reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 describes Tim Ballard as having worked with Glenn Beck to build Underground Railroad, portraying Beck as Ballard’s close ally whenever Ballard needed to break a story on child trafficking. When Ballard considered running for Senate and would have likely won with momentum after the Sound of Freedom release, attacks began, and Glenn Beck reportedly “threw him under the bus.” Speaker 0 asserts that Beck pledged allegiance to Israel, is “bought and paid for,” and “Israel's bitch,” claiming Ballard watched a video and realized this. Speaker 1 adds a claim about theSound of Freedom narrative: the child trafficking ring Ballard busted in South America, depicted in the movie, was an Israeli-run sex trafficking ring, run by Israelis. The head of that ring allegedly escaped to Portugal where a judge let him go, and nobody knows where this guy ended up. The speakers state that this is the real story of Sound of Freedom and that “It was an Israeli run sex trafficking ring,” noting that this is not told to the audience and urging others to research it. Speaker 1 then transitions to commentary on Twitter, stating that Twitter is not a free speech platform and is not an open information highway; it is a military application, a propaganda operation, highly bodied, highly artificial, highly synthetic, and manipulated. They acknowledge using it daily but emphasize that not everything is as it seems on the platform. They caution that prominent accounts cannot be taken at face value because campaigns are run, the algorithm is manipulated, and there are bots and unauthentic accounts. The speakers urge awareness of the battlefield on which Twitter is engaged, and advise developing a wary eye toward content, encouraging audiences to examine profiles, retweets, boosts, follows, and networks to understand who is using the same messaging and why.

There is no society anymore. Instead, a transnational security elite is using taxpayer money to carve up the world. To combat this, we must not just petition, but take over. We need to build our own networks of strength and mutual value to challenge the warmongers in our country and others. They have formed an alliance to take money from the United States, NATO countries, Australia, and launder it through Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, and wash that money in people's blood.

There is a transnational security elite using tax money to carve up the world. To combat them, we must not petition but take over. We need to build our own networks to challenge warmongers in the US and other countries who are allied to profit from wars in places like Yemen and Pakistan, where money and lives are at stake.

The speaker argues that when a politician claims support, they are really loyal to a vast international banking dynasty—a Masonic cult with no loyalty to the people whatsoever. This system will offer them gold or lead, and to thrive within it, they must play by its rules. It is not a nation, but the fatherland of a global corporate mafia who rule from behind the veil, the deep state. Their primary jobs are to keep you divided by playing into the left and right paradigm while ensuring that the foreign conquest continues. War is something that they will always agree upon. In other words, you are being used to facilitate and fund their global conquest of other countries. Wars are cleverly marketed and justified by their bought and paid for politicians and their complicit media machine. They fund small terrorist proxy forces which are then attributed to their target nations. Therefore, we have no choice but to invade and install one of our own puppet leaders. And thus now the nation and its riches belong to them. Meanwhile, you’re all distracted, screaming at your own countrymen because they have a different opinion to you so they can ultimately weaken your society and conquer you too. You see divided, are weak, but together, you are strong. The solution is to pull your heads out of your asses, put aside your differences, and realize that you’re all being played, and identify the real threat, the puppet masters who keep you divided.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a network of alleged influence surrounding Tim Ballard, Glenn Beck, and broader geopolitical insinuations, tying activism and media narratives to covert operations and manipulation. Speaker 0 recalls meeting Tim Ballard during a period when he was pursuing controversial legal matters, noting that Glenn Beck helped him build Underground Railroad and was Ballard’s close ally for breaking stories on child trafficking. When Ballard contemplated a dash for political office (senate or congress) and was poised to win after the Sound of Freedom release, Speaker 0 says the attacks against him began. He claims that Glenn Beck subsequently “threw him under the bus,” and quotes his own video response to Ballard’s reaction, arguing that Beck’s loyalty had changed because Beck was “pledging allegiance to Israel,” implying he was bought and paid for and controlled by intelligence agencies. The point is that Beck was not Ballard’s friend, according to Speaker 0, who shows Ballard a video to illustrate this shift. Speaker 1 adds a specific counter-narrative about the Sound of Freedom story. He asserts that the child trafficking ring Tim Ballard exposed in South America, depicted in the film, was actually Israeli-run. He claims the ring was “run by Israelis,” and that its head escaped to Portugal, where a judge released him, after which no traceable location remains. Speaker 1 emphasizes that this is the real story behind Sound of Freedom and asserts that the truth is not told to audiences, urging listeners to research independently to uncover that the ring was Israeli-run. He reiterates the theme that “it’s always them” and that “it always comes back to them.” Speaker 1 shifts to a broader media warning about Twitter, stating that it is not a free speech platform but “a military application,” a propaganda operation that is highly artificial, synthetic, and manipulated. He clarifies that he uses Twitter but urges users to recognize that not everything on the platform is as it seems. He warns that big accounts may be part of campaigns, with paid boosts, manipulated algorithms, bots, and unauthentic accounts. The advisory is to be aware of the battlefield on which users engage, not to abandon the platform, but to be more discerning. He urges readers to develop a wary eye toward others by examining profiles, feeds, retweets, boosts, networks, and who is using the same messaging. Speaker 0 closes by reiterating the pattern of attention, influence, and alleged manipulation that ties these figures and narratives together, suggesting a recurring causal link between entertainment media, political ambition, and covert agendas.

