reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The official 9/11 story involves 19 hijackers, led by Mohammed Atta, outwitting America's defense systems despite the US military defense drill code named Vigilant Guardian that simulated the exact events of nine eleven.. Three buildings fell in New York, including the Twin Towers and Building 7, with the latter collapsing in a manner resembling controlled demolition. The investigation was underfunded, and the official story is riddled with inconsistencies, including recovered hijacker passports and the failure to identify plane wreckage. Osama bin Laden denied involvement, and the Taliban offered extradition under due process. Evidence suggests a conspiracy beyond the official narrative, involving traitors within the US government, dual nationals, and Jewish Israelis motivated by a "new Pearl Harbor" event to justify perpetual war.

"The amount of energy required to melt the girders, the steel in the tower, cannot be gotten to a melt point with the fuel that was in the airplane." "Not possible." "So any melting did not occur as a result of the hit from the airplane." "What are the puffs of smoke coming from? Well, they claim they're from the collapsing floors." "No, no, no. Those puffs of smoke are controlled demolitions." "That's exactly what they are, because that's exactly how they work." "The collapse of the building was caused by controlled demolition." "Building 7, the owner. He is heard on the video. Okay? And he says, pull it. It's pull it." "And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse." "And that's when the LINK-seven blew up."

Architects and Engineers discuss the collapse of Building 7 on 9/11, questioning the official explanation of office fires causing the collapse. They present evidence of controlled demolition, including molten steel, thermite residue, and eyewitness accounts of explosions. They call for an independent investigation backed by 9/11 families and technical professionals worldwide. The lack of investigation into explosives by NIST is criticized, and the need for a thorough examination of the evidence is emphasized. Ultimately, they urge people to look at the evidence and demand the truth.

On 9/11, Israeli-owned Odigo, located two blocks from the World Trade Center, received warnings about an impending attack two hours beforehand. This information was shared with Israeli and US authorities, yet the public heard nothing. Around 4,000 Israelis were believed to be in the area, but remarkably, only four died. Larry Silverstein, a close friend of Bibi Netanyahu, leased the Twin Towers just six weeks before the attacks, securing a terrorism insurance policy that netted him $4.5 billion. Coincidentally, Silverstein changed his usual morning routine of breakfast meetings at the World Trade Center on 9/11, saving his life. These events raise serious questions about the official narrative and the lack of transparency surrounding 9/11. Dismissing these concerns as "conspiracy theories" or "anti-American" is unacceptable.

The speaker believes it's impossible for a plane alone to penetrate the World Trade Center towers, suggesting bombs exploded simultaneously with the plane impact. The speaker claims the building's unique construction, with steel on the outside, should have made it impenetrable. Another speaker describes seeing the plane impact Building Number 2 and an explosion erupting from the other side almost instantly. The first speaker reiterates the belief that the planes contained more than just fuel and were traveling at high speeds, seemingly descending into the building to gain additional momentum. The speaker emphasizes the buildings' robust steel construction and concludes that the destruction was caused by more than just the planes themselves. The speaker believes the event has fundamentally changed the country.

The speaker witnessed the collapse of a building after a shockwave and windows breaking. In 2004, they saw Larry Silverstein on a show where he mentioned that Building 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition. The speaker contacted the History Channel to obtain a copy of the show but was told it was not available. Questions remain about whether the building's collapse was due to safety measures or the earlier attacks.

"for years before nine eleven, TV shows and movies were dropping what looks like hints of nine eleven." "In The Simpsons, a magazine cover shows a big nine next to the Twin Towers, which looks like nineeleven." "In the movie The Matrix, Neil's passport expired on 09/11/2001." "three buildings actually collapsed that day? This is Building 7, which housed extensive financial records and federal agencies." "It fell in a free fall and news anchors even reported about it falling before it even happened." "Larry Silverstein, the lease holder of the World Trade Center had just taken out a multi billion dollar insurance policy which included terrorism and he got $4,500,000,000 roughly."

