reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 said they know “about Butler” and stated that “Trump shut down the investigation into Butler,” calling it “a fact.” Speaker 0 said Dan Bongino told them this when Bongino worked at the FBI, and that Bongino was “terrified” when Speaker 0 spoke to him in December. Speaker 0 described obtaining “a lot of the social media posts” attributed to Thomas Crooks that Speaker 0 said had been posted in the months and years before a shooting and claimed they had been “told didn’t exist.” Speaker 0 said the FBI had “lied” about this and that they called Kash Patel, then later called Dan Bongino to ask what was happening. Speaker 0 said this was not meant as an attack and that the prior FBI administration, Chris Wray, was responsible. Speaker 0 said Bongino became “hysterical” on the phone, and that after a “long series of text exchanges” and phone conversations, Bongino told Speaker 0 to “take it up with Trump,” saying Trump was the one who shut down the investigation. Speaker 0 said this occurred “the first or second week of December,” around the beginning of the second week of December, which Speaker 0 said they had written down. Speaker 0 said that moment led them to realize there was “no good explanation” for shutting down an investigation into an attempted murder, stating “like this is not what we’ve been told it was.”

Intel didn't appreciate Musk's behavior and leaked information to CNN as a warning. The CIA leadership is concerned that mass firings and buyouts could lead disgruntled former employees to sell secrets. The CIA is implying to CNN that funding cuts will result in them selling state secrets to Russia. I question the loyalty of these individuals within the CIA. The FBI is also under scrutiny, with reports from Michael Schellenberger indicating a source within the bureau claims they are destroying evidence. It seems the FBI is getting rid of the evidence as quickly as possible.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss government disinformation offices and transparency concerns. - CISA’s office of mis, dis, and malinformation (MDM) operated as a DHS unit focused on domestic threat actors, with archive details at cisa.gov/mdm. The office existed for two years, from 2021 to 2023, before being shut down and renamed after the foundation published a series of reports. - The disinformation governance board was formed around April 2022. The CISOs countering foreign influence task force, originally aimed at stopping Russian influence and repurposed to “stop Trump in the twenty twenty election,” changed its name to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation and shifted focus from foreign influence to 80% domestic, 20% foreign, one month before the twenty twenty election. - Speaker 1 argues that the information environment problems are largely domestic, suggesting an 80/20 focus on foreign vs domestic issues should be flipped. - A June 2022 Holly Senate committee link is highlighted, leading to a 31-page PDF that, as of now, represents the sum total of internal documents related to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation. The speaker questions why there is more transparency about the DHS MIS office from a whistleblower three years ago than in ten months of current executive power. - The speaker calls for comprehensive publication of internal files: every email, text, and correspondence from DHS MIS personnel, to be placed in a WikiLeaks/JFK-style publicly accessible database for forensic reconstruction of DHS actions during those years, to name and shame responsible individuals and prevent repetition. - The video also references George Soros state department cables published by WikiLeaks (from 2010), noting extensive transparency about the Open Society Foundations’ relationship with the state department fifteen years ago, compared to today. The claim is that Open Society Foundations’ activities through the state department, USAID, and the CIA were weaponized to influence domestic politics while remaining secret, with zero disclosures to this day. - Speaker questions why cooperative agreements from USAID with Open Society Foundation, Omidyar Network, or Gates Foundation have never been made public, nor quarterly or annual milestone reports, network details, or the actual scope of funded activities. USAID grant descriptions on usaspending.gov are often opaque or misleading compared to the true activities funded. - The speaker urges transparency across DHS, USAID, the State Department, CIA, ODNI, and related entities, asking for open files and for accountability. They stress the need to open these records now to inform the public and prevent recurrence, especially as mid-term political considerations loom.

I seek redemption and reconciliation, but that requires truth and accountability. Trust is lacking in those who misuse government power against individuals like Tulsi Gabbard and who have turned the Department of Homeland Security into a censorship tool, suppressing important discussions, including vaccine side effects. We need transparency similar to the Twitter files for agencies like the CIA, FBI, and DHS, which have hidden information for decades. It's been 50 years since the Church Committee hearings addressed CIA abuses, and we need a new set of hearings to investigate the issues that have arisen over the past decade.

