reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We learned today that the Earth is set on its foundation by God and doesn't move, despite going around the sun. The Earth is described as a circle, not a ball, with God above it. The Bible mentions four corners of the Earth, which wouldn't make sense on a round ball. God created a firmament dividing waters above and below, explaining rainbows and thunder. The sun, moon, and stars are set in the firmament to give light. The moon and sun move inside the firmament. NASA, in Hebrew, means to deceive, so question everything. This information is for entertainment purposes only. Translation: We learned today that the Earth is set on its foundation by God and doesn't move, despite going around the sun. The Earth is described as a circle, not a ball, with God above it. The Bible mentions four corners of the Earth, which wouldn't make sense on a round ball. God created a firmament dividing waters above and below, explaining rainbows and thunder. The sun, moon, and stars are set in the firmament to give light. The moon and sun move inside the firmament. NASA, in Hebrew, means to deceive, so question everything. This information is for entertainment purposes only.

The speaker discusses the idea that the belief in a level Earth is often dismissed as a ridiculous conspiracy theory. However, they argue that it is actually a easily provable fact. They believe that once humanity realizes the truth about the Earth's shape, it will lead to a new era of enlightenment and expose those who have deceived us. They emphasize the importance of aligning our perception with the truth.

The speaker challenges the idea that the Earth is a globe and presents what they believe to be scientific facts. They argue that bodies of water always remain level, making it unscientific to claim that the Earth is a curved sphere. They also claim that objects can be observed at great distances, contradicting the idea of a globe Earth. The speaker mentions that the horizon always appears flat, and Polaris, the North Pole star, remains fixed while other stars revolve around it. They question the unobservable theories of Earth's spinning and the Milky Way's motion through space. The speaker invites viewers to explore more on this topic through the provided links.

Prominent scientists like Einstein, Hubble, and Hawking have explained that it is impossible to prove that the Earth is moving or spinning. They argue that a geocentric model can explain phenomena like parallax and retrograde motion. However, many people choose to believe in the Copernican principle because it aligns with their religious beliefs. This belief system lacks empirical evidence and goes against actual evidence. Some scientists suggest that the Earth may be in a special position, but this idea is often dismissed due to its spiritual and philosophical implications. The portrayal of this belief as scientific fact is misleading, as it is rooted in philosophy. Ultimately, it is impossible to prove that the Earth is moving.

Astrology is compared to modern science in this video. The speaker argues that mainstream science's belief in a heliocentric model, with Earth revolving around the sun, is incorrect. They claim that the sun is actually much closer to Earth, between 60 to 600 miles away. The constellations are said to be fixed and have remained the same throughout history. The speaker explains how different celestial bodies, such as the moon and Saturn, spend varying amounts of time in each zodiac sign, influencing astrological birth charts. They suggest that planetary positions can affect people's personalities and physical appearances.

The speaker argues that the theory of a flat Earth has been suppressed and ridiculed for centuries. They claim that bodies of water always remain level, making it unscientific to believe in a spherical Earth. They also state that the horizon appears flat from all angles and that Polaris, the North Pole star, remains fixed while the Earth does not move. The speaker dismisses the idea of Earth's rotation and the motion of the Milky Way as unobservable and unproven theories. They conclude by suggesting that there are many observable facts supporting a motionless, flat Earth that have been ignored in favor of untestable theories about a spinning, tilting, and spherical Earth.

The speaker points out that in a video by the Weather Channel, it is shown that sunlight covers 60 to 70% of the globe, which contradicts the heliocentric model where sunlight can only cover up to 50% of the globe. They suggest that this is only possible on a flat Earth model, where a small and local sun circulates over the flat Earth. They use a map from the Weather Channel to demonstrate this.

In this mind-blowing video, the speaker introduces the FleetS model, a lesser-known model of the Earth. They claim that the Earth is flat and describe a hidden vortex at its center. According to the speaker, the sun is nestled within the Milky Way like an eagle's nest, and the hump seen at night is actually the back of the sun. They argue that everything we perceive as physical is actually a holographic projection from within. The speaker mentions that science has known this for a century and emphasizes the importance of frequencies and magnetic fields in understanding the Earth.

