reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There is no society anymore. Instead, a transnational security elite is using taxpayer money to carve up the world. To combat this, we must not just petition, but take over. We need to build our own networks of strength and mutual value to challenge the warmongers in our country and others. They have formed an alliance to take money from the United States, NATO countries, Australia, and launder it through Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, and wash that money in people's blood.

There is a transnational security elite using tax money to carve up the world. To combat them, we must not petition but take over. We need to build our own networks to challenge warmongers in the US and other countries who are allied to profit from wars in places like Yemen and Pakistan, where money and lives are at stake.

The speaker argues that when a politician claims support, they are really loyal to a vast international banking dynasty—a Masonic cult with no loyalty to the people whatsoever. This system will offer them gold or lead, and to thrive within it, they must play by its rules. It is not a nation, but the fatherland of a global corporate mafia who rule from behind the veil, the deep state. Their primary jobs are to keep you divided by playing into the left and right paradigm while ensuring that the foreign conquest continues. War is something that they will always agree upon. In other words, you are being used to facilitate and fund their global conquest of other countries. Wars are cleverly marketed and justified by their bought and paid for politicians and their complicit media machine. They fund small terrorist proxy forces which are then attributed to their target nations. Therefore, we have no choice but to invade and install one of our own puppet leaders. And thus now the nation and its riches belong to them. Meanwhile, you’re all distracted, screaming at your own countrymen because they have a different opinion to you so they can ultimately weaken your society and conquer you too. You see divided, are weak, but together, you are strong. The solution is to pull your heads out of your asses, put aside your differences, and realize that you’re all being played, and identify the real threat, the puppet masters who keep you divided.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to fully control Afghanistan, but rather to utilize it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The money is then funneled back to a transnational security organization. The ultimate goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving success.

There is a transnational security elite using tax money to carve up the world. To combat them, we must form our own strong networks to challenge warmongers in the US and other countries. Money is being funneled through Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, leading to bloodshed.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to move money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries into the hands of a transnational security alliance. This is done by continuously engaging in war, rather than aiming for a victorious outcome.

The speaker claims the goal in Afghanistan is not subjugation, but to launder money from the tax bases of the United States and European countries. This money is allegedly funneled through Afghanistan and back to a Transnational Security alliance. The speaker asserts the objective is an endless war, not a successful one.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to launder money from the United States and European countries back to a global network. The intention is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving a victorious outcome.

The goal is to use Afghanistan to launder money from the US and European tax bases through a transnational security army, rather than to conquer the country. This creates an ongoing war, not a victorious one.

The heavy involvement in Ukraine is likely due to the end of the Afghanistan war. If Afghanistan were still ongoing, the need for such extensive involvement in Ukraine might not exist. Many defense contractors seem to be pushing for extended, low-yield wars. The goal appears to be stretching conflicts out for twenty to thirty years to keep money flowing through unaccountable sources. This approach involves purchasing weapons, depleting stockpiles, and then requesting more funds to replenish them, creating a cycle of continuous spending.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and isolate the two distinct claims made by the speakers. - Preserve the core, verbatim statements for the principal assertions. - Paraphrase surrounding context to enhance readability while keeping fidelity to the original meaning. - Exclude filler, repetition, and off-topic comments. - Do not add evaluative judgments about truth or bias; reproduce the claims as stated. - Translate any non-English elements (not needed here) to English. - Emphasize the two surprising or provocative points: the Afghanistan-money laundering claim and the media-lies argument. - Keep the final summary within 369–462 words. Speaker 0 argues that the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of The United States, out of the tax bases of European countries, through Afghanistan, and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal, I. E. The goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war. Speaker 1 contends that nearly every war that has started in the past fifty years has been a result of media lies. And the media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough. If they hadn't, reprinted government propaganda, they could have stopped it. But what does that mean? Well that means basically populations don't like wars. And populations have to be fooled into wars. Populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war. So if we have a good media environment then we will also have a peaceful environment.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to utilize it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The intention is to channel this money through Afghanistan and into the hands of a transnational security organization. The ultimate goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving a specific outcome.

Speaker 0 argues that the goal is not to subjugate Afghanistan but to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States and European countries, through Afghanistan, and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. The goal, according to this view, is to have an endless war, not a successful war. Speaker 1 contends that nearly every war started in the past fifty years has been a result of media lies, and the media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough and hadn't reprinted government propaganda. He suggests that populations don’t willingly and with open eyes go into wars, so a good media environment is necessary for a peaceful environment.

The real objective in Afghanistan isn't conquest. It's about creating a system to funnel money from the U.S. and European taxpayers, cycle it through Afghanistan, and ultimately channel it back to a global security network. The aim is to perpetuate an endless conflict, not to achieve victory or resolution.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to fully control Afghanistan, but rather to utilize it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. This money would then flow back into the hands of a transnational security army. The ultimate goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war without end.

The objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. This money is then funneled back to a transnational security army. The intention is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving a victorious outcome.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to utilize it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The intention is to channel this money through Afghanistan and return it to a transformable security leader. Additionally, the speaker suggests that the goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war rather than achieving success.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The money is then funneled back to a transnational security alliance, specifically the international security organization. In other words, the goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war rather than achieve a victorious outcome.