Speaker 0: When I first met Tim Ballard, he was in this wild legal fight, and Glenn Beck helped him build Underground Railroad. They were best friends. Whenever Sam or Tim needed to break a story about child trafficking, Glenn Beck was “his fucking dude.” Then Tim was considering running for Senate or Congress, and with the momentum from Sound of Freedom, he seemed like a shoo-in, and he was set to upset some politician. After those attacks began, Glenn Beck “threw him under the bus,” and Tim told me, “I can’t believe that Glenn would fucking do that to me.” That exact video I showed him—Tim’s friend pledging allegiance to Israel, “he’s bought and paid for,” “not your friend,” “controlled by our intelligence agencies,” “Israel’s bitch.” Tim watched that one video and said, “holy fuck.” Speaker 1: Ryan, you might know this—the child ring Tim Ballard busted up in South America, depicted in Sound of Freedom, was Israeli-run. It was run by Israelis. The head of that ring escaped to Portugal, where a judge basically let him go, and nobody knows where that guy ended up. That’s the real story of Sound of Freedom: an Israeli-run sex-trafficking ring. You’re not told that. Do research and find out about it. That’s who was running the ring. So there’s a lot of interconnection—it's always them, man. It always comes back to them. It seems to always come back to them. It’s like 6,000,000 to one odds. Speaker 0: Every single time. Every single time. It’s strange how that happens. But you wanna wrap it up, Sam? Speaker 1: Yeah. Let’s wrap it up. Listen, everybody. Twitter is not a free speech platform. It is not an open, super highway of information. It is a military application. It is a propaganda operation. It is highly bodied, highly artificial, highly synthetic and manipulated. I’m not saying don’t use it; I use it every day. We absolutely must use it as best we can, but I need everybody to be aware that not everything is as it seems on this platform. You cannot take this platform at face value. Many of the big accounts you see mainstream through your feed aren’t to be taken at face value. They’re running campaigns, being paid, boosted, the algorithm manipulated, with bots and unauthentic accounts. You must be aware of the battlefield you’re engaging on. And I’m not saying you should leave. On the contrary, I want you here, battling. But it’s not what it seems. There’s a lot of smoke and mirrors, shadows, espionage, and spy games on this platform, and you need to be savvy. Don’t develop mistrust of everybody, but develop a wary eye. Look at people’s Twitter profiles, scroll through their feeds, see who they’re retweeting, who they’re boosting, who they’re following, who their networks are, who’s using the same message.

Society no longer exists. A transnational security elite is using taxpayer money to divide the world. To fight back, we must not just protest, but take control. We need to create our own networks to challenge the warmongers who profit from conflicts in countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, and Pakistan, where money is washed in blood.

The speaker discusses a strategy of creating problems in the world and blaming others for them, such as currency runs or government collapses. They claim that the same people funded both sides of the world wars, making money from lending and selling arms. The speaker suggests that wars are used to change society and promote a one-world government, central bank, and electronic cashless society. They also mention the potential for a microchipped population. The speaker criticizes the manipulation of public opinion and the loss of individual power, emphasizing the importance of reclaiming it.

