a wave of community pushback against surveillance and data-center developments, highlighting how residents are challenging authorities and big tech projects in their towns. - Surveillance cameras (Flock) controversy: The piece opens with cases suggesting that what’s marketed as public safety can be misused. A poster mentions Brandon Upchurch, whose license plate 7 was misread as 2 by flock cameras, leading to a police stop at gunpoint, a K-9 release, an arrest, and jail for a crime that didn’t exist. Andrew Kaufman notes flock cameras are being destroyed so fast that police in Kentucky are withholding their locations after the devices were released and promptly destroyed. The argument is that communities don’t want to be monitored and should have right to privacy; Flock cameras are going up across towns often without public input. In Pine Plains, New York, a resident saw a flock contractor install 12 cameras without town-board approval; the cameras were not installed, but the incident exposed contract-authorization confusion. The takeaway is to stay vigilant, talk to neighbors, attend town meetings, and make clear that surveillance is not desired. - Data centers: widespread, rapid pushback across multiple communities. The broader thrust is that communities are resisting data centers due to concerns about power, water use, land, privacy, and local impacts. - Utah – Provo data center rejection: Robert Bryce reports that Provo, Utah rejected a data center project, citing no city interest and concerns about power demand. He notes 53 data-center rejections or restrictions in the U.S. in 2026 so far (more than all of 2025). The proposed load was initially five megawatts, potentially up to 50 megawatts, which would strain the Utah Municipal Power Agency’s 415-megawatt capacity. - Additional examples of pushback: A video from New Jersey shows hundreds of New Brunswick residents celebrating a protest that led to the plans being canceled. Stark County, Indiana, enacted a twelve-month moratorium on data-center construction after sustained community pressure; a public meeting featured residents opposing the project and some calling for a total ban. Northwest Indiana residents voiced alarm about Big Tech’s data-center incursions and the AI agenda, arguing it would not benefit them and would affect electricity costs. In several counties (Indiana, Georgia, Missouri, Illinois, and beyond), moratorium measures or restrictions were adopted to pause or ban new proposals, with claims that capacity issues and local concerns justify stopping projects. - Apex, North Carolina: Over 100 Apex residents packed a town hall to oppose a data center proposal, citing strained power grid, massive water usage, wildlife disruption, and industrial noise. A community organizer, Melissa Ripper, led the Protect Wake County Coalition; Natelli Investment withdrew its applications, described as a “small victory.” - Tucson: Community members organized to reject a data center proposed by Amazon, citing drought and water-use concerns; the video emphasizes that Tucson became the first city to reject a massive data center proposal due to a large local uprising and distrust of assurances about water reclamation. - Kentucky landowners’ stand against offers: Ida Huddleston and her daughter Delsia Bear rejected multimillion-dollar offers from an anonymous tech company to build a data center on their land. Huddleston declined $60,000 per acre for 71 acres; Bear declined $48,000 per acre for 463 acres. The company behind the project has not been revealed, which adds to residents’ concerns about transparency. The proposed site is Big Pond Pike in Mason County, with claims the project would create 400 full-time jobs and more than 1,500 construction jobs, though Bear says many jobs may not materialize. - Closing sentiment: The speaker argues that “they simply cannot pull the wool over the eyes of a country folk,” noting the daughter’s rejection of $22,000,000 and Ida Huddleston’s insistence on staying put to protect her community, underscoring a broader theme of local resilience and community solidarity against large-scale, opaque projects.

Governor Hochul stated on national TV that criminal aliens should be deported after NYPD officers were assaulted and after a woman was burned alive on a subway by an illegal alien. However, when Mayor Adams wants to arrest criminal aliens and use Rikers Island, Hochul allegedly tries to undermine those efforts. According to the speaker, Hochul implemented the "Green Light Law," preventing ICE and CBP officers from accessing DMV data, hindering their ability to identify individuals during traffic stops. The speaker claims that even with a warrant, New York notifies the suspect of the investigation. The speaker is calling her out for sanctuary policies.

