reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Timeline assembled from media outlets traces events around the campus shooting. At 08:23AM a gray Dodge Challenger is seen near campus; 08:29 Robinson arrives on campus wearing a maroon T shirt, light shorts, black hat; by 09:57 he’s seen walking back through a nearby neighborhood. By 11:49 he’s described as hobbling toward the university in dark clothing with a distinctive limp; 11:52 he arrives on campus and moves toward the Luce Center. At 12:15 he retrieves the rifle, a Maser model 98, 30 odd six bolt action with a scope from a drop point in a bush and engraves the bullet casings with meme style messages; changes into dark clothes on the roof. 12:33 he fires a single shot from the roof, striking Kirk; 12:39 police and FBI secure the scene. A manhunt begins with over 7,000 leads, growing to 11,000 by September 12; Discord messages referenced.

The Secret Service records various communications within details, including emails, text messages, and sometimes radio communications. However, they do not have recorded radio communications from the July 13th event.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

There have been new developments in the investigation. The suspect changed his work schedule before the incident, was seen with a range finder at a Trump rally, and later climbed onto a roof with a rifle. He aimed the range finder at countersnipers before opening fire on police. His car contained remote controlled bombs, loaded magazines, and a bulletproof vest. Investigators are still trying to determine his motives and what his intentions were.

The speaker is at a shooting range where Crooks practiced, with targets at 50, 100, and almost 200 yards. The FBI has footage from cameras that recorded Crooks and his license plate, as registration to shoot at the club is organized. The club's owners and management are cooperating with the investigation. The speaker learned firsthand that Crooks was quiet and didn't participate in group events. Shooters would sit at benches and shoot right-handed on this range. The speaker states they are going to get to the bottom of everything.

- Kibbe on Liberty hosts Congressman Thomas Massey for part one of a mega episode focusing on the FBI-identified pipe bomber in the January 6 events and the anomalies in the official narrative; Massey argues he does not believe one loner acted alone. - Massey discusses prior coverage and context, noting a Steve Baker interview that documented inconsistencies in the official narrative. He points to fallout from that interview: a Capitol Hill Police official, who was third in command, resigned the day after the interview; another whistleblower contacted Massey about that officer, suggesting misconduct unrelated to the pipe bomb but part of a larger pattern of investigations. - Massey argues that the FBI’s announcement of a suspect came about a week after that interview and after reporting by The Blaze, and suggests the timing is suspicious. He says this coincidence is surprising and potentially a red flag, given that the investigation had been deemed inconclusive or dormant for years. - Massey emphasizes his own context: his staffer on the Hill watched hours of video to identify who found the second pipe bomb; he asserts that the individuals who found the second bomb should be considered suspects, and that the FBI admitted this to him. He recounts efforts with Kevin McCarthy to release video showing how the second pipe bomb was found, noting that those who found it were very lucky to locate it quickly. - He describes other connections and leads: his staffer now works for Kash Patel; Massey has spoken with a counter-surveillance officer who found the pipe bomb and with the officer’s handler, a Capitol Hill Police member who had previously worked for the ATF and later for Metro Police and Capitol Hill Police. He also mentions conversing with the assistant FBI director in charge of the Washington field office, in a transcribed interview with Jim Jordan about why cell phone data wasn’t used to geolocate the suspect (the provider allegedly corrupted data, which the judiciary committee and Barry Loudermilk’s committee disputed). - Massey references a 100-page report from Barry Loudermilk’s committee on the pipe bomb investigation, noting leads the FBI did not follow. He mentions a lead about an individual in Falls Church, Virginia (a former military man now in government service) whose metro card was used on January 5 and January 6; this person’s childhood friend allegedly used the metro card to approach the RNC/Capitol Hill Club area and take photographs near the pipe bomb sites. Massey asserts this person of interest, plus a neighbor who shared a wall with him, could be connected to others the FBI has not fully explored. - He contends that the arrest appears to derail other investigations and interviews that were being planned. He asserts that a “pro-Trump” motive has not been established for the suspect, contrasting the media’s framing with details such as the suspect’s My Little Pony interest and parental political donations. - Massey criticizes the prosecutor in the case, Jocelyn Ballantine, and recounts concerns about her track record (including involvement in the Flynn case, the Proud Boys case, and alleged attempts to obtain confessions implicating Trump). He questions why she remains at the DOJ. - They discuss broader concerns about FBI politicization and surveillance: Massey references reporters and contact with Kash Patel’s team to argue for cleaning house at the FBI, but notes Ballantine remains in place. He describes eight senators discovering they had been spied on, leading to a legislative push: in the last continuing resolution, lawmakers added a half-million-dollar payout and standing to sue the government for surveillance abuses, a provision he characterizes as carving exemptions out of the law; he says this was supported by most lawmakers, who voted for the CR due to Trump concerns. - They debate possible explanations for the pipe bomber case: the possibility that the FBI identified the suspect and cleared him, prompting no arrest due to exonerating information; or the possibility of a false narrative crafted by others to preserve the January 6 prosecution framework; or the involvement of a patsy or rogue actor. - Massey reiterates his three things he said on Twitter: the bomber was a lone wolf (which he disputes); the FBI was unwittingly incompetent for four years (which he says he questions and calls a cover-up); and it was not a Trump supporter. He stresses the need for more transcribed interviews and explanations from the FBI and ongoing oversight to uncover the full truth. - The discussion shifts toward Epstein files coverage and the broader goal of maintaining public pressure for transparency. They indicate a plan to release a separate bonus episode focusing on Epstein files.

