reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In September 1991, shortly after the end of the Cold War, a cabal of elite bankers and intelligence operatives led by George H. W. Bush allegedly financed a $240,000,000,000 covert operations war chest through the purchase of ten-year securities due on 09/12/2001. Project HAMR is described as being used to finance a covert economic operation against the collapsing Soviet Union, whereby unknown Western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry with a focus on oil and gas, crashing the Russian economy, looting its central bank, and orchestrating what is called the great ruble scam, along with other clandestine state-supported operations intended to prevent Russia from contesting the US as a world superpower, while enriching the economic hitmen who supposedly devoured the collapsing Russian economy after the Soviet Union’s fall. Evidence is said to show that several federal and private investigations had already begun uncovering the HAMR fund before the nine-eleven attacks, including the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), which reportedly had been investigating crimes connected with the plundering of Russia. It is claimed that 39 of 40 ONI office personnel were killed on nine-eleven, including the entire chain of command. The Pentagon’s financial accounting offices in the wing targeted were also an obvious target, as were passengers on Flight 77 who allegedly held top secret clearances and were connected with Pentagon Black operations. Agents of the ONI were said to have been investigating financial transactions linked to securities managed by those securities dealers in the World Trade Center, which were also targeted. It is claimed that 31 percent of the fatalities in the Pentagon were from the Naval Command Center housing the ONI, and 41 percent of fatalities in the Twin Towers came from Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers, two major security brokers in the World Trade Center. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest US security dealer; Flight 11 struck Martian McLennan’s secure computer room in the North Tower, just below Cantor Fitzgerald’s location. A massive explosion reportedly occurred just under the FBI offices in the North Tower on the 23rd Floor, with fires on the 22nd Floor and explosions at Garbin Inter Capital on the 25th Floor and in the basement of Tower 1. Flight 175 hit the South Tower at 09:03, directly below Eurobrokers’ floors. Building 6 was destroyed by an explosion before either tower fell, and this building housed the Eldorado Task Force, an interagency money laundering watchdog group. The narrative argues that a national emergency by the Federal Reserve and the SEC’s declaration of a national emergency on September 14 eased regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for fifteen days, enabling the $240,000,000,000 in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without standard ownership identification. The destruction of the towers and Building 6 is said to have created confusion to conceal illicit activities that morning. Richard Andrew Grove, a nine-eleven whistleblower, is described as a software salesman for Silverstream, which provided connectivity for Marsh and AIG, linking them through specialized accounting software. Grove allegedly found overbilling of Marsh by Silverstream by $7,000,000 for fictitious hardware and an exploitable flaw in the software. Grove’s testimony and recovered hard drives indicated suspicious money transfers during the attacks, allegedly performed electronically via Silverstream software, with hush money payments related to the Marsh overbilling to facilitate clearing the HAMR securities. Marsh’s CEO at the time was Jeffrey Greenberg, son of Maurice Greenberg of AIG. Greenberg had risen to CEO of Marsh after moving from AIG in 1995 and resigned after financial crimes accusations; Marsh was located directly adjacent to Cantor Fitzgerald in the North Tower, with Marsh’s executives and whistleblowers including Gary Lasco, Kathryn Lee, Ken Rice, Richard Brewhart, and John Oltzhoffer among those who died on 9/11 in the meeting room where evidence would have been presented. AIG is portrayed as more than an insurance company, with long ties to intelligence communities. AIG ran Kroll Associates, the World Trade Center’s security contractor, and Morris Greenberg (Maurice Greenberg’s son) is described as connected to intelligence circles, having been nominated for Director of Central Intelligence after authoring a CFR report advocating that FBI and DEA agents abroad should not act independently of ambassadors or the CIA. The narrative links this to continued covert activities, including drug money laundering, and mentions connections to Iran-Contra and narco-trafficking, asserting a motive for Afghanistan’s invasion due to drug profits. Dine Corp and Stewart Air Force Base are cited in relation to the 9/11 events, with claims about the aviation routes and hidden agendas. The discussion covers several figures and institutions: Richard Armitage as deputy secretary of state who allegedly granted visas to 15 of the 19 hijackers; Frank Carlucci as Carlyle Group chairman and DC on 9/11; the association of Stratosec with Bush relatives; Kroll Associates and John O’Neill’s role as head of World Trade Center security; and the assertion that Able Danger whistleblower Anthony Shaefe claims the government destroyed data identifying ringleaders Mohammed Atta as early as February 2000. It is argued that the White House’s handling of warnings, the 9/11 Commission’s composition and conclusions, and media control by a small number of corporations contributed to suppressing the perceived truth. Further, the text notes the involvement of Paul Bremer, l Paul Bremer, and connections to Marsh, AIG, and other elites, and it discusses the Pentagon’s missing funds, Dov Zakheim’s roles in defense contracting, and the presence of nanothermite residues as part of the World Trade Center demolition discussion. The narrative closes with a claim that the individuals and organizations cited are as suspicious as the hijackers, challenging mainstream accounts and suggesting that the evidence of a broader conspiracy has been suppressed.

