TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The most alarming thing was the organized communication between the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and tech companies, involving flagging content in large numbers. Four federal judges have ruled that this violates the First Amendment. Former FBI officials within Twitter and other groups worked to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, despite it not violating Twitter's terms of service. The FBI and CIA had their own internal groups within Twitter. The Aspen Institute held a workshop to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Content moderators at social media platforms have too much power in determining what Americans can say and see. This collusion between unelected bureaucrats and tech companies is inappropriate and a form of election interference. The censorship organizations tend to have a biased leaning.

In this video, the speaker discusses a story about Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, in relation to the media and the 2020 election. The speaker mentions Vivian Schiller, a former CEO of NPR and head of news at Twitter, who is part of a globalist think tank called the Aspen Institute. The speaker claims that Schiller organized a secret media exercise to prepare for potential leaks about Hunter Biden. The exercise coincidentally aligned with the release of the New York Post's article on Hunter Biden's laptop. The speaker also mentions Joe Biden's connections to Ukraine and pro-Israel PACs, as well as a photo of Hunter Biden's wife with a tattoo related to Mossad.

The Trump campaign accuses Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the platforms blocked the spread of an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. Experts suggest it resembles a disinformation campaign, potentially orchestrated by Russia. Social media outlets quickly limited the story's spread, with Twitter even suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House press secretary. The intelligence community has warned the White House about Rudy Giuliani's involvement in promoting Russian disinformation. The FBI is investigating whether the unverified emails about Hunter Biden are part of a larger Russian disinformation effort. The president and his allies continue to push the story, while critics argue it is a smear campaign.

The speaker discusses the recent Facebook files release and claims that tech companies are controlled by the government. They criticize the Trump administration for not addressing tech censorship and accuse the Biden administration of nationalizing tech companies. The speaker argues that the government is manipulating Facebook's algorithm to favor certain news outlets and compares it to controlling the oil industry or banning certain products based on political affiliation. They explain that this system of controlling news media was developed through NATO consensus building and is now being implemented in the Western world. The speaker calls for legal action and state-level resistance to protect freedom of speech.

Judiciary committee chairman Jim Jordan revealed that Facebook censored Americans over COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Internal emails exposed the White House pressuring Facebook to remove content, and Facebook complied after meeting with Biden's surgeon general. The Biden administration demanded the censorship of true stories about vaccine side effects and discussions on the lab leak theory. Twitter files journalist Michael Shellenberger expressed surprise at the extreme censorship and the Biden administration's blatant demands. He called for Congress and the Supreme Court to take action against the violation of the First Amendment and the abuse of power by big tech companies. He also highlighted YouTube's censorship of a video about censorship. The ongoing censorship raises concerns about future election interference.

The speaker says Mark Zuckerberg spoke about the Biden administration censoring constituents and alternative media, calling it reminiscent of 1984. The speaker believes those who tried to suppress independent media are enemies of the First Amendment. The speaker says the Senate is seriously addressing this as part of weeding out the "deep state" and changing the "back doors" of government. They claim Democrats are complaining about efforts to remove individuals working for a political party rather than the American people. They believe there is an 18-month window to deliver on President Trump's promises. Investigations are ongoing, often in secure facilities due to classified information, with the Biden administration allegedly attempting to cover tracks. The speaker says they are working with the White House, Kash Patel, Tulsi Gabbard, Leader Thune, and Speaker Johnson on this and other similar issues, many related to cover-ups and the election. The speaker says Zuckerberg indicated that the Democrat party had put "handcuffs" on Facebook. The speaker questions who directed the censorship, whether it came from the White House, FBI, or DOJ, and what threats were made. The speaker presents a document implicating Elvis Chan in discussing potential legal cover for Facebook in exchange for censoring conservatives. The speaker says Chan, as an FBI agent, couldn't act alone, implying involvement from the DOJ and potentially Garland. They question the nature of the threats made to platforms to enforce censorship.

