reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 gave the FBI a thumb drive containing 29 minutes of high-definition video showing two men attacking a building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. Speaker 0 states that despite going through over 725 indictments, none of their video or even a single still picture of either man has appeared on the Internet. The FBI is allegedly refusing to take Speaker 0's calls, return emails, or accept an offer to meet. Speaker 0 believes the FBI is hiding these men. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to inquire about the identities of these men. Speaker 0 confirms that Ben Grundler has all this information and that they have been in contact for over a year.

Speaker 0 raises the question of CIA involvement in drug trafficking, referencing a past discussion with former Tel Aviv CIA chief of station Susan Miller and noting a reminder about Iran-Contra. They ask why the CIA would be intimately involved with drug trafficking, and mention Candace Owens discussing it in relation to the Charlie Kirk assassination. Speaker 1 answers that trafficking in drugs allows the CIA to get closer to the targets they want to reach. They point to a popular Netflix series, Narcos, which follows the hunt for Pablo Escobar, the Cali cartel, and other major cartels. They claim that, in the show, and in real life, every time the Drug Enforcement Administration gets close to its primary target, the CIA station chief steps in and ruins the investigation. They state that this happens because the CIA doesn’t care about drugs. Speaker 1 continues that the CIA cares about terrorism and communism, implying there are always some other bigger ideological concerns. Therefore, the CIA is “perfectly happy” to allow cocaine to flood into the United States in the 1980s during the Iran-Contra period, just as it was “perfectly happy” to allow Afghanistan to provide 93% of the world’s heroin once the United States began its occupation of Afghanistan.

There is speculation about Maxwell Yurek from Arizona being linked to a white van at a Trump rally. The van had Arizona plates and is connected to Yurek Armoury Explosives. A conversation with a person at Yurek's residence did not provide any clear answers about his whereabouts or involvement. The individual denied knowing Maxwell and refused to discuss further details. The video ends with unanswered questions and suspicions about Yurek's potential role in the events.

In this video, the speaker discusses three murder attempts and points out that Aaron and Dave in O'Keefe were present each time. The speaker mentions that they were aware of the attempts before leaving and that the FBI has evidence of this. They also suggest a connection to a drug cartel. The speaker mentions O'Connell's involvement in the investigation.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters who were present. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the individuals responsible for planting pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then analyzes a recently released video showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered, raising questions about the authorities' lack of concern and the involvement of the Secret Service. They also mention the failure of the media to cover this story and the suspicious actions of Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. The transcript ends with an update revealing that the person who alerted the police about the bomb was a plainclothes officer with the Capitol Police.

Speaker 0 admits to being paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they suggest it was part of an organized effort.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

In this video, the speaker discusses a suspicious situation involving a woman who works at the Rio Grande Valley Catholic facility in McAllen, Texas. The woman has been transporting children, including babies, from the facility to the airport. The speaker and his team followed her and noticed some odd behavior, such as her claiming the children were hers and then handing them off to other women. They also discovered that she was now driving a taxi, but when they called the number on the cab, they were told it wasn't a cab company. The speaker believes there is something sinister happening and calls for a serious investigation.

The meeting begins with Speaker 0 welcoming engineers and first responders and expressing hope they will help the people affected by a complex rescue situation. They reference having arrived at the scene and discuss that it looks “very complicated.” Speaker 1 provides factual background about the collapse of the 12-story Champlain Tower South building in Surfside just before 01:30 in the morning on 06/24/2021, noting that ninety eight people died. Speaker 1 says the investigation used aerial photographs, building maintenance records, eyewitness reports, and studies of what was discovered below the ground. Speaker 0 then asks how a café in Beach, Miami relates to the Surfside condo, stating that John McAfee’s residence was at the Surfside condo. Speaker 0 claims that John McAfee was found dead in his prison cell the same day he learned he was being extradited back to the US to stand trial, and that three hours later, at 01:30 in the morning on 06/25/2021, the Surfside condo—described as containing information from McAfee’s residence—was demolished. Speaker 0 says the IDF was sent from Israel to investigate the Surfside condo and asks why the investigation would be conducted “other than to report back that all of the evidence was destroyed.” Speaker 0 recounts traveling to Miami “all the time,” and on one occasion bringing “two hard drives and 20 g’s cash” in a Manila envelope. Speaker 0 says the day after this, in an SUV with bodyguards, John McAfee placed his hand on Speaker 0’s lap, looked him in the eyes, and said that if he died or was found dead for any reason whatsoever, he did not kill himself. Speaker 0 claims McAfee said that if that happened, the two gentlemen who received the cash and the two hard drives were supposed to release information, described as a “dead man switch,” otherwise the information would not be released. Speaker 0 then questions why the two hard drives or the information were not released after the condo was demolished, claiming the condo’s destruction occurred mysteriously and asserting that everyone connected to h I l a r and their “cronies” dies. Speaker 0 concludes by saying that if something happens to them or their account, they may return to mercenary work because it would be “a lot safer,” and ends by stating “Way more to come.”