An individual from the Pittsburgh office, who may have failed training exams and was not a top agent, was inexplicably placed in charge of the president's entire trip from arrival to departure. Sources close to the Secret Service's internal investigation claim the Department of Homeland Security is pressuring the Secret Service to withhold documents requested by Congress. The speaker insists the American people deserve the truth.

The speaker discusses various controversies surrounding the 9/11 attacks. They mention how the 9/11 Commission answered questions from the public but failed to address those from the victims' families. They also highlight the destruction of important data by organizations like the DIA and SEC, and the secrecy surrounding investigations by the NIST and FBI. The speaker questions the credibility of a supposed informant and criticizes the media for presenting a one-sided narrative. They warn that anyone doubting the official story will be labeled a conspiracy theorist. The transcript ends abruptly, leaving some points unresolved.

The discussion argues that identifying government corruption requires identifying the actors, and frames RussiaGate as a politically funded operation used in intelligence and law enforcement to obtain a secret-court authorization by lying about a political opponent to surveil him, taking two years to unpack. The central claim is that Gina Haspel was a leading architect of RussiaGate and remained behind the scenes, later becoming Trump’s CIA director. The transcript asserts that in 2016, when RussiaGate was launched in England, Gina Haspel was the CIA station chief for England and the top intelligence officer in the United Kingdom. It claims that, for lawful overseas intelligence and law enforcement operations, the number-one office of the DNI representation must authorize offensive operations, and that Gina Haspel, as the authorized representative in England, had to authorize such activities. The transcript states that new reporting indicates US FBI and intelligence community officials, and possibly other overseas intelligence allies, were involved in “bumpings” in England, and that this could not have happened without Haspel’s authorization. It further claims the key questions were why she did it, what legality she understood, what extent of knowledge she had, and what internal memorandums she would have written to authorize the conduct, including who she worked with, such as Comey, McCabe, Stroock, Page, and others, across England and America. A second key point is that, according to the transcript, Haspel blocked release of an ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment) report. It refers to a report by Devin Nunes and the team on John Brennan’s ICA that the transcript says was critical and should have been released during the Trump administration through the end. It claims Haspel stonewalled it and that it remains in a safe at CIA headquarters, portraying this as the reason the report is still classified and not publicly available. The transcript explains that in 2016 and 2017, John Brennan was ordered by Obama to issue the ICA on what Russia did, if anything, to interfere in US elections, and that the produced report was largely false. It states that, in parallel, Nunes and others created a classified seventeen-page report assessing what went into the ICA, who conducted interviews, what intelligence was used, whether it was false, and whether there was political motivation. The transcript says this report was not released, and calls Haspel the single most important figure blocking it. It also claims this helps demonstrate that the IC was involved and that there was “tons more corruption.” The transcript adds that the president reportedly wanted declassification, but says Haspel worked with DOJ figures including Pat Cipollone and others to argue “national security” concerns. It states the declassification fight was lost due to time constraints and links Joe Biden’s win to burying the materials. It concludes by saying that if President Trump wins, the transcript expects this and other material to be declassified, and it cites Washington Post journalist David Ignatius writing an article congratulating Haspel for blocking release, implying that the article reflected knowledge of the report’s contents and political impact.

