TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In 2019, Parliament removed the crime of spreading false news from the Canadian Criminal Code, a provision that existed in the 1954 version. This raises questions about the trustworthiness of the government, especially when it comes to handling public health and media accountability. The government has been criticized for its financial practices, restricting access to effective treatments, and promoting vaccines without thorough investigations into their safety. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets like CBC and CTV are perceived to operate without consequences for misinformation. This situation challenges the belief that elected representatives are looking out for the public's best interests.

The speaker discusses four ways in which the Canadian healthcare system has been hijacked. Firstly, agile regulations have allowed drugs like mRNA technology to be approved without proving safety. Public health officials were given scripts to promote vaccine benefits, starting with a pre-marketing campaign called "building vaccine confidence." The Canadian Global Media, CBC, joined the Trusted News Initiative in 2019, allowing certain players to control the narrative. Taxpayer money was used to pay off researchers through the Globet R road map, aligning with the World Health Organization's agenda. The head of NAFC received significant research funding during the pandemic, raising concerns about impartiality. The co-chair of NAFLI also received funding to prepare Canadians for vaccine readiness.

The speaker claims to have witnessed a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of deaths worldwide due to vaccines. In their private practice, they've seen almost 1500 patients, previously healthy, now disabled and suffering years later, believing they are addressing the greatest unmet need in the country: care for the vaccine-injured. The speaker believes the government has been fully captured by corporations and industrial complexes. They allege that agencies like the CDC, FDA, NIH, and EPA, along with big food, are polluting air, water, and medicines. They also claim the government is allowing immigrants in, surveilling and censoring citizens, and stripping away rights, with most of the country unaware. The speaker states their goal is to educate people about this and "rescue the republic."

The speaker criticizes the Canadian justice system, claiming it treats innocent people as guilty and covers up the harm caused by COVID-19 injections and mandates. They argue that the trial of four individuals is a farce and a waste of time and taxpayer money. Another speaker emphasizes the need for the Canadian people to resist the corrupt government. The abuse of the court process and the impact on the accused individuals is condemned. The main focus is on the unlawful mandates and the government's responsibility for the situation. The absence of media coverage is mentioned, with gratitude expressed for the presence of one reporter.

The speaker claims that unvaccinated individuals entering hospitals were deliberately killed. According to the speaker, every unvaccinated person they interviewed who went to the hospital reported not receiving the same treatments as vaccinated patients. Instead, they were allegedly given remdesivir, ventilation, and fentanyl, leading to their deaths. Another speaker adds that hospitals had financial incentives to produce COVID-related deaths, allegedly receiving up to $500,000 per death in California. The first speaker agrees, stating that hospital coders and whistleblowers revealed that patients were repeatedly tested for COVID until a positive result was obtained, triggering payments. They claim hospitals received additional payments for each drug and piece of equipment used, totaling over $500,000 per person. One person allegedly said their daughter was worth more dead than alive.

Dan Dix opens by presenting a stark portrait of Canada, praising compassion and healthcare but asserting a dark secret: ninety thousand lives have been killed through Canada’s medical assistance in dying program (MAiD) since legalization in 2016. He asserts this number is an estimate based on what is known and that the true figure could be higher, noting that doctors are sometimes under pressure to propose MAID even when patients do not raise it. He frames MAiD as a system that is accelerating, claiming it has become the leading cause of death in some provinces and that, in 2024, nearly five percent of all deaths in Canada were due to MAID—one in every twenty deaths. Dix argues the scope has expanded beyond terminal illness to include poverty, mental health, or simply feeling like a burden. He alleges veterans with PTSD, disabled individuals, and people who cannot afford housing are being offered MAID. He contends this is not compassionate care but a “conveyor belt to death” sold as dignity, and accuses the government of not fully disclosing the data. He provides anecdotes, saying he knows a man who was offered MAID three times during a single hospital visit, clarifying that the person wanted help, not an option to end his life. He characterizes Canada’s euthanasia regime as a machine “chewing up the vulnerable, the poor, and the broken, and spitting out body bags,” and asserts the world is watching, labeling Canada as “progressive” while describing the situation as a dystopian nightmare. In addressing what should be done, Dix encourages discussion, sharing the video, and demanding answers about why Canada is promoting death as a solution to suffering. He emphasizes the 90,000 figure as representing real people with families and futures. Dix references his video featuring Angelina Ireland from the Delta Hospice Society, describing how the government allegedly took her property for refusing to participate in MAID and allegedly sent “death cult activists” to shut her down. He asserts that there is resistance to MAID and calls for support for that movement. He promotes audience action: share the video, join the fight for life, and support his efforts via donations at pressfortruth.ca/donate, with options for one-time PayPal donations, monthly contributions, e-transfer to Dan@pressfortruth.ca, or mail to his P.O. box. Dix concludes by urging viewers to choose life over death, promising more video reports, and signing off with a call to subscribe, like, share, and stay tuned. He closes with a reiteration of “truth” as the guiding message.