Speaker 0 introduced the topic of cell phone tracking and forensic geofencing data, noting that the same tracking methods used in January 6 were capable of determining whether someone went onto the steps or onto the lawn, and where they were exactly. The question was what findings exist regarding this data in the current case. Speaker 1 answered that the investigation will reveal with great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, whether the text messages involving many questions were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg, and whether Lance Twigg was in Southern Utah or also in Orem. The main point is addressing how he could have known certain details based on terrain, given that he was not a student at the school. It is stated that it would be unlikely to have planned a murder from Google Maps, and that the authorities will determine this from the cell phone pathway—whether he went the day before or weeks before, and tracking all of that. Speaker 1 relayed information from forensic expert Joseph Scott Morgan, who claimed they would be able to track Tyler Robinson from 8 Hundredth Street through a tunnel, around the Losey Building, up the stairs to the roof, from the roof to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, and run into the woods. The speaker also mentioned conspiracy videos suggesting he was seen on a café security system; although the footage is limited, it exists, and some claim the FBI tracked him to that location. The next morning, at 7:15 AM, at a Cedar City Maverick gas station, it is claimed he swiped a credit card, and the phone was followed to his home, to visits with Lance, and to his parents. All calls, texts, and other phone activity are said to be known. Speaker 1 summarized that the forensic expert states that next to the gun, the cell phone data will be the element that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, and that geotracking will reveal where his phone was at all times on that day. The response also notes skepticism about trust in the FBI, but emphasizes that geotracking will demonstrate the phone’s location during the day in question.

Timeline begins 08:23 with a gray Dodge Challenger seen at campus; 08:29 Robinson arrives at the university, parks in the entrance area, and is captured on surveillance in a maroon T shirt, light shorts, and a black hat. By 09:57 he’s seen again in the same outfit. At 11:49 he’s described as hobbling in dark clothing, allegedly per Discord messages, and arrives on campus at 11:52. At 12:15, ‘Robinson retrieves the rifle, a Maser model 98, 30 odd six bolt action with a scope from a drop point in a bush, wrapped in a dark towel,’ and engraves the casings with memes. He changes into dark clothes on the roof and fires at Charlie Kirk at 12:33, then flees. FBI arrives 12:39; Turning Point employees are accused of crime-scene tampering; a manhunt follows, and Robinson is detained September 11. The speaker notes CCTV gaps and Discord communications and urges research.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

"holy shit, that is the bullet." "It matches the exit wound, it also matches the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." "I needed another angle just to see if this was actually fact trying to get as much info as I could before I posted anything" "from this looking at Google Earth and drawing a line from where I believe the shooter was, his tent being set up in the middle of that triangle area would appear that the shooter was up here somewhere." "That's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

New images show Thomas Crooks was monitored by police before attempting to assassinate former President Trump. Snipers spotted him with a cell phone and a rangefinder, alerting authorities. Crooks was seen near picnic tables before shots were fired. He had a transmitter to set off explosives in his car and information on the Michigan school shooter. A service was held for a fire chief killed nearby. Crooks had images of Trump, Biden, Garland, and Wray, and searched for Trump's rally date. Motive remains unclear.

