TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Justin Leslie, a whistleblower from Pfizer, reveals explosive information in an interview with Project Veritas. He discusses conversations with Pfizer employees about the mRNA vaccines and their side effects. The employees admit that mRNA vaccines have been known to have side effects for years and that Pfizer and Moderna used the emergency of the pandemic to push through the vaccines. They also discuss the lack of proper clinical trials and the use of the emergency authorization to bypass normal procedures. Leslie questions why safer vaccine formulations were not explored and highlights concerns about the impact on menstrual cycles and fertility. He also raises suspicions about the presence of graphene oxide in the vaccines. Leslie criticizes James O'Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, for burying the more significant information he provided.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted on hidden camera that the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He claimed the typical testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models instead of undergoing extensive clinical trials. The scientist stated that the government "kinda made a deal with pharmaceutical companies" to solve the problem. He also discussed weighing potential side effects against the benefits for consumers, suggesting a different standard for cancer patients, as they are "gonna die anyway." The CDC has announced they are pulling the J&J vaccine from use in the United States.

Speaker 0 described a guest whose 18-year-old daughter was injected with Pfizer and developed cancer. He stated that he has sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections, with some deaths immediate and others gruesome, and that these people must testify to lawmakers and others recounting their stories repeatedly. He framed this as a massive crime that needs to stop. He asserted that the FDA was fully aware that these injections would cause cancer, citing published guidance documents. He claimed that the FDA regulates the industry and, in 2015 and 2013 (and even more recently), wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers developing mRNA products that they must study risks, including cancer, death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, and cardiovascular issues. He said these risks were documented as regulatory knowledge and that manufacturers were told they had to study these risks and exclude them. He also claimed that studying these risks in healthy volunteers was not allowed because it was considered unethical. He contrasted this with 2020, stating that “all of a sudden, all of this is solved,” calling it a joke, and that this period raised his suspicions, prompting him to investigate independently. He concluded by describing the situation as a premeditated crime in which regulators knew, and that the military conducted a “fake exercise” to capture all these pharmaceutical companies and compel them to create these weapons.

The speaker claims Pfizer documents reveal the COVID vaccines didn't work to stop the virus a month after rollout in November 2020. They allege Pfizer knew the third most common side effect was COVID. Within months, Pfizer supposedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker asserts Pfizer and the FDA knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this wasn't disclosed to parents until August 2021. The speaker states the CDC initially claimed the injection materials stayed at the injection site, but Pfizer knew they biodistributed throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. Pathologist Dr. Robert Chandler allegedly found no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

They didn't see safety signals because they didn't want to see them and wouldn't report them. They lied about the vaccine staying in the arm, when they knew it wouldn't. They said the mRNA would dissolve in hours or days, but they knew it was modified RNA that stayed in the body with the spike protein. They continue to push this, despite evidence to the contrary. The science has been corrupted and the agencies have been corrupted, so they have no credibility.