We are facing a soft coup where new laws are being created under the guise of pandemic preparedness, stripping away human rights protections. The WHO is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would enforce surveillance, censorship, and limit freedom of speech. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days. These changes would give the WHO power to dictate which drugs countries can use during a pandemic. The concept of One Health would allow the WHO to control everything globally, with a belief that humans are no more valuable than animals.

It's crazy. They'll do it if you're just depressed. They'll do it if you don't like being overweight. It's awful. It's a lot of the vaccine injured are doing it. They're going to Switzerland to Canada for this. The Canada numbers are bananas. More than fifteen thousand people received medical assisted assistance in dying in Canada in 2023. Yes. What is it in 2024 now? Imagine 2025, where they're this is crazy. 15,000 people, they've helped them die instead of, like, help them live. Instead of, we used to call suicide hotline. Hey. Don't do it, Bob. And now Canada's, like, come on in. Press 1 if you want the suicide and see appointment for you.

Speaker 0: They use them for to amplify fear, to boost compliance, and, of course, push those vaccines. Well, joining me now is primary care physician and author of unavoidably unsafe childhood Reconsidered. Doctor Jeff Barky is with us. Doc, it's great to have you back on. Speaker 1: Hey, Grant. Thanks for having me. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: Alright. I know this comes as no surprise, this number, that only fourteen percent of the PCR positive turned out to be COVID in Germany. I would imagine it translates to The United States. But your reaction and now seeing this done by real scientists, real doctors in a real journal of medicine. Speaker 1: Well, there's no surprise by this study. We knew it all along. The PCR test was never designed to detect infection. What it detects is miniscule particles of the RNA virus, and then they would crank up the cycle threshold. They would amplify the test to create positivity. And so the problem is that you could test the side of a table and get a positive result, let alone that we were actually going to treat based on a test result. I was always taught in medical school, we don't treat test results, we treat patients. And that's what I tried to do. And then the government went out of its way to suppress effective repurposed medication, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This was a money game. This was a scam. This was all based on fear. No surprise out of Germany. Speaker 0: You know, I I believe it. And let's not forget because we always talk about the money and the vaccines and big pharma and their ties to government, and I know that was a lot. But let's not forget too. This was weaponized to keep people home so they wouldn't vote for president Trump during during that twenty twenty election. It was all part of the big steal. Speaker 1: These positives, they wanted lots of positives. They didn't want negatives. They wanted positives. Didn't they, doc? Speaker 0: They absolutely did for a variety of reasons. The more you can keep people in fear, the more likely it is they're gonna follow your directive. We've never seen anything like this before. The government imposing its will upon free citizens. They closed churches. They closed mom and pop stores. They forced healthy people to stay indoors, and they closed down hospitals and told sick people to stay away. I've never seen anything like that happen before. The sad part here, Grant, is I'm not clear that the American people learned their lesson. And when the government comes around and does this again, I just hope enough of us will stand up this time and say, hell no. Well

We were right to refuse the jab, as a recent report from the Western standard reveals that the government and Privy Council knew about the harms it could cause. They deliberately concealed this information and used propaganda to manipulate us into compliance, forcing us to wear masks and destroying our businesses. The government's complicity in this genocide, along with the media's collaboration, has resulted in countless deaths. When will we finally say enough is enough?

This year, it was revealed that $2.3 billion was allocated by the government, specifically the CDC and FDA, to pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS to discourage the prescription of ivermectin and other treatments recommended by doctors. The federal government has now acknowledged that these treatments were effective and expressed regret for suppressing them, admitting that this has led to unnecessary deaths. The influence of big pharma, particularly figures like Bill Gates, has resulted in restrictions on what healthcare professionals can prescribe, leading to consequences such as decertification and job loss for those who defy these guidelines. This situation highlights the dangers of a powerful cartel controlling medical practices.

