reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 2019, Parliament removed the crime of spreading false news from the Canadian Criminal Code, a provision that existed in the 1954 version. This raises questions about the trustworthiness of the government, especially when it comes to handling public health and media accountability. The government has been criticized for its financial practices, restricting access to effective treatments, and promoting vaccines without thorough investigations into their safety. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets like CBC and CTV are perceived to operate without consequences for misinformation. This situation challenges the belief that elected representatives are looking out for the public's best interests.

The speaker discusses four ways in which the Canadian healthcare system has been hijacked. Firstly, agile regulations have allowed drugs like mRNA technology to be approved without proving safety. Public health officials were given scripts to promote vaccine benefits, starting with a pre-marketing campaign called "building vaccine confidence." The Canadian Global Media, CBC, joined the Trusted News Initiative in 2019, allowing certain players to control the narrative. Taxpayer money was used to pay off researchers through the Globet R road map, aligning with the World Health Organization's agenda. The head of NAFC received significant research funding during the pandemic, raising concerns about impartiality. The co-chair of NAFLI also received funding to prepare Canadians for vaccine readiness.

The speaker claims to have witnessed a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of deaths worldwide due to vaccines. In their private practice, they've seen almost 1500 patients, previously healthy, now disabled and suffering years later, believing they are addressing the greatest unmet need in the country: care for the vaccine-injured. The speaker believes the government has been fully captured by corporations and industrial complexes. They allege that agencies like the CDC, FDA, NIH, and EPA, along with big food, are polluting air, water, and medicines. They also claim the government is allowing immigrants in, surveilling and censoring citizens, and stripping away rights, with most of the country unaware. The speaker states their goal is to educate people about this and "rescue the republic."

The speaker criticizes the Canadian justice system, claiming it treats innocent people as guilty and covers up the harm caused by COVID-19 injections and mandates. They argue that the trial of four individuals is a farce and a waste of time and taxpayer money. Another speaker emphasizes the need for the Canadian people to resist the corrupt government. The abuse of the court process and the impact on the accused individuals is condemned. The main focus is on the unlawful mandates and the government's responsibility for the situation. The absence of media coverage is mentioned, with gratitude expressed for the presence of one reporter.

The speaker criticizes medical screening and procedures for women, claiming that mammograms radiate the breast area and cause the very illness they are trying to detect. They describe mammograms as a torturous process and advocate for alternatives like thermography. They argue that “all the things they do to ladies” include torture of the private parts, naming pap tests and pap smears as part of this mistreatment. The speaker asserts there is a “demonic system” that tortures women by entering areas that supposedly do not need to be examined, leading to the discovery of cells thought to be ill, followed by radiation, chemotherapy, and surgeries such as removing ovaries or the entire uterus. They claim a PCR test can be used to say someone has an illness they do not have, and after such a determination, surgery is performed, only to have professionals later realize they were wrong. The speaker contends that even when the uterus has been removed, the mistake remains. They reference the book Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins to argue there is a “monopoly health care system” that is not about health but profits, describing it as a monopoly of “demonic entities” poisoning the people and reducing the population. Additionally, the speaker asserts a claim about medical malpractice, stating that over one million people die each year from medical malpractice. They present the overall narrative as a conspiracy-like critique of modern healthcare, tying together screening, diagnostic tests, surgical interventions, and the influence of supposed malignant forces behind the healthcare system. The speaker emphasizes that the book Murder by Injection explains the monopoly health care system as a mechanism of population control, rather than a system focused on health.

The speaker claims that unvaccinated individuals entering hospitals were deliberately killed. According to the speaker, every unvaccinated person they interviewed who went to the hospital reported not receiving the same treatments as vaccinated patients. Instead, they were allegedly given remdesivir, ventilation, and fentanyl, leading to their deaths. Another speaker adds that hospitals had financial incentives to produce COVID-related deaths, allegedly receiving up to $500,000 per death in California. The first speaker agrees, stating that hospital coders and whistleblowers revealed that patients were repeatedly tested for COVID until a positive result was obtained, triggering payments. They claim hospitals received additional payments for each drug and piece of equipment used, totaling over $500,000 per person. One person allegedly said their daughter was worth more dead than alive.

