TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims the Catholic Church's relationship with Muslims is part of their plan of salvation, as stated in the Catholic Catechism 841. They profess Muslims hold the faith of Abraham and together adore one merciful God. According to the speaker, very few people realize that Catholics started Islam to try to get the holy land back. They funded and trained Mohammed and sent a Catholic nun to marry a promising Muslim and train him to raise an army to take back the holy land for the Catholic Church. The speaker says the plan failed when Islam became too powerful and independent. The speaker believes most Muslims are unaware that their religion started as a front for the Catholic Church.

Guy Mettin argues that Russophobia is rooted in religious and historical narratives that long predate modern geopolitics. He traces the irrational hostility toward Russia to deep-seated religious split dynamics, notably the Schism between Western Catholics and Eastern Orthodox in the eleventh century, and the way Catholic propaganda cast Byzantium’s Orthodox as schismatic, barbarian, and despotic. After Byzantium fell, Russia claimed the Orthodox heritage, which then fed a narrative of confrontation with Western Europe. In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, Western powers weaponized this narrative to justify anti-Russian sentiment as Russia rose as a European power after Peter the Great and Catherine II. A key example is the forged “testament of Peter the Great,” which France’s Louis XV, Napoleon, Britain after Vienna 1815, and later U.S. circles used to cast Russia as aiming to conquer the West, justifying preemptive actions and fear-driven policy. He notes the testament’s repeated misuse by Napoleon, the British, and even post-Vienna propaganda that shaped decades of Russophobia, including cartoons and cultural depictions like Bram Stoker’s Dracula as a symbol of Russian aristocracy. He emphasizes that this phobia has two functions: the belief that Western security depends on opposing Russia, and the idea that failure to act against Russia invites invasion. This dual function persists in contemporary discourse, where European calls for more weapons to deter Russia echo the old premise that what happens on Russia’s borders determines Europe’s fate. He asserts that Russia has not historically aggressed against Western Europe in the way Western narratives claim; rather, invasions often originated from the West (Teutonic knights, Mongols, Poland, Sweden, Napoleonic France, Germany, Britain). Russia’s own incursions into Europe have been responses to aggression by others, such as Napoleon’s invasion or Hitler’s World War II actions. The discussion turns to how the West constructs an ethical framework in which liberal democracy and human rights are presented as universal ideals, and any actions by Russia are interpreted through that lens. This leads to a paradox: when European powers sanction Russian academics or journalists in the name of defending freedom of expression, it appears inconsistent with the First Amendment protections observed in the United States, while Europe pursues sanctions that curb scholarly debate. He cites specific cases: sanctions against Swiss journalist Xavier Meurice and Jacques Bou, and mentions the sanctioning of other researchers; he also highlights Thierry Breton’s sanctioning by the United States as an example of perceived contradictions in Western policy. He contrasts the greater freedom of opinion in the U.S. with growing European censorship and the suppression of discourse on topics such as NATO expansion and U.S. involvement in Ukraine. Mettin discusses how Western journalists and NGOs may be influenced or embedded within foreign policy aims. He recalls Udo Ulfkotte’s critique of the “corrupted journalist” ecosystem—NATO/N Atlantis-linked influence, seminars, and conferences designed to mold media narratives. He recounts personal experiences in Sarajevo during the 1990s, where journalists were invited by NATO and the UN and later found the narrative they were fed to be constructed. He argues that funding sources, such as Open Society foundations, can bias investigative journalism, leading to a loss of independence, as observed in his experience with the Consortium of International Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) under Soros-Open Society money. The conversation shifts to the global dimension of Russophobia. He notes a growing anti-Russian sentiment is not shared elsewhere; in parts of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, there are relatively more favorable or nuanced attitudes toward Russia, which gives him optimism that the anti-Russian stance in Europe may eventually wane. He suggests broadening analysis to Ukraine and Eastern Europe—Finland, the Baltic states, Poland, Romania, Moldova—to understand how resentment toward Soviet-era rule persists and morphs into modern attitudes toward Russia, even as the Soviet past fades. Towards the end, he mentions Orban in Hungary as an example of a leader who can separate past anti-Russian sentiment from a rational present-day policy, arguing for a more principled approach. He closes with an endorsement of discussing these issues openly and hopes that the hate of Russia will eventually diminish. He invites listeners to read his book, Russophobia, and thanks the interviewer, Maxime, for the dialogue.

