reSee.it - Related Video Feed

John Watt, a COVID vaccine-injured individual, expresses his frustration and pain, highlighting the lack of support for those affected by the vaccine. He questions why the authorities have neglected the thousands of people suffering adverse reactions. The Prime Minister acknowledges John's concerns and promises to investigate individual cases through the existing compensation scheme. He emphasizes that decisions regarding the vaccine rollout were based on medical advice and that they are committed to addressing any shortcomings. John's voice is muffled, preventing viewers from hearing his full story. The Prime Minister encourages John to share his details with the team for further investigation.

My son loved hockey and got vaccinated despite his fear of needles. He experienced severe symptoms after the shot and passed away shortly after. The doctor failed to properly diagnose him. I want the truth about vaccine deaths and closure for my son. Another doctor confirmed that the vaccine caused his death. Many others have similar stories, and we need to address the issue of vaccine injuries.

The speaker claims to have witnessed a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of deaths worldwide due to vaccines. In their private practice, they've seen almost 1500 patients, previously healthy, now disabled and suffering years later, believing they are addressing the greatest unmet need in the country: care for the vaccine-injured. The speaker believes the government has been fully captured by corporations and industrial complexes. They allege that agencies like the CDC, FDA, NIH, and EPA, along with big food, are polluting air, water, and medicines. They also claim the government is allowing immigrants in, surveilling and censoring citizens, and stripping away rights, with most of the country unaware. The speaker states their goal is to educate people about this and "rescue the republic."

The speaker criticizes the hearing as an inadequate substitute for a bipartisan committee hearing. They argue that there was ample opportunity to go through the proper legislative process in the last five months. They express concern about the lack of transparency and accessibility of the legislation being discussed. The speaker, who works as a paralegal for a vaccine injury attorney, claims to witness vaccine injuries regularly and questions the safety of vaccines. They mention the absence of double-blind placebo safety studies for childhood vaccines and challenge the assertion that unvaccinated individuals pose a threat to immunocompromised individuals. The speaker also raises concerns about the increase in childhood chronic illnesses and questions the removal of First Amendment rights in relation to vaccine mandates. They argue that vaccination is akin to a religion and express their refusal to participate in a forced religion. The speaker concludes by asking the audience if they would vote for a party that prioritizes their decision-making over parental choice and questions the necessity of the increasing number of vaccines.

The speaker expresses frustration with people who blindly follow vaccine recommendations without questioning their safety. They claim that the Canadian government lied about the long-term effects and efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine, citing a contract that acknowledges the unknowns and potential adverse effects. The speaker shares a personal experience of someone who initially dismissed their concerns but later suffered a vaccine injury. They vow to hold the Canadian government accountable and predict a rising wave of angry parents and individuals who will resist the World Health Organization's influence in Canada. The speaker concludes by asking if the audience is also fed up with the situation.

The speaker urges their colleagues in the medical field to do the right thing and speak out against the problems they have observed with the COVID-19 vaccines. They share examples of adverse reactions they have witnessed, including strokes, cancer in fully vaccinated individuals, heart problems, blood clots, and fertility issues. The speaker emphasizes the need for more doctors to join the movement and speak up, despite the potential consequences. They highlight the importance of using facts and clinical experience to support their claims. The speaker concludes by encouraging others to continue fighting for the truth and not retire, as they are backed by evidence and personal experiences.

The speaker took his five-month-old daughter to the doctor for a wellness visit and vaccinations, but he is not comfortable with her getting six vaccines at once, including one with three vaccines in it. He knows people whose babies were healthy before vaccinations but now have permanent disabilities. He wanted to delay or space out the vaccines, but the doctors refused and are no longer willing to see his baby, which has happened with a previous doctor as well. He questions the necessity of vaccines like polio and hepatitis for his daughter. He believes doctors are incentivized by insurance companies to administer vaccines and are prioritizing vaccinations over his daughter's well-being. He asks Donald Trump to investigate vaccination policies and change the requirement that doctors have regarding vaccinations.

I invite Senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana to review my daughter's autopsy report. He often uses hypothetical scenarios involving 18-year-old girls in his speeches, but I want him to confront the reality of my daughter's death, which was caused by the mRNA vaccine he claims is safe. I want him to see the details of her suffering, including thrombosis and organ damage, before she passed away on November 9, 2022. I challenge him to tell me to my face that the vaccine was safe and that my daughter's life meant nothing to him.