I don't trust his explanation for silencing the truth with fact-checking. He deflected blame, claiming he faced pressure from the Biden administration. Now we're expected to overlook that? I also question why there was no inquiry into his ties to DARPA and its LifeLog project, which aimed to create a comprehensive digital record of individuals for surveillance. Interestingly, LifeLog was discontinued just before Facebook emerged. Why isn't there more scrutiny on Facebook and its true nature? It's concerning that these figures may not have our best interests at heart and are merely manipulating the narrative.

Harry Sisson is acting like the FBI not complying with Elon's email accountability is some kind of win. Even school teachers have to document their work; only in the federal government can you be unaccountable and still advance. The FBI isn't going to send weekly reports because their work involves classified, case-related, and national security information. Harry Sisson is a liar and a fraud. Even a major liberal influencer agrees that Harry Sisson, Chris Mowry, Dean, and Parker single-handedly cost the Democrats the election with their anti-masculinity platform. Harry Sisson is throwing a fit, claiming the FBI is defying Elon, but they're doing their job. If they were truly doing their job, they'd investigate Sisson's finances, tax compliance, and throw him in jail for any discrepancies.

The speaker advocates creating a twenty-four-seven declassification office in the White House that reports directly to the president and handles incoming from the United States of America. The office would pursue declassification of high-profile documents, stating a desire to obtain JFK files, the 9/11 files, and other materials. The speaker asserts that the deep state primarily uses an illegal application of the classification system to cover up its corruption. They reference the so-called “Lovebirds” texts from FBI and DOJ officials involved in the Russiagate investigation, specifically Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, who allegedly were having an extramarital affair while coordinating support for their stance against Trump. The speaker claims these texts expressed hatred for Trump and discussed creating an “insurance policy” to stop him. According to the speaker, after discovering these texts, the FBI and DOJ redacted them before congressional investigators and members overseeing those agencies for an extended period. The speaker emphasizes that this is one example among broader claims of improper behavior by the agencies. The speaker then notes a recent development: Strzok and Page received a $1,500,000 payout from the Department of Justice to settle a lawsuit over the improper disclosure of their personal text messages on FBI phones. The DOJ allegedly rewarded them, despite claims that they broke the law, violated the chain of command, and weaponized the justice system against a political target they despised. The speaker claims that the text messages were eventually declassified in full when the speaker became deputy director of national intelligence, allowing the world to read them. This, they say, demonstrates the best form of transparency. With this context, the speaker reiterates the rationale for the proposed 24/7 declassification office: to provide direct access to documents, files, and memos rather than regurgitated summaries. They argue that the deep state completed a full circle by rewarding those involved and that this office would enable America to receive the truth. The speaker frames the next step as obtaining the truth for the country, with the office serving as the mechanism to accomplish that objective.

"Not always. I just noticed that around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses above them." "Around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses above if you look really closely." "Yeah. And it looks like they're cherry picking certain exchanges." "So that Yeah. My dad is super MAGA just comes out of nowhere because they picked it from a totally different part of the conversation." "Yeah. These messages are clearly doctored is what I would say. They're doctored." "I want every single text message." "I want time stamps." "It's it is conspicuous that you are not telling us when this was sent because it sounds like it's when the campus is on lockdown, and he's gotta go back and gotta clean up." "And you have a right to be a little bit uncomfortable about that because I'm a lot of bit uncomfortable about that. We need full answers."

Hundreds of intelligence community members work at social media companies. Mainstream news outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. The censorship was due to the truth being a threat to power. The US government's influence on corporations undermines the first amendment. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you. Translation: Many intelligence community members work at social media companies. News outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. Censorship was due to the truth being a threat. The US government's influence on corporations undermines freedom of speech. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you.

If Kamala wins, the boycott against X will intensify, potentially leading to its shutdown. A Kamala-led administration wouldn't allow X to continue operating. Is there a way to shut it down? Absolutely. The Department of Justice could be weaponized, filing massive lawsuits under the guise of combating "hate speech" and "misinformation." Despite being the actual source of misinformation, this wouldn't deter them from using the DOJ to target X.