Building 7's collapse raises questions about the Twin Towers. Architects and engineers find the official story of the towers' collapse questionable. The upper block of the North Tower did not drive the building down as claimed; it disintegrated before any downward motion. Eyewitnesses reported explosions throughout the building, not included in the official report. Structural steel sections were ejected laterally at high speeds, indicating a controlled demolition. Over 22,100 professionals demand a real investigation.

Nine eleven started as commercial insurance fraud. It was known in 1988 that the Twin Towers were condemned because they didn't wanna pay the $2,000,000,000 to dismantle the buildings the hard way. Controlled demolitions was forbidden. When that was briefed to Dick Cheney as secretary of defense, I believe he said, praise the lord. This is going to be a terrorism event that will give us a reason for invading Iraq and Afghanistan. And at that point, the nine eleven, which was planned and executed by the Zionists, which is not the Jews. When I say Zionists, I'm talking about what's called the red mafia. That's the Russians, Israelis, and Americans who are a criminal network that happens to control Benjamin Netanyahu. It does not control Donald Trump. People don't understand that Trump is biding his time. The NSA is not about solving problems or making America safe. It's about keeping the money moving. The second reason that the program was canceled was because it was starting to reveal all of the Americans who were complicit in nine eleven. The problem we have in The United States is that the intelligence community is all about spending a great deal of money doing very bad things. So let's say overall, there's about 300 things that the intelligence community should be reporting on. They don't. They report on two things, war and terrorism. And in both cases, they're the ones starting the wars and funding the terrorists.

Johnny introduces a discussion on Fight Club’s alleged nine-eleven predictive programming. Johnn y asserts Fight Club, produced by Arnon Milchan, an admitted Israeli spy, was released in 1999, two years before the attack; Milchan also produced The Medusa Touch in 1978, 23 years before the attack. He claims Milchan wasn’t alone; in 1980, journalist Mike Evans dined with Issa Harrell, former head of Mossad, who allegedly said terror would come to America and that the first attack would be New York City’s tallest building, noting the World Trade Center sphere as a barrier that stood between the city’s tallest structures. The discussion escalates into a broader conspiracy: Operation Lockheed Thunder, the destruction of a World Trade Center sphere, and the notion that Mossad foreknew 9/11 and celebrated it rather than stopping it. The narrative cites a witness who observed five Israeli men taking photographs of the burning towers from a New Jersey van; the FBI investigated three questions about these men and any advanced knowledge, and the men claimed they were documenting the event for Urban Moving Systems. They even appeared on an Israeli talk show to discuss their actions. The program discusses Mossad’s alleged pre-9/11 warnings to the United States about a coming attack in North America, hijackings, and aircraft used as flying bombs, with claims that 4,000 Israeli or Jewish people in the New York City area were warned not to go to work. It covers media coverage of an Israeli instant messaging service, Otago, used to warn Israelis about an attack, and purported ties between Otago, Converse, and an Israeli intelligence officer. The narrative asserts that 4,000 Israeli citizens worked in the World Trade Center and Pentagon, with only five deaths, at least one of whom was a Mossad agent. It alleges that Zim, an Israeli shipping company partially owned by the Israeli government, moved out of the World Trade Center a week before 9/11, citing the president’s remarks about warnings. It asserts that two Israeli billionaires, Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy, purchased the World Trade Center lease seven weeks before 9/11 and collected $4.5 billion in insurance after the attacks, alleging difficulties with insurance payouts that were eventually resolved after political intervention; Silverstein allegedly redesigned the World Trade Center in 2000 while the buildings were still standing. The text links Milchan and Bibi Netanyahu to foreknowledge of 9/11, with Netanyahu having worked for Milchan at Helai Trading Company, allegedly smuggling US nuclear technology to Israel. It mentions Richard Kelly Smythe’s FBI-declassified documents naming Netanyahu as Milchan’s contact. It presents Netanyahu’s statements that the attack benefited Israel, and contrasts this with Barak’s remarks on television about a global concerted effort against terror and the post-9/11 momentum for war with Iraq, Iran, and Libya. The transcript connects Rupert Murdoch, Milchan’s associate, to The Lone Gunman pilot episode (2000) depicting a passenger plane hijacked remotely and aimed at the World Trade Center, aired six months before 9/11. It notes four war-game simulations on the morning of 9/11, including airline counterterrorism scenarios, and suggests room for confusion or deliberate misdirection; it states two hijackers had Mossad connections, including Ziyad Jarrah’s cousin Ali Al Jarrah and four Mossad agents living near Muhammad Atta. Additional figures are named: Rabbi Dob Zakhan, SPC software for remote aircraft control, and Rebuilding America’s Defenses author; Daniel Lewin, an Israeli Special Forces member and Akamai founder, who allegedly had foreknowledge and was aboard United Airlines Flight 11. The dialogue ends with a depiction of the hijacking, detailing attempts to override flight controls, flying toward New York City and the World Trade Center, as the team attempts to hack the aircraft’s navigation and autopilot systems.

