reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The president has been trying to provoke violence here, right here, in the black communities and in the brown communities, having ICE kidnap our neighbors, having black having the black community be harassed and profiled and want, want a response. We say, hell no. We won't go. One that respects rights to build trust and keep our communities truly safe and that is fascism free. Free is not a road map to safety. It is a burial. Data and reports from many credible organizations show patterns. Black people are more likely to be stopped, searched, questioned, arrested, and harmed encounters with the law. When we add the president of federal agents or the national guard to daily life in these neighborhoods, the burden can multiply. Not by making harm more rare, but making it more visible and more likely to escalate.

We will fight back. Shut down the city. We are at war. Anytime a person can pay $250,000,000 into a campaign and be given full access to the Department of Treasury of the United States of America, we are at war.

During a heated exchange, Speaker 0 claims he spoke with over 300,000 real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evince the Civil War or the Confederacy and to label law enforcement as a sickness, noting he has over a 150 sworn police officers on his detail. He asks what the other would say to these people and whether he would have CPD detail stand down if he or his wife Stacy were attacked. The other participant responds that numbers are increasing and brushes off the decline, saying, 'it's going up... check out your comments.' They discuss a critique, calling the addiction on jails and incarceration and militarism an evil, citing Doctor King. The conversation shifts to immigration, alleging incident: 'Illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman... and raped her,' and asks if ICE should deport that individual and the rapist, concluding, 'That's the answer... for real Chicagoans.'

AOC is doing webinars that give advice to undocumented immigrants about how to avoid being caught and how to stay in the United States, which may be gaming the system. I've contacted the Deputy Attorney General to see if this is obstructing law enforcement. I need the DOJ to determine if a line has been crossed. In my opinion, this is an impediment. We need advice on how to move forward. If necessary, we will take every federal dollar out of the city. This is a matter of public and community safety. Releasing dangerous people endangers the public, our officers, and even undocumented immigrants. If sanctuary cities won't act to make their communities safer, President Trump will.

We have every obligation to defend our people, community, and families by any means necessary. While not wanting to be violent, we are not nonviolent; we believe in self-defense. If someone comes at me or my family, I will do everything in my power, legal or not, to defend them. There are over 200 people detained in a dungeon in the basement, with no bathrooms, showers, enough food or water, and children are also being held there. This is a human rights violation. We have to liberate those people and fight for them. They are being held around the corner, and we are going to move down there so they can hear and see us and know they are not alone.

Take even more dramatic ash action if this administration continues to escalate. What exactly does that mean from a city perspective? Everything. Meaning? Everything. Whatever is necessary to ensure that we're protecting people. Look, I've already signed. This is the third executive order. The most sweeping executive orders from any executive office pushing back against this administration. We are looking at every single way in which we can protect people. And as the coming days come forward, there are many ideas that have already been placed, in in our collective circle, and I'm giving serious considerations around another potential executive order later this week. Can you give an example?

We appreciate the technical support and work authorization from the federal government. Without significant investment, not just Chicago but the entire country will struggle to maintain this mission. However, the state of Texas is not helping the cause. While we acknowledge the challenges at the border and the need for immigration reform and a pathway to citizenship, sending buses all over Illinois and the country is reckless and dangerous.

"We've already sued New York." "We've already sued Illinois." "If they don't comply, we're going to sue them." "We're gonna take away your federal funding." "You're going to have to comply." "We're gonna send in law enforcement." "Our National Guard are ready to go." "They have been working hand in hand with our park services here in DC." "The metro police are loving it." "They can actually now arrest people." "They have federal officers with them." "They're buddied up, and they are making arrests, keeping Americans safe and keeping our capital safe." "All of our museums are free." "Families deserve to be able to go there." "They feel safe now to walk their own neighborhood where they live because of what our great great men and women in law enforcement are doing at the directive of the president."

"They don't want Donald Trump to come in there with the National Guard because if they clean up the crime, Chicago will lose 800,000,800 million dollars in federal funding for crime programs." "It's a 100% true." "And black people are falling for it." "These liberal protesters are falling for it." "They don't even live in Chicago." "And so they're dependent on Donald Trump." "It's one big racket, bro, and it's not fair to the black people and the community members and the people that live, work, and play and have to deal with this nonsense on a regular basis." "It's so messed up, bro." "Money. I say this about everybody. Body. Follow the money. The money is gonna lead you to the reasons why."