Don Lemon, Joy Reid, Stephen King, and others are leaving X, formerly Twitter, citing inappropriate content. Even the Clifton Suspension Bridge's account has shut down, opting for Instagram instead. Their departure reflects a harsh truth: their opinions were not valued, and their presence became counterproductive, even driving some to support Trump. Under Elon Musk, X has allowed for a more competitive exchange of ideas, exposing the fragility of elite narratives. As these figures exit, it’s clear their influence has diminished. They may try to distance themselves from past controversies, but the reality is that they can't escape accountability. The landscape has shifted, and many may soon find themselves returning to X, as it remains a vital platform for discourse.

There's now more to the cover up story of Tom Alexandervich, Israel's cyber chief who was busted in a sting operation. New details say Sean King was silenced by X; in the middle of the night all posts about Tom Alexandervich were removed. They were removed because the Israeli government asked X to take them down, and X complied. Israel, the government agency that asked for X to remove the post, was the very agency Tom Alexandervich heads. Sean King's post alleges that in the middle of the night, tweets about Israeli Tom Alexandrovich—arrested in Las Vegas for sex crimes against children—were deleted, including every retweet and link to his articles. Based on verified reports, X voluntarily deleted the tweets under doxing policies likely promoted by Israel's cyber unit where Alexandervich worked. This lacks a public US legal mandate, effectively limiting scrutiny and indirectly protecting the accused from public exposure.

I was admiring the beautiful American shoreline, getting a bit teary-eyed. Then, I presented the press with "Trump was right about everything" items. I also revoked security clearances from law firms working with Jack Smith. When questioned about targeting individuals, I reminded everyone that I've been targeted for years by corrupt politicians. An investigation is opening into James Comey for allegedly running an off-the-books honeypot operation against me during the 2016 campaign. The CIA and FBI are under scrutiny. There are reports of the CIA potentially selling secrets if their funding is cut, and the FBI is allegedly destroying evidence. NSA officials have been caught making inappropriate comments online about conservatives, RFK, and Tulsi. We're exposing and cleaning out the deep state.

Former FBI agent Peter Strzok deleted all his X posts after DNI Tulsi Gabbard released documents detailing what she called a "years long coup" against Donald Trump. Strzok was a key player in allegations of Trump's campaign colluding with Russia. Gabbard referred the documents to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, naming James Comey and John Brennan as potential targets. A report from Special Counsel John Durham found the FBI could not corroborate claims from the Steele dossier, which was used to monitor Trump associates. The FBI fired Strzok over text messages disparaging Trump. Archived posts of Strzok have also been removed from the Wayback Machine. This occurred after the Internet Archive was designated as a federal depository library by Senator Alex Padilla, who said the designation would further the mission of providing universal access to all knowledge. The removal of the posts raises questions about who is responsible for wiping potentially important information.

DNI Gabbard released 100 documents proving Hillary Clinton created a dossier. Obama's team was informed and then created a diversion to make it about Trump. The bureaucracy and the swamp must be drained. FBI and DOJ career employees who participated should be fired and prosecuted. The federal government was weaponized against a citizen and political opponent because the American people were not doing what they wanted. There was anecdotal evidence this was happening, and now the receipts have been shown. Prosecutions should begin.

The speaker alleges that X is secretly censoring reposts, even when the original post has no warnings. They urge users to check their reposts to see if they are being hidden and claims they will contact individuals whose posts are affected. The speaker encourages using the system against itself to influence positive change and asks if a video with 40,000 views was rightly censored. Another speaker suggests those who criticize the morals of others are deflecting attention from themselves with preemptive moral strikes. One speaker believes that if Trump wins, there can be house cleaning and shedding light on things. Another speaker questions if Elon is doing the same thing he criticizes, pointing out savior propaganda and asking why Trump didn't release Epstein's files when he was president. The speaker urges listeners to ask the right questions and suggests that Elon and Tucker might be controlled by others.

The speaker discusses a list of individuals involved in investigating him and expresses his desire to investigate them in return. He presents a spreadsheet color-coded by category, highlighting people like Sarah Raskin, who is related to Congressman Jamie Raskin, and John Brennan and Jim Clapper, former CIA officers. The speaker mentions the need to expose their direct messages and communications to hold them accountable. He proposes that Elon Musk release the "deep state DMs" and suggests that state legislatures allocate their electors for the presidential election to ensure a fair process. The speaker emphasizes the importance of exposing these individuals and their actions. The transcript is already in English.

