TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

First, the mRNA is injected within lipid nanoparticles in your arm. It travels through every organ system, including the heart. There are two papers, one by Baumeyer and colleagues, one by Crosson and colleagues. Crosson found mRNA directly in the heart of deceased mRNA recipients. So we know it reaches the heart. Baumeyer found the spike protein directly in the heart in biopsies of patients with vaccine induced myocarditis. So we know the vaccine mRNA and lipid nanoparticles get into the heart, translate into spike proteins, so your cardiomyocytes begin to produce a toxic non human protein and your own body attacks the heart resulting in inflammation and cardiac scarring including micro scars which are undetectable with imaging. You can only detect it with a microscope, which is very disturbing. And so once you have this scarring, you're going to have cardiac electrical abnormalities, electrical conduction abnormalities, and your heart's not going to beat properly. Then when you go exercise, we found there's two triggers either during exercise or sports when there's exertion or during the morning waking hours of sleep. In these two periods of time, there's a surge in catecholamines including dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. And so during these times when you have this cardiac damage, you have this scarring, that's the trigger you do that leads to this vaccine induced cardiac arrest. And that's why we saw a lot of sudden deaths among athletes back in 2021.

A viewer asks if the proteins from the vaccine enter the bloodstream. The speaker explains that the mRNA blueprint for the protein is given, which is then translated into the protein in the muscle cells. The protein may enter the tissue and possibly trace amounts may enter the blood, but it is not measurable. The reaction occurs in the muscle, the corresponding defense cells, lymph nodes, and minimally in the blood. The speaker concludes that they have reached an agreement on the topic.

A viewer asks if the proteins from the vaccine enter the bloodstream. The speaker explains that the mRNA blueprint for the protein is given, which is then translated into the protein in the muscle cells. The protein may enter the tissue and possibly trace amounts may enter the blood, but it is not measurable. The reaction occurs in the muscle, the corresponding defense cells, lymph nodes, and minimally in the blood. The speaker concludes that they have reached the desired agreement.

"it's modified mRNA, and it's designed not to degrade. And there are studies that show it sticks around the body." "The lipid nanoparticle. Do you realize that it was designed to permeate difficult to permeate barriers? Like the blood brain, like placenta barrier." "Japanese FOIA of the study that was conducted about distribution where in rats, biodistributed all over the body, accumulated in the adrenal glands, in the ovaries." "it's messenger RNA, modified RNA, this encapsulated lipid nanoparticle that distributes all over the body." "when it attaches to a cell, it unloads its mRNA into the cell and turns the cell into a manufacturing cell of a protein that is toxic to it." "Are you aware of that? I mean, just yeah. Yes or no? I mean, do you know that or not? Because I talk to a lot of doctors, don't have a clue."

The speaker confirms that earlier discussions on COVID vaccines mentioned that the nanoparticles remained near the injection site before leaving the body. However, documents released in court revealed that Pfizer knew that lipid nanoparticles not only collected at the injection site but also in various organs such as the adrenal glands, ovaries, liver, kidneys, and brain. The speaker clarifies that the studies showed the presence of a fluorescent label, not necessarily the lipid nanoparticles themselves.

Speaker 0 asks: "Do you think there's evidence that the changes to people to their genetic structure wrought by these vaccines could be passed on to their children?" Speaker 1 responds: "The McCullough Foundation, of which I am the vice president, we just published a person who had cancer of the bladder, which is a very severe cancer, in that tumor, so in the bladder cells that had become dysplastic, that messenger RNA was found in the cancerous cells of this tumor. So it seems to be integrating. Now the question is, is it integrating in a way that is can be passed on to the offspring, or is it so dysfunctional that it's killing the host before it can be passed on? And and I don't know that we yet know that, but remember, the science is the topography of ignorance. I mean, there's a lot about this that is is very, very concerning. There's also a study that this messenger RNA seems to have transcribed into liver cells."

