reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 presents evidence of alleged corruption by Joe Biden, including questionable finances and overseas payments. The firing of a prosecutor investigating Biden's son is highlighted as suspicious. Speaker 0 questions the motives behind the impeachment inquiry, suggesting it may be politically motivated. Speaker 1 argues that the evidence points to corruption and influence peddling, not political revenge. The lack of media coverage is blamed for public skepticism.

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about a testimony where their son claims they were frequently on speaker phone discussing business with a business associate. Speaker 1 denies ever speaking to the gentleman and dismisses the question as lousy. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1, addressing them as Mr. President.

The speaker is asked about the appropriateness of his son's work in China and Ukraine. He denies any wrongdoing, stating that he carried out his job impeccably and that no one found anything out of line. He also mentions that the person who got in trouble in Ukraine was trying to bribe the government to say something negative about him, which never happened. He denies his son making money from China and dismisses the claim that his son received a large payment from a Ukrainian company. He concludes by stating that there is no basis for any wrongdoing in Ukraine.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

Speaker 0 denies any knowledge or discussion about his business or his family's business with his son or anyone else. Speaker 1 reveals that Stephanie, who was vice president, approved a response to a 2015 story about Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma Energy Company. It is also mentioned that Biden's family received less than $1,000,000 from a Chinese firm.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about accepting a large IPO deal from Visa while serving as Speaker of the House. Speaker 1 defends the decision, stating there was no conflict of interest. Speaker 0 presses for clarification, but Speaker 1 maintains there was no wrongdoing.

Speaker 1 denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings and claims to have never discussed anything related to Ukraine. He also states that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business. Speaker 1 dismisses claims that he was on speaker phone discussing business matters and points out that he was aware of his son's business but never talked about it. Speaker 2 admits to having shell companies that collected money through tax fraud, and compares it to what he sees happening with Biden. Speaker 1 emphasizes that there is no evidence to support any wrongdoing.

The State Department was asked if they had any concerns about the vice president's son joining the board of a Ukrainian gas company. The speaker clarified that the son is a private citizen and not a government official. When asked about the perception of conflict or cronyism, the speaker stated that there are no concerns from the State Department. They do not believe that the involvement of the vice president's son would be perceived negatively by the Russians or Ukrainians.

The speaker was asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including some Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker refused to comment and denied any interaction with their son and brother's foreign business associates, calling it a bunch of lies.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of discrediting themselves by avoiding questions about Biden's son and alleged corruption. Speaker 1 questions the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story, sourced from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. Speaker 0 insists it's a crucial issue to investigate Biden's alleged corruption involving China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 argues the story lacks verification. Speaker 0 counters by pointing out the laptop's existence and the Biden family's response. The conversation escalates as Speaker 0 emphasizes the significance of the scandal and Speaker 1 questions its validity.

Hunter Biden and the Biden family's private citizen status means their work does not reflect administration endorsement. The State Department has no concerns about Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian gas company. Biden has stated he will not work for foreign companies if his father becomes president. The President's son's investments are being unwound, and any further questions should be directed to his representatives. The President's policy remains that his family will not have business relationships with foreign entities. The focus should be on investigating Trump. Hunter Biden's alleged overseas business dealings are not to be discussed from the podium.

Speaker 0 asks how the speaker plans to convince Americans who are upset about Hunter Biden's laptop that he is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop allegations as a smear, stating that every serious investigator has debunked them. He mentions previous similar allegations and points to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community that the Russians are involved. Speaker 1 defends his son's integrity and highlights that during the impeachment, all major Trump officials testified under oath that Biden did his job and broke no laws. He criticizes the president for contributing to the crass and dirty state of politics. Speaker 0 asks one more question.

The speaker asks if the State Department has concerns about the vice president's son joining a Ukrainian gas company's board of directors. The State Department refers the question to the vice president's office. The speaker then asks if the State Department has concerns about potential conflict or cronyism, similar to what they accuse the Russians of. The response is that the vice president's son is a private citizen, not in the same category as Russian or Ukrainian oligarchs. The speaker further asks if there are concerns about how the Russians and Ukrainians would perceive the involvement of the vice president's son, given the situation. The response is that there are no concerns.

Speaker 0 asks Biden about the allegations of illegal or unethical behavior regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Speaker 1 denies the claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 mentions the lawsuits, but Speaker 1 again denies any interaction.

Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian energy company while his father, Joe Biden, was Vice President is questioned. Joe Biden claims he didn't know what his son was doing and only found out after he joined the board. He trusts his son and sees no reason to investigate further. The interviewer suggests that as Vice President, Joe Biden should have been more aware of his family's activities, but Joe Biden dismisses the idea. He deflects by mentioning the issues surrounding Trump's family. Joe Biden believes there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on his son's part.

Speaker 0 asks how to convince Americans who are focused on Hunter Biden's laptop that the speaker is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop issue as a smear, stating that reputable sources have debunked it. They mention that similar allegations were made months ago. Speaker 1 also highlights intelligence community evidence of Russian involvement. They defend their son's integrity.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of selling access to the president through his son's job at a gas company. Speaker 1 denies the claim and challenges Speaker 0 to do physical activities together. Speaker 1 defends his son, stating that no one has accused him of wrongdoing. Speaker 0 mentions hearing the accusation on MSNBC, but Speaker 1 disputes this. Speaker 1 criticizes Speaker 0's lack of backbone. Speaker 2 comments on Speaker 1's defensive and angry response, claiming that it reveals the real Joe Biden. Speaker 2 asserts that Joe Biden sent his son to peddle influence overseas, and when confronted, Joe Biden denies it, claiming that the mainstream media has not reported it.

President Biden denies discussing business matters with his son or family members. He claims to have never spoken to his son about it and avoids any knowledge or involvement in their business dealings. When asked if he stands by his statement of not discussing his son's overseas affairs, he affirms his stance.

Vice President denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings, emphasizing a clear separation between personal and government matters. He stands by his statement and claims to have been unaware of his son's involvement in a particular company. The Vice President asserts that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business, specifically mentioning Ukraine.

Speaker 1 states that the Biden family engaged in influence peddling, resulting in tens of millions of dollars. He claims his legitimate businesses became illegitimate through alignment with Hunter Biden, which involved selling the "Biden name." Speaker 1 alleges that Joe Biden was aware and involved, citing his participation in at least two business phone calls. He asserts that Joe Biden's claim of never discussing foreign business deals with his son or brother is a lie, supported by documents and evidence. Speaker 1 further alleges that Joe Biden negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party on a golf course to secure a board seat and receive money from the Chinese. He references a WhatsApp message and a billion dollars in Ukraine, conditioned on removing a prosecutor investigating Hunter.

The speaker is asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker denies these allegations, stating that they did not interact with their son and brother's foreign business associates. They dismiss the claims as lies.

Joe received $3,500,000 from Russia through Putin, who had a connection with the former mayor of Moscow. Joe's family also received the same amount. Speaker 1 denies receiving any money from foreign sources, including China, and claims that his son is the only one who made money from China. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the money he received, but Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing in Ukraine, stating that investigations found no basis for such claims.