The speaker expresses concern over media silence and the deletion of online posts. Speaker 1 is unsurprised by the mainstream media's refusal to cover or their attempts to diminish the impact of revelations found in declassified documents. The speaker claims the media avoids specific evidence and the voices of intelligence professionals who protested against malicious actions taken by figures like John Brennan and James Clapper under President Obama's direction. These actions allegedly involved creating an intelligence assessment filled with falsehoods. The speaker asserts the media avoids these voices because it would expose their complicity in pushing a lie and hoax throughout President Trump's first administration.

The Twitter files reveal that the federal government, including intelligence agencies like the FBI, used Twitter to censor Americans' speech. Twitter was closely connected to the FBI before Elon Musk took over. Documents show that Twitter engaged in information sharing with the intelligence community, and multiple agencies were involved. The FBI pressured Twitter to act on election-related tweets in 2020 and 2022, resulting in content censorship. Twitter executives restricted accounts, censored speech conflicting with the official narrative, and used internal tools to control and manipulate information. This should concern every member of Congress and American citizen, as it goes against the principle of free speech. Government and media fact checkers often make mistakes, so important debates should not be suppressed.

The left is not worried about democracy, they are worried about being exposed. All the shady things they've been doing in the dark with American tax dollars is about to come to light. If they had nothing to hide, they wouldn't be going so crazy about it. A defensive reaction to an accusation can indicate guilt. We're seeing a bunch of guilty politicians complaining after Elon Musk has been going into the books and finding hundreds of millions of our tax dollars going to nonsense. Just yesterday, we saw Elon talking about investigating federal employees who have a high net worth despite low pay. For many years, many people were afraid of the government. Now the tables are turning and the government is afraid of the people. It's all coming out now.

The FBI forced social media platforms to remove information from conservative sources, claiming it was disinformation. Speaker 0 asks for a definition of disinformation, but Speaker 1 avoids directly answering. Speaker 0 points out that Elvis Chan, a key witness, testified that 50% of alleged election disinformation was taken down or censored, including content from American citizens. Speaker 1 denies this and states that the FBI does not moderate content or influence social media companies. Speaker 0 insists that Speaker 1 should read the court opinion. The transcript ends abruptly.

Hillary Clinton paid Perkins Coie, who hired Fusion GPS, who paid Christopher Steele, who hired Russians to create a fake dossier. The FBI used this dossier to undermine a presidency and overturn an election. When we questioned it, we were labeled as Russian bots. Then, during the election, the Hunter Biden laptop story broke. The FBI dismissed it as Russian disinformation, but it turned out to be true. If we talked about it, social media silenced us. On election night, suspicious votes for Biden flooded in, but questioning it led to losing social media accounts. The Durham report reveals that top government officials, including Obama and Biden, knew about the hoax. Yet, we're still called Russian bots. The Biden DOJ removed the IRS investigative team from the Hunter Biden laptop case. No one will be held accountable. We're living in a world of absurdity.

Censorship remains a pressing issue, especially with recent events in Brazil and the blocking of X. There are concerns about potential repercussions for past censorship actions. Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged being pressured by the FBI, raising questions about accountability. If elected, there will be a commitment to fire those responsible for censorship, including those who misled tech companies like Zuckerberg. This includes the intelligence operatives who falsely labeled the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. It's essential to strip these individuals of their security clearances and hold them accountable for lying to the public for political gain. Disgraceful actions must have consequences.

"Thousands and thousands of page 55. They'll redact every republican or conservative person in those files. Leave all the liberal democratic people in those files." "There will be no cover ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned." "Epstein was acting alone and that the only video evidence they had was of Epstein's personal child porn collection." "We're not gonna revictimize women. We're not gonna put that shit back out there." "If it does, it'll be heavily redacted, and his name won't be here." "What we're looking for is people on the inside of the government to step forward for your private actions to match your public actions." "tips@o'keefemediagroup.com or text us at (914) 491-9395, and we will tell your story without fear and without favor."

Right now, Democrats are too focused on Elon Musk. He's popular and controls the largest platform, X, formerly Twitter. We're missing an opportunity here. Instead of pathetically trying to fight against something that's clearly overpowering us, we should join in. By participating, we could actually influence the strategy instead of being steamrolled.