Since the pandemic began, I have aimed to provide objective scientific insights as a publicly funded servant. Regarding concerns about heart inflammation linked to COVID-19 vaccines, I acknowledge the potential connection based on extensive scientific literature and reports from Pfizer to regulatory agencies. Traditional vaccine technology suggests that vaccines remain at the injection site, but this does not apply to mRNA vaccines, which disperse throughout the body. Research shows that only about 25% of the vaccine dose stays in the shoulder. Polyethylene glycol, a component of the vaccine, enhances this distribution, allowing lipid nanoparticles to evade immune cells that would normally capture the antigen for immune activation.

The vaccine's mRNA is identical to the RNA in our cells, which doesn't cause long-term adverse effects. The RNA in the vaccine is degraded within a week and completely gone. The lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine contain four types of fat, two of which are present in our cells and are gone within 24 to 48 hours. None of the vaccine's components remain in the body after days to a week. The mRNA doesn't integrate, affect, change, or mutate the DNA. Adverse events to vaccines mostly occur within the first six weeks, and with 15 million people already vaccinated, only rare anaphylaxis-like reactions have been observed. The chances of experiencing an unusual adverse event are less than 1 in 15 million.

For biodistribution, Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA product in their studies. Instead, they substituted in a luciferase reporter mRNA packaged in the same lipid nanoparticles. This approach allowed them to track where the mRNA traveled in rodents. The studies showed that following intramuscular injection, most of the mRNA remained at the site of injection, but there was also notable levels detected in the liver. Despite the limitations of this approach, which can underestimate low level or transient distributions to other tissues, it nevertheless showed that the vaccine components do not remain confined to the injection site. Next slide. For Moderna, no dedicated biodistribution study was performed with the COVID mRNA itself. Instead, data was provided from a surrogate product, a CMV mRNA, mRNA-sixteen 47, which used the same lipid nanoparticle formulation. In their rat study, after intramuscular injections, high levels of the mRNA were detected at the injection site, but also in multiple organs such as the draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver. Lower levels were also found across a wide range of tissues, including the heart, lungs, testes, and brain. Importantly, this study clearly showed that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Next slide. Consistent with what is seen in animal studies, the vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected in humans across multiple tissues, including blood, lymph nodes, the heart, and even the brain. These findings make it clear that the mRNA does not remain confined to the injection site. Importantly, persistence has been documented well beyond the initial hours or days, lasting weeks in some tissues, and in certain studies detectable for many months. Next slide. To summarize the biodistribution data, it's important to note that neither Moderna nor Pfizer used their actual commercial mRNA vaccine products in the preclinical biodistribution studies. Instead, they relied on surrogate construct packaged in same or similar lipid nanoparticles. Second, the results of those studies show that the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles were not confined to the injection site. Systemic distribution was observed with evidence that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Consistent with these findings, studies in humans have confirmed that vaccine mRNA can be detected in multiple tissues, including lymph nodes, the heart, the central nervous system, and blood. Finally, persistence is not just short term. In some reports, mRNA has been detected for weeks to months, and in certain cases as long as seven zero six days post vaccination. Taken together, these data highlight that biodistribution is broad and persistence is longer than initially expected, raising important questions and concerns for ongoing research and safety monitoring.

The vaccine contains fatty acids and messenger RNA encased in fatty acid nanoparticles for protection. Once injected, the components are taken up by cells and eventually disintegrate. Some misinformation and fears about the vaccine's contents exist, but it is important to communicate clearly about its temporary nature and immune response activation. Additionally, the vaccine has been found in various tissues throughout the body, contrary to initial beliefs about its localized effects and degradation timeline.

"Now, when these genes, packages, enter the cells, then the cells will start making this damn virus protein which is called the spike." "This is going to happen to any mRNA or gene based vaccine." "Those packages are going to cause your cells in the blood vessels to create this protein and this protein is going to be a foreign non self protein that is going to be recognised by any antibodies that you have and these antibodies are going to be there after the first injection." "If any of these vessels is clogged because of a thrombus or because it's injured, the cells that are being supplied by oxygen are going to die." "So if these tiny vessels in the brain or the heart are damaged, you are damaged for life. You will never be the same again."

