reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We are here to fight against globality. We will not stop until we bring them down. We, along with millions around the world, will not let them dictate what people want. They are the minority, and we will not tire until we defeat them.

The speaker discusses the difficulty of reforming the European Union (EU) due to the need for unanimous agreement among the 27 member countries. They give examples of different countries' conflicting interests, such as France wanting to reduce tax evasion while Luxembourg relies on it. They also mention the challenges of reforming agriculture and rebuilding French industry. The speaker argues that the EU's institutions lack real power and that changing the EU from within is impossible. They suggest that leaving the EU through a Frexit referendum would allow France to regain control and pursue its own policies. They mention the importance of addressing the issue of the euro and express agreement with certain political figures.

The speakers frame a broad concern about control over resources and exposure to external interventions. Speaker 0 emphasizes individual agency in food-related choices: “I put into my mouth. I can control what I feed,” and notes that while people can decide how to grow their food and whether to spray pesticides, they cannot control “the experiments over my head.” They describe a sense of invasion and threat, stating, “Within an hour, it spreads out. It creates a blanket. We're in a war. This is a war against me, you, our children, our grandchildren, and generations to come. This is war raised upon us.” They claim the programs involve “spraying tons of patented aerosol balloons into our skies without public consent,” naming substances such as aluminum and barium, and assert these actions are “targeting your food, your water, and it's coming in multiple different ways.” When asked how to verify these claims, Speaker 1 mentions that “states have bills to ban it,” suggesting a political dimension to the issue. Speaker 0 expands on the political and legal landscape, stating that “I think there are now 32 states that have taken an attempt at this,” and that the issue has “become a huge issue.” They argue that if ordinary citizens knew “the truth of what's going on and what they're being exposed to without their consent,” they would be outraged and would take action. They call for accountability, declaring, “I don't want some creep ramming chemicals down my throat without my permission. We need to prosecute those people that are doing it.” The exchange also touches on strategy and momentum. Speaker 0 asks whether they should “stand in one spot and say enough is enough” and whether, if others don’t listen, they should “take it to the next step.” They reflect that they have been pursuing this issue “for a while,” indicating ongoing effort and persistence. Overall, the dialogue centers on perceived loss of individual control over exposure to environmental interventions, the belief in large-scale, covert aerosol programs, legislative responses at the state level, a call for accountability and prosecution, and the contemplation of continued collective action in response to what is described as an ongoing, war-like threat.

Gardons notre calme et attendons de voir ce qui se passe. Il est crucial d'appliquer nos lois en Europe, surtout lorsque celles-ci risquent d'être contournées. Si nous ne les faisons pas respecter, cela pourrait mener à des interférences. Nous avons déjà agi en Roumanie, et il sera nécessaire de le faire en Allemagne si la situation l'exige. --- Let’s stay calm and wait to see what happens. It is crucial to enforce our laws in Europe, especially when they are at risk of being circumvented. If we do not uphold them, it could lead to interference. We have already acted in Romania, and it will be necessary to do so in Germany if the situation requires it.

The speaker expresses frustration with Manitoba's lack of response to the issue at hand. They mention a conversation with Madame Bardon about tariffs and express concern over the negative impact on businesses, jobs, and territories. The speaker emphasizes the need for action and discusses the European mechanism and its importance in addressing the problem. They highlight the lack of analysis on the inflation issue and propose two options: accepting a severe recession or resolving the energy problem to prevent further inflation. The speaker calls for a decision to break away from the European market and mentions the ability to produce electricity at a lower cost. They urge the government to make a sovereign decision to suspend mechanisms when international threats arise.

We willen laten zien dat boeren bewust kapot worden gemaakt in Europa. Voedselschaarste wordt gecreëerd en er wordt niets opgelost voor hen. De bevolking steunt de boeren voor gezond voedsel. Brussel wordt bekritiseerd als slechts een stad in België. Boeren zullen blijven vechten tegen het beleid dat hen benadeelt, met respect voor de moed om op te komen tegen de bestuurders. Als boeren niet winnen, kan dit leiden tot een burgeroorlog in Europa. Translation: We want to show that farmers are being deliberately destroyed in Europe. Food scarcity is being created and nothing is being solved for them. The population supports farmers for healthy food. Brussels is criticized as just a city in Belgium. Farmers will continue to fight against the policy that harms them, with respect for the courage to stand up against the rulers. If farmers do not win, this could lead to a civil war in Europe.

I received a list of crops that can be grown next year, and it turns out we can only grow Chinese cabbage. Everything else needs to be harvested by October 1st. It's ridiculous! We'll have to buy celery from Spain, even though it can't be grown there because it's too warm. Who came up with this list? We're not even talking about sustainability anymore. I've been trying to get in touch with the government about these issues, but they're not responding. The problems will be huge next year, and there won't be enough food. I've reached out to people in The Hague, but no one is listening.