In 325, the emperor Constantine made decisions about what information to include or exclude from the early Christian Bible. As a result, at least 45 books were either removed or heavily edited in our Western biblical tradition. These edits caused us to lose valuable information that emphasized the interconnectedness of everything and the language used in this field. However, we are now in the process of recovering this lost information.

The Russian monarchy, rooted in Christian beliefs, prospered under the Romanov family until their murder in 1918. Freemasonry's influence led to the revolution, with the royal family brutally killed in a dark ritual. The bodies were dismembered, dissolved, and consumed, symbolizing a shift towards a new world order. Czar Nicholas II is now a saint in the Russian Orthodox Church, prompting repentance for his dynasty's downfall.

The Catholic Church, specifically Pope Boniface VIII in 1302, created the first expressed trust in history. This trust concept originated from Crusaders leaving their homes and riches behind to fight in Jerusalem. They would entrust their property to a trusted friend, who became the trustee. However, some trustees decided to keep the treasures when the Crusaders returned, and the courts supported their right to do so. This marked the beginning of the trust system, which worked for most people but not for those who didn't get their property back.

During the era of pre-Nicene Christianity, the victors not only wrote the history books but also deleted them, along with the memory of people, buildings, and statues associated with them. The two main camps of Christians during this time were the Judeo-Christians and the Cairo Christians. The Judeo-Christians believed in Yahweh and Jesus as the son of God, while the Cairo Christians believed that Jesus descended and ascended to heaven in human form. The Cairo Christians had their own Bible, which included the gospel of the Lord and Paul's original epistles. However, the Judeo-Christians, led by Eusebius and Constantine, gained power and created their own Bible, which included the Torah and excluded the gospel of the Lord. This marked the transformation of Christianity into Judeo-Christianity.

On 05/29/1453, the world witnessed a seismic shift with the fall of Constantinople, marking the end of the Byzantine Empire and altering the course of history. This monumental event was the culmination of a siege led by Sultan Mehmed II of the Ottoman Empire, a campaign that lasted for fifty three days. The use of massive cannons, particularly the legendary basilica, played a crucial role in overcoming the city's defenses. The fall of Constantinople not only marked the end of the Byzantine Empire, but also symbolized the rise of Ottoman dominance in the region. This event paved the way for the spread of Islam into Eastern Europe and altered trade routes, prompting European explorers to seek new paths to the East, eventually leading to the Age of Exploration.

The speaker discusses pre-Nicene Christianity, asserting that victors erase history and memory, a process called Dominatio Memoriae, which allegedly wiped out the first Christian Bible and key figures involved in its creation. Two main camps in pre-Nicene Christianity are described. The first is the Judeo Christians (also called Messianic Jews or Ebionites), who later evolve into the forms we recognize today in various denominations. They all share a common belief in Yahweh as God and in Jesus Christ as born of Jews, with a Bible that includes a Jewish Torah stapled to the front. This camp is said to have a tidy, though debated, narrative shaped by centuries of editing and whitewashing. The second camp, referred to as the Cairo Christians, is presented as largely erased by Demnatio Memoriae. The Cairo Christians used the symbol Chiro (the first two Greek letters of Christ) and held fundamentally different beliefs. They believed Jesus descended to earth in a human form, crucified, resurrected, and ascended, but that upon visiting the apostles after the resurrection, he descended again and took on a completely human form. They held that the first sentence of the first Christian Bible identified Jesus’ arrival precisely: “in the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, Jesus descended into Capernaum.” They tracked this as 29 AD, with Marcionites suggesting an exact solar eclipse on November 24 at 11 AM as supporting evidence. Their gospel was the Gospel of the Lord, a direct revelation to the apostle Paul on the road to Damascus, along with Paul’s original ten epistles (Galatians, Romans, 1-2 Corinthians, Colossians, Philippians, 1-2 Thessalonians, Laodiceans, and Philemon). This is described as the first Christian Bible, unchanged since January. In contrast, the Judeo Christians would not invent a Bible until hundreds of years later, producing four Gospels, Acts, 62 additional books, and a Torah-stapled front—an “old testament” reshaped in the third century. The Cairo Christians, at one point, outnumbered the Judeo Christians and were the largest denomination across the Roman Empire. The first visible traces of Cairo influence include Marcionite inscriptions, such as the oldest known inscription bearing Jesus’ name on a Marcionite church archway in Syria, dated March and written in Greek. The Marcionites were persecuted by Romans, Jews, and Judeo Christians, and Vatican Library material has surfaced suggesting Saint Jerome drew on Marcion’s work for his Latin translations of Paul’s epistles. Marcion’s church is said to have been defaced under Demnatio Memoriae, with Marcion’s head scratched from portraits. The narrative then centers on Eusebius, the “father of church history,” and Constantine the Emperor as pivotal figures who would reshape Christianity. Eusebius, not a historian but a PR figure who allegedly believed in weaving lies if beneficial, allegedly helped Constantine convert to Christianity and establish Judeo-Christianity as Rome’s state religion. Constantine, portrayed as a devout worshiper of Sol Invictus and Pontifex Maximus, is said to have orchestrated political and religious moves, including the suppression of Cairo denominations, seizure of property, burning of Bibles, and transfer of wealth to the Christian church. Eusebius allegedly was excommunicated for Arian beliefs before being reconciled by Constantine, who appointed him to lead the council. The Council of Nicaea is described as the moment when Judeo-Christian dogma was codified and the Demnatio Memoriae extended to Marcion and the first Bible. Subsequently, Constantine allegedly issued 50 copies of Eusebius’s revised Judeo-Christian Bible, with the Torah front, and removed the Gospel of the Lord and altered Paul’s epistles, making this version the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church. The period is summarized as Islamically as “the twenty-nine days of the Council of Nicaea,” after which Christian beliefs, doctrine, and dogma are claimed to have been hijacked and inverted. The speaker ends by noting that the first Bible remains downloadable at theveryfirstbible.org and Marcionite continuity persists at marcionitechurch.org.