Dan Dix opens by presenting a stark portrait of Canada, praising compassion and healthcare but asserting a dark secret: ninety thousand lives have been killed through Canada’s medical assistance in dying program (MAiD) since legalization in 2016. He asserts this number is an estimate based on what is known and that the true figure could be higher, noting that doctors are sometimes under pressure to propose MAID even when patients do not raise it. He frames MAiD as a system that is accelerating, claiming it has become the leading cause of death in some provinces and that, in 2024, nearly five percent of all deaths in Canada were due to MAID—one in every twenty deaths. Dix argues the scope has expanded beyond terminal illness to include poverty, mental health, or simply feeling like a burden. He alleges veterans with PTSD, disabled individuals, and people who cannot afford housing are being offered MAID. He contends this is not compassionate care but a “conveyor belt to death” sold as dignity, and accuses the government of not fully disclosing the data. He provides anecdotes, saying he knows a man who was offered MAID three times during a single hospital visit, clarifying that the person wanted help, not an option to end his life. He characterizes Canada’s euthanasia regime as a machine “chewing up the vulnerable, the poor, and the broken, and spitting out body bags,” and asserts the world is watching, labeling Canada as “progressive” while describing the situation as a dystopian nightmare. In addressing what should be done, Dix encourages discussion, sharing the video, and demanding answers about why Canada is promoting death as a solution to suffering. He emphasizes the 90,000 figure as representing real people with families and futures. Dix references his video featuring Angelina Ireland from the Delta Hospice Society, describing how the government allegedly took her property for refusing to participate in MAID and allegedly sent “death cult activists” to shut her down. He asserts that there is resistance to MAID and calls for support for that movement. He promotes audience action: share the video, join the fight for life, and support his efforts via donations at pressfortruth.ca/donate, with options for one-time PayPal donations, monthly contributions, e-transfer to Dan@pressfortruth.ca, or mail to his P.O. box. Dix concludes by urging viewers to choose life over death, promising more video reports, and signing off with a call to subscribe, like, share, and stay tuned. He closes with a reiteration of “truth” as the guiding message.

It's crazy. They'll do it if you're just depressed. They'll do it if you don't like being overweight. It's awful. It's a lot of the vaccine injured are doing it. They're going to Switzerland to Canada for this. The Canada numbers are bananas. More than fifteen thousand people received medical assisted assistance in dying in Canada in 2023. Yes. What is it in 2024 now? Imagine 2025, where they're this is crazy. 15,000 people, they've helped them die instead of, like, help them live. Instead of, we used to call suicide hotline. Hey. Don't do it, Bob. And now Canada's, like, come on in. Press 1 if you want the suicide and see appointment for you.

Speaker 0: They use them for to amplify fear, to boost compliance, and, of course, push those vaccines. Well, joining me now is primary care physician and author of unavoidably unsafe childhood Reconsidered. Doctor Jeff Barky is with us. Doc, it's great to have you back on. Speaker 1: Hey, Grant. Thanks for having me. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: Alright. I know this comes as no surprise, this number, that only fourteen percent of the PCR positive turned out to be COVID in Germany. I would imagine it translates to The United States. But your reaction and now seeing this done by real scientists, real doctors in a real journal of medicine. Speaker 1: Well, there's no surprise by this study. We knew it all along. The PCR test was never designed to detect infection. What it detects is miniscule particles of the RNA virus, and then they would crank up the cycle threshold. They would amplify the test to create positivity. And so the problem is that you could test the side of a table and get a positive result, let alone that we were actually going to treat based on a test result. I was always taught in medical school, we don't treat test results, we treat patients. And that's what I tried to do. And then the government went out of its way to suppress effective repurposed medication, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This was a money game. This was a scam. This was all based on fear. No surprise out of Germany. Speaker 0: You know, I I believe it. And let's not forget because we always talk about the money and the vaccines and big pharma and their ties to government, and I know that was a lot. But let's not forget too. This was weaponized to keep people home so they wouldn't vote for president Trump during during that twenty twenty election. It was all part of the big steal. Speaker 1: These positives, they wanted lots of positives. They didn't want negatives. They wanted positives. Didn't they, doc? Speaker 0: They absolutely did for a variety of reasons. The more you can keep people in fear, the more likely it is they're gonna follow your directive. We've never seen anything like this before. The government imposing its will upon free citizens. They closed churches. They closed mom and pop stores. They forced healthy people to stay indoors, and they closed down hospitals and told sick people to stay away. I've never seen anything like that happen before. The sad part here, Grant, is I'm not clear that the American people learned their lesson. And when the government comes around and does this again, I just hope enough of us will stand up this time and say, hell no. Well

We were right to refuse the jab, as a recent report from the Western standard reveals that the government and Privy Council knew about the harms it could cause. They deliberately concealed this information and used propaganda to manipulate us into compliance, forcing us to wear masks and destroying our businesses. The government's complicity in this genocide, along with the media's collaboration, has resulted in countless deaths. When will we finally say enough is enough?