The speaker asserts that social media feeds are the new battleground for manufacturing consent in "5th generation warfare." Even passive consumption, like watching cat videos, contributes to this. The military-industrial complex, owned by entities like BlackRock and Vanguard, profits from keeping people distracted, unhealthy, afraid, and angry. These same institutions own not only weapons manufacturers but also companies across various sectors, including healthcare and utilities. The speaker urges listeners to fight this "war" with words, aiming to "manufacture peace." The speaker believes the upcoming election is critical, suggesting that either the "CIA and the military-industrial complex" will maintain control, or a movement against corruption will succeed. The speaker expresses optimism that this movement is gaining momentum and will win the presidency, reversing the trend of worsening corruption.

The speaker highlights how the public is manipulated by governments and news outlets controlled by the wealthy elite. The military empire exists to protect their capital, not us. The media portrays itself as our savior from terrorism, but it mostly spreads propaganda. Independent news sources like RT and Telesor are crucial for alternative perspectives. The term "fake news" is used to discredit organizations like WikiLeaks that provide factual information. The speaker believes it's wrong to rely solely on mainstream media like MSNBC or Fox. They mention a conspiracy involving Helen Nolan and the White House, emphasizing that disinformation and biased news are common.

We are in a war most people don't even see. But it's not just bombs or bullets. It's information, technology, and control over what you believe. Every day, powerful forces shape the news you read and the thoughts you hold. This is fifth generation warfare. And whether you know it or not, you are already on the battlefield. The choice is yours. Remain unaware or recognize the fight and take a stand.

The speakers discuss a perceived ongoing, multifaceted threat to the United States, tying it to terrorism, political influence, media control, and foreign lobbying. Speaker 0 emphasizes that a hostile group inside the country is attempting to strip Americans of liberties, describing past weather modification and disaster scenarios as intentional acts of terror. They claim a plan to attack Tampa by causing a catastrophic hurricane, which was foiled by doxxing people involved with the operation, including escorts from the US Department of Transportation. They insist that “we are actively being engaged in terrorism and acts of war by a hostile threat that lives among us,” and reject the idea that political changes in Washington reduce these dangers. The speaker asserts that rulers and elites are connected to a web of influence—pharma lobbies, media, and political donors—and contends that many figures in Congress, including APAC-connected individuals, should be exposed by name and faced with accountability. They accuse major pharmaceutical companies and biotech entities of controlling Washington and allege deep, longstanding ties to Israel and global governance structures. They also reference past events to argue that powerful actors have corrupted institutions and policies, including COVID responses, financial bailouts, and foreign influence, and claim that whistleblowing pressure is forcing deals and leadership changes, such as Regeneron’s acquisition moves. Speaker 0 asserts a strategy of direct exposure and intimidation to compel action from elites, insisting, “If you want Trump to have his signals redirected… start dedicating the amount of time that you take for mRNA and what Trump has or has not taken off the market to talking about Duke Country University,” tying local activism to national influence. They claim to know the homes and addresses of various political and corporate figures and urge naming and targeting of these individuals and their families as a means to provoke consequences. They condemn what they describe as a global Jewish-led, “Judeo Bolshevik supremacy” apparatus that they say dominates media, government, and finance, and they contrast this with their view that Western nations should resist such influence. Speaker 1 pushes the idea that fighting the perceived threat requires a similar “warfare” approach, including suppressing media outlets, boycotts, and leveraging “white hats” to prevent infiltration of elections, banking, and networks. They stress that the core battle concerns remaining loyal to a particular political and religious framing, including a discussion of Jesus and Christian theology to frame what they view as moral imperatives in this struggle. The dialogue links religious beliefs to political action, arguing that the enemy uses the “honor of honorable men” and “empathy of empathic people” to wage war, and emphasizes that justice is manipulated to serve said groups. Both speakers critique mainstream politicians and institutions, arguing that current leadership is compromised or controlled by hidden forces. They claim that Trump is not the savior, that many conventional leaders are CIA or part of other hidden systems, and that real change requires public pressure on those they identify as treasonous or genocidal. They dismiss “color commentary” on ideological battles and call for concrete, direct actions by ordinary people to disrupt and deter the actions of the perceived adversaries, while explicitly rejecting violence as a recommended tactic. They advocate exposing names, addresses, and networks of influential figures to create fear of consequences, asserting that such pressure is essential to avert the alleged takeover.