The German medical profession and institutions were corrupted during the Nazi era. Coercive public health policies violated individual rights, using fear of infectious diseases to demonize Jews. This blame tactic has a long history, as Jews were also blamed for past plagues. Fear and propaganda were used to establish a genocidal regime, and some now understand why the German people didn't resist. Today, medical mandates are seen as a step towards a fascist dictatorship and genocide, undermining our freedom and dignity. The Holocaust taught us that when doctors align with the government and abandon their commitment to do no harm, medicine can become a murderous tool.

In this video, the speakers discuss the challenges faced by doctors who speak out against mainstream narratives. They explain that in order to speak freely, doctors often have to give up their medical licenses, which discredits them in the eyes of the media. The speakers argue that having a license does not determine one's knowledge or experience in the field. They also discuss how the regulatory bodies that control doctors' licenses, such as the colleges of physicians and surgeons, can easily be compromised. The speakers highlight the corruption within these bodies, which are run by lawyers and powerful families. They mention that in British Columbia, the government has amended the Health Professions Act to have more control over doctors and enforce mandatory vaccinations.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

Speaker 0 argues that the government and premier treated British Columbians like guinea pigs, forcing experimental procedures without consent. They claim the numbers support this: all seven doctors in the obstetrics department in Kamloops are gone, and the pediatrics unit in Kelowna is gone, describing this as just the tip of the iceberg. The speaker asserts the devastation is widespread and states that the health minister and the premier should not expect applause for the careers wrecked and lives upended by what they call unscientific mandates. They pledge to stand for the voices of thousands of health care workers the government purportedly cast aside. The speaker ends with a question aimed at the premier: will the premier himself apologize to the health care workers whose lives were derailed by these punitive COVID policies?

In 2019, the Canadian government removed the crime of spreading false news from the Criminal Code. This raises concerns about trusting a government that takes our money, restricts effective treatments, and fails to investigate the safety of promoted vaccines. Additionally, the parliament we elect allows mainstream media to freely lie without consequences.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker claims former British colonies are becoming tyrannical, North Korean-style governments influenced by biased science. They allege Canadian news is propaganda, contrasting it with American news. A Canadian political YouTube channel was allegedly shut down by the CBC for expressing dissenting views. Canadians are supposedly blocked from viewing certain American content. Fluoride is being reintroduced into Calgary's water supply despite European bans, based on Health Canada's recommendation. Banks can allegedly close or reduce credit lines, reminiscent of actions during trucker protests. The speaker claims the Canadian government interferes with private property. The speaker alleges criminals are protected, and the MAID program is offered to children, the depressed, and those who can't afford to live. The CBC allegedly misrepresents Canada's economic performance, which is claimed to be the worst in the G7. The speaker suggests Alberta should separate from Canada.

The speaker rails against what they call state-funded propaganda from Canada, focusing on a CBC piece and a two-minute segment from This Hour Has Twenty Two Minutes about an ostrich crisis in Edgewood, British Columbia. They describe the CBC as a crown corporation funded by taxpayers and labeled it “state funded propaganda.” The core topic is a farm in Edgewood with about 400 ostriches that have been on the farm for over 35 years. After ostrich testing related to antibodies in eggs and yolk during COVID, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ordered the kill of all ostriches on the farm, including the healthy birds, citing an avian flu outbreak. The speaker explains that in December 2024 two ostriches were tested by the CFIA with anal swab PCR; the results allegedly indicated avian flu (H5N1) in those two carcasses. The farm challenged the CFIA decision in federal court, and by May the court found the CFIA’s decision not inherently unreasonable and allowed the kill order to stand. The farm appealed to the Court of Appeal in Ottawa, and by August the appellate court upheld that the birds should be killed, despite eight months of healthy birds on the farm. The farm then pursued a Supreme Court of Canada route, with an interim protective order preventing slaughter while the Supreme Court considers whether to hear the case; if they do not hear it, the protective order lapses and the CFIA may proceed with slaughter. A standoff has persisted for about a month, with the CFIA constructing kill pens and the RCMP providing armored protection to the CFIA. The farm asserts that about 100 ostriches are missing and that one ostrich died under CFIA custody from dehydration and neglect, named Spirit. The speaker claims the CFIA did not administer electrolytes and that the ostrich died, alleging mistreatment by CFIA personnel who refused to provide proper care. The speaker notes that journalists, protestors, and the RCMP are present at the site, and that the CFIA has refused to provide a proper count of the remaining birds. They accuse the CFIA of misleadingly portraying the situation in BC as an ongoing outbreak and claim the birds have been healthy for nearly a year and have not been retested since December 2024, except for the two dead birds tested. They allege that the only testing occurred on dead carcasses and suggest potential false positives due to testing methods. They criticize the segment for omitting key timeline details about the outbreak and for implying the birds are sick, which the speaker contends is false. The speaker mentions external figures like Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz showing interest in the birds, and notes blows against Florida as part of the propaganda framing. Throughout, the speaker asserts that the birds are healthy, the CFIA is withholding retesting, and the CBC piece is an example of manufacturing consent and disinformation. They urge viewers to unsubscribe or resist the show, claim the segment is insidious, and argue that the real issue is government control and alignment with global health agreements rather than animal illness. The confrontation concludes with a call to share the video and to recognize the broadcast as propaganda, while ending with personal promotional remarks about health, sunlight, and Florida.