Speaker 0: It was January 2022 when a colleague of mine in the unit came to me saying, something's up. We've had a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year. And that's what got my curiosity piqued. Speaker 1: Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2: I have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 3: Doctors made extra money to push vaccines and they were given a billing code to do it. I have pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 2: They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved. They've distributed it to the province so the second it's approved, we can start jabbing ourselves with it. We can start jabbing pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4: Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, And then you don't. Speaker 0: I was suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials. Possible. They pushed on with this narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2: They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1: Our Canadian babies died, and the police are trying to cover it up to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it. Speaker 2: The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression. Speaker 4: If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. Speaker 2: It started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public. Speaker 5: Canada has to shift their understanding of what the CBC is. It is a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 2: This is the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective, and they're still not investigating. Everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, our health agencies, how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.

This year, it was revealed that $2.3 billion was allocated by the government, specifically the CDC and FDA, to pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS to discourage the prescription of ivermectin and other treatments recommended by doctors. The federal government has now acknowledged that these treatments were effective and expressed regret for suppressing them, admitting that this has led to unnecessary deaths. The influence of big pharma, particularly figures like Bill Gates, has resulted in restrictions on what healthcare professionals can prescribe, leading to consequences such as decertification and job loss for those who defy these guidelines. This situation highlights the dangers of a powerful cartel controlling medical practices.

Speaker 0 notes a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 says their own government told them a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2 states they have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 1 says doctors made extra money to push vaccines and were given a billing code to do it, and she has pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 3 asserts they’ve purchased the vaccine that hasn’t been approved and distributed it to the provinces, so the second it’s approved they can start jabbing themselves and pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4 asks why vaccinations were necessary, noting that when going to the hospital for birth, you expect to go home, and then you don’t. Speaker 0 suspects criminal negligence by the government and public health officials. Speaker 2 agrees, saying “Possible.” Speaker 0 contends they pushed a narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 recalls wiretapping, harassment, and charges, and that they didn’t allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1 says Canadian babies died, and police are trying to cover it up by stopping detective Helen Graves from testifying about it. Speaker 3 comments that dominant individuals maintain subordinates’ place through constant aggression. Speaker 5 argues that choosing not to vaccinate is one thing, but being unable to fly or ride trains with vaccinated people and thus putting them at risk is another issue. Speaker 2 says CBC started with a story to implicate her and paint her in an uncomplimentary light to the public. Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of CBC, describing it as a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 3 declares this is the most significant health matter affecting children today, and they are still not investigating. Speaker 2 asserts that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, and how they work together and censored information; all of it ties to this one case, making it dangerous.

The speaker discusses Canada becoming interesting in January and February due to protesters in Ottawa. The job of reporters, according to the speaker, is to go out and ask protesters why they are on the streets, why they are there with their kids, and why there is a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa, to discover the story. The speaker claims the Government did not want that and that the Prime Minister decided in advance that the protesters were all the modern excommunications—Nazis, white supremacists, anti-Semites, probably homophobes, misogynists, probably transphobes, etc.—and then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. The speaker asks what the mainstream media would do at such a time, and asserts they would question it, but claims the Canadian mainstream media did not and instead acted as an Amen Chorus of the government. Several examples are provided. A CBC host described the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. A Toronto Star columnist said, “sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation.” The speaker notes that CBC claimed two indigenous women who were scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence did not bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition. The National Observer allegedly stated that many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were, in fact, duped by the truckers. A Globe and Mail reporter claimed, “My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew” out of fear of antisemitic violence, without mentioning that one of the convoy leaders was Jewish. The speaker argues this demonstrably rancid and corrupt behavior is rooted in a system where in Canada, the media is funded by the government. It is stated that in 2018, election year, there was a coincidence with the government funding; the Canadian media allegedly received $595,000,000 over five years, and the Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. The government is described as able to tell banks to shut down people’s bank accounts, and able to tell the media what to do, with the media then doing the bidding of the government camp. The speaker concludes that this is not a free society’s media.