The speaker asserts that social media feeds are the new battleground for manufacturing consent for conflicts, a form of 5th generation warfare. Even passive engagement, like watching cat videos, contributes to this. The military-industrial complex, owned by entities like BlackRock, Vanguard, and major banks, profits from keeping people distracted, unhealthy, afraid, and divided. These institutions also own companies across various sectors, including pharmaceuticals and funeral homes. The speaker urges listeners to fight this "war" with words, to "manufacture peace" by withholding consent from this governance. The speaker believes the movement against corruption is gaining momentum and will win the presidency, reversing decades of worsening corruption.

The speaker highlights how the public is manipulated by governments and news outlets controlled by the wealthy elite. The military empire is focused on protecting their capital, not the people. The media's role is to convince us they are saving us from terrorism, but without independent sources, we receive propaganda. Access to alternative news like RT and Telesor is crucial for diverse perspectives. The term "fake news" is used to discredit organizations like WikiLeaks that provide factual information. Disinformation and biased news are common, with PR firms hired to spin events. The speaker mentions a conspiracy involving Helen Nolan and the White House, emphasizing that the public is often deceived.

The speaker discusses the manipulation of people's fears and the use of the term "military grade." They emphasize that the intention behind the manipulation is not important, but rather the fact that people were manipulated. They mention a British MP who is involved with a military unit called the 77th Brigade, which is engaged in information operations. They also highlight that a Twitter executive is a member of the 77th Brigade, which is why they refer to the operations as "military grade psychological operations." The speaker concludes by stating that people have become scared and are victims of manipulation.

The speaker claims society is engaged in a new "fifth generation" information war where social media feeds are the battleground used to manufacture consent for conflict. Even passive consumption like watching cat videos contributes to this. The military industrial complex, warned about by JFK, is owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and mega banks, who also own each other. These same institutions own Pfizer, General Mills, car companies, water utilities, and even funerary companies, creating aligned incentives to keep people distracted, unhealthy, afraid, and angry. The speaker urges listeners to fight this war with words and manufacture peace instead of consent for war. Another speaker believes the movement against corruption has checkmated the lies and deception and is winning the presidency, reversing progressively worsening corruption. A final speaker sarcastically suggests Kamala Harris is the country's savior, endorsed by the IRS.

The speaker apologizes for the scattered nature of the video and expresses their concern about the current state of affairs, particularly the march towards World War 3. They discuss the movie "Wag the Dog" and its relevance to current events, highlighting the use of fabricated wars to distract from scandals. The speaker mentions the use of atrocity propaganda by the Israeli government on social media and the manipulation of public opinion through deepfake technology. They also touch on the concept of 5th generation warfare, where wars are fought in the minds of everyday citizens. The speaker concludes by urging people to be aware of the manipulation and to cherish their loved ones.

Speaker 0: Funding wars is no joke. Scores and lies fuel the industry. The timeline is filled with ads and distractions. We used to fight for change, but they silenced us with social drugs. We must see beyond the veil and shut down the system. We are the technofarasies, a temporary force against the powerful. Free products come with hidden costs. Good luck to those who challenge us. We hold the power to shape minds. Help us preserve the truth.

The speaker discusses a strategy of creating a problem and blaming someone else for it in order to manipulate public opinion. They claim that both world wars were funded by the same people who wanted to change post-war society. The speaker suggests that we live in a one-party state and describes a vision of a global central bank, electronic currency, world army, and microchipped population. They also mention how certain organizations profit from creating and then solving problems, such as a measles epidemic. The speaker emphasizes the importance of reclaiming our power.

The speaker highlights how the public is manipulated by governments and news outlets controlled by the wealthy elite. The military empire exists to protect their capital, not us. The media portrays themselves as saviors from terrorism, but they mostly spread propaganda. Independent news sources like RT and Telesor are crucial for alternative perspectives. The term "fake news" is used to discredit organizations like WikiLeaks that provide factual information. The speaker believes it's wrong to rely solely on mainstream media like MSNBC or Fox. They mention a conspiracy involving Helen Nolan and the White House, emphasizing that disinformation and biased news are common.