Speaker 0 identifies as a fellow marine and speaks with urgency about orders he feels compelled to follow. He asserts that people are getting hurt and links this to a broader issue: weapons and military equipment from the United States being sold over the border in Mexico to cartels. He claims he has been able to prove this wrongdoing and says that, as a result, he is supposed to return to the master chief petty officer of the Navy. He describes a specific observation to substantiate the claim: boats that originated from a SEAL boat installation have been seen around the border area. He mentions a location—Industrial Plaza near Food for Less—and states that navy boats, which he attributes to the SEAL boat installation, have been taken apart and transported across the border. He emphasizes that all of this equipment is moving across the border and insists he is not lying. The speaker acknowledges his status as a former marine and expresses concern about the implications of these actions. He conveys a belief that if cartel members obtain and repurpose this equipment, they could use it against the United States, a scenario that would require far more than luck to counter. He reinforces that more substantial measures than luck will be necessary to address the threat he describes. He closes by wishing the listener luck, while reiterating the seriousness of the situation and his need to act on his orders. He signs off with “Thank you so much. Godspeed.”

Leonel Oleo Moreno, a sergeant from Digesín, previously known as DIN, was sent by the government to sabotage law-abiding Venezuelans in this country. He lied about his age, falsified documents, and tarnished the image of good Venezuelans here. He was paid by the government to cause this disaster. Another individual is being monitored, and once the information is confirmed, they will be exposed and detained. Leo, the sergeant from Digesín, will provide more updates soon. Translation: Leonel Oleo Moreno, Sergeant Leo Moreno from Digesín, previously known as DIN, was sent by the government to sabotage law-abiding Venezuelans in this country. He lied about his age, falsified documents, and tarnished the image of good Venezuelans here. He was paid by the government to cause this disaster. Another individual is being monitored, and once the information is confirmed, they will be exposed and detained. Leo, the sergeant from Digesín, will provide more updates soon.

The speaker learned about an incident involving their colleague, Vlad Lander, a government controller, and found the video of it shocking. The speaker felt the need to come and check on Lander's whereabouts and intervene. According to the speaker, Vlad Lander faces no charges, as they have been dropped, and he is now a free man.

Maria Zak, from Nations in Action, discusses alleged foreign interference affecting U.S. elections, presenting secondhand intelligence and personal testimony to support claims of a coordinated global operation. Key assertions and narrative: - The Italian Secret Service reportedly received information from Arturo’s girlfriend (who considers him a husband) whose uncle is part of Italian intelligence. She said Arturo came home and questioned why America’s election was being stolen, prompting an investigation by Leonardo after conversations with Arturo. Arturo allegedly confesses, and Italian intelligence claims to be watching a coup d'etat in the United States. - Two affidavits from Italian citizens were delivered to Congress. Italian intelligence agencies reportedly attempted to reach out because their country had fallen, and they describe worldwide corruption with China buying off politicians, influencing and using fraud to control countries and property. - Maria Zak plans to play an audio tape she says should shock America. She notes she has testified before and asserts credentials in government affairs. She argues that Kansas was a pro-Trump elector victor but contends the “real result” of the election is unknown to the public, along with undisclosed happenings in Italy. - Alleged movements related to Leonardo, a defense contracting firm, are described: people moving from Frankfurt to the Italian US embassy in Rome (Via Veneto) supposedly to collaborate with Leonardo to alter the U.S. election results. She claims 47 to 52 presidential elections globally and more than 200 telemetry experts speaking various languages, framing this as a calculated effort to topple presidencies and control countries. - An audio recording is presented from an individual described as a former CIA and State Department member named Larry Johnson. Johnson purportedly explains efforts to contact a lawyer, arrangements to extradite an individual (Arturo Delia) who would testify, and a plan involving witness protection and an airplane; Johnson urges Maria Zak to contact him. - Zak asserts that this “transcript” demonstrates proof and calls for immediate investigations by local, state, and federal law enforcement into Larry Johnson’s activities in the United States during the event. She emphasizes the “if you see something, say something” principle and states witnesses filed many affidavits. - Specific Georgia-related voting irregularities are cited: over 35,000 illegal cross-county votes, with cross-reference to state documents and USPS data showing voters did not reside where they voted; claims of fake residences, photocopied ballots, stacks fed into tabulators, and many fake, unfolded absentee ballots. She notes zero arrests among the thousands of affidavits filed by Nations in Action. - Individuals connected to the alleged international plot are named: Stefano Serafini (a former state department member who allegedly retired days before the election to avoid consequences), General Claudio Graziano (EU commander at the time), Ignacio Moncada (CEO of FATA SPA, a Leonardo subsidiary), and Charles Robinson (a telemetry expert who allegedly uploaded Mil-Spec software a week before the election and traveled from Frankfurt). Zak states they met at the Saint Regis Hotel to coordinate the plan and claims the Italian intelligence services provided her with Graziano’s go-order cellphone number.