An individual states they didn't get rich in Congress and questions how people like Biden and Obama acquired wealth while in public service. They claim many informed individuals, including former high-ranking officials from the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, and advisors to Obama, privately believe "the 9/11 report was just silly" and a cover-up. While these individuals are aware of the truth, they are unwilling to come forward publicly. The speaker asserts their credibility on the topic, noting their long-standing involvement and endorsements from figures like Donald Rumsfeld. They reiterate that those with access to real intelligence believe there is more to the events of 9/11 than what has been disclosed.

The discussion says that over a billion people have visited a site, described as a record. The war department is said to have stated that more files will be released soon. UFO experts and top researchers are described as investigating aliens for years, with sources claiming dozens of crashed UFOs have been recovered and that what was found inside is “shocking.” In response to whether there is one type or many types of nonhuman intelligence visiting Earth, people involved in recoveries are said to have stated there are at least four types. Another scientist is quoted as naming the four types as grays, Nordics, insectoids, and reptilians, with all said to have two arms and two legs “just like us.” Experts speculate that reptilians are scaly with long tails like a lizard, insectoids look like a praying mantis, grays resemble classic movie aliens, and Nordics resemble regular Swedish people but are seven feet tall. The evidence is described as not having been seen, but Pete Hegseth is said to say more evidence is coming and that there are many believers in Congress. Speaker 3 says they have seen evidence “in a skiff” that leads them to believe there are things humans cannot explain, and that they have observed things of nonhuman origin and creation, stating it as their opinion. The transcript also claims that releasing the files is difficult because they have been “hitting for years,” and that many people want to keep them unreleased. A further claim is made that “deep states” are fighting the president over release, that the president kept his word, and that “not so friendly comrades” and “alphabet agencies” are slow-walking information. The reason given is that it is about power and control in Washington.

The speaker states the American people deserve truth, accountability, and justice. Records released by ODNI, Senator Grassley, and the House Intelligence Committee confirm the same report. According to the speaker, the Obama administration grossly politicized and manipulated intelligence to delegitimize President Trump before his inauguration, ultimately usurping the will of the American people.

We made progress in accessing documents hidden by the executive branch to keep them from the public. Some documents went to the White House and DHS. We obtained redacted testimonies from White House employees, revealing discrepancies with the select committee's narrative. DHS delayed sharing documents, but recently allowed access. The crucial transcribed interview we sought was missing. The destruction of deposition videotapes was a significant breach of trust and house rules.

Speaker 0 states that the intelligence community assessment at the time contained no information about the election's impact and never mentioned collusion. According to Speaker 0, they are accused of a conspiracy by those who misrepresent the facts. Speaker 0 claims President Obama instructed them not to do anything that would affect the election's outcome or release reports naming American citizens. Speaker 0 says they carried out their responsibilities with integrity. Speaker 1 claims the report contains extensive information relating to collusion and obstruction. Speaker 1 believes anyone can identify interactions and meetings between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and Russians, and that it was enlightening.

The speaker is part of a senate bipartisan investigation into an assassination attempt. According to the speaker, the Secret Service and FBI are dragging their feet and not providing requested documents, such as 302s and interview transcriptions. Documents that are provided are heavily redacted and delivered the day of the interview, making them unusable. The speaker believes this behavior is suspicious and fuels conspiracy theories. They claim releasing the body for cremation before autopsy or toxicology reports further drives suspicion and conspiracy theories.

