reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The World Economic Forum, founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, is accused of promoting authoritarianism and Marxist ideology. It claims to address global issues like climate change and systemic racism, but critics argue that it is anti-capitalist and seeks to undermine Western values. The organization advocates for strict COVID measures, including lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations, and supports the idea of a "great reset" to reimagine economic policies. The World Economic Forum has been accused of promoting the abolition of private property, which critics argue is a form of communism. It is important to be aware of their influence and protect individual liberties against government intrusion.

Speaker 0 describes the Georgia Guidestones in Albert County, Georgia, built in 1980 by someone using the pseudonym r c Christian who remained anonymous. The monument comprises four large standing stones, a capstone, and an explanatory stone, functioning as an astronomical clock and calendar focused on the sun, moon, equinoxes, and solstices, with a hole in one stone viewing the North Star. The stones bear inscriptions in eight modern languages, with a top stone inscribed around its perimeter in four ancient languages: Babylonian, classical Greek, Sanskrit, and ancient Egyptian. The message is presented as a set of guidelines for humanity, including: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature,” “Guide reproduction wisely, improving fitness and diversity,” “Unite humanity with a living new language,” “Rule passion, faith, tradition, and all things with tempered reason,” “Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts,” “Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court,” “Avoid petty laws and useless officials,” “Balance personal rights with social duties,” “Prize truth, beauty, love, seeking harmony with the infinite,” “Be not a cancer on the earth,” and “Leave room for nature.” The speaker notes these lines as pointing to population control, eugenics, a single language, a world court, social duties over personal rights, reason over passion, truth over unspecified “whose truth,” and nature over humanity, labeling it as the age of reason. The video then connects the Guidestones to a broader cabal and the so-called protocols of Zion, claiming that sustainability is a cover. It asserts that the United Nations (UN), founded in October 1945 after World War II to maintain peace and security, represents a dual image: peacekeepers (“blue helmets”) and a hidden goal of a new world order or one-world government. The narrative claims that in 2008 the UN established a New World Order project led by Nelson Mandela’s grandson and ex-CIA Jaime Ilien, and that prominent figures like Bush Senior, Bush Jr., and Gorbachev supported a world order founded on collective security. It describes UN peacekeeping missions as having intervened militarily in Korea (1950), the Persian Gulf (1990), Sierra Leone (1999–2006), and other crises. The speaker details alleged UN abuses, including decades of sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers, trafficking, and rape in Cambodia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Central African Republic, and other places, with examples of coerced sex, child trafficking, and lack of accountability or prosecution for perpetrators. They reference Peter Dalglish’s arrest for abuse in Nepal (2019) and recount failures to protect civilians, notably in Srebrenica (1995). The Club of Rome, a think tank founded in 1968 by figures including David Rockefeller, is described as shaping UN agendas, with Limits to Growth (1972) and a shift toward sustainability as a unifying threat. The video links this to the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit) and the 1993 Agenda 21, followed by Agenda 2030 (2015), which purportedly expands sustainability goals to 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 169 targets, and 232 indicators. The speaker claims these goals require increased taxation and a loss of national sovereignty, predicting a move toward a one-world government and alleging that agenda 21/2030 serves a socialist/communist redistribution of wealth, benefiting corrupt regimes while burdening ordinary taxpayers. They challenge the feasibility of the SDGs and contend that the agenda imposes a carbon footprint tax from birth. The transcript ends with a provocative allusion to Henry Kissinger and a transition to further discussion in part six.

In 1972, the Club of Rome released the "Limits to Growth" report, predicting societal collapse by 2030 due to resource scarcity and population growth. The World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Club of Rome share the same views on humanity and have been working towards their 2030 plan since the 1970s. The WEF originated from the Council on Foreign Relations and Henry Kissinger, with the 3rd meeting in 1973 setting everything in motion. The WEF's sustainable development goals, along with the UN's Agenda 2030, have led to global chaos, economic destabilization, and the rise of authoritarian governments. The WEF and the Club of Rome manipulate public sentiment through environmental issues, using it to control people. They believe in a centralized global authority and view human sacrifice as necessary for their utopian vision. Elon Musk spoke against world government at the World Government Summit, emphasizing the importance of civilizational diversity to prevent collapse.