Speaker 0 argues that the government and premier treated British Columbians like guinea pigs, forcing experimental procedures without consent. They claim the numbers support this: all seven doctors in the obstetrics department in Kamloops are gone, and the pediatrics unit in Kelowna is gone, describing this as just the tip of the iceberg. The speaker asserts the devastation is widespread and states that the health minister and the premier should not expect applause for the careers wrecked and lives upended by what they call unscientific mandates. They pledge to stand for the voices of thousands of health care workers the government purportedly cast aside. The speaker ends with a question aimed at the premier: will the premier himself apologize to the health care workers whose lives were derailed by these punitive COVID policies?

In 2019, the Canadian government removed the crime of spreading false news from the Criminal Code. This raises concerns about trusting a government that takes our money, restricts effective treatments, and fails to investigate the safety of promoted vaccines. Additionally, the parliament we elect allows mainstream media to freely lie without consequences.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker claims former British colonies are becoming tyrannical, North Korean-style governments influenced by biased science. They allege Canadian news is propaganda, contrasting it with American news. A Canadian political YouTube channel was allegedly shut down by the CBC for expressing dissenting views. Canadians are supposedly blocked from viewing certain American content. Fluoride is being reintroduced into Calgary's water supply despite European bans, based on Health Canada's recommendation. Banks can allegedly close or reduce credit lines, reminiscent of actions during trucker protests. The speaker claims the Canadian government interferes with private property. The speaker alleges criminals are protected, and the MAID program is offered to children, the depressed, and those who can't afford to live. The CBC allegedly misrepresents Canada's economic performance, which is claimed to be the worst in the G7. The speaker suggests Alberta should separate from Canada.

The speaker, whose background is in critical care, worked throughout the pandemic in the ICU providing direct care to COVID patients. After eighteen months of what they describe as “chaos,” they left the bedside because they “could not watch one more” of their patients “needlessly die” due to “deadly hospital protocols” and the “denial of life saving medications.” They state that hospital messaging said COVID was killing all patients, but they contend that “this was not the case at all,” and instead that “the complete and total medical mismanagement of COVID” was killing them. They argue that if patients were truly dying of the virus itself, there would be widespread deaths outside healthcare settings, asking why bodies were not being pulled “from homes and off of the streets en masse.” They then assert that “patients… they’re not dying at home” and “they’re not dying on our streets,” and claim that people are dying “in our hospitals,” saying it is “time that we start asking ourselves why.” Although they “walked away,” they say one thing that still haunts them from bedside work is the patients’ “faces”—specifically the faces of patients they “knew didn’t need to die.” They describe not being comfortable with death initially, but learning that death comes for all of us eventually. They say that in nursing—especially in the ICU—they learned that there are “fates far worse than death.” They describe providing compassion in a patient’s last moments as an “honor,” emphasizing care and compassion during end-of-life periods. They frame their experience during the pandemic as “different,” saying these patients “didn’t die from a disease” and “didn’t die from a virus,” but instead “died in a hospital holocaust.” They use this description to claim that a “shamelessly corrupt system,” which they say used “well intentioned nurses” to carry out a “sinister plan,” was responsible. They further state that “ventilators” are “the new gas chambers.” Finally, the speaker says they did not leave before witnessing “numerous alarming signs” that “these novel vaccines were causing great harm” to their patients.