I spoke with contacts at the Army War College and Headquarters Marine Corps, informing them that 9/11 was a controlled demolition. I showed them footage of the third building at the World Trade Center collapsing, indicating that all the buildings were wired for demolition. If Americans ever find out that Israel was behind this, they will retaliate without considering the consequences. The Zionists are playing a high-stakes game, as losing this battle would result in their downfall. The evidence is clear: three buildings collapsed, and the third was not hit by a plane. When I presented this information, everyone agreed that Israel was responsible for 9/11.

Eyewitnesses describe explosions at the World Trade Center, with initial confusion about the cause. Some report seeing a plane strike the tower, while others claim it was a bomb. A professor alleges 9/11 was an inside job, claiming the government's OBL story is fiction. He suggests a frame-by-frame analysis of the South Tower impact reveals a "cartoon display," arguing an aluminum plane couldn't penetrate the building as depicted. Others claim there was no plane visible in certain shots. Eyewitnesses describe a large explosion sound and debris, with one reporting the elevator blew up. Another witness near the Pentagon claims there was no plane debris, just a hole in the ground. Some suggest the collapse of the towers resembled a controlled demolition, citing consecutive "bangs" and a waterfall-like descent. One person claims it's impossible for a building to collapse like that unless all columns are blown up simultaneously. A reporter references the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 during a live broadcast while the building was still standing. A speaker claims the government's conspiracy theory involves Islamic radicals armed with box cutters defeating the air defense system, and questions whether to believe the government or the people who lived through it.

Questions are raised about the events of 9/11. Why did the World Trade Center owner obtain maximum terrorist attack insurance six weeks prior and skip his daily breakfast there on 9/11? Why did Rumsfeld discuss trillions of dollars missing the day before? The inability to track $2.3 trillion in transactions is mentioned. Other questions include: Why was CNN on site before the attacks? Why were short sales purchased against airline companies beforehand? Why were all passengers incinerated, but a terrorist's passport survived? Why did George W. Bush's administration publish a report a year prior stating the need to aggressively expand military power worldwide, requiring a "Pearl Harbor level event" for public support?

The speaker claims the only high-rise buildings to collapse from airplane impacts were the World Trade Center towers. They cite an architect's report stating the buildings were designed to withstand such impacts. One speaker says the collapses defied physics, stating that the upper sections should have destroyed the lower sections, not crushed them. Another speaker says the collapse of Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, resembled a controlled demolition. A fire battalion chief, Oriole Palmer, reported being on the 78th floor, the floor of impact, and said they had two fires under control one minute before the building collapsed. The speaker alleges a cover-up related to 9/11, claiming the 9/11 Commission was part of it, led by Philip Zelikow, who was allegedly handpicked by Condoleezza Rice. They say Zelikow met with Tony Schaeffer in Afghanistan and then targeted him upon his return to the US. The speaker says they called it a scandal bigger than Watergate.

Former Pennsylvania GOP rep Kurt Weldon is calling for a Trump administration investigation into 9/11, claiming it will be the "biggest scandal in American history." He questions the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, noting they are the only high-rises to ever collapse from airplane impacts, and that they were designed to withstand such impacts. A firefighter who ascended to the 78th floor of one of the towers reported two controllable fires moments before the building's collapse. Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, also collapsed. An insurance expert stated that a 47-story building doesn't just collapse from fire. A BBC report announced the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC 7) while it was still standing in the background. Larry Silverstein, the World Trade Center leaseholder, stated that "they made the decision to pull Building 7," implying a controlled demolition. The speaker suggests that the truth about 9/11 could change the country, referencing the Patriot Act and TSA checkpoints as consequences of the event.