Speaker: The way ISIS got there, as I remember from covering the Syrian war, includes reporting from the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOAR), which is based in the UK. SOAR reported that anti-ISIS Western coalition helicopters were airlifting foreign ISIS fighters—not the Syrian ISIS fighters—but out of Deir al-Zor in Syria. And, of course, Western media didn’t report this at all. It was a shock because at the time, nobody could understand where they were taking them or whether they were shuttle them back into the Iraqi theater. Two different sources told me that the US coalition was airlifting foreign ISIS fighters into Afghanistan, which at the time I didn’t understand at all. But in light of what’s happened, the US needed to leave behind a dirty fighting force that would blow up mosques, blow up schools, infrastructure to continue chaos once US forces left to impede the development of pipelines and roadways that would allow China, Russia, Iran, and Pakistan to connect with Afghanistan, to keep the country chaos. Basically, the story of ISIS itself—when we talk about it being potentially a US construct—ISIS K is really absolutely a US CIA specific construct.

Speaker 0 states that the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States and European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal: to have an endless war, not a successful war.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to exploit it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. This money is then funneled back to a transnational security officer. The goal, therefore, is to perpetuate an ongoing war rather than achieve victory.

American taxpayer money is funding the Taliban through $40,000,000 sent weekly by the US government to Afghanistan. The money goes through the Afghanistan International Bank to the Taliban-controlled Central Bank, led by a sanctioned terrorist. The Central Bank auctions the dollars to licensed money dealers involved in the hawala system.

The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to exploit it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. This money is then funneled back to a transnational security officer. The goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving victory.

Alex Kraner and Glenn discuss the Iran ceasefire and the market's reaction, along with broader geopolitical dynamics and historical patterns around war and finance. - On the ceasefire and markets: Alex argues that reading optimism from markets is unreliable, noting that markets can remain irrational for longer than a person can stay solvent. He was surprised by the ceasefire and authored a newsletter piece suggesting the peace was unlikely to hold and that the probability of lasting peace was near zero. He observed the ceasefire narrative already fraying as he finished his article. He emphasizes that the ultimate incentive for war is the conquest of collateral: Iran’s vast natural-resource wealth (estimated at about $35 trillion) could become collateral for Western banking interests. He contends that war is driven by a desire to secure new money-like collateral to prevent systemic collapse caused by fiat money expansion and liquidity injections. - Narrative and hypocrisy in war discourse: Glenn notes how narratives about values, feminism, or democracy are used to sell wars. Alex adds that wars are often sold by demonizing the other side, citing examples from past interventions (Syria, Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, Milosevic, Allende, Ortega, Chavez, Maduro, Castro) to illustrate a recurring pattern of manufactured villains and “slaying dragons” to justify action. He also cites Afghanistan as an example where Western intervention harmed women’s rights and long-term outcomes (mass malnutrition and stunting among children) despite rhetoric about protecting women. - Lebanon and the ceasefire framework: They discuss whether Lebanon was included in the ceasefire framework as communicated by the Pakistani prime minister and why Israel then attacked Lebanon. Alex argues the U.S. may be posturing to present the ceasefire as a U.S.-led result, while Iran shaped the negotiation terms. He also suggests the U.S. was already preparing for broader action, including ground invasion plans and troop movements. - U.S. strategic posture and global ambitions: They consider whether Trump’s administration genuinely sought to retreat from global policing or if transition plans were undermined by the Iran decision. Alex recalls a shift in 2019 where Trump reportedly resisted war against Iran, then changed course on 28 February, risking severe consequences. He argues Europe may bear more hardship from the conflict, with the U.S. potentially cushioning its own impact, while Europe could face stagflation, currency pressures, and social unrest. - European exposure and dollar dynamics: Glenn notes hedge funds betting against European stocks and asks how Europe will fare if the ceasefire holds but the damage persists. Alex describes Europe as cornered: cutting off Russian energy while maintaining vulnerability due to limited alternative supplies (Qatar/US), and the potential fragility of dollar liquidity for European banks. He warns that swap lines could be withdrawn, threatening the euro and triggering inflationary crises. He cites Eurostat data showing high living-cost pressures and suggests social revolts or civil unrest could emerge across Europe. He forecasts a possible major war against Russia as a political stabilization tactic. - Global realignment and multipolarity: They foresee massive fracturing in the Middle East and Europe, leading to a multipolar global order. The United States could retreat to its own hemisphere and rethink its monetary system, with the banking oligarchy remaining a central lever of power. They discuss Gulf states’ vulnerability to Western policy and consider whether Saudi Arabia, among others, will fare better or worse depending on access to U.S. dollars and geopolitical alignments. Alex argues that the broader strategy aims to reconfigure Eurasia by weakening or fragmenting Iran, Russia, and China in sequence, using proxy wars, regime-change efforts, and economic coercion. - Long-run structural shift: The conversation concludes with the assertion that the current dynamics reflect a persistent pattern: Western powers leveraging financial and military instruments to secure strategic advantages, while portraying their actions as defending democracy and rights. They reiterate that the overarching driver remains financial hegemony and control of collateral, with the war system persistently extending into Eurasia through interconnected corridors, ports, and infrastructure projects. The dialogue ends with the claim that wars are driven by banking and financial interests rather than purely ideological aims.