Speaker 0 lays out a numerical comparison between vaccine versus infection to determine which creates more spike proteins, according to the source material. First, the infection scenario. The unit counted is the virion (one complete virus particle). At the peak of infection, the body could be fighting off somewhere between one to 100,000,000,000 virions. Each virion has spike proteins on its surface, counted as between twenty five and fifty spikes per virion. The calculation multiplies the range of virions by the spikes per virion, giving a peak infection spike protein load of two to 10,000,000,000,000 spike proteins. Next, the vaccination scenario. The math starts with modified messenger RNA (modRNA) molecules in a vaccine dose. A single vaccine dose contains somewhere between 14 to 42,000,000,000,000 modRNA molecules. Each of these trillions of modRNA molecules can produce multiple spike proteins, ranging from 10 to 1,000 each. When the numbers are multiplied, the source calculates a potential total of up to 100,000,000,000,000,000 spike proteins (up to 10^17, i.e., up to one hundred quadrillion). Speaker 0 then contrasts the two scenarios. In a side-by-side view, the initial particles are billions of virions versus trillions of modRNA molecules. The timing differs as well: a natural infection builds up over about a week, whereas the vaccine dose is delivered all at once, in just a few seconds. The final totals are two to 10,000,000,000,000 spikes from infection versus a potential of up to one hundred quadrillion from vaccination. Visually, this difference is stark, with the infection spike protein bar being far smaller than the vaccine spike protein bar, illustrating an order-of-magnitude difference. The discussion then moves to the distribution and persistence of spike proteins. The source describes the virus's spread as more localized or comparatively narrow, while vaccine components are said to travel throughout the entire body, with accumulation in areas including major organs like the heart and the brain, and the potential to cross barriers such as the blood-brain barrier and the placental barrier. Regarding duration, spike mRNA was reportedly detected in cerebral arteries after seventeen months, and some vaccinated individuals were reportedly still spike positive for up to sixteen hundred days. The source concludes, “Your spike load is orders of magnitude higher via injection.” Speaker 0 notes that the numbers show trillions versus quadrillions and emphasizes the presented math and its implications as the core of the comparison, while acknowledging the source’s look at spike proteins’ distribution and persistence.

When was the last time you saw a strand of DNA? It's the genetic code in almost every cell, defining who you are. Recently, there's been a rumor that COVID-19 vaccines alter your DNA. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use messenger RNA (mRNA) technology. After injection, the vaccine instructs your cells to prepare for an incoming virus, prompting your immune system to create antibodies. Importantly, the vaccine never enters the nucleus where your DNA resides, and once your cells use the vaccine, they destroy it. While these vaccines are new, mRNA technology has been in development for over a decade. So, if you're concerned about the vaccine changing your DNA, there's no need to worry. You remain unchanged.

Taixin Media from China asks about concerns regarding the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines. Richard acknowledges that mRNA vaccines have only been administered for a limited time, but emphasizes that the number of people who have received the vaccine greatly outweighs the reported side effects. He believes that the limited side effects make long-term concerns less significant. Another participant adds that mRNA vaccines cannot integrate into DNA, ensuring safety. The main adverse effect observed is mild myocarditis or pericarditis, primarily affecting young males, but it typically resolves without long-term consequences.

The speaker addresses concerns about the long-term negative impact of the vaccine. They explain that the RNA in the vaccine is identical to the RNA in our cells, which does not cause long-term adverse events. The RNA is quickly degraded and eliminated from the body. The lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine also disappear within 24 to 48 hours. The speaker emphasizes that none of the vaccine components remain in the body after a week. They debunk the myth that the mRNA integrates or mutates DNA, stating that it has no effect on DNA. They mention that 90% of adverse events to vaccines occur within the first 6 weeks, and so far, no unusual adverse events have been observed among the 15 million people who have received the vaccine. The only serious adverse reaction is anaphylaxis, which occurs in about 1 in 100,000 people. The speaker concludes by highlighting the extremely low odds of experiencing an adverse event from the vaccine.