The speaker rails against what they call state-funded propaganda from Canada, focusing on a CBC piece and a two-minute segment from This Hour Has Twenty Two Minutes about an ostrich crisis in Edgewood, British Columbia. They describe the CBC as a crown corporation funded by taxpayers and labeled it “state funded propaganda.” The core topic is a farm in Edgewood with about 400 ostriches that have been on the farm for over 35 years. After ostrich testing related to antibodies in eggs and yolk during COVID, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ordered the kill of all ostriches on the farm, including the healthy birds, citing an avian flu outbreak. The speaker explains that in December 2024 two ostriches were tested by the CFIA with anal swab PCR; the results allegedly indicated avian flu (H5N1) in those two carcasses. The farm challenged the CFIA decision in federal court, and by May the court found the CFIA’s decision not inherently unreasonable and allowed the kill order to stand. The farm appealed to the Court of Appeal in Ottawa, and by August the appellate court upheld that the birds should be killed, despite eight months of healthy birds on the farm. The farm then pursued a Supreme Court of Canada route, with an interim protective order preventing slaughter while the Supreme Court considers whether to hear the case; if they do not hear it, the protective order lapses and the CFIA may proceed with slaughter. A standoff has persisted for about a month, with the CFIA constructing kill pens and the RCMP providing armored protection to the CFIA. The farm asserts that about 100 ostriches are missing and that one ostrich died under CFIA custody from dehydration and neglect, named Spirit. The speaker claims the CFIA did not administer electrolytes and that the ostrich died, alleging mistreatment by CFIA personnel who refused to provide proper care. The speaker notes that journalists, protestors, and the RCMP are present at the site, and that the CFIA has refused to provide a proper count of the remaining birds. They accuse the CFIA of misleadingly portraying the situation in BC as an ongoing outbreak and claim the birds have been healthy for nearly a year and have not been retested since December 2024, except for the two dead birds tested. They allege that the only testing occurred on dead carcasses and suggest potential false positives due to testing methods. They criticize the segment for omitting key timeline details about the outbreak and for implying the birds are sick, which the speaker contends is false. The speaker mentions external figures like Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz showing interest in the birds, and notes blows against Florida as part of the propaganda framing. Throughout, the speaker asserts that the birds are healthy, the CFIA is withholding retesting, and the CBC piece is an example of manufacturing consent and disinformation. They urge viewers to unsubscribe or resist the show, claim the segment is insidious, and argue that the real issue is government control and alignment with global health agreements rather than animal illness. The confrontation concludes with a call to share the video and to recognize the broadcast as propaganda, while ending with personal promotional remarks about health, sunlight, and Florida.

Speaker 0 argued that the government and the premier treated British Columbians like guinea pigs, insisting that experimental procedures were imposed without their consent. He asserted that the numbers are telling the truth: seven doctors in the obstetrics department in Kamloops have left, and the pediatrics unit in Kelowna has also disappeared. He described these examples as just the tip of the iceberg, insisting that the devastation caused by these actions is widespread. According to Speaker 0, if the health minister and the premier expect applause for the careers wrecked and the lives upended by what he characterized as unscientific mandates, they should not expect it from him. He stated that he stands in the legislative chamber for the voice of those who do not have a voice in this place—the thousands of health care workers whom he contends this government has cast aside. The speaker then raised a single pointed question that he believes deserves an answer: will the premier himself apologize to the health care workers whose lives were derailed by the government’s punitive COVID policies?

The Canadian health care system was hijacked in four ways. Firstly, they used agile regulations to approve drugs without proving their safety. Secondly, public health officials were given scripts to promote the benefits of vaccines, starting with a pre-marketing campaign. Thirdly, the Canadian global media, including CBC, joined the Trusted News Initiative, allowing outside influence on their reporting. Lastly, taxpayer money was used to pay off experts and researchers who followed the World Health Organization's agenda. For example, the head of NACI received millions in research funding and gave the blessing for immunization. These actions were taken before knowing the vaccines' effectiveness.

People in this country and globally have been steamrolled in a coordinated and integrated effort planned over decades. Legislative changes were implemented to control doctors and people. However, individuals are resisting, and those responsible will be held accountable. The aim is to expose the global agenda and secure freedom for the people of Australia in the future.

A woman shares a heartbreaking story about a 13-year-old girl who had cancer and was convinced by doctors and nurses at a hospital in Edmonton, Alberta to end her own life using medical assistance in dying (MAID). The girl's parents had left her briefly to get some supplies when this happened. The mother, who had come to the hospital the day after her daughter's death, was devastated and felt helpless because the girl had signed the consent form. The speaker expresses anger towards the healthcare system and advises parents to keep their children away from hospitals. They also mention an article from CBC that claims MAID will save a significant amount of money in healthcare expenses.

The government is aggressively expanding the MAID program to include mental health disorders for euthanasia. A 27-year-old woman with autism and ADHD was approved for MAID and euthanized despite her father's efforts to stop it. There are concerns that vaccine-injured individuals will be pushed towards MAID. Canadians are complacent about these changes, which now include allowing children to make end-of-life decisions without parental consent. Canada has the loosest standards for euthanasia globally. The UK is also facing similar terrifying developments.