The speaker describes a bizarre and as-yet unexplained phenomenon surrounding a recent incident: people were googling the names of both the perpetrator and one of the victims—the young woman in Israel—before the event, which the speaker emphasizes as very strange. This phenomenon is presented as noteworthy and puzzling, with no further explanation provided within the transcript. Additionally, the speaker notes that Naved Akram was googled 15 times in Israel yesterday before the mass shooting. This detail is highlighted as part of the sequence of unusual online activity connected to the event, drawing attention to the pre-incident interest in Akram's identity. Beyond these observations, the speaker asserts specialized knowledge about firearms and the attacker’s technique. The speaker says, “I know about guns as you know, Hoz. I know about weapons.” This leads to a characterization of Naved Akram as an expert marksman. The speaker contends that Akram “handled the weapon exactly correctly,” with shots described as rapid but steady, contrasting them with “spraying” or wild firing. The assertion is that there was “no spraying” and that Akram’s rifle action was controlled, implying a high level of proficiency. Further, the speaker emphasizes that a bolt-action rifle is “a very difficult weapon for an inexperienced person to handle and to handle to such deadly effect,” underscoring the claim that Akram possessed significant skill. The speaker concludes by asserting that Akram is a man “who’s done this before,” suggesting prior experience or familiarity with similar acts. In sum, the transcript presents three core points: (1) a strange pre-event pattern of online searches for the perpetrator and the victim’s names, particularly in connection with the Israeli victim; (2) a note that Akram was searched online multiple times in the immediate lead-up to the incident; and (3) a detailed, unambiguous claim about Akram’s firearms expertise and method, portraying him as a trained marksman who executed a deliberate, controlled series of shots with a bolt-action rifle, implying prior experience with such actions.

The shooter was on a vulnerable roof identified the day before. Two counter sniper teams were present, with one not needing approval to shoot. NBC News reported that previous protocols were not followed. Translation: The shooter was on a vulnerable roof that was identified the day before. Two counter sniper teams were present, with one not needing approval to shoot. NBC News reported that previous protocols were not followed.

The discussion centers on forensic cell phone tracking and geofencing data, the same methods that were used to track individuals in January 6 cases, including whether someone went onto the steps, onto the lawn, or exactly where they were. The speakers indicate that investigators can determine an individual’s precise movements and locations through cell phone data. The key point is that in this case, it will become clear whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, and whether the text messages that have raised questions—whether those messages were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg—place Lance Twigg in Southern Utah or also in Orem. The main outcome anticipated is clarity about Robinson’s location, but importantly, the discussion emphasizes the ability to reconstruct movements and associations from cell phone data. The speakers note that people are asking how Robinson could have known about certain details based on terrain, given that he was not a student at the school, and they argue that Google Maps alone would not explain this. They assert that the path of his cell phone—whether he went the day before or weeks before—will be accessible, allowing investigators to track his movements comprehensively. A forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, is cited as saying they would be able to trace his movement from 8 Hundredth Street, down through a tunnel, around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, where the shot was taken, and then to him running into the woods. The conversation also references conspiracy videos claiming to see him on a cafe’s security system—claiming his car is visible—arguing that this is not necessarily inconsistent with a murderer’s behavior, since a killer could be in a car while amped up on adrenaline. The speakers explain that the cafe owner could only review such surveillance if the FBI tracked him to that location; they discuss how geolocation and surveillance data would be used to corroborate movements, including how, the next morning at 7:15 AM, at a Cedar City Maverick gas station, he swipes a credit card and the authorities follow his phone, tracking when he goes home, whether he visits Lance, and when he visits his parents, with a full trail of calls, texts, and movements. The forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, emphasizes that aside from the gun, the cell phone data will be the key element tying Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, and that geotracking will reveal where his phone was at all times on that day, addressing doubts about the FBI’s methods and reliability.

There have been new developments in the investigation. The suspect changed his work schedule before the incident. He was seen with a range finder at a Trump rally, observed by security. Later, he was spotted on the roof with a rifle. When confronted by police, he opened fire. In his car, there were remote-controlled bombs, loaded magazines, and a bulletproof vest. Investigators are still trying to understand his motives and what he planned to do next.

New information from Senator Chuck Grassley reveals Thomas Crooke's extensive preparation for his assassination attempt. Crooke joined the Clarington gun club in August of last year and visited the range 43 times, even spending holidays there. His parents did not find this unusual. In 2024, he practiced 3 to 6 times a month, focusing mainly on rifles, with a final visit just before attempting to shoot Trump. Notably, the range was frequented by federal law enforcement, including the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service. Just two months before the attempt, Crooke was at the range within 24 hours of a Homeland Security training session.

Crooks practiced at this range with targets at 50, 100, and almost 200 yards. The FBI has footage from cameras that would pick up his license plate. Registering to shoot at this club is very organized, and the owners and management have been cooperative with the investigation. Firsthand accounts confirm statements about Crooks being quiet and not participating in group events. Shooters would sit at benches and shoot right-handed on this range. The speaker states that they are going to get to the bottom of everything.