The speaker criticizes Democrats for using voting machines in the 2020 election and accuses Big Tech of censoring Americans. They express satisfaction at the loss of jobs due to censorship and praise Elon Musk for buying Twitter. The speaker then accuses the Head of Trust and Safety at Twitter of failing to remove child pornography and mentions their doctoral dissertation on minors accessing a gay hookup app. They claim that Elon Musk banned accounts promoting child porn but Twitter allowed it. The speaker also mentions a lawsuit against Twitter for refusing to remove a lewd video featuring minors. They conclude by stating that they were violated.

Speaker 1 believes Biden is a bigger threat to democracy than Trump. Biden allegedly used federal agencies to censor political speech, including the speaker's, shortly after taking office. This action is seen as unprecedented and dangerous for democracy. The speaker argues that questioning election results is not as big of a threat as a president using their power to control social media platforms.

Emma Jo Morris, politics editor at Breitbart, discusses her reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop and the subsequent censorship by social media platforms. She reveals verified emails from the laptop showing Joe Biden's involvement in his family's foreign business deals. The reporting was censored on major platforms, falsely labeled as hacked or Russian disinformation. Morris highlights the unholy alliance between the intelligence community, social media platforms, and legacy media outlets. She exposes how federal agencies primed social media companies to discredit her reporting and reveals the extensive presence of intelligence community members in these companies. Morris emphasizes that the censorship was not due to false information but because it posed a threat to the country's power centers. She warns that this undermines the First Amendment and calls for a response to protect the freedom of the press.

The Trump campaign accuses Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the social media companies blocked the spread of an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. Experts suggest it may be a disinformation campaign, possibly orchestrated by Russia. Social media outlets limited the story's spread, with Twitter even suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House press secretary. The intelligence community has warned about Russian disinformation efforts, and there are concerns that the story may be part of this larger campaign. The FBI is investigating the authenticity of the emails. Biden denies any wrongdoing.

Emma Jo Morris, politics editor at Breitbart, discusses her reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop and the subsequent censorship of the stories on social media platforms. She reveals that her reporting showed Joe Biden's involvement in his family's foreign business deals, with verified emails from the laptop. However, the stories were censored and labeled as hacked or Russian disinformation. Morris highlights the unholy alliance between the intelligence community, social media platforms, and legacy media outlets. She emphasizes that the censorship was not because the information was false, but because it was true and a threat to the power centers in the country. Morris argues that this relationship undermines the First Amendment and the freedom of the press.

Silicon Valley is trying to destroy evidence of their misdeeds related to election fraud. Tech billionaires are claiming there was no fraud, despite allegedly perpetuating it. Harmeet Dillon suggests big tech companies like Google have been using algorithms for years to treat different content differently, citing leaked evidence from YouTube programmers. For example, anti-Semitic videos are treated differently than anti-Muslim videos. These companies have allegedly allowed false information regarding the 2016 election to flourish for years.

Big tech and social media are accused of censoring news critical of Joe Biden, potentially influencing the election. Professor Epstein warns that companies like Google and Facebook could sway up to 15 million votes without detection. Silicon Valley's immense power and bias towards Biden pose a threat to democracy. Urgent action is needed to prevent further manipulation.

Elon Musk stated the media is complicit and lied to the American public, spending minimal time on the story of election interference. He admitted Twitter acted as a propaganda arm of the Democratic party. Congress should demand transparency from Meta, Facebook, Google, Apple, and YouTube. Regardless of the financial outcome for Musk, he has done a service to the country by exposing how big tech will operate moving forward. The press colluded to interfere in the 2020 election, particularly regarding the Hunter Biden story. This was malfeasance, active collusion between the FBI, DHS, DNI, FEC, Twitter, and big tech, to steal the country. Republicans in Congress need to act. To win future elections, Republicans need open platforms like Twitter and Facebook, not just Fox News. There is relentless targeting, including Facebook fact-checking, Google banning, YouTube banning, and Twitter shadow banning.

The speaker discusses the power held by social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. They highlight that these platforms have the ability to make decisions without explanation or transparency. They can secretly ban or limit the reach of certain political candidates or content, potentially influencing elections. Elon Musk is mentioned as someone who believes these actions are justified, as he sees himself as a supporter of free speech and open-mindedness.