Speaker 1 asks if the Jesuit order is connected to the Illuminati or Freemasonry, or if it is an arm of the Catholic Church. Speaker 0 explains that long before Adam Weishaupt, the Jesuit order originated from a branch of the Illuminati called the Ilumbrados in Spain. Ignatius Loyola, the head of the Ilumbrados, received permission from the Pope to start a new order called the Society of Jesus, or the Jesuit order. They have immense power, practice liberation theology, and have been involved in revolutions and chaos worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if they are in competition with the Illuminati, to which Speaker 0 responds that they are the Illuminati.

The Bible's collection of books wasn't always the same. Early Christianity had many versions, with some books considered canonical (divinely inspired) and others apocryphal (rejected). The councils of Hippo and Carthage in the fourth century formalized the canon we know today, excluding books like the Book of Enoch and the Gospel of Thomas. These exclusions stemmed from various factors: later writing dates, radical ideas (like reincarnation), and the desire for a unified Christian doctrine to combat heresy. The Vatican didn't create the canon, but its library holds many ancient manuscripts and it's been central to preserving and interpreting the Bible throughout history, sometimes leading to conflict, as seen during the Protestant Reformation. The exclusion of these books significantly shaped the Bible we have today, highlighting ongoing debates about religious authority.

It is commonly taught in school that Rome fell in April. This is wrong. The last legitimate Western Roman Emperor actually lived until April, and then the city of Rome itself continued unchanged from this event, and so did all Roman institutions. Only the Gothic Wars, some sixty years later, actually ended the glory of Rome and destroyed most Roman institutions and infrastructure of Italy. But even then, didn't end, because the Eastern Roman Empire continued for almost another thousand years, and this empire, better known as the Byzantine Empire, was actually the legitimate continuation of the Roman Empire. We can thus see that saying Rome ended in 04/1976 is a gross oversimplification, and in fact, the Roman way of life continued for sixty more years in the West, and for thousand more years in the East.

Pope Francis, the head of the Jesuit order, made a significant announcement through his cantor. The cantor referred to Lucifer as God and claimed that Lucifer is the father of Jesus Christ. The cantor also acknowledged Lucifer as the antichrist and worshiped him. This proclamation was accompanied by a grand ceremony witnessed by a large crowd and the whole world. The pope wanted this event to be seen globally, as it marked the arrival of the son of perdition.

For the first 1500 years, Christianity was only in Europe with white figures. Christianity is seen as exclusive to Europeans, a covenant between God and the Israelites. The Jesuits forcefully converted non-Europeans, leading to artificial Christianity needing Western aid. European acceptance of Christianity was voluntary, leading to great civilizations. Without Europeans, Christianity and civilization would not exist, only paganism.

The speaker, Peter, asks if the Jesuit order is connected to and controlled by the Illuminati or Freemasonry, or if it is an arm of the Catholic Church. The other speaker explains that long ago in Spain, a branch of the Illuminati called the Ilumbrados existed. The head of the Ilumbrados, Ignatius Loyola, was arrested by the inquisition but managed to get an audience with the pope. After this, Loyola was granted permission to start a new order called the Society of Jesus, or the Jesuit order. The Jesuits, also known as the Black Pope, have significant power and are associated with Marxism and liberation theology. They are not in competition with the Illuminati, but rather are the Illuminati.