Speaker 0: All your great videos from Air Force One. But tell the American people, from your perspective, you got a view none of us did, what is it that we didn't get to see about that trip that you got to experience when it relates to president Trump? Speaker 1: It's actually very surreal because a lot of people said that president Trump couldn't get this done. Couldn't get it done. MAGA knew deep down that if anybody could get this deal done with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Marco Rubio and that great team that it would be president Trump. And we're on the plane going out. We all knew this was a historical moment. There was a great sense of pride on the plane, know, checking in on the president up in his office. You know, just he does so much reading and consuming of information. He knew how real the moment was too. Then when we entered out into the Middle East and you had the f sixteens escorting the plane in, which has happened before, but it was just it was a great feeling that the president of The United States, the leader of the free world, Donald j Trump, was there on a mission that he wanted to complete, you know, that he talked about and talked about and talked about. And everybody said, no. No. No. And he ended the war. And it it's absolutely incredible. You know, millions of lives saved amongst all these wars being ended. 20 hostages coming home. Just think about it. If if president Trump was not in office, this would still be going on. Speaker 0: It was historic for sure. There's no doubt about it. You were announced last weekend as the head of PPO, presidential personnel. So for the American people, maybe give them a sense of what this job actually entails, what you do, and why it is so important to the American people, so important to national security, and really the future of the country. Speaker 1: It it was an honor for the president to ask me to take this, additional job on. PPO is responsible, for vetting, interviewing, and bringing in candidates, political appointees to all of these agencies throughout the government. And something that we really wanna keep an eye on, which has been done, is, you know, bringing people with the values of the president that want to complete his agenda, making America great again, America first policies. I work very closely with all of the cabinet members, or I will be working very closely. So the communication you have with the cabinet members is very important in staffing up their agencies with political appointees. PPO also oversees ambassador appointments all around the world. So we have those to fulfill. We're also responsible for US Marshals and fulfilling those obligations all around the country. Work very closely with the DOJ on that front. So as I said, I'm learning every day that passes. I'm a quick learner, and I've hit the ground running. Speaker 0: As it relates to The Middle East, since we just talked about that, obviously, people are really excited about what happened there, and they wanna see more forward progress. Do you come in on that? What is it that you're gonna be able to do from this office to help implement phase two? Speaker 1: It's a great question and and things that actually came up yesterday in a couple of meetings. So that's my learning process. But we will need to fulfill, special envoys that are that are gonna be out there as well as oversight of the rebuilding of Gaza, and there'll be commissions that will be created in which we'll assist in. And with that, I would work with secretary of state Marco Rubio, Steve Witkoff, who is just such a great, great, great man. Love the guy. As well as, you know, Jared is very involved in getting this done as well. So it's really a team effort, and I'm willing to put forth the office with anything we can assist with in in getting the job done and fulfilling obligations out there to to support their mission in in completing each phase. Speaker 0: Well, something else that this administration has been very successful at doing is a crime crackdown. What else are you involved with from PPO that can help, you know, facilitate more of this crime crackdown all across the country? I imagine you guys have a role in that too. Speaker 1: We do. We do with fulfilling judgeships, within districts. US marshals, like I mentioned earlier, the US marshals are absolutely, incredible in what they do. And it's just getting leadership in each district, within each community, county, and state, throughout the country. So we'll fulfill all of that. And we'll we'll work with all entities. It is a team effort, and you see it every day. It's an atmosphere of where everybody wants to work together. I tell you behind the scenes in these cabinet meetings and in these meetings that take place in the Oval, everybody's on the same page marching in unison to deliver the president's, you know, agenda and and his goals in making Washington DC safe again, in making Memphis safe again, Chicago. How can these guys like Chicago how could they not want to make Chicago safe again? I'll understand it for the life of me. How these people do not want to work with this administration. And I'm talking Pritzker, and I'm talking Newsome. How and why? Speaker 0: Yeah. And it's it's sad because it's hurting the residents of their cities and states. So, Dan, as we sit here in Washington DC right now, the government is still shut down. What do you make of the priorities of the Democrat party? Speaker 1: It makes absolutely zero sense. There are more issues and problems in in this world, and they decide to fight to give illegal immigrants health insurance, and they're keeping the entire government closed down. And and I joke and I say, what? The government's closed down? For the past two weeks, this White House and other agencies were getting things done. We're marching forward. Look what just happened in The Middle East. You wouldn't even known the government was closed down. To close down the government, they are losing on this, the likes of which I was gonna say they've never lost before, but they've lost a lot before. So, they're just not on message. They don't know what they're doing. Zero leadership. Zero leadership. I I think they're truly embarrassing themselves. Absolutely embarrassing themselves. Speaker 0: I know we talked very early on in this administration about the difference between president Trump the first term, because you were here for the entirety of that, and the second term. How is he day to day now? Where do you see him overall? And I feel like the sky's the limit for this president and this administration. Speaker 1: The differences are absolutely incredible. We're not being attacked every day or investigated every day. The head games they played, they wanted to silence us. They ultimately wanted to put us all away for life. Then when he announced for the presidency, and we went full steam ahead. We worked in courtrooms behind the scenes. We're putting out truth social posts. We're campaigning. We're turning his press conferences in at the conclusion of a court hearing. Butler, Pennsylvania, we talked about last time, changed everything. Literally changed everything. It was from that point forward where I knew that he would be the forty seventh president of The United States. And then he just brought on a great team of people when we won the presidency. I mean, it is all surreal. I don't have time to even sit back and think about it and think about what we've been through and what we've done and what we've achieved. There will never be a president Trump ever, ever, ever again. He's changing history for the better. He's fighting every day for your children, your grandchildren, your great grandchildren, my family. That's why I do what I do. We could go out tomorrow and make millions of dollars. I I instead take a government salary to fight for the American people every day, and that's everybody in this administration. All for president Trump because they adore and they love the guy, and they love the American people. They're patriots, And that's why we're here. We're on a mission. We're on a mission to deliver for everybody out there. And we're gonna continue this mission. And we're gonna fight hard each and every day no matter what hit pieces come our way, no matter who tries to take us down, we're gonna fight, fight, fight.

