reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We would expand our efforts to raise funds and engage with the business community. Our message is that we are reasonable and won't destroy everything or take away their assets. It's a big job.

I have taken legal action against those trying to silence Infowars. We are on the offensive, but I need your support. Please visit fightforalex.com to contribute to our victory fund. Humanity is awakening, and we are winning crucial battles against globalists, but the fight isn't over. If you want to resist the globalist agenda and protect our future, support Infowars and me, Alex Jones. We have evidence against them, but I require funds to continue this fight. The power to make a difference is in your hands. You are the resistance, and I’m counting on you to donate at fightforalex.com.

Burn down the current system of electing officials, as it won't fix anything. Most people can't disobey immoral orders, won't act unless it benefits them, and are jerks. The government won't change because it keeps them in power. Target corporations that support corrupt politicians by boycotting them collectively. Protests and letters to officials are ineffective. Hold corporations accountable for underpaying and mistreating workers. Demand warranties on products to prevent scams. By taking down big corporations, we can make a real impact and force change. If you agree, show support and offer to help.

I'm proposing a competition within this committee to address our massive financial problems. I alone have suggested $300 billion in savings. Everyone needs to contribute, and if you're not willing to help stabilize our country's finances, then please step aside. Stop with the lawsuits; we can no longer afford this path. We will fix this with or without your cooperation. You can resist, but I'd rather you actively participate. Thank you.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake in this game. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and talking to the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been easy or smooth.

We just received more subpoenas from the special counsel, Jack Smith. Every contribution counts, from pennies to quarters. We appreciate your support. Encourage others to donate if they haven't already. Get creative, like selling gas from your car for $8 a gallon. Let's keep the momentum going.

We're concerned about the situation in Maui and want everyone, including billionaires, to help. We've committed to giving $10 million, but haven't actually donated it yet. We're asking for your donations to reach that goal. So, you haven't given the $10 million, you just set a fundraising target. With disasters like this, money is crucial. As a multibillionaire with multiple billions and owning 2,000 acres in Maui, don't you have a moral obligation to help your community? Hello? Oprah? Wait, maybe she's Mitch McConnell.

I am fundraising to support our cause and trying to convey the message that we are reasonable and won't destroy everything or take away people's assets. If someone were to invest $10-20 million a year, we would have a different outcome. This is not a significant amount for those who have billions at stake in this game. I am engaging with the business community to explain our intentions. We have a big job ahead of us.

I see NGOs as a hack, and George Soros was a master at it. He understood how to use a relatively small amount of money to establish a nonprofit, and then lobby politicians to funnel large sums of money into it. For example, a $10 million donation could be leveraged into a billion-dollar NGO. These NGOs, or nongovernmental organizations, often have appealing names, but they can essentially be graft machines. They receive grants with minimal requirements, and the government often assumes they're doing good work, even when they might not be. Many within the government are aware of this dynamic, but the funding continues.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake for those involved. I'm conveying this message in my fundraising efforts. Our goal is to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what happens. However, this task has not been easy so far.

Someone needs to take action swiftly. We should organize a GoFundMe campaign for whoever steps up, ensuring they have access to the best commissary items available, like high-quality noodles and toiletries. Ideally, this fund would also secure the futures of their descendants, guaranteeing access to top universities, even if things go south. But the most important thing is that someone needs to step up and take care of this quickly.

We should expand our support to see a different outcome, even if it requires a significant investment. This amount of money is small compared to what those involved in this game have at stake. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and engaging with the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been smooth so far.