We are here to tell you that you picked this fight and now you've got it. We, along with millions of brave citizens, will fight you every step of the way. You, the small French minority, do not have the right to dictate what people want. Take it from us, the seven citizens gathered here today, and the millions around the world. We will bring you down and won't stop until we succeed.

- The speaker declares that free speech is "officially dead in Brussels," citing that the supreme court has ignored grievances and approved a prison sentence for racist memes in a private group chat. - They frame this as bad news, but say eight years of show trials, house raids, and other actions by the Brussels Regime have mentally prepared them to endure the injustice and to fight back, stating they will not back down. - The speaker notes there are "12 more criminal investigations and court cases for hate speech" currently running against them, and asserts these will not stop them from fighting the Brussels regime and a "great replacement." They call for supporters to share the video to demonstrate that resistance is alive and kicking. - They mention the Palace Of Justice, where the Supreme Court resides, and claim it was designed by a "very corrupt Freemason" who made it "way too big" to be bigger than Saint Peter's Basilica in Rome to show a supposed Freemason victory over the church. - The speaker asserts that the Freemasons Palace of Justice, or "injustice", is literally collapsing from the inside out and impossible to repair, noting that scaffolding had to be installed to support previous scaffolding. - They conclude by stating that, just as the palace behind them is collapsing, the Brussels Regime will soon collapse, regardless of how many people they throw in jail for opinions.

We are not in trouble because of a lack of energy or amateurs. We need to talk about things. These people are great, but they are inexperienced. Macron has been here for 6 years and didn't think about all this before. We are dependent now, whereas France used to be a leader in electricity. We had the strongest nuclear potential in the world and could export electricity. But now we are begging because we followed Germany's lead. This is not Europe, it's German Europe. The Franco-German relationship is a disaster for France. We need to break free from this imperialism.

Speaker 0: Is it legal to flag in Norway now? Not allowed to wave the flag, but can you go with foreign flags in Norway? I’m just going out here. I’ll not do anything. As I say, we have never done anything. So we can just go over here to get a better angle. Are you allowed to walk with foreign flags and flags in Oslo today?

We don't want to be like the European Union, we don't care about them. We are French and we stick to French laws.

We also recognize potential challenges in the relationship with The United States, and we are ready for that. When targeted, unfairly or arbitrarily, the European Union will respond firmly. This weekend, we witnessed how steep tariffs were imposed on Canada and Mexico. Those tariffs raise business costs. They harm workers and consumers. They create unnecessary economic disruption and drive inflation. We do not see much good coming out of this. At the same time, the European Union remains also steadfast in its multilateral commitments, be it from our development aid to our climate targets.

Speaker 0 warned that if any ally tries to help the ICC, they will be sanctioned. They said, "we're gonna sanction you," and that "we should crush your economy because we're next." They referenced Justin in Canada and his position, asking, "What should the penalty be?"

The speaker states that countries represented by the European Union will be told "that game is up." If they "get cute," they won't be able to sell cars into the United States anymore. The speaker claims that European unions and other countries gave drug companies a price, expecting America to pay the difference to cover a shortfall. The speaker says "that's what we did, but we're not doing it anymore."

The speaker states that countries represented by the European Union will be told "that game is up." If they "get cute," they won't be able to sell cars into the United States anymore. The speaker claims that European Union countries gave drug companies a price, expecting America to pay the difference to cover a shortfall. The speaker says "that's what we did, but we're not doing it anymore."

In this segment, the speaker argues against the idea that exiting the eurozone or the European Union would automatically sever access to the internal market, labeling such fears as fundamentally incorrect. The speaker references a position previously outlined in a Welt article from 2016, stating that every country within the EU should be allowed to leave the EU and automatically fall into the internal market, so that the free internal market continues to guarantee the fundamental freedoms between EU countries. The overarching objective presented is the creation of a European Economic Area, but the speaker rejects what is described as a “monstrous overbuild” currently practiced, characterized by tens of thousands of civil servants who are deemed unnecessary and overpaid, with a level of intrusion that is viewed as excessive. The speaker then shifts to a critique of the current leadership and policies, urging the removal of those in power within the EU framework, specifically naming Ursula von der Leyen and the policies associated with her tenure. The cited policy areas include a ban on combustion engines, CO2-related levies, heating laws, and building energy policy, among others. The demand is to “throw out” these people, as they are viewed as representative of an overreaching EU apparatus that the speaker does not support. The central message is that such a centralized and intrusive EU structure is unnecessary and undesirable. The text emphasizes the need for a free internal market among European nations, paired with the restoration of national sovereignty and secure borders. The speaker advocates for free exchange of goods and services among nations, suggesting that this approach would constitute real progress. The concluding sentiment reinforces a preference for smaller, less intrusive governance and a streamlined framework that prioritizes the free movement of goods and services within a European context, while maintaining secure borders and national autonomy. The overall call is for scrapping what is described as the EU apparatus, empowering nations to engage in open trade and cooperation without the perceived rigidity and overreach of the current EU system.

