TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"Can you clarify what kind of protest, president Trump does support or find acceptable?" "President absolutely supports peaceful protest." "He supports the first amendment." "He supports the right of Americans to make their voices heard." "He does not support violence of any kind." "He does not support assaulting law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their job." "It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not." "Unfortunately, for Democrats, that line has not been made clear, and they've allowed this unrest and this violence to continue, and the president has had to step in." "What question?" "So if there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the militant parade, president Trump would allow that?" "Of course, the president supports peaceful protests." "What a stupid question. Raquel."

We need to avoid confrontation with the police and make sure this doesn't become a big story. Let's peacefully march to the other side of the stage where we can speak and occupy. Please spread the word and tell everyone to join us on the other side. We don't want any violence like what happened at Kent State. We're here to save the republic. Thank you and please march to the other side.

There was no violence, shooting, or killing, even from those disagreeing with peaceful protest. Martial law was called despite the absence of violence. The speaker urges listeners not to assume violence occurred simply because the National Guard was present, stating they were on the street and know this firsthand. The speaker went from downtown detention back into the community, discussing events in Paramount, Compton, and Inglewood. The speaker implores the audience to get the facts straight and not solely rely on secondhand accounts or limited incidents they might have witnessed.

The people united cannot be divided. When they try to divide us, we can't be divided. What we're seeing now is what happens when they try.

I understand your frustration over the election, but we must maintain peace and order. It's a tough time, but we can't let them win. Please go home peacefully. We appreciate you, but violence is not the answer.

I understand your pain over the election being stolen, but we must have peace and respect law and order. We can't give in to those who want to cause harm. Please go home peacefully. We appreciate you, but it's important to maintain peace.

We're not fighting or protesting. It takes time, not a miracle. Murder? Just kidding. They'll understand. That's the worst. Let me explain.

To effectively create change in the world we desire. And side prop will argue that at times there's simply nothing else that can be required other than violent retaliation. And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with. This view the view that some institutions are too broken, too regressive, too oppressive to be reformed like cancers of our society. They must and they should be taken down by any means necessary.

I acknowledge your pain over the election being stolen, which was a landslide victory. It's crucial that we maintain peace, law, and order. We don't want anyone to get hurt. This is an unprecedented time where they took away our victory. Although the election was fraudulent, we must not play into their hands. Please go home peacefully. We love you and appreciate you. You've witnessed the mistreatment of others who are wicked. I understand your emotions, but it's time to go home and find peace.

I acknowledge your pain. The election was stolen from us, despite being a landslide victory. It's crucial that we maintain peace, law, and order. We must respect our people and avoid causing harm. This is an unprecedented time where they could take away our democracy. Although the election was fraudulent, we shouldn't play into their hands. Please go home peacefully. We love you and understand your frustration, but it's important to prioritize peace.

To effectively create change in the world we desire. And side prop will argue that at times there's simply nothing else that can be required other than violent retaliation. And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with. This view the view that some institutions are too broken, too regressive, too oppressive to be reformed like cancers of our society. They must and they should be taken down by any means necessary.

President Trump supports peaceful protest and the right of Americans to make their voices heard. He does not support violence or assaulting law enforcement officers. The speaker claims the president has made his position clear, unlike the Democrats, who have allowed unrest and violence to continue, requiring the president to intervene. When asked if President Trump would allow peaceful protests on Saturday for the militant parade, the speaker affirmed the president supports peaceful protests, calling the question stupid.

I want to talk about peace, not imposed by force, but real peace that allows nations to thrive and build a better future. Peace for all, not just for Americans. Peace that brings hope and prosperity for everyone. Peace that is essential for a meaningful life.

I understand your frustration, but we need to accept the election results and prioritize peace and lawfulness. It's a difficult time, but we must not give in to those who want to cause harm. Please go home peacefully. We appreciate you and want to avoid any further harm. We've witnessed the mistreatment of others, but let's choose peace.