The interviewer confronts Larry Silverstein about conspiracy theories surrounding the collapse of Building 7 on 9/11. Silverstein's previous comments on PBS are mentioned, where he stated that they decided to "pull" the building. The interviewer questions whether it was Silverstein himself who made the decision, as firefighters were already outside the building by then. The fire chief denies speaking to Silverstein on that day. The interviewer also mentions testimony about bombs in the building before its collapse. Silverstein is asked to address these questions and theories. The interviewer is eventually escorted out, but insists on the legitimacy of their questions. It is noted that Silverstein and his family did not go to work on 9/11 and had insurance policies on the buildings.

The transcript questions the official narrative of 9/11, citing anomalies and inconsistencies. It is claimed that Hannehan Yuer was a terrible pilot, yet supposedly executed a complex maneuver to strike the Pentagon. Some claim there was a lack of identifiable plane debris at the Pentagon, and videos were confiscated. Experts state that jet fuel could not have vaporized the plane's engines. The collapse of the Twin Towers is questioned, citing free-fall speed and molten metal found weeks later. Some suggest explosives or thermite were used, with core columns being cut. Building 7's collapse, not hit by a plane, is called a controlled demolition. Witnesses report explosions in the basements of the World Trade Center before the plane impacts. NORAD's failure to intercept the planes is highlighted, suggesting deliberate confusion due to war game exercises. The source of funding for the 9/11 attacks remains undetermined. The 9/11 Commission's report is criticized for ignoring evidence and conflicts of interest. The "war on terror" is viewed as a means of social control, with terrorism as a manufactured enemy image. Some claim the CIA was involved in previous terrorist acts. Exercises mirroring the 9/11 attacks were allegedly taking place simultaneously. The possibility that the attacks were a setup job is raised.

We saw a building collapse after a shockwave ripped through it, and Larry Silverstein mentioned in a TV show that Building 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition. He stated that the decision to "pull it" was made due to safety concerns. The speaker contacted the History Channel about the show but was told it was not available to the public. The cause of Building 7's collapse remains uncertain, whether it was intentional or a result of the earlier attacks.

The episode argues that conspiracy theories about 9/11 may flourish precisely because of deliberate actions by the US government: suppressing video evidence of the attacks, routing rubble overseas without inspection, branding critics as crazy or criminal, lying about the attacks, preventing an actual investigation, avoiding public trials, and using the raid that killed Osama bin Laden to justify unrelated wars. It claims these patterns mirror what happened after 9/11 and suggests that focused attention on directed-energy weapons distracts from the government’s central role in facilitating the attacks. Building 7 is a central focus. The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 a.m., and Building 7, a 47-story steel-frame building about a football field away, also collapsed the same day. It housed the NYC Office of Emergency Management, the US Secret Service New York field office, a secret CIA office, and a DoD office; its records were destroyed. The 9/11 Commission’s 577-page report offered no explanation for Building 7’s collapse, prompting questions for a Senate investigation. Witnesses suggested that a plane could not have caused such a collapse, and theories of controlled demolition emerged, reinforced by studies and testimony about symmetrical, global collapse. Independent investigations, including Leroy Hulsey’s 2020 University of Alaska study, questioned NIST’s claim that thermal expansion of steel caused the failure and argued that office fires could not have produced the observed collapse. Critics noted that the building’s rapid, all-at-once fall differed from typical progressive collapses. The unedited video evidence indicated a two-stage collapse, which raised further queries about the official narrative. Debris was removed and shipped overseas quickly; a New York Times piece noted that some steel columns were sent to mills in Asia without examination, hindering analysis of the building’s collapse. NIST attributed the collapse to progressive failure after a single girder failed due to thermal expansion, while supporters of alternative theories pointed to discrepancies in video, eyewitness accounts of explosions, and the fact that some testing did not reproduce such collapses under comparable fires. Witnesses claimed hearing explosions inside Building 7, and efforts to interview one witness were noted alongside the later death of the witness. Attention is drawn to the broader debris-handling and investigative gaps: FEMA and NIST provided different explanations for Building 7’s fire and collapse, yet neither fully reconciled with the video evidence. The film notes that a BBC report appeared to claim the building’s collapse before it happened, suggesting foreknowledge or misreporting. A key disputed issue is the presence of thermitic material found in four dust samples from the towers, reported in 2009 in Open Chemical Physics Journal, implying energetic compounds, though NIST argued that thermite would require prolonged contact and would be difficult to conceal. Foreknowledge by foreign intelligence is emphasized. The transcript asserts that allied nations, particularly Israel, had information about the plot and that signals intelligence was shared with allies but not fully with the US. It cites the interception and handling of al-Qaeda communications, NSA reluctance to share raw data, and the role of foreign assets in the US before 9/11. It highlights the reporting of five Israelis seen celebrating the attacks, FBI documents suggesting deception rather than foreknowledge, and allegations that Israeli art students were connected to hijackers, living near Them and near key sites. It argues that foreign intelligence may have known more than the US and did not fully disclose it. The episode concludes with a call for a new, independent commission to answer specific questions: who decided to ship debris overseas and why; the CIA’s involvement with Building 7; the NSA’s signals intelligence and its sharing with foreign governments; what foreign governments knew and did not share; and several other questions the 9/11 Commission allegedly did not address. It frames the 9/11 attacks as transformative for American freedoms and warrants public accountability, promising further exploration of who profited from 9/11 in the next episode.

