TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This video discusses the history of coronavirus research, highlighting its origins in 1965 and the development of spike protein vaccines by Pfizer in 1990. The speaker emphasizes the long-standing manipulation of pathogens for various purposes and questions the ethical implications of these actions. The conversation urges listeners to consider the implications of such research on humanity's future.

Speaker asserts that "the state, however you define that, the military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Barack at the University of North Carolina created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China, and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic." They ask, "When are we gonna have accountability for that?" They seek accountability for "the COVID era," and for "the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism, and they've covered it up for twenty six years." They ask, "How do we begin to have accountability?" and conclude, "You want to call it something different? Truth Commissions, criminal trials? You're I would love to comparing"

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

The speaker reflects on their previous warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They acknowledge their wife's role in encouraging them to share their information. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its manipulation and patenting since 1965. They discuss the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and the ineffectiveness of vaccines. They emphasize the intentional release of a respiratory pathogen and the push for a universal vaccine template. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker presents evidence suggesting that the events of the past four years were orchestrated to infringe on people's liberties. They claim that the manipulation of coronaviruses began in 1966 and that various organizations colluded to establish a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for a disease that was declared eradicated. They argue that this is an act of domestic and international terrorism. The speaker also highlights patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. They assert that there was a planned release of a respiratory pathogen in 2019.

The speaker presents evidence suggesting that the events of the past four years were orchestrated to infringe on people's liberties. They claim that the manipulation of coronaviruses began in 1966 and that various organizations colluded to establish a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for a disease that was declared eradicated. They also discuss the potential weaponization of coronaviruses and the release of a respiratory pathogen in 2019. The speaker implies that these actions constitute acts of terrorism.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and an agreement between the US and UK in 1967 to modify and manipulate the virus. They argue that this orchestrated assault on liberties has been happening for 56 years. They also mention a mandate established in 2011 for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker accuses various foundations and organizations of colluding to create a public health emergency for profit. They discuss patents filed in 2002 for a weaponized coronavirus and the use of the term "biological warfare enabling technology." The speaker claims that the World Health Organization predicted a release of respiratory medicine in 2019. They conclude by accusing MI5 of being involved in the distribution of the virus and discussing previous instances of crises being used to justify vaccine immunity and corporate immunity.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and other organizations of criminal collusion and involvement in the distribution of the COVID campaign. They conclude by stating that this is a marketing ploy to deprive people of liberty.

In this video, the speaker discusses their involvement in analyzing patents related to intangible assets for banking. They discovered anomalies that suggested potential violations of biological and chemical weapons laws, including a patent filed by Ralph Barrick on an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus in 2002. The speaker questions why a virus would be engineered to target different tissues and highlights that SARS CoV-1 and SARS CoV-2 are not naturally occurring phenomena but rather engineered technologies. They express concern about Moderna's patent filings mentioning the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen before the COVID-19 pandemic. The speaker argues that the Wuhan virus narrative falls apart when considering the lack of evidence for a collected pathogen and questions why Ralph Barrick was asked to confirm the origin of the virus. They suggest that the virus was a weapon rather than a naturally transmissible virus due to its replication defectiveness. The speaker emphasizes the significance of the term "release" in the context of a lethal respiratory pathogen.

The speaker claims the DOD distributed COVID-19 vaccines and required absolute immunity, making the DOD the target for lawsuits, which would be difficult to win without the data they are hiding. They believe EcoHealth Alliance created SARS CoV-2 in the Wuhan lab with the DOD or CIA's approval, transferring the necessary technology to the CCP. A study showed a 12 nucleotide sequence in a Moderna patent from 2016 perfectly matched SARS CoV-2, suggesting the disease was developed in the mid-2010s. The speaker presents military medical records showing a soldier receiving COVID-19 immunizations by Moderna in 2014, suggesting the need to investigate the real history of COVID. They also claim to have Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a Komunardi approval agreeing to a study based on oncolytic gene products for gene therapy shedding.

In this video, the speaker discusses evidence suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a natural occurrence but rather a deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen. They highlight a publication by the World Health Organization from September 2019 that mentions a world exposure to a respiratory pathogen. The speaker also mentions a report by Moderna, a pharmaceutical company, which reveals a payment of $400 million to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) for a royalty-bearing license agreement. They argue that this payment indicates a corrupt relationship between NIAID, led by Anthony Fauci, and the perpetrators of the outbreak. The speaker criticizes the lack of action from Congress and governors in addressing these issues. They also discuss a study conducted at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which involved the engineering of a synthetic clone of the virus. The speaker accuses NIAID and other institutions of being part of a criminal conspiracy and calls for the public to share this information widely.