The speaker wants to raise awareness about what happened to Alexis, hoping it will aid medical professionals and those helping Todd and his family. The speaker states that administering three shots simultaneously in a hospital involves tetanus, meningitis, and pneumonia vaccines. The speaker claims that medical doctors at the hospital are unaware that there are 19 different brand-name tetanus, meningitis, and pneumonia shots listed on the CDC's vaccine excipient summary. The speaker asserts that Alexis's symptoms are identical to those caused by three known published poisons found within those 19 vaccines, of which Alexis received three.

I invite Senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana to review my daughter's autopsy report. He often references hypothetical cases in his speeches, but I want him to see the reality of my 18-year-old daughter, who suffered from severe health issues and ultimately died on November 9, 2022, after receiving the mRNA vaccine he claims is safe. I want him to confront the details of her suffering, including thrombosis and organ damage, and to explain to me why her life was insignificant to him.

The speaker expresses frustration with people who repeatedly get vaccinated based on information from the media and medical professionals. They claim to have evidence of vaccine injuries and accuse the Canadian government of lying about the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine. They mention a contract that reveals the government's acknowledgment of unknown long-term effects and adverse reactions. The speaker vows to hold the government accountable and warns that angry parents and citizens will resist the World Health Organization's influence in Canada. They conclude by asking if the audience is also fed up with the situation.

I was jailed for speaking out, do you agree? I don't want another lockdown. The speaker presents a book exposing research fraud behind vaccine mandates to a senator.

Hello, I’m Dr. Mike Geadon. I want to address those affected by vaccine injuries and those involved in politics. I believe the materials labeled as vaccines were intentionally designed to harm recipients. With a background in pharmaceutical research, I assert that the COVID-19 response was based on misinformation, leading to unnecessary deaths due to harmful medical practices. The so-called vaccines were rushed and inherently toxic, targeting the body’s immune system and potentially harming fertility. This was not a mistake; it was a deliberate act by powerful entities seeking control. We must stop trusting those who lied to us and speak out against these actions. Politicians must recognize the gravity of their decisions regarding public health legislation. If we remain silent, we risk losing our freedoms and lives. Speak out, no matter the consequences. Thank you.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

If a child was injured in a car accident due to faulty brakes that manufacturers didn't test and covered up with 60 studies, and the government protected them despite thousands of injuries and deaths, people would be outraged and want to help. The speaker asks the listener to replace "car" with "vaccine" and consider how that makes them feel. Millions of parents are fighting to be heard, claiming vaccines haven't been properly tested. Hundreds of studies allegedly connect vaccines to injuries. The speaker urges listeners to acknowledge this evidence and start listening to these parents.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention people with amputations and heart conditions, and question why they had to set up a support group in Scotland. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and state that over 30,000 people in Scotland have had adverse reactions to the vaccine. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka start doing the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by saying that decisions regarding the vaccine were made based on medical advice from experts.

Speaker 0 notes a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 says their own government told them a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2 states they have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 1 says doctors made extra money to push vaccines and were given a billing code to do it, and she has pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 3 asserts they’ve purchased the vaccine that hasn’t been approved and distributed it to the provinces, so the second it’s approved they can start jabbing themselves and pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4 asks why vaccinations were necessary, noting that when going to the hospital for birth, you expect to go home, and then you don’t. Speaker 0 suspects criminal negligence by the government and public health officials. Speaker 2 agrees, saying “Possible.” Speaker 0 contends they pushed a narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 recalls wiretapping, harassment, and charges, and that they didn’t allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1 says Canadian babies died, and police are trying to cover it up by stopping detective Helen Graves from testifying about it. Speaker 3 comments that dominant individuals maintain subordinates’ place through constant aggression. Speaker 5 argues that choosing not to vaccinate is one thing, but being unable to fly or ride trains with vaccinated people and thus putting them at risk is another issue. Speaker 2 says CBC started with a story to implicate her and paint her in an uncomplimentary light to the public. Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of CBC, describing it as a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 3 declares this is the most significant health matter affecting children today, and they are still not investigating. Speaker 2 asserts that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, and how they work together and censored information; all of it ties to this one case, making it dangerous.