The video provides an overview of the United Nations, tracing its history from the League of Nations to its establishment in 1945. While the organization aims to promote international cooperation and address global issues, there are concerns about its agenda being influenced by individuals with occult beliefs and a desire for a one-world government and religion. The video also highlights the United Nations' association with New Age activists and their plans for a global government, including the worship of Lucifer and the formation of a new world religion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of choosing between serving God or the gods of this world and encourages listeners to seek truth and rely on Jesus Christ as their only hope in the battle between good and evil.

Speaker A explains a framework for how the global economy is perceived and controlled. They argue that multilateral organizations such as the World Bank, the United Nations, and the WTO are created to pretend to control the global economy impartially for the public’s benefit, so that people accept the legitimacy of the system while watching shadows on the wall. The media, Hollywood, movies, education, and the school system are tools to perpetuate this illusion, making those who run the system appear as legitimate leaders of a population that is effectively imprisoned. Speaker B asks if they are in the media and if they are controlling the narrative, to which Speaker A confirms involvement but implies ulterior ownership and control. Speaker A clarifies that the ultimate controllers are “the people who control the fire” and identifies the second layer as “the game masters, the financial elite.” When Speaker B asks if the private bankers are the financial elite, Speaker A says no to World Bank as the sole source and reframes: the private bankers control money creation, thereby controlling the media, schools, and cultural systems that shape people’s internalized shadows, values, norms, habits, and even the legal system. Speaker B then asks how this control operates, and Speaker A answers that money creation is central to their influence. The shadows become internalized, dictating what is considered good or bad and how people live. The system’s edifice depends on cooperation; it is delicate, and if cooperation falters, the structure could collapse. The third point is that as the system becomes more unstable, young people increasingly question the shadows and doubt their reality, which makes the system more authoritarian to compel belief and maintain stability because everyone in the system has incentives to keep it running. Speaker B connects this to independent media, noting that independent media are questioning how society functions. Speaker A agrees, stating governments worry about independent media because challenges to the shadows would ripple through society. To counter this, censorship and deplatforming are important, with woke politics and DEI described as enforcement mechanisms to keep the system intact. Across the dialogue, the core claim is that a delicate, incentive-driven hierarchy—centered on private money creation, media, culture, and education—creates and sustains a global system of control, where public narratives mask a hidden structure of power, and dissent is managed through censorship and ideological enforcement.

In 1993, the World Economic Forum’s Global Leaders program, specifically the Young Global Leaders, began, with Bill Gates among the first into the camp. The speaker notes that about 4,000 individuals have progressed into senior positions since 1993, implying a broad pipeline of influence over time. The argument presented is that this setup helps explain why events around 2020 unfolded in a coordinated way. In 2005, the World Economic Forum hosted a large gathering of these Young Global Leaders for the so-called 2020 initiative. They brought them together and had them brainstorm what they would do, informing them of what they should do. The claim is that when 2020 arrived and a big pandemic emerged, these leaders were already positioned and had already discussed how to respond to misinformation and lockdowns, implying a premeditated or preplanned approach. The speaker characterizes this as “Pavlov’s dogs,” suggesting predictability and rehearsed responses. The speaker then references the Global Risk Report from 2006, produced by the Rand Corporation in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and the World Economic Forum. The report allegedly identified pandemics as the big risk for the world around 2020, even noting this risk “for zero reason whatsoever.” It is asserted that the report also identified misinformation as a major problem, predicting that ordinary people might start talking and spreading fear, which would hinder whatever outcomes were anticipated. The speaker asserts that those involved were aware that ordinary public discourse could decrease fear and undermine the “scam,” hence their stated need to stop the spread of fear by censoring information. This is presented as the rationale behind censorship measures described in the 2006 context. Key points emphasized: - The 1993–present pipeline of Young Global Leaders through the World Economic Forum, including Bill Gates, with roughly 4,000 reaching senior positions since 1993. - The 2005 2020 initiative to brainstorm and direct actions for 2020, implying foreknowledge of potential misinformation and pandemics. - The 2006 Rand Corporation Global Risk Report, in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and WEF, identifying pandemics as a major risk and misinformation as a key problem, and arguing for censorship to prevent public discussion from inflaming fear.