On July 8th, planning meetings were held in Butler, PA. Secret Service personnel arrived on July 10th, and the rally site was set up on July 12th-13th. Former President Trump arrived at 5:30 PM on July 13th. At 6:11 PM, shots were fired, and the Secret Service neutralized the assailant 15.5 seconds later. The Secret Service was unaware of the assailant's firearm until the shots were heard. Former President Trump's security detail shielded him during the attack.

The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project identified nine phones at the home of the recent shooter and tracked one to his workplace. That phone was then tracked to the Butler County fairgrounds, where the shooter allegedly did recon on July 4 and July 8. The shooter turned his phone off after July 12. In the process of tracking the phones, one phone pinged seven or eight times in DC at Gallery Place, where FBI offices and source meeting locations are. The FBI is reportedly investigating the matter. There could be non-nefarious reasons for someone to be at that building. The Oversight Project has provided data to assist in tracking this down. There is a question about whether the victim was hit by a bullet or shrapnel.

The FBI revealed new details about the Trump assassination attempt, including the shooter's ominous Google search about Oswald and Kennedy. The shooter flew a drone near the rally stage before opening fire. Investigators are still looking into how he concealed his rifle. The shooter fired 8 shots in less than 6 seconds before being killed by a Secret Service sniper. The FBI's investigation is ongoing, and the shooter's father legally purchased the rifle in 2013. The motive for the shooting remains unknown.

The suspect changed his work schedule before attending a Trump rally with a rangefinder. Security noticed him observing countersniper positions. When confronted by police, he pulled out an AR 15 gun and opened fire. His car contained remote controlled bombs, a bulletproof vest, and ammunition. It is unclear what his intentions were.

We analyzed the drone's flight path during the rally, confirming it flew for about 11 minutes from approximately 3:50 PM to 4 PM, around 200 yards away from where former President Trump was speaking. This position likely provided the shooter with a view of the area behind the stage, akin to a rearview mirror. While the drone wasn't directly overhead, it could have offered insights into the stage setup and surrounding environment. We are still investigating what the shooter might have seen during this time, hypothesizing that the drone was live streaming. The flight path suggests it was observing the scene from a distance, roughly the length of a football field.

The speaker discusses two shooters, one with three cell phones and the other with six. The FBI hasn't opened the three phones, and the three apps on the other shooter's phone are foreign-based and also unopened. The speaker claims Iran may have a hit out on him. The speaker questions why the phones haven't been opened, especially given that J6 people's phones were opened quickly. He believes the failure to open the phones is dangerous, especially considering the assassination attempt on a former president. He notes that having six cell phones is unusual. The speaker says Apple can usually open phones but hasn't in this case, which he believes is why drug lords use Apple phones. He thinks the rules should be different when it comes to national security and the assassination attempt of a president. He suggests punishing Apple or finding someone who can open the phones to determine who the shooter was contacting.

The CEO of American Glass Research was directing traffic with a megaphone during the Trump shooting. At 6:05, the music stopped and Trump took the stage. The CEO formed a conga line to the fence with spectators. Crooks ascended and ran over transoms to his position. The car was located nearby. The area between Crooks' car, the shooter ascension point, the picnic table, and the retaining wall seem important. The CEO had eyes on these areas and the shooter ascension. People were funneled in along the conga line. The Trump podium was a short distance away. A white van was located at Meridian and Lawrence. Crooks arrived at 3:45. The area is a field of action. The bicycle with the backpack was a diversion, stopping police from going in certain directions, potentially allowing Crooks to escape. The second shooter may have been injured, disrupting the plan. It is unknown if other people arrested were spotters. A lot of effort was put into making sure everybody stayed on one side of the conga line.

Speaker maps Tyler's route to the shooting using security footage, starting at 'This pink flower bed is the flower bed that Tyler has actually captured on Ring doorbell camera.' He is 'seen at 11:49' with 'the rifle in his pants' and was 'also seen around 8AM, a few hours just prior in a completely different outfit in shorts.' He 'came down, he scoped and planned this route' and the path is retraced through a tunnel, a parking structure, and a roof 'sniper's perch' where he 'took the shot' before jumping off the roof. The shooter then 'crosses the street, right up into this field.' Officers described 'the wooded area that the gun was supposedly stashed in' and noted that 'almost the entirety of this route has not had a single security camera' with 'All these roads are closed off at this point' as the perimeter expanded.