The speaker discusses the concept of a replication-defective virus and its significance. They question the intentional release of a lethal respiratory pathogen and highlight the change in the definition of a vaccine. The speaker also mentions the manipulation of adverse event definitions and the legal implications of misleading the public. They provide evidence of collusion and premeditation in the development of the COVID-19 vaccines. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of action from authorities despite clear evidence of crimes being committed. They conclude by mentioning the financial interests of organizations involved in the vaccine development process.

In this video, the speaker discusses the connection between pandemic simulations, the 9/11 attacks, the passing of the Patriot Act, and the increase in bioweapons development. They claim that the CIA and neoconservatives used the anthrax attack on the U.S. Capitol to justify going to war with Saddam Hussein and passing the Patriot Act. They also mention that Tony Fauci became the bioweapon czar in 2001 and received a significant budget increase. The speaker alleges that Fauci and others funded gain-of-function studies in Wuhan, China, and Ukraine. They criticize the lack of a thorough investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and an agreement between the US and UK in 1967 to modify and manipulate the virus. They argue that this was part of a larger plan to establish a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker accuses various organizations of colluding to profit from the pandemic and suggests that the virus was intentionally released. They also mention previous instances of crises being used to justify vaccine immunity and corporate protection. The speaker concludes by stating their commitment to fighting for liberty.

The speaker discusses the development of a COVID-19 vaccine in collaboration with Moderna. While some companies see it as a moneymaker, the CEO of Moderna suggests that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The speaker also mentions funding for gain-of-function research and the possibility of a deliberate bioterror attack. There is a dispute over whether gain-of-function research was funded, with accusations of lying to Congress. The speaker addresses conspiracy theories and emphasizes the positive impact of vaccines. They also highlight the need to be prepared for future pandemics, whether natural or intentional.

In this video, the speaker discusses the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and raises concerns about a potential intentional or accidental release of a respiratory pathogen. They mention that Moderna's patent applications were modified to include this justification for creating a vaccine before the virus even existed. The speaker suggests that there was a premeditated plan to use the coronavirus to push for a universal vaccine template. They also highlight a statement from a 2015 National Academy of Sciences proceeding, where it was claimed that this act was an act of domestic terrorism and a financial fraud. The speaker emphasizes the importance of investigating the premeditation behind these events.

The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.

In 1965, coronavirus was identified as a pathogen that could be modified for various purposes. In 1966, the first transatlantic biological experiment using a coronavirus model was conducted. In 1967, human trials were conducted on modified coronavirus. In 1990, Pfizer filed the first patent for a spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. It was found that coronavirus mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. In 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. The CDC filed a patent on SARS coronavirus isolated from humans in 2003. The RT PCR test for coronavirus was identified as a bioterrorism threat in 2002. Gain of function research on coronavirus was exempted from a moratorium in 2014. In 2016, a journal article stated that SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence. In 2019, Moderna modified patent applications to include the term "accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen." The goal was to create a universal vaccine template. The intent was to use coronavirus to achieve this. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker discusses the unethical actions of the CDC in patenting the SARS coronavirus, the bioterrorism threat of the RT PCR test, and the gain of function research on coronaviruses. They highlight the financial motives behind the push for a universal vaccine template and call for an end to gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker emphasizes the need for moral oversight and independent review boards in scientific research.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They argue that the United States and the UK, along with researchers worldwide, planned to use the virus to impose tyrannical reforms on society. They emphasize that there are many people who did not comply with these measures. Another speaker praises the evidence presented by the first speaker, stating that it is all based on published documents and facts. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They state that the United States, the UK, and researchers planned to use the virus to enforce tyrannical reforms on society. The speaker emphasizes that their statements are supported by documented evidence, which they have provided in a speech to the EU parliament. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The speaker discusses a theory about the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. They mention a researcher named Ralph Barrick and his chimeric coronavirus research. They also talk about the US Center for Disease Control filing a patent on the coronavirus and its detection. The speaker suggests that the CDC had control over who could study the virus and profit from it. They imply that there may have been illegal actions involved in the manipulation of the coronavirus for monetary gain.

The speaker discusses a theory about the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. They mention a researcher named Ralph Barrick and his chimeric coronavirus research. They also talk about the US Center for Disease Control filing a patent on the coronavirus and its detection. The speaker suggests that the CDC had control over who could study the virus and profit from it. They imply that there may have been illegal actions involved in the manipulation and patenting of the coronavirus.

In this video, the speaker discusses their investigation into the origins of COVID-19. They claim that the virus was created in a lab in Wuhan, China, and that Dr. Anthony Fauci funded it. They also suggest that the US intelligence community was aware of this. The speaker calls for investigations into the involvement of various organizations and individuals, including Ralph Barrick and UC Davis. They criticize Fauci for allegedly coordinating a cover-up and lying about gain-of-function research. The speaker believes that Fauci should be held accountable for the millions of deaths caused by the pandemic. The video also includes statements from Fauci about the importance of preparing for epidemics and the potential of mRNA vaccines.