To understand the differences between Western civilization and the Islamic world, one must look at the history of Islam. Prophet Muhammad initially struggled to gain followers in Mecca and later sought acceptance from the Jewish community in Medina. When they rejected him, he shifted from a spiritual leader to a military figure, declaring war on them and establishing a system where Jews and Christians became second-class citizens, known as dhimmi, required to pay a protection tax. As Islam expanded, it imposed restrictions on non-Muslims. The Crusades were launched to liberate Jerusalem from Islamic control, which lasted until 1967. The Islamic empire grew significantly but faced pushback from Europeans, culminating in the end of the caliphate in 1924. This period saw immense violence, with millions killed under Islamic rule.

The narrative centers on the idea that victors control not only history books but also memory, describing Dominatio Memoriae as the Roman practice of erasing people, buildings, and even entire histories, with the first Christian Bible of January and its key figures suffering this fate. The timeline runs from January to March, with the Council of Nicaea marking the end of the Pre Nicene Christian era. Two main camps emerge. The first camp, the Judeo Christians (also called Messianic Jews or Ebionites), later evolving into the various forms of what becomes the Roman Catholic Church and its many denominations (Baptists, evangelicals, Anglicans, Orthodox, Protestants, Mormons, etc.), all share a single denominator: belief in Yahweh as God and that Jesus Christ was born of Jews. Their Bible is Judeo-Christian, with the Jewish Torah stapled to the front, referred to as the old testament after a third‑century renaming. Rivalry within this camp is intense, with disputes over whether to be Jews or “kinda Jewish,” illustrated by the Council of Jerusalem in 48 AD. The second camp, the Cairo Christians, is less known due to the Demnatio Memoriae. The Cairo Christians use the symbol chi-rho (the first two Greek letters of Christ) as identification, a predecessor to the Latin cross after Nicea. Both camps acknowledge Jesus as the Son of God and place extreme importance on the Apostle Paul, but beyond that, their beliefs diverge widely. The Cairo Christians have a Bible in which Jesus’s arrival and life are clearly dated in the first sentence of the first Christian Bible of January: “In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, Jesus descended into Capernaum, a city in Galilee.” Some groups like the Marcionites even pinpoint November 24 at around 11 AM as the exact moment, noting a solar eclipse in that time frame visible over Capernaum. The first Bible consists of the gospel of the Lord, plus Paul’s original ten epistles; this version is contrasted with the later Judeo-Christian canon assembled centuries later with four Gospels, Acts, 62 other books, and Torah front matter. Marcionites are described as the largest Cairo Christian denomination, persecuted by Romans, Jews, and Judeo Christians. Fragments of their influence persist, including the oldest inscription bearing Jesus’s name on a Marcionite church arch in Syria. The Vatican Library allegedly hosts manuscripts showing Saint Jerome’s source material for his Latin translations attributed to Marcion of Sino. Marcion is depicted as a target of Demnatio Memoriae, with defaced paintings of him and his head scratched off. A standalone page for Pre-Nicene History is mentioned at prenicene.org, with cross-links to firstbiblenetwork.com, and the Marcionite Church (marcionitechurch.org) is cited as existing today. The turning point arrives with Eusebius and Constantine. Eusebius, known as the father of church history, is portrayed as a PR operator who would omit inconvenient facts and even advocate deceit for the “greater good,” excommunicated for Arian beliefs but later rehabilitated by Constantine, who becomes Pontifex Maximus and uses Eusebius to advance a Judeo Christian narrative. The Council of Nicaea (May 20–June 19, in March of the same year) supposedly unites the empire under Judeo Christianity, with Constantine ordering confiscation and destruction of Cairo Christian property, torching Bibles, and transferring wealth to the new church. Demnatio Memoriae targets Marcion and his first Bible, and within six years Constantine issues 50 copies of Eusebius’s revised Judeo‑Christian Bible, which staples the Torah and alters Paul’s epistles, becoming the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church, signaling a wholesale hijacking of doctrine in a span of twenty-nine days. The narrative closes with “And now you know.”

In the early twelve hundreds, Pope Innocent the third launched the fourth crusade not to reclaim Jerusalem, but to strike at the heart of Christianity itself, Constantinople. The Venetians saw an opportunity and turned the Crusade to their own ends. Put me on the throne and I will reward you with gold. The Crusaders agreed. In 12:03, they reached Constantinople. The city fell and Alexios Angelos took the crown, but he could not deliver what he promised. The people revolted. The new emperor opposed the Crusaders and war became inevitable. Then in April '4 came the catastrophe. The Crusaders breached the walls. For three days, they looted the greatest city in Christendom. Churches were destroyed. Icons shattered. Crusaders rode horses through Hagia Sophia. Gold, relics, and sacred manuscripts were loaded onto Venetian ships.