The speaker criticizes the current understanding of climate change, claiming that their work on the sun's impact on climate has been overlooked. They argue that the thermometer data used to measure climate change actually reflects urban heat island effects, where cities are warmer due to concrete and asphalt retaining heat. The speaker suggests looking at rural stations for a different perspective, indicating that the sun may be responsible for temperature changes. They accuse organizations like the IPCC, NASA, and NOAA of providing low-quality data and hiding information. The speaker concludes by stating that pure science does not support the claims made by these organizations, emphasizing the political nature of their mandate.

In this video, the speaker questions the argument that we can't see the curvature of the Earth because it is so large compared to us. They argue that if this is true, then we shouldn't be able to see boats disappear over the curvature of the Earth. The speaker suggests that convergence might explain this phenomenon. They also express skepticism towards the theories of relativity, evolution, pollution, the Big Bang, and gravity, stating that these theories are presented as facts. The speaker encourages critical thinking and questions why people enjoy being lied to.

Speaker 0 presents a deep-dive critique of globe Earth claims, arguing there is legitimacy to a flat-Earth view. He starts by examining NASA’s most recent globe image from outer space, noting stars in the background and claiming the picture is from twenty-something years ago, and comparing two NASA globe images showing the United States at different sizes “in the very next year,” questioning how that is possible. He asserts the globe image has “copied and pasted clouds” and asks if the globe was made in Photoshop. He then discusses a moon picture with the earth behind it, urging attention to the sides and asking how the earth could be drastically smaller when observed from the moon, yet drastically larger when you’re about 50,000 miles away from the moon. He claims that, when put into context, “they’re completely lying to our faces,” and describes the lunar module as looking “absolutely ridiculous,” calling it a replica and a toy, and questions whether the buttons have real functions and why ten thousand buttons would be needed. He questions who recorded the lunar module launch, noting that there were no fully autonomous cameras or drones at the time, and asks “Who got left on the moon?” He asserts that the moon landing was implanted as a false reality on the subconscious mind to govern conscious behaviors, linking Apollo 11 to symbolic numerology (11) and stating that the moon and sun are symbolic pillars representing subconscious and conscious realms. He claims the moon landing was a symbolic act to capture imagination and limit consciousness. He asks if the Earth were a globe, one would have to sit at eye level with water to have a perfectly flat horizon, implying a flat horizon because Chicago’s skyline is visible from about 40 miles across Lake Michigan. He states that curvature would be eight inches per mile squared, so buildings would have to be level with the floor and would appear to lean if the Earth were globe. He claims there is no detectable curvature on any body of water, and that the horizon is merely how far the eye can see. Regarding circumnavigation, he asserts there is no proof of east-to-west circumnavigation but no evidence of north-to-south circumnavigation, arguing that north is the center on a flat map and that circumnavigating north to south would leave the magnetic field. He mentions Antarctica’s average elevation and its role in “holding all of the waters in,” and notes no country has a flag shape for its nation, while Antarctica does. He calls attention to the Antarctic Treaty and contrasts it with Greenland, and mentions crepuscular rays as evidence of a local sun, and claims that if the sun were 93 million miles away, light rays would be perfectly parallel and seasons would be explained differently. He claims the moon gives off its own light, with a few degrees colder Fahrenheit than the surrounding atmosphere, which would not be possible if the moon merely reflects the sun’s light. He references a model visually and asserts that what is shown makes no sense if the Earth is a globe. He concludes by saying the video is “the tip of the iceberg,” asserting that observing no curvature and the sun and moon appearing the same size and moving across the sky might reflect what’s actually happening. He ends with, “But of course, the earth is a globe and I made everything up,” and states, “This video was for entertainment purposes only.”

The speaker discusses the moon and its perfect circle shape, arguing that the odds of this occurring after the Big Bang are zero. They claim that there is no force or natural process that could explain the moon's shape and its synchronized rotation with the Earth. The speaker also questions the scientific explanation of the moon's origin, dismissing the idea that it was formed from a collision with a Mars-sized object. Additionally, they mention the alignment of the sun and moon during an eclipse, stating that the odds of this happening are extremely low. The speaker concludes by criticizing the belief in the existence of an umbra during an eclipse and suggests that people have been indoctrinated to deny their connection to God.

The speaker discusses their belief that the sun we see is artificial, not the real sun. They mention biblical prophecies and NASA's involvement in hiding the truth. They show images of geometric patterns in the sun's reflection and rays, suggesting it is not natural. The speaker urges viewers to observe for themselves. They express shock at the discovery and emphasize the importance of recognizing the deception.

