reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 notes that the last administration was not transparent on the issue, but with the task force created, they have guided members within what they're cleared for. He asserts that they have encountered alien beings and recovered vehicles, with physical proof, and that he was partially cleared into those activities, having read intelligence reports from those programs. Speaker 1 reflects that online discourse about encounters and videos is plentiful, and asks if there is belief that the US government knows about alien beings coming to Earth. Speaker 0 responds that he doesn’t like to characterize where they came from, but they are definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. He claims to have recovered vehicles and physical proof and says he had partial access to the data and to intelligence reports. He confirms seeing with his own eyes according to his account. Speaker 2 says NASA speaks for itself and claims transparency with data, and asks whether to believe David Crush or if he is lying, and where the evidence is. Speaker 0 asserts that members of the current administration are very aware of this reality and the current president is knowledgeable on the subject. He trusts the president’s leadership and believes the president has assembled a team; he says if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3 says he has access and has had meetings with very smart people who believe there is something out there, and it makes sense there could be. He is not convinced himself. He asks if the person believes one, that he knows, and two, that he’s open to transparency on UAPs. Speaker 0 reiterates that the president is very well informed on the issue, and avoids revealing more than the president might want to reveal. He notes a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 1 asks about years of threat and testimony. Speaker 0 says he was physically threatened even before submitting his intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration, and sought legal protection because of professional and personal fear. Speaker 1 asks about recovering pilots or remains and whether that was seen with his own eyes. Speaker 0 confirms there were pictures and says yes, there were remains. Speaker 1 questions whether the origin is from another planet or outer space, and if it is interdimensional, seeking clarification. Speaker 0 explains he has talked to many veterans of the program and keeps an open mind on origin. He acknowledges an extraterrestrial hypothesis but does not usually go there because he did not see the data, and he is not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government has. He is not aware of any remains or signs of extraterrestrial beings or technology by his department. Speaker 3 says the US government knows, but asks whether other governments know. Speaker 0 says they know and have their own programs, and notes that two and a half years ago the US has been in an arms race with peer competitors like Russia and China, who have their own programs. He says he was able to view intelligence discussing adversarial programs and will leave it at that. Speaker 3 states that they’ve recovered things, and Speaker 0 confirms, noting there were bodies and physical remains. They discuss whether the motive or intent of the visitors was peaceful or not, acknowledging a mixed bag of activity and motive. They consider whether Earth’s genetic material could be a reason for visits, even jokingly proposing Jurassic Park as a tourist attraction for genetic material on Earth.

The speaker admits to being scared to cover two specific topics: the 2020 election and the UFO story. They acknowledge that there may be some merit to the claims made about the election and that some of the ideas about UFOs are dark and difficult to understand. The speaker believes that the government has known about non-human entities for a long time and that there is evidence to support this. They also discuss the government's reluctance to disclose this information due to fear of scaring people. The speaker understands the impulse to hide such radical and heavy truths but still believes in the importance of truth and disclosure.

Everything is on the table regarding unidentified aerial phenomena. Recently, in a classified briefing, two specific shapes were discussed that the U.S. government cannot identify, supported by footage and photographs. It seems clear that the government is not being transparent with the American people and Congress about these incidents. Congress deserves to be informed to address safety concerns, especially along the eastern seaboard.

The speaker discusses their belief in the existence of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and government secrecy surrounding it. They mention that while there is no concrete evidence of extraterrestrial beings, they believe the U.S. government has had direct contact with these phenomena. The speaker finds this disturbing and suggests a spiritual component to the phenomenon. They also mention the involvement of the Vatican in studying UAP. Overall, the speaker believes that the truth about UAP is more complex and significant than commonly believed.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

There is footage and records of unidentified objects in the sky that we can't explain. It is believed that the Pentagon has been hiding a program from Congress and the executive branch. This program, run by unelected officials, avoids oversight and goes against American democracy. There is a disinformation campaign targeting the US populace, which is unethical. A bill called the UAP Closure Act aims to force the Pentagon to reveal the truth to Congress and the American people. However, there are efforts to kill this bill by Speaker Mike Johnson, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Congressman Mike Turner, and Mike Rogers. It is important to call lawmakers and demand the passage of the UAP Disclosure Act.

Tim Gallaudet, a former rear admiral and acting director of NOAA, will testify today. He will discuss credible whistleblower statements indicating that UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena) suggest the existence of nonhuman intelligence, highlighting that we are not alone in the universe. These revelations are expected to be impactful and reflect Congress's serious approach to addressing this issue as a matter of national defense.

Lou Elizondo, a former Pentagon official and whistleblower, discusses the government's handling of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). He criticizes the administration's claim that these sightings pose no threat, emphasizing the lack of understanding about their origins and intentions. Elizondo highlights the historical context of drone threats and questions the government's transparency, particularly regarding classified briefings. He notes that while some reports may stem from public sensitization, the government’s response—such as shutting down airspace—indicates a serious issue. He suggests that sophisticated drones could be state-operated, requiring significant infrastructure. Elizondo calls for more open discussions with Congress and the public about these phenomena.

Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee task force on the declassification of federal secrets, discusses what she describes as evidence of interdimensional beings operating through existing time spaces. She references photo and video material from classified briefings that are now being made public, including a video “dead dropped” to Representative Eric Burleson from within the Department of War showing a UAP/ unidentified aerial phenomena deflecting a Hellfire missile, captured from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Luna says there is evidence of an advanced technology not created by mankind, and while some cases previously labeled as UAPs were later identified as drones, there remains a portion of evidence that cannot be explained. She notes that multiple governments have examined these phenomena, and emphasizes a national security perspective: as AI and drone technology evolve, it is important to determine whether these are potential adversarial weapons. She argues that the federal government’s denial of access to some members of Congress is alarming and incompatible with a free, transparent society, and she expects the American people to draw their own conclusions after reviewing the evidence. Luna adds that Representative Gates joined the initial codal discussion with her and Representative Tim Burchett, and stated that if viewers have seen the material they have seen, they too would become believers. She then questions whether the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings, asking whether the technology could be something the U.S. possesses that others should not know about, or if it indicates capabilities possessed by a foreign actor that operate in ways that are hard to understand. Based on interviews and testimony she has reviewed, she says there is reason to believe the tech is not created by mankind, though she concedes it is also possible that certain advanced U.S. weapons could be involved. The conversation centers on the accessibility of evidence, the secrecy surrounding it, and the potential implications for national security and public transparency.

There's significant chaos behind the scenes regarding UAP disclosure. Two individuals connected to former Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines revealed a slow drip disclosure agenda originating from her office. The aim was to create the impression that the U.S. government had not seriously investigated UAPs for the past 15 to 20 years, particularly following the Nimitz incident. This plan, spanning 15 to 20 years, consists of several phases. The first phase involves using the James Webb Telescope to release images of artificial structures on distant celestial bodies. Subsequent phases include identifying artificial structures on the Moon and Mars, linking these to archaeological sites on Earth, and ultimately excavating humanoid remains believed to be connected to these anomalies.

Chris Mellon, a former U.S. intelligence official with about twenty years of experience in the Defense Department and on the Senate Intelligence Committee, shared remarks in response to the UAP documentary Age of Disclosure. He references the documentary’s claim that the Air Force maintained a secret program in the 1990s to track UAP near Area 51 and other sensitive military facilities, a claim attributed to General James Clapper, former Director of U.S. Air Force Intelligence and former Director of National Intelligence. Mellon asks several pointed questions about whether that secret Air Force UAP program still exists today, where the data resides, and what the Air Force has learned. He critiques the Air Force for its handling of information requests from Congress. Specifically, he notes that when Congress sought UAP information in the 2020 intelligence authorization bill, the Air Force denied possessing relevant information beyond a handful of recently submitted, non-sensitive reports issued after DoD guidance in 2020 required all military components to report UAP sightings. Mellon contends that the Air Force brass appear to treat Congress with contempt, even if not legally unlawful, and he expresses belief that the secret Air Force UAP program described by Clapper, or a similar program, remains quietly active behind the scenes. He argues this could explain several anomalies in UAP reporting. Mellon highlights incidents to illustrate his concerns: - Air Force F-22s, despite superior sensors, did not report UAP operating in DoD training areas off the East Coast, while Navy F-18s routinely detected and reported UAP on the same ranges. - The USS Princeton radar data from the Nimitz/UAP case allegedly disappeared after U.S. Air Force officers visited the ship. - There are multiple instances where Navy data was reportedly removed by Air Force personnel. - Nimitz deck logs from the period of Princeton UAP tracking in 2004 are missing. - The Air Force has reportedly never reported UAP detected by its strategic radar systems, including solid-state phased array radars with vast range and coverage, even when UAP were detected for days directly in front of these emitters. - No NORAD UAP intercept cases from recent decades were submitted with the 2021 UAP report to Congress, including the well-known UAP incident over the Bush Ranch in Texas, where F-16 pilots reportedly were compelled to sign NDAs by the Air Force. - As recently as the previous year, the Air Force refused to provide NORAD UAP intercept data to DOD’s All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office in Congress. - There are no reports of UAP in space despite a substantial U.S. Air Force space surveillance capability. - The Air Force reportedly seized Navy sonar data obtained after an encounter by a U.S. nuclear submarine with an underwater UAP. Mellon concludes that the Air Force may be withholding UAP data by placing it in an obscure, highly secret “waived special access program” inaccessible to even the chair and ranking members of the intelligence committees, or by invoking authorities such as the Atomic Energy Act to justify concealing data. He suggests the Air Force could claim to be merely the executive agent for the CIA or the National Nuclear Security Agency, creating a potential reporting gap where one agency’s claim of responsibility shifts the burden, allowing the other to deny accountability. Mellon characterizes this dynamic as a possible exploitation of a fissure in the current congressional military and intelligence reporting framework, describing it as a “deep state” mechanism that avoids full congressional visibility into UAP information.

In 2017, a New York Times story exposed a secret government UFO program, leading to congressional inquiries. Instruments report unexplained flight characteristics. Acknowledging UAPs is a recent development. One speaker stated that, based on interviews, the government possesses UAPs and that sources claim crash retrievals have occurred, including nonhuman biologics. Another speaker stated that the American people are being lied to. Nonhuman intelligence exists and has interacted with humanity. The Pentagon and CIA will have to respond. One speaker has feared for their life. When asked about verifying the US government's possession of spaceships of nonhuman intelligence, one speaker stated they would go to jail to reveal what they know.