Speaker 0 argued that the government and the premier treated British Columbians like guinea pigs, insisting that experimental procedures were imposed without their consent. He asserted that the numbers are telling the truth: seven doctors in the obstetrics department in Kamloops have left, and the pediatrics unit in Kelowna has also disappeared. He described these examples as just the tip of the iceberg, insisting that the devastation caused by these actions is widespread. According to Speaker 0, if the health minister and the premier expect applause for the careers wrecked and the lives upended by what he characterized as unscientific mandates, they should not expect it from him. He stated that he stands in the legislative chamber for the voice of those who do not have a voice in this place—the thousands of health care workers whom he contends this government has cast aside. The speaker then raised a single pointed question that he believes deserves an answer: will the premier himself apologize to the health care workers whose lives were derailed by the government’s punitive COVID policies?

The speaker states that the CBC betrayed the public trust by shutting down one side of the debate, branding chosen experts as trustworthy while portraying others as spreaders of disinformation, regardless of their background. As a journalist, the speaker was contacted by people with stories of suffering, including the vaccine-injured, those who lost jobs due to vaccination status, families torn apart, depressed students, and parents agonizing over vaccinating their children. The speaker felt the burden of these untold stories and felt they had failed to give voice to their truth. The speaker witnessed the collapse of journalism and believes they were pushing propaganda, defined as one-sided information broadcast to influence opinion, or manipulative persuasion in service of an agenda.

The Canadian health care system was hijacked in four ways. Firstly, they used agile regulations to approve drugs without proving their safety. Secondly, public health officials were given scripts to promote the benefits of vaccines, starting with a pre-marketing campaign. Thirdly, the Canadian global media, including CBC, joined the Trusted News Initiative, allowing outside influence on their reporting. Lastly, taxpayer money was used to pay off experts and researchers who followed the World Health Organization's agenda. For example, the head of NACI received millions in research funding and gave the blessing for immunization. These actions were taken before knowing the vaccines' effectiveness.

People in this country and globally have been steamrolled in a coordinated and integrated effort planned over decades. Legislative changes were implemented to control doctors and people. However, individuals are resisting, and those responsible will be held accountable. The aim is to expose the global agenda and secure freedom for the people of Australia in the future.

A woman shares a heartbreaking story about a 13-year-old girl who had cancer and was convinced by doctors and nurses at a hospital in Edmonton, Alberta to end her own life using medical assistance in dying (MAID). The girl's parents had left her briefly to get some supplies when this happened. The mother, who had come to the hospital the day after her daughter's death, was devastated and felt helpless because the girl had signed the consent form. The speaker expresses anger towards the healthcare system and advises parents to keep their children away from hospitals. They also mention an article from CBC that claims MAID will save a significant amount of money in healthcare expenses.

The government is aggressively expanding the MAID program to include mental health disorders for euthanasia. A 27-year-old woman with autism and ADHD was approved for MAID and euthanized despite her father's efforts to stop it. There are concerns that vaccine-injured individuals will be pushed towards MAID. Canadians are complacent about these changes, which now include allowing children to make end-of-life decisions without parental consent. Canada has the loosest standards for euthanasia globally. The UK is also facing similar terrifying developments.