The first participant asks the second to identify who did each major event. For MLK Jr., the second participant says, “That was a CI operation because they considered him a dangerous communist. And but the FBI was bugging the, in churches where he was giving some of his speeches in churches. They were bugging the podiums and following him around. He was a top target, for elimination.” For JFK, the second participant states, “I think that was a CI hit. They they may have employed some mafia connections to carry it out because that was their mafia assassination program.” Concerning LBJ, the first participant notes, “LBJ was very involved in all that in Dallas. So,” and the second participant adds, “he an evil man.” The first participant affirms, “He was an evil man.” Turning to Pearl Harbor, the second participant claims, “They knew the attack was coming was coming. They knew where it was gonna happen in Pearl Harbor and when. And they they told no one, and they let it happen on purpose. That that's from the commander of the Pacific Fleet. I would say that's a pretty pretty credible witness.” He continues, “So, yeah, that that was a false admitted that. They admitted they had the and they heard it was gonna happen. And, you how know, else were you gonna get Americans to be on the side of this war that had nothing to do with us?” This leads to the discussion of 9/11. The second participant says, “My opinion. As a criminal investigator, as a former CI officer, nine eleven was not the act of a bunch of poorly flight trained terrorists that executed an unbelievably meticulous, piloting of those aircraft, even even pilots. There's there's pilots for nine eleven truth now, and they say, we could not have done that. Not possible.” He adds, “And then we go to the passport issue, and we go to the Tower 7, which was a controlled demolition.” The second participant further asserts, “You talk to any structural engineer, and and and I I have. And the fact I think George w Bush blacked out. I think it was 40 pages of the 09/11 report dealing with Saudi Arabia. So what wait a minute. This report was supposed to be for the American people on what happened, and you blacked all these pages out? What in the world?” He continues, “I do not think that it was a bunch of un poorly trained or untrained terrorists that did it. I think there was another source behind it. I think it was intentional, and I'm going just from a a criminal invest investigative perspective just looking at the evidence, what evidence we have, that that was an intentional act, And it would fall right into the MO that you and I are talking about.” He concludes that the event was “Horrible” and emphasizes that “the shadow government deep state or especially the CIA. It does not matter. Their pawns on their chessboard, they don't care that three thousand people were horribly killed that day, but it achieved the aim of gutting the US constitution, bringing in the horrific Patriot Act Mhmm. Giving the CIA unthinkable authority for secret prison prisons and torture beyond waterboarding and and secret renditions and all of that, the FBI, the ability to to, spy on Americans came out of the Patriot Act. So it was the perfect national security state, energizer that the Patriot Act was, and 70 of the congressmen and senators that read the Patriot Act didn't even read it. They just signed off on it without even reading the bill.”

"President Bush personally has nixed the effort of the nineeleven commission to get all the documents in the White House, especially the presidential daily briefs, which basically tell the commission and the American people what the President knew and when he knew it in regard to the potential attack on nineeleven and the attack itself in the follow-up." "He has personally nixed that information coming to nineeleven." "The truth of matter is the White House has played cover up and has slow walked this this game from the beginning." "It's a scam. It's absolutely disgusting." "We're an independent commission for an independent operational look at why nine eleven happened, what happened there, when the what the president and the government knew, and when they knew it." "We think the commission in many ways was set up to fail because we had, not enough money. We didn't have enough time."