In this video, the speaker discusses a manifesto that will be adopted in December. The manifesto aims to restore national borders, exit the Schengen area, eliminate the European Commission and the European Court of Justice, and prioritize French law over European law. The speaker also mentions the need to establish a national electricity price outside of the European market and eliminate France's annual net contribution to the EU. They emphasize the importance of French digital sovereignty and the need to renegotiate harmful free trade agreements. The speaker criticizes the European diplomatic service and mentions the abandonment of French consulates. They conclude by expressing the desire for cooperation between willing countries on future projects. The speaker hopes that this manifesto will bring together resistant lists and unite the French people.

The speakers express concern about the impact of importation on Italian agriculture and the future of their children and grandchildren. They feel that they are being forced to compromise their dignity and struggle financially, unable to afford tractor payments. Speaker 1 emphasizes the need to defend the dignity of farmers and the entire agricultural industry in Italy, as they are not allowed to cultivate certain crops and are being encouraged to use synthetic alternatives like meat and milk.

In sunny Switzerland, the speaker reports on recent meetings with European and international leaders. They claim that people in Switzerland are aware of the dangers of the widely distributed injections, which they believe have harmed millions of individuals. The speaker states that people regret receiving the toxic concoction and no longer trust the media. They emphasize that those who have been campaigning against the injections have been vindicated. The speaker urges detoxification and wishes everyone well.

The atmosphere in the European Parliament is tense. Many colleagues are realizing they are not serving the people's best interests. It's no longer about the people, but about a global elite. They are starting to see that the public is no longer fooled by climate change rhetoric and are standing up against it.

A Dutch farmer named Mark Roth is currently in jail for blocking a highway in 02/2020. He was convicted for endangering people by stopping traffic, though no one was hurt. The speaker believes this is a political trial and an example of lawfare against farmers. Roth is in jail because he didn't comply with the community service he was sentenced to. The speaker shares a post address to write Mark letters of support while he's in jail. According to the speaker, things are not improving for Dutch farmers, despite a new right-wing government. Farmers feel the "green madness" is still ruling the country. Meat prices are skyrocketing, and the Green Deal in Europe remains in place. The speaker believes that unless the EU is abolished and bureaucrats like Ursula von der Leyen are removed, nothing will change. The speaker will provide updates and plans to share Mark's perspective once he is released.

Speaker describes ongoing experiences challenging corona mandates in Switzerland: leading court proceedings as a Swiss lawyer against unconstitutional mandates, representing individuals seeking compensation for injuries from mRNA injections, and initiating a major criminal court proceeding against Swissmedic, the Swiss medical safety agency. Despite over three years of hard work, results regarding justice remain unseen. From these efforts, the speaker identifies a lesson: in Europe, in all involved courts and health authorities, they protect their governments with deceptive information policies, wrong decision making, and, most of all, with totally illegal authorizations of mRNA products granted in Switzerland by safety agencies. The speaker notes that no justice has been done and no lesson learned in the official European world. The speaker then asks what can be done about this and first seeks input from the MAHA team and Doctor Robert Malone about any hope from the United States, where positive signals have emerged, notably on January 20 with the present president Trump’s declaration to exit the WHO and other steps. From today’s event, the speaker derives hope, but contends that the hope must come from Europe. A plan is articulated: Europe will take its destiny into its own hands. The speaker intends to ensure that people can see the true effects of the WHO and the true effects of the industry after many proceedings have resulted in authorities claiming that the WHO was setting Gold standards. The speaker aims to contribute, together with the MEHA movement, all of their experience and investigations conducted against the WHO, and to work together to make Europe healthy again. The commitment is clear: they will never give up.

The atmosphere in the European Parliament is tense. Colleagues are realizing they are not serving the people's best interests. They feel the government is controlled by global elitists, not the people. People are no longer fooled by climate change narratives, and the truth is starting to come to light.

The speaker criticizes the European Commission, calling them "Talibans of the law" and "dogmatic extremists" on competition policy. They argue that France should prioritize its national interest and keep its dams, dismissing any interference from the Commission. When asked about the queen, the speaker suggests removing her, questioning the Commission's authority and dismissing any potential consequences. They emphasize the need to protect France's national interest and oppose any infringements. The speaker concludes by urging moderation and calm in the face of excesses.