Speaker 0 opened by saying that over the last week he has interacted with over 300,000 plus real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evoke the Civil War or the Confederacy, to say that law enforcement is a sickness, while the other person has over 150 sworn CPD officers on his detail. He asked what the other person would say to those people and whether he would ask his 150 sworn officers to stand down if he and his wife Stacy are ever attacked, shot at, or rammed with a protester’s vehicle. Speaker 1 responded with sarcasm about the large number, joking that the interactions had “gone down to 300,000,” and claimed he had checked the other person’s comments. He asserted that the addiction on jails and incarceration and the addiction of militarism is evil, referencing Doctor King, and said it is incumbent to ensure that “the real Chicagoans” or the real people of America receive attention, suggesting we should spend billions of dollars overseas on the people in Chicago instead. Speaker 0 pushed back, saying that the real Chicagoans he talks to, mostly Black and Brown, feel that the other person does not distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens, and that he is siding with illegal aliens over communities. He asserted that a recent incident involved “an illegal alien from Nicaragua” who grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. He asked whether, if that had been the other person’s wife, Stacy, he would want ICE to deport that illegal alien, and asked for a yes or no answer. Speaker 1 pressed to get a direct answer, asking for a response “as a man, not as mayor,” and repeated the question about whether ICE should deport the rapist. Speaker 0 reiterated his question and stated that the answer for real Chicagoans is the deportation of the rapist, and that was the “answer for real Chicagoans.” Speaker 1 then apologized for being late, blaming traffic, and the other person quipped about the traffic, noting, “You’re not blaming me for the traffic, are you?” and said he had been watching.

"The president has been trying to provoke violence here, right here, in the black communities and in the brown communities, having ICE kidnap our neighbors, having black having the black community be harassed and profiled and want, want a response. We say, hell no. We won't go." "Today, we get today today, we gather to speak plainly about policy path that sounds strong, but in truth, it weakens the very safety we see." "Black people are more likely to be stopped, searched, questioned, arrested, and harmed encounters with the law." "When we add the president of federal agents or the national guard to daily life in these neighborhoods, the burden can multiply." "We're fighting for freedom and safety for all people."