There are serious issues in New York with Governor Hochul's plan to change the healthcare system. The Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program (CDPAP), which allows chronically ill or disabled individuals to hire caregivers, is at risk. Hochul wants to consolidate this $9 billion initiative into one financial program with Public Partnerships LLC (PPL), a Georgia-based company with no New York healthcare experience. PPL has a history of failed contracts in other states, costing them millions. There are concerns about political favors, particularly with George Grisham's union potentially gaining influence, leading to the unionization of 280,000 caregivers and the shutdown of 600 companies. This deal, already failing in other states, risks costing New York more, burdening families, and harming the economy. Even Democrats are questioning this decision.

In this video, the speaker expresses concern over a meeting between a New York attorney general and the Biden administration. They question why this meeting took place during an ongoing trial and suggest a connection to George Soros. The speaker is shocked and finds it unbelievable that the attorney general is coordinating with the Biden administration. They no longer believe innocent intentions behind the meeting.

There's a serious issue in New York with Governor Hochul's plan to overhaul the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program (CDPAP), a $9 billion initiative that allows chronically ill or disabled individuals to hire caregivers, often family members. Hochul wants to consolidate the program under a single financial intermediary, Public Partnerships LLC (PPL), a Georgia-based company with no New York healthcare experience. PPL was selected before the bidding process even began, despite numerous failed contracts and financial setbacks in other states like Pennsylvania. This move appears to benefit union interests, specifically George Grisham and 1199 SEIU, who have donated to Democratic campaigns and stand to gain from unionizing 280,000 caregivers. The change threatens to shut down 600 existing New York companies, risks higher costs, and could force families into debt. Even Democrats like Congressman Richie Torres are questioning this decision, highlighting the widespread concerns over the implementation of PPL in New York.

Truckers for Trump are refusing to drive into a state due to recent events. The city faces a $4.3 billion budget shortfall, causing businesses to leave for states like Tennessee, Florida, and Texas. This could bankrupt the state and lead to long-term consequences. The ruling is seen as an abomination with no victims, pushing patriots to stand up against those destroying the country. The situation is perceived as a boomerang effect, potentially leading to the downfall of New York.

The speaker discusses the decision to move the company's headquarters from California to Florida. They explain that the move is driven by a responsibility to shareholders and a desire to avoid funding a state government that goes against their values. The speaker also highlights the negative impact of high taxes and overburdensome regulations in California. Moving to Florida will result in significant cost savings, estimated to be at least $1 million and potentially tens of millions of dollars annually. The move will also allow the company to focus on growing the business and providing effective solutions to consumers.

Speaker 0: Growth without restraint is driving corporate takeovers of physical space, water, power, land, and communities, with costs pushed directly onto people through their electric bills, water supply, property values, and quality of life. This is framed as enabling big tech to build the backbone of the AI economy, an economy described as planning to eliminate most jobs and most futures. Speaker 0 says the AI story is widely discussed online, including on X and Instagram. Speaker 0 rejects the idea that it is “the Chinese” pushing this, saying it is Americans asking what is happening in their communities—why electric bills are changing and why people are being forced off property—because some American oligarch wants to build a massive data center using more energy than the rest of the state. Speaker 1: Speaker 1 responds to Kevin O’Leary by saying Americans have concerns about noise pollution, light pollution, the use of local water, takeover of farmland, and destruction of local ecosystems, and that it is not foreign agents but American people who have the right to protect communities and resources. Speaker 1 argues that data centers threaten and displace local people and that they provide no benefit to the communities affected. The outcome is described as job replacement rather than job creation, with claims that people would face 24/7 noise from gas turbines and a gigawatt of power without receiving an “utopia” of abundance. Speaker 1 says the result includes noise, pollution, taking water, destroying real estate value, and taking jobs. Speaker 1 identifies himself as an accomplished AI developer who supports AI technology when used “for humanity,” but calls the data center effort “a threat to humanity.”