The speakers discuss a broad denial about vaccine injuries and the idea that, despite evidence, the medical establishment and political figures push the narrative that vaccines are safe and effective. They claim that many people who are vaccinated want to move on and avoid acknowledging serious side effects, including turbo cancers, undetected myocarditis, and neurological issues, and that autoimmune disease is being attributed to other causes. They argue that the medical establishment, federal health agencies, and some members of Congress who produce supportive content, such as segments like Steve Colbert’s, advocate for taking the shot. They question how many people were killed or died from the shot, asserting that Bayer’s data shows “close[ly]” to thirty-nine thousand worldwide, and that if only ten percent are reported, the true number would be in the hundreds of thousands. They claim there are millions of adverse events, but that this is denied and covered up. The speakers contend that the shot was not a real vaccine. They describe it as gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine. They explain a sequence in which a vaccine is typically an attenuated or killed virus that requires adjuvants like aluminum or mercury to stimulate the immune system, because the attenuated or killed virus may not work well on its own. In contrast, they say this shot is mRNA, which is modified so it does not degrade. They describe how it is put into a lipid nanoparticle designed to permeate barriers like the blood-brain barrier, and they assert it would never stay in the arm, distributing all over the body. They claim the lipid nanoparticle allows the mRNA to enter cells, hijack cellular structures, and cause the cells to express spike protein, which the body then attacks as foreign. When asked who is responsible, they reference a “doctor Frankenstein” figure and name Francis Collins, head of the NIH, and Anthony Fauci as possible figures in question. The response indicates that while they consider all of them criminally liable, they would say it is primarily Fauci, with acknowledgment that people like Collins are implicated as well.

A viewer asks if the proteins from the vaccine enter the bloodstream. The speaker explains that the mRNA blueprint for the protein is given, which is then translated into the protein in the muscle cells. The protein may enter the tissue and possibly trace amounts may enter the blood, but it is not measurable. The reaction occurs in the muscle, the corresponding defense cells, lymph nodes, and minimally in the blood. The speaker concludes that they have reached an agreement on the topic.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to explain why the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis. Speaker 1 mentions rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with vaccination but does not provide a clear explanation. Speaker 0 insists on understanding the mechanism and questions why the vaccine is considered safe without addressing the risks. Speaker 2 intervenes, suggesting that Speaker 1 will address the question later. Speaker 1 talks about the benefit-risk ratio and the global recommendation of health authorities. Speaker 0 reiterates the question, to which Speaker 1 agrees to provide a response later. Speaker 2 confirms this agreement.

"So here we see the syringe needle going in and the lipid nanoparticles coming out." "Probably three to 6,000 per injection." "These are completely new to the human body, and they circulate around in the blood." "They're supposed to stay in the deltoid muscle, but they don't." "They circulate everywhere around the body." "Then when they come to a cell, they'll go inside the cell, this process called endocytosis." "Any contaminating DNA will be carried very, very efficiently by the lipid nanoparticles into cells, coming into contact with the walls of the vascular endothelium, the lining of the blood vessels." "If the lipid nanoparticles are 80 nanometers each, it would be 87 of them to fit across the diameter of a red blood cell." "So 5,000,000,000 of these red blood cells in one milliliter of blood, and yet this is the size of the lipid nanoparticles." "Until these problems are resolved there should be a moratorium on mRNA vaccines." "In my view let me know what you think."