The speakers discuss explicit reward figures tied to harming federal law enforcement personnel and describe a rising level of danger for officers in Chicago. They begin by listing bounties: $5 to $10 for kidnapping of ICE agents or Customs and Border Patrol agents, non-lethal assaults, and $50,000 for the assassination of high-ranking officials. Greg Movino, who works in Chicago, says he has personally experienced a bounty placed on his head, illustrating the immediacy of the threat. The panel emphasizes that there are now “$50,000 bounties on the heads of federal law enforcement officers” and that criminals are involved in ramming vehicles and bringing guns to protests. They insist this is not ordinary street crime, but attacks against federal law enforcement, including assaults on border patrol agents, ICE officers, and allied agencies, occurring daily and often multiple times per day. They warn that the lethality of these assaults is increasing, highlighting the growing danger faced by officers enforcing the rule of law. In response to these threats, the speakers discuss measures and leadership strategies. They note that “there's power in numbers” and “safety in numbers,” suggesting collective protection as part of the response. They reference actions at the national level: Secretary Noem reportedly hardening ICE facilities since the terror attack in Dallas, and President Trump having called in the National Guard, viewing these steps as indicative of strong leadership during the crisis. The speakers describe the situation as a coordinated, highly organized “war on our law enforcement on the streets of Chicago,” implying a systematic campaign by adversaries. A key point is the claim that foreign terrorist networks are targeting law enforcement, using a tiered system of bounties to pursue officers. The threats are described as extending beyond direct attacks to include doxxing family members, kidnapping, and even murder. The language frames these actions as deliberate tactics by hostile groups to destabilize and intimidate those enforcing the law, underscoring the perceived severity and organization behind the threats as testified by the speakers.

Let's be clear, the sanctuary city mayors are here with legal counsel. Things have changed since the election. We've exposed how quickly the border could be secured if the executive branch enforced the law. Now, cities are paying attention and lawyering up. These mayors' policies, like those of the previous president, have real consequences. I have with me a family who lost their son to an illegal immigrant. You mayors have a responsibility to everyone. You cooperate with other law enforcement agencies, but not ICE, which removes criminal illegals. America is tired of this betrayal. Some of you said you'd go to jail. We might take you up on that. People are separated from their children all the time when they commit felonies, but at least they get to come home. This young man will never come home, and it never should have happened. We're entering a new era of enforcing our laws.

I really am honored that the National Guard has done such an incredible job working with the police. And we haven't had to bring in the regular military, which we're willing to do. After we do this, we'll go to another location, and we'll make it safe also. We're gonna make our country very safe. Chicago is a mess. You have an incompetent mayor, grossly incompetent. And we'll straighten that one out probably next. And it won't even be tough. And the people in Chicago, mister vice president, are screaming for us to come. They are. They're wearing red hats just like this one. African American ladies, beautiful ladies are saying, please, president Trump, come to Chicago. Please. I did great with the black vote, as you know, and they want something to happen. So I think Chicago will be our next, and then we'll help with New York.

The transcript presents a highly charged, partisan monologue-style coverage of urban unrest, immigration enforcement, and political rhetoric. It centers on claims about Portland, Chicago, and national figures, presenting multiple viewpoints and sensationalized language. Key points include: - In Portland, Kristi Noem, described as the secretary of homeland security, allegedly visited “Rip City,” inspected Antifa’s activities, and interacted with immigration enforcement, with claims that ICE is removing individuals described as fentanyl traffickers, murder suspects, sex predators, and pedophiles in Oregon. The narration asserts that the city’s law enforcement and political leadership are hostile to ICE, while depicting protesters as rioters with reporters filming to amplify chaos. The segment alleges a dissension within Antifa and portrays the police as anxious about media coverage and influencers at the riots. - Chief Bob Day of Portland is depicted as both a police chief and a DEI consultant who allegedly spent time with a DEI nonprofit called the Red Door Project, whose mission is described as “Reimagine policing.” The narrative contends Day has coached Antifa in avoiding arrest and blames “the selfie-stick guy” at riots for problems, while suggesting Day’s actions reflect a broader city stance toward ICE and immigration enforcement. - The text quotes various protesters and media commentators, including assertions that mainstream outlets avoid fair coverage of riots, while protesters are accused of using videographers to manufacture impressions of chaos. There are criticisms of media bias and claims that left-leaning voices minimize violence or downplay confrontations with police. - In Chicago, the account claims Mayor Johnson created “no ICE zones” after incidents in which Antifa allegedly rammed agents with cars, leading to a stand-down order and prosecutions that were described as undermined by locally connected judges. A University of Chicago sociology professor involved in a case is noted, with the narrative highlighting a broader claim that advocates for immigration enforcement face danger and doxing on social platforms. - The transcript links these events to a national narrative: opposition figures argue for stronger police funding and training, assert that the left pressures businesses not to cooperate with ICE, and claim that criminals and illegal crossings have been down, with references to national guard deployments in Chicago and to immigration enforcement as a political instrument in elections. - The piece ties in multiple sensational claims about specific individuals’ loyalties, alleged threats, and contemplated political moves, including overtones about Nazi-era comparisons, and allegations that figures like Trump could deploy troops to influence voting or polling-place security. It also references internal political arguments, apologies from politicians for past statements, and debates over media portrayal and accountability. - Throughout, the speakers attribute intentions and motives to political actors (Democrats, Republicans) and to various law enforcement and media figures, repeating the refrain that liberal or left-leaning factions intentionally hinder immigration enforcement, public safety, and election integrity. The overall arc presents a narrative of conflict between immigration enforcement, local policing, media representation, and political power, with emphasis on clashes in Portland and Chicago, critiques of City leadership and media, and calls for heightened enforcement and political repercussions.