The Aspen Institute held a workshop attended by major media and social media platforms to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. This was concerning as there was no evidence of the laptop's existence, yet efforts were made to influence media coverage. Content moderators on platforms like Twitter have significant power in determining what Americans can say and see. It is inappropriate for unelected bureaucrats or tech companies to collude in influencing speech and information. The government and big tech should not decide who can speak on social media platforms; it should be decided by the people. This censorship can be seen as a form of election interference, as seen in the CTI League case where individuals displayed strong partisan bias.

The speaker claims that big tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Twitter coordinated with the government to censor information on various topics, including the Hunter Biden laptop story, negative economic information, conservative opinions on COVID vaccines and lockdowns, and jokes about President Biden. The judge in the court case called this censorship Orwellian and the largest attack on free speech in US history. The speaker argues that the American people deserve to know the facts and that their inquiry into the matter is legitimate, despite media headlines suggesting otherwise. They also criticize the White House for urging news agencies to scrutinize their investigation and question why the president won't provide requested information if there is no impropriety. The speaker extends an open invitation for President Biden and others involved to come forward and clear their names.

Mark Zuckerberg admitted the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook to censor COVID-19 content and information regarding the laptop. Speaker 1 states this confirms what many already knew and praises Zuckerberg for speaking out. They highlight Kamala Harris's focus on "freedom" in her campaign, including during debates and speeches at the Democratic convention. However, Speaker 1 argues Zuckerberg's admission exposes Harris and Biden for censoring free speech through Facebook. Speaker 1 concludes that Harris's words do not align with her actions and urges people to examine her record when considering her fitness for the presidency.

The speaker sued the Biden administration and won. According to the speaker, discovery revealed that 37 hours after Biden's inauguration, a White House group was appointed to censor the speaker and others. The speaker claims to have emails between this group and Mark Zuckerberg, as well as people at Twitter. The speaker credits Elon Musk with making these emails public and believes Musk is essential to free speech in the U.S. because he opened up Twitter. The speaker states that Musk released these documents to journalists against the advice of his attorneys.

Google's influence on elections is a concern for many. The speaker, who leans left politically, is troubled by the fact that a private company like Google can undermine democracy without any restrictions. They give an example of how Democrats in Florida received reminders to vote on Google's homepage, while conservatives did not. They believe this is a blatant display of power. The speaker also suggests that Trump beat the cheat in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, highlighting the small margin of victory in key swing states. They claim that if Google's influence is factored out, Trump would have won 11 out of 13 swing states in 2020.

A major American newspaper published a story about a presidential candidate, but tech monopolies censored it, preventing the public from reading it. The story involves emails detailing Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, and how his father, then Vice President Joe Biden, intervened to help his son. The emails came from a laptop left at a Delaware repair shop. The shop owner gave the laptop to the FBI and a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani's office. Facebook announced it would censor the story, and Twitter locked The New York Post's account and prevented users from sharing the story, claiming it was potentially harmful. Hunter Biden referred to his father as "my guy" while trying to extract more money from Burisma. An executive at Burisma said they needed Hunter Biden's influence to stop politically motivated actions. Another email revealed that the executive met with Joe Biden in DC at Hunter's invitation. Joe Biden previously denied knowing what his son was doing at Burisma. In 2018, Joe Biden said he got a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma fired. A photo also surfaced of Joe and Hunter Biden golfing with a Burisma board member.

Google, Facebook, and others were caught cheating in the last election, referencing "51 agents" and the laptop. It was claimed that they affected the election by many points. The speaker stated that anyone caught cheating in the election will be pursued more aggressively than ever before because they are a threat. Democrats are described as the real threat to democracy.

The Biden family is accused of being corrupt, engaging in extortion, bribery, influence peddling, and tax fraud. It is claimed that executive branch agencies of the Biden administration are involved and have been weaponized to cover up these crimes. This is not a conspiracy theory, but supported by evidence. The hearing aims to expose this corruption and government cover-up. A federal court has affirmed that the White House, Department of Justice, and FBI coerced social media platforms to censor conservative viewpoints.