Speaker 0: Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss the events of a fateful day. Speaker 1 expresses concern about the lack of public fear and urges action. Speaker 0 emphasizes the need for justice and accountability, regardless of the protesters' motives. They agree to frame the protesters and take strict measures, including a shoot-to-kill order. The video suggests that political power brokers are manipulating the narrative to protect their interests, raising questions about the extent they will go to safeguard themselves.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

Speaker 0 accuses the video of being part of a propaganda effort to support the genocide of Palestine. Speaker 1 tries to interrupt but Speaker 0 insists that the video is fake. Speaker 1 mentions a scenario where someone's friend goes missing and people don't help, but Speaker 0 dismisses it. Speaker 2 claims that the video is meant to help bring people home. Speaker 0 repeats their name and says they just voted. Speaker 1 states that the discussion has nothing to do with Speaker 0. Speaker 0 mentions that the police are coming.

The speaker discusses Maxwell Yurek from Arizona, claiming a white GMC van with Arizona plates towed from the Trump rally in Pennsylvania after a shooting is tied to him. The speaker urges viewers to Google Yurek's name, noting information is being scrubbed. The speaker claims Yurek is connected to Yurek Armoury Explosives in East Mesa, Arizona, and that Google searches for the company reveal a residence. The speaker and his brother drove to the residence and spoke to a woman there. The speaker presents a video of the encounter, where he asks the woman if Max is present. The woman initially claims not to know any Max Yurek or Yerling. The speaker identifies himself as Tyson Draper, a missing person investigator, and asks about a missing person report for Yurek. The woman denies knowledge of this. She acknowledges being part of the family but claims to have "no say on anything" and denies knowledge of the van.

Biden is being called a criminal due to allegations surrounding his laptop. The speaker insists that Biden is a long-time criminal and criticizes the media for not reporting on it. The speaker repeatedly refers to the media as criminals as well. The video ends with a sarcastic wish for good luck.

Speaker 0 claims to have video footage from January 6th of two federal agents attacking the Capitol. Speaker 0 states they have been trying to get the FBI to investigate for over a year, providing them with twenty-nine minutes of high-definition footage. Speaker 0 says the FBI has not arrested the agents, nor have their images appeared online. Speaker 0 claims the FBI refuses to accept a statement or view video from January 5th, 6th, and 7th. Speaker 1 says the FBI raided them twice, came to their home, and took their phones. Speaker 1 advises Speaker 0 to avoid the FBI if possible.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the person or people who planted pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then introduces new surveillance footage released by Capitol Police, showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered. They describe the video, pointing out the lack of concern from law enforcement and the Secret Service, as well as the proximity of the bomb to VP-elect Kamala Harris. The speaker raises questions about the identity of the person who alerted authorities to the bomb and the subsequent cover-up.

Speaker 1 asks about a 2024 reelection video in which the speaker promised to show no mercy on the cartels and to employ every military asset to combat them, and to expose all bribes and corruptions involving politicians and the cartels. Speaker 0 confirms, saying they are pursuing that course. They mention investigating where money comes from, noting a recent weekend “garbage deal” as embarrassing to the opposition and that the crowds were not large. They observe that the signs for the protests—yellow and blue—appear professionally made, as if produced in a printing shop, suggesting someone is paying for them. They acknowledge they do not mind protest and sometimes protest themselves, but claim some protesters are “professional agitators” being paid, implying there is a source behind them. Speaker 0 states they have a lot of information about who these agitators are and that the public will be very surprised when they find out who is paying them.