We are in a war most people don't even see. It's not just bombs or bullets. It's information, technology, and control over what you believe. Every day, powerful forces shape the news you read and the thoughts you hold. This is fifth generation warfare. And whether you know it or not, you are already on the battlefield. The choice is yours. Remain unaware or recognize the fight and take a stand.

The speakers discuss how Americans are influenced by “sensational messaging” from Hollywood and national symbols—such as the American dream, “America the beautiful,” and the pledge of allegiance—to view the United States as the freest country and to romanticize America’s government. They argue that, in reality, the system functions like “100% a corporation,” using taxpayer-funded contracts and grants to “prop itself up.” They say the government engages in foreign wars they characterize as “evil,” and that the public pays for these actions. The speakers then describe a cycle in which Hollywood produces action movies that glorify the military. One speaker, a former army officer, says it is especially “disgusting and nefarious” because men and women sign up for “noble causes” but are used for purposes the speaker claims have nothing to do with defending the constitution or protecting American freedoms. They cite “Operation Iraqi Freedom” and “Operation During Freedom” and state it is “almost common knowledge” that there were no weapons of mass destruction and that the invasion had no business, including in light of questions and skepticism about events on 09/11. They argue these actions were disastrous and did not produce more freedom. The speaker contends that bombing “innocent” people and causing “justifiable collateral damage” in foreign countries—while displacing hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, and destroying entire civilizations—does not stop terrorism, but instead enrage people in those areas. They emphasize that while service members sign up believing they are fighting to defend freedoms and security, what they are actually fighting for is different. The other speaker responds that it is “sad” and expresses sympathy for military members. They say many veterans realize the truth while on “that bloody road,” watching friends die or being injured in wars unrelated to defending America’s freedoms or security, and instead connected to protecting the corporate interests of America and making “a small percentage of people very rich.”

The speaker argues that those in power who are described as psychopaths treat war as a celebration, celebrating the destruction of Gaza and boasting of having supplied weapons that targeted children. They claim these leaders manufacture chaos and then present themselves as saviors. Trump is labeled “the president of peace,” but the speaker asserts that this peace is achieved through chaos that Trump himself created. The world is described as a surreal spectacle, continually using the same hyperbolic language. This is said to hypnotize the masses, a point attributed to Peter Phil. The speaker notes Trump performing “little dances,” and the White House positioning him as Superman, a symbol of hope. The show of admiration is contrasted with South Park, which the speaker says does not mock him. The speaker contends Trump mocks the public and their naivety, calling them “the sheep taken from behind.” The Times is said to publish Trump’s victory with his ear in a close-up, representing another humiliation for the public, equating public humiliation to the idea that an AR-15 rifle leaves no trace. Despite these depictions, people allegedly continue to believe because they love hats with new slogans. Ultimately, the speaker frames the situation as a psychological test, designed to determine whether people are ready to kneel before the “digital Antichrist.” The rhetoric links war, media imagery, and political charisma to manipulation of public perception, urging readers to see through the spectacle and question the narratives surrounding leaders and their claims of peace and victory.

The speaker highlights how the public is manipulated by governments and news outlets controlled by the wealthy elite. The military empire is primarily focused on protecting their capital rather than safeguarding the people. The media is portrayed as a tool to convince us that they protect us from terrorism, but it often serves as a source of propaganda. Independent news sources like RT and Telesor are crucial for accessing alternative perspectives. The term "fake news" is used to discredit organizations like WikiLeaks that provide factual information. The speaker emphasizes that conspiracy theories exist, such as the lies told by the White House, but disinformation and biased news are prevalent from various sources.

Sixty years after Kennedy spoke of peace amid war, we face a new conflict: fifth generation warfare and information warfare. Social media has become a battlefield for manufacturing public consent. Even if you think you’re not affected, distractions like cat videos can be just as harmful as disinformation. The military-industrial complex is intertwined with major financial institutions that profit from war and other industries, including healthcare and utilities. This system thrives on keeping people distracted and divided. Instead of consenting to this governance, we should strive to manufacture peace for everyone. The current political movement is gaining momentum against corruption, suggesting a shift towards serving the people. Freedom requires effort, and it's time to challenge the status quo.