A nurse injured by the COVID vaccine has spent the last four years building a community of vaccine-injured people. She asks others to join her in taking down "these criminals." Another individual states they will fight for the cause for life, even if they have to do so from a wheelchair, as they currently cannot stand for more than a minute without convulsions. They want to help people of their generation, who they believe are heavily influenced by the media, understand that things can go wrong. They feel obligated to speak up and will never back down.

The speaker expresses frustration with people who repeatedly get vaccinated based on information from the media and medical professionals. They claim to have evidence of vaccine injuries and accuse the Canadian government of lying about the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine. They mention a contract that reveals the government's acknowledgment of unknown long-term effects and adverse reactions. The speaker vows to hold the government accountable and warns that angry parents and citizens will resist the World Health Organization's influence in Canada. They conclude by asking if the audience is also fed up with the situation.

There were anti-vaccine messages in Newmarket, but some unvaccinated people couldn't attend due to health reasons, lack of information, or fear. They feel abandoned and targeted by society. The speaker's message to these Canadians is simple: it's time to get vaccinated.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of COVID vaccines, highlighting the lack of proper testing and potential side effects like myocarditis. They call for a thorough investigation into the misinformation surrounding vaccines and the unnecessary vaccination of children. The speaker criticizes the government's fear-mongering tactics and calls for a public inquiry.

I invite Senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana to review my daughter's autopsy report. He often uses hypothetical scenarios in his speeches, but I want him to confront the reality of my 18-year-old daughter, who died due to complications from the mRNA vaccine he claims is safe. Her autopsy reveals serious health issues, including thrombosis and organ damage, leading to her death on November 9, 2022. I challenge him to face me and explain how he can still assert the vaccine's safety and disregard the value of my daughter's life.

The speaker took his five-month-old daughter to the doctor for a wellness visit and vaccinations, but he is not comfortable with giving his daughter six vaccines at once, especially since one of them contains three vaccines. He knows people whose babies were healthy and then had adverse reactions to vaccines, resulting in disabilities. He wanted to delay or space out the vaccinations, but the doctors refused. This is the second doctor who won't see his baby due to his refusal to get the second round of vaccinations. He questions the necessity of polio and hepatitis vaccines for his daughter. He believes it's insane that doctors would stop seeing his child over vaccinations and thinks this policy needs to change. He asks Donald Trump to investigate vaccinations, claiming doctors are incentivized by insurance companies to administer them and are more concerned with vaccinations than his daughter's well-being.

The speaker, recently retired from a local hospital, claims widespread disbelief in flu shots among colleagues due to data issues, stating "the efficacy and I won't give you data. You created the data. Ten percent one year, eighteen percent the next, forty percent at best." They describe the flu vaccine given to children aged two to eight for nearly four years as ineffective, with a claimed three percent efficacy at times. The speaker contrasts this with their hospital experience, where doctors, nurses, medical assistants, patient care, and lab staff did not believe in the flu shot, until mandates and recommendations arrived. They express relief at retirement, saying their soul was sick about what they witnessed, and that conflicts of interest prevented them from speaking out while employed. They recount working on high-volume ER days with about 300 flu cases daily and claim they never contracted the flu, attributing this to personal practices: washing hands, taking vitamin D, and using a berry syrup. The speaker criticizes the shift from physicians and nurses to pharmacists administering the vaccine, accuses the system of bribing people with Target gift cards and marketing the vaccine as free, and denounces scare tactics. They observe an increase in vaccination across generations, noting "some of you are my age," with their generation having seven shots, their daughter ten, her son around sixty, and their new grandson expected to receive seventy-two vaccines, expressing shock at this escalation. The speaker references Robert F. Kennedy Jr., saying he fights for them and goes to court for kids who suffered, noting that Kennedy's family started Special Olympics. They claim that in Kennedy’s view, autism linked to vaccines is evident since there were no autistic kids in the past four decades, and allege that vaccines have caused autism. They describe watching a perfectly healthy two-year-old become a "severe autistic child" after vaccination, expressing certainty that autism exists because of vaccines. They forecast their 10-year-old grandson becoming an adult who, at age 40, would be walking in the mall with a diaper and a helmet. The speaker ends by thanking studies they claim are not done and reiterates their stance against vaccines, including autism implications, as presented in the narrative.