In the video, the speaker mentions various pieces of intelligence that were not included in assessments regarding the Capitol attack. These include plans to harm palace guards, use chemicals at entry points, burn down the Supreme Court, attack members of Congress, and storm the building. The speaker's intelligence unit even released documents indicating a low probability of civil disobedience. Speaker 1 suggests that certain agencies may have allowed the chaos at the Capitol to serve their political purposes and prevented the speaker from stopping it.

The video shows a man pointing out a person who appears to be a protester but is actually an undercover federal agent. They communicate through hand signals, confirming the infiltration. The speaker emphasizes the idea of total infiltration and suggests the entire situation is a setup.

Speaker 1 says that after watching an 11-minute video on the day of Jeffrey Epstein’s death, they noticed “inconsistencies” based on door and guard height. They claim the jail door is about six foot six inches, the guard appears about six foot three, and that the guard spends time in a “suspicious” manner leaving a bag hanging out of the garbage before leaving. Speaker 1 then claims a person leaving the cell next appears about six foot even with a “white skin complexion,” and asks who that person is, describing his head placement and walk. Speaker 2 says they watched Jeffrey Epstein walk out of jail, then claims he was in a bulletproof armored truck with government plates and was on his way. Speaker 1 adds that after Epstein’s surgery heals, “you get this,” introducing “Palm Beach Pete.” Speaker 4 identifies himself as “Palm Beach Pete” from Palm Beach, Florida, explicitly stating, “I’m so not Jeffrey Epstein,” and saying he is Peter, has nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein, that Epstein is a “very bad person” who is dead while he is alive, and insisting he is not Jeffrey Epstein. He repeats: “You’re not Jeffrey Epstein? I’m not Jeffrey Epstein.” Speaker 5 states that the real “Palm Beach Pete” is Peter, known as Palm Beach Pete on YouTube and social media, and discusses why someone might say they are Palm Beach Pete when asked if they are Epstein. Speaker 5 then asks whether Palm Beach Pete has ever been in contact with Jeffrey Epstein. Speaker 3 responds “Never,” but says it is “a little bit deceptive,” then asks a series of questions including pizza and the Clintons in the 1990s, claiming breathing indicates a lie. Speaker 3 asks whether Palm Beach Pete has ever been to an Epstein party, stating: “I was at a party and he was at that party,” concluding “yes.” Speaker 3 also asks about facial surgeries, saying “Never,” and then asserts that “No surgeries done? Correct. That actually came out as a lie.”

In this video, Speaker 1 confronts Dennis Gilliam about his alleged involvement in certain Signal and Telegram groups. Dennis claims to have no knowledge of these groups and suggests that he may have been added without his consent. Speaker 1 believes Dennis is not the creator of these groups and wants to collaborate in identifying the real culprits. They discuss the possibility of Dennis being transferred to these groups through links posted on Facebook. Speaker 1 emphasizes that their main focus is finding the individuals responsible for creating and participating in these groups, rather than accusing Dennis. Additionally, the video discusses how the speaker was led to various groups on Signal through provocative photos on Facebook. They mention that both boys and girls are being posted in these groups, with mainly women being posted in the videos. The age range of individuals in the groups is mostly teens and twenties. The speaker admits to clicking on links and seeing pictures and videos but claims to have quickly exited when uncomfortable. They mention that the groups are primarily in Spanish and that they have seen links with pictures and videos being posted. However, the frequency of inappropriate content being posted in the groups remains uncertain. The video also features a conversation between Speaker 1, Speaker 2, and Speaker 3. Speaker 1 confronts Speaker 2 about his alleged involvement in groups that post explicit content involving minors. Speaker 2 denies any knowledge or intent to view such content, but Speaker 1 presses for more information. Speaker 3, who is also present, shares that he has grandchildren and works in mental health. The conversation becomes tense as Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 2 of clicking on videos featuring young children. Speaker 2 admits to accidentally clicking on such videos multiple times. The conversation continues with Speaker 1 explaining their organization's work and Speaker 2's involvement. The video ends with Speaker 2 deleting evidence from his phone.