"We have 500,000 children who had sponsors in this country that we can't find." "We can't find them." "We don't know if they're doing child labor." "We don't know if they're doing sex crimes." "We don't know if they're being exploited." "500,000 children." "There's a level of hypocrisy that everyone that states they wanna protect everyone but innocent individuals who are victims of crimes and children." "I wanna and protect children and innocent people that are victims of crime." "And those who don't understand that, it's not up to me to try to convince them." "I know what my job is, my goal is, and I was clear of that while running and when I became mayor." "Safety means everything to me." "500,000 children, we don't know where they are right now in this country."

I'm proud to be part of this effort. We've taken significant action against sanctuary cities, halting federal funding and filing lawsuits against Chicago and Illinois for their policies. Sanctuary cities prioritize illegal aliens over the safety of their citizens and law enforcement. We are holding city and state leaders accountable, including the mayor and governor. If they don't comply with federal law, they will face consequences. What about those who tipped off the trend day, Arawak?

I believe the United States is in a type of civil war. By that, I mean we have irreconcilable differences. Each side is willing to fight for the outcomes that they want. In that kind of environment, the question becomes, how will the legal system function? Will it stand in the way of the fight, or will the fight itself become more important than anything else? That's the type of situation we're currently facing.

Speaker 1 stated they will do everything in their power to protect Seattle residents from anyone who comes to the city with the intention to hurt them or inhibit their first amendment rights. They believe they will probably go to jail and be in prison because the current administration has threatened to jail politicians and has done so.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is threatening to arrest ICE agents if they try to deport undocumented migrants. He emphasizes his commitment to protect the people of Chicago from what he sees as threats from the current administration. Johnson argues that targeting undocumented individuals undermines public accommodations and poses a risk to civility and democracy. He asserts that these individuals are part of the community and vows to take action to safeguard them.

The speakers believe the influx of tens of thousands of people daily is meant to replace them. They advocate for Trump in 2024 as the only one who will stop it and partner with America. They demand these people be sent back, warning of violent explosions if not. They assert the mayor and governor don't care, so they must "go red," linking with America to address this. They are "coming" for electoral officials who didn't step up and those who supported this, aiming to turn Chicago red by November. They claim American citizens of African American descent built Chicago and are being disrespected by the Biden regime, the "uni party," and "globalists" forcing "illegal alien invaders" into a resource-lacking city. They say "progressive whites" are too "godless" to house them in their own neighborhoods. They aim to "flip America red" and send a message to the Democratic Party from black America and black Chicago.

If anyone tries to forcibly remove these women and children, there will be protests from American citizens who will stand to protect them. While there may be concerns about potential terrorists among them, it's difficult to identify who they are. The reality is that many people are committed to preventing children from being taken from shelters. This raises questions about the consequences if the military were to confront these citizens. The situation is complex, and emotions are running high as we navigate these challenges.

"National Guard has to come here. And even if it's for a scare attack, they have to come here. There's no control. There's no law and order." "The state of Illinois is ready to stand against this military deployment with every peaceful tool we have. We will see the Trump administration in court. We will use every lever at our disposal to protect the people of Illinois and their rights." "Finally, to the Trump administration officials who are complicit in this scheme, to the public servants who have forsaken their oath to the constitution to serve the petty whims of an arrogant little man." "Twenty twenty four, Chicago experienced 28,443 reported violent crimes. That was a twenty year high, mister Pritzker." "In 2024, there were 800 shootings resulting in death."