We need to focus on funding as the central thread running through the discussions. The speakers discuss private money as a partial source, but highlight a broader funding landscape that includes black budgets, academic budgets, and private interests. - The dialogue identifies funding or lack thereof as the common denominator, with questions about available money and private investment, including whether angel investors are involved. - Speaker 1 explains the banking and funding landscape: black budgets are well funded; academic budgets are nonexistent because they’re considered acceptable to be so; and there are random billionaires who fund anti-gravity or fringe projects because they want recognition beyond their primary business. They mention several examples of private funders: - The church’s fried chicken billionaire funded the Hathaway Lab. - Robert Bigelow, associated with Bigelow Aerospace, is another billionaire funder. - There are other anonymous or less well-known funders who support such projects. - The core problem identified is consistent: money is the barrier, not technology or talent. The project team has observed government and academic research, noting that funding is the persistent obstacle. - To address this, Speaker 1 describes building an institute that pools money from these hobbyist billionaires into a large, stable pot. The goal is a safe, well-funded sandbox for bright people to pursue research without being affected by government budget cycles, tenure concerns, or a single investor’s changing interest or withdrawal. - This institute would select promising projects to fund, creating a new vehicle for financing this type of research. The idea is to avoid overreliance on a single wealthy patron and to maintain stability. - The conversation touches on the strategic value of private funding in the “black world” versus an open, illuminated world, noting that the illuminated world can be a spawning ground for ideas that may eventually benefit broader programs. There is a suggestion that it’s not in the black world’s interest to keep everything completely closed, given potential cross-pollination of ideas. There is mention of Griffin’s position and his connection to DARPA and UAH, implying overlapping influence or interest. - The speakers reflect on whether NASA is still a research organization, and discuss the risk to innovators who fear disappearing when working in public or private sectors. - Speaker 1 notes that ether in space is claimed by some, and expresses interest in talking to more people who hold similar views. - A concluding thread from Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 reiterates the tension between public and private funding, the need for stable, diverse funding sources, and the ongoing interest in discussions about ether and related space phenomena.

I believe in asking patriotic Americans to contribute to this fight, rather than relying on lobbyists and special interests who have hollowed out this town and burdened future generations. I prefer funding my political operation through hardworking Americans, with donations of $10, $20, or $30 at a time. Those who attend lobbyists' fundraisers should see how that works out for them.

We need to maintain a strong street presence and increase our activism. It's crucial to become more assertive and demonstrate our impact on businesses. Our actions must make it clear that we are a force to be reckoned with, and our needs must be met. Increased engagement and a more forceful approach are vital to achieving our goals.

Leaders gathered at the World Economic Forum in Davos to discuss the "great reset," a plan that threatens to deplete the middle class's resources. During COVID, lockdowns led to a massive transfer of wealth to billionaires, with a narrative promoting the idea that you will own nothing and be happy. I have spent my career fighting against these corporate interests, understanding their tactics to exploit our resources and communities. Despite their significant spending on propaganda to instill a sense of powerlessness, they have underestimated the strength of the people. By donating to my campaign, you show that we will not accept this any longer.

A protester, speaking during a recording, discusses an organization called Make the Road New York and its perceived financial scope as part of a broader critique of immigrant-rights organizations. The protester asserts that Make the Road New York has a budget of $30,000,000 and notes that the topic of the immigrants’ rights organization is of interest to those observing organizational funding and influence. The speaker identifies themselves as being with a union, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). They state that they looked at the tax returns of Make the Road New York and found there were registered 501(c)(3) entities that file Form 990, and that Make the Road New York “received $16,000,000 in grants.” This claim ties the organization to a substantial influx of grant funding, suggesting a significant level of financial support from funders or the government. The conversation shifts toward hypothetical implications of such funding, with the speaker asking, “Can you imagine what Nick Shirley could do with $16,000,000? Can you imagine what James O’Keeffe could do with $16,000,000?” This line of inquiry appears to juxtapose the perceived influence of large sums of money with recognizable figures associated with political and investigative activities, raising questions about the power and use of funds. A broader assertion follows: “The United States government is funding this.” This statement connects the funding to government support, implying that public dollars are being directed toward Make the Road New York or similar organizations. The speaker then contrasts national debt with alleged fraud, stating, “We're 36,000,000,000,000 in debt, or are we 36,000,000,000,000 in fraud?” This rhetorical question presents a dichotomy between debt and fraud on a colossal scale, underscoring the protester’s critical stance regarding government spending and accountability. Overall, the excerpt highlights concerns about the financial backing of Make the Road New York, the role of grant funding for immigrant-rights organizations, and the perceived connection to government funding, framed within a broader critique of national debt and potential misallocation of public resources.