Many people who have received mRNA injections for COVID-19 may die within 3 to 5 years, even with just one dose. These mRNA vaccines were rushed into clinical trials without going through the usual testing phases. Normally, vaccines would go through phase one, phase two, and phase three trials, but these vaccines skipped phase two and went straight to phase three, which involves injecting the entire population. More than 60,000 people have died during these trials, and adverse events such as heart problems and organ failure have been reported. This is a dangerous experiment happening in real time on real people, including children and pregnant women. It is important to be honest and inform people about the risks involved.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab route models to "see if it works." He acknowledged the lack of research done on the products and stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. Rees also discussed weighing the worst potential side effects against the benefits, stating, "Cancer patient's gonna die anyway," so the focus is on quality of life. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use, but Rees was aware of its ineffectiveness. When confronted on camera, Rees initially denied his identity.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He claimed the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. According to Rees, "we basically just had a race to figure out who could solve it best. People wanted it. We gave it to them." He also stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and lab route models were used instead. Rees described a risk-benefit analysis where potential side effects were weighed against the perceived benefit, even in cases where patients, like those with cancer, were already facing a terminal prognosis. Confronted on camera, Rees initially denied his identity and then evaded questions. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the United States.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just threw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. Rees stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and testing was limited to lab models. He acknowledged potential side effects, stating that the risk was weighed against the benefit, using cancer patients as an example where quality of life was prioritized over curing the disease. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and evaded questions. The investigation aims to expose corruption and lies in government, corporations, and the pharmaceutical industry.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted that the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He claimed the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models instead. The scientist stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. He also discussed weighing the worst potential side effects against the benefits for consumers, suggesting a different standard for cancer patients, who were "gonna die anyway." The CDC has previously announced they're pulling the J&J vaccine from use in The United States. J&J claims this is due to the vaccine's declining use and the company's strategic shift away from the vaccines.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was bypassed, and the vaccine was tested on lab models to "see if it works." He acknowledged the lack of research and the potential for side effects, stating that for cancer patients, the focus was on quality of life rather than a cure. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the United States, which J&J claims is due to declining use and a strategic shift. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into a restroom.

A Pfizer whistleblower has revealed documents indicating over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from December 2020 to February 2021, including serious issues like spontaneous abortions. It is claimed that the FDA was aware of these reactions and sought to keep the documents hidden for 75 years, suggesting intentional harm. The whistleblower argues that the vaccine remains on the market despite serious concerns, highlighting a double standard compared to previous vaccine removals for fewer adverse events. There is a call for accountability for those involved in this situation.

you were promoted to the FDA classifies the vaccine as a drug. You were told it was safe. You were told it was effective. Mister Fauci, you made the statement that none of these shots will prevent transmission. You also stated that none of these shots will prevent you from getting the virus. So you're telling the people to take a shot that will will not prevent you from getting the virus and that will not prevent you from transmitting the virus if you do get it. The ultimate agenda is two things. One profit, which we all know is the pharmaceutical companies and agencies middle name. The word pharmaceutical comes from the Greek word pharmakia, which is in the bible. Pharmakia means sorcery and or witchcraft. You are now and have been experimented on. The Johnson and Johnson shot has aborted fetal tissue from aborted babies from the retina, as well as the kidney cells. Johnson and Johnson, you playing too much. You had over twenty five thousand cases of cancer racking up to over $4,000,000,000 of lawsuits. Why should we trust Moderna, the youngest one in the group? Ain't never created no vaccine, and this is not even a vaccine. We are getting banged on by institutions at high levels. We ain't got nothing on them.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated due to job mandates. The government claimed vaccines were safe and effective, but data showed vaccinated people could still carry the virus. Despite promises of freedom, there have been 1 million adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines, with only 11 compensated cases. Big Pharma has immunity from liability for vaccine injuries.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

The speaker states that they believed Pfizer had two legal definitions for their jab for nefarious reasons, suspecting one would be used for FDA approval while the other, containing SV40, would be released to the public. This suspicion stems from the 1950s polio vaccine contamination with SV40. The speaker recounts how Dr. Ochsner tested the polio vaccine on his grandchildren, resulting in one death and one case of polio. Ochsner then alerted the "industrial military complex" to the problem. Dr. Bernice Eddy at the NIH discovered SV40 contamination in the polio vaccines but was silenced after revealing it. The speaker distrusted the COVID response due to this history and suspected Pfizer's use of the SV40 promoter. Kevin McKernan later tested expired vials and found SV40, suggesting a deliberate scheme to harm people who received the jab.

The speaker claims the Biden administration covered up science related to the COVID shot. Information related to vaccine complications was allegedly censored as COVID vaccine hesitant content. The speaker alleges the heart inflammation in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been, resulting in thousands of kids developing myocarditis unnecessarily. The speaker suggests the administration knew the shot didn't stop transmission but kept it secret. The head of the FDA is cited as saying the Biden administration suppressed information about myocarditis damage to children. The speaker believes this sounds criminal, especially considering mandates for school, work, and travel.