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss vaccines and vaccine technology. Speaker 0 begins by saying, “He injected billions of people with an experimental it wasn't a bloody just no. It wasn't,” expressing that the vaccine was experimental and not straightforward. Speaker 1 counters briefly with, “It was no one isn't,” then suggests uncertainty about the claim. Speaker 0 adds that “Yes. It is. It's Well, it doesn't have a 100%,” indicating skepticism about a perfect success rate. Speaker 1 asks, “You think it's a definition of all point of is to give your body a,” challenging the stated purpose of the vaccine in terms of its aim to train the immune system. Speaker 0 then states, “protein train on. The immune system works. Technology,” implying that the vaccine trains the immune system and works as a technology. Speaker 1 responds that “Who cares if it's not the same? There's plenty there's,” implying there are multiple vaccines or approaches enough to matter, suggesting diversity in types. Speaker 0 replies, “different so types that they didn't have to contend with the fact that it wasn't the same technology.” Speaker 1 acknowledges that “There are different types of,” and that “There are different technologies. Fine. The mRNA is a type of vaccine.” Speaker 0 firmly rejects that, saying, “Now this is No. It was,” indicating a disagreement about the classification. Speaker 1 clarifies that “like this, and now it's like this,” implying a progression from one form to another. Speaker 0 insists, “No. No. No. It was like this, and now it's like this. The m n r mRNA technology was a radical, qualitative leap forward in technology.” He asserts that mRNA technology represents a significant advancement compared to what existed before. Speaker 1 suggests naming it differently or acknowledging changes, but Speaker 0 continues that “You can call it if you want to, but it bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that.” The final point is that “The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology.”

There's new evidence suggesting shedding might be real. The mRNA vaccines were called vaccines instead of gene therapy so they wouldn't have to test for shedding on non-injected people. We're giving your body the code to make the virus' spike protein, creating immunity. The spike protein alone won't kill you, but your body learns to eliminate it. If you later get COVID, your body will recognize and attack the spike protein. However, there's no guarantee your body stops producing the spike protein. Your cells, once healthy, now make spike proteins, which your immune system attacks, even if it's your own cells. The mRNA in the vaccines is stabilized to last longer and is coated in lipid nanoparticles to protect it and cross the blood-brain barrier.

The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine delivers instructions for creating spike proteins, which then triggers an immune response. The vaccine and spike protein are said to break down and disappear within days, leaving no trace and not affecting DNA. The vaccine is taken up at the injection site and quickly metabolized. However, an Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration document indicates the vaccine distributes throughout the body, including adipose tissue, adrenal glands, and the brain. There was allegedly no data on how quickly the mRNA degrades. Research indicates vaccine mRNA can be detected up to 14-15 days post-vaccination in some individuals. A rare post-vaccination syndrome (PVS) is associated with chronic conditions and elevated spike protein levels up to 709 days post-vaccination, even without detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection. One hypothesis suggests that the mRNA may reverse transcribe and integrate into DNA, causing continuous spike protein production and potentially leading to T cell exhaustion. The possibility of germline transfer and long-term health consequences is raised.

The mRNA COVID vaccine gives your body instructions to create copies of spike proteins. As soon as the spike protein is made, the vaccine breaks down and disappears from your body, usually within a matter of days or even hours. The vaccine is administered into your arm muscle, where it's quickly metabolized. The vaccine is taken up at the injection site and does not diffuse throughout the body. Your cells destroy the vaccine and recycle its components. Your immune system recognizes the spike proteins and learns how to fight the virus, without you actually getting sick. After a few days, all the mRNA from the vaccine is gone and the spike proteins that your cells produced are destroyed by your immune system. The only thing that remains is the memory of how to fight COVID-19, so your immune system is ready if it encounters the virus again. There is nothing to fear from the vaccine.

A viewer asks if the proteins from the vaccine enter the bloodstream. The speaker explains that the mRNA blueprint for the protein is given, which is then translated into the protein in the muscle cells. The protein may enter the tissue and possibly trace amounts may enter the blood, but it is not measurable. The reaction occurs in the muscle, the corresponding defense cells, lymph nodes, and minimally in the blood. The speaker concludes that they have reached an agreement on the topic.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to explain the process of how the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis. Speaker 1 mentions rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with vaccination. Speaker 0 insists on an explanation of the mechanism, but Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer. Speaker 1 emphasizes that all medicines have benefits and side effects and refers to the benefit-risk ratio. Speaker 0 continues to press for an explanation of the biochemical pathway, but Speaker 1 agrees to provide a response later. The transcript ends with Speaker 2 confirming Speaker 1's agreement to give a further response.