At the core of the left, at the core of a liberal, is someone that would use the sword if they had it. They are very violent people at their core. They always have it. They can't debate. They can't have conversation. So they'll resort to these tactics. They're gonna do everything they possibly can to try to murder this movement because they can't beat us. So they're gonna try to take weapons. And now we're very aware of that. I'm aware of it. We have to have full time security. This is not a joke. This is who these people are.

First speaker: Has America ever engaged in a general strike? Like, that’s enough. We’re not showing up to work tomorrow? Second speaker: We’ve never had a general strike. But this Friday on January twenty-third, there is an ice out of Minnesota, day of action. It’s a shutdown day where people will be staying home from work, refusing to participate in economic activities. So a power and they’re calling on Americans across the country to show solidarity. First speaker: One of the problems with Minnesota right now is you have people like Kristi Noem or the people who are heading up ICE saying that it’s not nonviolent resistance. They’re saying someone like Renee Good was actually a threat to those people or that filming an ICE agent—or documenting, which is perfectly legal—is a form of threat, and therefore they justify using violence in return to the threat of violence from these people. What do you do when what your nonviolent action is perceived as violence by the people who can use violence against you? Second speaker: Declaring peaceful protesters violent or domestic terrorists or outside agitators is what autocrats all around the world do. That is their playbook, is to make people fearful and to try to undermine the legitimacy of protesters. So what are we seeing in Minneapolis right now? What have we seen in our history in this country? Think about the civil rights movement, profound state violence used against protesters. They prepared, they trained, they role played, they organized all to make that political violence backfire. Think of Selma, the peaceful march. So when peaceful disciplined protesters confronted the dogs, the hoses, the response—It revealed the cruelty when the disciplined protesters were faced with this form of violence. And so that’s how disciplined nonviolent resistance can make state violence repression backfire.

The speaker emphasizes the need for de-escalation of the ongoing violence.

Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. I apologize for my previous comments. We should not engage in any violent behavior. However, we should still gather at the Capitol. I didn't expect to say this, but we need to make our voices heard. We should be cautious though, as we don't want to get arrested or harmed. Let's stand together and make a peaceful statement.

I acknowledge your pain over the election being stolen, which was a landslide victory. It is crucial that we prioritize peace, law, and order. We must protect our people and ensure no harm comes to anyone. This is an unprecedented situation where our democracy has been undermined. However, we cannot fall into the trap set by our opponents. Please go home peacefully, knowing that we appreciate and value you. We have witnessed the mistreatment of others, but it is important to maintain peace.

You don't want riots or violence, correct? As Dr. King said, riots are the voice of the unheard. If people are oppressed, they may lash out. But do you condemn violence? I believe in self-defense. If a police officer unjustifiably kills someone, I understand why people react. So you won't condemn riots or burning buildings after police incidents? I won't condone it, but I understand the reaction. When Osama bin Laden attacked, did you suggest a peaceful response? I answered your question. People are burning businesses in New York City, and you won't answer. I don't promote it, but I won't condemn it. That's cowardly. No, you're the coward. God bless you, I'm leaving. Yeah, you are.

I acknowledge the pain caused by the stolen election. Despite it being a fraudulent election, we must prioritize peace and law and order. We don't want anyone to get hurt. This is an unprecedented time where our democracy has been challenged. However, we must not play into the hands of those responsible. Please go home peacefully, knowing that we love and appreciate you. We have witnessed the mistreatment of others, but it's important to maintain peace.

I asked everyone in the US government to stay peaceful and avoid violence. We are the party that values law and order, so let's respect our law enforcement. There is a video that I want you to watch.

I don't need to tell my supporters that there will be no violence; they are not violent people. I don't want any violence, and my supporters share that belief. These are good people who stand for peace. Unlike your question implies, they believe in non-violence.

When urging people to take action, I often emphasize the word "peacefully." This is not just to prevent incidents like January 6, but also to counter any misinterpretations of my intentions. My approach is to be positive, armed with data and facts, and to treat everyone with love and respect. This mindset attracts a supportive community.

I emphasize the word "peacefully" when urging action to prevent misunderstandings or misinterpretations. My approach is to remain positive, present data and facts, and treat everyone with love and respect. This attitude resonates with many people, and as a result, I have a strong following.