Questions are raised about the events of 9/11. Why did the World Trade Center owner obtain maximum terrorist attack insurance six weeks prior and skip his daily breakfast there on 9/11? Why did Rumsfeld discuss untraceable trillions the day before? Why was CNN present before the attacks? Inquiries include the unidentified group shorting airline stocks pre-attack, the survival of a terrorist's passport amidst complete incineration of passengers, and a Bush administration report a year prior stating the need for a "Pearl Harbor level event" to justify military expansion.

The official narrative of 9/11 suggests that a group of individuals executed a highly sophisticated terror attack, yet many find it hard to believe. Just weeks before the attacks, Larry Silverstein acquired the Twin Towers and secured an unprecedented insurance policy covering terrorism. Shortly after, the towers were destroyed, resulting in a massive insurance payout. Additionally, the Pentagon reported missing funds the day before, only to be struck the next day. Building 7 collapsed hours later due to a small fire, a claim disputed by engineers who argue it resembled a controlled demolition. Questions remain about the design of the towers, reports of explosions, and the background of the hijackers. Furthermore, the involvement of Israeli individuals and the formation of a group of engineers challenging the official narrative raises further doubts about the events of that day.

An architect with 20 years of experience claims the official explanation for the World Trade Center collapses is false. The official reason is that the planes hit the buildings, causing explosions and fires, leading to structural weakening and collapse. However, fires have never caused a steel-frame high-rise to collapse. The speaker claims the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 exhibit 10 key features of controlled demolition. Building 7 collapsed straight down into its own footprint at free fall speed for the first 100 feet, despite 40,000 tons of structural steel. The speaker compares the collapse to controlled demolitions. The speaker states that 700 architects and engineers are demanding a new investigation. They believe the evidence suggests controlled demolitions. The speaker asserts that almost every architect and engineer who reviews the information agrees, but the implications are dark because it suggests someone besides Al Qaeda was involved, given the high security of the buildings.

The discussion centers on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11, which was not hit by a plane. A video clip shows the building's collapse, described as reminiscent of a controlled demolition. One speaker recalls news reports announcing the building's collapse before it happened. Another speaker, with a background in fire protection and insurance, states that a 47-story building doesn't typically collapse due to fire. One speaker admits to previously attacking 9/11 conspiracy theorists but now questions the official narrative, particularly regarding Building 7. An Alaskan structural engineering professor's four-year study allegedly debunks the NIST analysis of the collapse. Molten steel was reportedly present in the Twin Towers. The symmetrical nature of Building 7's collapse is questioned, with one speaker suggesting it resembles a controlled demolition. One speaker suggests they broadened the Overton window on the topic because they were part of the cover-up and feel guilty.