The speaker claims the Catholic Church's relationship with Muslims is part of their plan of salvation, as stated in the Catholic Catechism. They profess Muslims hold the faith of Abraham and together adore one merciful God. According to the speaker, the Catholic Church started Islam to regain the Holy Land. They funded and trained Mohammed and sent a Catholic nun to marry a Muslim and raise an army to take back the Holy Land for the Catholic Church. The plan initially worked, but Islam became too powerful and independent. The speaker believes most Muslims are unaware that their religion originated as a front for the Catholic Church.

During the collapse of the Roman Empire, Constantine restructured it by controlling history and religion. The empire shifted from nonmonotheistic to monotheistic, persecuting non-Christians and destroying ancient groups like the gnostics. The library at Alexandria was burned, and ancient civilizations were eradicated to erase echoes of the past. This led to the Dogon people settling in Mali due to religious persecution. The Roman Empire's actions, including the crusades, aimed to eliminate pre-Christian influences.

Speaker 0: The speaker discusses content from the Catholic Catechism and a separate critical perspective on Islam. They cite that the Catholic Catechism states the church's relationship with Muslims is part of the plan of salvation, and that Muslims acknowledge the creator, with the first place among whom they are included being the Muslims. They quote: “They profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us, they adore the one merciful God.” They then promote a small comic book called The Prophet by Jack Chick, noting it is available from their ministry for about $2. The speaker uses The Prophet to claim that Catholics started Islam. According to this view, Catholics “started the whole religion,” purposely to recover the holy land for the Catholics. The narrative claims Catholics built up Islam, funded Mohammed, trained him, and even sent a Catholic nun out of a monastery to find a young promising Muslim, marry him, and train him to raise an army of Arabs to take back the holy land for the mother church. The speaker acknowledges this as an interesting story to read if someone wants to explore it further. They assert that it began to work, but eventually Islam grew so large that the Catholics were abandoned by Muslims. The speaker concludes with a generalization, stating that the current global Muslim population—now estimated by the speaker as “10%, 20% of the world population”—is largely unaware that “they really started off as a front for the Catholic church.”

The speaker claims the Catholic Church's relationship with Muslims is part of their plan of salvation, as stated in the Catholic catechism 841. According to the speaker, the Catholic Church started Islam to regain the Holy Land. They allege the Church funded and trained Mohammed and sent a Catholic nun to marry a Muslim and raise an army to take back the Holy Land. The speaker says this plan initially worked, but Islam grew too large and became independent. The speaker believes most Muslims are unaware that their religion originated as a front for the Catholic Church.

I'm currently studying Catholicism to grasp how a religion with Jewish roots, born from the Torah and a Jewish rabbi, evolved to persecute Jews for not converting. This history includes pogroms, burnings, and accusations, and now, figures like Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens are using Catholicism to attack Jews again. I'm reading Bishop Robert Barron's "Catholicism" to understand this better, but the very first paragraph presents a core Christian claim: that God became human. This is the point we Jews were historically slaughtered for rejecting. The Torah, Catholicism's foundation, strictly forbids idolatry, the worship of any physical form. So, when Catholic extremists attack Jews for not accepting Jesus as God, it's perplexing, as the Torah deems the concept of God becoming human as heresy.

Every day, new Christian denominations emerge, making it hard to keep track. Here’s a quick guide to some major ones: Catholics, known for their rules and Marian saints, dominated for 1500 years until Luther's reformation. Anglicans are like Catholics with a twist, while Episcopalians are a step further down the line. Methodists broke away from Anglicans, keeping traditions but adding their own flavor. Baptists are for those who dislike dancing and modern music, with some churches trying to modernize. Evangelicals and nondenominational churches are essentially undercover Baptists. Lutherans combine aspects of Catholicism and Protestantism, with a quirky membership requirement of being older and living in Lake Wobegon.

The Ukraine war did not start in 2022 as often portrayed, but in 2014. The conflict's roots go back to the failure to build on Gorbachev's vision of a common European home post-1990. The US pursued a unipolar world view, believing it won the Cold War, when in reality, Gorbachev initiated the end of the conflict. The war's origins are heavily debated, with differing perspectives on why it began.