The speaker discusses how the world is controlled by a system where leaders like the Bundescanceler or president work for the oligarchs rather than the people. They argue that the United Nations (UN) is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum (WEF) because they are controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs. The WEF creates leaders through their young global leaders program, ensuring they are politically correct. However, they also need intelligent opposition. The speaker suggests that the UN controls people by offering high salaries, free access to various amenities, and a UN badge, but this does not make them more important than ordinary people.

Throughout history, there have been oligarchies, and currently, in 2002, there is an organization called the new world order. They aim to establish a global government, a cashless society, and open borders, leading to complete tyranny. They also seek to centralize and socialize healthcare, making the state the ultimate authority in our well-being. Furthermore, they release diseases and viruses to manipulate and control us.

In this video, Carlin Georgesco, a former high-ranking member of the United Nations, discusses his experiences and observations within the organization. He reveals that the UN is controlled by oligarchs and is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum. Georgesco criticizes the UN for failing to fulfill its purpose of maintaining peace and claims that discussions within the organization are often focused on war rather than peace. He also highlights the manipulation and control exerted by the oligarchs, who exploit natural resources and control political leaders. Georgesco emphasizes the importance of individual sovereignty, connecting with nature, and saying no to the UN and its manipulative agenda.

The World Economic Forum, founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, is accused of promoting authoritarianism and Marxist ideology. It allegedly infiltrates governments worldwide and advocates for globalist issues like climate change and systemic racism. The organization is well-funded and trains leaders in its revolutionary ideology. It has been criticized for supporting strict COVID measures, including lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations, which are seen as infringing on personal freedoms. The World Economic Forum's central theme is the "great reset," which aims to reimagine economic policies in the West. Critics argue that its promotion of the abolition of private property aligns with communist ideals and poses a threat to individual liberties. It is important to monitor the organization's influence and protect personal freedoms.

Forces behind governments, such as the World Economic Forum, the UN, the WHO, the IMF, and the World Bank, are pushing an agenda of control over land, money, speech, and lives, framed as saving the planet and helping the poor. The WEF creates ideas, the UN uses language like equity and sustainability, the WHO creates emergencies, the IMF and World Bank trap countries with loans, and the media controls the narrative. The speaker claims the goal is to break the West by crushing energy independence, destroying the value of money, opening borders, silencing dissent, and instilling fear to make people easily controlled. Digital money, digital IDs, and permanent emergency powers are part of this plan. The speaker suggests that leaders like Donald Trump, Viktor Orban, and Vladimir Putin are fighting back against this agenda by prioritizing national interests and independence from globalist groups. The speaker concludes that this is about survival and urges people to resist being scared, silent, and obedient.

This video discusses the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder, Klaus Schwab. The WEF is an international organization that brings together world leaders, business executives, and influential figures in Davos, Switzerland. The WEF has been criticized for its influence on global politics and its ability to shape the future. Schwab has called for a "great reset" to address urgent issues, but some argue that his agenda aims to replace independent governance with a centralized world government and digital currency. The video raises concerns about the WEF's power and influence.