The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for its ability to stop the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. The speaker acknowledges that they had to work quickly to understand the situation and move at the speed of science.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. Rees stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models to "see if it works." He also said that the lack of research should not be surprising. According to Rees, the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. He also stated that when considering side effects, the company weighs the worst possible outcome against the potential benefit, even if it means accepting that "cancer patients gonna die anyway." When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into the women's restroom.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and testing was limited to lab route models. Rees stated that the government and pharmaceutical companies were in a race to solve the problem. He also said that the worst possible side effect was weighed against the benefit to the consumer, and in the case of cancer patients, quality of life was prioritized over curing anything. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the US, citing declining use and a strategic shift by the company. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into a women's restroom.

Pfizer's claim of 96% efficacy for their vaccine was questioned. The study and data were not independently verified, and Pfizer wanted to keep the data hidden for 75 years. The true effectiveness of the vaccine, based on absolute risk reduction, is less than 1%. More people died and were harmed in their trials compared to the placebo group. The vaccine's safety was questionable from the start, and it is not effective. Additionally, appropriate studies were not conducted for new variants.

Pfizer knew a month into the rollout, November 2020, that this vaccine did not work to stop COVID. Everything that followed—the mandates, the lost jobs, the closures, children not allowed back to school if they didn’t take the shot, the armed forces compelled to take it, pilots compelled—was built on a lie of vaccine efficacy. The most common side effect of getting vaccinated is COVID, and Pfizer understood that the vaccine’s efficacy and vaccine failure showed it did not stop COVID. They also knew the injection did not stay in the deltoid. Europeans through the EMA and public health entities described side effects as chills, fever, fatigue, needing to lie down, but Pfizer knew that was a lie. In Pfizer documents, charts show that the materials—the spike protein, the mRNA, the lipid nanoparticles, and polyethylene glycol—biodistribute within forty-eight hours and leave the injection site to biodistribute to major organs throughout the body, crossing the blood-brain barrier. This may have contributed to personality changes in some loved ones who took the injection. They also accumulate in the liver, the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and in women, the ovaries. The first injection accumulates in ovaries; the second injection more so. Experts could not find any mechanism whereby this material left the body in either gender. By the first booster, surgeries on vaccinated women reported fully blocked ovaries, among other damage. Pfizer knew that. They also hired 2,400 full-time staff to process reports of serious adverse events, starting to receive them during the 2020-2021 period. In Pfizer documents, over forty-two thousand serious adverse events were tallied from November 2020 to February 2021, with many individuals experiencing multiple events. The top documented side effects included myalgia (muscle pain), followed by joint pain, then COVID itself, and then a catastrophic tally of serious side effects including heart damage (myocarditis, pericarditis), problems with the aorta, thrombotic events (blood clots in various locations), neurological events (tremors, Guillain-Barré, dementia, epilepsy-like seizures), autoimmune disorders, and eye damage including blindness. Reproductive damage was noted: miscarriages and other issues. Twelve hundred deaths in three months were recorded as not statistically random; they were old with prior conditions, yet doctors noted causality concerns and recorded them. Pfizer knew by April 2021 that minors were injured by the vaccine, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis. Minors sustained heart damage, with thirty-five minors affected. The Israeli Ministry of Health warned the CDC and the Biden administration about minor heart damage, but FOIA requests later showed active conversations up to the White House regarding myocarditis in minors. Instead of withdrawing or advising parents, a 17-page document was produced as a script to persuade parents to vaccinate their minors, supplemented by a TikTok influencer campaign encouraging young people to get injected. These communications indicated that kids would sustain deadly heart damage, and still proceeded. Senator Ron Johnson is using the work to unredact those documents and hold hearings about the cover-up. Pfizer knew all of these things.