Disinformation is profitable, so we must trace the money. A significant portion of advertising revenue supports harmful content. We need to collaborate with the global advertising industry to redirect ad dollars. This involves creating exclusion and inclusion lists to prioritize funding for accurate and relevant news and information. We must challenge the global advertising industry worldwide to focus its resources on disseminating truthful and beneficial information.

I discovered a way to work the system, like George Soros. He realized you could establish an NGO with relatively little money. You then lobby politicians to allocate significant funds to that organization. For instance, a $10 million donation could be used to establish a nonprofit and turn it into a billion-dollar NGO. These organizations often have appealing names, such as the Institute for Peace, yet they're essentially graft machines. There are hardly any requirements associated with the funds they receive. The government largely assumes they're doing good work, although many officials are aware that this isn't the case; it's simply a massive system of graft.

Let's be clear: Elon Musk, the world's wealthiest man, contributed heavily to Donald Trump's election. Since then, his wealth has skyrocketed, and he's now targeting USAID, a vital program aiding the world's poorest. This is unacceptable. His next targets will likely be programs impacting families directly—Medicaid, Medicare, education, affordable housing, and more. We must fight back. This country is a democracy; our government should work for everyone, not just billionaires. Let's organize and tell Trump that this isn't right. We can stop this. We can protect these essential programs and ensure a government that serves all its citizens. Let's stand together and fight for what's right. Thank you.

I'm concerned about the immense power Elon Musk could wield over Americans and I believe we must resist this. It's imperative to fight back against such concentrated control. We need to investigate potential illegal activities when vast sums of money vanish. If we avoid scrutiny, fail to question, and neglect to expose these issues, we'll remain ignorant of the truth. It's our responsibility to uncover these financial mysteries and make them public.

The speaker discusses a financial lever that could change outcomes if funding were provided at a high level. They note: "we'd have a little money if somebody would spend, I don't know, $1,020,000,000 dollars a year supporting this, we would see quite different picture." They emphasize that "$1,020,000,000 dollars a year" is not a large amount for people who have billions at stake in this game, suggesting that substantial funds are already involved at very high levels. The speaker then states the strategy or consequence of such funding: "everything and take away their assets, things like that." This hints at a broader aim to influence or disrupt opposing financial resources or holdings as part of the effort. They acknowledge that the outcome of deploying such funds would be observable: "So we'll see what comes out of that." The speaker reflects on their role, summarizing, "this broadly describes what I do," indicating that the described activities and approach are representative of their work. They conclude with a candid remark about the nature of the field: "We have in not a small not a smooth job," acknowledging challenges and the complexity of the work involved. Overall, the speaker outlines a situation where substantial funding could shift results, implicates asset-focused strategies, and positions their work as broadly characterized by these dynamics, while recognizing the difficult and non-smooth nature of the efforts.

Disinformation is profitable, so we must trace the money. A significant portion of the funding for harmful content comes from the global advertising industry. We need to collaborate with this industry to redirect ad dollars. This can involve creating exclusion and inclusion lists to target funding towards accurate and reliable news and information. We must challenge the global advertising industry worldwide to prioritize funding for truthful and relevant content.

You need to invest in this movement. Everyone has a story to tell, and I receive countless ideas daily. My next step is to clone myself by teaching others how to expose corruption and create impactful content. The truth is at stake, and exposing it requires courage and community. Power hates sunlight, and together, we can stand up against it. This Wednesday at 7 PM, I will teach the fundamentals of storytelling at o'Keefewebinar.com. Join us as we build a movement that expands into every state and community. We the People are coming together to hold the corrupt accountable.

I believe in asking patriotic Americans to contribute to this fight, rather than relying on lobbyists and special interests who have hollowed out this town and burdened future generations. I prefer funding my political operation through the support of hardworking Americans, even if it means receiving smaller donations of 10, 20, or 30 dollars. Those who attend lobbyist fundraisers can see how that works out for them.