There have been corrupt empires, secret societies, and oligarchies throughout history. In 2002, a tyrannical organization called The New World Order emerged, pushing for worldwide government, a cashless society, and open borders. They believe there are too many people and want to reduce the population by 80%. The globalists have convinced some liberals and conservatives that this is the intelligent thing to do. They promote a radical form of social Darwinism, where the state controls healthcare and releases diseases to control us.

The UN and Davos agendas align, reflecting the control of a global oligarchy over Europe and its leaders. The unexpected election of Donald Trump in 2016 disrupted their plans, which were supposed to favor Hillary Clinton. The current situation, particularly regarding food and water crises, was intended to unfold by 2025, but the timeline has shifted. Despite the system's impending collapse, there are final efforts to maintain control. The UN could play a positive role, but it is heavily influenced by these oligarchs, many of whom are linked to serious crimes, including the disappearance of over 8 million children annually. This alarming issue ties into broader themes of transhumanism and systemic corruption.

The Gates Foundation was formed after Microsoft's antitrust violations settlement. It funneled money to the World Health Organization, influencing its actions. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board was created with members from Gates Foundation, NIAID, and others. The WHO's funding is mostly from Gates, giving them control. This violates Swiss law. The agenda includes population control, with statements about reducing the global population through vaccinations.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experience and perspective on how the United Nations operates and its relationship with global oligarchic power structures. He begins by noting his initial belief in the UN as a fantastic institution capable of advancing welfare and harmony with nature, informed by his background in environmental protection and sustainable development. However, through field experience, he came to see a different reality: the ground truth reveals how the system serves a small, powerful elite rather than universally beneficial aims. Georgescu argues that the UN functions as a platform and bridge for what he calls the world oligarchic system, controlled by Davos-centered interests and aligned with the World Economic Forum’s agenda, particularly Agenda 2030. He contends that the organization is effectively indistinguishable from, and subordinate to, the same oligarchs who influence the Club of Rome and other major NGOs. He cites his own observations at meetings where participation by a representative from developing regions was stifled or marginalized, while the discussions prioritized consumption and corporate-friendly outcomes over genuine development. A central claim is that the UN and its related NGOs manipulate language and outcomes to mask aggressive aims. Peace and justice are reframed to justify or enable power and war, while sustainable development often ends up accelerating consumerism. Georgescu reports that many in UN circles pursue easy prestige, perks, and funding rather than principled leadership, describing a culture of political correctness and material incentives that ensure loyalty to the system. He asserts that leaders within UN structures and other NGOs are “employees” of the oligarchs, not independently accountable to their populations. Georgescu emphasizes intense exploitation of natural resources and asserts that most sovereign control over resources is lost to global interests. He gives the example of resource-rich but vulnerable African countries, such as Guinea Conakry, where vast mineral wealth is present but political and economic power is effectively centralized outside local populations. He contends that the same dynamics operate across Europe and beyond, with leaders installed or influenced to serve external interests rather than national sovereignty. A recurring theme is the manipulation of fear to maintain control. He links fear to the acceptance of surveillance, digital devices, and the erosion of personal sovereignty, arguing that fear-based governance underpins health, climate, and security narratives. He critiques the World Health Organization as an NGO that operates without democratic elections, arguing that its leadership is appointed rather than elected. He also criticizes the pandemic response and lockdowns as criminal acts against humanity and accuses the system of pushing transhumanist and post-transhumanist trajectories aimed at replacing human autonomy with robotic control. Georgescu recounts his personal turning point in the Marshall Islands, where he witnessed the environmental and human harm from U.S. nuclear testing. He describes attempts to suppress his UN report on the Marshall Islands mission, which reinforced his decision to exit and resist a system that, in his view, prioritizes oligarchic interests over populations. To end, he asserts that true sovereignty and quality life come from harmony with nature, personal consciousness, and authentic human connection, not from UN-led global governance or NGO-driven agendas. He and his interlocutor stress the need for people to say “no” to the prevailing system and to reclaim political agency, recognizing that fear and manipulation are central tools used to maintain control.

Founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum promotes globalist issues and advocates for extreme COVID measures. They push for the abolition of private property, echoing Marxist ideology. The forum's goal is the "great reset," reimagining economic policies post-pandemic. Their influence spans politics, business, and the arts, aiming to minimize individual freedoms in the name of climate change. It is crucial to resist their anti-capitalist agenda to protect liberty and prevent government overreach.

- The speaker found their photo name on the World Economic Forum website under the category “Young Global Leaders,” noting that the list includes people from different political parties worldwide and is described as pushing a super globalist agenda with corporate power among the wealthiest. - It is claimed that even president Putin and others were once “young global leaders,” suggesting the WEF and related networks infiltrate cabinets and governance structures. - The idea is presented that the world oligarchic system holds power in Europe, controlling leaders such as the Bundescanseller (German chancellor) or prime ministers, leading to a perception of a global oligarchy. - The speaker states the Global Shapers community was created as a means to shape the common future, implying an organized effort to influence global policy. - There is a claim that attempts are being made to establish a new world order with rules that supersede and undermine national sovereignty and democracy. - It is argued that UN officials and WEF Davos leaders are in effect the same actors, suggesting the UN is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum in practice. - The claim is made that these elites claim to know what is best for the people, and that billionaires are driving the agenda, with the danger being that they set the world’s rules and pursue a utopian future while silencing the voices and sovereignty of nations. - A sentiment is expressed that the situation is controlled by the same oligarchic ideas and actors, with the response labeled as “Total. 100%.” - Some participants concede debates about a deglobalizing world, but others argue for reglobalization of the world. - It is asserted that the World Economic Forum creates leaders who are then elected by the public, suggesting a pipeline from WEF to political office. - In the United Nations, there is a description of scrutiny for political correctness; those who are not 100% politically correct cannot participate, and influence can be exerted through salary and offers to control individuals. - There is mention of a global rules-based order aimed at combating dangerous extremist views online and minimizing misinformation, framed within shaping a great reset. - The claim is made that nobody will be safe unless everybody is vaccinated, and that there is a need to confront a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of the world. - The discussion concludes with the expectation that the world will look different after this transition process.

The UN and the World Economic Forum (WEF) share a vision to remake the world by 2030. The WEF, comprised of independent, non-elected individuals, has been meeting since 1971 to discuss their vision for the world. The UN initiated Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) with a 15-year plan that expired in 2015, followed by another 15-year plan expiring in 2030, encompassing 17 goals. While the SDGs appear beneficial, the methods to achieve them involve social engineering, centralized power, and control. For example, achieving food security involves funding big pharma and big agriculture, like corporate farms and GMOs, which forces small farmers out of business worldwide as farmland is bought up by large corporations.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experiences to explain how he views the United Nations today. He says the UN was set up in 1945 with the simple purpose “to keep the peace,” but in his view it has become a platform for an oligarchic system that controls the organization and its agenda. He contends that the UN serves as a bridge for a world oligarchy, sharing the same agenda as the Davos/world economic forum, and that it operates in close alignment with actors like the World Economic Forum, Club of Rome, WWF, Greenpeace, and other NGOs. He argues that the UN’s structure and personnel are increasingly selected for political correctness and loyalty, with incentives such as high salaries and perks used to secure compliance, making it difficult for individuals to say no. Georgescu recounts his personal observations from field work in sustainable development programs, including his roles with the United Nations Development Programme and the International Involvement Programme for Europe. He distinguishes between the idealistic aims of the UN and the practical realities he encountered: while nature provides for human needs, he believes greed—driven by a small segment of society and the oligarchy—drives exploitation and control. He identifies natural resource exploitation as a major issue, citing Guinea Conakry as an example of immense richness that is often exploited by outsiders, with local leadership acting as employees of the oligarchy rather than as representatives of their people. He claims that discussions within UN meetings are manipulated and that the true outcomes usually favor increasing consumption and the interests of the oligarchs, rather than addressing genuine welfare. He notes that the UN’s connection to Davos and elite networks facilitates control over resources, leaders, and policies, and that many leaders are chosen or shaped to align with these interests rather than to serve their populations. The World Health Organization is described as another NGO that fits into this pattern, with him criticizing its governance and questioning how leaders like Tedros Ghebreyesus attained high positions without being elected by the people. Georgescu discusses the role of fear in governance, describing fear as the ultimate instrument of control and warning against narratives like climate change and pandemics that he claims are used to manipulate populations and expand oligarchic power. He asserts that fear and engineered crises enable the prescribing of policies and the extraction of wealth, while ordinary people are kept in a state of dependency and subservience through educational systems, consumer culture, and media. He recounts his own decision to leave the UN after experiences such as the Marshall Islands nuclear legacy, where he says US nuclear testing caused widespread ecological and health damage and was suppressed from reporting. He describes attempts to stop him from presenting his findings and the censure of his press conference, which reinforced his perception that the UN is under oligarchic control. Georgescu emphasizes the need for a “quality life” rooted in connection with nature rather than accumulation and manipulation by global institutions. He argues for personal sovereignty, direct engagement with nature, and conscious living as a political act. He calls for resistance—“say no, no consent”—to the UN’s agendas and the broader oligarchic system. He concludes that humanity should reconnect with nature, reject fear-based control, and redefine life beyond the constructs of political campaigns, NGOs, and transnational governance.