Speaker 0: I was impressed by the questions, and I think it helped him understand how I think and how we run the White House and how we deal with threats. Speaker 1: Mister president, critics suggested you wanted to appear jointly with the vice president so you could keep your story straight. Could you tell us what you think of the value of appearing together and how you would answer those critics? Speaker 2: First of all, look, if we had something to hide, we wouldn't have met with them in the first place. We answered all their questions. I came away good about the session. Speaker 3: And even the president and vice president agreed to meet with the commission, but with a catch. They insisted on meeting together behind closed doors and not under oath. Speaker 2: Mister president, why are you and the vice president insisting on appearing together before the nine eleven commission? Speaker 0: Because the nine eleven commission wants to ask us questions. That's why we're meeting, and I look forward to meeting with them and answering their questions

The January 6th committee, now under Republican control, is unable to review the documents used by the previous committee. The video depositions, which would have been valuable evidence, have been discarded. The staff faced difficulties in gathering necessary information as nothing was indexed or digitized. Surprisingly, there is very little available from the blue team, responsible for investigating security failures at the Capitol. This highlights a lack of government transparency.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about President Joe Biden’s health, cognitive fitness, and who was calling the shots within the White House during his presidency. Key points and claims raised include: - The campaign and public discourse about the president’s fitness or age were prominent, with questions such as “Was the number one issue in the campaign the president's fitness or his age?” and assertions about visibility, including whether “you ever see president Biden in a wheelchair?” While some speakers note aging and physical signs—“I noticed that, you know, he shuffled more,” and “he has more stumbling over words and gasps than he did” — others maintain confidence in his capabilities, claiming he was “on top of things” and that “his mental acuity is great. It's fine. It's as good as it's been over the years.” - There are allegations of a cover-up by insiders. The narrative asserts “new information now on the people in his inner circle and how the cover up actually operated,” with “Senior aids that worked here until just a couple months ago, the beginning of this year, manipulating an ailing president for their own gain.” A figure asks, “How much were you paid for your role in the campaign in 2024?” with the response “Just a little bit short of $4,000,000.” The implication is that financial incentives influenced actions. - Internal discussions about the president’s decline and how it was handled are described as ongoing. “The official word from Biden world about all these new stories is that nothing has been revealed this week that shows that president Biden was anything but effective president.” There is mention of a senior-level discussion about whether the president should have a cognitive exam. - Testimony from Annie Thomas Seen, former senior adviser to Biden, is presented as significant. She “has now taken the fifth,” and the transcript notes “There is now a pattern of key Biden confidant seeking to shield themselves from criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.” She invokes the Fifth Amendment when asked about being told to lie about the president’s health. - There are explosive claims regarding Hunter Biden’s role. One speaker says, “Hunter was driving the decision making for the family. He was almost like a chief of staff.” There are references to an uptick in activity when Hunter Biden was around, and discussions about pardons for Hunter, with the line “Yes. Were you in favor of Hunter Biden getting a pardon?” indicating support for clemency. - The “auto pen” controversy is described. Speakers discuss whether the president’s name was “hand signed” or “auto pen” used for documents, with questions such as “Did he hand sign all executive orders?” and claims that “the auto bin” or “auto pen” was used and that some believed others may have instructed staff to use it. There is mention that some staff “did not know who was operating the Obalon/auto pen,” and that “an executive order” and “memo” details existed but were not definitively known to those questioned. - Media portrayal and public perception are addressed. Some speakers accuse the legacy media of denial about cognitive decline, while others defend the president’s sharpness, noting that this debate is framed by evolving video and audio coverage, including discussions of “cheap fakes” versus real footage. - Additional context touches on Medicare drug price negotiations as a policy objective, with a line about “the ability of Medicare to negotiate drug prices with big pharma,” and the belief that “if we finally beat Medicare” would be a significant achievement. There are repeated assertions that those who knew and understood cognitive issues took control, implying a broader conspiracy. - Throughout, witnesses emphasize that their statements are contextualized within interviews and testimony, with ongoing questions about who was directing the White House and the true state of the president’s health and decision-making.