Matt brings up the firmament, noting that he looked into Operation Fishbowl, where missiles were allegedly sent up into the firmament to destroy it so they could break through to go to the moon. He finds this interesting and connects it to The Simpsons, which he says shows a dome over us and suggests we’re not going anywhere. He points to old maps, claiming that every single old map shows a dome above us, like a fishbowl, from the 13th to 16th centuries, and asserts that this is why no one is really going anywhere. He asserts that people were forced to accept the moon landing as real, stating that “they had to fake the moon landing to make people believe that we were going somewhere.” He claims that everything is internal and much closer than people think, stating that “everything is much closer than what we really kinda think about.” He says people are told things are millions of miles away, but that they can “trail the skies,” and that scientists “completely block the sun,” and that the sun can be seen as very close. He makes a similar claim about the moon, and about eclipses, arguing that distances are not as claimed. Regarding eclipses, he states that the eclipse looks like a portal. He says he has done videos on this and that those videos were banned. He asserts that you can do a video on the eclipse, stare at it with bare eyes, and your eyes begin to heal, and it opens your third eye. He concludes by reiterating that everything is very close to us and that it is very different from what they’ve told us, where everything’s “like, millions of miles away,” a narrative he says they always use.

The speaker argues that the idea of a spinning ball Earth is ridiculous and unscientific. They claim that common sense and personal experience contradict the notion of a rotating Earth. They also argue that water always remains horizontal and cannot conform to the shape of a globe. The speaker criticizes NASA and other space agencies for providing manipulated images and videos of a globular Earth. They point out that long-distance photography and the horizon's flatness contradict the idea of a curved Earth. The speaker concludes by encouraging listeners to research and discern the truth for themselves.

Speaker 0 asks where the sun is if the Earth is flat. Speaker 1 responds that everyone has their own sun, and there is no "the sun." Speaker 0 is confused and asks if there are different suns in different locations. Speaker 1 confirms that each person sees their own sun. Speaker 0 questions how many suns there are, and Speaker 1 explains that there are as many suns as there are viewers. Speaker 0 brings up airplanes and wonders why the sun doesn't appear bigger when closer. Speaker 1 compares it to a rainbow and states that the sun is not a physical object. Speaker 0 is frustrated and Speaker 1 claims the sun is cold.

In this video, the speaker claims that the sun governs our 24-hour day, the moon governs the months, and stars determine the length of our calendar year. They also mention that meteor showers are cyclical and occur around the same time each year. The speaker encourages viewers to watch a 5-minute video on the Big Bang and criticizes the theories of dark matter and dark energy. They express skepticism towards astrophysics and argue that the belief in a cyclical sky contradicts the idea of a random expansion from the center of the universe. The speaker also mentions problems with the standard theory of the Big Bang, such as the horizon problem and the nearly flat universe. They conclude by promoting their podcast and encouraging viewers to explore their videos.

The discussion centers on sunspots as evidence supporting a broader “Moon Map” theory, with a focus on how sun, moon, and star rays interact. The sequence reviews parts seven through ten, explaining that cosmic rays from the Sun, Moon, and Stars refract off a firmament to transform atmospheric molecules into plasma states. The overlap of the conical sun ray with the moon ray is tied to the moon’s phases, as the sun ray overpowers the moon ray’s weaker light. Lunar eclipses are attributed to an overlap of the Venus or Mercury rays. The group then shifts to sunspots and their causes, presenting a photo comparison of sunspots from space weather data against astronomical positions relative to the sun. A key claim is that sunspots correspond to star cluster formations, described as an overlap of the star rays with the sun’s ray. The speakers display examples of different star clusters occurring at the same time and question the odds that these clusters would be present and located correctly with respect to the sun. They extend this examination to a year-long view, asking whether sunspot clusters consistently match star ray patterns rotating across the sun, and noting that inside the sun disk there is a neutralization of sunlight, which accounts for the darkness inside. Speaker 1 adds several provocative interpretations. They state that sunspots are holes that allow observation inside the sun, which is described as hollow and dark inside. They challenge conventional physics by asserting that the sun does not operate by fusion and that fusion is not the primary operation of the sun; rather, the arcs and current density produce hydrogen diffusion, implying the sun itself is not a fusion device. Fusion is described as an effect or converter, transforming from another dimensionality into our dimensionality. The conversion is said to be incomplete until it enters Earth’s atmosphere or other physical matter, at which point electromagnetic light is produced. The outer solar envelope is described as undefined, with references to Wilhelm Reich and the idea that scars cannot be seen inside. The sun’s energy is described as photovoltaic energy, an electrophysical conversion from a primary force to a secondary force, with the conversion becoming complete once it interacts with the outer atmosphere; after interaction with matter, emission reverts to a reduced form of heat, light, and mechanical activity. The origin is labeled as undefined, allegedly coming from a "counter space" or another dimension with holes inside the hollow sun. The photosphere is described as generating light and being contiguously arranged through little glowing spots with dark gaps in between, forming a veil. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 intoning, “The truth will set us free.”