We've found that the World Economic Forum is pushing a super globalist agenda, attempting to create a new world order that undermines the sovereignty of countries and our democracy. This organization, along with the UN, is controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs. They're creating leaders who will be elected by us, but these individuals are not employees of their people. They try to control people by salary and offers, ensuring they are politically correct. They aim to maintain a global rules-based order and compact dangerous extremist views on the internet to minimize the spread of misinformation and shape a great reset, believing nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. This involves a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of our world.

Throughout history, there have been oligarchies. In 2002, a group called the new world order emerged, aiming for a global government, a cashless society, and open borders. They seek total control and tyranny. By eliminating national sovereignty and centralizing healthcare, the state becomes the ultimate authority over our well-being. Additionally, they release diseases and viruses to manipulate and control us.

Speaker 0 argues that the UN agenda is the same as the Davos agenda, and identifies this as the main topic of the conversation. They claim that the world oligarchic system has power over Europe because they control all the key positions, including Bundescansal or president or prime minister. They state that Donald Trump’s situation was a big shock and not part of the oligarchy’s game plan, calling it an accident. They say the accident was the first time the oligarchy system acted in this way. They assert that normally it would have been Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump. They claim the process they are dealing with—referring to “this blandemy and all these liars”—was supposed to unfold in 2016 and then be pushed into 2020 to be a disaster regarding food and water. They say the disaster was normally expected to arrive in 2025, but the plan was changed, and for this reason, they believe the oligarchy will not succeed. They describe the system as almost down, but note that there are last moments and call for courage from everyone to say no. They suggest that the UN could be fantastic and Ken could have a fantastic role, but that the UN is under the total control of the oligarchs. The speaker contends that these oligarchs are all connected with a pedophilia system, asserting knowledge that there are more than eight million children per year who disappear, equivalent to the entire population of Austria, and that they disappear without any information. They conclude by linking this to transhumanism and labeling these acts as criminal.

The World Economic Forum's history is not as it seems. Klaus Schwab, the founder, had a team of influential Americans, including Henry Kissinger, working behind the scenes. These individuals were part of the Council on Foreign Relations and had ties to the CIA. They played a significant role in shaping the organization and its goals. Schwab's connections with these powerful figures helped him establish the World Economic Forum and push for global domination. The forum aimed to unite Europe and America and eventually create a new world order. Schwab's vision aligns with the predictions made by Herman Kahn in the 1960s. However, this technocratic movement faces opposition from those who value national identity and freedom.