The speaker claims that a year before 9/11, they identified every Al Qaeda cell, including the New York cell, but the Able Danger team was stopped from sharing this information with the FBI three times. They assert that former FBI Director Louie Free stated this information could have prevented 9/11. They also allege that after criticizing the agency, the Pentagon's inspector general, John Crane, filed a whistleblower paper claiming he was told to lie to Congress. The speaker calls the 9/11 Commission a "cover-up," led by Philip Zelikow, who was allegedly handpicked by Condoleezza Rice. They claim Zelikow shut down Tony Schaeffer's office and tried to destroy his career after Schaeffer met with him in Afghanistan and had information about 9/11 in advance. The speaker states that the government bought and destroyed all copies of Schaeffer's book, "Dark Heart," because it named Zelikow. They also claim that the intelligence they received as vice chairman of a committee was not solid, and they formed a network of intelligence agency insiders who fed them raw data. They allege that intelligence agencies manipulate the media and play games with Congress. The speaker believes that some individuals within these agencies have become wealthy through their positions. They claim that after speaking out, the FBI raided their daughter's house, leading to their electoral defeat. They felt responsible for 9/11 because they knew it could have been prevented.

Speaker 1 claims a legitimate investigation into 9/11 never occurred and questions how the perpetrators were identified so quickly. Speaker 1 alleges the Bush administration ignored intelligence, suggesting they wanted the attacks to happen, citing Condoleezza Rice's memo from August 6, which stated Bin Laden planned to use steel planes to attack buildings. Speaker 1 states that every war starts with a false flag operation. Speaker 1 references a BBC report that allegedly broadcast the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 before it actually happened, claiming the reporter spoke of the collapse 27 minutes before it occurred.

Walter B. Jones Jr. and Speaker 0 worked to get 28 pages of the 9/11 report released. The pages had been redacted, leaving the space blank, but they were able to go to the SCIF and read those 28 pages. Speaker 0 said the report pages were released under Obama, with still a few redactions. Speaker 0 stated that the reason the pages were kept out of the report was to limit embarrassment and to protect relationships with Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0 said this included the claim that the Saudi Arabian government helped and Saudi Arabian spies helped in the United States to assist hijackers, including officials of the government, and that they were trying to keep that secret so that there could be no lawsuits toward Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0 also said that an executive order was passed that prevented 9/11 victims from suing Saudi Arabia, even though Speaker 0 stated the government was complicit.

The discussion centers on the RCMP examination into whether the prime minister obstructed justice under section 139(2) of the Criminal Code. The RCMP’s strongest theory of obstruction involved the prime minister shuffling Jody Wilson-Raybould out of the position of attorney general so a new attorney general might pursue a different decision regarding SNC-Lavalin. It is stated that the RCMP did not have access to all material evidence related to this strongest theory, because of the parameters of the order in council concerning the waiver of cabinet confidentiality. The RCMP acknowledge that the scope limitations prevented them from fully examining this central aspect of potential criminal conduct. When pressed, it is indicated that the decision to expand the parameters would have to be made within the government, and that the RCMP did request an expansion to obtain additional evidence, but the request was denied. The denial occurred on 08/30/2019 and came from the Prime Minister’s Department (the PCO). The RCMP clarifies that they did receive a letter from the Department of Justice, but cannot confirm if it originated from the PCO; regardless, the refusal by the prime minister’s personal department significantly impeded the RCMP’s ability to pursue a full investigation into potential obstruction of justice. The RCMP describes this as limiting their capability and suggests that, given the scope constraints, they could not reach the heart of the obstruction issue. Speaker 0 asserts that the prime minister’s department obstructed the investigation, and questions whether any other Canadian could single-handedly block RCMP access in such a way. Speaker 2 emphasizes that the RCMP operates within established parameters and regulations, noting that certain information remains inaccessible under those rules, including some international security information. Nevertheless, Speaker 0 states that there is no one with such powers and characterizes the situation as part of a pattern of cover-up. Speaker 2 reiterates that they made efforts to obtain additional information, but the expansion request was refused, leaving the investigation constrained. In closing, Speaker 0 thanks the commissioner and Justice, and the exchange underscores that the RCMP felt hindered by the parameters set by the PCO, which curtailed their ability to conduct a full investigation into the prime minister’s potential obstruction of justice.