The speaker claims that there is a hidden truth about who we are and where we come from, specifically that the Earth is flat and motionless. They argue that the pictures and videos presented by NASA and other space agencies are fake, while scientific experiments prove the Earth is flat. They believe that the curvature of the Earth is a myth created by fisheye lens footage and fake computer-generated images. The speaker encourages viewers to explore this rediscovery, as millions of people worldwide are waking up to this idea.

In this video, the speaker aims to debunk the idea that solar and lunar eclipses support the heliocentric model. They argue that during a solar eclipse, the moon does not move in a way that aligns with its usual horizontal movement in the sky. They also mention the selenillion eclipse, where both the sun and moon are visible above the horizon, which they claim is impossible on the heliocentric model. The speaker suggests that these anomalies discredit the idea that eclipses prove we are on a spinning ball revolving around the sun. They encourage viewers to share the video to challenge those who believe in this ideology.

The speaker discusses the belief that the Earth is stationary and provides examples of different cultures' views on the stars. They explain that stars are seen as holes in the sky and suggest that humans come from the stars. The speaker also talks about the practice of sun gazing and its benefits, such as increased consciousness. They mention scientists who challenge mainstream views on the sun and moon, suggesting that they are portals rather than solid objects. The speaker questions the distance of the sun and criticizes NASA for promoting a godless worldview. They imply that NASA uses space science to instill fear in people.

The speaker believes climate change theory is a conspiracy and is "completely stupid." They claim the narrative that carbon dioxide controls world temperatures is false. According to the speaker, data shows world temperatures control carbon dioxide concentration, and CO2 has no effect. The speaker alleges the climate is cooling, citing satellite data. They accuse American and United Nations operations of producing fraudulent data by manipulating past temperatures to appear colder and present temperatures to appear warmer.

The speaker discusses the heliocentric model, questioning the consistency of day and night on Earth. They mention Warner Von Braun's alleged prediction of a fake alien invasion to initiate a space weapon project. The conversation shifts to connections between NASA, satanism, and science fiction. Warner Von Braun's tombstone inscription referencing the firmament is highlighted as evidence of deception about space. The discussion concludes with skepticism about gravity's ability to hold water on a spinning Earth. Translation: The speaker talks about doubts regarding the heliocentric model and Warner Von Braun's alleged prediction of a fake alien invasion. They discuss connections between NASA, satanism, and science fiction, pointing out Warner Von Braun's tombstone inscription as evidence of deception about space. The conversation ends with skepticism about gravity's ability to hold water on a spinning Earth.

The speaker discusses the concept of motion on Earth and how it relates to the heliocentric theory. They explain that if the Earth is constantly moving, we wouldn't necessarily feel it, just like how we don't feel the motion when we're in a plane. However, the heliocentric theory states that the Earth is not only moving in a straight line but also rotating around the sun, which is rotating around the galaxy, and so on. The speaker mentions that according to this theory, we are moving at a high speed. They also mention the existence of counter-rotating forces and suggest that the universe has a magical quality that cannot be explained by physics. The speaker criticizes the use of math to explain the Earth's motion instead of relying on empirical science.

Speaker 0 claims that all planets and space are fake, distancing people from God. Speaker 1 is skeptical, but Speaker 0 insists that planets are named after false gods and are not real. They argue that pictures of planets are CGI, except for blurry ones that resemble stars. Speaker 1 mentions footage from the Mars rover, but Speaker 0 dismisses it as a matter of faith, comparing it to the moon landing. Speaker 1 questions why there would be such an elaborate lie, and Speaker 0 suggests it is to divert people from God and profit from the deception through NASA funding.